[HN Gopher] Alphabet's Calico has begun trials on a molecule for... ___________________________________________________________________ Alphabet's Calico has begun trials on a molecule for neurovegetative diseases Author : joak Score : 124 points Date : 2022-01-21 18:19 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (aspenbraininstitute.org) (TXT) w3m dump (aspenbraininstitute.org) | forgotmyoldacc wrote: | No surprise, there's already a subreddit dedicated to people | trying out this experimental molecule: https://reddit.com/r/isrib | mtsr wrote: | You should probably link to https://old.reddit.com/r/isrib | instead, which doesn't block mobile users that don't use the | official app. | dharmaturtle wrote: | I use Sync on Android. You can make reddit links open there | by long pressing on the app icon and making sure the links | are setup to open there. https://imgur.com/a/4qKCgSB | cma wrote: | Sharing this slows down the web 0.0 movement reddit, twitter, | and instagram are pioneering. | dragonwriter wrote: | Isn't it Web 1.5-ish? E.g., we have browsers but devs | aren't satisfied with them as app platforms, so they use | various techniques (in "original" web 1.5, applets or | plugins or downloading a file that would be opened by a | native app) to use web links to trigger running an app in a | native, or at least more-to-the-devs-liking, environment | rather than using web-native tech? | cma wrote: | I assumed they just want notifcation permissions to spam | people that don't know how to turn it off, so they can | hijack their attention, and location permissions to make | their ads more valuable through spying. | cheschire wrote: | The World Wide Dots, rather than web. | comrh wrote: | It's pretty shocking to me people are so willing to experiment | on themselves with some research chemical that has mostly | studied in mice. | colechristensen wrote: | Eh, people have different risk appetites and not everybody | wants to wait for an authority figure to say something is | safe (especially when that authority figure is always slow, | sometimes makes mistakes, and sometimes makes decisions based | on politics). I don't fault people with a little self- | experimentation as long as they're given the opportunity to | understand the risks and rewards they're facing. | Suchos wrote: | Desperate people will do whatever they can to improve | themselves. Imagine you have neurogenerative disease and in | few years you will be stuck to wheelchair forever. | somesortofthing wrote: | Maybe they're in particularly desperate situations? I do | concur if these people are healthy/young though, seems insane | to take something with side effects this concerning that | don't even need proper trials to manifest if you're not | working to fix a preexisting problem that hurts your | lifespan/quality though. | joak wrote: | Excerpts: "the molecule was licensed by Calico Labs, the Silicon | Valley biotech established by the founders of Google to find | drugs based on the biology of aging" | | " In February, Calico announced that human safety trials had | begun on the first drug candidate for neurodegenerative diseases | it had developed based on the molecule, and that a study in ALS | patients was slated to begin later this year. Other possible | drugs for Parkinson's disease and traumatic brain injury are | likely to follow." | boppo1 wrote: | Did the people dumping ice on their heads contribute in any | material way? | xibalba wrote: | I imagine some number of them endured brain damage as part of | the increasingly acrobatic nature of that "challenge". So | maybe they will be downstream beneficiaries to the extent | this drug's development advances the field of neural | regeneration. | sp332 wrote: | $220 million, which funded research that discovered a third | gene usable as a target for new therapies. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Bucket_Challenge#Impact | amatecha wrote: | QuercusMax wrote: | At least two, including Verily. Google Research also does a lot | of health research - I work in a group called Health AI. | [deleted] | elwell wrote: | I thought this post was good news? | amatecha wrote: | Yeah, the research itself sounds excellent and this is indeed | good news. The fact the biotech firm is a subsidiary of | possibly the premier proprietor of surveillance capitalism is | fairly concerning to me. I don't personally want a supercorp | that sees dystopian sci-fi as an instruction manual to be | developing medical treatments. | Guest42 wrote: | I'd be concerned about the ethics they apply to health | products given the changes that have happened over the years | with search, email, and android. | xvector wrote: | It's absurd to complain about this when they are one of the | few institutions working on fighting aging, arguably the | most important problem humanity has ever faced. | amatecha wrote: | Yeah, it sounds great now. There's no way I want a | multinational corp with unprecedented vision into our | private lives also researching and producing medical | treatments. | Jensson wrote: | Why would that be a problem? If they can user their ad- | money to help cure people how is that a bad thing? | Guest42 wrote: | I think the incremental ROI they would need to involve | themselves in a new area would be pretty high. They | aren't going to dedicate a 9-10 digit sum to anything | without expecting a much higher sum in return. | Jensson wrote: | Google started a lot of "moonshot" projects, expensive | things that are very unlikely to produce any returns. | This is one of those. If Google didn't fund this