[HN Gopher] AirPods don't "just work" ___________________________________________________________________ AirPods don't "just work" Author : knowingathing Score : 733 points Date : 2022-01-26 12:58 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (philip.design) (TXT) w3m dump (philip.design) | activitypea wrote: | I recenty got the AirPods Pro and they're really underwhelming. | Apart from their durability, everything they do can be found on | headphones half the price e.g. Anker | cromka wrote: | I have many of those issues mentioned in the article _daily_ with | iPhone 13 Pro and MacBook Air M1. | | Whatever Apple advertised as AirPods Pro features, it's all false | advertising. I can't get anything to work reliably. Anything. I | don't trust them at all with any sort of serious meeting at this | point, either, since they recently started to randomly switch | from being actively used with my MacBook to an _idling_ iPhone in | another room. Seriously, Apple? | | The experience is getting worse and worse. And I seriously wonder | why isn't it yet another class action - they well deserve it. | Causality1 wrote: | _if you instantly play the music you were listening to right | before the call by clicking the play button on your keyboard, | your music will play at a lower audio quality_ | | I don't recall the names of the specific bluetooth profiles, but | I wish Airpods and bluetooth headphones in general gave you more | control over this. Sure, the older headset profile is noticeably | lower quality but it's also virtually lag-free. I have a shitty | old headset I use when gaming on my phone specifically because | there's no noticeable latency. | Nextgrid wrote: | It's AD2P vs HSP profiles. One gives you good (well, compressed | but decent enough) stereo audio one way, one provides shitty | audio but both ways. | | I'm surprised as to why Apple couldn't come up with a better | protocol that would manage to do both or switch number of | channels & quality seamlessly. | Causality1 wrote: | Nobody seems to care, is the thing. Qualcomm is now | deprecating APTX-LL in favor of APTX-Adaptive even though | it's 50% laggier even under ideal circumstances. | INTPenis wrote: | It's nice for someone like me who left the Apple ecosystem many | years ago to see that an image for producing fancy gadgets does | not mean you can eliminate common software issues. | | Because this sounds just like any pair of BT headphones I've used | in the last 2 years. Since I finally gave in and started using BT | headphones | | All in all I love them, I love being able to clean with | headphones on and not snag on anything. I love being able to bike | with them and not be tied to my phone. | | But the BT issues are horrendous. After a year of just accepting | that BT sucked someone finally said "install the app" so I did | and the firmware update that resulted in solved most of the | common issues actually. | | So what's left now is weird stuff and quirks of Android. Like | Android has a default setting to reconnect to connected speakers | as soon as it sees them. Just like in OPs post this is supposed | to be convenient but 99% of the time it's just annoying to me. | Because I haven't even put my bike away coming home and already | the speaker is blaring my audiobook in the kitchen, where I can't | hear it. | | The other issues are the slow connection when you get a call but | that's a bit over demanding imho. Since it wasn't connected and | you connect as you get the call so it's a bit short notice. | | And then there are the rare unexplained issues like once a month | I just disconnect and reboot everything because apps are playing, | but no sound is coming out on BT. | dont__panic wrote: | Yeah, there's something comforting about a physical connection | I can inspect for defects or just unplug, then plug back in if | audio isn't working right. Even when I used AirPods/Pro for a | while, I never really _trusted_ the headphones. Sometimes I | would take them out of the case and they just didn 't connect | to my phone. Sometimes they didn't seat quite right in the case | and didn't charge overnight, and would be totally dead. | Sometimes they would connect, play the sound, show up as the | audio output on my phone... then refuse to actually play any | audio. | | I understand that wireless is a nice convenience for a lot of | people. But BT makes wireless such a nightmare I just don't | think it's worth it. Incredible that nobody has come up with a | competing standard. | falcolas wrote: | Logitech has had a competing standard for years (I have | decade-old wireless G series headphones which work | flawlessly). | | I'm not sure why their low-latency/high quality system hasn't | been more broadly adopted. Probably requires too much power. | dont__panic wrote: | Is it the same tech their wireless mice use, or some | variation? I've had really great experiences with that on | my MX Master 2. | Taylor_OD wrote: | Yup. The same thing happens with my car. I'm listening to | something and the audio cut out? Looks like my wife is at home | and Children of Dune is blasting in our driveway now. | | I guess I like the fact that when I'm in the car I don't have | to do anything for it to pair and work but... It seems like | there has to be a better way. | ulzeraj wrote: | Within less than a year of use my AirPod Plus now makes very | annoying buzzing sounds when the microphone is used or any other | vibration happens. Its like having a wasp inside your ear. This | only happens in transparent and noise reduction mode. | | Assuming its broken not sure if I trust the product enough to buy | another. | dsizzle wrote: | This happened to me on two separate pairs (!), and Apple | replaced them both for free. | | https://support.apple.com/airpods-pro-service-program-sound-... | | BTW, you mean AirPod Pro (not Plus). | theginger wrote: | Why is this article is dated 28th of January 2022? It is the 26th | of January 2022, (maybe the 27th in a very eastern timezone) | hamandcheese wrote: | I'm curious if any of these annoyances are better when using with | an M1 mac. | | For example, plugging in my dock (with two 4K monitors attached) | is always super slow and janky and takes several seconds for the | monitors to display anything. Supposedly on the M1 this is | instant. | jasonnchann wrote: | My Bluetooth connection has become less and less reliable on my | Airpod Pros, which tell me a new one is probably coming soon. | Funny how that works :) | easton wrote: | The "low audio quality after/during conference" problem as I | understand it is because of the SCO codec used for Bluetooth | microphone stuff (which is lower bandwidth but allows you to | speak and listen at the same time). It takes a few seconds for | the AirPods to switch back to their usual codec. | | Is there a way to fix this without ditching Bluetooth? | tomrod wrote: | I have the same issue with Samsung earbuds on Linux. My | solution was to get a nice webcam with a solid camera, or to | use an external mic. Win-win -- good quality sound, video, and | mic. | archepyx wrote: | bitwize wrote: | You know what Just Work? The $10 Skullcandy headphones I plugged | into my phone's headphone jack. | | Forces greater than us have decided that something so simple yet | so functional is obsolete so we can't have it on our phones | without a dongle. | recursive wrote: | "Forces" didn't do it. The headphone jack on my phone is doing | great. You can have one too if you choose to. | sovietmudkipz wrote: | Mine play a high pitched prolongated shrill ping at the highest | volume it can. It happened 3 times before I threw them away and | went back to hard wired headphones. It hurt. The first time I | reacted quickly to get them out of my ears. | | I figure it has something to do with the noise cancelling | feature. I also figure it has something to do with me using my | AirPods to run, thereby being exposed to moist conditions for | prolongated times. I no longer trust headphones like I did. | stefanwlb wrote: | suresk wrote: | I had frustrating issues where they would halfway connect, then | disconnect, and only a reboot of the Mac would fix it. Finally | trawled through system logs to realize that Spotify was | preventing it from fully connecting. Apparently, an app can | register callbacks of some sort that get called during the | connect/handshake/sync process, and those can cause it to fail? | | Also, hate how sometimes only one side will charge. | dt2m wrote: | All valid annoyances, but I really think OP should try using | another brand of Bluetooth headphones for a week just to get some | perspective of how well AirPods "just work" compared to the | competition. | | Manually having to re-pair once in every blue moon, one earbud | playing while the other isn't, no automatic device switching | without having to go through the Settings app everytime, A/V | desync, dodgy mic quality, earbuds not waking up correctly when | removing them from the case, etc are all part of the non-AirPods | Bluetooth experience. | | I recently switched to a pair of Sony Bluetooth headphones as I | don't like the too-neutral AirPods Pro EQ curve, and while they | sound excellent, the UX really leaves a bit to be desired. | rsfayez wrote: | Sony bluetooth is wonderful! The pair is lasting me the longest | any earphone every have | jensensbutton wrote: | Get some jabra 75Ts. Problems solved. | carb wrote: | Also agreed. I have been using Jabra earbuds daily for about | four years and they would perfectly. | VadimPR wrote: | Agreed, Jabras work great without the issues listed here. | stronglikedan wrote: | I had to return mine because the kept popping out, regardless | of tip size or material. Now I have the Galaxy Buds Pro, | which not only sound better to me (Jabras have IEM sound that | I dislike), but also have none of the problems described. And | while the do back out, they don't pop out, so it's | manageable, | 015a wrote: | Owning Sony XM4s, Galaxy Buds Pros, Bose QC, and Airpods Pros: | that's an extreme take. All of these devices "just work" and | "don't just work" in nearly the same ways. | | The microphone quality is a tin can on all of them. Among my | friends in Discord, anytime someone logs on with a shit mic the | meme is "dude are you using airpods?!" They usually are. Or any | earbeans. Because they're all bad. | | The AV desync is an equal issue on both of them. BT headphones | are basically useless for any realtime application (think: | playing a digital piano). | | This may just be me, but: I have no idea what the "automatic | device switching" airpods feature is. I have a Mac. I have an | iPhone. If I want to switch my Airpods from iPhone to the Mac, | I have to go to the bluetooth menu in the toolbar, and click | the Airpods on the Mac... just like the XM4s. To go back, I go | into the bluetooth quick settings menu and click Airpods Pros. | Its exactly the same. Like, ever since they announced this | feature, I feel like either the world entered a collective | psychosis on what this feature does, or I'm getting old and I'm | missing something, but its _exactly the same_ (and, not that | bad; exactly how many steps I 'd expect to switch an audio | output device). The Airpods are certainly very nice during the | _initial_ pair process, but that 's a one-time thing on both | devices. | | The scary part to me is: the APPs do have slightly better UX on | Apple devices. And it isn't just the value-add features like | "automatic" switching and spatial audio; I do experience | slightly more AV desync on the XM4s on iPhone. The XM4s | sometimes won't connect to my Mac. But these issues are | entirely and totally Apple device specific; I also regularly | use the XM4s with a Galaxy S21 Ultra and Windows 11 PC, and | they're just where I'd expect BT headphones to land there. I | really think this is an "Intel Mac situation", where Apple is | intentionally ruining (or ignoring, and thus leaving to | languish) the experience of integrating non-Apple devices so | they can sell their accessories. Then, even educated customers | start saying "the APPs just work better" even though what's | really happening is, the iPhone is just working worse with non- | APPs, and Apple is pushing their monopoly once again. | | And I