[HN Gopher] Young people from Brazil's favelas set out to conque... ___________________________________________________________________ Young people from Brazil's favelas set out to conquer digital world Author : zwieback Score : 90 points Date : 2022-01-12 17:10 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.spiegel.de) (TXT) w3m dump (www.spiegel.de) | lbrito wrote: | Such a waste on a great subject. | | There's this huge social and economic change in Brazil over the | last 10 or so years where dozens of millions of people are | acceding to the digital world; broadband (usually 4G) access to | the internet is becoming part of their daily lives. This has huge | consequences and tons of opportunity. Nubank is a quick example I | can think of that knew how to take advantage of this movement and | is now a billion-dollar company expanding through all Latam. | | But no, instead they decide to spotlight game streamers. | vmception wrote: | but just because you don't respect game streamers doesn't mean | that it doesn't have huge consequences and opportunities too. | | the people doing that have income and access to capital now | whether a bank showed up or not, which is way better than any | neobank fintech company can achieve. | | in the past, access to capital or electronic payments meant | "bank the unbanked", now it doesn't mean that so there's no | reason to cling to that goal. | lbrito wrote: | Sorry, but this has nothing to do with whether I respect | streamers or not. | | Streamers produce entertainment. That's fine, I'm all for | entertainment -- I pay for Netflix, for instance. But it is | just entertainment. You can't have a strong economy based on | producing entertainment alone. We need jobs that produce | real-life value at some point. | | In other words, kudos to the dude in the favela making money | out of streaming, good for him. It's just _not_ something | that can be scaled and applied to the millions of people | living in favelas that need a good job (or any job really). | frozenlettuce wrote: | as someone who had a previous carreer in journalism (and also | happen to be a Brazilian as well), the media will always | portrait the country in a way to make it seem "exotic" in order | to gain more attention. that's why you will _never_ see news | articles about boring countryside towns | paperwasp42 wrote: | Wow, this is fascinating. Does anyone know of any mentorship | programs that help youth in under-developed countries who are | working to get into tech? I would love to participate in that | kind of program, but the only ones I've seen are company based | (ie: internal internship programs.) | nopenopenopeno wrote: | This article is propaganda ahead of the upcoming election. The | working people of Brazil have suffered tremendously under | Bolsanaro's neoliberal government and the Worker's Party is | leading in the polls. After the recent socialist victories in | Chile and Bolivia (following the U.S.-assisted coup), western | states will do everything they can to prevent the Worker's | Party from retaking power in Brazil. Expect more of this as the | Fall election nears. | bserge wrote: | When you're at zero, anything happening is a "boom". | | I should know, I'm from a country where IT is "booming"... Most | of it is tedious boring work that was outsourced by western | companies because no one there wants to do it, plus it's cheaper | than even creating some automated processes. | | Still, that's a pessimistic way to look at it. It's a good thing, | and it can grow into something better. | 627467 wrote: | Another perspective is that there are people who prefer to do | those jobs (instead of say, working in Amazon warehouse) but | can't because it's cheaper (and logistically possible) to | outsource to another country. | space_fountain wrote: | But also on some level why in the world are they more | deserving of the job then the potentially better qualified | foreigner just because where they happened to be born. | ipaddr wrote: | The question is why is it better for the country not who is | more deserving. This is an export of US dollars. Is it | better to keep the position local so member of society can | be taxed/buy from other local businesses or export so | foreign worker can buy tools from US firms or US business | can get job done for cheaper. | pm90 wrote: | They are not. At some level, we accept that there are a lot | of inequities in our current sociopolitical systems. | | What China (and the Asian Tigers) have shown us is that it | _is_ a feasible path to industrialize though. But its | possible there are better ways to get to higher standards | of living, we just haven 't tried them yet. | bserge wrote: | If these people don't apply for these jobs, they might as | well not exist. | | Amazon warehouses are staffed with immigrants in Europe. And | they would simply not be able to do anything IT related. | | It might seem easy for us, but it's not. We're talking about | people who can't reinstall Windows. They won't be doing | manual unit testing anytime soon, or ever, nevermind anything | more complicated. | | German companies love keeping it local. Things like manual | app testing are advertised as Minijobs, but