[HN Gopher] Great AA Alkaline Battery Test (2016) ___________________________________________________________________ Great AA Alkaline Battery Test (2016) Author : ValentineC Score : 137 points Date : 2022-01-12 18:15 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (goughlui.com) (TXT) w3m dump (goughlui.com) | bentcorner wrote: | > _This can be implemented basically with a fixed value of | resistance, but because of the way resistance interacts with | voltage, it's actually very gentle on the battery. As the battery | voltage falls, the current falls accordingly, so the delivered | power falls even further. For modern appliances, this type of | loading is not common._ | | Dumb question - is it at all possible to design a modern device | which operates this way? (As battery voltage falls, device | performance also falls? It's been a really really long time since | my EE classes - are transistors just unable to operate this way?) | gruez wrote: | > It's been a really really long time since my EE classes - are | transistors just unable to operate this way?) | | Yeah, most CPUs nowadays have dynamic frequency adjustment to | maximize battery life. Lower frequencies also mean transistors | can operate at lower voltages, so by reducing the operating | frequency, you can reduce the voltage and therefore power draw | on your battery. | sbierwagen wrote: | Some LED flashlights with multiple brightness modes will drop | to low brightness mode when cell voltage falls below a certain | point. | orev wrote: | Apple did this with iPhones, where the CPU throttles itself | when the battery can't keep up with the peak demand anymore. | They got sued for it (mostly because they didn't tell anyone | and people bought new phones when the old ones started | mysteriously slowing down). | dragontamer wrote: | Have you ever used an old flashlight in the 80s or 90s? | | As AA charge fell, the light got dimmer and dimmer. Today, we | have devices that do the exact _OPPOSITE_, pulling the last | bits of electricity out of the cells through boost-converters | or whatnot (boost converters existed back then, but weren't as | efficient or cheap as today). | | Consumers demanded consistent and reliable performance no | matter if at full-battery charge or nearly empty. People | preferred their devices to suddenly "shut off". | silisili wrote: | On the subject of AA alkaline batteries - one thing I learned a | long time ago somehow I'll share that people seem amazed by is | that you can approximate their charge by bouncing them on a hard | surface. Drop an AA battery negative/flat side down an inch or | two onto a hard surface like a counter or table. A new battery | will just land and thud. A dead battery will bounce | repeatedly(you'll hear it more than see it). | iancmceachern wrote: | I wonder what phenomenon is driving this. A spent battery | weighs more? | dragontamer wrote: | The physical chemistry changes as a battery is spent. The | internal chemicals are being converted from one molecule into | another. | | Its not surprising to me that the two different chemicals | have different physical properties. (Elasticity, density, who | knows? They're a fully different chemical once the electrons | move around) | ChrisLomont wrote: | Almost all the mass of a molecule is in atom nuclei, and | these masses do not change under any battery chemistry I've | ever seen. | | The only way to change mass appreciably is to add or remove | atoms from the interior of the battery. | exhilaration wrote: | Previously discussed on HN: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21693423 | ztakeo wrote: | Here's a good reference https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/artic | lelanding/2015/ta/c5ta0... | thescriptkiddie wrote: | IIRC alkaline batteries produce some kind of gas while being | discharged. When the battery is dead it is probably inflated | like an unopened soda can, assuming it hasn't leaked. | jandrese wrote: | Isn't that what the vents holes are for? | icodestuff wrote: | IIRC, new batteries contain a semi-liquid electrolyte, which | damps the bounce. When discharged, it becomes much more | rigid, so the battery bounces. Compare dropping a gallon jug | with ~a cup of water in it vs a cup frozen into ice to see | what i mean. | rytis wrote: | I didn't know that, thanks for sharing! It seems to be a lot | more civilised version of what I was doing for years - test by | licking it... Can do it almost in one gesture: hold the battery | between thumb and middle finger, lick index finger and touch it | on one end of the battery, then lick the other. With some | practice can get pretty good accuracy in 0.5-1.5V range. Bit | barbaric though :) | zh3 wrote: | Let me leap in here to ding Duracell. They used to be my goto | battery, but over the past few years (there was a hedge fund | takeover, which IME rarely results in improvements to long- | standing quality products) they've turned into liabilities - | specifically, they are extremely prone to leaking once even a | little bit discharged. To this day I open old kit and there can | be duracells in there with "use by 2010" or even earlier dates | which are fine, yet far newer batteries (e.g. bought in 2016 with | expiries in 2022) leak like there's no tomorrow for the buyout | team. | | Interested to hear of others experiences, or I've just been | amazingly unlucky. | jasode wrote: | I came across this recent youtube comment[1] on why older | batteries didn't leak. I don't know if it's correct but sharing | it anyway: | | _> ceptimus 2 weeks ago (edited) >> Old alkaline batteries | contained mercury, which made them resistant to leaking. The | mercury was there to absorb the hydrogen gas, which builds | internal pressure when the battery is used, causing them to | leak. Newer alkaline batteries don't have mercury, because it's | harmful to the environment when disposed. Unfortunately, the | mercury free batteries leak much sooner - many of them long | before their 'use by' date, even if you've never used them. Now | you've replaced the batteries, you should check