say all that coming to the conclusion: If friends ask me | what earbeans to buy, if they have an iPhone, just buy APPs. | They have better UX, in very small but nonetheless extant ways, | even if I'm convinced it's because of Apple's monopoly control | over consumer devices. Maybe more-so: they have a very neutral, | unoffensive sound profile. Its boring. But the quality is | competitive with any other bean out there, which is to say: | great. It works for nearly any type of music, and no one will | complain about it. | | None of the other "tech company beans" can compete with the | APPs. Some are cheaper. All of them suck. This meaning: | Samsung, Microsoft, Google beans. | | But if you're on Android; the APPs are still a top 3 choice. | However, I'd add: if you want a neutral sound profile, the Bose | QC beans (non-sport) have better noise cancellation and | comparable audio quality. If you'd welcome or accept a more | bass-heavy sound signature and larger (yet still comfortable) | in-ear profile: the Sony XM4s are the best beans money can buy. | Waterluvian wrote: | I had these $20 pair of Anker bluetooth earbuds and they just | worked. I paired them once and they were effortless to use for | years on my iPhone. Just hold a button down for 3 seconds and | they're on and ready in seconds. | | They even went through the wash, twice. But then I lost them. | cush wrote: | Bluetooth is such a fussy, unreliable protocol. | | I'd love to have a new, modern protocol that simply requires | some kind of basic, physical connection to pair two devices. | That way, I'd always know exactly which two devices are | connected and a third couldn't break it so easily. | projektfu wrote: | Of course I expect that it would lead to something with the | unreliability of Bluetooth and the requirement that you | physically touch the devices together every time it loses its | connection. | cush wrote: | Right, for sure. I was thinking more like a wire or cable | that physically connected the two devices. If the wire is | connected, then they can share audio, else they can't. | finder83 wrote: | That's all part of the Airpods experience for me. Randomly have | to reinsert into the case to get both earbuds working, devices | I've connected to won't work if I've connected more devices, if | I reboot from Linux to windows I have to drop them and re-pair | them (I assume they pair based on a device id?), sometimes they | don't charge but it's impossible to tell because when I open | them it just shows yellow. Maybe it's because I have the first | gen and no apple devices, but I really don't care for them. | | My wife's soundcores work great. | | My Bose over-ear are a much better experience. | elif wrote: | i dont have any of these issues with galaxy buds pro... | hatware wrote: | My airpods have constant issues. Maybe you should take notice | that Apple's products don't have the simplicity of setup they | were once known for... | sokoloff wrote: | I have a couple pairs of other "quite cheap" BT earbuds from | Amazon and they're all quite good ergonomically. They paired | easily, stay paired, charge automatically, etc. | | I don't use them as a microphone very often (as I have an arm- | mounted Blue Yeti), but when I've had to use them, they also | worked without me getting complaints from the other side. | | Maybe Airpods are wildly better somehow, but I can't see how | much better they could be versus the totally acceptable | experience I've had with the cheap ones. | cochne wrote: | Almost all of the issues you described I have also experienced | with AirPods. | | Sometimes going into the Bluetooth menu and selecting them is | not even enough to convince them to play audio from my phone. I | had to get out of bed and turn off the Bluetooth on my laptop. | slingnow wrote: | So your argument for why Airpods suck is that "hey, everything | else sucks too"? I thought Apple was supposed to be a shining | beacon of simplicity, hence they should absolutely "just work". | Graffur wrote: | I use Android and bought the cheapest wireless/bluetooth | earphones I could find. They "just work". When I open the | charging case, they connect to my phone. The bad points are the | sound quality and the lack of noise cancellation | Causality1 wrote: | No noise cancellation is better than bad noise cancellation. | The ANC on every set of earbuds and headphones under $200 | I've tried is just a blast of white noise that makes it feel | like someone is ramming cotton balls into my ears with a | jackhammer. | The_Colonel wrote: | I guess it depends on the use case. ANC on my FreeBuds | (which are open type) is certainly limited, but it's a make | or break difference in e.g. public transportation. | toastal wrote: | Additional anecdote, I have Sony XM3s and they are constantly | having issues on both Android and Linux while being expensive | and having excellent noise cancelation. They just worked for | like the first 2-3 months but after a year, they've seemed to | have gotten worse in basically all aspects (although | interestingly switching from Sony's app to GadgetBridge for | pairing and config, I seem to get better battery life). The | connectivity has gotten so bad and I've caused so many | interruptions in telemeetings that I bought a new pair of | wired IEMs because I know analog actually just works (though | my laptop lacks a headphone jack because of OEMs follow | Apple's trends regardless of if the idea was good or bad). | aceazzameen wrote: | Oof. I'm sorry. My XM3s have been going strong connecting | to Android and Windows devices for 2 years. I have the Sony | app on my phone, but it doesn't launch when I connect. I | never use it. I just use the system Bluetooth with LDAC. | SXX wrote: | I used XM3 for 2 years on Linux, Windows, macOS and | Android. I guess I used them for 4-12 hours a day most for | most of these two years. I guess I spent at least 1/4 of | this period with them on my head. And I dropped them many | times, weared them during my runs on seaside in hot weather | as well as walked in them inrain / snow. | | They still work as good as new except for battery life, but | this expected for device that had 500-1000 recharge cycles. | I guess battery lost like 30-50% of original capacity. | | PS: I only used Sony app a few times to update firmware and | change settings though. | richiebful1 wrote: | A laptop not having a headphone jack is irritating. | | The 2021 MacBook Pro has a headphone jack. I can understand | taking the jack out of a phone because it makes it more | water resistant and frees up space, but in a laptop there's | a much larger footprint to work with. And users are more | concerned with plugging in peripherals vs waterproofing in | a laptop. | thebean11 wrote: | All Apple laptops have a 3.5mm headphone jack though..not | sure you can blame Apple. | mojzu wrote: | If you're connecting to one device most bluetooth headphones | will work just fine, the biggest pain point is when you have | multiple devices to switch between. I've got some nice noise | cancelling headphones I like to switch between my TV and | ipad, where you've got to dig into the settings of both, | disconnect it from one before connecting it to the other | (which takes an unlock and 4 clicks on the ipad and about 10 | clicks on the TV). | | The biggest pro of the airpods for me though is the non-pro | version, for whatever reason I just cannot stand in-ear | headphones. The gripes in the article are all valid though, | personally I'd really like to be able to pair bluetooth | headphones to as many devices as I like then have a button in | the system tray (or anywhere where it'd be a couple of | swipes/clicks maximum) that is the equivalent of "I want | sound from this device now" | hoistbypetard wrote: | Some of the complaints OP lists are related to using the | Airpods with multiple devices. While the complaints are | correct, the Airpods are miles better than any bluetooth | earphones I've ever used when it comes to switching sources. | The dance to get my old earphones to move from my phone to my | tablet was annoying and brittle by comparison. | The_Colonel wrote: | > the Airpods are miles better than any bluetooth earphones | I've ever used when it comes to switching sources | | I think this just depends on Bluetooth version. My current | FreeBuds 4 switch between devices seamlessly, no manual | switching needed. | | With my old headphones I head to switch manually, but it | wasn't that much of a bother with a switching widget on the | main screen (instead going deep into the settings). | computerex wrote: | I don't know, my experience with Samsung's buds plus and buds | live has been flawless. | cainxinth wrote: | I bought my first pair of Airpod Pros recently. The previous | two years I was using Bluedio T Elf 2 that I paid $17 for on | Amazon. The sound quality and feature set is obviously much | better with the Airpods, but not 10X better despite costing 10X | the price. | | The Bluedios were better for podcasts than music due to their | middling sound quality, but they paired properly most of the | time and worked without issue. | pnutjam wrote: | I have 2 sets from Monoprice, both pretty inexpensive. The | cheapest ones don't have a very good microphone and they are | tinny, but fine for podcasts. They also switch ears and pair | easily like a champ. I can Pair either one, pull out the other | one and let it pair, then put the first away, or leave them | both in. I've been really impressed. The slightly more | expensive pair will only pair the right one unless I create a | specific profile for the left one. Switching from one to two is | hit or miss and forget about switching from right to left (or | vice-versa) without pausing everything for a minute or so. | wdb wrote: | Yes, I am daily struggling to connect my Sony MX4 headphones in | a way the microphone also works so I can use it with Google | Meetings. I have re-paired them already more often than my | AirPods. | thereddaikon wrote: | I actually don't have any of those problems with galaxy buds | live but absolutely hate the touch controls. They are so | inconsistent. Sometimes it registers a touch. Sometimes it | doesn't. Sometimes it does but doesn't actually perform the | action to I have so do it again. | rodelrod wrote: | Maybe that audio jack wasn't such a bad idea after all. | falcolas wrote: | It must not be - even Apple has kept it on their laptops and | desktops. | | Admitting past decisions were bad is hard. | worldsayshi wrote: | Or maybe some people just need to fix their shit. Connecting | audio devices to any OS, except maybe Android (dunno about | iOS), is chaos. There is no inherently good reason to this. | deltarholamda wrote: | As much as people hate wires, I have to say that I much | appreciate the "just works" aspect of it. Even wifi, while it | has improved an awful lot over the years, is not nearly as | reliable as the (albeit annoying) ethernet cable. | | I have the same issue with wireless keyboards and mice. The | idea that I have to charge or put batteries into my mouse is | infuriating. | [deleted] | mojuba wrote: | I usually keep my Magic Trackpad connected to USB because I | know it switches to wired operation with no latency and 100% | reliability. Also an option. | falcolas wrote: | > not nearly as reliable as the (albeit annoying) ethernet | cable. | | I keep one plugged into an inexpensive USB-C "dock" at my | desk, and it's wonderful. That and wired headphones mean I | always sound decent, don't break up when the microwave's in | use, and never have to play the "can you hear me now" game. | ashtonkem wrote: | Opposite for me. The wifi in my office beats out my USB C | adapter by a factor of 4. | | Wifi is great, consumer grade routers are not though. | falcolas wrote: | Beats... how? Bandwidth? Packet loss? Latency? | | One, that wifi bandwidth is being shared by everyone | around you. Ideally, you'll only have about 4 peers for | your given hotspot, but most companies are a bit more... | frugal... than that. Two, that WiFi is going through | those same routers. Just sayin'. | ashtonkem wrote: | Bandwidth is typically what I've measured. Never had a | noticeable issue with packet loss. Or latency. | | Edit: the difference between my work