[HN Gopher] The Dangers of Dimethylmercury (2019)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Dangers of Dimethylmercury (2019)
        
       Author : caaqil
       Score  : 54 points
       Date   : 2022-01-22 15:51 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.chemistryworld.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.chemistryworld.com)
        
       | JoeyBananas wrote:
       | > OSHA fined Dartmouth $9,000 (PS6890) for what it considered the
       | institution's failure to provide adequate caution, particularly
       | about the shortcomings of disposable latex gloves.
       | 
       | I would think that PhD. chemists would be responsible for buying
       | their own PPE. Also $9,000 is such a weirdly small number
        
         | vmception wrote:
         | And everyone's guidance was wrong at the time, so it doesnt
         | make sense.
         | 
         | OSHA used the opportunity to make a statement that wouldnt be
         | fought, compared to if they tried this with a much higher fine.
        
         | michaelcampbell wrote:
         | > I would think that PhD. chemists would be responsible for
         | buying their own PPE.
         | 
         | I wouldn't; why would you?
        
           | masklinn wrote:
           | Guessing / hoping they meant the chemists would be
           | responsible for determining / ordering PPE suiting what
           | they're working on, not that they're supposed to pay for it
           | out of pocket.
           | 
           | Though from what I've heard about solid through sand buckets,
           | and pitted face-shields, and contents of lab fridges, I'd
           | think GP a bit optimistic.
        
       | pmoriarty wrote:
       | This reminds me of the tragic case (involving a different
       | compound) of Sheri Sangji[1], a research assistant at UCLA who
       | spilled a pyrophoric substance on her highly flammable synthetic
       | sweater that she was wearing instead of a lab coat.
       | 
       | [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheri_Sangji_case
        
       | praptak wrote:
       | This stuff is scary when you think it could be used in Putin-
       | style assassinations.
        
         | vmception wrote:
         | The assassins are too scared to handle it too
         | 
         | Coupled with the year long gap before death
         | 
         | Its probably not an ideal choice
        
         | pumnikol wrote:
         | It is now assumed that this already happened, in 2011, in a
         | Bulgarian umbrella attack in Germany's crime capital, Hanover.
         | My somewhat unfounded guess is that the perpetrator himself
         | perished not too long after the victim, which would explain why
         | the case is still unsolved.
        
       | trutannus wrote:
       | Worked with a professor who knew this person. He talked about
       | this not infrequently. All the grad students knew of the story as
       | well, and would talk about it. Her death really shook up the NMR
       | community. It was the reason we never use DEM in our lab, and why
       | many try to avoid it at all costs even now. If I remember
       | properly, and this was over 10 years ago, the reason its commonly
       | used is to calibrate the spectrometers, so in some areas it gets
       | hard to avoid.
       | 
       | Also, the article mentions you need nitrile gloves to protect
       | yourself from it. _This is not sufficient_ and is dangerously
       | misinformed. You need _silver shield gloves_ to protect yourself
       | from it.
        
         | kibwen wrote:
         | The article mentions it:
         | 
         |  _" The bulletin also urged that, aside from wearing a face
         | shield, anyone working with dimethylmercury should wear Silver
         | Shield laminate gloves beneath abrasion-resistant outer gloves.
         | [...] Sugden points out that, when dealing with toxic
         | substances, labs have shifted from latex gloves to nitrile
         | gloves, which are less porous"_
        
         | User23 wrote:
         | If I were a chemist and I had to work with that satan's brew I
         | wouldn't trust any gloves. I'd want a proper waldo setup.
        
         | rotifer wrote:
         | > Also, the article mentions you need nitrile gloves to protect
         | yourself from it.
         | 
         | I don't see that. With respect to an OSHA bulletin, the article
         | says:                 The bulletin also urged that, aside from
         | wearing a face shield, anyone working with dimethylmercury
         | should wear Silver Shield laminate gloves beneath abrasion-
         | resistant outer gloves.
         | 
         | The mention of nitrile gloves is in a more general context:
         | Sugden points out that, when dealing with toxic substances,
         | labs have shifted from latex gloves to nitrile gloves, [...]
        
