[HN Gopher] Danish government makes its new economic model open ... ___________________________________________________________________ Danish government makes its new economic model open source Author : HumanReadable Score : 383 points Date : 2022-01-21 17:19 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (github.com) (TXT) w3m dump (github.com) | gunfighthacksaw wrote: | futharkshill wrote: | An actual belief in this is ridiculous, and taking light on | literal war and anti democratic effort and meme'ing it as | "freedomed" is absolutely disgusting. You know that these are | real human beings we are talking about right? | gunfighthacksaw wrote: | Oh wow, someone getting upset and moralistic at black humour. | I've never seen this episode before. | | No, the real joke is that the US 'freedomed' a democratically | elected socialist government and replaced them with a 'pro- | freedom' dictator with the full support of other western | countries, as they have done multiple times before. | stusherwin wrote: | An actual belief in what is ridiculous? | salt-thrower wrote: | I think that's part of the (dark) joke - "freedom" being the | reason that the United States always gives before | destabilizing a region and propping up corrupt dictators or | puppet democracies which are anything but "free." | whimsicalism wrote: | You entirely misread the comment. | lucian1900 wrote: | The US decided to Chicago all of Chile because of what they did | with Cybersyn: workers nationalising industry and planning | production centrally. | | Denmark will be fine. | boppo1 wrote: | I don't understand the use of Chicago as a verb, can you | help? Also, do we explicitly know it was the US, or just | implicitly? | guerrilla wrote: | They're referring to the CIA assisted fascist coup where | the Chicago Boys "ran" the economy afterward using it as a | place to experiment with their ideology. | | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Boys | | 2. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d'%C3%A9tat | lucian1900 wrote: | I guess the Chicago police murdering black communists | fits too, although I hadn't thought of that initially. | boppo1 wrote: | Thank you. | SuoDuanDao wrote: | Thanks for the explanation, I interpreted as 'Chicago'd' | as a reference to the city of Chicago's high violent- | crime rate. | [deleted] | aliceryhl wrote: | What actually happened to them? It is unclear to me how this | could harm Denmark. | zardo wrote: | A CIA assisted fascist coup followed by tens of thousands of | murders by the new government to secure power. | | Not to say that's a good model for Denmark in 2022, but | that's what happened in Chile in 1973. | SuoDuanDao wrote: | And the coup that ended the experiment happened on Sept. | 11. As Shakespear had his characters say, If this were | played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an | improbable fiction. | decebalus1 wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cybersyn | | "The system was most useful in October 1972, when about | 40,000 striking truck drivers blocked the access streets | that converged towards Santiago. The strike was supported | by the Patria y Libertad group and at least partly funded | by private donors who had received money from the CIA.[5] | According to Gustavo Silva (executive secretary of energy | in CORFO), the system's telex machines helped organize the | transport of resources into the city with only about 200 | trucks driven by strike-breakers, lessening the potential | damage caused by the 40,000 striking truck drivers" | | Fascinating stuff. | | Afterwards, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup | _d%27%C3%A9ta... happened, to prove to the whole world how | badly democratic socialism works. | encryptluks2 wrote: | [deleted] | kasperni wrote: | This model is supposed to replace the existing macro model | cmoonly used in Denmark - ADAM (Annual Danish Aggregate Model)[1] | which has been continuously developed and refined since 1970. You | can find the yearly updates back to 1999 here. | | [1] https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/nyheder-analyser- | publ/Publik... [2] https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/ADAM/Modellen- | ADAM/Download | daxuak wrote: | I bet there has to be better solutions than github. | [deleted] | mkmk3 wrote: | Perfect is the enemy of good. Sure there is, though the most | popular alternative (Gitlab, from where I'm seated) IPO'd | recently, and we know the effect that tends to have. Our | national governments are already pretty comfortable with | Microsoft products. | | Do you know any other git hosts that have persistently proven | themselves trustworthy and have superior financial incentives? | Otherwise it might be better to focus on the meat of this post | Arnavion wrote: | I'd be happy to focus on the meat of the post, but for | completeness, the