[HN Gopher] The UX on This Small Child Is Terrible
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The UX on This Small Child Is Terrible
        
       Author : gumby
       Score  : 228 points
       Date   : 2022-01-04 19:10 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.mcsweeneys.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.mcsweeneys.net)
        
       | blakesterz wrote:
       | McSweeney's is one of those rare gems that's been going forever
       | and is still great. I started my first site in 99 and still
       | remember taking some inspiration from McSweeney's. Though I
       | wanted to be Slashdot mostly.
        
       | awb wrote:
       | Just wait until the automatic over-the-air updates kick in and
       | the Small Child becomes Teenage Child without your consent.
       | 
       | All your favorite Small Child features are now buried 5-layers
       | deep under confusing menus that are apparently different on each
       | version.
       | 
       | I found it under:
       | 
       | Late Night -> Food -> Sugary Foods -> Milkshakes -> Make Your Own
       | -> Enable Small Child Fun Mode
        
         | selimthegrim wrote:
         | It is the hamburger menu still I take it.
        
       | theunraveler wrote:
       | Another case of technical debt resulting in therapy?
        
       | rprenger wrote:
       | Has anyone figured out how to enable "stay sitting on chair
       | during meal"? StackOverflow has totally failed me here.
        
       | encoderer wrote:
       | As a parent, you're not the user, you're the developer.
        
       | akeck wrote:
       | Another McSweeney's article I love:
       | 
       | "MEET OLIVIA! THE COVID-19-ERA AMERICAN GIRL DOLL"
       | 
       | https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/meet-olivia-the-covid-19...
       | 
       | Almost too close to the eventual truth.
        
         | civilized wrote:
         | Is this... humor...?
         | 
         | Apropos that this has just grabbed HN's top spot
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-childre...
        
       | cookie_monsta wrote:
       | I have a slightly ageing model (my co-developer is adamant there
       | will be no upgrades, please do not suggest) and my problem is
       | that it appears to have defaulted to ICT time (we are at GMT
       | +11). I hear it performing operations well into the early
       | morning, but booting from a cold start any earlier than 9am leads
       | to all sorts of unexpected behaviour and system errors.
        
       | prosody wrote:
       | This makes me wonder about the opposite--taking cues from humans'
       | instinctual child-rearing behavior in product design. Not being a
       | parent though that thought started and ended with using infant
       | crying sounds for emergency notifications, which would probably
       | just disturb most people. Does anyone with experience have ideas?
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | Sending the product manager out for a timeout is unlikely to
         | produce a positive change in behavior.
        
       | coldcode wrote:
       | This small child has a better UX than many things I have been
       | forced to implement. At least as it iterates, improvements occur
       | that make the UX better and provide a more pleasant experience.
        
         | technothrasher wrote:
         | "At least as it iterates, improvements occur that make the UX
         | better and provide a more pleasant experience."
         | 
         | Certainly more interesting features get activated. But at least
         | with my model, the error reporting got a lot more complicated
         | and the input acceptance rate dropped considerably around the
         | time the product turned 15 years old.
        
         | chrisfinazzo wrote:
         | Humans get upgrades for free. With Dogs, you apply the patches
         | yourself.*
         | 
         | Cats? Fuck that, those assholes don't need you.
         | 
         | * Results not guaranteed, past performance is no indication of
         | future results. Please read the instruction manual for all
         | possible upgrade scenarios.**
         | 
         | ** You believed that shit? Actually, we lied, there are no
         | instructions and everyone is just improvising all the time!
         | 
         | (Evil laughter)
         | 
         | I'll just be over here in a corner trying not to cry...
        
         | classified wrote:
         | Maybe due to Agile management?
        
       | testplzignore wrote:
       | You told the developers they had to deliver on time and they did
       | - maybe even earlier than the original estimate. This is what you
       | get with death march product development.
       | 
       | And then you have the nerve to complain when the developers try
       | to unionize? You should be lucky that they tolerate your crap -
       | you need them more than they need you.
        
       | mwattsun wrote:
       | Someday my software might love me the way my children did when
       | they were small
        
       | quickthrower2 wrote:
       | Think that's bad. Try UX of adults.
        
       | annoyingnoob wrote:
       | I do not recommend VMs or Containers, Small Child requires direct
       | hardware access.
        
         | rektide wrote:
         | BF Skinner's Air Crib might qualify as a containerizing
         | solution.
         | https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/skinner-air-cr...
        