laptop (wireless) | and my gaming machine (wired) in my office is a mere 5ms | to the same external server. That's in the "meh" | territory for me. | | Currently I have five APs inside and outside my house, | and they're averaging about 5-6 clients per AP. The | really network intensive stuff is connected via Ethernet | to avoid crowding out the airwaves. In my case that means | the Apple TV and my gaming rig, both of which are | conveniently non mobile and close to wall plates. | | The issue for my work laptop is that the cheaper USB C | hubs only pull 100mbps. So I can get 100mbps wired, | 450mbps wireless, or the full 950 by replacing my hub. On | the balance the wireless is more convenient, especially | with a sit/stand desk like mine making more wires more | annoying. If I replace the hub I'll reconsider, but 450 | is plenty for my needs. | [deleted] | falcolas wrote: | Fair enough. | | With as important as live calls have been for work, it | was worth it to get a wired adapter to avoid the | occasional latency spikes and to limit the packet round | trip time. It is legitimately noticeable to me when I'm | on wifi and not wired (I keep both active for | simplicity's sake). | | Anker offers a nice one that was only about $40, and | provides both gigabit ethernet (1000baseT (or an | incredible fake thereof)) and some USB-A connections as | well. | okl wrote: | Also (generally) better sound quality (mic) and no | latency/artifacting issues. Much cheaper as well. | toxik wrote: | Don't mind me over here with a Ethernet dongle that randomly | disconnects intermittently. | dont__panic wrote: | > dongle | | There's your problem. Dongles = cheap hardware to patch | missing pieces of your expensive hardware. It's hard to | find good ones even if you want to. One of the big reasons | so many of us hated the TouchBar era of Macbooks was the | reliance on dongles, which inevitably flake out at the | worst times possible and cause weird bugs when you're | trying to concentrate. | deltarholamda wrote: | Heh, yeah, I had a Thinkpad with one of those PCMCIA cards | that had the pop-out RJ-45 jack. It was great, but it was | persnickety and would go "pfffbbblt" on the regular. | | The best Ethernet dongle ever was the AAUI ones you used to | have to use on old Macs. | Mikeb85 wrote: | Got some Samsung Galaxy Buds Live for my birthday and they're | honestly one of the best tech products I've ever used. The case | recharges them, the setup with a phone was very easy and worked | well, they pair perfectly with my Ubuntu laptop as well. Taking | them out of the case they automatically activate, put them in | the case automatically shut off. And so on. They do just work. | gregd wrote: | I have the Galaxy Buds as well as the 2nd Gen AirPods. I | cannot get the Buds to stay in my ears with any regularity | because all of the weight of the Buds, is out at the end that | is not in your ear. The AirPods have all of their mass inside | of your ear and stay put. | humantorso wrote: | Second this, Samsung Galaxy Buds just work. They fit | comfortably and imo look good. | jcranberry wrote: | Feel the same with the Galaxy Buds Plus. | | My SO has airpods pro and I find to be the main thing they | have over the GB+ is their talk through is vastly superior | and the noise canceling is also very good. | | The thing it doesnt have is a decent battery life. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | Y'know what headphones really did "just work" though? Wired | headphones, circa 2017. Their battery life was infinite. You | could "pair" them in seconds to any device with a headphone | jack, aka any device, because we're in 2017. Oh, and they were | cheaper and better for the environment. | | Courage, indeed. | | And this is why I'm currently typing my comment on an iPhone | 6S... | jhaile wrote: | Wired headphones also switch between devices almost | instantaneously. Or at least, when you unplug from one device | and plug into another, you're guaranteed to have it switched | to the right device. | | That being said, I use my Airpod Pros almost all the time, | because I'm hooked on wireless and being able to stand up and | walk around, etc. | duxup wrote: | I think it goes to show how much "just works enough " | consumers are happy to tolerate for wireless over other | advantages of wired. | | I remember early consumer wi- fi was just garbage compared to | wired and... we still used it happily. | | Granted sometimes we go back... my cars Bluetooth is so | maddening I use a cable instead. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | I agree, but I'm going to defend the wifi case a little. | Ethernet _doesn 't_ work if you're using a laptop, because | it defeats the purpose of having a portable computer in the | first place. You either have to be able to work offline, or | you have to stay next to an ethernet plug. | | I said above that wired headphones have infinite battery | life. I suppose I could say the same about a desktop | computer versus a laptop, but I don't think that would be | fair. | falcolas wrote: | FWIW, the proliferation of video calls over my laptop has | pushed me back to wired internet at my desk. Combined with | wired headphones - I have so much less latency than any of | my co-workers. It's nice to not have to play the "can you | hear me" song and dance. | ashtonkem wrote: | I did that until I updated the wifi in my house. There's | a combination wired/wireless wire plate under my desk, | but I don't bother wiring it into my work computer, | because the wifi is faster than what the cheap USB C | adapter can offer. | falcolas wrote: | Faster and lower latency are not the same things. | | > the cheap USB C adapter | | I have to ask, what kind of internet speeds do you have | where even a cheap wired adapter can't beat it? That's | pretty incredible. | duxup wrote: | You getting a lot of latency over wifi? | | I find wifi almost entirely dies around the time I get | wonky latency... but having said that everyone's wifi | situation is different depending on network, building / | home structure and etc. | ashtonkem wrote: | 950 down, 50 up. Wifi will pull 450 easy, but my hub will | only do 100, despite claims to the contrary. | | 450 is good enough for my use case, so it's easier to | just not worry about it and avoid running another wire up | the sit stand desk. If I upgrade my hub to something | that'll pull the claimed 1G, I might change. Or maybe | not. I dunno. Literally nothing I do on the internet can | get close to saturating it. | | Edit: wifi adds a mere 5ms of latency in my office. I | consider this beneath my notice for basically everything | but gaming. And even there it probably is meaningless | given my relatively low skill level. | vel0city wrote: | If your dock is only able to negotiate a 100Mbit | connection despite theoretically being 1000Mbit, and | you're experiencing dropped packets, it might not be your | dock. That sounds like an issue with ethernet cabling. | Bad cabling will usually result in ports not being able | to negotiate their max potential throughput, and | sometimes they'll negotiate higher than what they can | realistically do. | falcolas wrote: | > my hub will only do 100 | | Oof, that sucks. | | 5ms per round trip adds up, especially when you add in | every other source of latency in your chain. I've also | found that, thanks to general RF noise from _everything_ | being wireless these days, latency spikes occur much more | often over wi-fi than wired. | | YMMV, of course. Always worth measuring your own | experience. | ashtonkem wrote: | I went back to wireless specifically because I was | noticing issues on that hub. I went to the trouble to | setup control plane to disable wifi when Ethernet was | plugged in, and zoom performance _tanked_. Going back to | wifi solved it. I think that the adapter was dropping | packets, but I never bothered to triage since wifi works | great in this house. | | It's worth mentioning that my setup has very, very low | latency. Lag between me and the speed test server in city | is 5ms wired, 10ms wireless. My router is way overpowered | for what I ask of it, so throughput and latency tends to | be very good. | | To be fair, my wifi setup is a bit ... extra. I'm running | 5 APs, two switches, a controller, and a dedicated | router, with a dedicated AP for my office that's a combo | wired/wireless outlet. I've turned it down so that it's | basically only serving my office, and it has a dedicated | cat6 backhaul to the network cabinet, no sharing airspace | with other APs. If I hadn't gone to all this trouble, I'd | probably upgrade my hub and go wired. | baxtr wrote: | That's just not true. They never just worked for me at least. | | - Cables would get cluttered in my clothes | | - Cables would eventually all break at one point | | - The cables were a mess in a any jacket / bag | | - The microphone was making weird sounds when they hit my | face and and people would complain | | - etc. | csomar wrote: | > Wired headphones, circa 2017. | | I hope we never go back to those days. That constant struggle | with the wires, having to take the phone with you, too short | wire for desktop usage, the wire getting in the way when | moving/jogging, etc... | antihero wrote: | I found I was just getting sick of the faff and bulk with my | wired ATH-M50x + FiiO A3 amp. I have tried most of the big | bluetooth buds (Airpods 3, Buds Pro, XM4, Audio Technicas), I | absolutely hated them. | | I've ended up using the FiiO UTWS5 (over ear bluetooth hooks | that connect via standard IEM connectors) + Moondrop Katos, | the setup is sublime. Fantastic sound quality, very reliable | and great battery life with no faf and can fit it in my | pocket. | | If you still want wired, the Apple dongle actually has a | DAC/amp that is regarded surprisingly highly in the | audiophile headphone community. Just remember to charge your | phone. | | I think most of the mainstream options for wireless stuff | will make hi-fi enjoyers miserable, you just have to look at | something a bit more interesting. | | The only disadvantage is you don't get so much of the | supporting features. Ambient mode isn't great, there's no ANC | (I don't really care about these things), and it doesn't have | the fancy pair-switching integrated stuff, so wouldn't be | great if you switch between laptop and phone. | | But for audio, we've reached a point where it is absolutely | excellent. | ineedasername wrote: | What's a headphone jack? | frankfrankfrank wrote: | Caveat: This reply got a longer than intended and broadens a | bit, but please indulge me because I think you are also onto | something I have been scratching my head about for decades | now, amidst outrage for questioning tech dogma. | | I agree with you to an overwhelming degree. I also had an | iPhone 6S until about a year ago and I have to say the | upgrade to the iNext Pro was pretty underwhelming in many, if | not most ways when objectively evaluated. | | I have also had AirPods for however long they have been out | and even though I would agree with the rebuttal to your point | that many other BT headphones are notably even more glitchy, | I also paid about 5 times less for some of them that work | almost just as well in most ways and aspects. | | There seems to be an odd kind of self-delusion going on where | somehow whatever is new, is assumed to not only also be | better, but significantly better, when if one just takes a | first principles approach to evaluating that proposition, at | best you find marginal or incremental improvement of | diminishing returns. | | The 6S was released over 6 years ago, is it even doubly as | good, let alone exponentially more capable? There is a huge | hurdle in overcoming the reality that the answer is no. | | There is all this lamenting about sustainability and | environment this and climate change that, but for some | reason, e.g., an old Apple device (picking on them because I | believe they are the highest standard bar) cannot perform as | well due to simple UI and UX changes? | | There is seriously something wrong with the whole matrix and | I have not been able to get any kind of satisfactory answer | as to why, e.g., an old 1st (or 2nd) gen iPad Air all the | sudden cannot perform +h