[HN Gopher] I automated my job over a year ago and haven't told ... ___________________________________________________________________ I automated my job over a year ago and haven't told anyone Author : TriNetra Score : 459 points Date : 2022-01-19 15:24 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (old.reddit.com) (TXT) w3m dump (old.reddit.com) | disambiguation wrote: | hot take: this is basically UBI in practice. | | "different people have different opinions" but it's funny to see | the cognitive dissonance. Lots of hate ITT for anti-work, yet HN | is usually a hotbed for pro UBI sentiment. | bee_rider wrote: | How is it UBI in practice? It is not uniform, and the guy makes | $92k which in most areas is well above what a person would | require basic income. | disambiguation wrote: | Just in the sense that a job was displaced by automation, so | the worker is collecting a check from someone wealthy that | benefits from said automation. | themodelplumber wrote: | These are fun to read. I laughed at the one where the guy shared | a photo of his bong and TV setup at home. One of his major | innovations was creating appropriately-named folders for his | work. And seriously, a lot of businesses don't know how to get | _that_ organized. They are good at other stuff. | | Also noteworthy IMO are the jobs you don't need to automate--just | bring yourself, do your normal thing with baseline effort for a | couple weeks max, and suddenly you're two months ahead and | C-levels are 1) telling you essentially "stop working so hard" | and also 2) "we think you are a partnership candidate if you can | do this for 10 more years." | brimble wrote: | As far as I can tell from listening to stories from friends who | aren't in tech circles, sorta halfway knowing how to use a | computer still makes you a wizard in most non-tech offices. And | the newer generations are only barely better than the old ones, | on average, so _that 's_ not putting an end to that state of | things. | | I'm talking, like, you understand how external drives are | represented, know how to cut & paste files & kinda know what a | filesystem is and how it's laid out (not what a FAT table is or | anything like that, I mean just how folders and links/shortcuts | practically work and such). If you can do more than basic | arithmetic in Excel, you're basically god. If you can write | batch scripts (like this person, assuming it's true) or a | little glue-code python, that's beyond what the others around | you could even _imagine_. | | I'm not sure whether this is a UX failure or there's just too | much necessary complexity to make things better. To some degree | I think the basic metaphors we use for representing computer | concepts and UI to ordinary users are badly underdeveloped, or | in some way misguided. Certainly I think the "iOS is dumbing | things down and making people unable to compute!" folks have | things exactly backwards. | bittercynic wrote: | This rings very true for me, but I think the disconnect is | often an inability to formalize any task. Seems like often | the same people who can't get a computer to do what they want | also can't write coherent instructions for another human to | do what they want. | themodelplumber wrote: | Yeah, that's really the direction to look in--the people | themselves, what they're expressing in their way of work, and | how they perceive their value. | | I used to do some psychometric testing for work and was | mentored about "tech people" in terms of their/our | psychology. When most people sort themselves by interest, | they indicate a preference against technology, which can also | be described as "novel organizations of things." But they | also indicate against tech by indicating pro-other-stuff | interests. | | So you can still find lots of offices full of non-tech people | where people are organized, but using yesteryear's tech, i.e. | yesterday's organizations of things. Plus they are using | their other strengths. | | From a tech POV though, that inclusive view of others' | strengths is sometimes overlooked, and it's an unfortunate | truth that the tech-wise are somewhat naturally blinded to | others' preferred leverage points in doing business. | | For example, the ability to give responsive, personal | customer service. That service may involve some tech people, | but the person giving the service may be at a significant | advantage if they don't have a tech background, and have some | improvisational or emotional-spectrum talent, or other | reasonable problem-solving tools where tech would otherwise | fill the skill gap. | | I always thought it was interesting stuff... | honkycat wrote: | I'm always shocked by the lack of ambition from my friends who | land "low-effort" office jobs where they aren't doing much. | | Personally, I would: | | 1. Work on personal projects to build skills for something I | actually care about | | 2. Study until I get a new non-boring job. | | I would lose my mind if I had to do nothing but play video games | all day. I struggle to fill the hours AFTER work! I can't imagine | doing nothing. | draw_down wrote: | jakub_g wrote: | If the story is true, the most impressive part is that he managed | to write it as .bat! | geraldwhen wrote: | I've done this twice, but I was open about it. Once someone was | fired, and the second time I was moved into a better dev position | than where I was at. | | In the end it worked out, but people did get fired or not | replaced. | eckesicle wrote: | My sister got a 9 month gig with the local municipality to copy- | paste cells from a folder of 1000s of source excel sheets (with | some transformations) into a master Excel sheet. | | They paid her per entry and she was supposed to do 200 entries | per day. By the end of the first week she'd automated the entire | thing with a script that did just that. | | So she ran that script every morning for nine months and spent | most of the days biking, hiking, and swimming. | neom wrote: | "For a while I felt guilty, like I was ripping the law-firm off, | but eventually I convinced myself that as long as everyone is | happy there's no harm done. I'm doing exactly what they hired me | to do, all of the work is done in a timely manner, and I get to | enjoy my life. Win win for everyone involved. " | | Not a win for the COO/GM/CFO/FP&A/whatever who is tasked with | finding efficiencies in the business and doing optimization. By | staying silent he is denying the business the ability to optimize | it's cogs, and therefore effectively stealing for the business. | wonderwonder wrote: | Are you really saying that the poster should tell them about | his script, which they will then take and use, removing the | need for OP? So OP who as far as anyone at the firm is | concerned is doing a terrific job should sacrifice his position | and take a financial hit so that the COO/GM can get a nice | bonus? That makes no sense at all. | neom wrote: | Actually he should have discussed it with others in the | company as he went, given that chance has passed... Sans your | hyperbole, that is indeed what I am saying. OP most certainly | should discuss how he is executing his job with his employer, | if they say it's fine, cool... but that should be their | choice, business does not happen in a vacuum, it's a team of | people working together. He's taking it upon himself to | decide what work needs to be done for the business, that's | unfair to the rest of the team. | wonderwonder wrote: | how is he taking it on himself to decide what work needs to | be done? He was hired to perform a set of tasks, and has | written a script to accomplish them. You could argue he has | taken it upon himself to decide how the required work is | done and then one could say "so what?". If the business is | happy with his output then everyone is a winner. To think | its an employees job to suicide their employment is not the | actions a rational actor takes. If that is the case, OP | would be incentivized to destroy his script and return the | prior method of manually processing files which he | specified was not keeping pace with business needs. Society | has reached a strange place when bottom of the food chain | employees are expected to suffer financial hardship for the | good of the company execs. | neom wrote: | Employees are resources to the business, as the work | changes, the resources change, it's not his job to decide | how he should be resourced in the business. It's | literally why HR is called HR. | [deleted] | antihero wrote: | If an employee is a resource, what exactly do they owe | them? Why should a "resource" have any sort of respect | _at all_. It 's fundamentally adversarial - the resource | must maximise their gain from their position and the | company most maximise their gain from their "resource". | You're just sour that the resource is winning for _once_. | wonderwonder wrote: | Friend what you are suggesting is a very slippery slope | and leads to employees not making any suggestions at all | to improve business processes as its not part of their | job description. You are essentially saying that OP would | be better off just never attempting to automate the | process at all and to just continue the existing process | that was not working after all its the role of whoever is | in charge of efficiency to come up with better solutions. | The business would still experience delays but OP would | not be "stealing". Your position actually incentivizes | employees to work as slowly as possible as long as they | meet the letter of their employment contract. | neom wrote: | "Hey folks, I'm going to implement this script, I'm | concerned in doing so, you will just fire me and keep the | script, I enjoy my job and working with you all, is there | a way we can find additional tasks for me to do in the | business" is a fine conversation to have with your | manager, sure.. you don't have to, but in my humble | opinion, then pretending you're not stealing from the | company knowing what you know, is questionable at best. | wonderwonder wrote: | ok, lets go with that. What happens when the manager says | "yes, implement the script and then we are going to fire | you". What if Op refuses to implement the script then and | just quits? A logical employee with rational self | interest would never have that conversation because they | know it likely ends with their termination. So in reality | your proposal actually leads to the employee never | implementing or recommending the script for fear of | losing their job and the employer continuing to suffer as | the prior manual process leads to missed deadlines. Your | suggestion can only end with a lose / lose scenario. This | is a prisoners dilemma where OP is incentivized not to | discuss his solution with the employer and is really his | only rational option. | neom wrote: | Fire the employee and hire someone off fiver to look at | the script and explain it, and then get an intern to run | it once a week. If the script isn't written, I now know I | can hire a consultant to write the script once. Sounds | like a win for me. | | Except that's not how it would play out in one of my | orgs, I'd chat with the employee and find a solution, if | they're not excited about ANY other work in my business | at all, I'm not sure they are a good fit for my business. | As big boy buffet said. Price is what you pay, but value | is what you get, the terms of that deal should be pretty | clear imo. | Sohcahtoa82 wrote: | I've read through this thread and you're doing a pretty | poor job of convincing me the employee should speak up. | | The employee has two choices: | | 1. Say nothing and keep collecting a paycheck. | | 2. Speak up about the script and start a conversation | that has the possibility of leading towards termination. | | It's a pretty big no-brainer for what they should do. | neom wrote: | The employee can do as they please, in fact I'm not even | saying I disagree with the employee. I'm saying to call | it win-win is patently false if it's being kept a secret, | they cannot know it's win-win while also lie about it. | Everyone else is using my comment as a way to make a dig | a capitalism, fine, no problem... but as the system is | structure, what the redditor said is not true, it is not | necessary win win. | wonderwonder wrote: | "Fire the employee and hire someone off fiver to look at | the script" This is exactly why the employee is | incentivized not to tell his employer. whether he | voluntarily discloses how the script works or not there | is a pretty good chance he loses his job as soon as he | reveals its existence even if management is thrilled | about it and tells him what a great job he has done. | | "in one of my orgs, I'd chat with the employee and find a | solution" Its a law firm, what is OP going to do abandon | tech and become a paralegal? | | Your arguments are all very much ignoring the point of | how every facet of this situation incentivizes OP not to | tell management and that the most likely outcome of | telling them is that they lose their job while the | company benefits from OP's work and slashes a 90k salary. | You are ignoring that OP as a rational actor can only | take 1 of 3 actions. 1. Create the script and don't tell | management. This is a win / win. Company gets its | documents processed on time and OP keeps his job. 2. | Don't create the script. Lose / Don't Win. Documents | continue to be processed behind schedule but OP keeps his | job but does hours of slow manual labor. 3. OP | voluntarily gives company his script. Win / Lose. Company | gets their documents processed on time, and saves 90k in | salary. OP loses his job. | | Option 1 is the only option where both parties win. | neom wrote: | I understand the situation. I take real issue with them | poster taking it upon themselves to make the decision | it's win win, you don't, that's fine. :) | | I don't not see your perspective, I do, I just don't | agree they can say it's win win given the facts. Had they | posted the whole thing and ended with "so I told the | company and they laughed and now I get paid to do | nothing, win win" I'd never have commented. I see why | they can say it's a win all around, I just don't agree it | truly is, in my opinion further negotiation should happen | to test it, however for the reasons discussed | exhaustively, that isn't advantageous so won't happen, so | I don't think we can truly say it's a win-win, they are | working on asymmetric information! :) | | re: give up and become a paralegal, no: there may very | well be other scripts to be written. | | I'm going for a bike ride now. | wonderwonder wrote: | Fair enough, I hope you have a good ride. Appreciated the | conversation. All the best. | arbitrage wrote: | Oh no, won't someone think of the businesses? | neom wrote: | Depends on if you care about other people I suppose. The West | subscribes to capitalism as the modality to move society | forward, so yes, till that changes, do think of the business | imo. | skinnymuch wrote: | You're conflating different things. The business doesn't | really care about the person. The west as a whole | subscribing to capitalism does not then lead to the things | you are saying "if you care about other people". There is | no logic there. | neom wrote: | There is a stock market, people invest in business. | People use those investments to put their kids through | schools. Profits are distributed to employees in coops, | those funds are used to buy things from other people, etc | etc etc etc etc, this moves society forward per the | capitalistic philosophy. One individual not being | forthcoming with the truth in a system like that, creates | inefficiencies in the system, and has ripple effects | across the whole system. Butterfly effect. | | Business is just an implementation of a philosophy, it | doesn't care about you, but the idea of business is to | care for all, that is the theory and why we use the | system. Sadly, it's gotten extremely fucked up over the | last 100 years, and we end up with people on reddit doing | stuff like this. Capitalism is broken, absolutely, but | the redditer is still being intellectually dishonest | about the win-win situation. | Sohcahtoa82 wrote: | > Depends on if you care about other people I suppose. | | Oh no! Will someone PLEASE think about the multi- | millionaire CEOs? | | > The West subscribes to capitalism as the modality to move | society forward | | People might claim this, but it's a bullshit bad-faith | claim. | | Capitalism exists for one sole purpose: Create profit. | Capitalists will happily destroy the planet if it makes | their ticker symbol go up. | antihero wrote: | The business _does not care about you_. _The business_ is | fundamentally a sociopathic entity. Only a fool would | _care_ about that, unless you have a personal connection to | the shareholders. | laputan_machine wrote: | Is that not a failure of whoever is tasked with finding | efficiencies? Seems like the employee should be given their job | :). | typon wrote: | And when a company makes surplus profit from its employees' | labour and doesn't compensate them for it accordingly, is that | also considered theft? | neom wrote: | No. That is in fact not how the law works at all. | wonderwonder wrote: | "By staying silent he is denying the business the ability | to optimize it's cogs, and therefore effectively stealing | for the business." | | That's not how the law works either. If employee A, B and C | all have different processes to do the same task and | employee A is faster than the other 2, employee A is not | stealing and neither are the other 2. | neom wrote: | I don't know what jurisdiction you're referring to, here | in Canada what he did would likely be illegal, and the | other instance would not. I don't know of a locality | where what typon said is illegal. It's not difficult to | get creative when pursuing theft of company time, and | here I doubt you'd even need to get that creative. I'm an | EIR at a law firm so I will ask and report back. | antihero wrote: | It's illegal to fulfil your job obligations creatively? | neom wrote: | It can be, yes. | willcipriano wrote: | What law are you referring to? | jxidjhdhdhdhfhf wrote: | Shouldn't whoever is tasked with finding such inefficiencies | realize that a simple script could be written to replace the | process of manually transferring files to and from cloud | storage? | neom wrote: | That is not how teams work. I recommend this book to learn | more on how teams work: https://www.amazon.com/Wisdom-Teams- | Creating-High-Performanc... | tamiral wrote: | I have this book and haven't read it yet... but will start | it! thanks for the reminder. | neom wrote: | Extremely boring, but I recommend persisting to the end. | jxidjhdhdhdhfhf wrote: | People are unable to realize a script can be written | because that's "not how teams work"? I'm very confused at | what you're trying to say. | neom wrote: | Imperfect analogies so please read between the lines....: | Take a finance team, you have a group of specialists who | don't really know what each other do, FP&A vs BM&A or | Investor relations. However, they don't need to know what | each other do because they can trust the person next to | them to say, hey.. payroll is now automated, I have extra | time now, what should I work on to improve things, is it | fair to take advantage of that in a team simply because | one person isn't an expert? If you know someones job is | to do something, say.. buy servers, but you know they | don't know anything about servers, only how to finance | them, should you exploit that for your self gain? If | there is a person who's job it is to optimize, but the | system is obfuscated, is that fair to the team? OP said | it's win win, that is intellectually dishonest, it is not | win win. that's my real point. | [deleted] | i_haz_rabies wrote: | https://marshallbrain.com/manna1 - read this and then see if | you still care at all about business efficiency | antihero wrote: | And what exactly does he owe them? The company exists to enrich | the owners by extracting wealth from his work. | dkarl wrote: | I feel like this is something that has been a common occurrence | since personal computers started entering the workplace, but | people who accomplish it usually follow up by expanding the scope | of their job. Personally, I know someone who has "automated her | work" using Excel at several jobs, to the point that she spent a | few days per month doing the entire job of the person she | replaced. These were jobs that anyone could have automated any | time in the previous 10-15 years, and were automated at other | companies she worked at, but at several companies she was the | first to do it. | | In software development, I "automated my job" many times in the | old days in the sense that I was given a task that I was expected | to do in a brute-force manner over several weeks, but I solved it | by spending a few days cleaning and structuring the data and then | writing a script. Now people are less and less surprised by the | ability to solve problems with programming, so instead of handing | out tasks like that, they are more likely to ask a product | manager to design a new capability for internal tooling. | | I haven't personally encountered somebody who used automation to | coast in a job. The intersection between people who can achieve | this technically and the people who can achieve it socially is | probably pretty small. (If I automated my job, I would have a | hard time keeping my mouth shut about it. My Excel friend is a | squeaky-clean go-getter and would not be able to resist taking on | extra work.) I understand the choice, though. | sebringj wrote: | If this is true or not, I had a situation in my past where I was | developing an ecommerce API as a business that had both web and | backend. Basically, it made integrations take a day instead of | 3-4 months. I hired some offshore developers to use my API to | setup for new clients, effectively making a killing as I could | still charge quite a lot for this specific integration and yet | undercut all the competition. Long story short, my API code was | stolen from under me by the offshore people I hired and I | subsequently was made obsolete in my business model. I did not | know how to prove this or go forward with litigation. Anyways, | that's in my past but kind of a reverse way of screwing yourself. | verall wrote: | I'm sorry that happened as I'm sure the API took a solid amount | of work, but you've got to admit that's hilarious. | sebringj wrote: | The full story is actually a lot worse but yah it is pretty | dumb. | mkl95 wrote: | For 5 months, I had a gig that involved upgrading a large CRM | app. After a few weeks of yak shaving and planning, I had | automated most of my tasks. It was a 6 month contract, but by the | 3rd month it was basically finished. A few weeks after that, I | was bored out of my mind. One day my manager called me out about | "not working enough hours". 