         | themadturk wrote:
         | Containerization is actually a valid strategy to help induce
         | the sleep states necessary for both parent and child process
         | functionality, especially since prolonged operations outside
         | the containerized environment may result in the parent
         | process(es) not passing even the simplest sanity testing.
        
           | lowbloodsugar wrote:
           | Also remote monitoring as available.
        
       | LeifCarrotson wrote:
       | The antivirus isn't great, either. This is a critical issue,
       | because the networking process inevitably results in numerous
       | breaches which frequently affect other stakeholder systems. Those
       | networking operations critical to a successful eventual
       | deployment of the small child, but the number of bugs experienced
       | is simply inconceivable to users accustomed to good security
       | hygiene.
        
         | samwillis wrote:
         | The trouble we find is our v2 model, which we had hoped could
         | have made improvements over v1, frequents the same unsavoury
         | places that v1 did initially and continues to be compromised by
         | the same vulnerabilities. It seems later versions are destined
         | to make the same mistakes again. The only comfort though is
         | that you have become accustomed to how to address the bug
         | reports when they are filed.
         | 
         | Fortunately our V2 has also reached the point where we have
         | been able to retire our bug reporting and pager setup as it now
         | has its own implementation of this functionality. Although
         | sometimes the reports are less than ideal, such as this evening
         | what it filed a bug report, very loudly, 30 Min after going to
         | bed that it was wearing the wrong pyjamas and the correct ones
         | being it's Toy Story pyjamas, which were in the wash...
        
           | icambron wrote:
           | The maintenance of several products in different lifecycle
           | phases is a huge issue for us. Different failure modes,
           | different protocols for providing feedback, and different
           | basic maintenance needs. For example, v1 requires the users
           | to manage reading homework, the v2 requires bedtime stories,
           | v3 requires diaper changes and milk, all simultaneously. This
           | adds a lot of operational complexity for our already
           | overwhelmed team, since they have to triage several different
           | issue streams and context switch between them.
        
             | kimburgess wrote:
             | At least you're working with versioned releases. I've
             | recently acquired a new model and it's definitely still in
             | beta. There's no documentation, conflicting user training
             | and undefined behaviours everywhere. As soon as you
             | discover workflows that meet your needs there appears to be
             | a background update that while introducing new features,
             | completely changes the behaviour of previous ones.
             | 
             | Oh and don't get me started on the sleep mode, it's more
             | unreliable that a Linux laptop and plays this horrible wake
             | sound with no clear way to disable it. From what I've read
             | on support forums this is happening to other users too.
        
             | samwillis wrote:
             | We were concerned about trying to manage more than two of
             | these products at once and so, as the Assistant to the VP
             | of Reproduction, have made certain permanent operational
             | changes the the equipment to ensure no further acquisitions
             | are possible.
        
       | CapitalistCartr wrote:
       | The things children are born not knowing is crazy. The pre-
       | programming is _limited_! You have to teach them how to blow
       | their nose.
       | 
       | "Don't eat your boogers."
       | 
       | Holds finger out to me. I wipe it off.
       | 
       | "Don't pick your nose, blow it instead. No, don't pick my nose
       | either."
        
         | igetspam wrote:
         | I've been working on the inputs to mine for over four years now
         | and it still hasn't picked up "blow nose!"
        
           | colmvp wrote:
           | Strange, I would've expected blowNose() would be inherited
           | from the parent.
        
         | oh_sigh wrote:
         | Is there any reason beyond social standards that you shouldn't
         | you eat your boogers, or pick your nose? And of course children
         | wouldn't be pre-programmed for social standards, because you
         | don't know what region they are going to be provisioned in.
        
           | bell-cot wrote:
           | If (say) you're starving to death in Donner Pass, then go
           | ahead. Similar for drinking your urine - _if_ at sea in
           | lifeboat and dying for lack of non-salty water. Otherwise,
           | violations of  "eww, ick" social standards tend to be
           | punished harshly.
           | 
           | It seemed _really_ weird for a few years, when conspicuously
           | talking to yourself went from being a  "this person has a
           | serious mental illness" indicator, to being a "this person
           | has a cell phone" indicator.
        
           | CapitalistCartr wrote:
           | I'd estimate the majority of what I teach my son is cultural
           | norms.
           | 
           | "No, there's no good reason you have to do it this way, but
           | you do."
           | 
           | I don't actually say that to him (he's 3), but I say it to
           | myself a lot. And the "Don't pick my nose, either" isn't a
           | joke, that's verbatim.
        