very few are | applying. And of course, they complain about a lack of | workers. So outsourcing can make sense beyond saving every | penny. | Toine wrote: | I cannot take someone who calls himself a "crypto artist" | seriously. | chucksmash wrote: | Commenting on crypto in bio is 2022 HN's version of 2014 HN's | commenting on site's CSS: "Good article, but black font on | white bg makes this literally unreadable for me." | neonate wrote: | https://archive.is/Omfjf | TameAntelope wrote: | How the hell do they run these operations or have this amount of | gear safely in a favela? | | When I did a full-on tourist experience of Rio, the guides were | adamant that we not even go near any favela, as we'd immediately | be robbed or worse. My understanding was that the crime in those | areas was so astronomically high that nothing even resembling IT | infrastructure could exist, as it would immediately be | confiscated by the cartels operating there. | | I'm glad that's not the case, but I wish the article had more | information about how these people were able to operate safely. | iqanq wrote: | gdcbe wrote: | I lived at the edge of 2 favellas for a couple of months as | part of my short life in Brazil. I can tell you, while their | houses are small and simple made they often have high tech in | their houses. Partly due to the fact that their government had | programs allowing them to buy it cheaply. | | From my limited experience the problem wasn't so much that tech | wasn't or couldn't be available but that a lot of them couldn't | even read. | | They provide electricity tapped from the net and everything. | | Also remember that for these gangs peace is more interesting | and profitable than a lot of crime and chaos. Especially over | the long run. | thescriptkiddie wrote: | > these gangs peace is more interesting and profitable than a | lot of crime and chaos | | I think it is enlightening to look at these sort of | situations through the lens of feudalism. Criminal gangs are | not sociopathic comic book villains interested in violence | for the fun of it, they are more like landlords, and are in | it for money, security, and a sense of community. Medieval | kings, the Italian/American/Japanese mafias, South/Central | American drug cartels, and Middle Eastern/African "warlords" | are all cut from the same cloth. | arcticfox wrote: | > Also remember that for these gangs peace is more | interesting and profitable than a lot of crime and chaos. | Especially over the long run. | | Right - a lot of these places are essentially very poor | neighborhoods under separate governance. For better | (sometimes) or (often) for worse. | pelasaco wrote: | What would be impossible for most of us, but some born and | raised there, have no problem to spend their live living | there, in their community. Another reason: The rent is cheap, | energy and internet is "for free". | vm wrote: | 12M+ people live in favelas. Many parts are safe. | pelasaco wrote: | if you live there and you earn your respect from the community, | you are safe. In most favelas, criminals are not allowed to | steal from other residents. They have their own rules. The real | metaverse. | goldenchrome wrote: | The real metaverse? You mean... a community? | pelasaco wrote: | no, more like a meta universe. Running inside Brazil, but | with their own set of rules and tradition. For some it is a | Dystopian reality. For others, just another day in the | office. | goldenchrome wrote: | You've got to be joking. Now you're describing a country. | dudus wrote: | The drug dealers for all the bad they do they also support | and help the community a lot. This is part of their strategy, | the community in turn protect them, hide them. In many | favelas the drug lord is the law, and the law is don't poop | where you eat. You may be able to steal from people outside | the favela but not inside the favela, if you do the | punishment can be medieval, like cut hands or even death. | It's not only for residents though. Even as a tourist you are | probably safe in a favela, it's their interest you feel safe | so you don't feel intimidated to go buy drugs. But again | after living in Rio and Sao Paulo for many years I wouldn't | recommend anyone to do that. | pelasaco wrote: | I spent some years in Sao Paulo and in Rio too. I had many | friends and visited almost daily the Morro do Cantagalo, a | huge favela there. You can live pretty well there, but they | make sure that you know who is the boss there. | xwdv wrote: | Killing is legal in the favelas? | SwiftyBug wrote: | Nope. | xwdv wrote: | Might not be legal but also not enforced. | pelasaco wrote: | What means legal? It is part of Brazil, and therefore the | same rules applies there, so its not legal. If there is | murder in Favela that the Police cannot investigate and | punish the responsible for that? For sure. Specially if | who died was criminal. | cassianoleal wrote: | > When I did a full-on tourist experience of Rio, the guides | were adamant that we not even go near any favela, as we'd | immediately be robbed or worse. | | Tourists stand out like a sore thumb as a target. Your guide | was probably right. | cpach wrote: | I don't have first-hand knowledge