the camera more | frequently. The modern rechargeable Ni-mh batteries, with a low | self-discharge rate, are a good alternative: less likely to | leak; but they're only nominally 1.2 Volts per cell instead of | 1.5 volts, so some equipment won't work with them._ | | EDIT... maybe there's more to it than just mercury because some | low-effort googling[2] found that law prohibiting it in | batteries was 1996 (~25 years ago). That doesn't match the | timeline in the video because Alec says his old batteries (that | didn't leak) were "use-by-date-2016". So maybe something else | was different about the formulation in his Kirkland Signature | batteries circa ~2008. | | [1] | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5s6xerRqVY&lc=UgztQzUKV5BJQ... | | [2] | https://www.google.com/search?q=mercury+removed+from+alkalin... | dv_dt wrote: | After using Duracell for years for applications where I had to | use alkaline, I recently had a set die with major leaks early, | basically ruining a nice LED flashlight. | Spooky23 wrote: | They are expensive, but if you _need_ a primary battery, the | non-rechargeable lithium batteries are great. | | My clock radio backup battery has probably been in there for | >15 years. | pomian wrote: | That possibly explains the mysterious leaking battery problems. | I remember that was an issue over twenty five years ago, which | taught us not to leave batteries in devices. But then we | accepted that they don't leak anymore. Then in the last five | years or so, I keep finding gadgets that are destroyed, or | almost so, from massive battery leaks. And alkalines don't seem | to last very long, even though they are more expensive than | they were. | bxparks wrote: | Yup, I hate Duracell batteries with a passion, they leak like a | wet sponge and destroy electronics. I have converted most of my | batteries to NiMH, but for the few that cannot be | rechargeables, I will go out of the way to buy anything but | Duracells. | cjbgkagh wrote: | Happened to me. Duracell was my goto and now they leak. I don't | know who to trust anymore. Thankfully I'm not a big battery | consumer. | klodolph wrote: | As the article states, NiMH has gotten a lot better, and I | now use that nearly everywhere instead of alkaline. | | It's nice not having to shop for batteries as often. I | plugged in a charger behind the TV and batteries in a drawer | under the TV. With the price point for Eneloop and Duracell | batteries, you break even once you use a rechargeable for the | fourth time. | | Part of the reason I have it in the first place is that the | Roku 4's abysmal remote control goes through a set of | batteries once every three months or so. | tkojames wrote: | Rumor is the Ikea batteries are rebranded Eneloop I have | good luck with them. | bxparks wrote: | This website says that the IKEA brands are equivalent to | the Eneloop Pro and Lite, but not the regular white ones: | | https://eneloop101.com/batteries/rewrapped-batteries/ | | (Scroll/search to "IKEA") | tecleandor wrote: | Seems like at least the AA size, model LADDA 2450mAh. You | can check they're made in Japan. Not sure about the 1900 | mAh, or the AAA size model, it might be a different | brand. | jq-r wrote: | I have a lot of those white ones, and they work great for | years now. They're a steal. | Wistar wrote: | Anyone know who makes the Costco Kirkland brand AAs? | Moru wrote: | Producer likely to change depending on who does them | cheapest at the time. | Scoundreller wrote: | And sometimes varies by region. | justjash wrote: | Same. I pulled down my dad's old camera from the closet a few | years ago and it probably hadn't been used since the 90s so the | batteries were dead. Threw in some new Duracell batteries and | played with it a bit before putting it away. Opened it a year | or two later and the batteries had swelled and leaked | everywhere. Had to use a pair of pliers to extract the swollen | batteries from the battery compartment. Such a huge pain. | jacobolus wrote: | Duracell (the Mallory company) was bought by Dart in 1978, then | by KKR in 1988, Gillette in 1996, Procter & Gamble bought | Gillette in 2005, and Duracell was spun off and bought by | Berkshire Hathaway in 2016. (source: Wikipedia) | | The company has been under large-scale finance / conglomerate | management for more than 4 decades by now. I don't think there | would have been any immediate change in battery quality circa | 2016. Seems just as likely that corner cutting (assuming there | is corner cutting; I have no insight) started before changes of | ownership. | JTbane wrote: | Yep, have the same experience here. Even worse, I have devices | which require batteries to be installed for memory retention, | so I can't really remove all the alkalines to prevent leakage. | jolux wrote: | It wasn't a hedge fund, it was Berkshire Hathaway. | ASalazarMX wrote: | Happened for me too. They were very reliable batteries, now | even new batteries leak if unused for a few years. They have | ruined several remotes that I use sparingly, they should change | their name to Ephemeralcell. | Isthatablackgsd wrote: | Mmm, I recalled I had Duracell (bought in 2018, expire date | 2025) leaked in the battery compartment and I don't use the | device. I just assumed the device was on standby mode and been | draining the battery for a while which caused the leaking. | | That mean I have to be wary of Kirkland AA and AAA Batteries | because they are made by Duracell. This is new for me and I'm | surprised about Duracell, and I am not surprised about hedge | fund/private equity. This is their MO. | siegecraft wrote: | Kirkland batteries were very leaky to the point where I | didn't even finish using the pack I bought. I was quite | dismayed since Kirkland usually has quality products. | CWuestefeld wrote: | More anecdata - I don't have anything to add regarding | Duracell, but I've experienced the same thing you describe with | Energizer. | | Recently I've leaned toward ACDelco batteries, which aren't on | the test list. | wlesieutre wrote: | I had no idea ACDelco made anything