answer to your question is "The one you run | yourselves." | [deleted] | m00dy wrote: | Turkish Government needs to take a look at this. | sshine wrote: | Do you mean the Turkiye government? ;) | | (Reference to the recent news item that Erdogan made a public | statement in which he renamed Turkey to Turkiye in English.) | [deleted] | throwawayboise wrote: | Do countries get to declare how their names are spelled in | other languages? | xunn0026 wrote: | Excuse me? Of course! Do people get to declare their name | and pronoun? | mortehu wrote: | If that's your whole reasoning I think "of course!" is an | overstatement. | throwawayboise wrote: | So Germany really decided that its name in English is | "Germany" and not "Deutchland"? | | I always assumed those names originated externally. | zhoujianfu wrote: | I'm pretttttty sure it originates locally! Why would the | U.S. tell China to call us "Meiguo", and why would China | listen? | cs702 wrote: | Wow, cool! The model is specified as a constrained nonlinear | optimization problem for which a solution is found using high- | quality proprietary numerical solvers.[a] All partial | differential equations specifying the model have a basis in | economic theory or in heuristics and approximations shown to be | consistent with reality. Parameters come directly from (what I | assume is a large amount of) economic data collected by the | Danish government. | | The authors working for the Danish government deserve an A+ for | making their code and assumptions public, along with | comprehensive high-quality documentation.[b] It was a delightful | surprise to click on the link and find... a carefully curated | repo. | | I have only one nitpicking: This looks like the kind of project | that should have been -- and in fact _probably should be_ -- | implemented in Julia, instead of in a proprietary language. I | suspect many heuristics and approximations could be more | accurately modeled by ML components, interspersed between | equations, as has long been proposed by Julia folks like Chris | Rackauckas. | | -- | | [a] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30028188 | | [b] https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/DREAM- | DK/MAKRO/mai... | MAKROmaker wrote: | Thanks! Julia was not even in 1.0 when we started the project, | but would absolutely be a great choice today. So far, only the | Conopt4 solver can solve our model, which means we have to go | through GAMS even if we rewrite in Julia. I saw Rackauckas' | JuliaCon presentation where he talks about ML approximations | and immediately got excited too. | sandGorgon wrote: | What is your opinion of this vs Gurobi ? | | The only reason I ask is because your model is written in a | proprietary language. While Gurobi models are written in | Python (and solved by the silver). | | Just curious if you found it not effective. | jlouis wrote: | My guess is that the non-linearity of the problem might | make it harder for something like Gurobi to solve. GAMS is | essentially a frontend for solvers, so you are compiling | your input source into a format suitable for an underlying | solver or a set thereof. | cs702 wrote: | Thank you. That makes sense. Also, I fully get why you're | excited: The use of "learnable components" for selectively | replacing heuristics in models like yours seems like an ideal | use case for Julia. (To me it looks like the future of | modeling.) | k2enemy wrote: | FYI, the New York Fed's model is written in Julia and also open | source. | | https://github.com/FRBNY-DSGE/DSGE.jl | erdos4d wrote: | I wonder if this includes Christiania, the billion Euros of | cannabis sold there each year, and the big lift all those drug | tourists impart on the local service industry. Beautiful place by | the way, would recommend. | futharkshill wrote: | Why is it that all weed enthusiasts always believe that MJ has | any relevance to the, in this case Danish, economy? The amount | of MJ use in Denmark is minimal compared to other countries, | and certainly there is no where near "billions" of Euros sold. | Certainly "drug tourists" make little to no impact on the | tourism of Copenhagen. | simonklitj wrote: | Maybe drug tourism has little impact, but 24% of adolescents | report that they've used it in the past year, and 41% report | they've tried it. With it being illegal, there's no doubt | that a fair amount of money is being moved around society | shadily because of it. | | Source (from 2015): https://www.dst.dk/da/informationsservice | /blog/2015/12/narko... | harles wrote: | It's probably still less than what an average adolescence | spends on burgers. | simonklitj wrote: | I think that's true. | hjort-e wrote: | Christiania is like the least beautiful place in the country... | throwawayboise wrote: | Yeah it's a dump. I traveled there a few years ago with a | buddy who was very excited to visit