of this but according to what | I have read about the favelas it's like a shadow society | basically. I.e. they have their own rules, companies, | infrastructure. IIRC the book I read it in was probably Stewart | Brand's "Whole Earth Discipline". | Carioca wrote: | Crime syndicates keep the peace in these communities, and they | can be negotiated with. | speeder wrote: | I am from Brazil and to be honest the government push for this | is kinda silly. There are other problems to solve first. | | There was an event I participated about this, I was teaching | about gamedev using opensource tools, a lot of people paid to | go, the government then brought in a ton of people from the | favelas as part of their "digital inclusion" program, although | I was happy to teach them, later I heard many of them just | stole people's computers, mouses, keyboards, etc... and bolted, | a good chunk of the "digital inclusion" people that went for | free, didn't sit in a single workshop, instead they just | disappeared, and a ton of equipment with them. | | Even outside favelas, our infrastructure is just shit too, I | work from home and losing power and internet is a constant | threat, sometimes water goes out too. | | And corruption in general just runs deep, I know a TV producer | that was hired to make an Ad for the government, he had to | record a government building inside a favela, to make the ad | for the government, yet the local government guy wouldn't let | him inside to make the recording the government was demanding, | he had to approach a congressman about it, and the guy just | flat demanded 10k to "do his thing" and make it work. | | He did paid the guy, then after that the drug lord demanded | another 10k to allow the TV crew inside the favela without | being shot. | | After he recorded it, the congressman was seen with a new | car... meanwhile the drug lord seemly dunked the entire 10k | into meat, charcoal and booze and threw a huge barbecue party | to the locals. | csdvrx wrote: | > After he recorded it, the congressman was seen with a new | car... meanwhile the drug lord seemly dunked the entire 10k | into meat, charcoal and booze and threw a huge barbecue party | to the locals. | | It seems to me that one care more about his constituents that | the other! | whatshisface wrote: | Something interesting in American history circa a century | ago was the party machine, which combined both roles into | one. The fact that it's not around today could be a sign of | either a decline in corruption, or a decline in the | importance of getting voters to be really strongly on your | side (as opposed to being 1% less bad than the other | candidate). | pc86 wrote: | This might sound out of left field but (hear me out) I | think the decline is due in large part to gerrymandering. | 100 years ago you had a lot of pretty competitive races | where party control might switch often. It was incumbent | on the party machine you mention to make sure all its | supporters got out. You'd _usually_ see the party rally | around whoever won the primary, because there was still | another election to win. | | Fast forward through some pretty aggressive and | technologically advanced gerrymandering, and something | like 90% of congressional seats are pretty well insulated | from drastic party changes election over election. The | primary becomes the only election that matters for most | districts, which pushes both parties to the extremes. | Because the primary is the only one that matters, there | is little to no incentive to rally around your chosen | candidate - you just fight that much harder for your | favorite one next time. | | Solidifying party control in most districts has somewhat | paradoxically weakened party control over the process | while simultaneously pushing elected candidates to the | extremes. | rbanffy wrote: | You make a very good point about the nascent extremism - | as primaries become the only elections that matter, and | because you need extreme candidates to flip those locked | districts, there is little reward in moderation. I find | it funny how Republicans embraced extremism while | Democrats seem to be more averse to it, even though | they'd have much to gain in this scenario. | | This is what I really like about Ireland's elections - | they are so effective in weeding out extremists that the | two dominant political forces are almost | indistinguishable. It's, perhaps, too efficient in that, | but it also seems to be extremely safe and long-term | stable. | selimthegrim wrote: | You are saying this as SF is in pole position to form a | government (not calling them extremists but comparing | them to the main two) | rackjack wrote: | I think it's both, due to secret ballots and first past | the post voting, for example. | rightbyte wrote: | How could the congressman influence the recording permit | process? What new car goes for 10k? | | I believe you it is bad but that sounds like your friend is | spreading a tall tale. | nopenopenopeno wrote: | It sounds like Lula is leading in the polls, and it sounds | like the best thing for the working people of Brazil is to | elect him. | vmception wrote: | Its exaggerated, there would probably be no remedy