other than car parts, | huh. | gunapologist99 wrote: | Curious if you're having these leaks in Duracells you bought | from a big box retail store, or shipped from Amazon. | gerdesj wrote: | You mean ... _gasp_ ... they might be fakes. | | The EU has a quality mark "CE" - Conformite Europeenne. | Sometime the font is a bit wonky and it is alleged that CE in | that case stands for China Export instead. I imagine that | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CE_marking#%22China_Export%22 | is policed quite carefully. | brnt wrote: | I get Duracell Industrials through my works office supplier, | they also leak frequently. | grumpyprole wrote: | Completely agree. Duracell batteries have been leaking | consistently for me, I've stopped buying them and actively warn | others. They have destroyed various remotes, torches and an | expensive camera flash after only a few years. | jhallenworld wrote: | But I think their NIMH batteries are good. Project Farm | reviewed them, they were near the top. Of course I'm looking | for good ones that are cheaper.. | TrainedMonkey wrote: | Anecdata, I recently had to replace batteries in several smoke | alarms. 3 were Duracells and 2 were Rayovacs. All Duracells | were from 2016/2017, i.e. assuming they were installed right | away they lasted around 5 years. Rayovacs were from 2010 and | 2011, despite both brands being rated for 5 years. It is | possible that old Rayovacs were installed around same time as | new Duracells and both lasted around same time, still makes for | an interesting datapoint. | bluGill wrote: | Rayovac was bought out by Energizer not too long ago. They | used to have a 10 year no leak guarantee, now they leak in a | few months as I've learned the hard way. | adenner wrote: | Just as a bit of feedback, for safety equipment like smoke | and CO detectors, standard guidance is to replace the battery | at least once a year. (Unless you have an integrated 10 year | battery that will last the life of the detector) | | If you live in an area that follows Daylight Savings time, | doing it then is best so that you remember. Otherwise doing | it during the Operation Edith drill for Fire Prevention Week | is the next best. | TrainedMonkey wrote: | Does this guidance apply to both battery backup and battery | only situations? | surge wrote: | Someone did a test and found the Costco Kirkland batteries were | not only as good as Duracell, but cheaper and lasted longer. | tablespoon wrote: | > there was a hedge fund takeover, which IME rarely results in | improvements to long-standing quality products | | But think of the shareholder value that was created! | | https://web.archive.org/web/20121120072539/https://www.newyo... | bwbmr wrote: | Same here, lots of leaks-- some family even has had a drawer | full of unexpired Duracells leak. Myself, I've switched over | completely to NiMh except when unsupported by the device to | remove the change of leaks (Nest x Yale door lock in | particular, which detected NiMh as low battery even when 90% of | the cell capacity is remaining). AmazonBasics has been bad with | leaks too. | | Edit: I have a Powerex MH-C980 and that has significantly made | using NiMh easier. Before with a bundled Panasonic charger I | had to charge everything in pairs, 4 max. The Powerex I can | charge 8 cells individually, turbo charge if I'm in a rush, and | see how much energy actually was used if something seems to be | eating through a lot of batteries. | Moru wrote: | Just to clarify your point there: Charging batteries as pairs | is what kills the rechargeable batteries. There is no way for | the charger to keep track of both batteries at the same time | so it just charges until both should be done. | | If one of them is bad, the charger will kill the other one | too. If they are differently charged, it will kill one of the | batteries and next time it will kill the other battery. (Kill | as in make worse and worse until it finaly doesn't charge at | all.) | | I have mostly stopped using rechargeable AA and AAA batteries | because of the bad quality of the last ones I bought. They | took 3-5 charges before dying with a good charger that does | all batteries separately. | MaKey wrote: | Modern chargers are microprocessor controlled and are able | to keep track of each battery individually. | zackees wrote: | Also, NiMH batteries can reverse charge and ruin | themselves. This happens a lot when batteries are in series | and the load will continue to run the batteries until 0 | voltage. The weakest battery will deplete first but then | the other batteries will continue to pump current through | until that weak battery reverses polarity and wrecks | itself. | reiichiroh wrote: | Anyone remember the rechargeable alkaline brand "Pure Energy" | available in Canada? | moreati wrote: | Note, this is from 2016. | CamperBob2 wrote: | Indeed, and one major change that's taken place in the last few | years is that Energizers are now as leak-prone as Duracells. | Likely true of other brands as well. The only way to win the | alkaline battery game is not to play. | colanderman wrote: | Re: constant current appliances, most any "digital" appliance | that uses a linear regulator (as opposed to a DC-DC converter) | will exhibit such a load profile. | zw123456 wrote: | This is really amazing work, I found part 3 to be the most | interesting https://goughlui.com/2016/12/19/great-aa-alkaline- | battery-te... particularly the mwh/$ and other charts like | capacity vs. weight etc. | zwieback wrote: | I know what I'll pick up next time I'm at IKEA. | wrjensen wrote: | I have had the same issues with Duracell leakage. I won't buy | them any more, for exactly that reason. | RicoElectrico wrote: | There's also http://lygte-info.dk/ which has a ton of battery and | charger tests. Definitely worth reading. | walrus01 wrote: | something that didn't exist in 2016 and does now, are AA | batteries that are composed of an internal lithium ion cell, a | DC-DC converter for 1.5VDC output to the end terminals, and | internal 5V-USB to li-ion charge controller circuitry. | | With