[HN Gopher] Intel's $20B Ohio factory could become world's large... ___________________________________________________________________ Intel's $20B Ohio factory could become world's largest chip plant Author : HieronymusBosch Score : 466 points Date : 2022-01-21 16:21 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.reuters.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.reuters.com) | neonate wrote: | https://archive.is/66jAS | nabla9 wrote: | One fab will use 12 high-NA EUV machines from ASML and their | price will be "well over $340 million". They will be spending | more than $4B per fab just for for ASML machines. | | https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/01/intel-says-ohio-... | benreesman wrote: | I'm for global competition as a force as much as the next | thinking person, but as an American who grew up on Intel chips it | sure would be nice to not get our asses kicked all over the field | for a change. The ASML stuff seems to indicate they might mean it | this time. | sanp wrote: | so, will Ohio be turning back to Blue in the next presidential | election? | 535188B17C93743 wrote: | Hopefully this keeps/brings in educated young folks and at | least dampens the shift to red. | supernova87a wrote: | Is it true that once such a plant is built, the number of skilled | workers to keep it running is actually relatively low? | | I.e. some operational "dev-ops" style engineers who can fix and | troubleshoot highly automated lines, keep the thing running. | People to supervise the systems, some workers to handle raw | materials, etc. and then the packaging on the output side. But in | general, quite sparse for a million square foot property, | compared to other industries occupying a building of that size? | | I wonder partly because the favorable tax / labor jurisdictions | aren't exactly where you tend to find extremely skilled silicon | engineers. But an operational plant is maybe not where those | folks are needed. | adamcstephens wrote: | They're touting this project as 3k permanent employees. | xyst wrote: | its a shame we didn't see this type of investment after the rust | belt area crashed in 2008. if we had more domestic chip plants, | we probably wouldn't be in the current chip shortage rn | | chip fab/manufacturing process probably doesn't generate as many | jobs as the auto industry (the process is automated heavily from | what I have seen) at its peak but at least they will be very high | paying. | gruez wrote: | >if we had more domestic chip plants, we probably wouldn't be | in the current chip shortage rn | | Why? At the end of the day it's a capacity shortage. The only | way to prevent that is to have surplus capacity prior to the | pandemic. Considering how companies don't like to spend money | on expensive fabs that end up getting underutilized, I'm | skeptical that having more domestic chip plants would lead to | that. | cxr wrote: | > The only way to prevent that is to have surplus capacity | prior to the pandemic. The only way to prevent that is to | have surplus capacity prior to the pandemic. | | "Capacity" in a fab means throughput. Contrary to the | breathlessness that I hear when people describe modern | semiconductor manufacturing, fabs are nowhere near optimal. | There's plenty of dumb shit that happens in an ordinary day | at a semiconductor fab--and consequently, lots of room for | (easy) improvements. Fabs have lower than optimal capacity | because they go heavy on hiring for things like a background | in physics and chemistry, or tangential degrees like | aerospace[1], but they don't treat IT concerns or the day-to- | day processes that workers are engaged in like engineering | problems. This gets you things like routine showstoppers that | take 20+ minutes to resolve because that's how long it takes | to go turn off the Caps Lock on a given workstation before | being able to resume work. _So much_ room for improvement. | | 1. and proficiency in Microsoft Office | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30021528 | markl42 wrote: | Why does intel want to buy $100B worth of potatoes? | keeganjw wrote: | Wow, it really takes an insane amount of money these days to make | a leading edge fab. I really hope they can pull this off and it | doesn't end up like Foxconn in Wisconsin... | tyleo wrote: | I was thinking that. Im a former Ohioan and most of my family | is still here. I have much more faith in Intel than in Foxconn. | My understanding is that Foxconn had a shoddy track record of | building out locations outside of their home country. | bushbaba wrote: | Foxconn is hard, repetitive manual labor. | | chip fab isn't nearly as bad of work. Americans don't want | crappy jobs which is why foxcon had issues. | beambot wrote: | "TSMC's Arizona Culture Clash" - | https://www.eetimes.com/tsmcs-arizona-culture-clash/ | | > Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) faces | challenges managing employees at its new fab in Arizona who | are unaccustomed to the long work hours and management | culture that in Taiwan have helped make the company the | world's largest chip foundry. | reducesuffering wrote: | Similarly, there's a Netflix movie by Obama's production | company called American Factory that dealt with the | culture clash of a Chinese glass factory in America: | https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/american_factory | nurspouse wrote: | Having worked at Intel, I can tell you that the process | side of Intel has similar work hours. This, in | particular, rings true for Intel: | | > Different positions may have different requirements, so | work hours vary, according to the principal engineer. "An | equipment engineer might start work at 8 o'clock in the | morning and leave around 9 o'clock at night, but is it | normal? This may happen two or three days a week. On a | production line, the equipment must be maintained. | | > "If you are a process engineer, it will be more stable. | Maybe you can start work at 8:30 a.m.and leave before | 7:30 p.m. If there are some urgent matters, you may have | to stay later." | | At Intel, process engineers had to attend a daily meeting | at 7:40am (mandatory), and would rarely leave before 6pm | (meetings scheduled at 5 or 6pm were common). I sometimes | would wander around in that part of the building at 7pm | and a significant fraction of cubicles would be filled. | | Almost all Intel process engineers have PhDs. | Aperocky wrote: | How much are Intel process engineers paid to withstand | that? | nurspouse wrote: | Good in terms of process engineers, poor compared to | FAANG SW Engineers. | nwiswell wrote: | Very well for Oregon. | | But it's a little more nuanced than pay for two reasons. | | 1) Intel is a little like proto-Amazon. There is a | preference for hiring people directly out of grad school | and inducting them into the cult while they are still | naive, so that's just what they come to expect for work- | life balance. | | 2) The whole semiconductor industry is like this, and | particularly so for production fabs. If you have domain | expertise, you have no alternative work-life balance | choice short of a career change. | nurspouse wrote: | > There is a preference for hiring people directly out of | grad school and inducting them into the cult while they | are still naive, so that's just what they come to expect | for work-life balance. | | Heh. I once interviewed for an internal SW position that | dealt with fab automation. I openly told them in the | interview that I knew about their work culture and that | was of great concern to me. | | Interviewer: I know what you mean, and I promise the org | has been working to improve the conditions. It's not as | bad as it was. | | Me: Great! However, for me the comparison isn't the "old | you" but the rest of Intel. | | <Back and forth> | | Interviewer: Look, you're not going to get a 40 hour/week | job anywhere in the SW industry! | | Me: Umm... All my SW engineer roles at Intel were 40 | hour/week jobs. I haven't worked on weekends in years. | <Proceed to list friends at big name SW companies who | also don't work more than 40 hours/week> | | Interviewer: OK. We normally interview people straight | out of college who don't know any better. | | Needless to say, I didn't take that job. | selimthegrim wrote: | When I was a green badge SWE at Intel all my (blue badge) | coworkers were 15-20 years older than me. No one my age | stuck around. | [deleted] | swagasaurus-rex wrote: | There are plenty of Americans who are okay with 60-80 hours | of even repetitive manual labor. I know a few who work for | shipping companies. | | What Americans don't want are jobs that pay less and don't | offer 1.5x overtime. Unlike shipping, foxconn jobs can be | done in a place with a cheaper cost of living. America | isn't competitive in low margin businesses because poor | people need to pay rent which is just higher in the US. | rotten wrote: | This same street has a Facebook data center, an AWS data center, | and a Google data center (within a couple of miles). There is a | biotech research campus, Bath & Bodyworks main research lab, and | the main operations center for AEP (a midwest electric company). | If you travel about 2-3 miles orthogonal to that street we have a | big data center for Nationwide Insurance, a campus for Discover | (credit cards), and a State Farm insurance facility. | | It is literally across street from one of the Ohio East-2 | availability zones. If they were making rack-mounted server | boards, they could just walk them across the street and plug them | into the cloud. | timr wrote: | Curious -- grew up near New Albany, but haven't been back in | years. What street is it? | MisterPea wrote: | Exactly what I was going to say. "Friends don't let friends use | us-east-1" - us-east-2 will be a huge spot for computing in the | coming decade. | 55873445216111 wrote: | Silicon fabs do not make server boards. They just produce the | silicon wafer i.e. "die" of a semiconductor device. Most die | must be assembled into a package before they can be used. The | die packaging aka "backend" is almost never done at the same | place as the fab. Most backend is in Taiwan or Malaysia or | China. Even after the die is packaged, it needs to be mounted | on a complete PCB with all the other components. Intel | typically does not do PCB assembly, they mostly just sell | assembled CPUs (or other devices) to other companies that do | the PCB assembly. | 42365767567 wrote: | i think it was a joke... | nebula8804 wrote: | I know there are PCB manufacturers somewhere in the US. I | don't know about packaging. Do you know which firms do | packaging of the dies and why can't the US do it(It can't | just be cost)? How hard can it be really? Its essentially | plastic , maybe some metal, and gold isn't it? Maybe an | argument could be made to locate at least one source of | manufacturing for all these steps in a local area. But thats | just the programmer in me wanting to optimize without | understanding the realities of manufacturing costs. | 55873445216111 wrote: | It's all about cost. The assembly and test is the "low | tech" part of semiconductor manufacturing and can be done | well in Asia by workforces that are not as highly educated | as those you need to run a fab. US and western economies | have always focused on doing the highest value add portions | of manufacturing domestically (where the highly educated | workforce is key) while outsourcing the lower value add | (lower margin) portions of the supply chain. | | Consumers demand low cost. Many times they just buy the | cheaper widget, because most people are not even capable of | distinguishing the differences in performance or quality | between two different widgets. But the difference in price | is obvious to everyone and so most people just use that. | The pressure of reducing every single penny out of the cost | or semiconductors is enormous. | | Top 10 OSAT (outsourced assembly and test) companies: | https://evertiq.com/news/51003 | chasd00 wrote: | > This same street has a Facebook data center, an AWS data | center, and a Google data center (within a couple of miles). | There is a biotech research campus, * _Bath & Bodyworks main | research lab*_, and the main operations center for AEP (a | midwest electric company). | | i bet it would be fun to chat and talk shop with engineers at | the bath and body works lab during a lunch. | sanchay wrote: | That's why I come to HN, would have been oblivious to the fact | otherwise | afandian wrote: | Me too, but I'm reasonably sure this is information I will | never use. | ensan wrote: | When it comes to proximity research institutions, the choice of | location is strange to me. Somewhere in the northern | Indiana/Illinois/Michigan (i.e. "Greater Michiana") would have | made a lot more sense. That way, you would be close to, | | UIUC, Northwestern, UChicago, UMichigan, Purdue, Notre Dame, | UIndiana, Argonne National Lab, etc. | rotten wrote: | The Ohio State University is in Columbus and if not the largest | university in the world it is in the top 3. | eatonphil wrote: | Largest university in the world? Top 3 in the US maybe but | the largest universities in the world (I'm not talking about | networks) are an order of magnitude bigger. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_universities | lenocinor wrote: | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_publi | c... Top 3 US, as you said, but nowhere near top 3 in the | world, as you also said. Also, enrollment sure isn't | everything. Speaking as someone who used to live near | Orlando, UCF is #2 on that list and I had consistent bad | luck hiring computer science grads from there. And 3 of the | top 5 are in Florida (it's been like that since 2015) and I | don't see tech employers scrambling to move to Florida en | masse. The focus and quality of the institution definitely | matters. | ensan wrote: | The number of enrolled students is not a good argument here. | randcraw wrote: | Yes, but OSU is not especially well known for computer | architecture. In comparison, Wisconsin, Michigan, and | Illinois are all top-5 schools in EE/hardware. And the | Champaign area is even more affordable than Columbus. So | choosing Columbus must have satisfied multiple constraints, | some of which aren't obvious. | erosenbe0 wrote: | Champaign doesn't have sufficient infrastructure (think | construction workers even) so they'd be looking at Chicago | suburbs. This would make Labor costs way too high. | Wisconsin would be a fantastic choice but Foxconn | boondoggle probably ruined that possibility. | eeeeeeehio wrote: | They needed to be close to a large city center. Chicago is too | expensive -- so the option you are proposing is something like | Indianapolis? | justin66 wrote: | > When it comes to proximity research institutions | | ...which has nothing to do with running a fab, if we're being | honest about it. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Do the people that need to work at the fabs come from those | schools? | datavirtue wrote: | No. It is unskilled labor save for the jobs that are not on | the shop floor. | ensan wrote: | For such a high-tech industry, the choice of location is also | about taking advantage of the talent and research ecosystem | that is already established there. | bee_rider wrote: | Good luck to them! Always nice to get as much semiconducter | talent in-country as possible, fabs are a pretty crucial supply | line after all. | | I'd imagine most people would want a pretty significant pay raise | to move to somewhere like Ohio, but they are nearby Ohio State | University, so maybe they'll get local talent. | tracerbulletx wrote: | Columbus is pretty nice tbh. | justin66 wrote: | > I'd imagine most people would want a pretty significant pay | raise to move to somewhere like Ohio | | Cost of living is low relative to the west coast and high | relative to a lot of places in Asia, so it really depends on | who you're talking about. | vmception wrote: | For now. | | I've travelled to enough cities that it is basically an | amusing part of my checklist to hear why Area Man is mad | about housing prices going up. | | I could procedurally generate possible scapegoats at this | point. | justin66 wrote: | The nice thing about where they've located that Intel site, | purely in terms of housing cost, is that you can get there | quickly from plenty of cheap small towns. I'd live in | Columbus if I worked there, but you could certainly go in | the other direction without too much of a commute. | TulliusCicero wrote: | Rent in Columbus appears to be roughly comparable to Tokyo: | https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of- | living/compare_cities.jsp?cou... | justin66 wrote: | Those numbers are incredible. One thing to keep in mind, | though, is that a lot of what we're talking about when we | say "Columbus" is suburbs. And the plant Intel is building | is even in a different county. | duxup wrote: | I also assumed tOSU and the Columbus area would be a draw. | | Having a big university in a more urban setting is very nice | (posting from the Twin Cities with the University of Minnesota | centrally located). | bee_rider wrote: | I bet some OSU grad students will get some nice stipends out | of this, too. Win/win. | baybal2 wrote: | Any salary in semi space in US is better than $34k-$40k per | year for a physics/engineering PhD level worker of moderate | experience in Taiwan. | | The bigger question is why none of these $34k a year PhDs did | move to USA before. I bet, even a floor sweeper at an Intel fab | gets more. | amelius wrote: | > I bet, even a floor sweeper at an Intel fab gets more. | | A floor sweeper delivering max 1 particle per m^2. | [deleted] | mensetmanusman wrote: | US visa policy is slow, apparently pew found there are | 700,000,000 people interested in immigrating to the US, open | the gates! | pradn wrote: | The US could issue special visas for workers in chip | fabrication fields, but that'll probably anger our ally | Taiwan. There's also top workers in South Korea and Japan, | other US allies. | erosenbe0 wrote: | Sure USA workers are probably better off but in USA there | would be 6k in deduction for Kaiser Healthcare family plan | plus up to 3k out of pocket; then there are the additional | dental costs; employee likely must own a car (no Taipei | transport); deal with potentially higher income, sales, and | property tax; much higher child-care cost; schools for | children in many areas may be of lower quality or more | expensive; the rate of gun crime, gun suicide, and drug use | is higher; etc etc | mNovak wrote: | Depending on where they're moving from, they might take a pay | cut.. Ohio is very cheap to live in. New Albany is not | particularly exciting, but nearby Columbus is a nice vibrant | city, not the end of the earth. OSU is a definitely good asset | for Intel, they put out 2k engineering degrees a year. | | I hope this spurs a nice tech ecosystem for Ohio--it's been | dominated by insurance and medicine for a long time. | 908B64B197 wrote: | > I'd imagine most people would want a pretty significant pay | raise to move to somewhere like Ohio | | Yeah. The region isn't known to attract or retain tech | talent. | | > Depending on where they're moving from, they might take a | pay cut.. Ohio is very cheap to live in | | The thing with Cost of Living is that the biggest expense is | typically housing. And if you bought the house, it means the | biggest expense is... building equity into an asset you can | sell afterward. | | Keep in mind the engineer who purchased a 2 million house in | Palo Alto can sell it for two million, and then move to Ohio | to a much cheaper house purchased in cash. The reverse isn't | true. | chasd00 wrote: | given that over the last 2 years we've all been trained to | live like hermits I wonder who is going to be bothered about | lack of city amenities? You can still jog around the block | and walk your dog but large public gatherings (big city | specialty) isn't much of a draw any more. | galdosdi wrote: | Nitpick: Small and medium, not just large public | gatherings, and a larger variety of them, are also a big | city draw. But one of the biggest big city draws is the | large variety of employment -- not just for you, but your | kids. You don't know what career they'll go into and | they're more likely to be able to do it while staying near | the metro area they grew up in if it's a large one with a | good large varied job market, as opposed to having to | choose between career and staying near family. Obviously | remote/hybrid work makes that a little easier, but a lot of | stuff still has to be done on site, it's still a | competitive advantage to be able to choose between local | AND remote jobs as opposed to ONLY remote jobs because your | hometown is so small, and hybrid doesn't really make metro | areas irrelevant, it merely expands their size, much as | highways and commuter trains once did 50 and 100 or so | years ago. | abletonlive wrote: | sounds like you're living in a bubble. people in NYC are | out and about socializing. not living like a hermit. | there's like 50 dance events every weekend. | asdff wrote: | Local businesses and restaurants, especially having a lot | of variety and choice for each, are big draws for big | cities. I'd thought about moving to suburbia for a larger | property but I'd really have nothing to do all day beyond | peter around my larger house. I wouldn't be able to walk to | all the things I walk to from my place now, from businesses | and stores but also hiking and parks, and especially | informal city stuff like the people selling tacos or fruit | on the sidewalk. I would miss out on a lot of hobbies I | engage in that wouldn't be well supported in an area with a | smaller population. Tons of little services I rely on only | really work at scale with a big city population, both from | private companies and services offered by the city itself | (like the free compost program I exploit heavily). | | This is all stuff I've been doing or using constantly even | with the pandemic. Some stuff like taking advantage of | public amenities like hiking trails have become an even | stronger habit of mine, thanks to the pandemic. I'm one to | opt to walk to the local store, feel a product in my hands | and decide to buy it, vs ordering from Amazon, something | you can only do if you live somewhere dense enough to | sustain these local stores. Even getting an uber to come | out to a Columbus suburb is going to be a process; they are | probably going to just deny your ride if you aren't doing | an easy couple mile bar hop around OSU or the Short | North/downtown area or going to the airport. | taylortrusty wrote: | This may be true for you but come to any major city and | there are large events every single night. It's back to | pre-covid. Every bar in NYC is packed, concerts are back. I | went to see 4 shows last weekend. | [deleted] | JaimeThompson wrote: | I have been told, but can't verify, that Intel was looking at | placing this in Texas but that the power grid issues ruled that | out. Can anyone confirm? | smashem wrote: | Excellent. Hope it works out long-term. | devwastaken wrote: | I don't know of anyone whom would want to move to Ohio for such a | job. No point in making big dollars for complicated work when | where you live is... _Ohio_. The state anyone in tech desperately | tries to leave. | | By trying to go for maximum welfare they're shooting themselves | in the foot. There's a balance, saving 10bn means nothing if your | company can't get the right people. Intel's problem is they had | the wrong people. | thoughtpalette wrote: | Growing up in Michigan and moving to Chicago (12 years), I sort | of felt the same. Recently visited Cincinnati though and it was | kind of amazing. Little town in a "valley", Nice river front, | people and shops were nice. Good downtown feeling. Would def | consider it a low cost of living place on my radar now. | BeetleB wrote: | I'm guessing you've never been to Columbus and have little idea | on what it's like there. | | Plenty of people go to top schools in that part of the country | for their PhD. If they're willing to spend 5-7 years doing | that, I can see them willing to work there. | | Also, if people moved to the middle of nowhere in New York to | work for GF, or Burlington, VT - I think they'll be OK with | Columbus. | MathYouF wrote: | I was born and partially raised in Columbus and Ohio in | general. I defintiely left for the coast as soon as I could | get a job that allowed it. So there's at least certain people | they're describing the motivations of correctly. | | That said, there are many who are happy to live there. I do | wonder how many young and truly brilliant engineers are on | that list, but maybe their presence won't be required on | site? It's not an exciting place to be young and dynamic when | compared to the big cities on the coasts. | | The quality of life though, especially for someone raising a | family and looking to build their nest egg, is great. Fresh | air, relatively low crime, nice large yards and people with | good Midwestern family values (might not be the "values" | someone from San Fransisco would prioritize though). | ianceicys wrote: | I don't know where you get the idea "anyone in tech desperately | tries to leave." I'm on the East Coast currently, but I'd love | to move to Ohio. Cost of Living / Work-Life Integration is | pretty compelling from several friends I've had who have moved | to the Columbus area from Cali in the past 3-4 years for senior | tech positions. | | When 150k achieves a 400k lifestyle from Cali...and you start | having a family..it's hard to not to at least pronder the idea. | | This will be good for the midwest, for intel, and for the | United States. | nmitchko wrote: | You might be underestimating the number of people who would | return to the workforce for jobs like this. | et15 wrote: | There are definitely downsides to Ohio - namely, political- and | weather-related. However, Columbus is a pretty big tech city | with a lot of startups, VC money flowing, and a student | pipeline from OSU. | steve76 wrote: | systems_glitch wrote: | Dayton Hamfest. | bufbupa wrote: | Careful, I think your biases are showing. To assert that nobody | wants to live in Ohio is an incredibly myopic worldview. I can | think of loads of people that would love to work in tech | without the big city living, or the high prices that come with | it. | brewdad wrote: | Ohio is the 7th largest state by population and 10th in | population density. It's also continuing to grow in population, | especially around Columbus, unlike some other Rust Belt states. | Whether they "want to" or not, LOTS of people live in Ohio and | Columbus is arguably it's most vibrant city thanks to being the | capital and home of its flagship university. | | I'm a UMich grad, so am not allowed to live in Ohio, but I can | see its appeal for some. | theandrewbailey wrote: | > I'm a UMich grad, so am not allowed to live in Ohio, but I | can see its appeal for some. | | You'll get looks if people know you're an alum from that | school up north, but you should be OK. | | Beat Michigan! | | For those not in the know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mich | igan%E2%80%93Ohio_State_fo... | | https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=OSU+cross+out+M&iax=images&. | .. | rayusher wrote: | For a single person yes but if you have family Ohio is a nice | place to live. That's why Dave Chappelle's decided to live out | there. | micromacrofoot wrote: | Dave Chappelle lives on a 60 acre farm... that's a nice place | to live in any state | belval wrote: | This is a bit of a weird take to me. I don't know anything | about Ohio (maybe it's a shit hole) but large investment will | raise the living standards. California is beautiful, diverse | and whatnot, but it's not like there is something in the air | that makes it that way. The influx of people and capital is | what makes it special. Same for NY and most higher density | areas. | vavooom wrote: | "largest investment in Ohio's history" "the largest semiconductor | manufacturing location on the planet" | | What is it that makes Ohio such a key and ideal place for such a | massive investment? I assume there must be an abundance of energy | + work force + land available that makes this possible, as well | as a foundation built up by the Rust Belt. | | Could the Rust Belt go Silicon? | blihp wrote: | Tax breaks + cheap land + low cost local labor + business | friendly local government + good PR. Geographically it's | reasonably centrally located from a transportation standpoint | to the rest of the U.S. and has access to lots of water. | jaystraw wrote: | New Albany seems situated nicely for domestic distribution, and | also European distribution as it's about 150 miles from | Cleaveland. Maybe there's another port it's closer to, I don't | know much about Ohio. But if Intel can get chips to Europe more | quickly than its Asian rivals, I can see that being a boon for | them. | justin66 wrote: | The site where they are building is half an hour away from an | international airport, Columbus is a shipping hub, and it's | tied in well with the interstate highway system. With all due | respect to the Port of Cleveland, which is mostly focused on | raw materials and heavy machinery as far as I can tell, that | stuff is probably more of a factor. | thehappypm wrote: | Ohio has a good mix. It's in a low cost of living area with a | business friendly climate, being economically depressed, Intel | gets lots of perks. Workforce is cheaper than elsewhere due to | lower COL. There's lots of water nearby. And, there's the | potential for talent with the many universities in the area. | titzer wrote: | That and incredible tax breaks. | | I'm originally from neighboring Indiana. The midwest should | have figured this out long ago, but political corruption, the | coal lobby, and a lack of imagination has really blinkered the | long-term planning there. | vgeek wrote: | New Albany has _a lot_ of corporate headquarters relative to | the size of the city, even when you exclude the Les Wexner | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Wexner) companies. Big | Lots, Red Roof Inn and Bob Evans are the most prominent, but | there are lots of other major companies with measurable | presence (one of the two AWS US-EAST-2 DCs & a FB DC), too. | From looking at the town's operating plan, The New Albany | Company (a planned community, where Wexner & friends have/can | buy up all of the swampy farmland they want and grow the city | limits as necessary) already have lots of land (both for C&I | and residential) and can offer tax breaks/rebates that can't | be matched for corporations, instead relying more on the | taxes from the residential developments of $500k+ homes | (probably 1.5-2x MSA median) in the area (if you want to see | a gerrymandered map, look up New Albany-- it is very | deliberate in excluding multi-family developments from the | city limits). | encryptluks2 wrote: | While I think that chipset factories require some valuable tech | skills, much of the work is factory-based skilled labor work | that is usually low to middle-class income. Ohio is probably | ideal for this work because they have had a lot of factory | closures where cost-of-living is a lot cheaper than West coast, | and $35-40k per annum is considered good income to a lot of | people there. | alsaaro wrote: | It's land. | | This plant is being built in a rural community right outside of | Columbus. | dqpb wrote: | Finally. | jet777 wrote: | I so wish they would've picked Cleveland over Columbus | justin66 wrote: | I assume the deal with Intel was negotiated by the state | government and so Cleveland was never in the running, but it | must be said, the City of Cleveland has traditionally had a | knack for repelling businesses that are interested in making | big moves into the city. Progressive and Eaton both wanted to | be headquartered downtown, instead of out in the burbs. | | An Intel fab in the City of Cleveland proper is something to | contemplate, but I doubt very much that it was ever a | possibility. You'd probably want to locate such a thing further | out in the county. | 11thEarlOfMar wrote: | Bigger than these 5 monstrosities? | | http://shorturl.at/yHLW2 | mungoman2 wrote: | How do the economics work here? Intel's market cap is $215B. | mNovak wrote: | Lots of long term debt, like any other capital project. The | $100B number is purely speculative, if the project grows over | 50 years; they can build the first functional fab for $10B. | foobiekr wrote: | Intel is fabulously profitable and throws off $12B a year of | free cash flow, most of these projects take 5-10Y. That's | $60-120B investment without borrowing, which - well, capital is | cheap at the moment. | selectodude wrote: | The market cap of Intel is so low because their cost of growth | is so expensive. | gok wrote: | Debt | jimbob45 wrote: | Gratuitous subsidies from the US government. | | Also this is a great move in my eyes. Intel's HQ is on the West | Coast and I imagine that they lose out on at least some portion | of East Coast talent as a result. Hopefully this allows them to | have the best of both worlds. | dsr_ wrote: | Design work doesn't need to be done close to the fab. Intel | seems to be effectively splitting into two companies -- a fab | company and a design company. | | I don't think there are two worlds, either, unless you think | that LA, SF and Seattle also constitute worlds unto | themselves. | onepointsixC wrote: | The US gov is seriously _under investing_ compared to it 's | peers. South Korea is spending nearly 9 times more with their | $450Bn pledged gov investment into Semiconductors[0] compared | to America's investment of $52Bn with the CHIPS Act[1] | | [0]: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Tech/Semiconductors/Sou | th-K... [1]: | https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/01/14/heres-what- | yo... | [deleted] | vgeek wrote: | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1032019.Bad_Samaritans | | This is a good book that goes through how economies develop | and the role of State Owned/sponsored Enterprises are | helpful in developing a nation's technology competencies. | The author uses South Korea as a few of his examples, too. | dsr_ wrote: | If you spend $6 billion a year for 15 years, that's $90 billion | which is almost the same as $100 billion. Even better is if you | spend less than that but attribute other costs to it over the | years, so that you get lots of tax breaks for bringing jobs to | the area. | burkaman wrote: | Well, it's a $20 billion investment that "could grow to $100 | billion". And either way it's going to be spread out over | several years. | asimpletune wrote: | The initial investment is only 20B, and spending that money | won't hurt their market cap because it's shifting money into | new assets, which would be considered part of their valuation. | ineedasername wrote: | With all of this recent chip investment, would anyone with more | familiarity with the industry care to comment about how much this | is driven by: | | 1) pre-existing long term plans | | 2) more recent supply chain bottlenecks | | 3) Some combination of 1 & 2 | | Bonus: How China may figure into the equation | Shadonototra wrote: | Thanks to communism! fully funded by the state! | | As for the location, guess we'll have chip shortage during the | winter | tommydoesntknow wrote: | Taylor_OD wrote: | "Up to $100B". Okay. I planned on spending up to $100B for my | wife's Christmas present. I actually ended up spending $75 + tax. | tyrfing wrote: | It's 20B with expansion options on 2,000 acres. Leading edge | fabs just cost an incredible amount of money, it's basically in | chunks of 10B at a time. | | Here's the Time article: https://time.com/6140476/intel- | building-factory-ohio/ | [deleted] | jeremyjh wrote: | The initial investment is $20B according to the article. | sidlls wrote: | This isn't very charitable. When companies publish this sort of | thing they're generally committed (however tentatively) to | within some reasonable percentage of the amount. Provided of | course it makes financial sense after further diligence and the | like. | shoyer wrote: | Foxconn once said it would spend $10B building a factory in | Wisconsin. Now the claim is $672M -- over next six years: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn_in_Wisconsin | | We'll believe it when it happens. | sidlls wrote: | Anyone who believes anything said by a company from that | region with respect to investments in the western world was | always in for a surprise. It's best to assume they think | we're all fat, dumb, lazy, and easily duped, and assume | they'll act accordingly. | Aperocky wrote: | It's a race to the bottom, once an unspoken rule has been | broken it will stay that way forever. | munificent wrote: | I don't think you can generalize between these deals when: | | 1. The semiconductor companies on one side of the table are | very different: Taiwanese company mostly employing in China | versus a US company. National cultures around commitments | and deals vary. | | 2. The politicians on the other side of the table are very | different. Scott Walker and Donald Trump with the Wisconsin | deal and Mike DeWine in Ohio. | katbyte wrote: | Not sure Foxconn va intel is a great comparison. | micromacrofoot wrote: | I wonder if big workforce investments like this in states like | Ohio and Texas will eventually impact political leanings in the | immediate area... will be interesting to see if anything's | changed 10 years in | hardolaf wrote: | These are mostly blue-collar/striped-blue-and-white-collar | jobs. So no, not really. Fabs are also giant ecological | disasters. I wouldn't be surprised if Columbus was chosen over | Cleveland because the different rules the Ohio EPA has based on | localized pollution. | ericmay wrote: | Really disappointed in many of the negative and insecure comments | coming from members of this community saying "Ohio sucks" or | "Ohio State University sucks because it's not Stanford" or "how | many startups does Ohio have". It really reflects poorly on those | making these comments and I can't help but think seeing a state | not on the east or west coast being selected is causing fear and | uncertainty in the lives of those who wrap up their personality | in being in California or something. | | People in Ohio are excited about this and all of the negativity, | frankly, is just unwelcome. | thanatos519 wrote: | Oddly, my mental autocomplete filled in 'white elephant' before | the parser got to 'chip plant'. | ksec wrote: | Intel said the same thing for Arizona as well. Initial $20B | investment which could expand to $100B. So they are building it | in two places. I wonder why they dont keep it all in Arizona? ( | May be Tax Break, but I have no idea how Tax Break works in US ) | | And if you include their (expected) expansion in EUR, Intel is | layering the foundation for Foundry Services. Compared to its | half assed Custom Foundry in 2012/2013 with little to zero CapEx | increase. Foundry Services 2.0 is very _real_. | | Note: Investor Notes from ASML are also interesting, suggesting | Intel may be ahead in terms of High-NA EUV orders. Initial | shipment expected in 2023. | flybrand wrote: | > why not all AZ? | | Game theory between US states playing to get the most gov't | assistance? | | Finite pool of talent? Our plants are in rural areas and | everyone is struggling to hire, from auto to bakeries. | SemAntics0 wrote: | The Great Lakes region has a surprising concentration of | advanced manufacturing skillsets. With large manufacturing | facilities with extremely stringent quality standards like a | bleeding edge chip fab there's going to be a enormous need | for people with traditional manufacturing-specific support | skillsets that are simply not available in large quantities | anywhere else in the US. | | If the current administration's support of the transition to | electric vehicles doesn't falter, that's going to drive an | increasing need for microprocessors in vehicles. Intel | locating themselves in central Ohio puts their production | facilities on an interstate highway hub that puts them within | a 6-12 hour drive of nearly every major auto manufacturing | facility in the US, which is an enormous incentive for the | auto manufacturers to source from them. Additionally, | Columbus has the Rickenbacker International Airport which is | a dedicated air freight airport that lets them get their | product global faster. | | This announcement of two facilities makes me think that | Phoenix is going to be a smaller facility handling the more | advanced, smaller run chip designs, but host the R&D and | design offices (To take advantage of the city's concentration | of tech talent) while Columbus is going to be the primary | production facility. | galangalalgol wrote: | the only thing an ev actually needs chips for is charge | controllers which can be old fab tech, and motor | controllers which aren't normal silicon or tiny feature | size. Tesla is using silicon carbide, and gallium arsenide | will probably be next. | | The Bollinger takes this route of minimalism. Ironically, | an EV has less reliance on processing than a modern ICE | vehicle. | ridgeguy wrote: | I think it's gallium nitride (GaN), not gallium arsenide | (GaAs). | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Automotive EE here... | | > the only thing an ev actually needs chips for is charge | controllers which can be old fab tech, and motor | controllers | | I wish I had the time to explain how this could not be | more wrong. | | Quickly, I'll mention that the vehicle I'm working on has | 8 separate modules for the driver's seat. Inside these | modules are a combined total of 10 processors with as | many bootloaders and flash procedures and validation | records and crypto and peripheral drivers, 17 CAN-FD | modules, 6 system basis chips, 9 switching power supplies | with a number of accessory LDO supplies, at least 40 more | "chips" of various functions and capacities... for _just_ | the driver's seat alone | | The steering wheel buttons for radio left and right side | and the cruise control comprise 3 modules and power | supplies and etc etc. | | >The Bollinger takes this route of minimalism. | Ironically, an EV has less reliance on processing than a | modern ICE vehicle. | | I know what you are trying to say, but it is largely | incorrect. The EVs still have "engine" control modules | and powertrain systems. Instead of figuring out injector | pulse widths, they're calculating deliverable torque. The | ABS/brake controllers are more complex, the battery | heating and cooling systems require modules and | processing, the HVAC, the transmission, steering systems, | everything is more complex compared to ICE with an old | ample supply of hydraulics and coolants and a simple fuel | that is stable and usable at all storage temps fed into a | mechanical device. | | I'm not trying to be confrontational, but you couldn't be | more wrong about automotive electronics. | vel0city wrote: | The previous poster is definitely massively | oversimplifying things, and I do value your input as | someone who actually works in the field. Obviously, | there's still a lot of the same kind of controllers when | it comes to all the switches and displays and motorized | chairs and turn signal logic and all of those things | which are practically the exact same as an ICE. And | obviously there's some places where you don't need | controllers and sensors on an EV where you would have | them on an ICE, like mass airflow sensors and fuel | injection controls and stuff like that. Meanwhile you do | have additional circuitry like the inverters to actually | drive the motors, BMS systems, there's still sensors on | the motors and wheels and what not, brake regen, etc. | | You mentioned the transmission is more complex compared | to an ICE, but that does not make much sense to me at | all. To my knowledge most EVs are essentially fixed gear | ratio gearboxes, so you're either in drive, reverse, or | neutral. Meanwhile ICE transmissions are becoming more | and more like computer-controlled manual transmissions | what with the rise in popularity of dual-clutch automatic | transmissions. To me it seems a _ton_ more complicated | keeping track of operating that DCT than just "the dial | is in D, change transmission to the forward mode." | bbreier wrote: | Also the infotainment. And real questions because I'm | genuinely curious: do driver assists (ABS, ASR, TCS) and | their adjustments rely on processors? What about in-car | adjustments to suspension height, ride firmness, throttle | response (e.g. eco vs sport vs comfort modes)? Lane keep | assist, blind spot checking, adaptive cruise control all | seem like things that would require processing power as | well. | nradov wrote: | Most current vehicles use separate embedded | microcontrollers for those features. In principle it's | possible to build a car with a single powerful processor | controlling everything, but the engineering becomes far | more challenging and you need a higher level of vertical | integration on the parts supply chain. There are also | safety risks: you don't want an LKA code defect to cause | a TCS failure. And wiring harness would have to grow to | carry all the separate data signals. | | Tesla is partially going the integration route but they | still have many separate processors in the car. | totalZero wrote: | > do driver assists (ABS, ASR, TCS) and their adjustments | rely on processors? | | If I'm not mistaken, microprocessors aren't the only | semiconductor components that have been in short supply | recently. Things like shaft position sensors are also | solid-state devices. | lotsofpulp wrote: | The only infotainment a car needs is interfacing with | CarPlay/Android Auto. | hnov wrote: | Even headlights and brake pedals (brake by wire) have ICs | in them these days, I doubt getting rid of a PCM will | make an EV less IC heavy. | hnov wrote: | Do EVs not have all of the ancillaries hanging off CANBUS | or something? Or is the lion's share of chips in an ICE | vehicle engine and transmission control? | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | Of course. | | There isn't an EV in the world that is less complex than | it's ICE counterpart. GP is very mistaken. I wrote a | longer explanation above. | dillondoyle wrote: | I was surprised to learn Minnesota has a fab that's | critical to the US govt! They are one of the only secure | trusted chip makers. | | Growing up there I had no idea. My dad loved to talk up | MMM, Honeywell, Monsanto and a bunch of other legacy | companies in MN that still play huge roles that I have | overlooked. | | Just one article at top of search I found even talks about | the public-private partnerships (tax & other incentives) | | https://www.aroundosceola.com/news/skywater-seeks-dod- | approv... | missedthecue wrote: | Ohio is situated on the great lakes and therefore has a lot | of cheaply available water, while Arizona does not. Chip | production is water intensive. Not to mention the vast | expanses of cheap land, and their electricity costs are | pretty low as well. | | These could be reasons. | ksec wrote: | Modern Fabs can recycle its water usage by up to 90%. | Electricity cost for Business in both state seems to be | about the same. Land are cheap as well ( From what I have | been told ). | | You do get operational efficiency from having Fabs all | located within one place. And that is a quote from TSMC's | ex-CEO Morris Chang. That is why I wonder if there is | something missing. Or is it the simplest explanation Not to | put all eggs in one basket. | vasili111 wrote: | > Or is it the simplest explanation Not to put all eggs | in one basket. | | I think this is important part. If something happens to | one site (problem with electricity, etc) other will work. | | Also, it maybe easier to find workforce that way. | | Also it will be good for development for that regions. | RC_ITR wrote: | Arguments can be made that TSMC's choice to consolidate | locations is part of the reason that we have a semi | shortage right now (concentrated water shortage risk, | concentrated worker illness risk, etc. etc.) | pradn wrote: | All this sounds irrelevant when an ASML machine costs $100 | million a pop. | vasili111 wrote: | > ASML machine costs | | It seems that cost maybe around $300 million each: | https://whbl.com/2022/01/19/intel-orders-asml-machine- | still-... | dralley wrote: | Those are the new high-NA EUV machines. The current gen | ones are more in the range of 150 million. | adventured wrote: | It's political distribution, to be called upon as needed. | Same reason NASA is sprawled the way it is. | | You can more easily get numerous Senators to go to bat for | you and your various causes (Arizona is a growth state, | Ohio still has a lot of clout (not as much as CA, TX, FL | obviously)). | jdhn wrote: | They're building the plant near Columbus, which isn't near | the Great Lakes. If they wanted Great Lakes water they | would've chosen Cleveland, which is very close to Lake | Erie. | RC_ITR wrote: | Semantically, damning water in the Great Lakes Watershed | (how Columbus get's its water) is not THAT different from | letting that water flow into Lake Erie and then piping it | back. | | Point being, Ohio has very few long-term drought | concerns. | giraffe_lady wrote: | There are actually extremely specific and intense rules | about which parts of the country can take water from the | great lakes and what burdens they incur when they do. | | It's not necessarily aligned with any specific | jurisdictions either, I believe it's largely based on the | boundaries of the watersheds. Or at least where the | boundary was ascertained to be at some point. | | So yes it's very different, regardless of the | semantics(?). | kesselvon wrote: | The idea that the Great Lakes are going to be tapped to | solve water problems outside the watershed is fall flat | when they realize those Great Lakes states aren't going | to sell off access like that. | | I remember some moonshot proposal to pipe the water to | the Southwest, which is wild. | Scoundreller wrote: | There might be redirecting (or excessive drawing) of | tributaries though. | Kon-Peki wrote: | It's surprising, actually, how small the Great Lakes | watershed is, compared to the surface area of the lakes. | You really aren't going to get much of anything from | tributaries; if you want some of the water you draw it | from the lakes. | theandrewbailey wrote: | > Semantically, damning water in the Great Lakes | Watershed (how Columbus get's its water) | | Wrong. Columbus gets most of its water from the Scioto | River, part of the Ohio/Mississippi River watershed. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scioto_River | | You might be thinking about Cleveland instead, but I | don't think anyone dares drink from the Cuyahoga River, | since its had a history of catching fire. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuyahoga_River | adamcstephens wrote: | Akron's reservoir is on the Cuyahoga River just North of | Kent. Though this is far upstream from "catching fire" | location. | | https://www.akronohio.gov/cms/Water/Watershed_Cuyahoga/in | dex... | todfox wrote: | Columbus is not in the Lake Erie watershed. It is in the | Ohio River watershed. The Great Lakes Compact does not | allow Columbus to get its water from Lake Erie. | graycat wrote: | > Cleveland, which is very close to Lake Erie. | | It's on the shore of Lake Erie. If it were any closer to | Lake Erie it would be underwater! | | Lake Erie is not so far from Columbus: When I was a prof | at Ohio State, my wife and I would go to Lake Erie just | for a pleasant Saturday afternoon. So we'd go to | Cleveland, ..., Sandusky, etc. | thehappypm wrote: | Are you from California? It rains a ton in that part of | the country, water is not scarce. It's hard for | Californians to wrap their heads around but water is not | universally rare. | pkulak wrote: | Yeah, but they are building in Columbus. | jandrese wrote: | I thought that while chip production uses a lot of water, | the water is mostly not consumed in the process and due to | environmental regulation the water has to be cleaned at the | plant so they form a closed loop system. It takes a lot of | water when the plant is built, but after that it requires | only a small amount of water to continue running. | brewdad wrote: | Water in AZ is some of the cheapest in the country. At | least until Lake Powell runs dry. Not a bad idea to spread | the risks around however. | spaetzleesser wrote: | When you look at Lake Mead and Lake Powell lately it | seems they are well on the path to running dry. | xxpor wrote: | No wonder they grow all that lettuce in Yuma. | | Seems extremely stupid from a long term perspective, but | what do I know. I'm just a software guy. | bcrosby95 wrote: | They grow lettuce in Yuma during the winter because it's | warm enough to grow it there during the winter. Something | around 90% of the USA's winter grown leafy greens produce | comes from Yuma. | xxpor wrote: | Why not florida? | reaperducer wrote: | _At least until Lake Powell runs dry_ | | Which is coming a lot quicker than anyone expected. It's | why all of the cities and water authorities hooked up to | Powell and the other Colorado River reservoirs are in | panic mode these days. | | Just a few weeks ago, the various states came to an | agreement about cutting water use. Lake Mead is at | historic lows. There are mandatory federal restrictions | either in effect, or about to start. | [deleted] | WillPostForFood wrote: | The Intel plant in AZ plant is in Chandler, which is more | suburban than rural - it can draw on much of the Phoenix | Metro population (4.5million) for hiring. | uoaei wrote: | Sucking the Colorado river dry probably has a lot to do with | it. | | Taiwan was (is still?) in a drought and semiconductor | manufacturing requires so much fresh water that TSMC was | bringing in huge tanks on ships from the mainland. | nebula8804 wrote: | >Our plants are in rural areas and everyone is struggling to | hire, from auto to bakeries. | | This is a solved problem isn't it? Just pay people more and | treat them with dignity and respect. The pandemic has given a | lot of people the opportunity to realize that they do not | have to settle for poorly paid jobs that treat people poorly. | You should have realized and adjusted by now. If you cannot | accommodate to these requirements, then you have no place in | this market anymore. Just close up shop and move on. | dillondoyle wrote: | I agree about the game theory/race to the bottom as an | incentive. I think there are more great reasons compounding | these decisions that others point out too. | | Large corporations love to hold cities and states hostage and | make them bid against each other. AMZN is a great example | with their campus 2 bidding war. I am glad NY had the cajones | to stand up to them. | | Most cities and states even have dedicated EcoDevo staff to | actively seek out these companies. | | Cities and states compete to give the largest tax benefits, | usually something like you don't have to pay ___ taxes for __ | years (like 10, worth tens of millions). Plus they'll spend | on infrastructure and give preferential zoning, city regs, | etc. | | Sure having more jobs probably creates more incoming/housing | taxes for the city. | | But states like Texas win this race to the bottom (TSLA and | Musk personally) and in my opinion the costs of these | corporate incentives (imho handouts) are just passed along to | citizens in the cost of less societal services and needs, | less school funding, less everything. Just a funnel up. | nebula8804 wrote: | Musk may be an outlier. He is part of a collective of | libertarian techbros who have taken what they can out of | California and are now looking for a new set of suckers. | Texas has a history of playing second fiddle to California | so they were an obvious choice. | | Yes other tech companies are also moving to Austin and I | think that is more a sign of some millennials and other | young professionals opting to leave California for a lower | cost reasonably sane area. Its still does not seem like | massive California sized numbers though. We just have to | wait and see. I'm still long California though. | unchocked wrote: | National security considerations encourage geographic | dispersal of strategic assets. | ksec wrote: | Here is a much better article from Anandtech | | https://www.anandtech.com/show/17221/intel-announces-ohio-fa... | reaperducer wrote: | _I wonder why they dont keep it all in Arizona?_ | | Maybe water? | | I've read a bunch of newspaper articles from that region | recently about how people in Arizona and New Mexico are getting | very pissy about water going to new industries. And from what I | read on HN, chip manufacturing needs lots of water. | | One thing Ohio seems to have plenty of is water. At least | compared to places like Arizona. | qsmi wrote: | Increasing supply chain resiliency by having multiple, | geographically separated, sites this more of a thing now. | | https://hbr.org/2020/09/global-supply-chains-in-a-post-pande... | | "The obvious way to address heavy dependence on one medium-risk | or high-risk source (a single factory, supplier, or region) is | to add more sources in locations not vulnerable to the same | risks." | sanp wrote: | also, resiliency against adverse action in the Senate. they | now have 4 senators who are unlikely to vote on anything | damaging to Intel | KoftaBob wrote: | That's similar to the method defense contractors use, they | spread out their manufacturing locations to have influence | over as many politicians as possible. | azemetre wrote: | This is an interesting point I never thought of before. Now | I wonder if the tech giants would have faired better | politically if they weren't all co-located in one of the | most politically polarizing areas of the country. | vel0city wrote: | It is a part of the reason why all the big government | contractors are spread out all over the place. Even | around a single metro area they'll have different offices | in different congressional districts. | nebula8804 wrote: | If you are on the winning end of that bloat life is pure | happiness and joy. But if you are on the losing end (ie. | not employed/a beneficiary of these firms) then you are | paying dearly for the joy that others have. | brewdad wrote: | 6. Intel is the largest private employer in Oregon as well. | dfsegoat wrote: | Right. Interesting take on that below re: Taiwan/TSMC, etc: | | https://www.supplychainbrain.com/articles/32482-the-world- | is... | WillPostForFood wrote: | _Manufacturing Jobs Are Never Coming Back_ | | https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/manufacturing-jobs-are-... | dodobirdlord wrote: | What is the meaning of this comment? Are you highlighting the | article title because you think that it's incorrect in the | context of this fab being built? Fabs like this are automated | to the greatest extent possible, and the remaining jobs are | mostly high-skill. The article makes this point directly. | | > Here's the problem: Whether or not those manufacturing jobs | could have been saved, they aren't coming back, at least not | most of them. How do we know? Because in recent years, | factories have been coming back, but the jobs haven't. Because | of rising wages in China, the need for shorter supply chains | and other factors, a small but growing group of companies are | shifting production back to the U.S. But the factories they | build here are heavily automated, employing a small fraction of | the workers they would have a generation ago. | dmead wrote: | they aren't making tube socks. | MathCodeLove wrote: | I've actually been considering a move to Ohio this June. Any | suggestions for whetr in Ohio I should look? My main | consideration is low CoL as I work remotely but I'd like there to | be stuff to do within a reasonable driving distance. | buscoquadnary wrote: | If you are looking at Northern Ohio, Strongsville, North | Royalton, Solon, Perrysburg, Parma Heights, Massillion all are | decent places. | selimthegrim wrote: | Parma/Parma Heights has the reputation of being the "Staten | Island" of Cleveland FYI | gaoshan wrote: | Columbus. I moved to Ohio from Florida some years back and do | not regret it at all. I get so much more for my money that it | feels like a cheat code. | | Move to Columbus and look into the various suburban | communities. A fantastic one that is up and coming (though it's | really getting quite far along that arc) is called Grandview. | Leafy, compact, cute, cool shops, bike paths and restaurants | and only 10 minutes from downtown, even in traffic. There are | many more so do dig in and look around. I live in the greater | Cleveland area and it's also good... just not Columbus good. If | you want space look to the northern suburbs. There are a number | that are extremely nice. | selimthegrim wrote: | Cleveland has older and higher quality cultural institutions | on your doorstep if that sort of thing is your jam. | sergiotapia wrote: | Looking at a 5 bedroom home and the prices seem just in line | with Miami prices here in West Kendall (3000 sq feet). Where | are you looking that feels like a cheat code? | gaoshan wrote: | I just checked 5 bedroom homes in Kendall and the cheapest | on the first page of results was just under $800k. The | average (first 6 results on Realtor.com) is $1,029,333. | With Columbus you have to check the various neighborhoods | (like Kendall is to Miami) so checking one of the nicer | ones (Dublin) I see 4 in the $600k range with an average of | the first 6 results of $837,283. That makes Dublin (a | suburb of Columbus with top schools and higher than average | incomes) quite a bit cheaper in the huge house arena. | | Kendall's average household income is $73,612 while | Dublin's is $137,867. If I picked a neighborhood with an | equivalent household income the price difference would be | even more stark. | mcdonje wrote: | Cleveland and Cincinnati have the best architecture and natural | features. | jeffbee wrote: | And spectacular symphony orchestras. | N1H1L wrote: | Both Columbus and Cincy are great. Cleveland is iffy and too | snowy in my opinion | tonyhb wrote: | Living in Cincy and it's pretty okay! If you're like me and | you're coming from the bay then, well, you need a car. Many | people that aren't in tech. Smaller town vibes, but that's a | pretty good thing. Mortgage for a 3/4 bedroom with a garden | etc. is 1/2 of my SF rent. | sfotm wrote: | I'm an Ohio native that's recently moved back to the Columbus | area myself. I know the area pretty intimately. Happy to | respond to any questions about the area, as I'd love for | there to be a larger tech scene around here. | scruple wrote: | Just out of curiosity, as another Ohio native who left and | sometimes thinks of returning, where did you move back to | Ohio from? | sfotm wrote: | I was in Seattle before moving back. | rybosome wrote: | Columbus to Seattle was my journey as well, but I have no | intention of going back. What brought you back to Ohio? | sfotm wrote: | A few things, some that are pretty general, and some that | are pretty specific to my situation. | | 1. Family in general plays a large role. | | 2. I'm able to make stronger financial moves. Property is | appreciating relatively quickly in the Columbus area, and | purchase-cost-to-rent ratios are better here, from the | investor PoV. | | 3. Full remote means that I'm still able to visit Seattle | for the larger mountaineering trips, etc. that I like to | take part in while being based out of a lower-CoL area. | After several years, I was going to have to start taking | flights to new destinations, anyway. | | 4. Opportunity to give back to the communities that gave | me my start. | | And some other factors come in, too. Covid definitely | reduced my perceived benefit of living in Seattle. | Nothing's forever though. It's a two-way door. | 3825 wrote: | Two questions, does the area have symmetric gigabit fiber? | If so, how reliable is it in your opinion? If not, what is | the best option for multiple family members working from | home? | | How are water, electricity, sewage, road condition, | utilities situation? Any reasons why a work from home | worker might not want to live there? | sfotm wrote: | The internet infrastructure in Columbus isn't on par with | a lot of the larger cities, and I think you'd have a hard | time finding the speeds you're looking for, judging by | what I've found - seems like there's some limited AT&T | fiber, but it's not widespread. My service is reliable, | though, and I haven't found bandwidth to be a problem as | a full-remote employee. | | Utilities are solid and seem much less suspect to outages | compared to Seattle, a city I have a lot of experience | living in. It's as though having more extreme weather | more often ensures that the infrastructure is up to a | certain rigor. | | Roads are important here, and are well-maintained and | addressed (e.g. expect trucks to be salting roads in | anticipation for snow storms). Roads are also incredibly | well-laid out in an inner/outer belt system that I miss | when driving in other cities. | nickthegreek wrote: | I am very happy in Columbus. I hear Cleveland has better | nightlife, but I came from up that way and the snow | difference between Columbus and Cleveland is huge. I do not | miss it. | justin66 wrote: | Has snowplow service improved at all in Columbus? I was | always struck by how bad it was compared to Cleveland. They | got less snow, but dealt with the snow they got pretty | badly. | Spooky23 wrote: | I spent a few days in Cincinnati on our baseball tour a few | years ago and had a great time. Seemed to have a city/small | town vibe, and is a days drive from Chicago or Atlanta. | | Don't know the area terribly well, but it seemed like a place | that we wanted to "get to know" better. | | My family also really liked Pittsburgh. | twoquestions wrote: | Toledo's pretty good too, and there's a bunch of smaller cities | around that have already shrunk as much as they're going to. | Roads are decent too, even though everyone complains about the | construction (until they take a trip through Michigan). | | Be careful going too cheap, as the rural parts have utterly | terrible Internet service. A buddy of mine can't even play Deep | Rock Galactic with us and his Discord calls sound robotic. | reaperducer wrote: | When people ask me about Ohio, I always whole-hartedly | recommend Cincinnati. | | But then you added "stuff to do within a reasonable driving | distance," and I think that tips the scales in favor of | Cleveland. | | And if you want to leave the car at home, you can take Amtrak | from Cleveland to New York, Chicago, Toronto, Philadelphia, | Baltimore, and D.C. | | I still love Cincinnati, but until international flying gets | back in order, it's not an ideal starting point for adventure. | hardolaf wrote: | I mean, you can take the Amtrak from Cleveland to Chicago... | but it leaves at like 3:30 AM which is why I never take | Amtrak to Cleveland to visit my family from Chicago. | mc32 wrote: | Isn't Cincinnati excessively humid? On the other hand I hear | the winters are cold but they lift pretty quick and don't | linger on. | reaperducer wrote: | Humid, yes. Excessively so? Not compared to a lot of other | places in America. Houston. Louisiana. Florida. Coastal | Carolinas. I guess it depends on how well your particular | body handles humidity. | | Cincinnati has fairly mild winters compared with the rest | of Ohio. A meteorologist there explained it to me once. I | think something about being in a valley, and the rivers | (Ohio and Little Miami) moderate things a bit. | | He said in weather circles, it's sometimes called "the | banana belt of Ohio." | kragen wrote: | Moving to Ohio was one of the worst decisions I made in my | life. Dayton is proud of its history of innovation but most of | the innovators left for California 50 years ago where | innovation was allowed. What's left is the lumbering | bureaucracies and sprawling empires that grew from the | innovators' products: NCR, the GM plant, Otis. | hnthrowaway0315 wrote: | Aside from Cal, which other State(s) do you consider to be at | least growing a culture of innovation? Just curious because | might move to US from Canada in the future. | walnutclosefarm wrote: | Minnesota's twin cities plus Rochester. Excellent place if | you're interested in biomedical, health care technology | innovation. Top ranked companies headquartered there, a | great university, the Mayo Clinic. Really top notch. | | But if you're moving from Canada to escape the cold, | Minnesota is not the place to stop. It's a bit warmer than | Winnepeg, but colder than Toronto and the rest of Eastern | Canada by quite a bit. | quantumwannabe wrote: | Innovation is a function of you and the people you work | with, not where you live. You should be looking at the team | you will be working on, not the reputation of a physical | place or company. If you fail to do that, you will be | disappointed when the reality inevitably doesn't match the | hype. Nearly every state has loads of smart and innovative | people, despite what HN's regional bias would lead you to | believe. The exception would be the very tiny states, but | they still have smart people, just fewer of them. | kragen wrote: | The people you work with (in person) is to a significant | extent a function of where you live, though, and what the | team is allowed to attempt is even more so. Maybe there | are a hundred smart and innovative fluorine chemists in | your state, but 30 of them are assholes, 20 retired, 40 | already have jobs too good to hire them away from, and | the other 10 aren't allowed to do any lab work because of | NIMBYs or because your legislature associates chemistry | primarily with _Breaking Bad_. (That 's a big problem in | California today, but it wasn't 50 years ago.) | hnthrowaway0315 wrote: | Thanks, sounds reasonable. Although I'll probably look at | the area too. | hardolaf wrote: | Chicago, IL is a hotbed. Boston, MA also is doing great | these days. Texas and Ohio seem to be in a race to the | bottom in terms of the types of work they're trying to | attract. | bonestamp2 wrote: | I'm sure there are more, and I haven't been everywhere, but | these are ones that stand out to me: | | - Greater Boston area (outside of Boston, the high tech | companies are pretty scattered) | | - Chicago (and the North/West suburbs) | | - Virginia (Tysons, Alexandria) | | - North Carolina (Research Triangle) | | - Portland | | - Austin | | The obvious ones: Bay Area, LA, NYC, Seattle area | | If you're into specific industries, then there are areas | that are more focused than others. | ghaff wrote: | Boston isn't as scattered as it was 20 years ago. A lot | of pharma and biotech in Kendall Square as well as | outposts of California companies. And there are various | startups maybe especially in the Seaport. Amazon has a | lot of space in the Seaport as well. | | But, yes, the computer industry in Massachusetts always | tended to be in Metrowest and the defense contractors | were/are out in the suburbs as well. | kragen wrote: | Maybe Taiwan, Singapore, and Bangladesh? Canada's pretty | great too. | gaoshan wrote: | The region you live in matters greatly. Take Dayton. It | doesn't impact me as I have not been anywhere near Dayton in | all the years I've live in Ohio. Columbus, on the other hand, | is a really nice city with a great vibe. I'm guessing it | could be like saying, "Don't move to California. Moving to | Riverside was the worst decision of my life." The real | message is don't move to places that are down and out. | kragen wrote: | Columbus did seem nicer when I visited. But is it really | "not down and out"? | werm82 wrote: | It's one of only 14 cities in the US to gain 100k | residents in the last decade. | kragen wrote: | What startups has it produced in the last decade? Or, | more knowably, the decade before that, 02002-02012? | werm82 wrote: | CoverMyMeds, Root Insurance, and Olive are a couple of | unicorns. | mNovak wrote: | CoverMyMeds was the recent poster child ($1B exit). Ohio | has a large focus on insurance and med/biotech. | PKop wrote: | Root insurance has been a recent one | | https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/rootinsurance | | CoverMyMeds another | | https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/covermymeds-com | | At least for a Midwest city, investment does seem to be | picking up | | https://news.yahoo.com/columbus-startup-funding- | skyrocketing... | kragen wrote: | That's pretty significant! | fullstop wrote: | Most people are trying to move in the opposite direction. With | that being said, here's a few interesting things about Ohio: | 1. Vehicle safety inspections are not required 2. It's | very flat, but their flag is the only non-rectangular state | flag 3. Due to an oversight (congress never voted -- | oops!), Ohio was not officially admitted to the union until | 1953. | | If you want stuff to do within a reasonable distance you might | want to look at the eastern side, near Pittsburgh. | rurp wrote: | I'm not sure what #1 means. Can you expand on it? I don't | recall ever putting a car through something like that. | fullstop wrote: | Many states require an annual vehicle safety inspection, | often accompanied by an emissions test. | | In Pennsylvania, I have to have my car tested each year. | They make sure that tire tread depth, remaining brake pads, | exterior lamps, and windshield wipers are all functional / | within tolerance. There's other stuff that you can be | failed for, such as excessive rust, etc. | | That's one other thing to know about Ohio. Your car _will_ | rust. It 's a cancer that will slowly eat your car, even if | you do an undercarriage wash. | wfleming wrote: | Some states do an annual safety inspection of vehicles - | it's usually more or less "do your turn signals, brakes, | and head lights work". Nowadays some states also need to do | an emissions check. Some states require it every other | year, some states I guess don't really require it at all? | brewdad wrote: | I had to do an "inspection" when I moved to AZ and first | registered my car. I dreaded what they might find since | it was kind of a heap of junk. The inspection consisted | of making sure the VIN matched up on the various | locations on the car. | throwawayboise wrote: | IDK how many states don't require it, but Indiana, just | to the west of Ohio, does not require safety inspections | for personal vehicles. A few counties near Chicago do | emissions testing I think. | mNovak wrote: | Not sure I'd suggest eastern Ohio, that's rural Appalachia, I | would not recommend for interesting things. | fullstop wrote: | I was more suggesting that you leave Ohio to do interesting | things in the Pittsburgh area. | geenew wrote: | Couldn't find much info on the process size in the Reuters | article, but the Intel press release[0] says this: | | " "The Ohio factories are designed for the 'Angstrom era,' with | support for Intel's most advanced process technologies, including | Intel 18A." | | This[1] doesn't give a transistor density for 18A, but the 20A | transistor density is greater than the TMSC 3nm, fwiw. | | [0] | https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/intel-... | [1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/16823/intel-accelerated- | offen... | ksec wrote: | 18A is consider as 1.8nm in TSMC terms. | HPsquared wrote: | 1 A = 0.1 nm, which is roughly the diameter of a hydrogen | atom. | tux3 wrote: | This mandatory comment is your threadly reminder that node | names are entirely unrelated to any physical dimensions, as | has been the case for many years now. | | You should not interpret node names as meaning anything | more than a point on the semiconductor roadmap. Nodes that | share the same names across foundries will not have the | same performance characteristics, but are usually roughly | comparable (especially since Intel's new naming scheme). | RC_ITR wrote: | Well, there's always a distance between SOMETHING that | each company can point to, it's just those things are | constantly changing. | WithinReason wrote: | Definitely not entirely unrelated. | localhost wrote: | Somewhat related- this reminds me of this recent fact | that I learned [1] that 1" camera sensors are not 1" in | any dimension whatsoever. That number is rooted in | historical diameter of a tube that video camera "sensors" | were housed in. That tube was 1" in diameter. | | [1] https://youtu.be/-njHjebtIg4?t=495 | HPsquared wrote: | CRT monitors and TVs were the same: the advertised size | was the size of the picture tube, not of the visible | area. | qsmi wrote: | > node names are entirely unrelated to any physical | dimensions | | I agree they're not necessarily related to any particular | transistor dimension but are you sure it's entirely | unrelated to any physical dimensions? If so, here is a | question I have. 28nm, 22nm, 20nm, 14nm, 10nm, 7nm, 5nm, | 3nm. What progression is that? Why skip 6nm and 4nm? | dragontamer wrote: | A "full node" step is 1/2 the area of the previous. Since | area is dimension-squared, 28 x 28 == ~800 area, while 20 | x 20 == ~400 area. | | So 28 -> 20 is a "full node" decrease (ie: twice the | transistors). | | --------- | | We can see the full-node step from 14nm -> 10nm as well: | 14 x 14 == ~200, 10x10 == 100. So its a full node step. | The next full-node is 7 x 7 == ~50, which is half of 100. | After 7 comes 5, because 25 is half of 50. | | The next full node is sqrt(12.5) or 3.5, smack dab | between 3 and 4, so not really easy to round. | | --------- | | The steps in between are "half-node" decrements, where | you didn't quite achieve a full 1/2 area reduction. An | incremental technology that represents something in | between the full node step progression. | qsmi wrote: | That's an interesting explanation and somehow I never | heard it explained that way before. It makes sense if one | thinks of the transistor count doubling relative to where | that company previously was, and not where the industry | is. In the transistor density plot each curve is roughly | x^2, but with different initial conditions. | | https://www.techcenturion.com/7nm-10nm-14nm-fabrication | dragontamer wrote: | 2^x, not x^2. | | x^2 is 1, 4, 9, 16, 25. | | 2^x is 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 | [deleted] | gaoshan wrote: | This is actually a brilliant location for them. One of those | places that has much more going for it than people not from the | region would realize. | | International airport, large rail depot, extremely low cost of | living and a city/region that has more good restaurants and | activities than might be expected. Ohio State University is in | the city and is a huge school that is rapidly growing in academic | standing. Road transit in the area is also very good allowing | access to any part of the city from any other part in rapid | fashion. Good schools, relatively low crime, etc. Probably the | only drawback, from a lifestyle point of view, would be the | winter and that's not even that bad, compared to other winter | regions. | lr4444lr wrote: | Does it have a sufficiently educated workforce, or can it | convince enough of one to move there, though? | gaoshan wrote: | It has Ohio State University. One of the largest Universities | in the world (50,000-ish students) and one that has been | rising in the rankings steadily over the last couple of | decades. It's quite a decent public school today. There are | over a dozen colleges and universities right in and around | the city. | MichiganHere wrote: | planetsprite wrote: | However it's misguided. Cost of labor is still 10x higher than | a plant with the same productivity in a relatively poorer | country. American manufacturing is mostly indirect social | welfare now, it's not economically efficient. | enkid wrote: | Is cost of labor really one of the major costs of a | semiconductor plant? Plants in South Korea and Taiwan are | economical and they have relatively high labor costs, so I'm | not sure I buy this. | vizzier wrote: | This was my thought as well, chip production has to be so | necessarily automated to maintain a clean state that it | feels like the cost of engineers to maintain systems is | always going to be high, but also a small cost of the | overall system. I'd love some real numbers. | bendhoefs wrote: | It's not like semiconductor plants are using the cheapest | possible labor they can get their hands on. I imagine there | are very few people working in semiconductor plants that | don't have post secondary education. | N1H1L wrote: | The midwest has some of the greatest engineering schools in the | nation. I have been beating this drum hoarse for a few years | now - but it's true. Specifically, members of the Big 10 | conference are probably the best engineering schools conference | in the world. Within 300 miles from Columbus (where you have | Ohio State - Big10), you have Penn State, Michigan, Michigan | State, UIUC, Indiana, Purdue from the Big 10 along with | Carnegie Mellon, Case Western and Pitt. Even the state of | California doesn't have so many so good tech schools. | kragen wrote: | CMU, CWRU, UMich, UIUC, and Indiana U are wonderful