[HN Gopher] Meditation and the Unconscious ___________________________________________________________________ Meditation and the Unconscious Author : solvent Score : 47 points Date : 2022-01-24 20:15 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu) | PaulHoule wrote: | Makes me think of how Marvin Minsky thought Meditation was a bad | thing. | cowuser666 wrote: | Can you cite? I'm interested in this idea but it's unclear | where he discusses meditation as such, rather than things like | consciousness and introspection? | simmanian wrote: | What from the article makes you think that meditation is a bad | thing? | vishnugupta wrote: | "As far as your own inner conflicts are concerned, if you use | meditation simply as a quick fix to superficially appease | your emotions, you temporarily enjoy a pleasant deferral of | these inner conflicts. But as you rightly say, these cosmetic | changes have not reached the root of the problem. | | Merely putting problems to sleep for a while or trying to | forcibly suppress strong emotions will not help either. You | are just keeping a time bomb ticking somewhere in a corner of | your mind. | | True meditation, however, is not just taking a break. It is | not simply closing one's eyes to the problem for a while. | Meditation goes to the root of the problem. You need to | become aware of the destructive aspect of compulsive | attachment and all of the conflictive mental states that you | mentioned. They are destructive in the sense of undermining | your happiness and that of others, and to counteract them you | need more than just a calming pill. Meditation practice | offers many kinds of antidotes. " | hammock wrote: | That comment sounds like it applies to watching TV (or any | other form of escapism) as much as meditation. | PaulHoule wrote: | Minsky thought meditation was dangerous in and of itself. | (e.g. you aren't meant to inspect your own functioning) | | Personally I did a mindfulness practice for a while that I | thought was harmful because it encouraged me to accept | unacceptable situations which was already leading me to bad | outcomes. | p_j_w wrote: | >e.g. you aren't meant to inspect your own functioning | | I'd be curious how this view is justified. | | >I did a mindfulness practice for a while that I thought | was harmful because it encouraged me to accept | unacceptable situations | | I've never heard of this being part of mindfulness, | unless said unacceptable situations were entirely beyond | your control. | 613style wrote: | "Accepting" in the context of mindfulness doesn't imply | being passive. That's a common misconception. It's often | said that passivity is the "near enemy" of acceptance, | meaning one is easily mistaken for the other. | LanceJones wrote: | This is an underrated comment. Mindfulness is a precursor | to objectifying your thoughts, emotions, sensations, and | perceptions -- rather than "subjectifying" them (in other | words, you are not your thoughts, emotions, etc). It | doesn't at ALL mean laying down for others to kick you | and taking it. They're completely different things. | chillingeffect wrote: | glad to see this here and I would expand on it bc I think | it's so important. | | For a long time, I, too, thought accepting Something Bad | meant forcing oneself to appreciate it somehow, to | reframe it as actually good, or to lie to oneself or even | to "approve" of it. Just to re-iterate: those would all | be unproductive, or Wrong Action, or just "bad." | | Instead, accepting means allowing one's self to | acknowledge something happened without it driving thought | to somewhere else. E.g. I was assaulted by a neighbor | recently... true story... I was very traumatized for a | few weeks and unable to process it well. As I slowly | gathered myself up, I began to accept it. It doesn't mean | I approve of it or welcome it or anything like that. I | still hate the motherfucker and I'm disturbed that | justice will never come for him, except hopefully he will | fuck over the wrong person who is unlike me a scary | person, and he'll get what he has coming. | | But you see how I digressed there, moving out of the | present and away from the fact, moving toward a fantasy? | That part is not acceptance, either. For me, acceptance | is simply being able to sit still and say, "yes, my | neighbor injured me for life." | | And to sit. and wait. and abide. and feel those urges to | get mad and perhaps to get mad, but not to lose focus. | When we get mad and lose focus, our minds confuse the | negative feelings with our surroundings. I need to train | my mind to connect the anger with what he did - not my | current, comfy surroundings with a 43" 4k monitor and | cool can of cranberry lime seltzer. | | We do this because magic happens. when we simply sit with | it, our mind begins to actually process it. It's an | organic version of a mechanistic process that you don't | have to consciously run, but you can almost consciously | obbserve. I like to imagine a fleet of trucks