for you if | it occurred but that doesn't mean people don't have other shit | going on. | | Most "dangerous ghettos" are the same way. If people dont have | beef with you they arent just looking to take advantage. A | sociopathic person with a badge is much more dangerous because | they dont have to collaborate at all, unlike civilians. | wolverine876 wrote: | Any time you hear those extremes about any place - e.g., lots | of people say it about parts of American cities - it's | nonsense. People live there; they are biologically the same as | you; they live, breathe and think, they not complete idiots. | They aren't organizing, tolerating or sticking around a | situation like that. | | (That said, I know nothing about favelas or what is wise or | unwise to do in them.) | ghaff wrote: | >lots of people say it about parts of American cities - it's | nonsense | | In general (although it used to be truer). | | That said, there are many places in US cities where I'd | pretty strongly recommend against looking out of place, | wandering around like a clueless tourist, late at night. | | No, you probably won't be shot. But being robbed isn't out of | the question. | | What is almost certainly true is you're pretty safe most | places if you blend in reasonably, keep valuables hidden, and | look like you know what you're doing. | wolverine876 wrote: | > there are many places in US cities where I'd pretty | strongly recommend against looking out of place, wandering | around like a clueless tourist, late at night. | | We can always construct hypothetical situations that meet | some criteria. I wouldn't recommend that in any part of any | city. | marcan_42 wrote: | > I wouldn't recommend that in any part of any city. | | It's pretty safe in Tokyo. Not every city requires you to | be on the constant lookout for your own safety. | | Perhaps you're used to cities with higher crime rates, | and are projecting that onto every city. | simplestats wrote: | Where I live now, you can wander around at night no | problem. A cop might get suspicious and hassle you is | about the worst. | | I have also lived in places where not only would I advise | more-vulnerable people against going out at night, I | wouldn't go wander around myself either. | | But yes the odds of being a victim aren't leaping from | zero to 100 percent between these nighborhoods. More like | aceptably low to unacceptably high. | mixmastamyk wrote: | A friend of mine's company does the favela tour with | cooperation from the community and has been doing it safely for | almost twenty years now: | | https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g303506-d24775... | | https://www.instagram.com/bealocaltours/ | smoe wrote: | Don't know much about Rio, but what I have seen and heard | elsewhere in Latin America over the years. | | Often times organized crimes substitutes an absent government | and enforce their own set of law and order in the community. | They can't afford to just rob the people blind as sometimes | portrayed in media. They rely on a somewhat sybmiotic | relationship with the "citizens" to act as messengers, human | surveillance cameras, warning them from unknown people | entering, making false statements to the police etc. The gangs | are often much more effective at crime prevention than the | government, they often invest more locally than the government. | | A big chunk of the violet crimes comes from conflicts between | gangs. If you are part of the community and stay in line you | can actually be pretty safe. As a tourist on the other hand, | you are fair game. | | Obviously, it is not everything is rosy and nice, but in my | opinion one of the big challenges in facing organized crime, is | that the governments don't actually have a believable | improvement to offer to the people, so the locals will often | defend the current situation. | cpach wrote: | I guess that's how it has also been in parts of Italy (and | maybe still is, to some extent...?) | anonporridge wrote: | The interesting thing is that this is literally how all | governments originally emerged. | | The strongest local gang establishes a monopoly on violence | in their territory. They then extract tribute (taxes) from | the local population in various ways. If they get too greedy | and extract too much, then eventually the plebs have little | enough to lose to break their established order and fight the | establishment gang. The most competent gangs find the | equilibrium of taxation that is the maximum they can extract | without suffocating production and innovation or creating an | opposing revolution. | | So, in locations where this has happened in modern states, it | simply demonstrates that the "official" police and state have | failed to manage their monopoly on violence properly, and are | being actively out competed by a more effective organization | that, if it continues to sustainably control its territory, | will eventually become recognized as the new legitimate | state. | vanusa wrote: | _The interesting thing is that this is literally how all | governments originally emerged._ | | No - there are also revolutions and secessionist movements. | Which already in their formation can be better