a USB port literally built into the body of the battery. | They're more expensive, but can pay for themselves... | | https://www.amazon.com/AA-Batteries-ANVOW-Rechargeable-Capac... | | there are lots of other models if you search for "AA battery | lithium ion USB" | | I would recommend these over anything that is NiMH based (memory | effect) or needs a proprietary charger. | intrasight wrote: | I'd seen those in the past. Prices have come down. Am curious | what are the benefits over NiMN. | warpech wrote: | Also see this impressive test: | https://anrieff.net/batterytest/index_en.html (European market) | zoomablemind wrote: | Chiming in, I just recently was wondering how two seemingly equal | by chemistry and size batteries just from different mfgrs could | be so much incomparable by practical life-times. | | On so many occasions Panasonic or Sony (Japan made) batteries | which come included with devices (like remote controls etc) would | last years (!) (in some odd case I had Sony AA battery functional | after more than a decade), yet any recent replacements from | Duracel or Energizer the ones bought from a pharmacy would get | exhausted within a year of similar use. | | There must be some difference there, just how to tell what is | that? | LeoPanthera wrote: | There's very little reason to continue using Alkalines in the | majority of cases. Rechargeable batteries both last longer, and, | perhaps even more importantly, do not leak. | johndough wrote: | Rechargeable batteries (assuming NiMH and Ni-Cd) can still | leak, but usually the leakage is less severe. | Maarten88 wrote: | As a test I recently bought a pair of Li-ion AA batteries, that | are recharged through a micro USB connector in the battery. They | are rated 2880 mWh and are advertised to provide a flat 1.5v | during the whole discharge cycle (they have internal circuitry to | convert from the native 3.7v). | | I wonder how those compare to my current rotating stock of Ni-MH | ones that regularly stop working. Jury is still out, they were | considerably more expensive though (something like EUR4.50 a | piece). | discreditable wrote: | I have some similar Li-ion AA batteries for my Blink cameras. | They work very well since the Blinks hate ni-mh batteries. | Interestingly, these behave oddly in my camera speedlite. They | can't seem to charge the flash, and the LCD flickers while on. | My best guess is the charging the flash capacitor pulls more | juice than the lithium batteries can handle. Thankfully, ni-mh | work great. | | For your Ni-mh that stop working, if they won't charge you can | sort of jump start them using a good battery and they'll charge | again. Use some aluminum foil strips and touch the contacts | between the batteries together for a few seconds. Positive to | positive, negative to negative if I remember correctly. | wmorein wrote: | Apologies for the slightly off topic question but can anyone | point me to the best test/comparison of Alkaline batteries vs. | the new Lithium rechargeable ones? Older rechargeable AA and AAA | batteries were terribly short lived and so mostly useless but I | assume Lithium ones are much better? | dragontamer wrote: | > the new Lithium rechargeable ones | | Lithium isn't rechargable. (Lithium AA cells are very long-life | but very expensive. One-time use. Lithium-ion are rechargable, | but are 3.7 volts and completely violate the AA spec) | | NiMH is the chemistry for rechargable AA / AAA cells, since its | 1.35V and "close enough" to the old 1.5V standard alkaline. | | > Older rechargeable AA and AAA batteries were terribly short | lived and so mostly useless but I assume Lithium ones are much | better? | | "Older", circa 00s NiMH chemistries had more energy storage | (!!!). The issue was that circa 00s cells had a "self- | discharge" problem, meaning they ran out of energy in just a | few months (like 1 to 3 months). | | Panasonic solved the problem with "Low Self Discharge" cells, | aka "Eneloop", which started to come out in the late 00s. This | chemistry had much less capacity, but took over a year before | the energy went bad. | | Its still NiMH chemistry, but just tweaked to focus on the | self-discharge problem rather than energy-storage numbers / | benchmarks. | | With Eneloop taking the market by storm (especially popular | with XBox users, which used AA rechargables), other companies | also came out with LSD chemistries. These days, almost | everything you'll find is of the LSD-type. | rabf wrote: | You can get lithium ion rechargable AA batteries these days. | They have a built in regulator to drop the voltage to 1.5V. | Some of them even have micro usb ports on the side for | charging. | walrus01 wrote: | there are even USB-C ones now for people who have less | microUSB 5VDC charge cables hanging around their home... | wmorein wrote: | Ah, I totally misunderstood the current state of thing. But | happy I asked -- thanks for all the info. | Zak wrote: | Here's one: https://lygte- | info.dk/review/batteries2012/CommonAAIndividua... | | Note the small link near the top titled "Comparator" if you | want to generate comparison graphs between different batteries. | | 1.5V Li-ion rechargeable AAs are 3.7V cells with DC-DC buck | converters attached to reduce the voltage. The main reason to | use them is poorly-designed[0] devices that don't play well | with NiMH. There may be some standby power drain from the | electronics, and these are less compatible with voltage-based | battery status monitoring than NiMH (NiMH gives a false low | reading; bucked Li-ion gives a constant false full reading). | | Modern low-self-discharge NiMH has very good performance and | shelf-life; the white Panasonic Eneloop is the gold standard in | this category; the black ones have higher capacity, but wear | out in fewer charge cycles. | | [0] Even if designing for alkaline without NiMH support isn't a | design flaw per se, a device that doesn't work at 1.2V leaves | about half the energy stored in an alkaline unused. | tzs wrote: | I've been a bit puzzled by the 1.5 V lithium AA batteries I see | on