2 weeks later I was making more money | at a more stable job. | genmud wrote: | Story time: | | I once had a coworker who told me the story of someone who fell | through the cracks and quite literally get lost in the | bureaucracy of a fortune 50 company. | | To set the stage, my coworker was an investigator who primarily | focused on physical security, legal and HR investigations. We | worked at a very large company (around 140,000 employees) and | during the 90s/early 2000s one of the primary ways they grew was | through mergers and acquisitions. | | Well, during this time period the company went through an | acquisition spree, purchasing hundreds, maybe even thousands of | smaller companies in very high margin, specialty products. They | would then optimize their costs (read: layoff a good portion of | their workforce like R&D, HR, finance, IT) and basically let the | product run the course and then sell it off for about 60-80% of | what it paid for it once it no longer was profitable. | | As you can imagine this could make things a bit chaotic at times, | where people were coming and going all the time, with constant | org-changes and layoffs happening all the time. | | Meet Tom. Tom was came to work at this company in the late 80s | after his small company was acquired by the large company. Tom | had been working at the company ever since and when he hit his 20 | years at the company, he opted to retire with a full pension. He | did what every good employee does, notified his manager and let | him know that at the end of the month he would be retiring. | | The Executive VP whom Tom reported to, who had just started about | 6 months earlier asked his admin "who the fuck is this guy, I | don't know any Tom that works for me". The admin replied, | actually he does report to you and he has been here for a very | long time. The EVP was confused and asked what he did, which | nobody could really answer. So he reached out to HR and was like | "hey, I have no idea who this is or what they do, can you look | into this?". | | Tom had a very inflated title when his old company had gotten | acquired. Something to the effect of "Senior VP, Engineering" but | his role was effectively customer support, providing customer | support for some legacy industrial systems that the company had | manufactured and deployed in the 70s/80s. Right after the | acquisition his immediate boss (the acquired companies old CEO) | quit, which kicked off a bit of a perfect storm. After his boss | left Tom was told that he would report to one of the executives, | lets call him John, of the large company, while they figured | things out and that he should coordinate with some of the other | customer support people to align the way the work with their | customers. | | A few weeks later, John was then promoted to run one of the other | divisions of the company as part of the yearly promotion/review | cycle. Before John had moved on though, he had written the | performance review for Tom which consisted of your doing a great | job, keep working with the support team and going forward, they | will have a better feel for your performance and manage your | workload. When Tom tried to meet with his new boss, the new boss | cancelled several meetings and then said "Just keep doing what | your doing, only let me know if we have issues". | | As the company bought and sold companies like playing cards, a | culture of keeping your head low while looking busy took hold of | the company and nobody wanted to be the sqeaky wheel about | _anything_. Tom had a set of tasks and reports that he was | responsible for and he worked diligently on those tasks. Since | there weren 't any issues that he couldn't take care of, he never | needed to meet with his direct manager. Other people in the | company saw his title and who he reported to and generally | thought he was some sort of bigwig and avoided talking to him for | fear of getting on an executives radar. Each year, his boss would | rate him as meets expectations and his admin assistant would ask | the customer support people how he was doing, which would always | respond with "no issues". | | However, about 2-3 years after Toms old company was bought, they | stopped selling the product and put the things Tom supported went | into a maintenance only status. Weeks, months, years and then | decades went by and every week Tom would sit in his office, | waiting for support phone calls and deliver his report on Friday. | | From the investigation, they had found that over the last 10 | years that Tom was employed at the company there were only 2 | customers who paid for support. 2 years before Tom retired, one | of the customers didn't renew support and when they reached out | to the other customer they responded "we have no idea what this | is for, we just pay the invoices when we get them". | | They estimated over the last 10-15 years at the company, that Tom | worked approximately 20-30 minutes/week but had otherwise | followed all company policies and procedures. | marktangotango wrote: | Although these reads more than a bit contrived, I actually | believe the gist of it. I once worked in such a "acquired for | the product that won't be invested in and let die" | companies/subsidiary and something like this did happen for the | entire org. I joined after it'd been going on for about 20 | years and they had a hiring spurt because someone got the idea | to "modernize". The modernization effort ended when that exec | left, and the company and it's products languished for several | more years. Eventually the acquiring company was acquired and | the new owner was super focused on margins and cut a lot of | people. So yeah, it does happen. | mihcsab wrote: | tbh, something similar happened to me too. I took over a sysadmin | job, multiple servers. They had a lot of problems in the backend, | because of bad configs, sometimes they spent days resolving the | same issues on multiple servers, without trying to fix the root | causes. I just took the time and went through the configs and | corrected them. Also made some simple scripts that do the same | thing that they did manually. No one knows how much is changed in | the background, so they don't bother me with how much I actually | work with the administration, they just know they used to spend | hours with problems before, now nothing really comes up, maybe | one problem every two months. Now my job with them is just | generating monthly health reports, spending five minutes looking | through the logs, making the invoices and being available when | something doesn't work. | | So yeah I can believe the poster. Some firms never thought about | automatization, maybe they don't even know how much is possible, | so they are happy to pay the same amount if everything just | works, without bothering you about actual time spent with it. | Maybe it even works better, than it used to when the other dude | did it manually as a full time job. | thrownaway564 wrote: | Easier way - attend all the "allyship" and DEI meetings instead | of doing your job. If confronted say "challenging white supremacy | is everyones job!" and insist they should "do the work" | | Join Zoom. Use a heart or snaps emoji in the first five minutes. | Turn off camera. Leetcode. | null_object wrote: | I think most of us are feeling some schadenfreude because the | poster is ripping-off a law-firm - but the disappointment for me | is that (for the most part) (s)he seems to be treating it as an | 8-hour day where (s)he simply skips work - which I would | definitely find totally soul-destroying. | | I saw in the follow-up comments that there are is some "passion | project" that's being worked on, but apparently it wasn't | 'relevant' enough to mention it in the original post, and came | under the miscellaneous "computer games _or do whatever_ " | darkwizard42 wrote: | Which is why, like most things posted on that subreddit (and | online communities in general) should be approached with a | bunch of skepticism. | | The post reeks of "yeah, that happened" vibes. | theturtletalks wrote: | I really do think it happened. Just look at the explosion of | no-code tools that handle this sort of tedious work for small | businesses. The caveat is that once the owner figures out | they can automate this person's work, that person will be out | of a job. | wobblybubble wrote: | Why does there need to be passion project? He could study | philosophy or do whatever that one can do in an office by | oneself. | lemmiwinks wrote: | Why woudn't studying philosophy _not_ a passion project? | wobblybubble wrote: | It could be. | | But this is Hacker News so it often means something hacker- | related. | dymk wrote: | Random philosophy stuff is like the #2 most common type | of article submitted here | wobblybubble wrote: | Is it the #2 most common passion project here though. | froaway4job wrote: | Wow. I need to step my game up... | | I've been working 4 jobs SWE roles remotely (3 full time, 1 part | time) for several years now. I have to admit that the most | challenging aspect of working multiple jobs is finding the right | balance of working hard enough at each job just to get by. | Automating a lot of the busy work sounds challenging for more | hands on technical roles. I may need to take some pay cuts to | find easier roles that I can automate. | | If anyone has any tips on how to automate parts of their | engineering work I'm all ears! | throwaway1492 wrote: | I've done this as well, multiple swe jobs, I also did not find | ways to automate. Just trying to get a little something done | every day to report in the stand ups is what I did. Most teams | are so low performing it was easy. Every so often a new manager | would come along and make my life hell then I'd have to move | on. | allenu wrote: | At some point in my 20-year career, I've realized there isn't a | tight coupling of the work you do when it comes to effort, time, | and overall impact and the pay that you receive. | | I've been on both ends where I worked extra hard and didn't get | anything out of it, and I've done barely anything and got paid | and management was happy. There's a kind of cognitive dissonance | you encounter if you have this notion of "fairness" when it comes | to work done and reward earned. It feels like you're cheating | someone if you don't do enough work, but then you can do a whole | bunch of work and it becomes meaningless if someone up in the | management chain decides on a whim that your project isn't | essential. | | This story does sound truthful to me because there are so many | things we pay for because we don't know what goes into it and | we're happy to be ignorant of what goes into it, so long as it | gets done. You're paying for the security of knowing the job will | be done. As others have said in the posts here, I also would feel | unfulfilled doing something like this because there's still an | inherent need many of us have to do something productive | regularly. | nemothekid wrote: | You aren't being paid to copy and paste files, you are paid so | the company can retain your skills in the event anything goes | wrong. | | If the evidence was gone, corrupted or needed to be changed , | they have someone on staff who can quickly remedy that. Isn't | that the point of a high skill job? You get paid for knowing | which screw to tighten, you don't get paid for tightening screws. | rcthompson wrote: | I think it's actually a bit more subtle than that. The post | says the law firm "wanted [them] to be the only person with | admin access to the Cloud, everyone else would be limited to | view only". I wonder if their job is, more than anything else, | to be the person who is legally on the hook if anything goes | wrong, because they're the only one with write access. | raisedbyninjas wrote: | Assuming the story is true, they're preying on ignorance. | You're describing normal employment and service contracting. | The law firm has a huge misconception about the complexity of | the task and the human labor required for normal and | exceptional operations. Even the spreadsheet sanity checking | could probably be automated. This is a few thousand dollars of | consultant time to setup, and maybe a few thousand/year to | maintain. | Shamii wrote: | Sounds very very boring to me. | | I have no clue who would pay someone 90$ for copy and pasting | files from left to right. | | But if this is true I still don't envy him. | | When his gig is up he has nothing to show and is stuck were he | was when taking that job. | | Also can't imagine doing nothing and feeling not being needed or | not making a real difference. | zero102 wrote: | I was for a few years in college a data entry clerk making | $12.50/hr. It was effectively copy/pasting with some extra | clicks and being a computer science student at the time I wrote | an excel connector that did ~80% of my job. It only required me | to intervene on especially hard data entry stuff (lots of math | or formulas). There really was no benefit to tell anyone I did | this. Not because I _wanted_ to be lazy but it would just mean | more data entry and not what I wanted to do (automating other | people 's stuff). | | There's loads of these BS jobs out there especially when numpty | salesmen are involved. It was relatively soul crushing because | it didn't really afford me any extra time to do school work | (cube farm yay) but I was able to basically zone out and make | money, or stash some homework problems and work them while | appearing to stare intently at the screen. I don't harbor any | ill will towards them though unlike most of these /r/antiwork | losers. They were friendly to me and it was just the culture | there that "if it isn't done manually then we dont need a | person to do it". | | I ended up getting a couple raises and only left when I got my | first real SWE job. I got in touch with them recently and there | are still some scripts running some important IT processes I | wrote many, many years ago running today. | lizknope wrote: | I worked at a small insurance consulting firm in 1994. Before | I got there someone did data entry into a spreadsheet but | then sorted all the rows manually by inserting and copying | and pasting. I read the Lotus 123 manual and showed them how | to sort with different priorities. Their mind was blown. They | had been spending hours sorting rows and the computer could | do it in a minute (it was a slow machine) | | Then they would take the spreadsheet data and dial in to a | mainframe and type everything in again. This was a system at | a different company. They wanted the spreadsheet version for | their own local records. I found that the mainframe had a | "file upload" feature and I figured out the format. | | I installed Linux on another machine, added in some old ISA | ethernet cards and had a network. I saved all files as Lotus | 123 and .csv and wrote some Linux scripts to convert the data | to the format the mainframe needed. | | I also wrote some wrappers around "grep" to find anyone's | info in the daily Lotus 123 update files. | | All of this should have been done in a database but I had | just finished my freshman year and didn't know anything about | databases and the owner obviously didn't know much about | computers in the first place. | | Anyway I got a $500 bonus at the end of the summer and a | glowing recommendation when I applied to some real software | companies the next summer. | [deleted] | 35fbe7d3d5b9 wrote: | > When his gig is up he has nothing to show and is stuck were | he was when taking that job. | | The right answer is "start finding a second job, now." Make | $180k for 8 hours and 10 minutes of your life! Or | alternatively, keep on keeping on and market yourself as a | legal document management automation specialist when you | bounce. | | > Also can't imagine doing nothing and feeling not being needed | or not making a real difference. | | I have a wife and kids to help me feel needed, and a garden | that needs tending when I want to feel myself making a | difference. Work is work. 90% of jobs are filled to the gills | with bureaucracy and designed to ensure the average employee | does very little and accomplishes nothing. Might as well enjoy | it when they make it easy to enjoy. | tpoacher wrote: | Hahah, I love that top comment though: | | > Think of your wages as a subscription service to your | automation program lol. Big companies love subscription services, | right? | | spot on, hahah | brodouevencode wrote: | Great engineers try to automate their way out of a job. It would | seem like their employer would reward them for using a little | ingenuity. Why wouldn't he just come clean about it? | antihero wrote: | What exactly do they have to gain from that? | MSFT_Edging wrote: | If his employer learned they didn't need to pay him for 40 | hours a week, why would they maintain his employment? | giantg2 wrote: | Why would he be rewarded? They would likely try to save that | $90k by replacing him, or give him a lot more work with very | little increase in comp. | | If there's anything I've learned in 10 years, you keep your | mouth shut when things are easy because if you speak up they | screw you with more work and the same (or nearly so) pay. | brodouevencode wrote: | This is a very cynical way of looking at things. And maybe | rightly so given your experience. Every job I've ever had | though there's never been a shortage of work - the few | examples that I can recall of whenever one of my engineers | frees up a significant amount of time I gave them harder | things to do and a recommended a raise (Im a lead not a | people manager) to go along with it. | hogrider wrote: | It's just game theory. No one would vote for more work for | themselves and no extra pay unless you were weirdly | indoctrinated by your employer. | giantg2 wrote: | My company will give you more work. Just no raise or | promotion to go with it. I honestly don't see most | companies giving raises with additional work. | noasaservice wrote: | Using "cynical" in looking at the job market when compared | to potential abuses is a very boomerish thing. | | Us millenials and zoomers see how this society is played | out. You work hard for a company - you get more work for | same pay. | | They demand 2 weeks notice but have no issue in hauling | your ass out with no severance on a term. | | Managers promise increases and you get 2% , or 1/3 of | inflation. | | Companies' recruiters target their own employees for their | own jobs at $20k more than they're making. And new people | (without experience) get more than the experienced ones. | | Health insurance costs more and more each year, all the | while covering less and less. | | And the harassment. Damn, the harassment. | | And you, individually, cannot do much of anything regarding | the company when negotiating grievances. Unions can, but | tech people have this poisonous mindset that they can | somehow do better than a union. | | So yes, I am /r/antiwork . I've lived through enough of | stupid shit. And we're done with it. | giantg2 wrote: | I'm not anti-work. I'm just anti-work for exploitive | jerks. I have no problem working hard for myself | (projects, chores, improvements, etc). | | I think we both just realize that the rewards are simply | not commensurate with effort in most cases. Executive and | management pay goes up, yet they are just overhead, not | production. So essentially they have to take advantage of | the value produced by their worker for themselves. We | recognize this and are unmotivated. | delecti wrote: | Because he doesn't care about the job being done, but only | about getting paid for the results. It's like admitting someone | already owns a goose that lays golden eggs when you can instead | sell them the eggs. | wonderwonder wrote: | Why, its a law firm, not