[HN Gopher] Charm - tools to make the command line glamorous ___________________________________________________________________ Charm - tools to make the command line glamorous Author : hillcrestenigma Score : 438 points Date : 2022-01-23 17:46 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (charm.sh) (TXT) w3m dump (charm.sh) | csharpminor wrote: | I love CLI tools, and I think we're just scratching the surface | of what's possible. It's really neat to dig into the UI | components that charm has available. | | It feels as though many GUI-based web / chromium applications are | collapsing under their own weight. They're slow and | discoverability is bad. Maybe worst of all they're always | distracting me with a popup / modal / alert that's unrelated to | my current task. | | A lot of these issues go away in a CLI, and I think there's a | back-to-basics movement forming that could extend beyond the HN | crowd. | jayniz wrote: | Glamorous? More like glorious! | z3t4 wrote: | I wonder if the vt-100 terminal emulator will be used to surf the | next "web"... Instead of web sites, the nerds will run their own | ssh servers, then you can run programs and read files on their | "web site" (ssh shell). This has many advantages over the current | web, for example built in user management - you can allow anyone | access by their public ssh key. Now you say what about graphics ? | Text only might be a break from the ad ridden web today, but you | could also ssh -X to run GUI apps. | rossmohax wrote: | Reminds me of BBS. | [deleted] | maxwell_xander wrote: | This is what I come to HN to see - what a masterful and cool | project. I'm literally dropping my plans today to make a project | using this. | u-rate wrote: | These tools make me want to build command line tools! | dvtrn wrote: | These apps look wonderful, only taking a casual glance at the | repo, has anyone used, or would one recommend using Skate | (https://github.com/charmbracelet/skate) as a personal PW manager | or even keychain? | thoughtpalette wrote: | Also curious on how/what that would look like. | simooooo wrote: | tcldr wrote: | No idea if the tools are any good, but I absolutely love your | branding. Opinionated, but perfect for the demographic. | Lio wrote: | What is the demographic you think this is perfect for? | | Just curious who this appeals to. It's not for me but that's OK | I like opinionated things and recognised that that this is | aimed at someone who probably will love it. | angio wrote: | /r/unixporn users | bostonsre wrote: | Perfect is a strong word, but it definitely seems to target a | younger dev demographic and more specifically, maybe one that | likes Japanese style animated cartoons. | hhh wrote: | Not the parent, but I find it wonderful. The spring library | is one I love. | | There's some _charm_ to spending the time to challenge | preconceived notions of CLI output. I find something very | beautiful about picking up a new tool and being surprised by | the output in a way that piques your curiosity or brings a | smile. | | It's the greatest form of learning to be able to just play. | Should you be implementing these into your enterprise | internal tool to monitor your platforms support tooling? | Probably not. | lowercased wrote: | Perhaps it's developers who are looking for some validation | from and engagement with their eight year old daughters? | [deleted] | amelius wrote: | https://blog.prototypr.io/are-we-designing-for-children-an-a... | zepto wrote: | I am the demographic in that I love using the command line and | want to see it get modernized. | | I thought the design was terrible. Noisy and pointless and | frankly hard to see what is on offer. | | It's _pretty and stylish_ but absolutely awful if you care | about the content, and that makes me worry that the components | themselves will be similar. | skavi wrote: | `ssh git.charm.sh` is maybe more your style? | zepto wrote: | Considerably better | majkinetor wrote: | I am of the same opinion. I closed it although CLI screens | look nice, as I couldn't stand the arbitrary attention | stealing noises all around. | bostonsre wrote: | Maybe it's aimed at a younger demographic and not just all | devs that use cli tools. The design doesn't appeal to me but | the several animated examples and quick blurbs about | functionality seemed to showcase what was on offer pretty | well. | zepto wrote: | Do you know what language the libraries are written for? | [deleted] | achileas wrote: | From the first line of the readme of the first listed | lib: | | > The fun, functional and stateful way to build terminal | apps. A Go framework based on The Elm Architecture. | halfdaft wrote: | same, breath of fresh air | ncpa-cpl wrote: | I really liked their web design. | Shared404 wrote: | Side note on web design: uBlock blocked _nothing_. Usually | when a page that looks like this comes up, I notice 10 's to | 100's of blocked requests. | | On top of that, I disabled JS out of curiosity, and the site | worked completely fine, sans expected failures (the only | thing that stopped working was the little videos by the | libraries)! | | I think this is the first site with this level of "Design" | (Which I usually hate, but they did a really good job of here | here) where both of these things are true. | ncpa-cpl wrote: | Great observation. I had opened it on my old mobile browser | and it loaded super fast too! | Shared404 wrote: | I feel kinda compelled to run a torture test now. | | Just