Amazon. They say they are a constant 1.5 V all the way from | 100% charged to 0% charged. | | With the battery presenting a constant voltage, wouldn't that | make battery level displays useless? They rely on the voltage | declining as the battery discharges. With a constant 1.5 V | battery your device is going to say the battery is full right | up until it suddenly stops. | | I'd expect that to get very annoying. | | Edit: I mean the 1.5 V lithium rechargeable AA batteries, like | these: https://www.amazon.com/Deleepow-Rechargeable-Lithium- | Batteri... | grumbel wrote: | The AA lithium-ion rechargeable are internally 3.7V, just | like any other lithium-ion battery. They have a buck | converter build-in that regulates that down to a constant | 1.5V. Which can be handy in the handful of applications that | don't deal with the 1.2V that NiMH provide. This does in turn | make battery indicators indeed completely useless for many of | them, as there is no detectable drop in voltage from the | outside of the battery. | | However, there are newer ones take care of that and regulate | the voltage down to 1.1V or so shortly before they run | completely out of juice, so that the battery indicator can | give a warning. Don't know how widespread that feature is | yet, but it exists. | dragontamer wrote: | When in doubt, https://data.energizer.com/ | | For Lithium chemistry: | https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/l91.pdf | | That's Energizer's Lithium of course, but you can expect that | competitors probably perform "similarly". | | ------ | | You can see that Energizer Lithium is 1.7V, slightly more | than the 1.5V found in typical Alkaline cells. Today's | electronics are pretty flexible however, and this may not be | an issue. (In practice, AA-devices are usually designed for | 1.35V NiMH, 1.5V Alkaline, and 1.7V... but there are some | devices that have made 1.5V assumptions and _ONLY_ work with | Alkaline) | tzs wrote: | Oops. I meant 1.5 V rechargeable lithium AA batteries, but | left out "rechargeable". I've edited my comment to fix | this. | | The 1.5 V rechargeable lithium batteries couple a | rechargeable lithium cell with a buck converter to drop the | voltage to 1.5 V. | | I haven't seen any that are sophisticated enough to use a | variable output buck converter and drop the voltage as the | underlying battery discharges. | bradfa wrote: | I've not seen AA or AAA sized lithium rechargeable batteries | but modern low-self-discharge NiMH AA and AAA cell batteries | are quite good today. The Panasonic Eneloop brand are generally | widely available and good value for money. The AA size Eneloops | are generally around 2100mAh and the AAA size around 900mAh. | | The only downside to modern NiMH batteries today seems to be | finding a good and easy to use charger which will properly | discharge and/or cycle the batteries without requiring a human | to fiddle with it or understand charge rates and when to | discharge the cell prior to charging. | dragontamer wrote: | > The only downside to modern NiMH batteries today seems to | be finding a good and easy to use charger which will properly | discharge and/or cycle the batteries without requiring a | human to fiddle with it or understand charge rates and when | to discharge the cell prior to charging. | | Only if you're really babying your NiMH cells is it | worthwhile to do this. | | ----- | | Frankly, my recommendation is to just throw away NiMH cells | once they "go bad" (maybe a discharge/recharge cycle will | save them, but they're really not that expensive). | | For most consumers out there, the $10 trickle charge that | takes 8+ hours is superior, because they'll never cycle the | NiMH cells to death. How many dozens of charge/recharge | cycles do you need before there's an issue, even with the | most primitive of charging strategies? | | When it takes months for a typical AA powered appliance to | run out of NiMH charge, you realize that these "dozens" of | charge/discharge cycles gives a life-span measured in _YEARS_ | for these NiMH cells. | | After 5 years, your NiMH cells might be on its last legs, | needing a full discharge/recharge to get back to full power. | Then and only then should you consider a $30 charger to | perform this resurrection, except its probably more cost- | efficient to just spend $2 and throw away the "old" cell. | | You'll need to throw away $20 worth of cells (ie: 10 cells) | before your $30 fancy charger with discharge/recharge cycles | + coulomb counting is superior to the $10 crap trickle | charger. Maybe an RC-car enthusiast will get there (or an | electronic-hobbyist), but that's a _LOT_ of charge/recharge | cycles before you reach this point. Even with the inferior | $10 trickle charge design. | | ------- | | EDIT: That being said, spending $30, $40, or $50 on a higher- | end charger because you find it "cool" is probably | worthwhile. Coolness is a factor and we're not really talking | about a lot of money here. But the $10 charger + buy new | cells as needed approach is probably the most cost-effective | strategy. | jerlam wrote: | There are AA and AAA sized lithium ion rechargables, but they | won't work in anything that uses alkalines, since they | provide a very different voltage (3.7V). They are usually | called 10440 (AAA-sized) and 14500 (AA-sized). | | There are AA and AAA lithium _primary_ batteries that provide | 1.5V and are in stores, but they cannot be recharged. They | are far superior than alkalines in most ways, especially in | the cold, but they cost drastically more, around $1-2 each. | I've switched many of my low-drain applications to these | batteries, where they are likely to outlast the device | without leaking and destroying it. | tzs wrote: | There are now 1.5 V lithium rechargeable AAs. Here's a | typical example [1], and there are a ton of others. | | I am almost certain they are implemented as 3.7 V lithium | rechargeable batteries combined with a buck converter to | get the 1.5 V output. | | I think they are relatively new. I don't recall noticing | them a few years