same simple, core tasks it performed | exceedingly well when it was new, that being loading safari | and less than demanding website like HN. | | What has changed in the 9 years since the 1st gen iPad Air | came out that all the sudden browsing is now an extremely | demanding task on the device? It seems like intentional and | fraudulent designed obsolescence. Where are the | environmentally concerned drawing attention to this like I | am? | | Just imagine if your car got updates every year, and then you | find that 9 years later all the sudden the same engine has | 100 less horsepower and can't get up a moderately sized hill | anymore. That's not suspect to anyone else? | | Again, I would love for someone to explain how I am wrong, | that I cannot expect a product I buy to retain the same | performance for the same actions/tasks when nothing else has | changed. Does the CPU age and die off? | | We should all be demanding that a device must retain its | performance in all aspects of the original function. | Everything else is fraud. Please for anyone compelled to, | refrain from your "you don't know how it works" comments, | that is not the case, nor helpful, and rather blind to | reality. | saberience wrote: | I've broken at least three or four pairs of wired headphones | in the gym/while working out getting them caught in something | and then the cable being jerked and broken, not the mention | the intense annoyance of the cable always ending up in a | horrible knot in my pocket. | | With my Airpods Pro, my original pair are working great, no | breakages, amazing for working out with, no cable to get | tangled. I love them. | Causality1 wrote: | Not to mention zero latency. Trying to have multiple people | in a car play music/podcasts is a nightmare over bluetooth | when you used to be able to just pass an aux cable around. | prox wrote: | I bought a Sony that does BT _and_ wired, I love the | whynotboth movement personally. Why do we have to choose? | KptMarchewa wrote: | WH-1000xm3 sound much worse when wired. They are made to | use internal DAC. | striking wrote: | You can turn them on, and they will use the wired input | but pass it through the nice internal DAC. | thebean11 wrote: | Wouldn't wired use the DAC on the device rather than the | headphones? I thought the 3.5mm jack carried an analog | signal. | writeslowly wrote: | Those Sony headphones do processing to the signal | regardless of whether you're using wireless or a 3.5mm. | They can still make sound with no power but it feels more | like a backup in case the battery is dead. It seems like | a sensible design decision given that most users will | want them turned on for noise canceling even if they're | wired. | ziml77 wrote: | That's his point. They're using the device's DAC when | wired which is why it doesn't sound as good as when using | Bluetooth through the headphones' DAC. | thebean11 wrote: | Sure but that's an issue with wired headphones in | general, not specific to these. | aceazzameen wrote: | I use my xm3 daily and don't notice a difference. I use | both methods of connection because sometimes it's quicker | to just plug in on some devices, and others it pairs | right away. Love these headphones. | piaste wrote: | That just means your phone's or PC's DAC is crappy | compared to the internal one, and any other headphones | would sound just as bad. | | I have an older pair of JBL E55, which are about 50% | cheaper than yours, and on a modern phone they sound | slightly better on wire than on wireless, presumably | because their internal DAC is mediocre. | iso1210 wrote: | In theory they could use an ADC to convert the analog | input to digital then run through the same DAC as | bluetooth goes | throwaway894345 wrote: | Don't forget the super fun untangling puzzle that you get to | solve before each use! Or the eardrum damaging fun of having | the buds ripped out of your ears every time the cord catches | on something. "Just works" indeed! | tptacek wrote: | I love wired headphones, but I have never had a pair whose | cable didn't short out within a year; I got to the point | where I'd buy replacement cables with the headphones. I've | got B&O's, NAD's, and Sennheisers, both open and closed, and: | I might as well keep them in a lighted display case, because | I never use them anymore. Once Apple came out with the Max | AirPods, I was done with wired headphones. I don't want to | be! But they're too much better a product. | heleninboodler wrote: | I think this is a fascinating aspect to the overall wired- | vs-wireless debate. Some people simply have a problem with | wires and some don't. I have three pairs of over-the-ear | wired headphones that have been with me for 7, ~10, and >20 | years, respectively, and none of them have ever had any | cable damage. I've never ended up with flaky wiring on a | cheap pair of apple earbuds, either. The very cheap earbuds | that came with my HTC G-2 did end up with flaky cables but | they're an aberration in my experience. Coincidentally, or | perhaps not, I really don't have any grudge against wires, | but I do loathe the fidgety connectivity of bluetooth. | | Of course, I'm also baffled about how everyone I know and | hear about seems to be unable to keep their macbook power | cable from self-destructing, and I just keep accumulating | them because they never die. My favorite one is still a | MagSafe 1 from, I think, 2012. | | [edit: in retrospect, perhaps the fact that I have a | "favorite" power cable is some kind of red flag. Re- | evaluating my life...] | sriku wrote: | Not to mention how the wired apple earphones are way better | in terms of audio quality during calls than airpods (own | both, and airpod "pro" to boot). Heck, during most calls, my | colleagues tell me that the sound is way better when I use my | macbook air builtin microphone than when I use my airpods .. | on zoom, ms teams, whatever. Not to mention how my airpods | pro started discharging in a skewed manner - with one ear | piece discharging faster than the other. None of these are | problems with the wired earphones. | powersurge360 wrote: | You can do both tbh. Wireless headphones are great because if | you charge them relatively frequently, they're a light, | painless pack. I'm pretty into high fidelity audio, but I'm | not going to be walking around w/ my DT 990 pros. But if I'm | out running errands, being able to break out the AirPods is | amazing. | | And realistically, it's not that significant to just buy an | adapter and keep it permanently affixed to your headphones. | Will be better if/when apple fully moves off of lightning to | usb-c but I have found that when I want a high fidelity | experience w/ music I'm more likely to be sitting and plugged | in anyways. | eddieh wrote: | Some people hate to be physically tethered to their desk from | their head. Maybe wireless headphones have to be paired and | charged, but that beats standing up an pulling your laptop to | the floor while your headphones are jerked off your head. And | nothing is better than being able to pace around while on a | call. | karaterobot wrote: | I own a pair of Airpods for work, and they're fine for a | couple hours of Zoom calls every day. For non-work, I have a | pair of headphones with a lightning input. It's still | annoying, because I can't charge my phone or transfer data | while listening to music, and I still disagree with Apple's | courageous decision to remove the 3.5mm jack, but it's an | okay solution. | the_snooze wrote: | Wired headphones have an amazingly simple, reliable, and | consistent pairing method with devices. Little kids and | senior citizens can operate wired headphones with ease. | ceejayoz wrote: | My wired headphones had a frustrating tendency to pair with | unwanted devices like elbows, chairs, desks, and other | protrusions. This tended to unpair them from either my | device or my ears. | | edit: Oh, and to themselves. Knotted up cords leading to | wires failing caused more than one set of mine to only work | in one ear. | chii wrote: | I used to be like you. Then i tried, for real, a pair of | bluetooth headphones. | | The disadvantages of the bluetooth is by far outweighed by | the wireless advantage. The mobility, flexibility and | convenience of no tangles and accidental wire pulling and | causing phone to drop - all worth it. | | And wireless UX is only going to get better. Wired is dead. | eertami wrote: | >Wired is dead | | For as long as we both live, manufacturers will make wired | headphones, and people will buy them. Latency and quality | might not be important to the casual user, but for some | wired headphones and speakers will be, and will always be, | essential. | xg15 wrote: | The mobility, flexibility snd convenience of me still | sitting on front of the same PC for eight hours? | ziml77 wrote: | I have a wireless headset for my PC and it's hard to go | back to wired. I have much nicer wired headphones, but I | rarely switch to them. Being able to get up and walk | around while not interrupting what I'm listening to is | great (yes desktop speakers would let me do the same but | they also let everyone hear what I'm hearing). Also with | wired headphones I had a constant issue where no matter | how I routed them, they would end up tangled in my chair. | It was super easy to think they were resting safely on my | desk, only to turn my chair and fling them to the floor. | nisegami wrote: | Use the right tool for the job. Sometimes that's wired | headphones. Sometimes that's bluetooth headphones. | [deleted] | dspillett wrote: | Though being able to use the right tool, in circumstances | where that is a wired set, can be a problem on some | platforms. | openknot wrote: | This is true (iPhones, iPads, and plenty of Android | phones these days), but can be mitigated by carrying a | USB-C to 3.5 mm audio adapter in the pouch that contains | the IEMs. I wish people didn't have to, but it's a | straightforward solution that widely improves wired | compatibility. | pritambaral wrote: | > ... that widely improves wired compatibility. | | "Wired compatibility" was ubiquitous before. It didn't | have room to "improve". Removing the jack is what broke | "wired compatibility". | | Needing a dongle for sth is not an "improved" form of | using it, when you could have just used it without a | dongle. | openknot wrote: | Adding a small adapter to where you carry your wired | headphones fixes the problem of the current reality where | many devices do not have audio jacks. My assertion is to | provide a practical solution to the current state of | affairs, instead of claiming that the present is better | than the past state of affairs (where there were | ubiquitous audio jacks) due to audio adapters. | | Due to forces beyond the individual's control, it's | highly unlikely that audio jacks will once more become | ubiquitous, so the second-best outcome is for wired | headphone users to start carrying an adapter. | [deleted] | criddell wrote: | The "right tool" might be an adapter or hub. | Cthulhu_ wrote: | I've got some Sony bluetooth / noise cancelling | headphones, I don't like the lag but that's only an issue | for videos and it switches to low latency (low quality) | for voice calls. But I really appreciate not managing a | cable, it's always in the way, or touching my arm or | something (some sensory things really annoy me while | sitting at a computer). Plus, great battery life. | | And it Just Works. Although my Mac has a tendency to | switch back to my speakers (also bluetooth) after ~15 | minutes without my input, that's really annoying. Might | have to do with the speakers turning themselves off? | Wowfunhappy wrote: | > And it Just Works. Although my Mac has a tendency to | switch back to my speakers (also bluetooth) after ~15 | minutes without my input, that's really annoying. | | So, what you're saying is, it doesn't just work! | | I promise I'm not trying to be sassy! This is _exactly_ | the type of issue I _always_ run into with wireless | audio, and basically never experience with wired | headphones. I hate these types of little, persistent | annoyances. | | I don't like wires either, to be clear, but I think | they're a small price to pay for their reliability. | heleninboodler wrote: | I