[HN Gopher] The mystery of social behavior in octopuses ___________________________________________________________________ The mystery of social behavior in octopuses Author : sohkamyung Score : 54 points Date : 2022-01-19 05:52 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (hakaimagazine.com) (TXT) w3m dump (hakaimagazine.com) | uninstantiated wrote: | When humans are social with humans, are they reaching out or | simply reacting? | dang wrote: | I changed the title from "Can We Really Be Friends with an | Octopus?" to "When octopuses are social with humans, are they | reaching out or simply reacting?" (the subtitle, more or less) | in the hope of avoiding shallow comments like this. (A comment | reacting purely to information, or lack of information, in a | title is pretty much shallow by definition.) | | Since that didn't work, I guess it's time to look for some more | representative phrase from the article text. | | Edit: ok, I've combined two phrases from the article to try to | that. Commenters: please discuss the actual material now. | austinjp wrote: | I agree with sibling comment; parent comment may be terse, | but I didn't find it shallow. | wombatmobile wrote: | ... in the hope of avoiding shallow comments like this. | | Shallow? It's profound. | | Have you tried to respond to the question, in the human | context? | dang wrote: | A shallow comment can contain a profound question. "What is | the meaning of life?" would be an even shallower comment. | | Were a comment to contain new and interesting information | about a profound, i.e. generic, question, that would be | fine. But this is precisely what internet comments bringing | up generic questions don't usually do. It's not a good fit | for the genre. Someone who really has something original to | say about a profound question would be better off writing | an essay, or a book. Certainly not a one-liner to an | internet forum. | | This is so much the case, in fact, that changing the | subject from a concrete topic to a more generic one is a | frequent form of trolling. | | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&qu | e... | wombatmobile wrote: | In this case, the question is informative and stimulating | because it challenges the assumption that human | interaction has a different dynamic to animal | interaction. | | Bringing this question to conscious awareness is a | different category of social discourse to "What is the | meaning of life", which is not really a social question | at all. | np1810 wrote: | > When humans are social with humans, are they reaching out or | simply reacting? | | Haha... I think it depends on the current situation of the | human is in... Sometimes human just wants to have a meaningful | conversation, sometimes just reacting aptly to prevent social | awkwardness or being tagged rude... | vanusa wrote: | I'd say ask the Octopi first. | | Wait, can't do that? But you were about to do it _anyway_? | | That's why you can't be friends. | michael1999 wrote: | Seems like Kooistra asked in the obvious polite way -- sit down | (i.e. render oneself less mobile) at a non-threatening range | and let them choose to approach or not. Is that not consent? | dang wrote: | " _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something._" | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | willis936 wrote: | Not all communication is verbal. | | You can't be [friends in the same way you are friends with | humans] an octopus because they are not human. I'm friends with | my cat. We have a mutual social relationship and he doesn't | speak a lick of English. | glxxyz wrote: | I like to think I'm friends with my cat but in my heart I | know I'm a combination of a roommate and staff. | asxd wrote: | It is pretty amazing the extent of understanding you can | achieve with an animal. After a year or so raising my pup, it | _feels_ like we have both picked up certain signals to | communicate. He paws at me and then sits by the front door | when he needs to go to the bathroom, for instance (although | sometimes he cleverly abuses this because he just wants to go | outside and play with me during worktime, but I can 't fault | him for that). I'm sure this is mundane for most people who | are dog owners, but being my first dog I couldn't help but be | impressed at the level of communication the little guy seems | to be capable of. | | I can't imagine they're the only animals capable of that. It | certainly feels like we're friends with a mutual | understanding. | GuB-42 wrote: | Dogs are the champions of human communication. They are the | first domesticated specie, not only they were predisposed | to it, being pack animals. But they also had 15000 years of | evolution to perfect it. Cats are not to the same level as | dogs but they are still very competent domesticated | animals. | | Octopuses, by comparison, are aliens. In fact, someone said | that if we want to have an idea of what alien intelligence | could look like, look at octopuses. They are intelligent in | a very non-human way. | V-2 wrote: | Dogs have lived alongside humans for millennia. They're | genetically engineered animals (in the oldschool way - by | breeding and selection, not in a test tube). And we've bred | them largely by rewarding their ability to interact with | us. Dogs are obviously quite artificial species in that | sense | technothrasher wrote: | Having grown up with a lot of domesticated animals, it's | amazing how much dogs can communicate on our terms, | compared to, say, a horse. Horses can communicate quite a | bit, but you typically have to understand horses and meet | them where they're at before you can effectivity | communicate with them. Dogs do a much better job of | trying different ways to get their point across to you | until you get it. | willis936 wrote: | A recent popular example of a horse communicating in | their own way. | | https://youtu.be/KCzwyFHSMdY | asxd wrote: | > to get their point across | | I love this phrasing, as I think it sums up the | difference between dogs and other animals with regards to | human communication. It's possible to communicate with | other animals if you put in the effort, but dogs on the | other hand are often willing to put in the effort to | communicate with _you_! | asxd wrote: | That's a good point. They've definitely been bred for | their ability to communicate with us. I know it's a bit | tangential, but I do like the fact we have a kind of | sister species in that way. I sometimes wonder what it | would be like if our ancestors had instead domesticated | another animal to that extent (besides the cat, I | suppose). In an alternate universe, maybe we'd have | smallish bears as trusted companions :-) | hutzlibu wrote: | "In an alternate universe, maybe we'd have smallish bears | as trusted companions :-)" | | Some people have even in this universe, but not so many, | because they are not easy to handle. And back then having | pets, was not so much a hobby - but the dogs were useful | for survival. (guarding and hunting) | asxd wrote: | I would imagine wolves weren't to easy domesticate either | hutzlibu wrote: | Not easy, but much more easy, because wolves are pack | animals who accept a leader, which can be a human. | | Bears not so much and therefore much harder to control. | Same with cats, which is why they have been kept around | to hunt the mice and rats - but only small cats. | | Also I believe the first dogs did not came from wolves, | but other wild dog breeds. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | > he doesn't speak a _lick_ of English | | Nicely done. | endofreach wrote: | You should read about experiments where they gave MDMA to | octopus who are usually very unsocial... spoiler: it has an | effect. They are fascinating animals. | | They are highly intelligent, but have one big problem: their | max. life expectation is about 5 years. Usually the mother | dies at birth and they grow up alone from an early age, hence | no social development (even to a degree where they are very | hostile to other octopus). | | So they have not a way of building culture like humans, like | thr passing on knowledge to the younger generations. Though | they kind of have 8 brains. | | If they didn't have these problems, we might be talking | differently about them. | | One day I will open a training area with octopus & invest | millions in trying to extend life expectancy & social | behaviour of octopuses and train them to take over the world. | Fezzik wrote: | So you can't be friends with mute people or people you do not | share a language with? There are far more telling ways to | determine friendship than someone saying 'yes, let's be | friends'. Even between those who do speak the same language. | gebruikersnaam wrote: | A nice book about octopuses: Other Minds by Peter Godfrey-Smith | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28116739 | james-redwood wrote: | Octopi are remarkably intelligent creatures, as any good aquarium | owner will tell you. | datameta wrote: | An even better aquarium owner wouldn't have them at all. | | My Octopus Teacher is a fantastic look into the life of an | octopus, their intellectual capacity, and their propensity to | interact with humans. | suifbwish wrote: | Why would that be better to not have them? It sounds a bit | presumptive of a universal morality rather than a logical | statement. | gorgabal wrote: | It sounds like a moral statement because it is a moral | statement. Nothing wrong with that IMHO . | procinct wrote: | Octopuses are known to not live very long in captivity. | girvo wrote: | Though they also don't live long in the wild either. | Fascinating creatures. | ceejayoz wrote: | It's not an insane idea that octopuses might not enjoy | being stuffed into what amounts to a studio apartment for | their entire life. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | They are also notorious for finding increasingly cleverer | ways of escaping aquariums. Which again adds to the case | that an aquarium is not a suitable environment. | girvo wrote: | For my purposes, because their short lifespan and | particular needs make them pretty bad pets IMO. Never mind | the moral arguments for keeping such intelligent animals in | captivity. | coldtea wrote: | > _It sounds a bit presumptive of a universal morality | rather than a logical statement._ | | Logical statements just by themselves are for Logicians | and/or theorem provers. | | But they're also useless by themselves (just an axiomatic | rule sustitution game). | | To have any value in human life they are combined with | utility functions, morality, and other such things. | jjtheblunt wrote: | (waiting for the recurring comments, that 2 x octopus -> | octopodes or octopuses but not octopi since it's not latin 2nd | declension, but rather misspelled greek) | amelius wrote: | Octopus is already wrong in itself. | colechristensen wrote: | Let's not encourage the unnecessary language pedantry. | totalZero wrote: | Pedantry is no felony when discussing an eight-armed | genius. | | I personally settle for nothing less than "octopodes," with | the accent on the second of its four syllables. | OJFord wrote: | I think 'octopodes' should be considered incorrect on the | basis that the vast majority of even the people using it are | probably not pronouncing it correctly. | mc32 wrote: | Eh, as long as it rhymes with 'tetrapods', it's accepted | and current pronunciation. | dragonwriter wrote: | Doesn't it actually come into English from Latin (in its | later academic/international use, rather than the classical | language)? | | But in any case, it's _English_ , not Latin or misspelled | Greek, and octopi seems to at least be the oldest evident | English plural of octopus, AFAIK, though octopuses seems to | be experiencing current popularity, and octopodes is | just...no, though the suggestion once made that English ought | to adopt _octopods_ , wasn't bad, but never caught on. | joe_the_user wrote: | Does "When octopuses are social with humans, are they reaching | out or simply reacting?" really have a meaning? Or is the | distinction meaningful to make? | | The octopus regarded the research as "safe" and "interesting". It | didn't integrate the researcher into octopus society because such | a thing doesn't exist. But octopuses had a society, would it have | to be more than a mutual regarding of a group as safe and | interesting? Especially, since many other complex behaviors can | be created from this start (just as the octopus created all sort | of interesting things in the world). | | _" Maybe octopuses don't regard us so much as friends or | associates as giant, elaborate levers they can manipulate for | their own benefit"_ | | Maybe the difference between these kinds of relationships is less | than we think. | zzzeek wrote: | this seems to be about the Netflix movie "My Octopus Teacher". | It's a great watch and certainly interesting whether or not you | think the octopus is bonding with the filmmaker. | neonate wrote: | The article is about much more than that movie. | gattr wrote: | There is a subplot about intelligence-enhanced cephalopods in | Stephen Baxter's SF novel "Manifold: Time". | troyvit wrote: | Gonna check it out! I'm almost done with the Children of Time | series, the second book of which also features intelligence- | enhanced cephalopods. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-20 23:00 UTC)