then | this work wouldn't get done. Now it might look promising, | but this is a 8 year old part of Google, they have been | working for a while now. | xvector wrote: | This kind of armchair criticism is really frustrating to | see. Here, you have a company tackling arguably the most | important and devastating problem humanity has ever | faced. At least they are doing _something_ that helps | humanity solve aging, where almost no one else is. | | Who cares if it's capitalist-driven? It's not like | governments don't, or never, had the opportunity to | attempt to tackle the same problem - they simply never | took it, focusing on the trivial day-to-day issues, while | overwhelmed with bureaucratic tape. And it's not like | nonprofits attempting to solve the same problem don't | exist either (https://www.sens.org/, | https://www.lifespan.io/), with limited success. A | massive financial juggernaut backing this initiative is | exactly what it needs. | | What other solution do you propose? | formvoltron wrote: | According to the Huberman podcast, simply elevating your legs at | night can improve the glymphatic system's ability to clear out | junk from our brains. I haven't been able to find any links to | actual studies on that though. | theunixbeard wrote: | Wouldn't it be elevating your head, rather than your legs? Most | sources I've seen[1] that discuss inclining your bed have your | head be higher up than your legs. | | [1]: https://www.google.com/search?q=incline+your+bed | jmcgough wrote: | I think you mean neurodegenerative diseases, not neurovegetative? | joak wrote: | Oops, yes, you are right. I failed to notice a wrong | "autocorrection" from the virtual keyboard on my phone. | | It is neurodegenerative disease... But now the title is locked: | I cannot edit it anymore. | | Thanks | darawk wrote: | Feel like I was just reading a comment on here today, in another | thread, about how those stupid Google billionaires wasted all | their money on this dumb Calico thing that will never amount to | anything. | transitory_pce wrote: | Jaw dropping molecule supremacy breakthrough | vmception wrote: | neurovegetative? is that what we're doing now? | | its like something I would say in my comedy skit before doing a | Bill Burr style impression of someone on life support before | insulting the audience for laughing. and then complain that | everyone's too sensitive. | joak wrote: | My mistake... I meant neurodegenerative. | bostonsre wrote: | Why is the word so bad? Not sure if it's a real word or not, | but it seems apt. Someone that is brain dead is referred to as | someone in a vegetative state and someone that has some neurons | that ceased to function could maybe be referred as | neurovegetative. But that kind of makes it sound like the | person is completely brain dead. Maybe partial neurovegatative | state would be better? | vmception wrote: | Only because its made up when we already have a word for it. | Its not toooo bad since it conveys a particular state of | neurodegeneration. | pvarangot wrote: | This is the molecule: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISRIB | dekhn wrote: | Nice symmetry. | paxys wrote: | I'm curious why it is referred to as "molecule" everywhere. It | may be a molecule, but...so is everything else. This is the first | time I have seen this term used to describe a drug or treatment. | mft_ wrote: | It's standard terminology in the pharma world. | ozzy6009 wrote: | There is a distinction in drug development between the | biologics (large proteins, e.g. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adalimumab, molecular weight | ~144kDa), and small molecules | | https://www.nuventra.com/resources/blog/small-molecules-vers... | ALittleLight wrote: | Atoms aren't molecules. | engineer_22 wrote: | I laughed out loud. | CoastalCoder wrote: | I'm curious as well. Maybe it's only a "drug" after they've | combined the active ingredient with specific fillers, buffers, | etc.? | xiphias2 wrote: | Calico has a very strange pipeline of drugs that don't have much | in common. The last paper about Yamamaca factors looked quite | interesting, but Altos is much more focused on understanding just | that one technology. Other successful new companies are platform | companies, which Calico isn't. | sangnoir wrote: | > Calico has a very strange pipeline of drugs that don't have | much in common | | Aren't they all related to fighting the effects of aging, which | is the company mission? | | I've observed that when some people have solved their money | problems, the next challenge they face is their own aging and | mortality - so they try to solve for that too. | wantsanagent wrote: | *Yamanaka | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinya_Yamanaka | manmal wrote: | ISRIB (the molecule discussed in the article) seems _very_ | promising for brain health. But people who (recklessly?) self- | experimented with it had strange cardiac issues. A study on dogs | discovered heart anomalies. It's nicely summarized here: | https://forums.phoenixrising.me/threads/isrib-to-treat-me-cf... | bpodgursky wrote: | If we pair ISRIB with pig heart transplants it's a side-effect | free way to boost cognitive function though. | sdenton4 wrote: | Open heart surgery - let alone replacement - isn't likely to | be side effect free in our lifetime. A detached sternum is | also a side effect, after all, requiring a couple months to | recover to basic function... | jac241 wrote: | Totally side effect free if we ignore the risk of stroke from | cardiopulmonary bypass (at least 0.5%), infection of the | chest cavity (0.5-3% incidence of mediastinitis after median | sternotomy), anesthesia complications, post op pulmonary | embolism, pneumonia, UTI, etc. | meowface wrote: | I think that's the joke. | bostonsre wrote: | I guess it depends on how long the bad effects on the heart | last after taking ISRIB. If it keeps lingering, you may need | new pig hearts over time. Or.. Just keep taking ISRIB and | just schedule a yearly pig heart transplant. | redisman wrote: | Sounds very cyber punk. | manmal wrote: | Perhaps a similar molecule can be found instead which does | not have this problem. Or another compound can be added to | prevent heart damage. | bpodgursky wrote: | It's probably going to be interpreted as cynical b/c it's | HN but I do honestly believe that solving heart function | will be lot easier than solving cognitive decline, and a | win on cognitive decline is huge news (hopefully not paired | with not pig hearts, but it's a reasonable proof of | concept). | PragmaticPulp wrote: | I was debating whether or not to post some of those self- | experiments. | | I'm aware of a couple more forums where people tried ISRIB and | still claim to have lasting problems from it. One group was led | by professional chemists who seemed like they knew what they | were doing when it comes to testing and validating the product | was pure. | | It's amazing what people can access now, but self- | experimentation with these compounds is a terrible idea. | meowface wrote: | Reminds me a bit of cerebrolysin self-experiments I've read. | It can either permanently make you smarter or permanently | give you brain damage. Or both, perhaps. | | (For anyone unaware, it's a bunch of neuropeptides harvested | from pig brains that you typically either inject or - | fittingly, due to the source - snort directly into your brain | through your nose.) | treeman79 wrote: | Developed a weird dementia at 39. Doctors Spent 2 years | trying every prescription drug they could think of. Almost | everything made matters worse. In some cases drastically. | Complete nightmare. Those are with approved ones. Scary to | try experiential. | | Eventually learned it was a blood disorder and a simple blood | thinner was the answer. | tomComb wrote: | > It's amazing what people can access now, but self- | experimentation with these compounds is a terrible idea. | | I think it depends what the alternative is. If you have | something like Alzheimer's and no other alternatives, maybe | self-experimentation is not such a bad idea. | meowface wrote: | Wow, that sounds pretty incredible. Part of what makes it sound | promising to me is the extent of the "no free lunch" aspect: | anecdotal reports of not just cardiac issues in humans and dogs | but increased brain fog (mitigated with feed consumption...?), | blunted emotions, inability to get drunk (maybe a plus?), | accelerated cell death, psychosis and hallucinations - in | exchange for, allegedly, reversing Alzheimer's and repairing | lifelong brain damage: | | >One report of a person who gave ISRIB to their grandmother who | had terminal stage Alzheimer's. She began to remember everyone. | But died after 4 months (this may have been from old age and | her type 1 diabetes). | | >One anecdotal report of a short course of ISRIB permanently | fixing some prefrontal cortex brain damage in a Russian guy, | caused by a car crash when he was a child. The repair to the | brain was confirmed by MRI scans taken before and after the | ISRIB treatment. | | Plus a pretty clear mechanism of action. Definitely sounds like | it's worth significant study. | joak wrote: | Excerpt : "The molecule has restored memory formation in mice | months after traumatic brain injuries and shown potential in | treating neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's, | Parkinson's, and Lou Gehrig's disease (also known as amyotrophic | lateral sclerosis, or ALS)." | whatshisface wrote: | "In the 1980s and 1990s, Walter demonstrated that when too many | unfolded or misfolded proteins--which are characteristic of | neurodegenerative diseases--were detected inside a cell, it | triggered the equivalent of an emergency shutoff switch that | halted all protein construction until the problem was solved. The | action, which Walter dubbed the "unfolded protein response," was | akin to a blaring red alert at a busy worksite, stopping work; | cellular repair crews would then converge on the site, attempt to | fix the problem, and if all else failed, eventually order the | cell to commit suicide." | | So... if the body will naturally restart protein production when | the problem is resolved, and if ISRIB forces it to restart | without solving the problem... | | Is this going to result in a few months of improved performance | followed by a collapse as cells start dying for good? | dpratt wrote: | I'm sure that a biotech company infused with the same ethics and | sense of stewardship and social responsibility as Google can only | work out perfectly. | all2 wrote: | This is fair commentary for any under-regulated industry. I say | that as a staunch "stay out of my business" conservative. | Proper regulation ensures that companies are financially vested | in the well-being of those they affect. | | Whether or not pharma in the US is properly regulated to ensure | the well-being of their consumers is... debatable. | ryan93 wrote: | Are they forcibly injecting you? This is for people with | desperate symptoms who are willing to take on more risk. I have | no opinion on its efficacy fwiw. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-21 23:00 UTC)