agree completely. Little gnomes never sneak up on me | and switch the wire from one device to another, then | demand I go through weird unplug/plug rituals involving | four levels of deep-presses to get the thing connected | back to the device I want, all while 20 people are | waiting for me to start a presentation. The signal | doesn't randomly drop out or connect to the car that just | pulled in the driveway. The batteries don't go dead. | | The point is _predictability_. Wires have it, bluetooth | doesn 't. Yes, they predictably snag on things sometimes. | In my experience, this annoyance happens far less | frequently than any of the many annoyances that bluetooth | brings. | thow-58d4e8b wrote: | There's one major annoyance with Sony headphones and | earbuds - no way to mute/unmute yourself - you must walk | back to your laptop to do it. Why, oh why, Sony? | chrisseaton wrote: | Do you never get up to make a drink or something? | delecti wrote: | I will stick with wired headphones for the overwhelming | majority of usecases. There are just not enough downsides | to cables compared to never needing to switch audio devices | in a conferencing app, awkwardly change OS settings before | jumping on a call, or ever charging my headphones. | openknot wrote: | >The mobility, flexibility and convenience of no tangles | and accidental wire pulling and causing phone to drop - all | worth it. | | You can thread the wired headphone/IEM cord under your | shirt, or even over your ear and down your back [0] to | prevent tangles and wire pulling that causes a phone to | drop. | | It's less convenient than wireless earphones, but it solves | the problem, and comes with advantages (better noise | isolation and sound quality with certain models, plus you | don't need to worry about the batteries degrading and | having to buy a new pair after possibly 2-3 years, so you | save money). I'm considering switching back to wired after | my current AirPods pair dies for these advantages. | | >Wired is dead | | Not at all. You can get high-quality, professional | earphones (in-ear monitors or IEMs) that fit in a pouch in | your pocket, which are great for people in loud | environments (better than noise cancelling due to their | noise isolation); who appreciate music (sound quality is | noticeably better for any genre); or who do professional | audio work. | | [0] https://imgur.com/QOSNA9T | DangerousPie wrote: | Sure, you can work around the limitations of wired head | phones. But at the end it's just not worth the trouble | for many of us. I ditched my wired head phones years ago | and haven't regretted it. | munk-a wrote: | Or you can work around the limitations of wireless | headphones. At the end of the day both choices have | advantages and consumers can freely chose one or the | other (or both for different situations!) just so long as | no manufacturer is stupid enough to remove headphone | jacks from their mobile music devices we'll all be good. | The_Colonel wrote: | It's a dying breed, but there are still many phones with | audio jack. I don't think it will disappear completely. | strogonoff wrote: | Having cycled through WH1000XM3, XM4, AirPods Pro, I am | back to my trusty Shure SE215 that I use wired. | | -- They never deafen me with connected/disconnected | sounds (which can never be configured quiet enough) or | music briefly playing at insane volume after switching or | connecting. | | -- I know I get the source quality. | | -- I would never lose one randomly (always a chance with | "true wireless" models). | | -- I don't get weird phased low-frequency rumble from | active noise compensation gone wonky. | | -- Most of all, their passive noise suppression with | Shure's black sleeves, depending on exact noise profile | either beats or is on par with top-of-the-line active | isolation (both according to rtings' test benches and my | subjective experience), and does not end when battery | runs out inevitably at the most inconvenient time. | | Addendum: 1) I connect them via a tiny Ikko Zerda DAC, | which I started using way back when I still had a phone | with a headphone jack (this is subjective, but with | lossless sources I hear more detail--as in literally | small instrument parts I didn't hear before in complex | arrangements--compared to built-in DAC). 2) I generally | pass the wire under the top layer of clothing, and | personally taking an earbud out and letting it dangle is | about as difficult as switching on the transparent mode | on AirPods (and without audio degradation inherent to | such modes). | grp000 wrote: | As far as their SE215 model goes, the sound, isolation, | and ergonomics are great, but I've always had issues with | the cable breaking at the ear curve next to the | connection point to the earbuds. | greedo wrote: | It's been awhile since I used Shure's in ear monitors, | but they once sent me a kit with one of everything in | that part of their product line. Nice stuff, and if you | can tolerate in-ear stuff, incredible sound. But all the | cables failed over time. Not heavily used either. They | were great about sending replacements, but they were very | aware of the reliability issues. And these were monitors | that had MSRPs over $800. | strogonoff wrote: | Cables (as well as sleeves) are certainly the disposable | part of IEMs like these. Earbuds themselves proved | incredibly reliable to me (compared to AirPods Pro at | least, which I had to exchange once and which still had | problems after that). | | Also, SE215 cost much, much less than US$800. More like | $100. | grp000 wrote: | Yeah, I have two pairs of SE215s for convenience. But, | replacement OEM cables cost 20-30$, and maybe it's the | geometry of my ears, but I've had to replace 3-4 cables | by now, since the cables, OEM or not, kept failing at the | same section, at that metal wire you bend over your ear. | strogonoff wrote: | I see. Well, YMMV but you could try a different type of | cable. There are cables not using metal wires that you | bend around the ears, but the same thin flexible cable | throughout the entire length. I have not had problems | with one in more than a couple of years of use. | strogonoff wrote: | Now that you say it, I'm not using the original cable, | and I don't recall what happened to it because it's been | so long ago (could've been a similar issue to the one you | described). | | I couldn't find a Shure original cable to replace mine | with right away, so I got a compatible one and been | rolling with it ever since. It's slightly thinner, more | flexible and without the thicker malleable parts near | earbud connections. I was cautious about those | differences at first, but in the end grown to prefer it | more than the original, these thin wires wrap around my | ears just fine. | | As a side note, one of the things I treasure about the | design of these IEMs is the replaceability of the cable. | The IEMs themselves can probably survive for ages, which | gives a nice feeling among the increasingly disposable | electronics--I just hope the model would still exist on | the market when something eventually happens to my unit. | dimmke wrote: | It's also pretty much confirmed at this point that the next | pair of AirPods won't be using bluetooth - which they will | get a lot of shit for but is probably necessary to address | a lot of these issues. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | That also further increases the interoperability problem | though, if I can't use my headphones with non-Apple | devices even after going through the pairing dance. | (Unless Apple uses some other open protocol, which I | doubt!) | elondaits wrote: | I understand it'd be an issue to many people, but I had | Airpods for 5? years now and not even once paired them to | anything other than an Apple device. I have non-apple BT | speakers but don't have any BT transmitting devices that | aren't Apple... my LG TV maybe (which I use with an Apple | TV) but I assume pairing them would be a pain. | openknot wrote: | Yes, AirPods are currently surprisingly easy to switch | from an iPhone to a Windows laptop (click open the | Bluetooth menu and connect to AirPods), which is quite | similar to the behavior I use to switch between AirPods | and a Mac (I rarely use the "Switch to AirPods" | notification on Macs that pops up seemingly- | inconsistently). | thebean11 wrote: | I hope it's an open protocol that operates on WiFi | spectrum. Every implementation of Bluetooth is horrible, | and you start to wonder if the Bluetooth spec itself is | the issue.. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | Fwiw, Bluetooth _does_ operate on the same spectrum as | WiFi. But I agree about the Bluetooth spec. | ziml77 wrote: | I hope you mean the 5 or 6GHz range. Bluetooth already | runs at 2.4GHz, but that frequency band is cluttered as | all heck. | | An open protocol would be excellent though. | thebean11 wrote: | Yeah sure, I really don't know much about wireless | spectrum. It just needs to be something that existing | hardware supports. | criddell wrote: | If Apple does go proprietary you won't be any worse off, | assuming they still support Bluetooth (and I'd be very | surprised if they stopped supporting Bluetooth). | acomjean wrote: | They'll keep Bluetooth. The "find my" airtag eco system | depends on it. Plus car audio and external speakers. | | I always wonder if the removal of the headphone jack was | a ploy to get iPhone users to use Bluetooth so the find | my network worked better.. | vel0city wrote: | I don't think pushing users to Bluetooth is a ploy to get | more users to use Bluetooth. Toggling Bluetooth off only | means the user-land applications can't use Bluetooth, the | system might still use it for location-based services, if | those are enabled. The "Find My" network would probably | do a similar thing of piggybacking on such a feature. | freeflight wrote: | Is Apple working on their own proprietary Bluetooth or | what are future AirPods gonna use to connect? | mattnewton wrote: | I am still like OP. I have tried three pairs of airpods and | currently use a Bose Bluetooth headphones with an optional | attachable wire. Airpods are very painful for more than two | devices, get lost, go through the wash, forget the charging | cable, etc etc. The problem for me is that apple removed | the headphone jack even as an option, and many other phone | manufacturers copied that on all but their budget models. | rgreasons wrote: | If one of your concerns is that you end up washing your | headphones, you're right - I don't think you're ready for | wireless earbuds. | mattnewton wrote: | It's possible it wasn't your intent but this reads as | condescending to me. It implies a progression where | people can become "ready" to use a more advanced product | rather than the product not being a good fit for the | person which I think is a good way to blind yourself to | real product problems. Instead of just saying "people | drop their phones, maybe they aren't ready for expensive | things" you can realize the incredible market that phone | cases represent. Or in this case, maybe there is a market | for waterproof wireless earbuds that survive the wash, | that counteracts the additional manufacturing cost | (probably not, but maybe). | | Obviously the airpods are great for a great number of | people, and I bought them too. I think it's safe to say | Apple made good tradeoffs for their business. I ended up | switching back to heaphones with a wired option and then | switching phones to get a headphone jack because the | dongle annoyed me enough. I am very much in a minority - | don't get me wrong, apple will not miss my business. But | that they lost it should be a conscious decision as "this | won't work for everyone, but it will work for most people | really well by default" - not, "when people are ready for | it they will see the light". The former forces you to | acknowledge and quantify who it won't work for when | finding product market fit, and the later assumes you | don't need to do that. | silent_cal wrote: | Did you try putting the wire under your clothes or | something? | greedo wrote: | That's incredibly inconvenient and often uncomfortable. | rkangel wrote: | I agree. I only got a pair of earbuds because they cam free | with my phone but I was surprised by how lifechanging they | were. Not in an important way, but in a low key and | pervasive way. | | There are two situations where earbuds are far more | convenient: | | Getting ready in the morning - I can put the earbuds in | once I'm out of the shower and dried off and listen to a | podcast. They don't get in the way of getting dressed, | moving around etc.. This is just not workable with wired | headphones and my partner has already started work so I | can't use a speaker, and even if I could I'm moving between | different rooms and floors of the house. | | Driving - getting headphones out of your pocket, untangling | them and putting them in is basically impossible to do | (safely) while driving. But earbuds are never tangled I can | just open the case and put them in all while my eyes never | leave the road. Means I can make phonecalls or listen to | stuff easily and safely. This is a particular case of them | just being quicker and easier to put in than wired earbuds | - no having to thread it down your jumper just because you | want to watch a 5 minute YouTube video. | hnburnsy wrote: | Agreed, but I wonder why all the complaints about wired | headphones using a lightning\USBC 3.5 mm adapter. I don't | find it obtrusive, and the iPhone (and many phones now) can | be charged wirelessly when the adapter is in place. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | It's a problem when I need to plug my headphones into | anything that isn't an iPhone. Based on past experience, I | expect I would loose the adapter. | pmelendez wrote: | > Y'know what headphones really did "just work" though? Wired | headphones, circa 2017. | | And you know what's a major annoyance right? Untangling wired | headphones. | mcot2 wrote: | I'm surprised you are not using a typewriter. | treesrule wrote: | I still just my ath M50xs for everything, its lovely, but its | very annoying to use with my newer phone | acomjean wrote: | I upgraded my 6s finally.. and the lack of headphone jack is | frankly painful. I can't just plug into my car, home office, | and office headphones.. I lost the little dongle.. | | I think I'm going to buy 3 of those adapters and leave them | where I use my headphones. What a waste. | | Wireless changing helps the charge while listening though, so | that's a plus. | foogazi wrote: | > And this is why I'm currently typing my comment on an | iPhone 6S... | | You can get aux adapters for newer iphones for around $10 - | great for when you can't find your airpods | heleninboodler wrote: | I thought this was a pretty reasonable compromise, except | that whenever I need mine I can't find it. Today, I know | exactly where it is, but that's 15 miles away. The funny | thing about this problem is that the experience only | suffers on Apple devices when I can't find the dongle. I | can use my nice fancy favorite headphones everywhere else | with no problem. Apple is not about to convince me to toss | my favorite headphones just because they are stubborn about | headphone jacks; sorry. | | Note that it also causes a problem that bugs me daily, | which is that I can't use my headset when my power is low | and I need to plug my phone in. They make those little | "splitter" dongles that allegedly allow you to do both, but | in my experience, they only work about 50% of the time, and | while you're on your call, your phone secretly stops | charging and goes dead, or sometimes the moment you plug it | in, it puts up an alert that says "unsupported device" and | neither the power nor the headset work at all. I've tried | three or four different brands on three different iPhones | and they're all so flaky I've stopped even trying. I wish | Apple would just make one and stand behind the quality and | make me pay $10 for it. I'd be grumpy about it, but at | least it would work. | foogazi wrote: | You can use a wireless charger for this exact scenario | heleninboodler wrote: | My phone doesn't support wireless charging. | yepthatsreality wrote: | You may be interested in the Senheisser Momentum 3's which | have excellent connectivity and a fallback audio cable. | [deleted] | jrm4 wrote: | And also, you could pair them with your handheld device in | _1980._ | criddell wrote: | > Their battery life was infinite. | | That's true, but only because they used your device's | battery. | | It takes more power for your phone to drive headphones than | it does to transmit a bluetooth signal. This is not such a | big issue any more since recent phones have crazy long | battery life as do recent bluetooth headphones. In 2017 it | was a bigger issue. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | > It takes more power for your phone to drive headphones | than it does to transmit a bluetooth signal. | | ...are you sure? And, is that still true even once you | consider the extra encoding the phone's CPU has to do? | | I was under the impression that conventional 3.55mm jacks | output exceedingly little power... | criddell wrote: | It's true but there are a bunch of little caveats. How | big are the drivers, at what volume are you listening, | headphone impedance, etc... | | These days it really don't matter. Phone have ample | battery capacity. | falcolas wrote: | As someone who falls more in the "wired4life" category, the | power draw of headphones has never been an issue, Even back | in the naughts. That place of honor is reserved for | websites, apps, and cell radios. | | Ironically, with the loss of the 2.5mm jack power has a | greater chance to be an issue, since your headphones and | power have to occupy the same jack. | jon889 wrote: | Wired headphones took forever to put on though. You'd have to | untangle them when taking them out your pocket. And when | commuting I'd tuck the wire down my shirt so it didn't flap | everywhere and get caught on things, but that meant taking | your phone out your pocket pulled on it. | | I misplaced my AirPods for a bit a while ago and switched to | wired headphones and couldn't believe I had put up with it | for years before I got AirPods. | pohl wrote: | I prefer not being at the end of a leash. To each, their own. | pessimizer wrote: | A hook is so much better than a leash? | culopatin wrote: | You know what just works? Natural sounds from your | environment. No need for equipment, no wires to snag, no | pairing or plugging, you could even do it in your sleep. Oh, | and it is zero emissions. | | Courage, indeed. | | And this is why I am not even typing this. I'm just imagining | things, because it's free and good for the environment. | p1mrx wrote: | https://www.theonion.com/i-have-an-ipod-in-my- | mind-181958401... | renewiltord wrote: | Hahaha perfection. I love you. | karmakaze wrote: | Sound quality via wired audio is also much better, unless | your particular phone doesn't have decent DAC/analogue | circuitry. I can't bring myself to listen to music on | wireless. I don't even know that Apple takes advantage of | their walled garden to do better than the usual Bluetooth | protocols. | | > From https://9to5mac.com/2021/12/30/apple-airpods- | bluetooth-limit... | | > One of the most notable comments in the interview came from | Geaves when asked whether Bluetooth could be "holding back" | the AirPods hardware and "stifling sound quality. In his | response, Geaves danced around criticizing Bluetooth | directly, but acknowledged that Apple would really like a | wireless standard that allows for more bandwidth. | yoz-y wrote: | Honestly, the fact that I no longer snag my earphones on | random protrusions, like doorknobs and bus ticket validating | machines is a bliss. Cables inside at a desk: sure, why not. | Cables outside: hard pass. | [deleted] | ricardobayes wrote: | Haha yes. I remember rocking my HD580's with their awkward | 12' cable plus an adaptor for the 1/4" plug outdoors. Kids | these days have it a bit more easy. | [deleted] | cecilpl2 wrote: | I found that I could solve the snagging problem by just | running by headphone cable through my shirt. | kitsunesoba wrote: | This is my approach. At my desk? Sure, wired is fine. Even | have a full DAC/amp setup (JDS Labs Element II) that I plug | my trusty old Sennheiser HD6XX's into. | | While I'm up and moving around, or relaxing on my bed | watching something on my iPad with a cat that has an | inclination to chew on cables? AirPods/Bluetooth. | throwawayboise wrote: | I know this comes off as sounding like an old man, but you | could also just walk around without your ears plugged up | and pay attention to your surroundings. | wtetzner wrote: | I used to just put the cable under my shirt. | Dumblydorr wrote: | Just pass the cord through your shirt or under your jacket. | #innovation #thinkdifferent #buymystock | Cthulhu_ wrote: | I'd pass the wires through my shirt, keep them from | snagging or pulling my ears too much. | richrichardsson wrote: | Seems so obvious, how could anyone not realise this after | one time of snagging the cord when it's outside of | clothing? | squeaky-clean wrote: | This works but then all my music has a muffled rubbing | sound from the cable that reaches my ears while I walk | around. This is what I used to do, but wireless is still | better IMO for headphones on the go. | dpark wrote: | I used to wear my wired earbuds like this at times. They | would still snag (though less frequently). The cord has | to exit my shirt to get into my pants pocket and that's | where they would snag. That plus snagging on jacket | zippers at the neck. | | Plus the annoying telephonics that the wires cause was | enough for me to finally buy wireless earbuds. Yes, I can | try to route the wire under my shirt. Yes, I can try to | wrap the wires around my ears to cut down on the | telephonics. But all that is more hassle than dealing | with Bluetooth. | munk-a wrote: | Back in the day I made good use of those oversized jacket | pockets to pop my CD player in - then you just run the | cable up under your shirt and you're good to go. | | It's surprising how little of a hassle headphone cables | can be - I understand that the market is going elsewhere | but I've stuck with wired and couldn't be more content. | This does have the side effect that I've been soft locked | out of Apple phones though, so I switched over to Android | devices. | rejor121 wrote: | Back in my day I used my tape player the same way. Plus | it was smaller and more compact than those new fangled cd | players! | AdamN wrote: | The lightning to 1/8" adapter is <$10 and very small. | Works 100% of the time. | toyg wrote: | I agree, but the awkward "omg an airpod fell off after | bumping into something/someone" is also a real thing. They | should have an optional cord between the pair. | FunnyLookinHat wrote: | This is exactly why I have the old-school style with a | wire connecting them that sits on the back of your neck. | I had my toddler rip an earbud out just once for me to | realize that was a design feature I had to have. As an | added bonus, I find they're way easier to throw on and | off (just loop them around your neck and tuck them in | your shirt) in between tasks. | | Something like this: https://en- | us.sennheiser.com/headphones-bluetooth-momentum-f... | chasd00 wrote: | > I had my toddler rip an earbud out | | and then put it directly into their mouth right (airpods | are the perfect choking size)? Yeah, i can totally see | the need to have them attached together in that | situation. heh what is it about toddlers that makes them | constantly try to kill themselves. | jyounker wrote: | Curiosity. | drewzero1 wrote: | I had the opposite experience - I had the ones with a | wire between them when my kid was a baby and had to stop | using them as soon as he was able to grab things. That | wire was so tantalizing and the buds got forcibly ripped | out of my ears every time! I switched to some very cheap | (and relatively large = easier to grab out of a small | mouth if necessary) AirPod knockoffs and only put in the | ear on the other shoulder from where I was holding the | baby. | | Now he's older and when he gets hold of them he tries to | put them in his ear rather than his mouth. I've been | cutting down on wearing them when I'm around him anyway, | since he's copying everything now. | sdze