schools, | but none of them are in Ohio [correction: I'm an idiot, CWRU | is]. OSU doesn't belong in that list. | justin66 wrote: | I can assure you that CWRU is still in Cleveland, Ohio. | kragen wrote: | Ugh, how embarrassing. Of course it is. And it's still a | great school. Unlike U of Indiana, I _haven 't_ been to | CWRU. Thank you for the correction. | GeorgeTirebiter wrote: | Do you know where Don Knuth did his undergrad? | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Knuth for the | answer. Then, he wised up and came out here... ;-) | kragen wrote: | Yup! That's where the much-honored Type 650 was. | justin66 wrote: | No need for embarrassment but I do wonder where you | thought it was. :) | | One night while struggling with a problem for work I took | a walk and wandered by where I calculated the IBM 650 | must have been located back in the day, hoping for some | kind of inspiration, or something. It was a good | distraction but it did not work at all. | graycat wrote: | "U of Indiana"? Used to be called Indiana University (IU)? | kragen wrote: | Corrected, thanks, I'm an idiot. And I've actually _been | there_. | graycat wrote: | I was a math grad student at IU. The place had one heck | of a good music school, say, comparable to the best in | the world. An Isaac Stern protege, later a concert | master, violin prof, conductor, etc., put his old Italian | violin under my left chin, and I was hooked. | | Took a violin course; the teacher, one on one, was FAR | too good for what I needed and later played the Brahms | concerto in Toronto! According to the rules, at the end | had to play for the violin faculty, including the former | concert master of the Cleveland Symphony -- poor guy! | Eventually I made it through much of the Bach E Major | Partita and the Chaconne! Great fun! Met my wife. | | The math department had some good mathematicians. The | weekly seminar flew in some of the best mathematicians in | the world. Later where I got my Ph.D., at a much more | _famous_ school, the seminars were nowhere near as good. | | As a grad student, since I was teaching ugrad courses, I | got paid, enough actually to live nicely, e.g., eat all | my meals in restaurants, and save some money! | | But I didn't _fit_ into their program: (1) My first | semester they put me in their abstract algebra course. | Okay: I 'd done well in a similar course in ugrad school, | and my ugrad honors paper was on group representations. | So that I wouldn't have to waste time in the course, the | prof and I had an unspoken agreement: At the end he gave | me a little oral exam in his office -- I went through | some Galois theory! (2) They put me in a topology course, | from the famous book by Kelley. In the first class, the | prof said that the homework was to work all the | exercises! HA! Some of the exercises were notoriously | difficult! I wondered if HE could work all the exercises! | Besides, in ugrad school I'd taken a _reading course_ | from that book -- once a week gave a lecture to a prof, | chapter by chapter, one week on the theorems and the next | week on the exercises. For the material on Moore-Smith | convergence, a second prof showed up -- maybe he wanted | to learn some about that topic! I wrote out solutions to | about 1 /3rd of the exercises (to be _honest_ not the | same ~1 /3rd I'd done in ugrad), turned them in at the | end, and did show for the final exam. (3) They put me in | a real analysis course. On the first test, with just one | exercise, in set theory, the prof wanted to "see me after | class". He had marked my test paper as wrong. Gee, I | doubt that many students got that exercise. Since the | previous summer I'd had a course in axiomatic set theory, | the test was easy for me. When I explained to the prof | that my notation, I didn't have time on the test to | define, was standard, he saw that (A) my solution was | correct and (B), as we both noticed and he confessed, was | one step shorter than his. I didn't know that prof, had | never had any interaction with him, but concluded he was | for whatever reason _on my case_. My victory over him on | that test was enough for me -- I never saw him again. No | biggie loss: The book he was using was awful, e.g., was | just some typed notes -- Royden, one of the best math | texts ever, was MUCH better! | | So, net, I did my teaching, used some of the money I was | getting, more than I needed, to have fun while saving | some money, did my teaching, met my wife, and started | violin -- I liked it! | | Since that was Indiana, that is, out in the Midwest flat | farming country, a lot of the other grad math students | were pretty good athletes. So one afternoon I showed up | at the volley ball game those students held. Soon I was | very much not wanted! I was the last to be _chosen_! And | soon even the other team would make sure I never got to | touch the ball! Those guys took athletics VERY seriously, | much more seriously than the math! | | But in the ugrad teaching, nearly all the girls tried | hard to look pretty and be _sweet_! One course I taught | was some math for elementary education majors. There were | maybe 30 students in the class. There was one boy there, | maybe looking to meet the girls! So, all the rest were | girls. And they had their _career_ direction decided, no | doubt, high determination -- they 'd get a teaching | certificate, a husband, a home, and some babies. NO | DOUBT! And they were just AWFUL at that math, and soon | just terrified of it! Due to the influence of computing, | I had to teach them about base 2 and base 16 -- that was | more painful for them than having their teeth pulled! I | also taught calculus, trigonometry, etc., and in those | courses the girls did fine, no angst! So, there was | _something_ about elementary education majors!!! | throwawayboise wrote: | > As a grad student, since I was teaching ugrad courses, | I got paid, enough actually to live nicely | | When was this? Nowadays the grad students are constantly | complaining that they don't get paid enough to live and | mandatory fees are too high. | lief79 wrote: | Many years ago, I did some tutoring for a friend in | elementary education math. It was sorta neat, in that | they were teaching them different number theories (in | practice some discrete math) and forcing them to learn | how to work with numbers in much the same way their first | students would. It was smart and made a lot of sense when | viewed in this manner. | | The problem was the author of the book had no idea why | they were doing this, or what the purpose of this was. It | provided the curriculum, but had already lost the | inherent reason behind it. | kragen wrote: | That sounds wonderful! Except for the elementary | education majors and the volleyball. Are you still in | touch with people there? | graycat wrote: | "still in touch"? Naw. That was a long time ago! | | The money: I lived with low rent, in a dorm that had the | option of no meals in a university cafeteria. Since I was | teaching, I paid no tuition and, as I remember, paid no | fees. My teaching was a bargain for the university, i.e., | I was no doubt MUCH cheaper per course taught than a | prof. They had me teaching a wide variety of courses and, | one semester, two courses. That wasn't fair to me, but I | didn't mind. | | It was an old dorm, REALLY nice. And it was next to the | music school and, still, not far from the math department | or lots of places to eat. | hardolaf wrote: | My undergraduate degree in ECE at OSU went far more in- | depth on topics and set me up far better than the graduate | programs at Purdue or UIUC do in their first year of | graduate school. A huge part of that is that OSU's ECE | department does not have senior-level courses. They only | have senior/graduate courses. So the seniors are taking | graduate level courses (when I went there, at least 4 were | required to graduate). Also, you list Indiana U? Really? | I'm sorry, but it's second-tier compared to Purdue. | tourist_on_road wrote: | Something to note -- Indiana U doesn't have engineering | stream unlike Purdue. Only thing close to engineering is | computer science and Intelligent systems engineering. | outside1234 wrote: | Right - Indiana splits up subjects across universities so | they can focus money. It is by design that Purdue is the | engineering school and Indiana is the liberal arts | school. | | IU is a great liberal arts school - but doesn't compete | in engineering by design. | kragen wrote: | Purdue has a great reputation but I don't know anything | about it personally except via Eugene Spafford. I may be | biased because I like Scheme -- SICP was a life-changing | epiphany for me, and _Essentials of Programming | Languages_ was also quite revelatory -- and Indiana has | done a lot of inspiring Scheme work. I don 't know of | anything of similar importance from OSU but maybe they're | really great in CPU design or subthreshold logic families | or something? | | As for getting in-depth information on topics, you don't | need a university for that anymore. Library Genesis and | sci-hub has more in-depth information on topics than you | could ever possibly absorb, assuming it's legal in your | country. What universities uniquely offer is community, | financial support, and research: without universities, | sci-hub would be a pretty empty place. | hardolaf wrote: | You're not going to learn electrical and computer | engineering by reading stuff on Sci-Hub. You might get | some knowledge, but so much is just simply never | published that it's essentially tribal knowledge. Heck, | even with professors walking you through every step of | learning the topics, it's hard. | | As for computer architecture, OSU is not heavily into | computer architecture. It's much more focused on custom | accelerators and ASICs as well as semiconductor research. | And it is recognized as one of the best ECE programs in | the world with one of the main problems with it being | that the CS department is comparatively weak. | | My graduating class, in a December, was still over 1,000 | engineers. Spring graduation typically had 2.5-3.5K/yr. | outside1234 wrote: | Purdue is an engineering factory. It is both quality and | quantity. | | There were 1800 engineers in my graduating class (1995). | rxhernandez wrote: | I'm sure there's more great ones in California but I can | count 14 off the top of my head; I think all of them are | nearly within 300 miles of LA too. | | 1. Caltech | | 2. Stanford | | 3. Cal | | 4. UCLA | | 5. Harvey Mudd | | 6. USC | | 7. UCSD | | 8. UCD | | 9. UCSB | | 10. CPSLO | | 11. UCI | | 12. CPP | | 13. UCSC | | 14. UCR | outside1234 wrote: | Caltech, Stanford, Cal, and Harvey Mudd are on the same | tier with Purdue, Michigan, Illinois, CM. | | The other ones are good schools, but in a distinctly second | tier to that group. | rxhernandez wrote: | You think UCLA, USC, and UCSD are second tier? Last I | checked, UCSD is #9 for engineering in the nation, which | is above UIUC at #10. USC is #12 and UCLA is #16 relative | to Columbia at #15, John Hopkins at #17, Harvard at #21, | Princeton at #22, and UW at #22. | | What on earth do you mean by second tier? | adamcstephens wrote: | The other difference, which parent didn't mention, is the | Ohio has plenty of water. | jasonlotito wrote: | I mean, if you are going to count campuses, Penn State has | like 20+ alone. | kragen wrote: | It sounds like maybe you think UCLA and Berkeley are as | closely related as the different campuses of Penn State, | but that is far from the truth. | Bayart wrote: | I know what one of those acronyms means. | mikestew wrote: | If you substitute "University of California" for "UC", | you'll be able to decipher a lot more of them if you know | your California cities. For example, "UCSD" translates to | "UC San Diego". "CP" gets you "California Polytechnical", | but good luck sussing "SLO" unless you've been anywhere | near San Luis Obispo. | mmmBacon wrote: | The problem is not the schools in the Midwest but that many | don't want to live in the Midwest. I am married into a family | from Illinois but they have all left or are leaving because | they are tired of the weather. I also went to grad school in | Illinois and never considered staying after I finished. I did | actually like it but wasn't a place I wanted to stay forever. | | University of Illinois at Urbana Champagne was _the_ pre- | eminent school for Computer Science. It's still a fantastic | school but most don't seem to want to live in a cornfield. | danielvaughn wrote: | Not sure if Colorado counts as midwest but there's also the | School of Mines outside Denver. Very good engineering school. | brewdad wrote: | School of Mines is 1,300 miles from this location. It's not | really relevant compared to the others on the the list. | moralestapia wrote: | My two c, I have been left with a very good impression of | people from Penn State and Michigan State, very talented and | diligent at work. | TheCondor wrote: | With a potential $100b investment, it's not about what they | have now, it's about what will be in 20 years. | | Ohio is a great place for this kind of corporate | gentrification. As a CMU grad, I know there was a collective | desire to get students to stick around, but there was better | lifestyle, more money, etc.. leaving after school and a | fairly large number of us weren't from the area to begin | with. Something like this can be a game changer for the | region, plus, there will be dozens of additional companies | that set up camp and start up there for support. | | If it really works and the region supports it and leans in, | _all_ of the schools anywhere near by will step up their | engineering programs. | NationalPark wrote: | Do chip plants employ many engineers? Seems like they would | mainly need IT and facilities staff. | tyrfing wrote: | Relative to economic output, not really. In absolute | terms, yes, because the plants are massive and | "facilities staff" misses a lot when you're talking about | machines worth 150 million a piece, clean rooms, and | billions in depreciation per year. | quocanh wrote: | From what I understand, a chip plant's workers have PhDs | because when problems arise on the line, they require a | lot of knowledge to fix. | smaddox wrote: | The R&D fab(s) definitely have a high number of PhDs. I | don't know about the production fabs. PhDs will | definitely visit when starting up a new fab or process or | when issues need to be addressed. | s1artibartfast wrote: | If it is anything like BioTech, they will. I was shocked | when I joined a large firm and realized that the person | spending most of their day breaking down boxes and | checking log books has a masters from Berkeley. Most of | the techs running equipment have masters/Phds. | | As I have come to realize, when a mistake or delay costs | $XX million, it often makes sense to hire with high | educational background. I have also come to realize that | your bog standard MS or Phd isn't as talented as you | might think. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | They keep the process parameters within the optimal zone. | That is considerably more complicated than it sounds. | They also work on incremental improvements. | jeffbee wrote: | Ohio has a lot going for it, geographically. It has major pre- | war cities that contain identifiable centers. It has the same | overall population density as Spain. Its major cities could | easily be served by high-speed rail. It has a reliable source | of fresh water. If it weren't for its across-the-board anti- | government slate of elected officials, it could regain its | prominence among the states. | asdff wrote: | The worst thing going for Ohio is the political landscape. An | effort to restart passenger rail with a line from Cleveland | to Akron was killed in the early 2000s, thanks to a small | township of like 2000 people that would have had to hear a | passenger train in addition to the freight rail traffic | currently using the rail line already in place in their back | yard. Regional planning is impossible with such a selfish and | fractured political foundation, not to mention the | gerrymandering done by statehouse republicans that maintains | this state of dysfunction and pushes the state red. | amelius wrote: | For a fab, every US location is probably better than Taiwan. | That's to say: it probably doesn't matter that much where they | put it. | tracker1 wrote: | I'm somewhat concerned for Taiwan though... At least having a | headstart on chip production gives them some cover from those | who would be more likely to step in as China makes strides | towards potential invasion. Could make HK look like a beach | party. | tracker1 wrote: | I think it's more about diversifying locations for labor | pooling... Phoenix is growing and now going to have fabs for | Intel, Samsung and TSMC. I think it's more about hedging or | spreading out the labor pool a bit more and less competition. | | As for location, in terms of shipping, they're probably about | on par to each other. Not sure how stable it is regarding | weather conditions, or natural disaster risk in Ohio vs Arizona | though. | | In either case, it's good to see some uptick in distributed | manufacturing. Concentrating most high technology | infrastructure into a relatively small region has proven a | disaster when problems inevitably happen. | nebula8804 wrote: | A smaller but still important metric....the possibility of | turning it permanently blue? (one can hope) | taylortrusty wrote: | I suspect part of the appeal is it's not permanently blue. | nebula8804 wrote: | People always complain about the downsides of all these | blue areas but at the end of the day there is still a | massive population that continue to live there. For | example: Exodus from California is mainly limited to people | making less than 100k a year. People making more than that | actually increased their population in California. So this | is mainly a rich vs poor issue. I'm excited at the prospect | of transforming some of the rural states into a mindset of | progressivism. It will help prevent some of the gridlock | that is holding back the country from trying big bold | ideas. | tick_tock_tick wrote: | I mean it's pretty much known that rich people can avoid | nearly any consequence intended or unintended of | politicians...... | | It's why people view the ability to ignore politics as a | privilege having the resources to just avoid whatever | they happen to do gives you a massive degree of freedom. | | Also aren't these progressive policies supposed to have | helped people on the lower end of the economic scale | rather then forced them out? | gaoshan wrote: | The Columbus area is blue. Most of the biggest cities in Ohio | are. It's the countryside and rural areas (Ohio has a lot of | small towns) that are deep red. | nebula8804 wrote: | Yes but increased population will increase the number of | blue which tilts the whole state in favor of blue. Yes, | there will be shenanigans(voter intimation, making blue | areas harder to vote) from the red side like we see in | other currently purple states but those tactics become more | ineffective the more blue voters you have so this can only | be a net positive. | [deleted] | destitude wrote: | They are extremely anti-renewable energy though. There was | attempt (not sure if it passed) to make wind turbines illegal. | hguant wrote: | I don't want to say so, but...so? At Intel scale, they're | able to buy carbon offsets or - gasp! - install their own | solar/wind in their properties. The municipal and state | governments are I'm sure bending over backwards to get the | plants and infrastructure investment, a permit to run | whatever solar/wind/renewable they want is probably chump | change for them. | llbeansandrice wrote: | I'll eat a sock if they bother with solar in Ohio. I guess | it's better than nothing but large parts of Ohio just don't | get that much sun. Wind is much more likely. | adamcstephens wrote: | https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/amazon-behind-another- | ohio... | | I doubt socks are tasty, but please let us know. | reportingsjr wrote: | Cincinnati (where I live) is about half a year away from | completing the largest city financed solar array in the | US [0,1]. Ohio gets plenty of sun, in fact it averages | more sun than _anywhere_ in Germany which is known for | it's solar [2,3]. | | In Ohio for residential, which is a good bit more | expensive than commercial/utility scale solar, the | payback period is about 12 years[4], well within the | margin of getting your money back and then some. | | 0: https://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/mayor/news/cincinnati- | to-const... 1: https://newmarketsolar.com/ 2: | https://www.nrel.gov/gis/assets/images/solar-annual- | ghi-2018... 3: https://solargis.com/file?url=download/Ger | many/Germany_PVOUT... 4: | https://www.energysage.com/local-data/solar-panel- | cost/oh/ | tick_tock_tick wrote: | > in Germany which is known for it's solar | | Pretty sure Germany is more know for poor green energy | planning, burning more coal, and instance on non optimal | strategies for power generation (killing nuclear). | Torifyme12 wrote: | Also for managing to be so dependent on Russian gas it | torpedoes a lot of measures to contain them | ct0 wrote: | Sounds more like they are anti turbine. Where does someone | put a turbine when it's at the end of its life? | penneyd wrote: | Where does someone put a coal fired power plant when it's | at the end of its life? | ummonk wrote: | Aren't coal power plants made from recyclable materials | like metal and concrete rather than unrecyclable | composite materials? | bigbillheck wrote: | https://www.eenews.net/articles/volatile-place-new-laws- | thwa... | llbeansandrice wrote: | I think this is due to a lot of money in the region coming | from things like coal and natural gas. There's a _lot_ of | money to be had for folks that just happen to own land that | sits above valuable minerals. | | I've only ever seen billboards for "clean coal" in SE Ohio, | SW PA, and West Virginia. | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | Except there really isn't that much money in Coal - and | Ohio doesn't has little of it anyway. | | Ohio produces 1/20th the coal of WV - which is a much more | economically poor state - and coal isn't even really that | important to WV's economy. Ohio's economy is much more | similar to PA - and PA produces 10x more coal: | https://www.eia.gov/coal/production/weekly/ | | Coal is all politics. | | I mean, it is still used for a lot of energy production - | almost everywhere in the US - Ohio definitely: | https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=OH. | | I'm sure power plants don't want to shut down overnight | because someone bans coal completely - and they shouldn't. | But it's just not economical in most places - the plants | are phasing out naturally almost everywhere. | | The less scale there is with coal - the less viable it | becomes. It's a vicious cycle. | | Power plants naturally phasing out because coal isn't | economical will have almost 0 impact on Ohio. | | Places like WV - that's a different story. WV sells coal! | Ohio doesn't. | | Coal also doesn't employ people like it used to. It employs | 3,000 people in Ohio: https://www.ohiocoal.com/information- | library/history-coal-mi.... That's out of a ~5.4M labor | force: https://www.bls.gov/eag/eag.oh.htm. That's ~0.05% of | the workforce... Even WV is only ~0.15%... | | It's really only important to a few barons who want coal to | stick around long after it's economically viable (the | governor of WV). | umvi wrote: | > extremely low cost of living and a city/region that has more | good restaurants and activities than might be expected | | That's what people said about Salt Lake City and Boise... until | about 5 years ago. Cost of living has skyrocketed since 2017, | housing alone has doubled in price. It doesn't take long for a | low cost of living region to become high cost of living. | Manuel_D wrote: | Cost of living is relative. San Francisco is about 50% more | expensive than Seattle. Which in turn is about 70% higher | than SLC, judging by a quick scan of apartment rents. | asdff wrote: | Cost of living in Columbus is low if you are looking at it | with Coastal city eyes. That being said, its still the most | expensive city in Ohio. Houses in the hot neighborhoods | people write articles about were hitting 700k 6 years ago. | Rents in new apartments are like $1300 for a 1 bedroom. | rmah wrote: | Is $1300/mo supposed to be high? I've seen parking spaces | going for $600/mo where I live. | asdff wrote: | IMO thats high for ohio with the wages seen, considering | you can find studios at that rate or 1br for a few | hundred more in the LA area. | kesslern wrote: | > That being said, its still the most expensive city in | Ohio. | | Yes, because it's the only major city that's growing. | Cleveland, Cincinatti, Toledo, and Dayton are all losing | population year-over-year while Columbus's grows. | asdff wrote: | Just remarking its not entirely cheap. You can move there | and get a job that pays well, but you aren't alone, other | people are going to have well paid jobs too and you will | find the same competitive housing market for decent | neighborhoods that you see in places like Portland or | wherever. Especially when you consider how your full tax | structure works it might not be as much of a deal over | time as CA with prop 13 as your taxes will be reassessed | every few years and if the market climbed, so did your | tax bill. There's probably fewer opportunities to leg up | your earned income to match in a place with less jobs and | smaller network effects like Central Ohio than there is | in major job centers with more options for lateral moves. | 908B64B197 wrote: | I don't get why cost of living is factored at all. | | The biggest expense is typically housing. And if you bought | the house, it means the biggest expense is... building | equity into an asset you can sell afterward. | | Keep in mind the engineer who purchased a 2 million house | in Palo Alto can sell it for two million, and then move to | Ohio to a much cheaper house purchased in cash. The reverse | isn't true. | asdff wrote: | You also pay taxes. But you are right that for the first | movers it will be an easy transition into living | opulantly in Ohio. The same can't be said for the next | generation of workers, who graduate and have no capital | accrued from working at bay area rates, and start their | careers working for these Ohio based employers at Ohio | based salary rates, and since Columbus is experiencing | the same lack of supply issue everywhere growing faces, | this generation are going to find a cutthroat market for | them like the current generation of engineers fleeing 2 | million dollar homes in Palo Alto. | fossuser wrote: | As long as the market is allowed to build housing to meet | demand it's not too bad. | | Main issue in Palo Alto (and to a large extent the rest | of the bay area) is that there's massive population | growth in the bay area, but very little housing is | allowed to be built. This creates artificial scarcity and | the people that bought houses 30yrs ago accrue massive | wealth because of it at the expense of new people (and | the new people that manage to buy at exorbitant rates | also end up paying the majority share of taxes too). | | This is the natural incentive made worse by things like | locked property taxes and rent control. You really need | legislation that allows the market to build (easier said | than done). | 015a wrote: | Also, within "can still drive home every couple months to see | the family" distance of UIUC and Purdue, which are two of the | top ten Electrical Engineering and Computer Science | universities in the US. | Animats wrote: | jnorthrop wrote: | Not to mention low probability of natural disasters: | Earthquakes, tornados, wild fire, hurricanes, etc. | politician wrote: | Access to large amounts of fresh water. | asdff wrote: | You just get different natural disasters. Flooding that could | damage your basement and foundation and prevent you from | accessing certain roads is a regular occurrence, some people | are always pumping out their basements every time it rains. A | bad roof you could get away with in California where it rains | 5 x a year could quickly spiral into more expensive rot and | repairs in places that see heavy rains. Storms can still fall | trees onto your house or car. Snowstorms often don't stop | your employer from demanding your presence in the office or | schools from closing because we are supposedly hardy in the | midwest, and increasingly as the weather gets milder, ice | storms that manifest as rain during the day but dangerous ice | as soon as the sun sets and temperatures fall, coating your | car in an inch thick layer of ice when you leave for work in | the morning. And plus when the west burns up in flames, the | smoke plume wafts east and settles down on the midwest, | giving you the bad air anyhow. Speaking of air quality, if | you have any allergies, the midwest is also not for you. You | get slammed from pollen both from a variety of seasonal | weeds, as well as from the intensive agriculture performed in | the region. | mrfusion wrote: | Low geopolitical risk is probably one of the best factors. | mNovak wrote: | Fun fact, Ohio was supposedly high on the Soviet nuke | target list, because of Wright Patterson AFB, which houses | the Air Force Research Lab (and aliens). | | I have an old Soviet invasion map of central Ohio, marking | all potential airfields etc. | robbintt wrote: | Yep - one of my classrooms in Ohio was in the old fallout | shelter. I saw the signs with radioactive label every | morning going into the building. The location is now | demolished. | paulv wrote: | Same. My high school was very near a GE plant in northern | Cincinnati and I frequently heard how we were a target | because of that. Seems plausible but based on other | comments in this post, it may have just been cold war | propaganda. | s5300 wrote: | We also have a particle accelerator in Southern Ohio, | I've heard it would be on a lower priority tier of things | to nuke/otherwise destroy. Not sure how accurate the | statement was, but I think it was from somewhere credible | enough... | | Wright Patt definitely has some high level stuff stored, | I have a few friends who work engineering there. | inglor_cz wrote: | "old Soviet invasion map" | | Soviets had a concrete plan to invade Ohio? Wow. How were | the troops supposed to cross the ocean? | madengr wrote: | dylan604 wrote: | >How were the troops supposed to cross the ocean? | | The invaders would cross the ocean from an orbital path | streaking in as multiple units launched from submersed | platforms or silos in the Motherland raining down from | heaven. Those invaders would not need to put a single | boot on the ground. | brewdad wrote: | When I was growing up the rumor was that both sides had | enough nukes to destroy the entire earth 10x over. I have | no idea whether that is even close to true but at that | point every city is a target because, why not? | dayofthedaleks wrote: | There's a lot more to it than urban legends. A FEMA | publication[1] from 1990 has a map on page 86 with | assumed Ohio targets. | | Tiny Waverly would have definitely been wiped off the map | because of its fuel refining facility. There's a non-zero | chance I keep my EMP-proof diesel truck running due to | growing up in those times. | | [1] https://www.jumpjet.info/Emergency- | Preparedness/Hazard-Maps/... | PKop wrote: | Do you have a link to this map? | tmp538394722 wrote: | The small town I grew up in also had a specific Soviet | doomsday theory. Which in hindsight, doesn't feel very | plausible. | | In the wake of the George Floyd protests family talked | about their concern that out of state "Antifa looters" | were spotted driving down the interstate headed right for | them. | | I don't mean to call you a liar, Im sure there indeed are | some obscure targets, and your home might be one. | | I do think it's a fascinating phenomenon- this idea of | small town obsession with their own destruction. | | A quote from Terrence Malick's BadLands goes something | like: | | > and if the reds ever do drop the bomb, well I hope they | drop it right here in Rapid City (South Dakota). | [deleted] | xhrpost wrote: | Lol, growing up in Ohio I've heard this same thing but | for various different reasons over the years. Would be | interesting to see an authoritative source if one exists | echelon wrote: | > I have an old