ago, which was the last time I was looking | for rechargeable AA batteries. | | [1] https://www.amazon.com/Deleepow-Rechargeable-Lithium- | Batteri... | rdl wrote: | Duracell used to be really good about replacing devices if their | batteries leaked. They screwed me a couple years ago and refused | to replace something (a $50 apple keyboard, I think they gave me | $10 for it?). I went from buying exclusively Duracell for | alkaline to now just buying Energizer Lithium for everything | where it isn't specifically contraindicated (very rare). | zh3 wrote: | Yes, I too have switched to Energizer - zero problems to date | (switched from Duracell some years ago). | Normille wrote: | Check out 'Project Farm' on YouTube for a couple more in-depth | tests of AA batteries | | TLDR: | | Made in Japan = GOOD Made in China = BAD | Isthatablackgsd wrote: | I love how he made it clear where it was assembled in. Every | time he said "Made in USA with Global Components!", I was like | yea more like made in China and rebranded in USA. | csdvrx wrote: | We need a new slogan: "rebranded in USA with a total lack of | pride" | CamperBob2 wrote: | Spoiler: they're all obsolete cost-reduced leaky pieces of shit. | Use Eneloops or other NiMH rechargeables when possible, lithium | primary cells otherwise. | | For a while you could avoid leakage by steering clear of Duracell | in favor of Energizer, but that's no longer true. _Do not use | alkaline AAs or AAAs in any equipment you want to keep._ | dragontamer wrote: | I think the main issue with AA Alkaline is the proliferation of | cheap low-self-discharge NiMH cells (aka: Eneloop, but also | Energizer and other brands have good LSD NiMH available). | | A huge number of appliances seem to be designed for the 1.35V | NiMH chemistry now. Perhaps a random TV-remote still prefers | Alkaline but most seem to work fine with NiMH. | | ----- | | Buying a pack of 20 NiMH cells and rotating your collection | between charging / discharging states is cheap enough and | effective. Its like you have "infinite" AAs since you can just | keep recharging them. | | EDIT: A few years ago, Alkaline was still needed for TV remotes. | But most Low-self-discharge NiMH now lasts for over a year | without self-discharging away. Sure, not as good as Alkaline's | 10-year life span but surely 1+ year lifespans is good enough for | your TV remote? Its not that big of a hassle to reach recharge | your NiMH once a year is it? | djrogers wrote: | That works well until you have kids running around... You going | to put rechargeable cells in that Elena of Avalor wand your 4 | year old chases the dog with? And her talking unicorn? How | about all the light sabers? | | In my experience, most of those types of toys don't go through | batteries fast enough to justify a NiMH - they'd be in there | for years. Invariably one of the kids will wind up mixing | NiMH/LiIon/Alkaline in a toy, then the rechargeable winds up in | the recycling bin a year later. | | Fast forward 3 years, and your "infinite" AAs are all gone, | lost, or in near-permanent use somewhere you can never | identify, and you've wasted all that money. | | In a few years when the kids move out and, and the number of | battery powered gizmos is down to a manageable number, I'll try | it again - until then, Amazon Basics AAA/AA are my friend. | klodolph wrote: | > A huge number of appliances seem to be designed for the 1.35V | NiMH chemistry now. | | Yes, this is my experience too. One of the problems with NiMH | is that appliances have helpful low-battery indicators which | might light up as soon as you put NiMH cells in them, even | though the appliance might continue working for a long time | yet. A prime example is the Nintendo Game Boy Advance, which | was released in 2001. The thing is powered by switching | regulators which work fine with the lower voltages of NiMH | cells! | | Newer appliances have solved these problems. For example, the | Yamaha PSS-A50 (a fantastic, inexpensive portable keyboard) has | an option to configure the low-battery indicator for alkaline | or NiMH chemistry. | ace2358 wrote: | Totally agree! My Game Boy Advanced power light is green for | about an hour then red for hours and hours on my eneloops. | Also my Tascam field recorder has the option for alkaline or | NiMH batteries. | | I still have some kitchen scales that won't work with NiMH | though :( | | I've had my energiser batteries for almost 10 years and I've | been rotating them through devices and the charger. Only | recently have I begun to lose some cells. | | Time to upgrade them all to eneloops!! | mikepurvis wrote: | A quick googling reveals nothing, but I wonder if a simple | hardware mod could address this-- basically, identify the | voltage divider that's doing the measurement across the | battery and change out one of the resistors so that it | "sees" 1.35V as 1.5V. | | Most GBA battery mod posts are about people upgrading units | to have built-in lithium packs, USB-C charge ports, etc | etc. | dragontamer wrote: | Nope. | | Alkaline at 100% charge is 1.5V, at 50% charge it's 1.2V, | at 0% charge it's .9V. | | NiMH at 100% charge is 1.35V, at 50% charge it's 1.35V, | at 0% charge it's like 1.2V | | Totally different discharge curves. There's no simple | circuit to convert between the two. | | ----- | | EDIT: For hard data, see: | | Energizer NiMH : | https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/nh15-2300gl1220.pdf | | Energizer Alkaline: | https://data.energizer.com/pdfs/e91gl0320.pdf | mikepurvis wrote: | Oh yeah, I'm aware that for any other chemistry you need | an actual coulomb-counter to get a proper gas gauge. My | suggestion was more about the specific matter of | suppressing an unwanted and inaccurate low battery light. | | Though maybe instead of trying to mod the circuit board, | it would be easier to just disconnect the LED itself. | dragontamer wrote: | Honestly, Eneloop's advantage is overstated these days. | | Amazon Basics is likely an older Eneloop design for example | (Panasonic makes eneloop, and seems to be making Amazon- | Basic