Christiania, like it was | the key thing he wanted to do on the whole trip. He came away | pretty disappointed. | petre wrote: | I agree. We went to the Louisiana Museum of Modern Art and | walked from the station. The surroundings are stunning. Rural | Denmark looks really nice. Christiania not so much. A lot of | dubious looking people in the station. At least they didn't | attempt to sell us drugs, maybe thanks in part to Danish | culture. | riverdweller wrote: | Great initiative, but I must ask: is the Greek compound formed | from makro and gamy entirely accidental? Because it describes the | past twenty years quite accurately. | bigcat123 wrote: | mediocregopher wrote: | This is amazing! Whether or not every aspect of it is fully open- | source, this is a great step forward towards governments being | more transparent about how decisions are being made, and citizens | being directly able to make positive contributions to that | process. | KingMachiavelli wrote: | Does this contain the land value tax formulas or is this much | higher level than individual property taxes? | em500 wrote: | Note that the model is implemented in GAMS[1], a proprietary | language focused at constrained optimization problems (think | Matlab, but more niche). This makes it a non-starter for most | interested outsiders. | | [1] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Algebraic_Modeling_Sys... | mountainriver wrote: | Wow now I'm a fan of Denmark! This is the future of government! | Guthur wrote: | Soon they'll have our entire lives modelled out for us. Know | what we'll be useful for, optimise to give us exactly what we | need and nothing more. What could possibly go wrong. | [deleted] | TIPSIO wrote: | Just now? Denmark is an interesting country for programming and | technology education / discovery: | | https://www.quora.com/What-is-it-about-Denmark-that-many-wel... | ricksunny wrote: | Great! Are you familiar with the economic simulation work | Threadneedle under Jacky Mallett in Iceland? | | https://github.com/jackymallett/Threadneedle | dflock wrote: | This is fantastic! | | I'm not qualified to make any, but are you expecting/hoping | for/accepting pull requests? | MAKROmaker wrote: | Not expecting any, and the model is probably too complicated | for outsiders to make substantial changes. But anyone is | welcome and if the request is good I see no reason why we would | not try to incorporate it. | mbar84 wrote: | Economics is not a science like physics. We can't do controlled | experiments, we can't falsify hypothesis. This leads to very | muddy waters and what you are left with are two kinds of | economists: Those who tell people what they want to hear and | those nobody listens to. | | Econometrics gives people everything they want to hear, and with | a scientific veneer as a bonus. The HN crowd should however | appreciate how susceptible this is to the tyranny of metrics. | Claude-Frederic Bastiat warned of this over a century ago with | his parable of the broken window: Think not only of what you can | see (the glazier who is employed to repair the window), but also | of what you cannot see (the alternative purchase of a suit) had | the window not been broken. | dkga wrote: | First issue: "This is too cool to be true! #1" | | Nice! Kudos to DREAM! | dane-pgp wrote: | I've often wondered whether the first super-intelligent AI that | gets created, if it somehow manages to be both under government | control and not put to strictly military uses, might be tasked | with modelling the economy and deciding on the "correct" set of | economic policies. | | Extending the scope of AI decision-making outside of the realm of | economics seems much harder, though, as there's much less | training data for questions like how to educate students in a | pandemic, or whether to loosen planning rules for building wind | turbines. | | I suspect that before AI becomes capable of providing good | answers to those questions, it will already have changed the | world beyond recognition, and probably not in a good way. The | best we can hope for is mass unemployment and a UBI, which will | also make all economic models obsolete too. | lifeisstillgood wrote: | Isaac Asimov thought so too :-) | ddesotto wrote: | THIS is the way. | | It is a step forward in transparency (even though 90% of danes | probably don't understand a thing of what was published) which is | something no one I know is opposed to. | | Hope this sets a precedent for other countries to follow! | hazza_n_dazza wrote: | I guess the way is to verify and check the model over the | coming years against the open data which initiated it... so | we'll see :) these things can get quite chaotic when taking | externalities into account. | infogulch wrote: | I bet studying this would be a good graduate-level economics | course project. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-21 23:00 UTC)