Soviet invasion map | | Can you please post this? That sounds so interesting. | dayofthedaleks wrote: | https://www.sovietmaps.com/ | | Also I submitted that link as a fresh thread [1], because | this admittedly fun rabbit hole has little to do with | Intel and Columbus' sprawl. | | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30030346 | Melatonic wrote: | I have a book that is all those old soviet maps - amazing | how detailed they were. All hand drawn and they had | detail down to individual houses and streets. Many time | those maps were more detailed than the ones the US was | making about itself! | asdff wrote: | Low Geopolitical risk but high risk to personal liberties, | especially if you are a woman. Look at Ohio and its slow | decline from purple into red state. Gerrymandered to hell | and back too to prevent this from changing in the | foreseeable future, and a state democratic party that is | powerless against the state republicans who have secured | tenures for life thanks to their inventive mapmaking | processes. Companies move to Ohio because a corrupt | politician offered them a cherry deal on property like this | more often than not. | decremental wrote: | Name exactly one personal liberty afforded to women in | California that is not afforded to women in Ohio. | KerrAvon wrote: | You must not be aware of the ongoing threats to abortion | in Ohio? | | https://www.abortionislegalinohio.com/ | | You can say that it's not technically illegal now, but | it's unquestionably under assault in a way that it's not | and won't ever be in California. | sangnoir wrote: | I was going to say the same as you did: SCOTUS may very | well make the legality of abortion a state-controlled | issue, so that's definitely at risk in Ohio. | tick_tock_tick wrote: | So you're saying maybe in the future there might be an | issue? | | Also plenty of people here want to ban abortion too. Tons | of small counties have managed to prevent any kind of | reproductive health clinics from opening or defacto | forced them to close. | sneak wrote: | Building in a country about to (10-15y) have a civil war | doesn't seem like the best idea, then. | theandrewbailey wrote: | Half of Ohio is flat, and gets lots of storms that blow | through the plains and prairies from the west, so not exactly | low probability of tornadoes. | | Source: I grew up in central Ohio. Public schools made it a | point to practice tornado drills. In addition, there was an | old Cold War-era air raid siren a block from the house I grew | up in that had been repurposed and tested for tornado | warnings. One of these: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9rRSY0dRIU | | Edit: read about Xenia, Ohio: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenia,_Ohio | | > Xenia has a history of severe storm activity. According to | local legend, the Shawnee referred to the area as "the place | of the devil wind" or "the land of the crazy winds" | (depending upon the translation). | | > On April 3, 1974, a tornado rated F5 on the Fujita scale | cut a path directly through the middle of Xenia during the | 1974 Super Outbreak | | > Xenia was struck by an F2 tornado on April 25, 1989, and | again by an F4 tornado on September 20, 2000. | eeeeeeehio wrote: | Even large, damaging tornadoes have quite localized impacts | (max of maybe a mile in path width) -- and you don't | generally do much more than stay up to building code in | order to prepare for one. In contrast, earthquakes | devastate entire areas and require substantial changes to | building construction in order to protect against them. | | The probability of a large, damaging tornado at a | particular spot in Ohio is quite small compared with the | risk of damaging earthquakes in other locations. | https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-probability-earthquake- | will-o... | danielvaughn wrote: | The first thing I thought about was tornados, actually. That | Amazon facility in Missouri was just totally flattened back | in December. Given the cost of manufacturing chips, it seems | like it would be a huge loss if it was hit. | theandrewbailey wrote: | > An initial $20 billion investment - the largest in Ohio's | history - on a 1,000-acre site in _New Albany_ will create 3,000 | jobs | | I grew up just north of there. An Intel factory nearby would be | good news for anyone in the rust belt. I hope this doesn't fizzle | out like Wisconsin's Foxconn plant. | 55873445216111 wrote: | There are always unknowns, but Intel is a much more reliable | partner than Foxconn. The Wisconsin Foxconn deal smelled very | fishy from day 1 IMO. | qsmi wrote: | Does anyone know why Intel would want to build a "mega-site" in | the city of Columbus Ohio? Why not choose Cleveland Ohio where | one has port access with an existing route to Europe? Fabs are | international affairs, no matter where they're rooted, because | just to keep the place running one needs a constant stream of | parts from everywhere. It seems like being in a sea/rail/truck | hub would be a logistics advantage. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Cleveland | | Edit: On second thought, Arizona doesn't have port access either | so I guess it's not really a significant consideration. | MrDunham wrote: | So, I live in Columbus Ohio and I'm friends with two of the top | people in our economic development department the broker this | deal. | | I can't speak well to why not Cleveland but I can say that the | actual city that they chose (New Albany, OH, 25 min to downtown | and 15-20 to the airport) was built by Les Wexner, founder of L | brands/Victoria's Secret, is now home to data centers for | Facebook, Google, and an AWS data center (there are two more | within 30 minutes), and the general metro is one of the fastest | growing regions in the US. | | There is also a ton of available land on the fringes of the | Columbus region and the sheer scope of acreage needed is | bonkers. | yucky wrote: | >Les Wexner | | Didn't Epstein have some sort of exclusive investor | relationship with Wexner? I seem to recall that was where he | got his start. | timr wrote: | Yes. He also had a home in New Albany. | MrDunham wrote: | I don't know the exact details but I have heard that | Epstein is a big reason that Les is not CEO anymore. | timr wrote: | > was built by Les Wexner | | I grew up near there. I guess I wouldn't quibble with the | idea that Wexner "built" New Albany -- since it definitely | isn't the same anymore -- but it _was_ a town before he came | along (two roads and a farm supply store, basically). | | I used to go to summer camp at the old New Albany HS, and got | my pickup truck stuck in the mud there many, many times while | doing some odd job or another. | newhotelowner wrote: | I am in Columbus Ohio. | | Columbus Ohio is one of the fastest growing city in the USA and | MidWest. Population growth is high too. A lot of people from | other Ohio cities are moving to Columbus Ohio. | https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus-among-fastest... | | Ohio State University is very close to this site. | | Huge immigration population with a science degree. | | Columbus is within 600 miles of 60 percent of American | population. | | A lot of cheap farm land outside of Columbus area. | | > Cleveland Ohio where one has port access with an existing | route to Europe | | Port is less than 2 hrs from this site. | justin66 wrote: | > Why not choose Cleveland Ohio where one has port access with | an existing route to Europe? | | Don't most chips travel internationally by air? | long_time_gone wrote: | > Does anyone know why Intel would want to build a "mega-site" | in the city of Columbus Ohio? | | My guess would be access to talent and costs. Columbus is more | than 2x bigger than Cleveland. Building cars is also an | international affair and we see those plants all over the | place. | dtwest wrote: | Columbus metro area is roughly the same size as Cleveland | metro area so I don't think that is the reason. | | However, it could still have a talent advantage. Having OSU | nearby is helpful, and maybe it is easier to attract talent | to move to a city with a big university. | HelloMcFly wrote: | Columbus grew 15% in the last decade, Cleveland shrank 6%. | That could also have something to do with as there's reason | to believe it will continue to attract skilled talent. | hardolaf wrote: | You don't need skilled talent to operate fabs. You need | people who can go through a 2 year degree program. | MrDunham wrote: | > Building cars is also an international affair and we see | those plants all over the place | | I moved from the Bay Area to Columbus Ohio and, funny enough, | there's a Honda factory about 30 minutes outside of downtown | and 45 from the airport. | theandrewbailey wrote: | Yup, Honda has a big plant in Marysville, in the next | county to the northwest. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marysville_Auto_Plant | MrDunham wrote: | Correct. | | On a side note, counties here a little bit wonky. I live | in Dublin which is about 20 minutes out of Marysville. | | If you live in Dublin you could be living in one of THREE | counties | m3kw9 wrote: | Probably trucking it for 1 day isn't a big deal | MrDunham wrote: | Having moved to Columbus a couple years ago everyone loved to | say that over 60% of the US population is within a one day | drive of Columbus. | | For the Bay Area readers the distance from Cleveland to | Columbus is roughly the same as San Francisco to Sacramento | asdff wrote: | It's hard to understate just how driveable this side of the | country is from Ohio. In about 7 hours one direction you | are in Chicago. 7 hours another direction you are in | Toronto. 7 hours another direction you are in NYC, or DC, | or Boston. Stretch it to 15 hours or so and you can drive | all the way to New Orleans, or most of Florida in that | time, and anywhere in between. Anywhere east of the | Mississippi really is seemingly doable for a road trip in | about a days drive, especially if you are driving in | shifts. You can get flights pretty fast as well, but the | issue is the ohio airports have limited direct connections; | its frequent to fly to ohare or charlotte first. It's not | like LAX where you can score a direct flight to half the | western US from southwest for $59. | selimthegrim wrote: | >Stretch it to 15 hours or so and you can drive all the | way to New Orleans | | Having done this, I would recommend it only in urgency | daemoens wrote: | Much less congestion as well. I drive between them weekly | and rarely see traffic anywhere close to California. It's a | pretty comfortable 2 hour drive. | asdff wrote: | Highways do back up in Cleveland and Columbus in the | cities during rush hour though, as well as when there is | any construction or accidents or inclimate weather. | | One thing I noticed is that the freeways in, say, | Cleveland, are all 5 lanes wide or so in each direction, | serving a population of 400k in the city and 1.2m in the | county. You go to LA and what do you see? The same size | freeways as Cleveland, 5 lanes wide or so, only its | serving a city of 4 million and a county of 15 million. | It's like, of course there is no congestion in Cleveland | and tons of congestion in LA, it doesn't take a rocket | scientist to see an issue with capacity. There's | literally an order of magnitude more people using the | same capacity of infrastructure. | 7952 wrote: | It has an international airport, intermodal rail freight depot | and interstate highways. | | I would guess that raw materials can be transported by road or | rail. Access to a waterway is sometimes needed for very heavy | indivisible parts (not sure if this is commons for fabs) but | that is unlikely to be a regular occurrence. Just drive it down | the interstate with a police escort at 2am. | cududa wrote: | Plus Lake Erie gives you access to the Atlantic. Port of | Cleveland got a huge update 10+ years ago and is still only | used at about 7% capacity | nwiswell wrote: | > needed for very heavy indivisible parts (not sure if this | is commons for fabs) | | It is not common. Semiconductor equipment is generally | designed to be sent via air freight and assembled on site. | | Some of the supporting operations (water and air purification | plants, on-site chemical production, LN2 production, etc) may | require some large parts but that's a case-by-case basis and | probably avoidable. | [deleted] | qsmi wrote: | I am pretty shocked but I guess ASML delivers by 747. [1][2] | But they do seem to know what they're doing. :) | | "The current generation of EUV machines are already, to put | it bluntly, kind of bonkers. Each one is roughly the size of | a bus and costs $150 million. It contains 100,000 parts and 2 | kilometers of cabling. Shipping the components requires 40 | freight containers, three cargo planes, and 20 trucks." | | [1] https://technical-news.net/euv-lithography-asml- | delivers-100... [2] https://www.wired.com/story/asml-extreme- | ultraviolet-lithogr... | bduerst wrote: | >Amid the recent chip shortage, triggered by the pandemic's | economic shock waves, ASML's products have become central | to a geopolitical struggle between the US and China, with | Washington making it a high priority to block China's | access to the machines. The US government has successfully | pressured the Dutch not to grant the export licenses needed | to send the machines to China, and ASML says it has shipped | none to the country. | | Fascinating | [deleted] | totalZero wrote: | New Albany is a suburb of the capital of the third most active | manufacturing state in the US. Intel is courting the federal | government for direct semiconductor industry support that goes | beyond tax breaks on semiconductor fabrication equipment. | | > Edit: On second thought, Arizona doesn't have port access | either so I guess it's not really a significant consideration. | | From a pure logistics perspective, I'd say that Arizona beats | Ohio. BNSF connects Arizona with both the Pacific Ocean and the | Gulf of Mexico. (Not to mention Lake Michigan.) It's impossible | to drive Route 66 from California to Texas without rolling | alongside extensive trains hauling cargo through the desert. | | For me, the trains are one of the most scenic aspects of that | drive. | | LAX is the eighth-busiest air cargo terminal in the world, and | it has plenty of cargo flights to Asia where computer devices | are often assembled. PHX is also one of the busiest cargo | airports in the United States, albeit much less so than LAX or | CVG. | | Fabs have massive physical plant inputs (eg. lithography | machines), substantial commoditized manufacturing inputs (eg. | boules/wafers, freshwater, industrial gas), and core outputs | with small size and high value (ie. chips). The former two can | be pipelined without knowing the exact product-by-product | breakdown of customer demand, and the latter cannot. | | Infrastructure and labor concerns might also tip the scales one | way or another. Water supply, wastewater management, energy | cost, grid resiliency, labor supply, access to institutions for | professional training, and other considerations can differ | wildly between the two regions. | asdff wrote: | Port of Cleveland is not a big container port like you'd | imagine using for consumer goods. It's for supporting industry, | mostly steel, through moving commodities. Think a big open | barge full of coal, and holding facilities for limestone or | iron ore. There's probably a limit to the size of the sort of | ship can navigate to the port of Cleveland as well, you | definitely can't fit a huge cargo ship in that port. | dayofthedaleks wrote: | Yep, the constraints of the St. Lawrence Seaway mean we get | the cutest little container vessels every couple of weeks | from Europe. Sometimes they have a portion of the deck set | aside for windmill parts. | | Presumably this plant will be trucking containers to | Baltimore's port or sending air freight out of the cargo-only | airport nearby. | bigbillheck wrote: | I have in-laws in the Columbus area and have visited there | several times. | | You might be able to pay us to live there, but it would have to | be 'retire after a year' kind of money. It has all the charm of a | strip mall. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-21 23:00 UTC)