           | crdrost wrote:
           | Yeah I wouldn't even want nitrile gloves on with the stuff.
           | 
           | It is worth explaining just what is wrong with it. Mercury of
           | course is a toxic compound, but kids used to crack mercury
           | thermometers in their mouths and suffer no consequences.
           | Pressure gauges came with exposed tubs of mercury and you
           | would get some on your hands and it was fine, even kind of
           | fun to play around with. Felters famously felt symptoms after
           | careers of using it, usually blamed on long term inhalation,
           | but it required a long time and lots of exposure to get to
           | that point. Many people received dental amalgams with mercury
           | bases and while there has always been a conspiracy theory
           | about it, it has never been acutely toxic enough to be
           | mainstream--the shift to other composites has instead been
           | driven by comfort (metal fillings conduct heat and cold at an
           | unnatural rate) and aesthetics (the new composites are white
           | instead of silvery).
           | 
           | The basic reason is that the body does not eat metal and does
           | not know what to do with it largely. Even with the metals
           | that the body uses, like cobalt, it wraps every atom of
           | cobalt in a big old ring of carbon and that's Vitamin B12.
           | 
           | Dimethyl mercury, is different from normal mercury, in a
           | similar way. The methyl groups are organic groups that your
           | body is much more willing to absorb and process. So the latex
           | is not protecting you nearly as much because latex is this
           | organic natural filter that lets things through... But also
           | your skin is not protecting you because this stuff can seep
           | into your skin via those methyl groups, your cells are just
           | like "oh you look interesting I can take you into my
           | chemistry."
           | 
           | So yeah, milligrams are all it takes, tiny trace amounts: but
           | the reason that you don't think of it being quite that
           | dangerous is that your exposure to the liquid metal version
           | is an exposure to a form that your body is uniquely unsuited
           | to process or absorb. Water off a duck's back. Even though
           | the water contains neurotoxin, it just rolls right off. Even,
           | in our case, when ingested. But add these little methyl
           | groups, methylmercury and dimethylmercury and really any
           | organic mercury molecule, it gets real bad real fast because
           | it's no longer rolling off our backs, it's soaking into our
           | feathers.
        
             | aligray wrote:
             | Thank you very much for taking the time to write such a
             | fascinating comment!
        
             | DaveExeter wrote:
             | When I was a kid I would take the mercury from tilt-
             | switches and pour it from hand to hand.
             | 
             | So heavy and shiny!
        
               | madengr wrote:
        
             | phkahler wrote:
             | So what is the mercury compound they put in multi-dose
             | vaccines?
             | 
             | EDIT: Thiomersal, and it looks pretty organic. I've read
             | that it leaves the bloodstream quickly, but not seen solid
             | evidence that its leaving the body.
        
               | an1sotropy wrote:
               | from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimeros
               | al/index.... "Thimerosal contains ethylmercury, which is
               | cleared from the human body more quickly than
               | methylmercury, and is therefore less likely to cause any
               | harm."
        
           | pumnikol wrote:
           | It's a nice step in the right direction, for sure. But,
           | having worked paying jobs in both Chemistry and Product
           | Safety: Not counting latex, nitrile is the bare minimum,
           | really, when it comes to chemical resistivity, and it cannot
           | handle heat (> 40 degC). But hot surfaces are very common in
           | labs. Hands off of latex gloves, though! Not only are they no
           | good against most chemicals, they can fill up like a sponge
           | and soak your hands with them.
        
       | jonpalmisc wrote:
       | ChubbyEmu's video [1] on this was quite good. (As is the rest of
       | his channel, if this kind of stuff interests you.)
       | 
       | [1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ7M01jV058
        
       | ngcc_hk wrote:
       | Whilst it becomes political now, lab accidents and lab protection
       | even for known risk is still happened. If you study something
       | intensively and it will leak out with more probabilities.
        
       | supernova87a wrote:
       | I think every blackboard organic chemistry class should be
       | required to be taught with multiple repeated asides about the
       | dangers of organometallic reagents. And other dangerous materials
       | too. It's not just pushing electrons around, it's fucking with
       | your life potentially.
       | 
       | And they send you into lab with only folk-story level preparation
       | if you're lucky enough to have gotten that info from others, and
       | one day there is in front of you a bottle of organo-tin looking
       | not too dissimilar from any other less harmful reagent. Only
       | saved from danger by some slightly older grad student saying, "be
       | careful around that stuff" (again, if you're lucky).
       | 
       | I myself only knew about, for example, the dangers of ether
       | bottles left for a long time, because of my own interest in
       | happening to read about it. Not a single person in my entire
       | undergrad/grad career mentioned it. Hydrofluoric acid. Other
       | nasty stuff, etc.
       | 
       | It's a major oversight for student education -- to be taught the
       | dangers of the subject you're about to be exposed to in real
       | life.
        
         | ashtonkem wrote:
         | Even as a lay person I know that most fluorine molecules are
         | not to be messed with.
        
           | dheera wrote:
           | Uh, except the stuff you shove on your toothbrush?
           | 
           | The high-dimensional surface of "threat to life" vs. molecule
           | structure is super, super, non-convex.
           | 
           | Like H2O -> yay, H2O2 -> die, H2 + O2 -> fire
           | 
           | Like methanol -> die, ethanol -> fun, propanol -> die,
           | butanol -> die, heptanol -> die, octanol -> die
        
             | ashtonkem wrote:
             | And that's why I said "most".
        