in a | warehouse. They are carrying the heavy load of the trauma | or upset in them and they need to bring it to the right | departments in the brain to chop it up, water it down, | separate it, dissolve, and re-fabricate it into something | new. This is an automatic process our minds have | apparently evolved. And it's free! | | But it requires some squirminess, some patience, some | willingness to temporarily feel discomfort while sitting | here, feeling the pain in my lower back, coming to terms | with it. _not_ appreciating it, but become capable of | sitting with it. | | So I urge GP to circle back and consider this way of | accepting, rather than someone telling you you should | appreciate or thank the pain or some kind of bullshit | like that. This doesn't correct or justify and evil. All | this does is remove my own excess reaction to it so I can | bring myself to peace by not flipping out when I | inevitably recall it. | | Please accept my compassion for whatever your | circumstances were and consider the advice of the late | Thich Nhat Hanh to sit still and take it in. Let the | delivery tracks in your mind do their processing and you | will feel it settle and your mind will allow you to | function better again. | emptysongglass wrote: | Meditation is a tool that cuts both ways. It must be | used, like any tool, with respect and careful practice. | The Buddha analogized it to a poisonous viper in the | wrong hands. | | I'll give you one example from my own practice. When I | learned the Mahasi style of vipassana (mindfulness) | meditation, which has you note sense objects as they | arise, I noted _everything_ , including conversation. I | noted "hearing, hearing, hearing" as I'd listen to the | story of my elocutor. This brought me no closer to | awakening! The act of hearing and awareness of hearing is | so very far from understanding the content of | conversation. | | Small misunderstandings like these lead to big | consequences. | | "What is abstruse, subtle, deep, hard to see, going | against the flow -- those delighting in passion, cloaked | in the mass of darkness, won't see." | | Abstruse and subtle! Difficult to discern. Difficult for | anyone, even monks in their monastic redoubts. | zozbot234 wrote: | Vipassana is _insight_ meditation, which is generally | contrasted with mindfulness (known as 'samatha'). | "Mindfulness" is generally thought of as a prerequisite | to insight, though an especially committed vipassana | practitioner might well develop both concurrently. (The | aforementioned 'insight' is of course meant as insight | into the three core features of phenomenology, viz. the | impermanence of subjective states, the all-pervading | dissatisfaction of 'craving' and 'clinging' and the lack | of a true 'self'.) | lewispollard wrote: | Mindfulness meditation is a term we use to describe the | practices that certain famous/influential western | meditation practitioners developed after coming back from | the mostly theravada countries that they went to to learn | meditation practices from the monks there in the 50-70s. | Generally speaking, those practices were | vipassana/insight practices, and so mindfulness practices | are in essence, or at least are modified vipassana | techniques. Mindfulness is the translation we tend to use | for the Pali `sati`, mindfulness techniques tend to | develop this quality of `sati`, which is a kind of re- | contextualisation of your perception from "I am having an | experience" to "an experience is happening within | conscious awareness" in a direct, first person way. And | yeah, the development of sati, along with other helpful | factors, can help to gain insight, which is basically the | way the mind looks at itself and conceptualises its own | experience, in a kind of self-reflective way, and what it | means to relax and tighten the tension that holding the | mind in that way causes. | | In these western teachings and in the theravadan | writings, usually insight is contrasted with | "concentration", which is `samatha`, which is a kind of | effortless concentration on one thing. Focusing solely on | the sensations of the breath at a point in your body is | one way of doing samatha, or imagining a complex mental | image (of, say, a mandala) or a simple image like a white | circle. This kind of meditation is about dropping your | attachment to everything except this one thing, which | creates a strong attachment to that thing to the | exclusion of all else, and this is often pleasurable | because you're both strongly mentally attached to that | sensation and it's a sensation that keeps happening at | high "volume", which is very rewarding. With this you can | enter states called `jhana` (which is actually pretty | much the only word in early buddhism for "meditation", | and through the spread of Buddhism, linguistically became | "chan" in China, "zen" in Japan, and "seon" in Korea, | "thien" in Vietnam...) | | The reason that they are contrasted is because | mindfulness practices tend