wrote: | in-ear will never work for me. I feel raped when I have | to put them into the ear canal. | Tronno wrote: | The problem with this design is that anything that rubs | or bounces against the cable transmits sound into your | ear (like a children's cup telephone). This makes them | annoying to use while exercising. I find that the style | connected by a solid hoop mostly avoids this. | pjc50 wrote: | I have a pair which have a cord between them _and_ hooks | over the outside of the ears, because regular headphones | don 't retain in my ears. I don't think I could last even | a day with airpods without losing one of them. | mavhc wrote: | Do you have the model number? | jdpedrie wrote: | From a sibling comment: | | > Aftershokz Aeropex, silly name aside, is a decent | product that gets you a Bluetooth device you can wear all | day without losing | | Make sure if you get bone induction headphones that you | test them out in louder environments before running or | getting them dirty. For me, I had to turn them up so high | when outside with normal street noise that they gave me a | pretty terrible headache. | ktc1 wrote: | >I had to turn them up so high when outside with normal | street noise that they gave me a pretty terrible | headache. | | You have to be really careful doing that. It's very easy | to screw up your ears with bone conduction headphones if | you try to drown out background noise by increasing the | volume. | wintermutestwin wrote: | This cord works (although I found that they helped to | pull the airpods out of my ear): | https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B089B5T9L7?psc=1 | | These hooks are a much better solution: | https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B089B5T9L7?psc=1 | Despite their flimsiness, they have not failed on me once | while running, etc. | | Both of these "solutions" have the obnoxious problem of | needing to be removed to charge the airpod. The | Powerbeats Pro has built in hooks that are nice and | sturdy, but the case is obnoxiously massive compared to | the airpods case. | | My problem is that I must have freakishly small ear | canals, because neither of these earbuds actually fit | into my ears - despite trying nearly every aftermarket | replacement eartip. | | The Shokz openrun pro doesn't need to go into my ear and | kinda works, but the sound quality sucks for music and | the head loop protrudes from the back of my head and | isn't adjustable. | | Over ear headphones don't work with hats or bike helmets, | so those are only good sometimes. | | My next step is to pay $150(!!) for a custom piece of | silicon to attach to the airpods (which will still have | to come on and off for charging): https://www.adv- | sound.com/products/eartune-fidelity-custom-f... | | I guess I could pay $500 for these: https://www.adv- | sound.com/products/m5-tws-custom | | Or maybe I could get surgery to enlarge my ear canal | (haha) | | If anyone reading this has any better advice, I'm all | ears (hahaha) Sigh - | Brave-Steak wrote: | curioussavage wrote: | Just got AirPods 3 and pro to try out and I have not had | it just fall out that way with either. | | I have fumbled with the 3s while trying to remove them | while walking. I think it's the stem and how light they | are. | Zircom wrote: | Don't know if Apple sells them but they do make third | party neck things that slip around the stems and are | basically what you're asking for. | 33084901 wrote: | I use the "PowerBeats Pro" for this. I don't know if | they've been updated with some of the newer features, I | bought mine a couple years back when they came out. | sjm-lbm wrote: | The current version of the Powerbeats Pro has separate | buds for each ear, but I have the newest revision of the | regular Powerbeats for this exact reason. | | They even have the H1 chip and all of the quick | pairing/built-in Apple magic that Airpods do. | elondaits wrote: | Beats Flex have the same BT chip as the AirPods and a | different design that holds both ear pieces to the back | of your neck. | gumby wrote: | An eyeglass strap works great for this. Put the loops | around the airpod stems instead of the eyeglass arms. | brirec wrote: | I've thought about this, but y'know they won't fit into | the charging pod anymore with something (anything, | really) on them. | gumby wrote: | I only endorse this approach for when exercising | outdoors, riding the train etc. | | And actually most of the time when I'm outside the house | I prefer to be able to hear my environment, for safety | reasons. | rattray wrote: | Aftershokz Aeropex, silly name aside, is a decent product | that gets you a Bluetooth device you can wear all day | without losing | __MatrixMan__ wrote: | Agreed. They're pretty great. | seized wrote: | Shure as well, one you use the over the ear loop style | it's hard to downgrade to anything else. | rattray wrote: | Which ones are you referring to? | LeonenTheDK wrote: | I've got these, bluetooth on them works great, and the | bone conduction is really interesting. It's really nice | being able to hear your surroundings while having some | kind of audio playing. Or if you don't want the | surrounding sound, they come ear plugs. Really | comfortable to have on too, I barely even notice them (if | at all) when I'm wearing them. | | Should be mentioned though, for the price the music | quality is worse than what you'd get with other devices. | It reminds me of a higher quality phone speaker. | Definitely not bad compared to some headphones I've used, | but it's not amazing. Hasn't been an issue for me though, | I happily use them when working. Voice audio sounds | perfectly fine. IMO you get them for the other benefits, | not because they're the best sounding thing on the | market. | rattray wrote: | Agreed. They're great for walking around outside while on | a phone call, listening to a podcast, or listening to | music while exercising outdoors - not for "getting into | the music". Airpods are better at doing both, based on | what I've heard. | connerpeirce wrote: | I love my aeropex, but i'd be half inspired to write a | similarly styled article about the annoying uniform beep | notification UX- especially if you've paired with | multiple devices and one is not quite in range. | chris37879 wrote: | That's exactly what I use. I have a set of airpod pros I | use most of the time, but I can't stand having my ears | sealed all day, and having waterproof ones I an wear in | the shower is awesome. | | My only gripe with them is that the quality is way lower | than even fairly cheap normal ear buds, so I mostly use | them for podcasts and books. | jfoster wrote: | https://twitter.com/search?q=airpods%20toilet&f=live | neutronicus wrote: | Yeah, and Bluetooth phones / buds are much better for | running. | | I used to jerk my wired earbuds out of the jack all the | time. | jeffwass wrote: | Do you wear a headband or something else to secure them? | | I haven't tried running with my AirPods yet, as I feared | they would eventually fall out. | colinmhayes wrote: | I can shake my head around like crazy and my airpod pros | don't fall out. Never had them fall out running which I | try to do 3 times a week either. | newsclues wrote: | Nope, if AirPods fit your ears they stay in. I have first | gen set that I still use for biking and big drops or | bumps have zero effect. | dont__panic wrote: | I used to run with AirPods multiple times a week, and | used them while walking around and on public transit. | I've done the same with AirPods pro borrowed from my S.O. | | Did they ever fall out? Only a small portion of the time. | Half the time I noticed it and caught them. | | Was the _idea_ of them falling out stressful? Hell yeah. | Nothing like a $50+ bud to stress the hell out of you | when you 're trying to get a run in and it just will. | not. sit. in. your. ear. correctly. Add sweat to the | equation and things get messy quick. And the fact that in | some places, like public transit, you have a good chance | of losing the bud forever if it falls out. | | I am much happier with the IEMs I've been using for a | half a year or so now. They hook over my ears optionally, | so they're never really in danger of falling out and I | never have to mess with them. And they're wired to me | anyway even if they do fall. | neutronicus wrote: | I have Pixel Buds and I haven't tried running with them | yet (it's been cold since I got them for Christmas). | | I used to run with Bluetooth over-ear headphones, which | was great in winter, and, uh, less great in summer (the | foam would get completely soaked and foul-smelling). | | The ear supports on the Pixel Buds are pretty secure, | though, I expect it to be OK, especially at my pace. | rdedev wrote: | My go to solution for such annoyances is to pass the cable | through the inside of my shirt. Not the most elegant | solution but saved me a lot oh headache :D | mattnewton wrote: | There are pros to wireless headphones and the right choice | for many people, but the choice has been made for all | people who do not experience that. I personally use Bose | over ear heaphones that have an optional cable you can | attach and connect and it has come up an incredible number | of times. There is so much pain if you switch for more than | two devices, forget to charge, at unsure something is | paired, etc that all goes away with having a cable option | for when it is more convenient. | dont__panic wrote: | Exactly. Removing the headphone jack is incredibly | hostile to those of us who want to use wired headphones, | and clearly motivated by the insane profits of wireless | earbuds. And the worst part? It's working. Just look at | the AirPods business and you'll see exactly why Apple | does it. | | For myself, I'm sticking with an older phone and IEMs | with replaceable cables. Super happy with it because I'm | OK with the tradeoff of dealing with the wire instead of | dealing with batteries and replacements every 2-3 years. | So sure, Apple has made some profit off of wireless buds. | But they could make even more profit by adding a | headphone jack and allowing folks who want wireless buds | to use them. (no, dongles and lightning headphones do not | solve this issue -- I want to be able to use the same | connector for all my devices, and I want to be able to | use it while charging) At least add it to the SE, for | Pete's sake. | flavmartins wrote: | You could always get the dongle to support the wired | headphones. My teen daughter is using it now that she has | lost her airpods. | vinceguidry wrote: | Tried it, Apple-made dongles fail with incredible | frequency, and non-Apple made ones just don't work. | dpark wrote: | > _But they could make even more profit by adding a | headphone jack and allowing folks who want wireless buds | to use them._ | | How would this generate more profit for Apple? | jamestanderson wrote: | For one thing, I'd buy an iPhone again. | dpark wrote: | I wonder how many people have actually stopped buying | iPhones due to the removal of the minijack. I bet it's | noise to Apple's revenue. I also expect that they save | more in the hardware simplification than they lose on | sales. | dont__panic wrote: | Probably not a lot. But it's one of those "death by a | thousand cuts" things I can't ignore in an iphone | purchase. Between that and the fingerprint reader, I'm | out. If they brought either back I could justify it. | frosted-flakes wrote: | The iPhone SE2 has a fingerprint reader. It's a lower | quality device though. | wruza wrote: | Looking at my SE2 right now. What you mean lower quality? | (Btw it has no minijack) | frosted-flakes wrote: | Not flagship. Non-OLED screen, single rear camera, no | face recognition, smaller battery, etc. | | GP's requirements were _either_ a fingerprint sensor or | headphone jack before switching. | throwaway_Aef8 wrote: | Heequaet4geongeel1bag0xie9inaB4u | Ntrails wrote: | I really do miss my headphone jack. Not being able to | charge and listen to music at the same time is dumb as | hell. | | However, my 6 was proper dying, so once they bought out | the SE or whatever with a sensible form factor and | fingerprint scanner I was convinced it was better than | trying to switch | jamestanderson wrote: | I'm sure it's 100% worth