a tech company, there are no other | jobs for him to do. By giving them the script he would | literally "automate himself out of a job". What would be the | incentive to keep him? | 99_00 wrote: | A small lawfirm that doesn't have its own IT department doesn't | have engineering opportunities | brodouevencode wrote: | That's fair, but his boss would almost gladly ask him what | else could be automated. It would be a winning prop for both. | jpindar wrote: | He wouldn't get any imaginary internet points for _that_. | manishsharan wrote: | I work in enterprise architecture and the most annoying part of | my job is telling dev teams to comply with policies and best | practices, which are fully documented and yet ignored. I would | love to have AI solution that could review a uml or a design | document or a terraform script and write out responses. | uberdru wrote: | Look at it this way. The script that you wrote is worth $90K/year | to this firm. | binarytox1n wrote: | Many subreddits are simply themed containers of creative writing. | With all the media attention the AntiWork subreddit has gotten | lately that brings more karma farmers and therefore more fiction. | It's an entertaining read, but not likely true. | jbigelow76 wrote: | _Many subreddits are simply themed containers of creative | writing._ | | One really annoying trend I am seeing in some mainstream news | publishing online is repackaging social media clips and | "reporting" on them as if NewsWeek breaking a story, Reddit and | TikTok seem to be the current darlings of this form of phone it | in journalism. | BeFlatXIII wrote: | It makes it easy to play games with journalistic integrity if | you have a beef with a local paper and want them to get egg | on their face. Then again, this is not unique to the internet | --only easier. It was a major plot point in the final season | of The Wire. | Kluny wrote: | Yeah, it's trash and you're almost always better off just | reading the original story (if you haven't already, since it | was probably on the front page of a major subreddit). | Aissen wrote: | Even if that were true, no harm done... | | But imagine for a minute it isn't. What's the point of farming | karma on a throwaway account ? Plus, we are social creatures, | and sometimes we just need to offload our personal stories. | Quite often there's a new fun thing that I wish I could write | about or tell the world, but I don't because of real | consequences to some people, or even myself. Recounting these | stories is cathartic. And to go back to the original point, | they are also weirdly cathartic even if fabricated. | dave5104 wrote: | > What's the point of farming karma on a throwaway account ? | | reddit accounts are built up and then sold[0][1], and then | used for who knows what. Helps to have an "established" | account with high karma and a post history. | | In more popular subreddits (like /r/funny), you'll see | frequent re-postings of content from 5+ years ago just for | the "karma whoring" as it's called. | | [0] https://www.soar.sh/service/buy-reddit-accounts/ [1] | https://quantummarketer.com/buy-reddit-accounts/ | vlunkr wrote: | The harm done is that impressionable young people on | /r/antiwork are given false hope in their dream of getting | paid to do nothing so they can play more video games. | hyprmynd wrote: | What a terrible dream, especially since most games are just | jobs now. | pixl97 wrote: | Ah, hackernews, the anti-antiwork. There are many things I | come to HN for, but looking for a healthy work culture is | not one of them. | dfxm12 wrote: | There's a kernel of truth in all good fiction. Whether this is | 100% true, or just exaggerated, it's still worth knowing & | evangelizing that there are a lot of tools out there that can | automate a lot of your job. Between shell scripting and LCAP | tools, a ton of what a lot of people do, not just IT | professionals, can be automated. | | I know a bunch of people who could be in a similar situation as | the OP if they just took a couple days to learn how to use | power apps, power automate and _gasp_ powershell. | robotnikman wrote: | I try automating as much as I can at my current job. Probably | out of laziness, but also because it leads to less room for | error, and I feel much more mentally stimulating when trying | to figure out how to automate something | nlh wrote: | Funny, I had this exact same thought. The red flags for me were | their use of "clock in" and "shift". Those are not concepts | generally in play for IT staff at law firms. | michaelbuckbee wrote: | That actually rang fairly true to me as some of the law | offices I interacted with (consultant) did so as they did | some sort of fractional billing to the clients for internal | IT time. | | I actually wonder if that's not the bigger scam here, that | the firm is re-billing this person's make-work job in some | sort of time and materials way that there is financial | incentive to keep him doing this unnecessary role. | rhino369 wrote: | If the firm was billing his time, he'd have to create a | billing log. You generally can't get away with billing for | IT. But you can bill for "litigation support" which is the | intersection of IT and litigation. Though its much more | involved than just uploading files to an FTP. | Melatonic wrote: | Depends how shady the firm is :-) | | Also for probably any litigation that is IT related you | could probably get away with a lot more | rhino369 wrote: | Firms navigate this by making the employees fill out | their own billing entries. If OP is filling out | fraudulent billing entries then that would explain why | nobody is checking up on him. If he's billed out, his | real work output is billed-hours. | OJFord wrote: | No reason (to need, in this situation) for the automated | program to run faster than a human. The right hours | billed to a human instead of the human's computer is.. | not quite so fraudulent? | decebalus1 wrote: | I disagree. Yes, 'clocking in' is not a frequent process for | IT people but it heavily depends on the company. My first job | was for a company that billed its clients based on hours. | Even if it was pretty much ridiculous for us (IT crowd) to do | so, we did clock in just like everyone else, so that our | billing department had a more 'accurate' representation of | how much we worked for that client, even if our work was | pretty much shared across all clients. | | I'm skeptical of these anonymous texts as well, but 'clocking | in' is not a red flag. Also, in my current role I still do | 'shifts' when I'm on-call, although I don't 'clock in' | anymore. | fesoliveira wrote: | FWIW he mentions that there is no IT department in the firm, | and that he works under administration. | rhino369 wrote: | This is the actual red flag. A mid-size firm simply | couldn't function without IT. They could outsource it to a | contractor, but, in that case, they'd never then hire | someone for 90k to do one small IT task. | | If there is any true to this, he's probably on the books as | an "Litigation Support Tech" and his job probably involves | (or is supposed to involve) more than he's describing--like | interfacing with vendors who do the actual data/document | processing. | withinboredom wrote: | You'd be surprised. I interviewed at a multi-million | dollar firm and there were two IT people there for the | whole firm. | rhino369 wrote: | Two is infinitely more than zero. | withinboredom wrote: | My point was that they may not even be big enough for | one. "Plug and play" might be good enough for now (a | shared drive means someone is around though, someone had | to set it up). | rhino369 wrote: | There are definitely small firms that rely on the young | paralegal who is a self taught super user. But that sort | of firm wouldn't pay someone 90k for doing a small part | of all IT. | | Slight chance this person was hired as a "case assistant" | or "litigation support" and not IT. Firms definitely hire | that sort of person--though they usually bill their time | --so hopefully the OP isn't submitting fraudulent time | entries. But 90k is a lot for that sort of role without | expectation that you are performing other tasks. | withinboredom wrote: | I'm still skeptical. I was hired at ridiculous rates once | ($2k an hour) to validate DKIM signatures by a small time | firm. 90k to be "on call" and validate things seems | totally reasonable even from a small firm. | rhino369 wrote: | Courts don't actually require you to check hashes like | the OP claims. They do remarkably little evidence | authentication unless the opposing party contests the | evidence. Digital evidence is by default produced to the | other side by low quality TIFF files. | | If you want to accuse the other side of manipulation, you | bring in an expert (who probably bills at nearly 1000 | bucks an hour). | | I didn't take this as a sign of OP being false because | its likely he just doesn't understand why the firm wants | to him to validate hashes. The likely reason is other | employees fucked up transfers. | withinboredom wrote: | Nailed why I was hired. :) | DennisP wrote: | And he's working from home, so "clock in" basically means | logging in. | hungryforcodes wrote: | I've never seen an IT company in North America use that. | wccrawford wrote: | I had a job that tried to implement a time logging system. | Most of IT just _didn 't_. Eventually they explained to us | that the payroll guy uses that to cut the checks, and it's a | _huge_ pain in their ass if we don 't use the system. They | compromised by asking us to log in and out _at least once | each pay period_. That was fine, and we did. | | But they really did try to get us to go whole hog on it at | first. | laurent123456 wrote: | $90K just to move some files from one folder to another seems | high too. Either the job involves more than what's he saying, | or it's simply fake. | vlunkr wrote: | Yeah this is the big red flag for me. I believe that a law | firm without a ton of technical knowledge would hire | someone to do this work manually, but they'd get an intern | or something, this is not skilled work. | robbedpeter wrote: | It's easy to overstate the technical difficulty of lots | of basic IT work, especially if people are tech | illiterate. | | There might be an element of deliberate fraud if this guy | is spelling out the difficulty of the job as justifying | his pay to management. I've seen very clever goldbricking | similar to this, where management doesn't know enough to | understand what good IT looks like, or how to value IT | work. | toyg wrote: | On the other side: the business can clearly afford it, so | the value he brings is entirely justified from a | commercial perspective. The fact that they can find | cheaper alternatives on the IT market is a different | issue. | | You can buy a new branded car for $$$ and be sure it will | work for years with minimal maintenance, or you can shop | around and buy a passable 15-year-old car; in both cases | it will likely get you from A to B for a while, but the | chance of having problems is lower with the new "whip". | This guy, to the business, is the equivalent of leasing a | new car every year: they can afford it and brings no risk | as far as they can see. | | The obsession with capital efficiency can often turn into | a disease. Why should we drive down our own wages, when | the market is willing to pay more? | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | This is basically why I do not automatically discount the | story as fake. I have certainly been a part of groups | that had a wide range of technical skills. It is an odd | experience, but it forces you to think about your | audience ( and document everything like you would for | your parent ). | | I do have an anecdote in a similar vein from a buddy, but | he does sometimes tend to exaggerate sometimes so I won't | mention it. I absolutely believe though there are | companies are still run in a very traditional way for one | reason or another. | downrightmike wrote: | how to value IT work-- yup | jimmaswell wrote: | I used to get 60k and have no work to do for months at a | time. "Forgotten employee" situations are certainly real. | arethuza wrote: | I knew a chap who left where I used to work to go to a | large UK bank at high end contracting rates. | | He returned after a few months saying that the team he | joined (which was apparently quite large) had been given | no work in that time and hadn't even been given any | computers - and they weren't allowed to use their own | devices for anything. He said he left simply because he | couldn't take the boredom - even though, as he freely | admitted, the money was fantastic. | analog31 wrote: | Going along with the original story, I could go either way | on this. On the one hand, paying someone $40k to do it, | probably involves more supervision and turnover, and a | chance of someone making a mistake. And then you get to | tell your million dollar client: "We lost our case because | our semi-skilled clerk misplaced a file and we have no IT | department." | | On the other hand, what would you pay an outside developer | to automate the process and guarantee accuracy, | maintenance, and uptime? Could you even do this with no | GUI, no dashboard, no management fanfare, and no | brainstorming of unnecessary features? | | $90k may be somewhere in between. | adrianN wrote: | I had a software engineering job where I clocked in and time | was tracked. Pretty good deal for people who tend to overwork | themselves. | hn_go_brrrrr wrote: | I did as well. My company ran a 36 hour hackathon. By law, | hours 8-12 were 1.5x time and hours 13+ were 2x time. It | was basically an extra paycheck. | gruez wrote: | Your company ran a paid hackathon? Were you able to do | whatever you want? Or was it a crunch to get a project | launched? | hn_go_brrrrr wrote: | Yep, paid hackathon, but participation was voluntary. | There were a few limitations: | | * It had to directly relate to the product. | | * You could not use the time to work on some existing | project. | | * You had to be able to finish it by the end of the | hackathon. | | Hackathon projects were sometimes adopted by a permanent | team, if there was a good fit. | bckr wrote: | How many incidents did those nice new features cause? | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | In Austria (and I think in Germany it's the same), for most | jobs, including IT, employees must track their working time | for legal reasons, so I had to clock in and out via a | device at the entrance like a factory worker, to prove to | HR, accounting and the bureaucratic government institutions | in charge of taxing me, that I'm indeed at my workplace | 8h/day. | | One company I interviewed at had a work-time time tracking | machine next to the coffee machine as breaks were not | included in the working time. I said no thanks to that job | but it's quite common in Austria at more traditional | companies who insist you're only productive while your butt | is in the chair. | | Thanks Covid for the disruption but it's a massive shame it | took a global tragedy for companies and governments to | realize people working in tech and other sectors can be | just as productive without needing to commute somewhere | else just so they can keep a seat warm for 8h/day. | bbarnett wrote: | _for companies and governments to realize people working | in tech and other sectors can be just as productive_ | | It may seem this way, but the conditions allowing this | situation still exist. | | I assure you, large swaths of people will be called back | to the office ASAP. | | And many non-IT/computing types need to be there, to be | productive. Which means many managers need to be too. | Which means, in non pure tech firms, the call will be | stronger, for lots of other employees will be in-office. | | Some say, that they'll just refuse. That's fine and dandy | now, but when the market crashes, 2 years, 5 years, and | jobs become scare? | | You, and everyone else will work in office to put food on | the table. | | I don't think this will stick. | Xylakant wrote: | > and I think in Germany it's the same | | It should be, but it's not in most circumstances. | (Industry is fighting it tooth and nail, all of a sudden | unpaid overtime would be so much harder.) | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> all of a sudden unpaid overtime would be so much | harder_ | | Austria "solved" this "problem" by introducing the | infamous all-in contract, adopted by many companies, | where all your potential overtime is already included in | your compensation. | | Basically it's a fancy way to have you wave your right to | paid overtime to what amounts to one of the most | exploitative legal employment practices I've seen in | Europe. | | And the strict time tracking is still there for legal and | workplace accident insurance reasons ("you claim you hurt | yourself through a work related accident at 14:40, but we | need to check your time tracking as proof you were | actually at work and not somewhere else") | Xylakant wrote: | > Austria "solved" this "problem" by introducing the | infamous all-in contract, adopted by many companies, | where all your potential overtime is already included in | your compensation. | | That's illegal in Germany, luckily. Some unpaid overtime | can be included in the contract, but a contract must | specify the maximum number of hours. | phillc73 wrote: | I can confirm this is the case in Austria. However, my | experience is mostly using a computerised system via the | company Intranet. There's an option to use an access card | and touch it to a login pad at the office entrance, but I | can also work from home, logging the time via the | Intranet based system. I don't get paid overtime, but I | do receive time off in lieu of excess hours worked. | cptskippy wrote: | This is how a lot of small businesses operate, and Law Firms | are small in terms of staff. Everyone tracks their hours, | even if their hours aren't billable. | | The same thing happens at engineering firms small or large. | Everyone tracks their hours the same way. | | Heck, I'm a salaried IT staff at an enterprise level nfp and | have to track my hours in two different systems. One of those | systems is the same one used by hourly staff and has the | concept of clocking in/out. | echelon wrote: | > Many subreddits are simply themed containers of creative | writing. | | I didn't take this at your original meaning, because my mind | fixated on this sentence. | | Social media and our surroundings create an environment for | either production or consumption. They can't be totally geared | towards consumption, or they run out of fuel. | | Communities like ArtStation, DeviantArt, etc. are incredibly | focused on the creative aspect. Wikipedia, Hacker News, | /r/slatestarcodex, and a bunch of other forums tend to foster | inspired writing. Open source, Github... | | I want to build more communities like these that focus on high- | effort, high-impact creation and learning. It would be really | great if it were cross-discipline. I imagine game or world- | building communities where people from different backgrounds | can contribute to constructing elaborate narratives. | | We need more of these and fewer dopamine-optimized | clickstreams. | MattGaiser wrote: | A friend of mine was an HR reporting analyst who can also code. | He automated his internship and we spent days gaming (I worked | for a startup that had a lot of meetings with limited real | work). | jerf wrote: | Like TheDailyWTF stories, this is in the category of stories | where even if the literal person who wrote that wrote fiction, | something that is effectively the same story is true for | someone. | | As developers who start writing big servers learn, scale | matters. Crap you'd never think twice about when running a | script on your workstation will bring your entire service down. | There's 7-ish billion people in the world. Entire industries | live in situations you've never experienced. There's plenty of | scale that all sorts of weird things really do happen to | someone, somewhere in real life. | | I don't find this all that hard to believe. To be honest, I'm | not even sure what you're finding hard to believe. What exactly | is it? That a law firm could be that clueless about tech? That | someone would discover this opportunity and simply milk it for | all its worth? I don't find any aspect of this story | particularly hard to believe. I'm sure this story is happening | at least a thousand times over somewhere in the world in some | form. | | In fact I'd bet that if we could investigate carefully enough, | we'd find someone out there who has at least three of these | jobs with different companies. Someone who blundered into one | of these, figured out some useful pattern, and figured out how | to do it systematically. Probably as a contractor. | xtracto wrote: | > As developers who start writing big servers learn, scale | matters. Crap you'd never think twice about when running a | script on your workstation will bring your entire service | down. | | This reminded me of an issue we had at a previous startup | that was growing really fast. There was a process that | "created PDF invoices", which was coded by calling a (sync) | API, which generated it on the fly. | | The problem changed, once those PDF invoices became 100MB | large, with hundreds of pages (required by business case). | It's a completely different beast that the "MVP" developers | did not thought about (as it is expected). Now you either | code and maintain an async service which uploads to S3, along | with the full lifecycle, or just buy a service to do it for | you. | | Scale definitely matters, and all systems change once you | consider large scale data and workloads. | dnautics wrote: | wait did you use to work where I work? We fixed this, haha. | jodrellblank wrote: | This exchange has been the long drawn out version of: | | > > Story | | > r/thathappened | | r/nothingeverhappens | | --- | | Where subreddit "ThatHappened" is a sarcastic one, a response | to far-fetched and unlikely sounding stories, implying they | are not true. Such response has been overdone enough that | subreddit "NothingEverHappens" has become a reply implying | that unlikely sounding things actually do happen. | | And all of it is a real-world version of the joke "a person | walks into a bar, and hears one of the regulars say 'number | 38' and the other regulars laugh. A bit later another one | says 'number 17' and they laugh. The person asks a regular | what's going on, and they say 'we have all been here so long | and told the same jokes so often that we know all the same | jokes and just refer to them by numbers. Try one yourself'. | The person says 'number 22'. Nobody laughs. The regular | shrugs, eh, it's the way you tell 'em". | | But suggesting that joke plays out in real life might be | r/thathappens . But it does happen, and people do laugh. | bargle0 wrote: | "Number 22!" | | "We don't say that one anymore. You're going to have to | leave." | lolc wrote: | "Number 73!" | | All regulars are laughing, hard. They shout out in turns | "73!", and laugh again. Confused, the person asks what's | so good about 73. Says a regular, catching his breath and | wiping tears from his eyes: "Heh 73, we haven't heard | that one before!" | buran77 wrote: | The story is most likely made up and one of the last | clarifications strongly hints at it: | | > It can't be this simple / this is fake because you aren't | doing blah blah. You're right, it's not this simple. There | are more steps involved in the script and it performs | functions I haven't discussed. [...] The core of the | script, transfer and hash, is accurate | | The person focuses on transfer and hash and keeps what | looks like an absolutely critical part of the process as | barely a mention: checking against a spreadsheet where the | automation is most vulnerable. Tens of thousands of files | means just as many opportunities for a typo in that | spreadsheet. And yet the job is still 10 minutes per day. | | Also with the popularity this gained, not being worried _at | all_ that the employers can guess who this is about just | because they left out some parts of the job is a bit | hilarious. Somehow I can buy that a mid-sized law firm | never realized how easy it is to automate this task. But | nobody ever suspecting they 're the actors in the story | despite the process being fairly unique? That I don't buy. | | Everything sounds like a very inexperienced person telling | a story they can only fantasize about. | getoj wrote: | > But nobody ever suspecting they're the actors in the | story despite the process being fairly unique? | | In a past life I used to write for a local TV soap. I | would constantly take personal events that my friends and | family told me about, minimally jazz them up, and have | them happen to our regular cast. I was there for five | years and not one person noticed that their story was on | the show. It's all about context. | [deleted] | jokethrowaway wrote: | I know sysadmins that did very similar things to what the | author is doing and spent their time in the office playing | videogames. | | It's not that unreal. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | I also agree that it's not only happened, but it's probably | not that rare. Before most businesses were automated to the | point where this is possible, I had an engineering job where | for at least two years, I may as well have not shown up. I | spent all my time reading magazines and doing pet projects | because there wasn't anything else for me to do but answer | the phone if a customer had a question. I could have easily | taken on another job in the mean time if remote work was a | thing back then. | | I knew at the time that I wasn't alone in this. I knew | another engineer whose job consisted of basically showing up | to work just in case an alarm went off. He spent his time | writing a software package that he sold. Because, again, he | really had nothing else to do all day, every day. | | This was back in the mid-late 90's. I'd expect that it's even | more prevalent now. | kodah wrote: | Eh, if the user is in the Midwest or South, I'd believe this | story. I wouldn't believe it on the coasts though. One of my | first jobs out of the military was being a sysadmin for a | national company with next to zero IT infrastructure. I was | interested in scaling their storage infrastructure due to some | commitments I found in their contracts, but they had no | cognizance of their systems capabilities. I was also NAASCO | certified and qualified to work on their robots and trucks so | my job was fairly expansive but I have no doubt they'd let | something like this happen in a well-defined position. | bluedays wrote: | this tbh. As someone who lived in Missouri for a couple years | it was astounding how many things weren't automated. | VBprogrammer wrote: | I have a similar story-ish but without the cloak and dagger | part. | | I was employed as a temp working for a large custodial bank. On | of the functions there was to confirm that the holdings we | thought we had in various assets matched the holdings that | issuer thought we had. They had a system which would | automatically accept various spreadsheet from issuers and would | flag up the discrepancies. | | Our job was to identify why we had discrepancies. By far the | most common discrepancy was trades which occured over the | report period. I wrote an VBA macro in Excel which scraped the | IBM 390 terminal emulator and would identify these and | automatically and close the discrepancy in the system | referencing the transaction IDs. Often it would automatically | close more than half of the discrepancies with no manual | intervention. Literally days of work each month. | | I could easily see someone more ballsy coming up with something | like than and keeping it to themselves. Add socially normalised | work from home and it would be trivial to do nothing for | several days which still appearing to be working faster than | most people on the team. | robinduckett wrote: | The key hint for me was "the type of script people put on | GitHub with a $5 price tag" :) | withinboredom wrote: | Have you never seen a readme with a donate button? | futharkshill wrote: | On a gist? | samatman wrote: | It's funny you'd say this because this is a classic tale in the | BOFH genre. | | Scripting your way out of stuff to do is a time-honored IP | pastime. The old tradition was to hit the boss key (F10 for you | youngins), now with remote there's no need. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > Many subreddits are simply themed containers of creative | writing. With all the media attention the AntiWork subreddit | has gotten lately that brings more karma farmers and therefore | more fiction. It's an entertaining read, but not likely true. | | Exactly. Don't underestimate the volume of fake stories posted | to Reddit. | | I tried giving advice in several computer career subreddits for | years. I was always stunned by the volume of obviously fake | stories people would post about their boss or company or | coworkers. Many of them are easy to debunk with even the | slightest attention to detail or a quick browse of the user's | posting history. | | I could barely believe how frequently I'd read a post with some | oddities, only to check the poster's history and see 5 | different creative writing style lies posted to other | subreddits with entirely different details. A lot of people | really like using Reddit to create fake outrage stories, | because it's a trivially easy way to collect a lot of upvotes | and internet sympathy points. | | Very strange phenomenon. | pavel_lishin wrote: | I also got r/thathappened vibes, but I choose to believe. | Anyone who's worked for more than a few places can name a | business that's held together with rubberbands and excel | spreadsheets, especially small businesses. This is an entirely | believable story. | TriNetra wrote: | Back in 2013, as part of my consultancy services, I built a | simple email support site for a client, whose most difficult | part was just a background job (mailman) that would need to | pull emails from different providers and send emails through | them, as per replied by this client's support reps. The | customer wanted a sort of custom service rather than using | Zendesk or something, because he was providing a "outsourced | support services" to his clients. I charged only $950 to build | the initial version, but charged monthly maintenance which | started from $300 something, and over the months/years went | onto $840+ monthly. Mostly, it was Mailman that would require | some tweaks re error handling/retry logic, as there were weird | errors I would see from different providers once in a while. | However, the code would work flawlessly and for months I didn't | even need to check it at all. | | So, yes it's possible IMO, just that you need to be in a right | situation at the right time with the mindset of a hacker (the | one who wants to make machine works for him), you can achieve | something like this. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > So, yes it's possible IMO, | | All of these highly-upvoted Reddit stories have the same few | things in common: | | 1) They're vague enough to be possible. If it's too | outlandish, people will call it out. | | 2) Verifiable or falsifiable specifics are conveniently | omitted. This is easy to justify due to the anonymity. | | 3) They have an element of good guy versus bad guy, where the | reader can empathize with the person telling the story but | can also accept the counterparty (the company, boss, | whatever) as the "bad guy" without feeling bad about it. | These subreddits are built on the premise that companies and | bosses are bad, so anything that fits that narrative is | welcomed without question. | | Basically, the stories are vague enough that they can't be | falsified, but there are so many of them with so many | convenient details falling perfectly in to place for the | poster that it's extremely unlikely that all, or even most, | of them are real stories. In the past, people would dig | through the Reddit poster's history and often find | conflicting posts (e.g. someone claiming to be a programmer | in one post, then claiming to be unemployed somewhere else), | but lately Reddit is such high-volume and fast-moving that | nobody really cares to check anything. If it sounds good, it | gets an upvote. | | Take it all with a grain of salt. It may sound plausible or | "truthy", but you never know which stories are real and which | are just someone's creative writing exercise. | tikhonj wrote: | I mean, if I were running a small business and needed to run | my own Mailman instance, I would pay those prices--or even | substantially more!--in a heartbeat. And I'm technical enough | that I _could_ manage Mailman myself. | | It sounds like you were clearly representing the service you | were providing, so it's a bit of a different story. | yung_steezy wrote: | I also think companies pay to have their totally-not- | astroturfed subreddit featured on the frontpage such as | /r/tinder | cgriswald wrote: | It might be true, or not. | | I worked as an overnight computer operator years ago, and could | easily have replaced myself with a batch script, except for a | couple manual tasks that I could have done either at the | beginning or end of my shift. I didn't do that, because I | enjoyed going to work and being able to work on my hobbies | while being paid. The company didn't do it largely out of | ineptitude. They'd say they wanted a warm body there in case | something went wrong, but one of us was always on-call anyway, | even with another of us actually there; no reason the system | couldn't just alert the on-call person. | | One of our overnight operators worked a second job during his | shift. He'd fire up a batch of jobs, go work elsewhere, come | back on his lunch break and fire up another batch of jobs, go | finish his shift elsewhere, then come back and fire off the | last batch of jobs and be there when people started coming for | work in the morning. He got caught because he was the only one | of us who was always a little behind in his work; so they | watched the cameras. When confronted, he admitted it. If he'd | have automated the stuff, he'd have gotten away with it for a | lot longer. | supperburg wrote: | What is the point of karma farming? | decebalus1 wrote: | Accounts with high karma are sold for all sorts of purposes, | for marketing campaigns (reddit is a cesspool of | astroturfing) all the way to political campaigns. | | https://quantummarketer.com/buy-reddit-accounts/ | Gigachad wrote: | People will list out lots of practical reasons but I suspect | the main one is that the number on your profile going up | makes people feel good. As well as the temporary fame every | time they make a popular post. Same reason people post | dangerous stunts on tiktok despite gaining nothing monetary | from it. | loceng wrote: | Years ago I was hosting guests from Airbnb. Due to my location | I got a lot of English language students coming to Canada for | 2-3 long immersion courses. One guest shared with me that one | of their assignments was to engage with hosts, even if they | weren't planning to ever book; obviously these people | eventually did, but it's a bit problematic as it's time not | compensated for - sure, it's built into the cost of business | but without an agreement to accept such practice conversations | it's verging on dishonest. | letitbeirie wrote: | Send them an invoice. | | You'll never see a penny mind you, but IME (which includes | getting pimped out to help the admin office a decent bit in | grad school) mystery invoices have a pretty good chance of | getting "wtf is this"'d all the way up to the dean's office. | hogrider wrote: | Well, this being the post truth era an all I pretty much think | everything is sponsored content or trolls, someone doing some | free writing is pretty harmless. That said, lawyers are prettt | clueless as to what they would need of this kind of worker so I | can see it happening. | zffr wrote: | I personally know someone who claims to have automated his work | with Excel after learning how to code. He ended up telling his | manager after feeling guilty. He got a promotion and eventually | left the team to become a real software engineer. The rest of | his team was eventually let go since they were not needed. This | was at a large company you have definitely heard of. | | Its possible that my friend lied or exaggerated the situation, | and also possible that the author of the reddit post isn't | being completely honest. Personally, I'm inclined to believe | the stories are mostly true. | | Even at my BigTech job I have seen opportunities were non- | technical people were doing highly repetitive work that could | be automated if they knew how to code. | me_me_me wrote: | There was that famous story of a guy who stop showing up to | work and got caught years later for stealing from his company | by not working and getting wages. | | Its sort of similar situation. | twox2 wrote: | A lot of industries, despite being "tech", are still just | using computers to "push paper". That means a true technical | person can often automate these jobs. It's real and it does | happen. The thing is... most people like that are not content | doing that and then fucking around all day. I've been in this | position. I've shared my automation with the team I was on | and the manager I had, and I got a raise. I did this at more | than one company when I worked in operational roles, since | then I'm more engineering focused so less opportunities to do | so. | BlueTemplar wrote: | Yeah, just consider all the places where PDFs are still | used instead of a more computer-appropriate format (fixed | layout is generally not needed, sometimes even not for | printing, and is sometimes even an hindrance, and (m)HTML | can be used as a standalone file too...) | twox2 wrote: | Most opportunities are definitely data-entry oriented. | For example, making a report in a spreadsheet and then | having to feed some of those fields into some kind of | form in a web-based UI, or vice versa. | radicalbyte wrote: | Same here - my first real job involved putting reports | together by collecting/combining data from various sources. | | Spent the first month doing it be hand, second month I | pulled an all-nighter and automated the easy 80%. The last | 20% of automation involved switching from Excel to a | website - that took a couple of years to make happen | because I needed to convince people to make the change. | | I spent the time I received improving my skills and | automating other things, as well as helping colleges with | work which did require manual intervention. | [deleted] | Melatonic wrote: | Sounds like your friend is a hell of a lot more honest than | that guy who took on multiple sysadmin positions and then | automated almost everything and for the remainder hired | multiple overseas contractors to do the rest | [deleted] | tharne wrote: | My guess is that a great many of these stories are true. I've | seen more than one instance at large companies where a job | either was, or easily could be, mostly replaced by a series | of Excel Macros. | andrew_ wrote: | A very good friend of mine has done almost the same thing | (except he works from home for different reasons). He's done | this with three companies in the 10 years I've known him. | It's not fiction - this kind of thing is completely doable | with the tools we have available now, and the antiquated | thinking that many offices are still run by. | svachalek wrote: | 20 years ago this was a super common situation. There were so | many jobs that were easily automated and just hadn't received | that treatment yet. I even had software engineers on some of | my teams that were basically just template generators. | Another table, write code with all the new columns and types. | | Most companies have cleared out the lowest hanging fruit by | now but I'm sure there are still a lot of jobs everywhere | that can either be easily automated now, or would be easily | automated except for one little obstacle the worker is doing | everything possible to play up and preserve. | mywittyname wrote: | Tech workers tend to under-estimate the impact that trivial | automation can have on other industries. My partner 10x or | more their efficiency with some simple Office macro copy- | pasta from the search results of "how do I <do thing> in | word" | AeroNotix wrote: | When I worked at HP over a decade ago it was literally my job | to walk into a department and find processes that were | automatable, implement whatever program or automation was | necessary and gtfo. | | One of the highlights for me when working there was | automating a process which took three people thirty days to | perform. I made a point to unnecessarily optimize the program | to the point where it ran in a handful of milliseconds. | | These kinds of low-hanging fruits are all over certain | industries and companies which aren't primarily software- | development based. | | I sort of miss it, in ways. | HeyLaughingBoy wrote: | Yup. That reminds me of a time when a co-worker in another | department (technical but not software) told me that the | people she managed had to do a very tedious task extracting | and cross-correlating data from files that my project | produced. They were sometimes spending 4+ hours each day | doing it. | | It took me all of one lazy afternoon to build a utility to | do the same work and present it in a nicely formatted | report. Their workload on this task went down to about 5 | minutes per day. | jacquesm wrote: | A good way to make friends too. | macintux wrote: | Not the people whose jobs likely went away as a result, | however. | runevault wrote: | It depends on the company. My day job can reduce required | headcount for the work we handle. Some companies use that | excuse to lower headcount, but in cases where valuable | employees are involved they get moved to other jobs where | their knowledge can add value while not doing the boring | and repetitive tasks. | munk-a wrote: | You'd be surprised how often that isn't the outcome. It | definitely does happen, but a lot of the time the company | is left with a task that's now automated and an employee | that's received a ton of training on the business | systems. There are almost always other products that | sales wants to push that there simply wasn't the | bandwidth for before... | | There is _always_ more business - sometimes companies | choose to put automated employees towards that (and get | huge moral boosts to the employees that automated the | thing - the employees that were automated - and everyone | nearby who appreciates how useful automation is) and | other times they decide to trim a marginal cost off the | bottom line and end up discouraging further innovation | and, probably, losing a lot of people they actually still | need. | | Companies that, essentially, get some of their labour | replaced for a free (or marginal cost) should realize | that there are a lot of more savings like that to be had | - and that if they use that savings to invest in growth | it will pay off in the future. Companies that choose | stagnation die (and you should leave them to die without | you as an employee). | lovehashbrowns wrote: | Had something similar at a larger company I worked at! | There was this team that was tasked with automating stuff | from the other teams. And then they got split up and | individuals were sprinkled around the company. I guess it | was sorta like embedded devops in a way because they were | supposed to spread that "automate stuff" mindset. | | Thinking about it now, it makes sense. It's a bit of a | waste to have one team that automates stuff, and everyone | else just thinks of automation as "that's not our job!" | arethuza wrote: | 2 jobs ago I had a management level position ("Head of | Architecture") for a decent sized engineering | multinational. | | My fondest moments are actually when I helped people do | mind numbingly awful tasks by automating stuff - this was | _not_ my day job but I had a lot of freedom. | | One guy was so delighted that I had scripted in less than | an hour some ghastly bit of spreadsheet work that he | estimated was going to take him a few weeks that he | immediately ran out and bought me a bottle of wine! | AeroNotix wrote: | This is partly why I miss it, sometimes. The work itself | is largely pretty easy to do and the impact can be huge. | Not just in a time-saving way, but to the people involved | and ultimately the company. | | I often think about the sheer volume of tasks like this | the world over where a tiny Python, or even say, | AutoHotKey script could automate it. The amount of hours | mankind must spend on utter drudgery astounds me. | readams wrote: | Anti work seems to be very much like incels but for jobs. | Extremely unhealthy and counterproductive approaches upvoted | highly. | Gravityloss wrote: | I wonder what's the dynamic that leads to this. Same with | some localized cultural phenomena here that peddle "silver | water" as cure for many illnesses. Or some news channels | giving quite odd health advice... | mikkelam wrote: | Another take: Antiwork is a much needed uprising in america | for low paid workers to finally stand together and stop | dealing with an unfair system. | | Hopefully it trickles into the real world, before it is | stopped | vsareto wrote: | They're plainly against any work at all right now. If they | shift towards better working conditions and pay, then | great. | alecbz wrote: | That subreddit's a mixed bag from what I remember. | | I think there's a core of "true" antiworkers that are | genuinely against the idea of working (categorically? | within capitalism?) in some deep philosophical sense, but | I think most of the sub are people that are okay with the | _idea_ of work but are very unhappy with current working | conditions. | | I remember there being fights between them where the | diehards would post stuff like "if you're a 'work | reformist' this sub isn't for you" but the comments would | be full of people telling them to stop gate keeping. | droptablemain wrote: | That's the general gist as I recall. A lot of people who | aren't structurally opposed to work but are opposed to | their relationship with production as workers. | Gigachad wrote: | If you take a look now, the sub is in a pretty poor | state. It's full of almost certainly fake stories and | what seem to be actual children. A lot of the demands / | proposals posted are extremely counterproductive or not | useful. And I assume the actual elite thrive on the fact | that the general public don't actually know what they | need and instead waste time calling for nonsensical | change. | The-Bus wrote: | Those complaints have been raised for the last two | decades and weren't heard. | onemoresoop wrote: | There's a guy named Josh Fluke on YouTube who may qualify as | antiwork to you. I find him very very reasonable and a bit | dangerous for pulling off the wool over the young | generation's eyes. I mean dangerous for the corporate and the | myths corporations have built to lure and abuse workers. | borvo wrote: | hmm does he make any money from his youtube channel? | matsemann wrote: | Don't be like this: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we- | should-improve-society-som... | K7PJP wrote: | It's anti-work, not anti-money. | tsol wrote: | I think the point is it's easy to be critical of work if | you can make money without working. But for most people, | doing menial work is a necessity in order to earn a | living. If he has to deal with the consequences of not | working I'd be inclined to take him more seriously, but | fact of the matter is no one really wants to be homeless | on principal | themodelplumber wrote: | The creative writing argument is used all over the place on | Reddit though. I once shared an anonymized true crime story | that you could verify by reading the previous week's local news | where I live, and about half the comments on the thread were | people saying it was obviously fictional, congrats on becoming | a crime novelist, etc. | | Among other things I think it really says something about the | way people choose to look into, or not look into things. In a | lot of cases it would really easy to casually verify these | stories, even if offline or via PM, rather than going with the | straight-up subjective interpretation. | Kluny wrote: | I couldn't say whether this story is true or not, but I do have | to remind myself to steer clear of /r/antiwork and take it with | a grain of salt. I'm a person who is happy when I'm working | hard, and my current life goals include gaining skills in an | industry where I can't really operate as a solo entrpreneur | with a startup business. I need a job where I can learn, and I | need to work hard, both for my goals and for my own happiness. | Reading too much /r/antiwork makes me bitter and angry, which | colors my relationships with my coworkers and employer. It's | not good for me, even though I agree with most of their | philosophical points (ie, pro-union, don't work for free, | insist on your rights, etc). | ecf wrote: | And people wonder why a lot of those in the IT field have a hard | time being respected. | fcb92019 wrote: | jacquesm wrote: | Reminiscent of the best of 'Max Klein' aka Mark Essien. So likely | fiction. | webmaven wrote: | I think stories like this are read more widely than a lot of | folks in forums such as HN suppose (often forwarded via email), | and provide additional motivation for workplace surveillance | solutions. | | After all, if a manager can identify when tasks are being | automated away by an idle employee, they've also identified a | task that can be done manually by a cheaper employee. The | alternative is getting rid of the position entirely and keeping | the automation, but then the manager has to take responsibility | for pushing the button. | wombat-man wrote: | This is like the dream. I feel like I would spend the time | learning an instrument, or maybe do online learnings to maybe get | another job I actually enjoyed doing. | | Can't even hate and hope things work out for that guy. | padobson wrote: | _This is like the dream._ | | If eight hours a day of free time is the only thing separating | you from your dream, then there must be SOME way to adjust the | math of your life to get that for at least a period long enough | to learn the instrument or train for a new job or both. | | Reducing your monthly expenses by 1/12 means you could take a | full month off and get a jump start on the training you want. | You could also add overtime or a part time job and increase | your income by 1/12 and then take two months off. Think of it | like buying your freedom. | AuryGlenz wrote: | That math gets a lot harder when you have a family. | antihero wrote: | Eight hours of free-time AND eight hours extra mental energy. | wombat-man wrote: | yeah it's not just the time. I am kinda tired at the end of | the day. Certainly too tired to whole heartedly take on a | non-trival side project. I need 'non productive' activities | like meeting up with friends or some kind of recreation. | wobblybubble wrote: | "The only thing"--only half of all weekdays if one follows | the in-bed-for-eight hours recommendation. And you of course | have to eat and groom yourself outside of those hours. | | I'm not saying that you are wrong. But it seems weird to | dismiss a whopping 40 hours a week as a seemingly small | thing. | wombat-man wrote: | I'm in a good place now. But if I were getting paid | essentially for free, I might just take on another job. But | given his current job is $90k, I'd maybe start thinking about | shooting for a higher paying remote gig. | | Instrument mastery is a much longer process as far as I can | tell. Takes years. | andrewcarter wrote: | I learned to play the fiddle the past two years working from | home during Xcode's abysmal compile times. Sadly my new M1 max | whatever has solved that problem, ha! | my_usernam3 wrote: | Relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/303/ | | Truth be told I'm a sucker for an enterprise software | position with long compile time. | jstx1 wrote: | In my experience it gets boring very quickly. In my case I | hadn't automated anything, the company was just bad at | utilizing their staff and they were happy to keep me on the | payroll doing next to nothing. It resulted in my worrying about | skills deteriorating and being more depressed than usual. | mlindner wrote: | /r/antiwork is a horrible cess pool of bad articles that makes | you feel worse about yourself. Highly advise against the click. | cityofdelusion wrote: | I had a prior job out of college where I automated the vast | majority of the technical position I was in. It was a combination | sys admin and data validation role for the government -- not | really my interest, but it was after the economy melted down and | finding a proper programming job was tough. Over the span of | about a year, I had a set of scripts, batch jobs, and other forms | of OS/database level automation that made most of the manual | tasks we had obsolete. | | Unlike the original article though, I went to my manager and | bragged about it. My manager was ecstatic and had me deploy the | same set of scripts to the entire team. I would now be in charge | of coding it full-time and got to implement things like | authentication, a UI, reports, a dashboard, and so on. I | eventually left that job because I was desiring a more proper | engineering role, but it was a good case of win-win for full- | blown automation. It didn't replace any humans (though it | certainly could have), but instead our management had use it to | enhance the existing humans and have them scale. | comprev wrote: | I have automated a "release engineer" out of a job. Yea, the | irony is strong. | fcb92019 wrote: | nicklaf wrote: | This story reminds me of a junior developer named Mac [0]: | | _Once upon a time, long ago, there was a company of Lisp | programmers. It was so long ago, in fact, that Lisp had no | macros. Anything that couldn 't be defined with a function or | done with a special operator had to be written in full every | time, which was rather a drag. Unfortunately, the programmers in | this company--though brilliant--were also quite lazy. Often in | the middle of their programs--when the tedium of writing a bunch | of code got to be too much--they would instead write a note | describing the code they needed to write at that place in the | program. Even more unfortunately, because they were lazy, the | programmers also hated to go back and actually write the code | described by the notes. Soon the company had a big stack of | programs that nobody could run because they were full of notes | about code that still needed to be written. | | In desperation, the big bosses hired a junior programmer, Mac, | whose job was to find the notes, write the required code, and | insert it into the program in place of the notes. Mac never ran | the programs--they weren't done yet, of course, so he couldn't. | But even if they had been completed, Mac wouldn't have known what | inputs to feed them. So he just wrote his code based on the | contents of the notes and sent it back to the original | programmer. | | With Mac's help, all the programs were soon completed, and the | company made a ton of money selling them--so much money that the | company could double the size of its programming staff. But for | some reason no one thought to hire anyone to help Mac; soon he | was single- handedly assisting several dozen programmers. To | avoid spending all his time searching for notes in source code, | Mac made a small modification to the compiler the programmers | used. Thereafter, whenever the compiler hit a note, it would | e-mail him the note and wait for him to e-mail back the | replacement code. Unfortunately, even with this change, Mac had a | hard time keeping up with the programmers. He worked as carefully | as he could, but sometimes-- especially when the notes weren't | clear--he would make mistakes. | | The programmers noticed, however, that the more precisely they | wrote their notes, the more likely it was that Mac would send | back correct code. One day, one of the programmers, having a hard | time describing in words the code he wanted, included in one of | his notes a Lisp program that would generate the code he wanted. | That was fine by Mac; he just ran the program and sent the result | to the compiler. | | The next innovation came when a programmer put a note at the top | of one of his programs containing a function definition and a | comment that said, "Mac, don't write any code here, but keep this | function for later; I'm going to use it in some of my other | notes." Other notes in the same program said things such as, | "Mac, replace this note with the result of running that other | function with the symbols x and y as arguments." | | This technique caught on so quickly that within a few days, most | programs contained dozens of notes defining functions that were | only used by code in other notes. To make it easy for Mac to pick | out the notes containing only definitions that didn't require any | immediate response, the programmers tagged them with the standard | preface: "Definition for Mac, Read Only." This--as the | programmers were still quite lazy--was quickly shortened to "DEF. | MAC. R/O" and then "DEFMACRO." | | Pretty soon, there was no actual English left in the notes for | Mac. All he did all day was read and respond to e-mails from the | compiler containing DEFMACRO notes and calls to the functions | defined in the DEFMACROs. Since the Lisp programs in the notes | did all the real work, keeping up with the e-mails was no | problem. Mac suddenly had a lot of time on his hands and would | sit in his office daydreaming about white-sand beaches, clear | blue ocean water, and drinks with little paper umbrellas in them. | | Several months later the programmers realized nobody had seen Mac | for quite some time. When they went to his office, they found a | thin layer of dust over everything, a desk littered with travel | brochures for various tropical locations, and the computer off. | But the compiler still worked--how could it be? It turned out Mac | had made one last change to the compiler: instead of e-mailing | notes to Mac, the compiler now saved the functions defined by | DEFMACRO notes and ran them when called for by the other notes. | The programmers decided there was no reason to tell the big | bosses Mac wasn't coming to the office anymore. So to this day, | Mac draws a salary and from time to time sends the programmers a | postcard from one tropical locale or another._ | | [0] https://gigamonkeys.com/book/macros-defining-your-own.html | smm11 wrote: | I worked at a Big Important Place, and two or three times a day | I'd shut down an online transaction system, back up a file, move | a new file into place, then bring the online transaction system | back up. Took maybe two minutes. | | On any given day, I'd do literally five minutes of work, maybe | eight. | | I didn't need to check any logs at the end of the day. That | wasn't my job. | dccoolgai wrote: | Some of these firms literally give their associate attorneys | $400K bonuses (on top of a 200-300K salary). I wouldn't feel bad | about it. | reaperducer wrote: | I automated the most time-consuming tasks of my job about a year | after I joined the company. | | Instead of sitting back and gloating about it on social media, I | used the extra time to take on additional projects and to help | other departments in order to increase my value to the company. | | When the COVID cuts came, I was labeled "essential" staff. So | while the rest of my department was downsized from over 50 people | to fewer than 10, I was able to keep my job. | | I'm glad I took the high road. | gumbotron wrote: | tibbar wrote: | As a company it can be really hard to assess whether your | problems require permanent employees or whether a contractor | could just come in and give you a button to click. Sometimes you | actually know about the second option, but the process is so | important that you want someone technical to monitor the results | of clicking the button everyday. Because if the button stops | working, or does the wrong thing and you don't know, the results | are disastrous. So his employer might actually prefer this | arrangement to having him just give them the script and walk | away. | keiferski wrote: | This story is a pretty accurate fable for the pointlessness of | the modern economy and its inability to provide real value to | anyone. Man spends all day playing video games, because he | automated his largely superfluous job at a law firm which itself | likely only exists to deal with bureaucratic or unnecessary cases | (assuming this is true, as they have a single absent IT person | who handles their entire infrastructure.) | | On top of all that, this story itself is probably made up, | created to get attention from other people in pointless jobs. | It's a meta-exercise in pointlessness. | Melatonic wrote: | If the law firm is making significant profit and this employee | is not doing anything additionally shady does it really matter? | He provides value to the company regardless of whether or not | he is actively working - and if one of his automations fail | then he is the one who has to fix it. There are lots of jobs | where we pay people for things that do not require a constant | work output - think about Firemen for example. | | A forward thinking business would promote this guy and then | involve him in other aspects of their work to try and optimize | and automate wherever they can. The better small / medium size | businesses recognize this and realize that IT can be thought of | not just as a cost center but also a path to innovation. | eterevsky wrote: | He is not paid just to transfer files. He is paid to be | responsible for the files being transferred. It's not quite the | same thing. | Sebb767 wrote: | Are you sure the boss would agree, if he would fully know and | understand the situation? | Gigachad wrote: | Because humans are irrational. It's the butts in seats | mentality vs results. The business should be bringing in | experts to regularly work out what parts of their process | are slow and to streamline them. There is no incentive for | an individual not in this role to make their lives harder. | bonoboTP wrote: | This is information asymmetry that employers also weaponize | to hide the true value produced by each employee. Would | employees agree to their salary if they fully understood | how much of the value they create is pocketed at various | other levels of the org? | garrickvanburen wrote: | This. He's being paid to be responsible for the system. If he | can do that successfully a few minutes a day. Cool. If his | employer still sees value. It's all good. | Gigachad wrote: | It's really on the business to have some kind of continual | improvement process that looks at everyone's workflow and | works out where the time/resource wastage is. If the | company wanted to save money on these things they have get | someone to identify that a lot of time is spent on "manual" | work which could be streamlined. | sam_lowry_ wrote: | I hope he read David Graeber's Bullshit Jobs. | hogrider wrote: | This one is the text book definition of fall guy as a | service. Anything goew wrong, it's his head, that's why the | pay him. | [deleted] | pavel_lishin wrote: | > _the pointlessness of the modern economy and its inability to | provide real value to anyone_ | | Plenty of people get value out of the modern economy. There are | always outliers, and OP is a Spiders Georg. | patrickk wrote: | This description falls under the "duct tapers" category of | Bullshit Jobs[1], according to David Graeber: | | > duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed | permanently, e.g., programmers repairing bloated code, airline | desk staff who calm passengers whose bags do not arrive; | | In this case, perhaps its easier and cheaper to simply pay this | guy 90k per year to run this script rather than get an entire | law firm, likely staffed by extreme tech Luddites, to switch to | using the cloud solution properly. | | I've also seen worse waste in other industries. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs#Summary | ironmagma wrote: | Is that really bullshit work? I seriously doubt you'd be able | to completely solve the problem of lost luggage. You could | cut it down, yet you can't scale down the number of jobs | dealing with it very easily (one per airport at least, and | you can't hire half a person if there's only half a | workload). | | A similar thing could be said of bloated code. | Riseed wrote: | > you can't hire half a person if there's only half a | workload | | True. You can, however, hire one person to do one full | workload that's made up of fractional workloads. | mirkules wrote: | I know nothing about luggage transit, and any idea of a | solution for lost luggage I could come up with is more | likely naive than not. | | Could you define why lost luggage is an unsolvable problem? | What makes it so difficult? | gernb wrote: | probably not relevant but one time my mid-trip flight | landed late. I ran to the connecting flight and made it | on board but my luggage did not. I did get it the next | day so the system worked but it just points out a | complication I hadn't personally considered before. | 5bolts wrote: | logistics.. its amazing that MORE luggage isn't lost on a | daily basis. I traveled every week for 10 years, lost my | bag maybe 4 times? usually around a holiday where the | airports are burdened with extra people (and 75% of those | lost bags were out of O'Hare... ) | | sure it seems simple take a bag put it in a tube, take it | off the tube give it back to the person.. but man, | probably 30 people touched that bag in that process, | countless conveyer belts, several trucks.. add in TSA and | it doubles the handling | ironmagma wrote: | There's also significant fanout and sometimes very short | layovers. One plane might have luggage that goes to five | other planes. Also, the vehicles that transport the | luggage are not airtight, so bags can fall out of them. | This isn't to mention human error in the scanning process | (forgetting to scan something, scanning a bag and then | not moving it, etc.). | [deleted] | pavel_lishin wrote: | Isn't this more of a box-ticker? OP created a permanent | solution; at this point, however, he himself is not doing | anything useful: | | > _box tickers, who create the appearance that something | useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey | administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate | compliance officers, quality service managers;_ | topaz0 wrote: | Hired as a duct-taper, he turned himself into a box-ticker | by doing this automation. | repomies69 wrote: | > This story is a pretty accurate fable for the pointlessness | of the modern economy and its inability to provide real value | to anyone. | | Yeah absolute true man. In past times economy provided real | value. Modern economy can't produce shit. No clean water, no | medicine, no holidays... Nowadays life is just suffering and | 100 years ago economy was providing real value all the time. | | Anyway, can you pass the bong plz | lolc wrote: | It looks like this is a case where everybody is happy. A process | that was plagued by manual errors now runs smoothly. And there is | an admin around to jump in should it break. While the firm might | be indignant if they found out, they may actually already know | and just accept it. They're unlikely to change it if it runs | well. | | On the other hand, I don't think I could work like that. I always | look for ways to improve life, and that includes the life of my | customers. Not letting them know that the thing is automated | keeps them in the belief that it requires manual action, and that | to me is a lie by omission. Likely there are other low-hangig | fruit to automate, once you're in the mindset. | | Another consideration is when the script does something dumb a | human wouldn't have done. Is the operator liable for that? | Because after all it was not considered part of the job to | automate it? Of course, the likelihood of human mistakes weighs | more in all likelihood. But when the firm argues (they're lawyers | right?) that the mistakes wouldn't have happened if the employee | followed protocol, there may be some ugly liability. | leetcrew wrote: | > While the firm might be indignant if they found out, they may | actually already know and just accept it. They're unlikely to | change it if it runs well. | | if they knew, they might be tempted to fire the person and keep | the script. OP talks a big game about how it's running on their | own hardware, but the company has a legal claim if it was | developed during the workday. not smart to play legal games | with a law firm. | CodeyWhizzBang wrote: | The reality is, their core business is law. They probably | don't hugely care about IT as long as it works. | | The most likely thing, if they found out, is they'd give him | some other IT stuff to do as well to fill his time (which he | may also be able to automate). I doubt they'd want to fire | him - as long as the task is being done appropriately. | Kon-Peki wrote: | Maybe, but unlikely. | | They want someone to be available to fix/update and perhaps | do other things too. Part of your salary as support staff is | _being there_ when they need you. | Hamuko wrote: | Yeah, if this is something that is integral to their work, | they'd still need to pay someone to be able to respond | within X amount of minutes in case something goes tits up | even if they got the script in their hands. | | They could probably do that for less than 90k/year, but | it's still gonna cost them. | bena wrote: | It was literally developed for them. He even explains that he | has no intention of selling it because it is pretty much | custom to the one place. | rileymat2 wrote: | There are some interesting corner cases. For instance say | he purchased the script from a third party? Is that | different than if he wrote it on his off hours? | bena wrote: | The problem here is intent. His intention was to write a | script for his job. | | He can't hire himself to do his own job. Which is what he | would effectively be doing by claiming he wrote it "off | hours". The very act of writing that script put him "on | hours". Now, was it unpaid work? That's a different | story. Although since he's also technically not doing | work during work hours, one could call it a wash. | | If he bought the script, then the company likely needs to | reimburse him the cost of that, because its materials for | the job. But he wouldn't want to make that request, | because then the jig is up. | | But then again, we aren't playing "what ifs". There are | concrete elements to his story. He did write the script. | It is explicitly for this company. It won't work for any | other company without large modifications. The non- | portability and exclusivity of this script means it was | written for the express purpose of doing this thing for | this company. | | And let's be completely fair here, he cobbled this thing | together from StackOverflow snippets. If he's ever found | out and fired, even if he takes his script, they're | probably looking at a day or two to replicate this work. | | The real question for him is would it be worth it? The | firm would be minimally affected and could, in turn, make | things incredibly difficult for him. This is a law firm. | This is what they do. The cost of suing him is | negligible, because they already do so much of the work | normally. We're really talking about the additional court | and filing fees. Whereas, he'd have to retain a lawyer | himself. Who would then bill him for all the work they'd | do. | | Consider, they were paying him $90k to copy files. They | have that kind of money to throw at the problem. Do you | really want to become a problem? | paganel wrote: | I did a similar thing almost 20 years ago, I had to manually | verify that the image files from one network drive were the same | as the image files from a different location (some internal web- | page, I think, I had file access to them, too). That was taking | me about one hour each working day, in fact each working | night/morning, as this was a night job and I had to do that at | the end of the shift (6-7AM). | | I had started learning some PHP but very quickly realised (by | reading on the web) that Python was way better for this job. With | the help with the Python docs page, the Python mailing list (very | friendly back then with newbies, maybe still is, haven't been | there for a long time), of tkinter (excellent library!) and of | py2exe I was able to write a quick script on my Mandrake distro | at home, turn that script into an .exe, copy it to a floppy disk | and use it at work. Just like that, an ~1 hour job turned into a | maximum 2-minute job, the time it took me to open the tkinter- | based "program" and press a button or two. One or two years later | I was getting my first job as a computer programmer, writing | Python, thanks in part to that realisation of "I can make this | thing way faster and easier by using Python". | lordnacho wrote: | People are focusing too much on whether the story is actually | true. It sounds plausible to me, but the real story here is that | a heck of a lot of processes would benefit from having a | programmer look at them. | | Programming is the new literacy. People who can do it are on a | different plane to people who can't. | wobblybubble wrote: | > Programming is the new literacy. People who can do it are on | a different plane to people who can't. | | This is what I believe sometimes. | | Then I look at all the pitfalls of shell scripts and how the | time investments on automation tasks just balloon... then not | so much. :) | | But if people have a different experience with that then I | don't doubt it. | AussieWog93 wrote: | YMMV, but I'm 100% in agreement with GP about programming | being the new literacy. I quit my old SWE job to run a bloody | eBay store and am raking it in because I'm competing against | people who can't program. | | The trick, though, IMO, is not having a programmer solve the | problem but getting people with domain expertise literate | enough to write some hacky Python scripts. | | This is, in my honest opinion, the next leap forward in terms | of productivity. | lordnacho wrote: | This is exactly right. People who are actual programmers | are like poets, essayists, or authors in the original | literacy. They have a title that actually says "person is | literate". | | But there were always great poets and authors. The big win | was that you got a bureaucrat class with their own domain | titles who could use writing to get things done. | | Likewise if the boss in the original article had been | taught how to hack some scripts together, they wouldn't | need to hire the author for $90k. | rustyboy wrote: | I worked as an analyst and was able to automate a job people | in my shoes spent ~100 hours a year in doing. It was a huge | success. | | Until we needed a machine to run it, with good security | controls, high availability... blah blah blah. | | We're at the point where most people can find low hanging | fruit by reading a Python blog in a weekend, but in my | experience the IT infrastructure isn't setup to easily do | everything else. | geocrasher wrote: | When I was in high school (early 90's) I was a TA in drivers ed | for a period. I also took the class the period before it. My | job? Enter grades into the computer and run it for the teacher | so he didn't have to. When I asked him about what grades to put | in for myself he said "Just give yourself A's". So I did. Also | aced the DMV written and drivers test 100%. But that's besides | the point. I had the knowledge, so I didn't have to work the | same as other kids. Been that way ever since! | howmayiannoyyou wrote: | Love the poster's ingenuity and hate his attitude, and the | antiwork subreeddit. | | Attitude: $90,000 per year isn't likely to generate enough money | for this person's retirement, particularly if they encounter | major expenses. He should be spending his new free time either | developing a side-hustle, a business, or delivering additional | value for his employer for which he must insist on additional | compensation. I used to be well aware of evidence & case | management systems and this person is one decision away from | existing software making his perceived job less relevant. | | Antiwork: I entered the workforce during a deep recession, and I | was a recruiter for infoTech during another recession. I've | traveled extensively overseas for work. It will be an employers | market eventually, perhaps soon, and the antiwork crowd is going | to meet reality head-on when it happens. Nothing wrong with | ditching bad employers & developing side-hustles. There is | something wrong with demonizing work. Part (by no means all) of | the growth one sees abroad is due to acceptance and often | positive attitudes about work, with less emphasis on "fairness". | Life isn't even close to fair and some societies and people | understand how to work with that better than others do. | | Let the downvoting and flaming begin (sadly). | micromacrofoot wrote: | >$90,000 per year isn't likely to generate enough money for | this person's retirement | | uhhh... what? that's almost double the average US salary | | >Life isn't even close to fair and some societies and people | understand how to work with that better than others do. | | "Life isn't fair" is not an argument against striving for | fairness. My understanding of the antiwork people is that they | think they're being more productive than what they're being | paid for, and often being treated poorly along the way. There's | data backing that up, and it doesn't seem ridiculous to try and | recapture some of that. | Ostrogodsky wrote: | Meh,plenty of deluded kids there, but the core idea is | basically true. Nobody is arguing against work per se (most | healthy humans like to do stuff), they are arguing about the | XXI century version of soulless indentured service many jobs | are. Productivity exploded in the last 50 years and yet the | people are still running the same thread-mill for even less | benefits so I dont blame anybody who gives the middle-finger to | the corporate world and try to find an alternative. | anotherman554 wrote: | The amount you need in retirement is roughly proportional to | how much you spend while working, so that if you save 15% of | your gross salary throughout your career and invest it in | stock, you should be able to retire by 65 and maintain a | similar lifestyle in retirement to what you lived while | working. The salary is not what matters, it is the savings | rate. | giantg2 wrote: | "$90,000 per year isn't likely to generate enough money for | this person's retirement, particularly if they encounter major | expenses." | | This simply isn't true in most areas. You can live a modest | lifestyle and have a very good chance of retirement at a | "normal" retirement age (60-65). The median US software dev | makes about $110k and is one of the more highly compensated | jobs. I make about the same as the poster, and I'm actually in | decent shape for retirement, even with a family. | | On the second point I sort of agree. Why not take a second job | and make more? | MSFT_Edging wrote: | The side-hustle culture is a cancer. > delivering additional | value for his employer for which he must insist on additional | compensation | | Good luck with that. | | /r/antiwork is a societal response to this exact sentiment. "Oh | make a decent amount more than the national average and still | cant afford to retire? Simple, monetize what little free time | you have left!" | | No, the requirement for a side-hustle is due to the decades of | upper management and C-levels taking advantage of employees and | leading the stagnation of wages. | | The solution to a systemic issue is a systemic solution. The | personal responsibility solutions are just a distraction. | | Good on the op for getting back some of his time. | mbg721 wrote: | A traditional side-hustle wouldn't be for the same employer | (or any at all). | vsareto wrote: | >and the antiwork subreddit | | I thought r/antiwork was really about calling out abusive | employers and guiding us to better work/life relationship, but | it is actually against all work in any form. Meaning, if your | house catches fire, it's up to you to put it out - they don't | want anyone employed as professional firefighters who might | actually know WTF they're doing. Medical problems? Fix it | yourself. There's no paramedics to respond, no surgeons to fix | you, no pharmacists for drugs, no nurses/techs for recovery. | | If it was a movement about fixing worker conditions (a | submarine advertisement for unions, if you will), it'd actually | be a good movement. But right now, it's positioning itself as | just an angry outcry forum that apparently wants the planet to | be ruled by anarchy and extreme independence. | | What a waste of potential. If you don't believe me, try asking | them what the good industries are that have good work/life | balance. The answers you'll get boil down to "there are no good | jobs at all". | onemoresoop wrote: | I think it's a movement about fixing work conditions and | somewhat aggressive towards corporations and their practices. | Taking it to an extreme may be a push to kill off the | movement. | Miner49er wrote: | HN really lives in a some sort of wealthy bubble. $90k is | plenty of money to save for retirement in most of the country. | If it's not, then the majority of people in the US will never | be able to retire. | pseudo0 wrote: | Yeah, for reference the median _household_ income in the US | is under $70k. Of course cost of living depends a lot on the | locality, but 90k as a single person goes pretty far anywhere | other than the Bay Area, NYC, or a few other expensive hubs. | pietrovismara wrote: | OP doesn't realize that 87% of the US population (being one | of the richest in the world) makes less than $90k. | | That means that by his view 9 persons out of 10 won't be able | to retire. Which I actually believe is true. | | The irony of admitting this while at the same time praising | this system with statements like | | >Part (by no means all) of the growth one sees abroad is due | to acceptance and often positive attitudes about work, with | less emphasis on "fairness". | | What kind of growth are we seeing? Why should we have a | positive attitude about work, when it's just a mean of | transfering wealth upwards? | mech987 wrote: | Why is work just a means of transferring wealth upwards? | pietrovismara wrote: | That's what it has become in an economic system that | failed at its only task, ensuring proper distribution of | resources. Most jobs serve only the purpose of making a | restricted group of people richer, while stealing the | workers' time on earth and often worsening society. | | Edit: if you think that's not true, you live in a bubble. | Try some of the jobs the majority of the population has | to put up with, then we can talk again. | mbg721 wrote: | It's not enough to save for retirement in the US, and that | "majority will never be able to retire" is a reality in any | of the 50 states. We just haven't had it hit the fan yet. | | Edit: I read that as $90k total, to be dispensed over the | remaining years. I agree that $90k per year indeed ought to | be plenty. | bigyellow wrote: | Real inflation is like 20% in the US; none of us are | retiring any time soon. | StephenSmith wrote: | You're right, but inflation continues to outpace wages, so | without some, albeit extreme, push from the workers' side, this | will continue to get worse. | cityofdelusion wrote: | $90,000 per year is more than enough to max your 401k, an IRA, | and live anywhere that isn't a coastal city. | serverholic wrote: | Nobody asks to be born and society is setup to extract as much | as possible from you until you die. Fuck society, fuck | humanity, fuck productivity, and fuck work. It can all burn for | all I care. | | I'm saving as much money as I can to escape wage slavery then | just coasting the rest of my life without living another | productive second. | pietrovismara wrote: | > I'm saving as much money as I can to escape wage slavery | then just coasting the rest of my life without living another | productive second. | | In the meantime, don't forget to steal as much as you can | (https://repeaterbooks.com/product/steal-as-much-as-you- | can-h...). | leetcrew wrote: | > $90,000 per year isn't likely to generate enough money | | what? $90k is plenty for a frugal person to have a reasonable | retirement. they're not gonna be able to do it at 35, but mid | fifties is very viable. | efsavage wrote: | I once almost completely automated my job, and didn't hide it. | The job was to load data files into the backend system. The | problem was there there were almost as many formats (~80) as | there were partners sending data (~120), not just in structure | but in content (deltas, full replace, etc.). This job was burning | people out every 6 months, and