             | sanderjd wrote:
             | I think it is accurate to say things that boil down to
             | "other people will expect you to {xyz thing}", which is not
             | "no good reason".
        
           | fouc wrote:
           | I guess the main reason is that picking nose leaves the
           | finger covered with mucus, and the risk is that the mucus
           | could be spread around - potentially passing on germs.
           | 
           | I suppose if people used hand sanitizer after every nose
           | picking, then maybe it be less of a problem?
        
           | fennecfoxen wrote:
           | Rhinotillexis and mucophagy may help expose the immune system
           | to weakened versions of pathogens. Depending on how well you
           | clean your hands before and after, however, it may introduce
           | new things into the nose, or introduce things in your nose to
           | the people you shake hands with. There is also a minor risk
           | of injury, mostly nosebleed.
        
             | netizen-936824 wrote:
             | Just wanted to say that this sort of interaction is
             | important. I'm glad people question what they're taught and
             | I'm glad that you have responded with a reasonable answer
             | that explains the why behind this social norm. I think the
             | reasoning behind social norms are really important to
             | understand. Not only because they might help reinforce a
             | positive behavior, but we might also come up with a better
             | solution when we discuss it.
             | 
             | Its possible that nose picking and similar behaviors by
             | kids are important for helping build the immune system.
        
             | sanderjd wrote:
             | Yes, I think if you washed your hands immediately afterward
             | every single time, that it would be totally fine (from a
             | first principles standpoint).
        
         | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
         | Reminds me of this old Onion story:
         | http://vaviper.blogspot.com/2019/06/from-onion-study-reveals...
         | 
         | Sorry about the copy link, but it seems that The Onion has
         | removed the original story.
        
           | reaperducer wrote:
           | Mousing over that link shows the URL is "Study reveals babies
           | are HTML."
           | 
           | I guess that explains a lot.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | >The things children are born not knowing is crazy. The pre-
         | programming is limited!
         | 
         | You purchased the DIY version. With this version, you are
         | expected to continuously update the programming. Most people
         | seem to focus on higher level programming using a language of
         | "ivy league".
        
           | selfhoster11 wrote:
           | I'm led to understand that the "Ivy League" tier is in fact
           | not that popular due to the exorbitant subscription fees.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | Right, people may focus on "ivy league" as it is the "it"
             | option, but most people have to settle for "state college"
             | which is much more widely available. however, subscription
             | fees for this option have steadily been increasing as well.
             | 
             | Either way, you are expected to keep the programming
             | updated at your expense. Without it, your Small Child unit
             | might fall behind other versions and become a negative
             | influence on other Small Child units.
        
         | jannyfer wrote:
         | Hang on, genuine question - do some people consider blowing
         | their nose vs. picking their nose to be an all-or-nothing
         | choice?
         | 
         | If it's dry, I can't blow my nose... Unless there is some
         | method I am not aware of.
        
           | technothrasher wrote:
           | I think the lesson learned is really, "don't let people _see_
           | you picking your nose because... reasons "
        
             | titanomachy wrote:
             | File this under "things to re-learn as we emerge from covid
             | and start spending more time in public".
        
         | AnimalMuppet wrote:
         | > The things children are born not knowing is crazy. The pre-
         | programming is _limited_!
         | 
         | The one that blew my mind was, when you're out in the yard,
         | playing with the running hose, and you decide to come inside
         | for something, _don 't bring the running hose with you_! Turns
         | out kids don't automatically know that.
        
         | deanCommie wrote:
         | Honestly, I'm loving this process because you discover so many
         | situations where the answer is "Why not? Uhhh shit, I don't
         | know, actually. You're right, this is stupid. Why does everyone
         | do it this way?"
         | 
         | Mine is 2, so most of the situations so far are just about
         | English rules. (Though every language has stupid
         | inconsistencies)
         | 
         | But there are many things like this in the world. I'm looking
         | forward/dreading trying to balance "OK, from first principles,
         | you're right. But in order to exist in society, you need to do
         | something differently. It's important to recognize when you
         | need to try to fit in. And also important to recognize when
         | it's worth breaking those rules. And even if you choose not to
         | break them, you should be aware of the underlying purpose or
         | lack thereof"
         | 
         | I think it's an impossible task. My kid is going to hate it.
         | I'll do my best.
        
           | sanderjd wrote:
           | I really love the experience of trying really hard to answer
           | every question as accurately and honestly as possible.
        
       | DonHopkins wrote:
       | Too bad he didn't have identical twins: then he could perform A/B
       | testing.
        
       | layer8 wrote:
       | At least it doesn't show ads.
        