             | masklinn wrote:
             | > Uh, except the stuff you shove on your toothbrush?
             | 
             | Fluoride is an exception, only in small quantities, and
             | only topically (lots of salts are toxic, and so are
             | concentrated solutions).
             | 
             | By and large fluorine chemistry is a giant pile of nope, so
             | staying away from it is an excellent rule and quite far
             | from a "super, super, non-convex".
        
             | rakejake wrote:
             | My high-school chemistry teacher had this joke: "If you
             | drink Ethanol you dance around people, if you drink
             | Methanol, people end up dancing around you". For context,
             | certain communities in India have people dancing around the
             | funeral procession.
        
             | FreeFull wrote:
             | 1-Propanol acts like ethanol, but stronger, so you'll be
             | fine if you don't ingest too much. 2-Propanol on the other
             | hand (isopropyl alcohol) gets metabolised into acetone,
             | which isn't great. And the only difference between the two
             | is the way the atoms are arranged!
        
         | addaon wrote:
         | Yes. I've often heard (although it appears to be an open
         | question[1]) that chemists have a significantly shorter life
         | span than the general population.
         | 
         | [1] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cen-v049n010.p005
        
         | Natsu wrote:
         | Yeah, most of the time I've read about such compounds it was
         | via blogs, like this one on dimethylcadmium:
         | 
         | https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
         | 
         | "I'm saddened to report that the chemical literature contains
         | descriptions of dimethylcadmium's smell."
        
       | chrisbrandow wrote:
       | I still remember this event when it happened. I was getting my
       | PhD at the time. I think about it regularly.
        
         | DrAwdeOccarim wrote:
         | I started my chem grad school about a decade later and all the
         | changes were well accepted and the field was still mourning her
         | loss. What a tragedy.
        
         | throwawayboise wrote:
         | I wonder if the outcome would have been differnt if she had
         | just immediately changed her gloves (or maybe she did? The
         | story doesn't really say, but implies that she just continued
         | the experiment).
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | verisimi wrote:
        
         | kwohlfahrt wrote:
         | Ethylmercury is used insted of (di-)methylmercury, because it
         | is cleared from the body faster:
         | https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/index....
        
         | bogota wrote:
         | No its not as you pointed out but didn't clarify. Ethylmercury
         | is not the same as methylmercury.
        
         | hammock wrote:
         | It is not. The mercury in (some, but not all or even most,
         | these days) vaccines is ethyl mercury. Here is an article that
         | explains a bit more of the similarity with dimethyl mercury,
         | though - they are both organic mercurials:
         | 
         | >Both ethyl mercury and Hg2+ are very neuro toxic compounds.
         | However, ethyl mercury is more rapidly partitioned into the
         | hydrophobic (fatty) tissues of the central nervous system and
         | is a more potent neuro toxin than Hg2+ based on this
         | "partitioning factor". It is this partitioning factor that
         | makes organic mercurials such as dimethyl mercury so neuro
         | toxically lethal (this is the compound that caused the death of
         | a Dartmouth University chemistry professor after she was
         | exposed to a drop or two on her gloved hand).
         | 
         | >The concern with organic mercurials, such as thimerosal, is
         | that such compounds can be perceived as "pro toxicants" just as
         | certain pharmaceuticals can be classified as "pro drugs". This
         | means that the original compound, e.g. thimerosal, is less
         | reactive giving the compound time to partition into certain
         | areas of the body before it breaks down releasing the ethyl
         | mercury and then further releasing Hg2+. However, while
         | attaching ethyl mercury to thiolsalicylate makes the ethyl
         | mercury less reactive it most likely allows increased
         | partitioning into the central nervous system before the ethyl
         | mercury is released and thereby, increases the neuro toxicity
         | per unit ethyl mercury involved
         | 
         | https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/vaccine-ingredients/thimeros...
        
         | bawolff wrote:
         | I would think it would go without saying vaccines don't use one
         | of the most toxic substances known by virtue of the fact people
         | aren't dropping dead.
        
       | mahkeiro wrote:
       | When I was studying chemistry, latex gloves were not allowed in
       | org chemistry lab as too many thing can go through them and they
       | provide a false sense of security.
        
         | throwawayboise wrote:
         | I didn't take chemistry past freshman general chem, but we
         | didn't use gloves at all. Eye protection, yes.
        
       | julienchastang wrote:
       | Note the time between initial exposure and death -- almost a
       | year. Terrifying.
        
         | brazzy wrote:
         | And about 5 month before any symptoms showed up, then comatose
         | within 3 weeks.
         | 
         | I once asked a biochemist how that's even possible. Apparently
         | it irretrievably destroys a part of the body's metabolism that
         | is necessary to repair nerve cells.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-22 23:00 UTC)