NiMHs). Energizer's "AA Recharge" series is also LSD | these days, and probably easier to source than Eneloop. | | Eneloop deserves credit for shifting the market-perception | on NiMHs a decade ago. But the other companies have caught | on and have created well functioning, low-self-discharge | chemistries of their own by now. | | ------- | | I'd recommend "whatever is cheapest to ship to you". | Energizer mostly for me, since I buy from Walmart / Home | Depot (etc. etc.). A lot of people buy from Amazon, so | "Amazon Basics" tacked onto your next order is probably a | good idea. | | Eneloop commands a higher price and has some advantages. | But I find that Energizer / Amazon Basics are both good | enough for me. | Gigachad wrote: | One interesting solution I saw was batteries which stick a | lithium battery + charge controller / voltage adapter inside | the AA package so they can be used on any device. | justinator wrote: | Thankfully my not so new handheld Garmin GPS unit has a | specific NiMH battery mode. I'm sure it just changes the | algorthm slightly to work with the NiMH's discharge rate. | dragontamer wrote: | > Newer appliances have solved these problems. For example, | the Yamaha PSS-A50 (a fantastic, inexpensive portable | keyboard) has an option to configure the low-battery | indicator for alkaline or NiMH chemistry. | | Different NiMH chemistries have slightly different voltage | curves. | | Its an insidious problem. Different brands of NiMH just | discharges in a "flat" manner, and all of them are at | slightly different voltages. The electronics assume a voltage | curve of Eneloop (typically, since Eneloop is the most | popular NiMH brand), and other brands with their slightly | different voltage-curves will throw it off. | | ----------- | | I find it more important to locally source NiMH batteries | (ie: what I can buy from Walmart / Home Depo down the street, | rather than paying for Amazon shipping) rather than | standardizing upon the Eneloops that everyone else is buying, | lol. | | When I need a new AA cell, I buy it in my typical shopping | runs, rather than waiting for shipping. I don't care enough | about the voltage-curve problem to mass buy Eneloops yet. I | largely just accept that the "low-battery" indicators are | perpetually wrong. | vzaliva wrote: | I've switched to rechargables for home electronics years ago. | It makes me feel better doing my share of lessening environment | impact caused by disposable cells. | | One notable exception for which I am still buying alkaine | batteries is the August Smart Lock. When using NiMH batteries | it starts complaining about depleted battery in a week, while | it still Ok and works for much longer. It was reported to them | and they advised to us alkaine. This is very annoying because | all they need to do is to fix the software which does the | voltage check and generates annoying notifications to the | users. Just a few lines of code (or maybe single constant) | could have an immence environment impact. | Scoundreller wrote: | I think this explains the problem, though If you could | configure the battery type, a software fix would work: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29910710#29912483 | zwieback wrote: | I agree, rotating collection of charged cells is the way to go | but: | | - need to establish a system of keeping track what's charged | | - train family to participate | | - train family to stop buying alkaline (mainly because in the | alkaline recycling process you'll lose a lot of your eneloops) | | - grow immunity against complaints from family | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > - need to establish a system of keeping track what's | charged | | This seems to be the root of all of your problems. | | Just charge all of the cells that aren't in use. | | When you take drained cells out of something, they go in the | charger. | | Charger is always plugged in and right next to where you | store the cells. | | If there's ever any question, just stick the cells in the | charger. Don't bother playing all of the games to avoid | "memory effect". It's much better with modern cells and not | worth the hassle to try to work around. | devnulll wrote: | The good chargers hold 8-16 batteries, so there's always a | set on there being charged. The chargers seem electrically | smart and maintain the batteries well. | | This process works wonderfully. We've got ~100 Enloop's of | various generations around the house in TV Remotes, XBox | Remotes, Garage Door openers, and toys. This process works | well. | r00fus wrote: | Not to mention a LOT of items now come with non-removable | (mostly rechargeable) Li-Ion or NIMH batteries. Even small toys | which used to require external batteries now come with it. | | So I still have a small stack of alkaline batteries from 2017 I | haven't replaced or depleted. Hopefully that stack remains | untouched for another few years as well. | mikepurvis wrote: | Replying to boost this. We love Eneloop and have probably 40-50 | of them in the house at this point, between remote controls, | gamepads, children's toys, fairy lights, bike lighting, tools, | etc etc. They all get funneled through a La Crosse charger with | a simple two-bin depleted/charged system. | | We've been buying them for years and I think I've only ever | disposed of one that was unwilling to take a charge. | lmilcin wrote: | I design some electronics in my spare time. As a user, I | strongly prefer to have a choice of using a rechargeable | battery. It somehow does not feel right to throw out a toxic | battery when I could have another type potentially hundreds of | times over many years. | | It helps that there is a proliferation of quite powerful, low | voltage, low power chips. | | Some of the devices I design have USB interface which gives | another option of charging the battery while it is connected. | | I am currently working on a fully programmable mechanical | USB/Bluetooth keyboard. It will work off of two AA NiMh | rechargeable batteries and I plan these to be recharged any | time the keyboard is connected to the computer. | dragontamer wrote: | I'd assume that 3-cells could lead to a simple trickle-charge | circuit? | | 3*1.35 == 4.05V, which is pretty close to the 5V power that | you take from the USB, seems like there's enough room to get | a regulator to turn 5V into a simple charging circuit. | There'd also be enough output to probably run 3.3V circuits | with a simple regulator. | | 4*1.35 == 5.4V, which is beyond the capacity for 5V to charge | (unless you got a boost-converter). | | --- | | 2-cells == 2.7V, which means you probably need a boost- | converter to convert the battery-pack into something useful? | | Not that I'm the designer or anything, but I like discussing | these issues :-) I haven't done any electronics since my | college days. | | What voltage does the device operate at? The main cutoffs | these days seem to be 1.8V, 3.3V, and 5V right? 