         | munificent wrote:
         | My two are basically constantly broadcasting detailed audio ads
         | for Minecraft and Roblox.
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | Rule of thumb: when the UX is that horrible, you're wrong in your
       | assumption abut who the user is: that it is _you_.
        
       | mmettler wrote:
       | I would like to submit some feedback on the teething process.
        
       | plaidfuji wrote:
       | How do I get new features added to the roadmap? I've been asking
       | for an "eat vegetables" interface without the "offer dessert in
       | exchange" workaround for over a year, no response, yet in the
       | same time frame I've seen things like "climb top-heavy bookshelf"
       | and "unfurl entire toilet paper roll" deployed... who is asking
       | for these features??
        
         | cpursley wrote:
         | Can somebody explain the "won't eat vegetables" thing? The only
         | place I've heard about this being in issue is in America.
        
           | coldtea wrote:
           | If everything is saturated with salt/sugar/artificial
           | ehnahced flavors/refined everything/fried/etc with "instant
           | hook"-overcranked-at-11 taste, and it's all targeting the
           | lowest common denominator palette, good luck then trying to
           | teach a person to appreciate tomoatoes, brocolli, asparagus,
           | mushrooms, cheeses, and so on...
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | This is a very good summary of my culinary experience
             | visiting the US. This is not to say that good restaurants
             | don't exist, it's just that cheap/everyday restaurants had
             | everything cranked up to 11. The Cheesecake Factory menu
             | was basically butter and sugar in different ratios.
        
           | mensetmanusman wrote:
           | Sugar/bread is easier.
           | 
           | We solve this by having a tiered eating system that starts
           | with some salad or veggies, if they don't eat, they clearly
           | aren't deathly hungry; dessert is available at the end of the
           | meal if they finish.
           | 
           | Note this may require a family eating culture that includes
           | salad et al. With every dinner, which is not the norm in
           | America.
        
             | cpursley wrote:
             | I wonder if it's also the preparation method. Steamed
             | veggies are of course not appealing vs ones flash fried in
             | a little oil/butter plus salt.
        
               | vlunkr wrote:
               | I think preparation is a big part. If you offer a kid
               | pizza and some cold broccoli together then yeah, they'll
               | skip the broccoli.
        
               | mattlondon wrote:
               | Generally speaking, added salt is something you need to
               | avoid with young kids. Likewise for saturated fats.
               | 
               | https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/baby/weaning-and-
               | feeding/foods...
        
               | mdavis6890 wrote:
               | Regarding salt, From the link, "babies" is different than
               | kids. I doubt salt is going to hurt anyone older except
               | in specific cases like heart disease or something.
               | 
               | I don't buy the saturated fats thing either, except to
               | the extent that they are a source of calories. If you
               | have links to some studies that indicate negative
               | outcomes vs the same caloric intake from other sources I
               | am willing to read them.
        
               | mdavis6890 wrote:
               | I figured out the flash fry thing just last year. Game
               | changer, for me as well as the kids. So yummy. Be careful
               | with that hot oil though! The most dangerous thing in the
               | kitchen afaikt.
        
               | gumby wrote:
               | Steamed is how I like them the best, FWIW.
        
               | amock wrote:
               | My experience with little kids is that steamed vegetables
               | are the most appealing, they just need to be offered
               | before sweets. Things fried in grease or with salt added
               | seem to be something that becomes much more appealing
               | later.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | reaperducer wrote:
           | _Can somebody explain the "won't eat vegetables" thing? The
           | only place I've heard about this being a problem is in
           | America._
           | 
           | And yet I've seen it on TV shows in both the U.K., and
           | Australia.
        
           | cameldrv wrote:
           | I've heard some speculation that this can be related to
           | breast vs. formula feeding. If the mom eats a lot of
           | vegetables, some of the tastes will come out in the milk and
           | get the baby accustomed to those tastes.
        
             | mithr wrote:
             | This is highly unlikely, similarly to claims that eating
             | cruciferous vegetables will lead to gassy breast-fed
             | babies. Breast milk isn't the distilled contents of the
             | parent's stomach. In contrast, alcohol (for example) is a
             | problem because it affects the parent's _bloodstream_ , not
             | because it fills their stomach.
        
           | enaaem wrote:
           | I find that many western households don't know how to cook
           | vegetables. Often mushy and overcooked. I as an adult don't
           | enjoy eating that either.
        