thought of | as mini-governments than "gangs" per se. | | The basic problem with the idea of saying "it all started | from gang rule" is that it brings to mind an image of | criminal networks that just happened to fall into | government-like activities (e.g. muscling out other gangs, | running basic services) as a way of staying in business. | Certainly true in some cases, but in most cases ... not a | particularly meaningful description. | xchaotic wrote: | This is very true and it paints a dim view on the XXI | century- we are going to be ruled by thugs and gangsters | because we "vote" them in, until it's too late. | anonporridge wrote: | Democracy only works well if serving the people and | giving them a strong voice and control accrues more power | to the state than alternative forms of governance. | | If the people, or more specifically the democratic | majority, end up becoming more extractive than they are | productive towards enhancing their state's power, then | eventually some alternative organizing governance | structure will emerge that accumulates power more | effectively. | | This isn't making an ethical judgement about one system | or another, just an observation on what appears to be | base level reality. | dasil003 wrote: | Because they live there and have relationships, it's very | different from a tourist who just looks like a cash machine. | aylmao wrote: | Depends on the city/country, but there's also an argument | affecting tourists is just not worth it. | | Money isn't the goal, money + little trouble is the goal. If | a city is a big tourist destination, the bad press, the | potential involvement of foreign nations, the outcry from the | tourism industry, etc are all good reasons for local law | enforcement to strike back hard. | | Especially if overwhelmed, it's very possible local law | enforcement wont give the same weight to an investigation | involving only locals and one involving a foreigner, | especially if the eyes of, say, Germany are staring at you. | lostlogin wrote: | They may be a degree of liability involved too - | take/encourage/let tourists go there and it could have | consequences for the tour operator? | | I am very much not a lawyer. | kilroy123 wrote: | My ex girlfriend lived in Brazil for ~10 years and her job was | running tours to the favelas. She told me there were fairly | strict rules about this sort of thing. | | The gangs there cared about drugs and making money. As long as | you weren't there interfering with them making money, they | didn't really care about you as a tourist. They might get a | phone or pocket change from you but why waste time and money on | just that? Bigger fish to fry. | | In all the years my ex hungout and worked in the favela, not | one bad thing happened to her. Which surprised the hell out of | me. (She was a foreigner but spoke the language) | aylmao wrote: | I'm from Mexico-- there's plenty of "bad places" there too. | | You really don't want something bad to happen to a tourist, | so you focus on the worst-case scenario. It akin to a | children and streets; it's easier to tell children to avoid | crossing a street and not have to worry, even if | statistically it's pretty unlikely an accident would happen. | | Moreover, since the news largely focuses on the tragedies, | it's easy to get an inflated sense of danger. I know people | who live in Culiacan, right in the center of the Sinaloa | Cartel. They'll tell me every day in the news someone is | dead. | | Nonetheless, they live worry-free, peaceful lives. In a city | of 1 million, and especially if you're not involved with | cartels, even considering the homicide rates are much higher | than they should, it's very unlikely something bad will | happen to you. | selimthegrim wrote: | Is Mazatlan considered a "bad" place? | newaccount2021 wrote: | people from around the world hungry to pull themselves up from | the bottom... | | meanwhile in NYC and Oakland, high school students are on | "strike" and walking out of class over bogus covid hysteria (aka | a legit excuse to combine virtue signalling and goofing | off)...apparently we must grovel to their demands as the world | owes so much to, and depends so much on, the American teen | | fast forward twenty years, who will have risen, who will have | fallen | csdvrx wrote: | I vouched for your comment, since it talks about a very | possible risk: replacement at the low end (and little by little | towards the upper end) of WFH techies by other WFH techies from | lower cost countries that won't ever think about this union | stuff. | | China has proved outsourcing is a valid path for growth as | people learn the technology little-by-little to do what they | need: these game streamers derided by other HN comments will | certainly learn how to reinstall Windows and drivers, then how | to deal with their fans, then how to make their website (if | only to reduce costs/keep more profits) etc | | And even if they only learn one of these (say, dealing with | fans), personally I'd be happy more than happy to hire them as | a community manager if the price is fair. | steve76 wrote: | > people from around the world hungry to pull themselves up | from the bottom... | | Foreign countries