I was the hapless next victim who | was just looking to break into a tech position. | | I started scripting and automating parts of it, which eventually | got pieced together to be completely hands off unless a new | partner came on board or there was some new error. Since some of | these steps used keyboard macros on VT100 terminals, I couldn't | even use my computer while it was running, so I requested | another, with the explicit intent that I could use it to surf the | web while my main computer was doing it's thing. Data load lag | times went from weeks, to days, to hours. | | When it came time for performance review, I was told I had | "completely redefined the position". I would therefore be | assessed against the new definition, and was therefore deemed | average, and got a 3% cost of living raise (pro-rated to 2% since | I'd only been there 8 months) with no merit increase. A few weeks | later, my manager was somehow surprised to the point of tears | that I had a new job elsewhere. | | A few months later, I got a call from my ex-manager, asking if I | had any backups of the programs I wrote (this was long before the | days of offsite source control). I said no, I had no need for | them and that would probably be illegal. My replacement had | somehow lost everything, and was now trying to keep up the old | burnout way and they were weeks behind. | TravelTechGuy wrote: | re: the performance review: don't know about your work place, | but the first quarterly review I got at [insert name of large | known company], my manger sat me down and explained she is | budgeted a certain amount of bonus points for her 5 team | members, and required to "grade on a curve". Hence, 1 team | member will be "above average", 3 will be "average", and one | "below average" every quarter. And for fairness, she rotates | the names. I was deemed "below average" since it was my first | quarter, but the good news, she said, is when she nominates me | for "average" next quarter, she'd add a "shows improvement" | comment to it! | | Bare in mind, real actual money was tied to this stupid scheme, | and you had to spend at least 2 hours writing a document | explaining what you've done for the company, the team and the | product, to justify your "averageness". | | I lasted 3 quarters in that social experiment. And I'll laugh | in the face of corporate recruiters till the day I die. | duxup wrote: | I worked at a company that operated like that. Each manager | could only put in so many high marks. | | Company had something like 5000 employees. | | I felt good that I often got the highest mark, but others | were doing well too, they deserved more. | | I finally asked my boss, he told me. | | "I figured out that other being told in an email how to award | perf reviews... nobody checks... so I give everyone the | highest reward." | sokoloff wrote: | Managers who just give everyone the highest rating are | generally the _reason_ that these forced curve policies are | created. | andrewflnr wrote: | That doesn't mean the managers are wrong. | sokoloff wrote: | That is definitely (and self-evidently) true! Of all | managers who rate everyone on their team as having | achieved the highest performance standard, what fraction | of those cases do you think are subjectively "correct"? | In my experience, it's way, way, way under half. | | Further, it's rare for the managers giving the 100% top | performance evaluation to individuals to be leading | groups with high overall accomplishment/delivery. | (Occam's Razor suggests that it's evidence of poor | leadership to be squandering the ability and | contributions of all these high-performers.) | Msw242 wrote: | Upper and middle management might be aware but every system | needs a release valve. E.g. you can't have juries without | the risk of jury nullification. | jokethrowaway wrote: | I've been on the other side of it. | | I hated it but I had to pick the X best in the team. You | should have reported your manager to HR. | noizejoy wrote: | As someone who's worked and managed in that type of | environment and later left that world to start small | companies, I was very glad, that this corporate insanity made | it possible to hire great individuals away from big | corporations. | another_story wrote: | I did something similar as a summer intern back in the late | 90s, but instead I got a permanent job offer at a rate 3x my | intern wage. Then, a few years later when the dotcom bust hit, | I became a bartender. | forinti wrote: | How can someone who "manages" not see the value in your work? | | It seems some people have a religious view of work: it is | valuable only if you are toiling and pushing yourself. | sam_goody wrote: | A Tale of Two Programmers should be required reading. Very | relevant. | | https://knowstuffs.wordpress.com/2012/08/13/the-parable-of-t... | fersho311 wrote: | That's a bit sad, the way you told the story sound like you | didn't make the place better even though you could have. | Tushon wrote: | How is that your conclusion? OP had a number of things that | were improved in-scope of his role, specifically cited this | was before offsite version control, and that his replacement | somehow deleted things. | throw8383833jj wrote: | are you kidding? he totally made the place better. did his | job infinitely better than the job description required and | what did he get for all his trouble? a big slap in the face | from his boss. of course he left and took his skills with | him. most companies just don't know how to recognize and | appreciate above average skills/productivity, this is sadly a | recurrent feature of many work places. | allenu wrote: | It sounded like their workplace essentially eliminated any | incentive to go beyond expectations after their job was | redefined. | rackjack wrote: | Not really his problem. | bqmjjx0kac wrote: | I think people are misunderstanding your comment. | | If I'm reading correctly, you're saying that it's sad that | their hard work went to waste. | squeaky-clean wrote: | It sounds like they did make the place better, and the | company stiffed them and they left and then things were no | longer better. | taberiand wrote: | Just once I would like to read one of these stories where the | conclusion is "and the company rewarded me with a large bonus | and a paid two weeks of leave, and when I came back they had | lined up some training and a project plan for me to stabilise | what I had built and automate as much of the drudgery as | possible" | nefitty wrote: | I tried to force this at a company I was at. I was like a | robot, automating as much as possible, anything and | everything I touched. Spreadsheets, data loading, surveys, | analytics, daily reports. I even built a chrome extension | to improve a cash transfer approval workflow. | | Weirdly enough, the director that forced me out had been a | programmer in a past life. All he could see of me was that | I was a cost center on his spreadsheet. He never sat down | with me to ask what I did all day. He'd see me in a corner | of the office wired in and I guess he assumed I was | watching cartoons or something. | | Fuck 'em. I left and I'm sure dozens of systems I had built | and maintained broke, just by virtue of my company email | address being shut down. I did try my best to document what | I could and onboard others. There's only so much you can do | in two weeks when you have to start with explaining what | Firebase and Google Apps Script is to multiple people. | [deleted] | mensetmanusman wrote: | I helped someone do this for their accounting job once since I | saw them working with obscure data re-entry moving from old DOS | systems to SAP. They had a ton of material to manually move over | and it seemed painful ergonomically. | | I used Sikuli from MIT to deal with the randomly changing window | locations. | | Management got mad at them for completing the task so quickly (it | took a week instead of a few months) since it fell on management | to deal with what to do with the data entries next, and they | didn't like a huge stack of work looming. Ha | oneoff786 wrote: | +1 for sikuli. Very nice little tool that makes it very easy to | do something that would otherwise require a lot of specific | knowledge | patrickk wrote: | AutoHotKey and Pulover's Macro Creator[1] (which spits out | AHK scrips from mouse and keyboard input) can do a similar | job in a windows environment, and can trivially click on UI | elements on the screen via PixelSearch. It runs lightning | fast too, and is simple to learn. | | I've used it to automate simple web games for shits and | giggles. | | [1] https://www.macrocreator.com/screenshots/ | Veen wrote: | Keyboard Maestro can do similar on the Mac with the "Find | Image on Screen" and "Click on Found Image" actions. You | can do some fairly sophisticated GUI automations with its | image, OCR, button clicking, JavaScript, and menu actions. | jodrellblank wrote: | A cross-platform fork of Sikuli is at | http://www.sikulix.com/ using Java, Python and OpenCV for | automation. | | PyAutoGui is another nice option - | https://pyautogui.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ - cross | platform Python module for keyboard and mouse automation | with some support for taking and analysing screenshots. | yosito wrote: | If you have the ability to automate your job, you could probably | sell the automation itself for 4-5x the amount you get paid to | manually do the job. | runjake wrote: | A lot of commenters are calling this fake. Maybe it is. But I | don't think it is. | | I know too many people who've done this during the pandemic, by | reading through Automate The Boring Stuff with Python[1] or | one[2] of a number[3] of PowerShell books and automate some/all | parts of their jobs. | | 1. https://automatetheboringstuff.com/ | | 2. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/powershell- | cookbook-4th... | | 3. https://www.amazon.com/Learn-Windows-PowerShell-Month- | Lunche... | fartcannon wrote: | As someone who definitely agrees that people shouldn't have to | work in poor conditions, I still cant help but feel that the | anti-work stuff on reddit seems coordinated. Does anyone else get | that feeling? | gruez wrote: | >I still cant help but feel that the anti-work stuff on reddit | seems coordinated. | | What sounds off to you? It seems pretty straightforward how the | "fake posts" can arise out of uncoordinated behavior. Antiwork | discusses various grievances that reddit's demographics has | (capitalism, under/un-employment, poor working conditions). | Readers are more likely to engage with topics that they're | passionate about, so the subreddit becomes a great place to | farm karma/upvotes, and content creators happily oblige. | ngngngng wrote: | I don't think so. Humans are pretty good at keeping in sync | with one another. This story and most on antiwork are likely | fake and people are just keeping in sync to play reddits upvote | game. | nthot wrote: | I get that feeling as well, fartcannon. The meteoric rise over | the past year of the subreddit just feels artficial. I don't | have any evidence outside of the a rapid increase of | subscribers. I'm sure there is a large number of people with | that sentiment out there, so I'd maybe put it at 40% or less | that this is being coordinated by an external actor. | | The whole sentiment around the subreddit really seems to be | amplifying a class war attitude in the United States. | | I remember reading an article (I think this was it [1]) about | reddit getting manipulated by advertisers. Either posting about | a product, or upvoting posts that were positive about a product | and downvoting negative posts. Imagine what someone with a | larger budget could do. | | [1] | https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaymcgregor/2017/02/20/reddit-i... | fartcannon wrote: | Some of the manipulation seems obvious. Some of it less so. I | always felt like some kind ublock origin style plugin that | highlights or removes known instances of | PR/manipulation/propanda would be helpful. Perhaps an AI | trained on press releases from big corps and governments that | performs authorship identification for a start. 'The writing | style in this post are an 80% match for a press release by | <government body> linked below'. Kind of like those websites | that try to identify fake product reviews. | | Theres a high chance that would probably get gamed, too, I | guess. | steve76 wrote: | Ajedi32 wrote: | Previous discussion about a similar situation: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14656945 | detcader wrote: | I once saw a presentation from a man who build entire products | this way. He automates hiring contractor devs based on their | review scores, sends them to a huge Trello board that they use to | self-onboard and then take on tasks, and automatically tracks of | their progress by Trello cards completed and amount of code | written. | | He said he just spends 10 minutes a day firing contractors that | aren't doing good enough, and maybe adding a new card to Trello | now and then. This presentation was almost a decade ago so this | automation might be a full product of its own by now. No saying | if his product was any good or still exists, though | kevingadd wrote: | Whether or not the original story is made up, I did this a long | time ago at my first sweng job. Because some of the leads hated | me, I got transferred to what was effectively a punishment team - | officially I was hired as a game designer and then officially | moved to the programming department, but then I was moved onto | "cinematics", which meant setting up shots, camera transitions, | and dialogue timing. Naturally I had zero qualifications to do | this. Another person moved onto the punishment team was a QA | tester that a lead had actively tried to block hiring. The | supposed justification for this was that cinematics were behind | schedule (this did seem to be true, at least). | | Anyway, within a couple weeks me and the QA tester (who also knew | how to code) had written a set of tools to make our work 3-4x | faster and improve quality, so the three of us got our work done | in a couple hours a day and spent the rest of it doing whatever | we wanted - watching tv, working on side projects, reading | programming books, etc. | | To me the best part was that if I hadn't automated this the rest | of the project would have fallen behind, because at that point | the entire design department relied on my unauthorized side | project (a comprehensive set of authoring and debugging tools for | the design team) and I spent some of my spare time maintaining | it. Game dev is wild. | steve_adams_86 wrote: | I once got a contract, early in my career, migrating marketing | landing pages to a new format in which the contents of the pages | (anything inside of the <body> tag) were moved into | `marketing_page_name.tmpl` files in a directory. From there | they'd be pulled into a shell, and all kinds of tracking and link | magic could happen from there. A few things like anchors needed | new template variables instead of hard-coded links. | | I realized I could automate this after the third or fourth page. | There were hundreds of them, so I did a quick calculation: How | long will it take to automate this? How long will it take to do | it by hand? You know, the one we always do, then ignore because | we want to automate stuff anyways. | | In this case the automation made sense. I was paid per hour so I | only stood to lose money. | | I realized automating it and lying about how long it's taking | would be immoral. I needed the money (I think this was my second | job, ever, before ever getting a full time job. Maybe year | 2005!). So what, do I just do it by hand and struggle through the | monotony? No, that would be dishonest in a sense, too. | | I talked to the people who contracted me and explained the | options, showed them a sample of how well the automation worked, | talked it through. They were really happy. They gained trust in | me and my abilities. After I completed the project, they wanted | to hire me for full time work. They gave me great references for | years. | | I couldn't handle automating my job away and slacking off. I love | learning. I love doing my best work for people, providing real | value. The cool thing to me about my job is that I can offer more | and more value over time at a scale I couldn't in any other job | my brain could navigate. | | So all that is to say: this guy's story sounds awful to me. Let | me automate it, then if I'm redundant, I'll go find something | else interesting to do. I'm sure as hell not going to sit around | playing counterstrike. | | Not to say this person is bad or wrong or whatever. It just | sounds like misery to me. The key difference might be that I | enjoy my work and this guy doesn't, really. | genmud wrote: | Hey everyone, look at this guy! With his moral compass and | stuff. Ain't never gonna get your own space rocket with that | attitude. | | All jokes aside, being trustworthy/ethical pays dividends over | the course of peoples lifetime and will often times reward you | in surprising ways. | steve_adams_86 wrote: | Haha. Absolutely, that has been my experience in and out of | work. | pixl97 wrote: | Heh, you're a great person, and a terrible consultant | | https://despair.com/products/consulting | armchairhacker wrote: | I think the r/antiwork mindset of "no loyalty, no social | connections, no extra effort, no two-weeks notice, work only | work the wage" only applies when you're working for a job that | treats you like shit. If you have a half-decent employer you | should provide some loyalty and extra effort when necessary or | you're a garbage employee. If you have a good career and you | get a bad employer you can just leave. | | The context with r/antiwork is that many of these people are in | extremely toxic workplaces but need money because they're very | poor. It's a free-for-all, "take advantage of" or "be taken | advantage of". And that most of the submissions are probably | fake dystopia rage-bait. | LanceH wrote: | It seems to be axiomatic there that all employers deserve | this treatment. Literally, "all", there is no wiggle room for | any company or manager. | | My concern is the bleedover into /r/jobs where I like to | answer with advice on how to handle a | situation/search/interview. | duderific wrote: | > The key difference might be that I enjoy my work and this guy | doesn't, really. | | He probably enjoyed it while he was working on the scripts, but | once he was done, there wasn't anything much else to do, so he | moved on to doing stuff he likes to do, while getting paid. | kumarvvr wrote: | I love these threads. | | As a rule, I always do the work assigned to me just a bit shy of | the target. | | And, I always automate my work. And I never say a word of it to | anyone. | | I work in an engineering firm and most of my colleagues are | clueless about programming. | | Am I cheating? Perhaps. Do I feel guilty? Absolutely not. | noasaservice wrote: | Same. | | I'm a systems engineer. I will always automate if it makes | sense. And depending on how the environment is, I may or may | not tell others about it. | | I think of automation like a box of tools. On journeyman jobs, | the tools are yours. You paid for them, and you have use of | them as you see fit. I think of automation the same. | | You're not buying my tools - you're buying my skills that bring | my tools. You quit paying, you quit getting work. In no world | do you get my tools. | bena wrote: | To those saying this can't be true, while it may be exaggerated, | I can believe the core of it. | | My first job was for a doctor who fancied himself a programmer. | He was a reseller of customizable medical software. The | customizations were essentially really simple config files. The | most complex thing was a half-baked pseudo HTML document | language. | | My job was "programmer". I was supposed to help customize and | maintain the system. | | This took absolutely no time at all. I filled my time with | skunkworks, busy work, education, and job searching. I think when | I left they eventually had to decommission the patient web portal | that I wrote and some other bits. Because they had no one to | update and maintain them. So when the parent company would change | the structure of the database, they couldn't reflect those | changes in what I made. | | One week, I probably spent way more time making a SVG/CSS eyeball | follow a mouse cursor than doing anything remotely related to my | job. | CountDrewku wrote: | Ugh that subreddit is just a cesspool. Most of the stories are | fake and it attracts the bottom feeders of society. | | People need work to feel fulfilled. I get that a corporate job | may not meet that demand but this idea that you can just eschew | any work and be mentally ok isn't true. | brimble wrote: | > People need work to feel fulfilled. | | I, too, worry about the idle rich and think we should do | something to help them find work. | vangelis wrote: | Work, as they say, makes you free. | dfadsadsf wrote: | Vast majority of rich are not idle and live very active life. | While they may not do work as you understand it, they do | philanthropy, investment, etc. Few if any just stay home to | watch TV - which is equivalent of automating work and not | telling anyone. | brimble wrote: | Oh. So making them not dependent on losing 8 hours of their | work per weekday to a boss, and giving them freedom to do | what they like in that time, _isn 't_ making their lives | worse? But if the same state is achieved by a poor person | then...? | | I would agree that also not needing to be available for a | boss _at all_ , even "just in case something goes wrong", | is better, but that doesn't seem to be the argument. | Rather, that attaining freedom from being told what to do | much of your waking hours is morally or psychologically | harmful. Which obviously becomes absurd when we apply it to | rich people. Which is my point. Why's it fine for one group | and something to worry about with another? | | [EDIT] More directly, I'm wary any time I encounter "be | careful with that freedom, poor people, it might be bad for | you, and I'm not sure we can trust you to do the right | thing with it! Rich people, carry on as you were, you're | all fine and need no oversight or pointers, obviously." as | an argument. | CountDrewku wrote: | Dude you're a fool if you don't think rich people put in | hours and hours of work. They're almost never not | working. Their entire lives typically revolve around work | and nothing else. | | You might have a point if you're talking trust fund | babies but those people are miserable because they do | nothing. They're not happy. The vast majority of wealth | is not handed down. | | >Rather, that attaining freedom from being told what to | do much of your waking hours is morally or | psychologically harmful. | | Do you understand how this is achieved at all???? BY HARD | WORK. Go out and create something of your own, no one is | stopping you. If you think it's not going to be work I've | got news for you. No one is going to just give you this | freedom, nor should they because it would then be | meaningless. | | I'm sorry but you just sound incredibly young, naive, and | lacking in any real world experience. You need to grow up | and realize that almost nothing in life that's easily | obtained is worth a shit. | brimble wrote: | > Dude you're a fool if you don't think rich people put | in hours and hours of work. They're almost never not | working. Their entire lives typically revolve around work | and nothing else. | | This is most people, rich or not. The rich just don't | _have to_ do work they aren 't _enthusiastically | choosing_ to do. The ~50% of normal folks ' work that | they're not paid to do--property maintenance, the boring | kind of shopping, cooking, driving themselves and others | around, fighting with insurance, keeping a schedule and | making appointments, cleaning, childcare, et c.