           | mattlondon wrote:
           | My kid (~2 years) prefers to eat food they like the taste of
           | most.
           | 
           | Turns out that they prefer the sweet tastes of biscuits and
           | even bananas etc to broccoli and carrots.
           | 
           | They'll whinge and whine about being hungry, so you offer
           | them some peas or avocado or something and they will
           | literally push it out of the way, look you straight in the
           | eye, and tell you about how hungry they are (...but not
           | hungry enough to eat the veggies in front of them!). Offer
           | them crisps or biscuits or even just fruity-yoghurt and
           | they'll scoff it down super-fast because presumably it tastes
           | nicer.
           | 
           | Can't blame them really.
        
             | selimthegrim wrote:
             | So do they not class carrots as sweet at all? Is this
             | related to kids hating olives at all?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | >who is asking for these features??
         | 
         | The project managers have had a look at some of the competing
         | products, and felt that matching features would be more
         | competitive vs fixing existing bugs.
        
           | sophacles wrote:
           | Yeah, but look at puppy for example - it just eats what you
           | give it. (If anything, the makers of that product should
           | introduce a bit of pickiness tbh). The small child makers
           | should really take an example from puppy - AI is a nice way
           | to get some behaviors trained up, but over-doing it (e.g. in
           | the "what to eat" module) can be just as bad as not enough
           | (compare brine shrimp for the problems of a no AI approach).
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | Sorry, you're blaming someone else for the decision on
             | chosing Small Child vs Cute Loveable Puppy? Buyer's remorse
             | is strong. You should have researched the return options
             | before purchase. However, adding Cute Loveable Puppy can
             | sometimes improve Small Child, or just add to headache.
        
             | na85 wrote:
             | Puppy also happily rolls in excrement if you don't run the
             | Leash plugin.
             | 
             | I have the 2017 Small Child Pro and mine tried to eat a
             | cigarette butt that she found in a mid puddle but at least
             | she doesn't roll in goose shit.
        
         | titusblair wrote:
         | LOL!!
        
         | xwdv wrote:
         | Food should never be a reward to a child. Offer something else.
        
         | dvaun wrote:
         | We put everything on a plate and offer it to the child(ren).
         | Then, if they become hungry later on, they can return to said
         | plate and continue eating.
         | 
         | Dessert is considered "equal", so we place it on their plate.
         | However, that also means that they can't raid the pantry for
         | snacks afterward.
         | 
         | It seems to be working. Our oldest ate celery and peanut butter
         | the other day, which is pretty unexpected to us.
        
           | gumby wrote:
           | In the US most peanut butters include added sugar so your kid
           | may have hacked your system.
        
             | munificent wrote:
             | Shout-out to Adams peanut butter which is delicious and has
             | zero sugar.
        
               | hathawsh wrote:
               | Some Adams trivia:
               | 
               | - It's owned by Smucker's. I normally dislike anything
               | from Smucker's, but Adams is a nice exception.
               | 
               | - If you get the giant jar from Costco, the oil
               | separation is a significant issue. There's a simple
               | solution: dump it all into a big mixing bowl (with the
               | help of a silicone spatula), mix it, and pour it back
               | into the jar. I did it last time I bought it and it was
               | worth the 10 minutes I spent.
               | 
               | - Once it's mixed well, if you give it a quick stir every
               | time you use it, the oil doesn't separate again.
        
           | jokethrowaway wrote:
           | Talking by experience, my kids would just eat dessert and cry
           | later that they want more dessert.
           | 
           | I went in the opposite direction. I put a small portion of
           | meat on the dish. When it's over, I put some vegetables;
           | rinse and repeat until the portion of food is assimilated.
           | 
           | It seems like giving small goals is helping with going
           | through the entire dinner and not having a choice minimises
           | building up dislike for a specific food.
           | 
           | I think the reasoning for the second phenomenon is something
           | like:
           | 
           | 1. I can eat potatoes or chicken. 2. I like potatoes. 3. I'll
           | eat potatoes. 4. Remember that dislikeChicken++ 4. Go back to
           | 1 until I'm full
        
         | tonyedgecombe wrote:
         | > unfurl entire toilet paper roll
         | 
         | That reminds me of one ours pulling the film out of three 35mm
         | film canisters.
        
           | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
           | I can't remember the last time I needed a postage stamp, but
           | I have a strong memory of my then 3 year-old proudly showing
           | the book he had decorated with the roll of "stickers" he
           | found!
        
         | account-5 wrote:
         | Someone deployed the "public punch in the balls and run off
         | laughing" feature on mine. I can even get rid of it, I was told
         | I needed to keep it longer than 4 years. The "throw trantum
         | when not allowed to eat broken glass" feature is really
         | annoying.
        