are poor like the Rolling Stones or Motley | Crew are poor. They are actually very wealthy. They see nice | peaceful lives as something for fools and cowards. | | > meanwhile in NYC and Oakland, high school students are on | "strike" and walking out of class over bogus covid hysteria | (aka a legit excuse to combine virtue signalling and goofing | off)...apparently we must grovel to their demands as the world | owes so much to, and depends so much on, the American teen | | Awful to see people turn their backs on their own. Big tech | would be gone without bailouts and cheap consumer credit to buy | their junk. Despite all their prestige, they don't do anything. | People still die horribly. Their charity is not enough. The | problems, such as neurological disease, are much more difficult | than they thought. "Disruption" or "don't be evil" didn't work. | | We gave them the luxury of a lot of resources while we fought | some very bad people and took care of the sick. First chance | they get they leave for Cypress and Brazil for people who | really do hate them. | | >fast forward twenty years, who will have risen, who will have | fallen | | I work from home and am only in tech because of family care- | taking. Twenty years will be a sad time for me. Everyone will | be gone. I'll be all alone. | | Despite that, I kept up on my skills. I managed to have at | least some real workplace experience. I have nothing but free | time, and I am going to be incredibly angry at and have very | little remorse towards the people we trusted with all our | wealth and who chose marxists and drug gangs and terrorists | over their own and burnt and looted my home. | tdrgabi wrote: | I have mixed feelings about the article. I was curious to read | about a tech boom. | | They described a twitch player which earns enough to be afloat. A | gaming pro team and an artist selling nft's. | | Is it just an add for nft's or a submarine piece for afro games. | dang wrote: | OK, we've taken 'tech boom' out of the title since that seems | to be distracting from what the article is actually about. | [deleted] | mensetmanusman wrote: | The image of someone sitting in a shack with VR gear on was | thought provoking. | | Will the adaptation of this technology accelerate quality of life | improvements, or will it be an opiate of the masses who would | rather exist virtually than in the real world? | | Could this remove political desire for rapid change? | pm90 wrote: | > Could this remove political desire for rapid change? | | No, since in the end you do have to return to the "real" world. | Unless we can upload ourselves to the metaverse, a majority of | humans will continue to want change in meatspace. | aylmao wrote: | There is the argument though that you could "entertain" | people away supporting a fair cause. | | This both by means of propaganda through the content they | consume, and by simply giving people something they can | consider "good enough". Would people in micro-apartments be | happy living in 32m^2 if they didn't have computers / TVs? | apsurd wrote: | sorry, i can't help but read this as rather tone deaf. People | are very complex. | lbrito wrote: | >Will the adaptation of this technology accelerate quality of | life improvements? | | No. | | Things favelas need, in order of importance: | | 1. Jobs | | 2. Jobs | | 3. Jobs | | 4. Decent waste disposal | | 5. Decent public infrastructure - mass transit, daycare, health | clinics, schools, etc. | | 6. Decent public services - police, postal office, social | service workers, etc. | | 7. Etc | | 8. ... | | ... | | Infinite - VR gear with SV technobabble, MMORPG, play-to-earn | BS. | | Source: I am Brazilian. | f00zz wrote: | This country should have never normalized favelas. Just 50 | years ago, places like Singapore and Seoul used to have slums | that looked a lot like Brazilian favelas. But they invested | in public housing and now look like sci-fi cities from the | 25th century, while we were singing "quem mora no morro vive | pertinho do ceu". | lbrito wrote: | I understand your point and I see comparisons with South | Korea a lot. Sibling commenter makes a good remark about | education. | | Another huge difference which can't be underestimated is | the geopolitical importance of South Korea and the ensuing | economic aid from the US. | | Singapore also has uniquenesses (its location) that | wouldn't translate well into other countries. | | In no way does this diminish the merits of both those | countries -- its great that they managed to develop so | well, and they deserve applause for doing so. But I don't | think we can easily compare either to Brazil. | bloodyplonker22 wrote: | It's not as simple as the government fixing the problem by | simply "investing in public housing". If it were that easy, | Brazil would have already done it. Singapore and Seoul | created educated populations and skilled jobs that were | able to fit into growing industries like tech. The | government can almost never just fix a problem by pouring | money into it. | [deleted] | ugh123 wrote: | If you haven't already, check out Ready Player One. The book, | not the movie. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-12 23:01 UTC)