to go the other way and | include a larger scope of what you are including in your | attention, for example mentally labelling what senses are | being activated from moment to moment, or the sensations | of the body/breath in a more wholesome way without | blocking out external stimuli, but developing very strong | clarity on the momentary aspects of those sensations and | experiences, sort of applying a "samatha" style | concentration to analysing the sensations as the "three | core features" you described. | | Both the approaches tend to suppress the "hindrances" in | the mind that prevent jhana and insight. These are | recurring thoughts and emotions that trouble you and stop | this kind of mental configuration from happening in a | stable way. The techniques use up mental and perceptual | "bandwidth" in holding the mind in a way so that | attention/awareness and holding on/letting go are | balanced on whatever the object of meditation is. By | developing samatha or sati, or a some of both mixed | together, you can enter interesting and unusual states of | consciousness that are pleasant, weird, intriguing, | peaceful- that can be used as a point of inquiry into why | the mind is grasping at things in certain ways and what | the result of that grasping is doing to it. | lhorie wrote: | Towards the end of the article, they touch on this: | | > The antidote is to be aware of desire or anger, instead | of identifying with it. | | The general idea is to develop a sort of recursive | awareness. In your case, it seems like there was a | problematic situation that you were struggling with, and | that once you became aware of shifts of perspective as a | tool for actionable-ness, you attempted to do the | "opposite" of struggling (accepting uncontrollable things | as inevitable). But now your awareness extends to being | able to see that neither of those options are necessarily | the two polar extremes of the spectrum of choices you | have. | | One aspect that kinda rubs me the wrong way when people | talk about mindfulness is this idea that things can just | magically fall into place. I think it downplays the | difference between being aware of something and the | effort it takes to do something about it. I tend to think | of mindfulness in terms of turning unknown unknowns into | known unknowns. The former isn't actionable because | you're not even aware of it. The latter is actionable in | _some_ way, but the exact way to go about it may not | necessarily be obvious or easy. | lewispollard wrote: | > I tend to think of mindfulness in terms of turning | unknown unknowns into known unknowns. The former isn't | actionable because you're not even aware of it. The | latter is actionable in some way, but the exact way to go | about it may not necessarily be obvious or easy. | | I like that and somewhat agree. It's not that some | mystical force makes life easier for you because of your | merit, it's just that you have a much greater awareness | and comfort of your own ignorance. So it's not a surprise | when that ignorance is revealed by the situations of life | in stark ways, and you can more calmly respond to them | than if you were otherwise triggered by them in an | identified way. | adfm wrote: | Minsky had many questionable opinions. Obviously somebody | consumed by avarice would have an aversion to meditation. | jimhefferon wrote: | Could you say more about "consumed by avarice"? I've not | heard anyone say that before. | TrainedMonkey wrote: | Why is that obvious? | i_like_apis wrote: | I've always found it interesting that many meditation | techniques involve "emptying the mind" or "clearing the mind" | of thought. | | While practicing concentration on a single point of focus | definitely seems useful for strengthening the mind, I'm not | sure that practicing a state of being completely devoid of | thought is necessarily healthy. I would rather meditate on | being _full_ of thought, and thinking of many things | simultaneously, or meditate on focus in a high distraction | environment. | | I wonder if there are meditation styles that embrace this? | vidarh wrote: | Concentration meditation is in large part an exercise in the | ability to focus, not on emptying the mind per se, though | some traditions will use exercises that expect it. | | But concentration meditation is not an end in itself, but | generally a tool to aid in meditating on other things, | including on thoughts ariaing on your mind, bodily impulses, | emotion and others. | n4r9 wrote: | I think a Buddhist might argue that one's mind is a high | distraction environment. | cypherpunks01 wrote: | "One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, | but by making the darkness conscious. | | The latter procedure, however, is disagreeable and therefore not | popular." | | -C.G. Jung | leoh wrote: | I am in agreement with Jung; yet not to only make darkness | conscious, but by beholding it with love and presence... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-24 23:02 UTC)