3-cells and | targeting 3.3V + charging from a USB (at 5V) seems like the | most obvious cutoff to me personally. | lmilcin wrote: | Newer STM32 lines go as far down as 1.7V. Or they would if | I was able to find other chips (notably Bluetooth) that | would suit me and could pull the same trick. As it stands, | the circuit can work down to ~1.85V which is still quite | comfortable with two cells. | | I admit there is no particular reason to use 2 cells where | I could use 3 (they would still fit comfortably inside | keyboard enclosure). The only reason is vanity -- I hope it | will look sexier to other EEs:) | | I dislike built in cells. I like ability to just change | batteries rather than have to plug in to charge. Nothing | worse than a peripheral like headphones that you have to | stop using just because charge ran out. Why do I need to | finish my couch session just because my keyboard can't take | a simple AA battery or two? Seems like completely | unnecessary nuisance. | | Also, if you are talking about cell voltage, you need to | remember they loose voltage very quickly upon discharging | and most of the discharging happens at much lower than max | voltage. For NiMh you really want to make sure that your | circuit works with at least 1.2V per cell (as an absolute | minimum, in perfect conditions of room temperature and very | low discharge). Any higher than that and you aren't | actually discharging the cells properly and are not using | their capacity. | | If your circuit works in short bursts of high current or | can be used outdoors, be prepared that the voltage can drop | very quickly especially when the cell is older (has been | through a lot of cycles). | jandrese wrote: | Most of my remotes are still using the batteries they shipped | with. It's hard to make the case for replacing batteries when | the originals last 15+ years (and counting). | Gigachad wrote: | A youtuber I watch recently made the case that NiMH batteries | should be used for _all_ uses because alkaline batteries will | eventually burst and spew acid over your electronics. Sounds | like it could take a very long time to do that, but it makes | sense just for the preservation of the device to use NiMH. | divbzero wrote: | I finally switched to Duracell's rechargeable NiMH batteries | last year and won't be going back to alkaline. They work well | even for things like flashlights that need low self-discharge, | and I no longer feel like I'm creating waste every time I burn | through a battery. | | I also came across some rechargeable lithium batteries packaged | in 1.5V AAA, AA, C, D form factors, but they appeared to be | newer and I was unsure about long-term reliability. | piyh wrote: | The only thing I keep disposable batteries for is my key code | door lock | SavantIdiot wrote: | +1 for introducing me to the B&K 8600. It never occurred to me to | search for a DC load device. I've been building FET-based loads | and using a power supply to calibrate them. /smacks forehead/ | This is what you miss when you don't get to work with | professionals on your hobbies (i.e., building low power IoT | sensors for funsies). | symby wrote: | Not included in this analysis is leakage rate... by which I mean | ooze leakage. | | I have found that some batteries have a much greater likelihood | of leaking ooze than others (yeah Rayovak, I'm looking at you!) | | Except in the case of crappy toys, the damage that this causes | radically outstrips the cost of the battery. | | As a result, I buy batteries not based on electrical performance, | but track record in not ruining the things I put them into. I am | very happy to accept 50% less energy if I can avoid destroying my | $200 gadget. | mitchbob wrote: | > As a result, I buy batteries not based on electrical | performance, but track record in not ruining the things I put | them into. | | So do I. I'm now using low self-discharge NiMH batteries | (mostly Eneloops) in pretty much every device that uses | batteries, and I've never had one leak. I also use smart | chargers to check battery health when I recharge them. A bit | more initial outlay, but much cheaper in the long run, as the | batteries can be recharged 1000s of times, and they hold their | charge for many months. | jvanderbot wrote: | Does anyone know of a good rechargeable battery comparison test? | I've noticed that some 18650's are just crap after a couple | charges, and some dinky AA batteries last forever after many | charges. | SomewhatLikely wrote: | Project Farm has a video with tests: | https://youtu.be/-jXQNY6rve8 | arendtio wrote: | I am very happy with my Eneloops. I used Ansmanns before (and | still use the Ansmann recharge device), but they died after | like 20 cycles (note: those Ansmanns were models from before | the low-self-discharge era). | | The Eneloops are 3 years old and still work fine while being | used every day (recharge about once per week). | 0cVlTeIATBs wrote: | https://lygte-info.dk is a good site. | aidenn0 wrote: | Amazon Basics low-self-discharge batteries are fine. | | Eneloop if you want to avoid giving Amazon money and don't mind | paying more for the brand. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-12 23:00 UTC)