tried w3m on desktop and it was decent, anyone have | IE sitting around? | ncpa-cpl wrote: | I have a celeron pc with xp nearby! | seanw444 wrote: | Agree. I'm generally a fan of the more simplistic websites | (sometimes that means them not looking modern at all), but | they did a fantastic job here. | wpietri wrote: | Could you say a bit more about your demographic and what you | like about it? | | It's definitely not for me, and I'm entirely ok with that. | But I'm really curious about who it works for. | camgunz wrote: | I love Charm; doing `ssh git.charm.sh` is a lot of fun and really | sparks the imagination about SSH apps. They also have usable | solutions for auth and storage, which like, if you're thinking of | writing something like this are the first things you'd start | reaching for. They also work hard to enable you to run all your | own services, so you don't rely on the Charm cloud for | everything. Definitely a good model for future punk projects IMO. | hillcrestenigma wrote: | It really does. I wonder if these SSH applications can be | linked and used like web applications where it's delivered to | the end-user over the network with terminal + SSH being used as | a browser. The only problem for these applications (and | Charmbracelet) would be that there isn't much audience that | could use these. | qbasic_forever wrote: | ttyd is a nice little web terminal: | https://github.com/tsl0922/ttyd Just a small, fast, low fuss | C-based executable. | | wetty is another good option if you want to run a nodejs | server: https://github.com/butlerx/wetty | | Both use xterm.js for the client terminal, which is these | days the only game in town for a web terminal (it's what VS | code and many other electron apps use too). It's quite good. | | Do be aware though that running a web-accessible terminal is | a huge security headache. You're opening up a websocket to | effectively allow commands and code to run on your server. | Pay attention to security and authentication options any web | terminal gives you, and use them. Most are not very secure | out of the box or just following their readme examples. | | And watch out as many rootkits use web terminals as payloads | so smart organizations and security policies will be looking | for them or their traffic and you might get a very concerned | IT person asking you questions if you use these on a network | or machine you don't control. | [deleted] | colecut wrote: | Good point on the small target audience.. It really is a | shame because this is a great looking project. | | I think I should write a web app that handles the SHH | connection on the backend and renders the SHH app into HTML | so that they can be enjoyed by the masses. | | =) | Shared404 wrote: | If you do this, please mention that using a proper terminal | + ssh will work better(This is based on my understanding of | technologies used, but I could be wrong), and you may be | responsible for a lot of people taking their first steps | into knowing computers a lot better! | cdiamand wrote: | Looks cool! Are there any security risks posed by ssh'ing into | an unknown server? | matthewaveryusa wrote: | You potentially send all your key IDs (ie public keys) your | agent has. there are command line options to force your ssh | not to use your agent in which case, barred any bugs in the | ssh client, it's like browsing to a domain in your browser. | divbzero wrote: | The dynamic intuitive interface provided by `ssh git.charm.sh` | is a wonderful example of how text-based user interfaces do not | need to be limited to REPL. I wonder if there is space for a | new text-based web browser that adopts some of the design | features showcased by Charm. | digisign wrote: | A Gemini client might benefit: | | https://gemini.circumlunar.space/ | viraptor wrote: | Aren't Gemini pages static-by-design? It would be hard to | do something really interactive / state-preserving with | them if I'm not mistaken. | capableweb wrote: | > I wonder if there is space for a new text-based web browser | that adopts some of the design features showcased by Charm | | Not sure if you're aware, but older protocols are still | around to be used for this use case, and Gopher has even had | a bit of a resurgence as of late | enriquto wrote: | I'm at the opposite end of the cli taste spectrum (my PS1 is a | single character), but I love this site. | quasarj wrote: | Do you just have a super good memory, remembering where you are | all the time? lol | bmitc wrote: | Damn. I am generally not a fan of command line applications, but | these libraries look amazing. I'm definitely going to be checking | out Bubble Tea. | | And the design of everything is really great. It's unique but not | outlandish. Just clean, simple, and cute. Really impressive stuff | here. | maaslalani wrote: | I've been using Charm tools and libraries for a while now, truly | some of the coolest stuff I've ever experienced on the command | line. | aftergibson wrote: | For a command line library, this site is really fun and well put | together. | kingcharles wrote: | I upvoted for the web design... | sdze wrote: | Gross candy-store like website. I can not believe that the start | page is nearly 14 MB big. | | And I still don't understand what they sell. | brailsafe wrote: | Really effective use of colour. I like the aesthetic | catern wrote: | This looks cool! | | But: These mostly aren't command line applications, they're | mostly terminal applications. They're no more "command-line" than | running "firefox" from your shell is "command-line". | | There's a big difference... a terminal application takes over | your terminal and doesn't have all the usual advantages of | command-line applications used from the shell, like history and | easy scripting. | hunter2_ wrote: | Upon connecting to the demo, they seem to use TUI for what | you're talking about and CLI for what you're not talking about. | sva_ wrote: | When you open the site on some mobile resolution, the ice cream | cone looks like a pile of poo in the bottom left as the rest is | cut out. Kind of funny considering the promise of a "glamorous | cmd line". | zmmmmm wrote: | I love the general renaissance of terminal UI tools we are seeing | in the last few years. | | I can't quite put my finger on what I like about it so much. | Something to do with the simplicity and directness of these UIs, | guaranteed optimised for efficient keyboard nav, widespread | adoption of vim-like navigation keys, and the fact that they link | directly with my terminal shell so I can stay entirely in a | stream of thought while working through complex series of tasks | that weave in and out of these apps and shell interactions. | | I do wish it was easier to select text from the terminal screen | without using the mouse. It is supported in terminals to place | text onto the system clipboard, but rarely implemented in most of | these apps. It's the main reason my hands leave the keyboard. | jck wrote: | You can configure kitty to open the entire scrollback buffer in | an editor or a pager(less/nvim etc). | | https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/719 | Syonyk wrote: | > _I can 't quite put my finger on what I like about it so | much._ | | I can. | | Doesn't require a 1.5GB build directory to make a 500MB binary | that uses 3GB of RAM to display a chat client/music player/etc. | zkader wrote: | Charm's libraries for the CLI are just awesome. I think these | guys are really breathing new life into the CLI and make it look | appealing for all kinds of applications. Chose their bubbletea | library for a CLI file transfer tool | (https://github.com/ZinoKader/portal) and found it a delight to | work with. Super easy to make something that looks and works | great. | bgorman wrote: | I looked at their UI library. How did we get to a place where | "The elm architecture pairs nicely with Go". | skavi wrote: | Do you object to that idea? | ncpa-cpl wrote: | I liked their contact email: vt100@charm... :) | eurasiantiger wrote: | Everything there is worded so that sysadmins and devops kind of | persons will love it. All the product names are cute and | innocuous. This is a huge red flag and the entire operation is | highly suspicious. | tom_ wrote: | Yup, it's that old classic again! Goes something like this: | | Step 1: Produce cutesy web site clearly aimed at a specific | demographic | | Step 2: ??? | | Step 3: ??? | | I've seen it so many times now that I can't believe people | are still falling for it. | rr808 wrote: | While we're on the subject (and from Rich the other day) is there | a library to do pretty command line apps for Java? | a-saleh wrote: | , I like it, but I am not sure about diving into Golant again. | | Any way to use it in other languages? | | Or do I just keep poking at Rich[1] in Python? | | [1] https://rich.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ | nathias wrote: | Wow, this is really cool. | eurasiantiger wrote: | This seems highly suspicious in light of recent supply chain | attacks. Offering everyone a nice CLI experience, and so well | branded and 1337 too. | | According to Crunchbase, the company has two employees and | receives millions in funding. | | Something doesn't add up here. | achileas wrote: | More often than not, it's the Crunchbase DB. Especially for | early companies it can be pretty out of date quickly. My | current employer had its entry badly merged with a similar | named company that wasn't even close to what we did, so we had | the wrong description for over a year. | | Also it lists two employee profiles, but a size of 1-10. This | is common too, again at my current employer we've got a | headcount in the 20s but only 1 or 2 employee profiles on | crunchbase. $3M is also not a massive seed round by any means, | I've seen plenty of early startups with 2-4 employees raise | $9M+. | friend-monoid wrote: | # Arch Linux (btw) yay -S glow | | Heh, nice take on the whole "I use Arch btw" meme. | | This is really cool. | encryptluks2 wrote: | What I don't understand is with the recent adaptation of GPU- | accelerated terminals, why not create something that actually | renders Markdown like you'd expect in the browser, but in the | terminal? It would have to be significantly faster than the | bloat of a typical browser, but just with limited features... | like no JS engine. | Noumenon72 wrote: | Is this like, a framework for making command line apps, the way | Spring is a framework for making web apps? | | Is Soft Serve for people who don't want to use GitHub? | qbasic_forever wrote: | > Is Soft Serve for people who don't want to use GitHub? | | There's no web UI for soft serve, it's strictly a command line | and config driven git repo manager. It's more of a direct | comparison to look at gitolite (also a script/CLI driven repo | manager). | | If you're looking for a run your own web UI for git, check out | gitea. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-23 23:00 UTC)