         | coldtea wrote:
         | > _I've been asking for an "eat vegetables" interface without
         | the "offer dessert in exchange" workaround_
         | 
         | Perhaps "not eating vegetables" shouldn't have been presented
         | as an option, but instead "we eat what is on offer today, there
         | is no special menu".
         | 
         | More often than not, it's spoiling the kid with sweets, pizza,
         | or perhaps just cooking their favorite dishes on demand every
         | time (as opposed to as a love gesture once in a while), that
         | prevents them from enjoying and appreciating a wider range of
         | food.
         | 
         | Once somebody has been hooked on the quick-fix of a burger, for
         | example, it's difficult to learn to appreciate the deeper
         | textures, tastes, etc. of vegetables and other more refined
         | recipes.
        
       | titusblair wrote:
       | Hilarious!
        
       | christophilus wrote:
       | The NLP in mine seems to be totally broken. It thinks "Stop
       | throwing your food on the floor!" Means "Please, do that on
       | loop." Also, it supposedly has the advanced AI capabilities, but
       | its driving is way worse than Tesla Autopilot.
        
       | eitland wrote:
       | As someone who's gone through this five times (ok, going through
       | it for the fifth):
       | 
       | My experience has been that once I understood it it became very
       | simple, but learning it was hard since none of the documentation
       | is complete and it often only covers the small child that the
       | author of said document had.
       | 
       | One piece of very practical advice that I picked up from some
       | docs somewhere though:
       | 
       | For some reason adults easily understand that kids needs to learn
       | to eat, learn to walk and learn to speak and later write.
       | 
       | For some reason however many of us think that kids just should
       | know how to sleep.
       | 
       | Most kids however doesn't know how to get a good nights sleep
       | however.
       | 
       | Some general advice in that regard:
       | 
       | - Don't let kids over a year fall asleep with anything they
       | cannot keep during the night (food, parents by their side, music,
       | film etc.) We all wake up about once an hour to see that things
       | are still OK. This is good thing. For small kids this check seems
       | to be mostly that things are exactly as they were when they fell
       | asleep. Not knowing about this mechanism can drive a good hearted
       | parent mad since they'll go to extreme lengths to make sure their
       | kids are happy - including waking up once an hour to help the kid
       | fall asleep again. (Case in point: I did this for months until I
       | realized my kid woke up once an hour because she always fell
       | asleep with a bottle of milk and consequently woke up once an
       | hour the rest of the night to tell us things weren't right until
       | she could have some more milk in her bottle.)
       | 
       | - Some people recommend letting one year olds crying themselves
       | to sleep until they "learn to sleep". I recommend against it.
       | What small kids seems to be afraid of is that parents disappear.
       | Training the kid to realize that parents are there and will check
       | back even if they don't cry seems to help a lot. In other words:
       | if kid cries, pop your head in and say the some very few
       | carefully selected nice words, but more importantly and somewhat
       | counterintuitively if the kid does not cry, have a timer on short
       | intervals and make it boringly predictable to the kid that you
       | will show up even if they don't cry. What I found out was that as
       | soon as my kids realized I would come back with boring precision
       | even if they just played with their toys they stopped shouting or
       | crying: I cannot know what they think but I guess somewhere along
       | the lines of "no need to bother crying if dad shows up in exacly
       | 2 minutes 40 seconds since he was here 20 seconds ago"
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ninkendo wrote:
       | Sounds like somebody hasn't read the documentation:
       | https://www.amazon.com/Baby-Owners-Manual-Instructions-Troub...
        
         | chrisfinazzo wrote:
         | Nobody reads the documentation :)
         | 
         | Although, as I understand it, some of the training materials
         | for new employees has gotten better over the years.
         | 
         | https://www.amazon.com/Welcome-Willems-Guide-New-Arrivals/dp...
        
       | cptnapalm wrote:
       | In the context of the larger game of Real Life, the NPCs get
       | really mad if you lose one of the children. That's not fun at
       | all.
        
         | lifeisstillgood wrote:
         | I remember being a parent helper at a school trip. Now at my
         | paid employment, 99% successful completion rate would be bonus
         | time, but coming back with only 99% of the children who started
         | the trip was considered a failure - clearly the education
         | system has something to learn from modern management practise !
        
           | spzb wrote:
           | It's even worse if you come back with 99% having set off with
           | fewer than 100 individual units in the first place.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-04 23:00 UTC)