--are, | tellingly, the kind of work that rich folks typically pay | others to do for them. What remains is work that is done | _purely_ by choice. Not only no boss, but no _personal_ | work that isn 't done by choice. That's the difference. | The "idle" poor still have more work _imposed_ on them-- | work they cannot avoid doing--than the "idle" rich, by a | long shot. | | So again: rich folks can have little to no work _imposed_ | on them (and in fact _pay_ to avoid nearly all such | imposition) and that 's fine, but if poor people are in | the situation of having merely _a substantial part_ , but | nowhere near all, of their required-work burden removed, | that may be a _bad thing_ for them and we should worry? | That seems odd. My "idle rich" quip has you responding | as if I've attacked something sacred, because, as you | state, most of those folks stay plenty busy, but if | that's the case, what's the motivation for worrying about | poor people not being able to do the same? | | It's also the case that having lots of money means being | able to turn hobbies into "work", and maybe even money- | making ventures, without ever having to do the parts you | don't want to. That looks an _awful lot_ like play, even | if it 's producing an income. Which, to be clear, I think | is _fine_. Shit, that 's exactly where I, and probably | most people, want to be. The part where I get lost is | when poor people gaining a fraction of that freedom is | worrisome. | | > Do you understand how this is achieved at all???? BY | HARD WORK. Go out and create something of your own, no | one is stopping you. If you think it's not going to be | work I've got news for you. No one is going to just give | you this freedom, nor should they because it would then | be meaningless. | | Where, exactly, the fuck, did I claim that getting rich | if you're not already rich is not, typically, very hard | work? | | > I'm sorry but you just sound incredibly young, naive, | and lacking in any real world experience. | | This is perhaps the most appropriate time I've ever | employed this: I'm rubber, you're glue. | | [EDIT] Are we using very different definitions of rich, | perhaps? I find this exchange baffling enough that I'm | beginning to wonder if we're operating from entirely | different terms. I wouldn't consider anyone who'd suffer | a large drop in quality of life if they decided to stop | working for several normally-work-aged years, to be rich. | That's what I mean by rich. Not an entrepreneur with a | whopping mid-seven-figures in the bank, or the owner of a | modestly successful local chain of stores, or anything | like that. People who hang out at expensive parts of the | "Med" and ski the Alps annually, despite living in the | US, who could afford a very nice new car _every month_ if | they decided that 's what they wanted, keep a personal | staff on payroll, and, crucially, who _don 't need to | work_ to keep doing that kind of thing indefinitely, are | rich. Fussell's "upper" and "top-out-of-sight", not his | "upper-middle" (who may do much of the above, but can't | keep doing it without continuing to work) and certainly | not anything lower than that. | hwbehrens wrote: | > _People need work to feel fulfilled._ | | While you're likely to get skewered for this line, I think it's | because of a mismatch in vocabulary that is being ignored. The | "work" in antiwork is usually referring to paid employment, but | it seems that you're using it more akin to fulfilling | accomplishment. I agree with you on the whole that people need | to feel that they are making a positive impact on their | surroundings to feel satisfaction. | | Maybe that comes from paid employment, or volunteer work, or | hobbies, or social interactions. A street preacher, a stay at | home parent, an ancient cave painter, a bricklayer, and a | software architect might all feel equally satisfied by their | work, irrespective of the value placed on that work by their | society. | | In fact, I would argue that the (professed) goals of antiwork | _are_ aligned with your view -- people should be free to pursue | the work they personally find the most fulfilling, rather than | the most profitable. | CountDrewku wrote: | >The "work" in antiwork is usually referring to paid | employment, | | Except it's not, the posts also reflect this. | | "A subreddit for those who want to end work, are curious | about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free | life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want | personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles." | ravedave5 wrote: | "People need work to feel fulfilled." I never thought I'd see | Stockholm syndrome in the wild. | lezojeda wrote: | Are you kidnapped or held against your will by your employer? | ravedave5 wrote: | Are you able to keep a shelter over your head and food in | your belly without work? | CountDrewku wrote: | Huh? Are you expecting others to take care of your needs | while you do nothing? | | At what time in history has this ever been an option. You | would be dead in a ditch with this attitude for most of | our history. Maybe you need to go out into the woods and | survive without help to force an attitude change. | | You have a skewed since of reality egged on by a society | that's let you survive off of doing basically nothing and | yet you still complain. The problem here is that you | believe all of the stuff to keep you alive just magically | appears without anyone doing any work. | zero102 wrote: | They do. You do, I do, everyone does. | | You're maliciously interpreting OP to imply that "slaving | over a hot keyboard" is the only way to feel fulfilled. | | Whether you are an employee, company owner, gardener, | woodworker, whatever you are being fulfilled by "working". | Applying yourself willfully and deliberately to a problem. If | you are not being fulfilled you find something else. Or, like | most people, you realize _working for someone_ won 't be | fulfilling, so you instead seek fulfillment in _work_ that | you enjoy - such as your hobbies. | | This equating of _employment_ with _slavery_ by the | /r/antiwork types is why the subreddit is quickly becoming | the butt of every joke. Yes, it's not uncommon your | _profession_ is unfulfilling. Most well adjusted people | derive fulfillment from _work_ outside of their profession. | antihero wrote: | How is working a job that you know is completely mind-numbing | and pointless to enrich some other person meaningful in any | way? | CountDrewku wrote: | Reading comprehension. You neglected to pay attention to most | of my comment. | | Who is forcing you work a mind-numbing job? | | Do you want everyone else to pay for you to do nothing? Do | what you want, but don't expect others to donate what they've | earned to your finger painting or whatever it is you think | you should do to be fulfilled daily. This idea that everyone | will just suddenly become creative happy geniuses as soon as | "mind-numbing" work is alleviated is false. | [deleted] | TedShiller wrote: | I know friends who work at (Big Tech Company) who literally make | $500k/year on paper and they don't do anything. | mikewarot wrote: | I didn't automate my job, I just did a good enough job that | things stopped breaking, and I had less and less to every day. | Eventually I'd just show up, make rounds, wait for things to | break, make rounds again after lunch, wait until quitting time. | | I did try to improve the office productivity as a whole a few | times by patching up the wonky database they used for accounting, | but got shut down each time because of fear of change. | | So, in the end I was being paid to show up, mostly. I lived in | constant fear of getting fired, and in the end the job was | outsourced out of existence. Good on them, bad for me. | | That job slowly crushed my soul. I haven't recovered, a decade | later. | amznbyebyebye wrote: | Wishing you healing Mike. I'm burned out myself at my current | job and not sure if I'll ever get that excitement or passion | back in my life. | geocrasher wrote: | I watched a similar thing happen once. A greybeard was brought | in to whip things into shape. He did so. Automated everything | and made 100+ linux boxes run like a top. New owners came in, | and they weren't the nice kind. He got stressed out and had a | heart attack and was gone for several weeks. Things hummed | along while he was gone, and his perceived value went down | because things "ran just fine without him", ignoring that it | was _because_ of him. | | They ended up firing him and giving me his responsibilities, | which was a laugh because he and I had drastically different | jobs, and he was far more experienced and capable in system | administration and automation than I was. I too left less than | a year later. | trilinearnz wrote: | That's a very sad story. I hope he's doing well now, if he's | still around. | Taylor_OD wrote: | I had a similar job. Probably 1 hour of real work per day. It | was awesome at first. Quickly I started to hate it. I spend all | day dicking around so when I went home I had already done all | of my hobbies. I imagine that if I had that job now instead of | in my early 20's I would be able to fill that time with more | interesting things and/or family time. But I left that job | because I feared I was losing any skills I had and eventually | the gig would be up and I'd be forced to scramble to find | another job. | | These types of gigs are often a blessing and a curse. | themodelplumber wrote: | Ah, I can relate to that story. It reminded me of a position | I held many years ago. | | Realizing what a breeze the actual work was, I made the | mistake of asking permission to run a side gig, only | realizing later, after being told "no", that everyone else | there already had a side gig going, including everyone up my | leadership chain. | | There were a bunch of different phases during my time there | that were pretty funny though, like the "OK fine I'll slack | off" phase, the "make every new and interesting hobby | relevant to a work project so that I can do it at work" | phase, the "nah let's locate and polish every turd in the | office" phase (every line of the world's most boring HTML | documentation passed W3C validation after that), the | "exploring office gossip in encrypted chat with IT guy" | phase, the "working my way through Project Gutenberg" phase, | and the "excited to try everyone else's favorite lunch spot" | phase. | | I left for similar reasons, the future was coming and it | seemed brighter in almost any other position. The skills I | decided to develop were useful later, but it was a net | negative for me. | yibg wrote: | I have a some what similar stint. Worked at a start that got | acquired by big co for the product and customers, although not | the product my team was responsible for. Our product got | quickly put on maintenance mode with promises to rewrite the | whole thing at some point. | | So by that point I had been working there for a year and some, | knew the system pretty well and we had pretty much nothing to | do. No new features, very few bugs due to little change in the | product. | | I'd show up to work at 10, leave for lunch for 2+ hours, and | leave the office at 4. And even then I was mostly surfing the | web and chatting with friends most of the day. The rest of the | team and my manager knew, but they also knew there was actually | no work. We'd all go play badminton before lunch some times and | so there were 3 hours periods where no one was around. | | Was pretty nice at first. Steady pay, no responsibilities or | stress. But quickly got really boring. And since it was my | first job out of school, not very good for learning and growth. | Ironically the slow pace also really dampened by motivation to | look for another job, so I hung around probably a year longer | than I should have. | dansiemens wrote: | > I did try to improve the office productivity as a whole a few | times by patching up the wonky database they used for | accounting, but got shut down each time because of fear of | change | | I too have found that accounting is where new ideas go to die. | They don't really understand the technology that their jobs are | bound to, so any increase in perceived complexity is just a no- | go. | thatguy0900 wrote: | Well, alternatively, the guy who streamlined his job got | fired so someone else can do it cheaper. Accounting managers | will not thank them for making their job easier with better | tech, they will say oh that's easier than I thought it was, | let me get someone else to do it for less. They have no | incentives to accept better tech, in fact their incentive is | to make it worse so they cant be easily replaced. | mediaman wrote: | Agreed - accountants are a unique breed. They do a fair | amount of basic numeric analysis and rote work that is of the | sort that is beneficial to automation. But they're often very | averse to technology, often stop learning any new tools early | on in their career, and tend to stick to the methods they | learned as juniors, even many years later. | | That's a broad brush, and is certainly unfair to and untrue | of some accountants. Some are Excel gods and can VBA it up | with the best of them, and would have been productive | software engineers in another life. But it's surprisingly | true for much of the profession. | baby-yoda wrote: | at an internship in college (large consumer electronics company) | one of my daily tasks was to take an export from the ERP system, | format it in a specific way, save it to a shared drive and email | to a few different people. it was really repetitive, fairly | simplistic and the report from the ERP was very consistent. | | after about 2 weeks of doing this every day i thought there had | to be a way to automate it, so I did. i set the ERP report to be | emailed to me, set an email rule to save attachment to desktop | with a naming convention (from the specific sender), then my | excel macro would identify the current date's file and run | roughly 30 min after the report's usual sending time and format | it as required, then send to an email list. | | this was supposed to be the first hour to hour and a half of my | day. once i was confident it worked, i let it rip and enjoyed | hour and a half breakfast every morning, or roamed the office | talking to other interns, etc. | | a couple months later i mentioned to my manager that maybe | automate it and save some time but they had no interest and | brushed my comment off. so i kept enjoying my breakfast and free | time for the rest of my time there. | | my "automation" wasn't complicated at all, just took some | creative thinking and a bunch of attempts to get it right. | sometimes people either a) simply dont want to believe things can | be automated because it "devalues" what they do or have done in | the past, or b) are happy having tasks like this assigned to | underlings so they "know" and can easily explain what that person | is doing at any given time. | hinkley wrote: | We had a team that we were making look bad, and their solution | to this problem was to complain about every procedure we | weren't following exactly. | | One of the ones I was more sympathetic to was developer docs. | We had docs, but not where and in the official file format as | required. After dorking around with jcite for a couple weeks I | was able to clean up our integration tests enough to work as | examples for the docs, and the rest was just rearranging wiki | pages into a different set of files. | | By the time I was done, I had an almost compliant version of | the doc that took our tech writer one hour per release to fix | up the company footers and some formatting issues. The rest was | handled by a CI/CD job. | jcpham2 wrote: | FWIW I read this awhile ago or some version of it but I have | absolutely automated a job or an entire department's job away | with scripts. | | Think debt collection and EDI file transfers daily to | Equifax/Transunion and parsing the response files for skip | tracing. People got paid to drag and drop files in an FTP client | and my first inclination was to script it. | | I've been wary of what I automate ever since. | y-c-o-m-b wrote: | Except you just told the whole world and just like the fools that | are bragging about their "overwork" on reddit, they're doing so | against their own interests. These kinds of things end up on the | front page of the BBC under the "work life" section which your | boss may inevitably see, then get a wild idea that his/her | employees must be doing the same, and start a crusade to end it. | Pro tip: if something is meant to be kept a secret, don't spread | it online. This goes for job automation, multiple jobs, favorite | camping spots, etc. | throwawayboise wrote: | Assuming for the moment that this is a true story, IMO if the | person is "clocking in" and getting paid by the hour, then this | is dishonest and perhaps criminal. | | If the person is paid a salary then it's fine. Salaried employees | are paid to get a job done, not for their time. | jedberg wrote: | A lot of people in this thread find the story unbelievable. | Having done IT consulting for law firms, I absolutely believe | this story. | | IT for law is 30 years behind in some cases. They still use | Wordperfect because that's what all the templates are written in. | Most lawyers have no clue about IT and are happy to pay people to | keep things running. Most likely the law firm wouldn't even care | if OP told them what they were doing as long as it worked. | | Also, I know someone who was in a similar situation. He was a VAX | admin in the 90s, when that tech was already 20 years old. He | worked for a trading firm and all of their software was built on | VAX. They made $1M a day from their software, as long as the | machine was up during trading hours. | | His only job was to sit at the terminal one hour before trading | hours until trading closed for the day, and make sure the machine | is running, and perform maintenance after the trading day ended. | He got what in today's dollars would be about $500K a year to | basically just sit there and teach himself modern programming | languages while he waited for trading to end. | | His boss was well aware of this, and straight up told him, as | long as that machine is running during trading hours, the money | we pay you is more than worth it. It was literally 1/2 a day's | profits. | pcurve wrote: | $90k/year he/she is getting paid is so little money to a law firm | that they wouldn't care anyway if they found out. | _pmf_ wrote: | > For a while I felt guilty, like I was ripping the law-firm off | | Laughed out loud at this. | trembonator wrote: ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-19 23:01 UTC)