it for them financially. Me not | buying an iPhone because it doesn't have a headphone jack | means nothing to them. | | I think what will hurt them in the long run is their | pattern of user-hostility will start to affect their | image. For instance: | | * Right to repair gaining steam (Apple now introducing | some basic form of parts availability) | | * Apple eroding their image as a Privacy company (Apple | had to delay their "child safety" tools after public | outcry) | | * iMessage lock-in (Apple users "bullying" Android users | due to Apple's hostile UI choices). | | Those are just the recent examples that come to mind. | | It'll all add up until Apple has a PR problem that | actually does start affecting their bottom line, and then | they'll have to make concessions that'll make people | happy again. | dpark wrote: | > _but the choice has been made for all people who do not | experience that_ | | What are you talking about? Is someone stopping you from | using wired earbuds? | wtetzner wrote: | You're not technically stopped, you just have to pay | extra money to get an adapter, with the additional | downside that you can no longer charge the phone while | using those headphones. | twothumbsup wrote: | Or, if you get a wired->BT adapter like the FiiO uBTR, | it's another device you have to remember to keep charged. | | (Btw there are 3.5mm to lightning adapters that let you | charge while listening, just not made by Apple) | dpark wrote: | Did they stop including the dongle in the box? I haven't | bought phone in a couple of years so I honestly don't | know. | | I can understand the complaint about charging. Although | the fanboy answer is of course wireless charging. | diebeforei485 wrote: | They've stopped including it, but they sell it for $9 | with free shipping. | | The next thing to go will be the physical SIM card tray - | takes up a similar amount of space which is better | utilized for battery capacity or other features, and also | makes for easier waterproofing if removed. | twothumbsup wrote: | They stopped including it a while ago, I think they | stopped with the XS. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | For me, it's not the cost or the ability to charge my | phone, but the fact that the adapter can get lost. I | can't leave it plugged in because I use my headphones | with non-iPhone devices too. | | I perpetually loose my headphones anyway. If I had an | adapter too, I'd find myself unable to listen to anything | twice as often. | tarboreus wrote: | The old jack was also more solidly connected than the | current inclement weather port (sorry, can't remember | ifit's lightning, thunderbolt, or wizard strike). | ljm wrote: | I always feed the cable down the back of my neck and | underneath my shirt or jumper. The bonus is that I can take | them out of my ears and they'll dangle like a necklace, so | I can tuck those under my shirt as well. | robohoe wrote: | This was such a big issue with my wired Sony headphones. | Can't tell you how many I've gone through. | | On another hand, I've a pair of Bose wireless headphones | for close to 6 years now. Battery is still good enough for | 2+ hours of workout. | CalChris wrote: | Yes. _Mobility_ is why I got the Air Pods Pro to begin | with. I don 't use them with my Air and I don't even want | them to pair with my Air; wired ear buds are fine (and | cheap!) for that. But they're great for walking and working | out. The Air Pods Pro even stay in my ears while erging. | | Still, the OP's complaints are valid. But when they work, | which is most of the time, they're great. Surprisingly (but | not insanely) great. | saimiam wrote: | Tangent but what's "erging"? Never heard this before and | the spellcheck has a red squiggly below it, so it has not | heard of it either. | greeneggs wrote: | Indoor rowing | treetoppin wrote: | It refers to rowing on a stationary rowing machine, the | kind you would see at a gym | pkage wrote: | Erging is rowing on an indoor rowing machine. They were | originally called an "ergometer," which was then | shortened down to just an "erg" over time. | | It's a really great exercise, and pretty good training | for rowing crew (though it's not quite like the real | thing). | [deleted] | justinpowers wrote: | Shorthand for "using an indoor rowing machine" | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoor_rower?wprov=sfti1 | silent_cal wrote: | You can just run the wire under your shirt/jacket | Godel_unicode wrote: | For a while, most of the hoodies I bought for workouts | actually had a cutout in the kangaroo pocket for routing | headphones inside of them. The newer ones don't though, | you'd have to cut it yourself. | swah wrote: | Ditto. And since we now wear masks at the office, one | notices how wireless earbuds are "mask compatible" when you | try using cabled ones. | pessimizer wrote: | Wired earbuds are amazing with masks. If you put them on | before you put on the mask, when you need to take one off | to hear something, the mask straps hold it conveniently | hanging near your ear. A fumbled airpod rolling across | the floor is not an improvement. | falcolas wrote: | Really? I always see them go flying when taking off a | mask to eat or drink. The random protrusions to escape | the faraday cage that is your head don't seem to interact | well with elastic loops. | bravetraveler wrote: | I get that no cables can be nice and convenient, but | routing the wire through a shirt/jacket helps avoid getting | caught | | edit: lol, an instant downvote - didn't realize I was on | Reddit. It was at best a suggestion for when you _have_ to | get by with cabled headphones. I 'm not on some holy war. | [deleted] | toxik wrote: | Cars these days are the same -- you know what didn't need | fancy pants computer tools to diagnose? Horses. Let's bring | back horses. | 6510 wrote: | You might love your car, the horse will love you back. | taneq wrote: | I, too, have a 6S and my travel headphones are wired. Partly | because they work with any device with a headphone jack, | partly because of the battery life issue, but mostly because | of my phone slips down the side of the aeroplane seat I can | fish the bugger back up again with the headphone cord! | rockostrich wrote: | Yea, but can you just get up and use the bathroom while still | listening in a meeting with wired headphones? | Anderkent wrote: | if they're plugged into my phone, sure | | if i'm on the laptop, by the time i take five paces away | the sound quality on bluetooth is so bad it's basically | unusable anyway | whateveracct wrote: | My laptop headphone jack is 1-2ft away from me during every | video call and I still prefer AirPods (on Linux no less!) | megapolitics wrote: | >Their battery life was infinite. | | However, the life of the cable was a few months at best in my | experience. | guggle wrote: | I'm smiling at this while enjoying music on my 20 years | unmodified Senheiser HD25. | mcronce wrote: | What were you doing with your headphone cables? I've been | using the same one with my current pair since I bought them | three years ago. Prior to switching to cans, I used the | same set of cheap wired earbuds for five years - and | they're still working | 0xcde4c3db wrote: | I've had cables go bad in multiple sets of headphones | that I barely even used, let alone subjected to the | expected rigors of travel or heavy use. As far as I can | tell, a lot of cheap 3.5mm plugs have strain relief | that's basically just ornamental, and even a modest | amount of flexing or vibration will quickly break one of | the wires. | megapolitics wrote: | >What were you doing with your headphone cables? | | Getting them caught on door handles, mostly. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | Well, you had to pay more for better headphones with better | cables. But wireless headphones are expensive anyway. (And | have non-replaceable batteries which will also permanently | die after a couple years.) | ziml77 wrote: | The best cables still break when they're moving a lot. | The important thing is for the headphones to have | replaceable cables. But only the high-end headphones and | earbuds have that feature. | soylentcola wrote: | I can only speak from my own experience, but I've been | using the same set of wired KZ ZSN in-ear-monitors for | the past few years. They're nothing ground-breaking, but | they cost under $25. | | The wires loop back behind my ears so they don't get | pulled out easily, the wires have yet to short out, and | they are replaceable in case I ever want or need to | replace them. I almost always use them with my phone, so | the USB-C-to-3.5mm dongle that came with my phone is | typically attached to the end. | | I don't mean to shill for this or any other brand in | particular, but I'm pretty sure there are several | affordable, decent quality earbuds/IEMs out there with | replaceable cables. | dont__panic wrote: | Replaceable cables are a game changer in this space. The | buds will last for years and years, and make up the bulk | of the cost of a set. The cable could get ruined by one | unlucky event... but if you have a couple of backup | cables like me, it doesn't really matter. You can buy | replacement cables off of Aliexpress for <$10. | ericmay wrote: | I wouldn't let the lack of a headphone jack deter you from | upgrading a phone if you wanted. You can get one of those | adapter things and just leave it attached to your headphones | if you wanted. I know people think it's annoying that you | even have to do this but it's an option. I bet you can get | one for free from a friend even. | | I do have a nostalgic feelings for the iPhone 4s and | headphones. I wish there were products out there that excited | me in the same way my first iPhone did. | Wowfunhappy wrote: | > You can get one of those adapter things and just leave it | attached to your headphones if you wanted. | | The problem is that I'd have to unplug that adapter to use | my headphones with a device other than my phone, including | other Apple devices like my Macbook. I would subsequently | loose the adapter, guaranteed. | | If the world could agree to use USB-C for everything, that | might work, but Apple--who started this mess--is a prime | holdout there. | ericmay wrote: | Yea I agree, just offering a solution. I am excited for | Apple to switch to USB-C for the iPhone as well. It's | quite irritating that it's not... one cable to rule them | all! But then they went and added HDMI and SD back to the | Mac, so now they have a better argument since they aren't | actually doing the one-cable approach. | enaaem wrote: | For out of the house, I would never go back to wired in-ears | anymore. Untangling cables and the occasional yank out of | your ear is not user friendly. | | For outside, I actually find wireless headphones to sound | better for three main reasons: | | - Better fit. Proper fit is essential for good sound and I | rarely get a good fit on wired in-ears due to the constant | pull on the cord. | | - Microphonics (cable rubbing noise). Microphonics is very | obvious and annoying. It is far more obvious than for example | the difference between AAC and lossless. Audiophile reviewers | hardly ever evaluate microphonics, because they test under | ideal conditions behind their desk. Cable noise is not | considered part of the driver's sound signature, but in real | life it has a huge impact of what comes in your ear. | | - Noise cancelling. Music sounds better without bus engine | sounds. | OJFord wrote: | > Noise cancelling. Music sounds better without bus engine | sounds. | | That's nothing to do with wireless though? | | I'm a bit of a convert to (Anker .. 'SoundCore P2' I think) | wireless earphones (AirPod style, not sports-style-round- | back-of-neck), but for ages I used noise cancelling wired | earphones, with a little Bluetooth receiver when I wanted | them wireless that I thought was the best of both worlds. I | now think no wire at all is nicer though. (But probably not | if I had to pay Apple prices! These Anker ones were PS30.) | iqanq wrote: | After using airpods I am never ever going back to wired | headphones. | Razengan wrote: | I am sorry but you must be downvoted to prevent your | counter opinion from being seen. | astura wrote: | Yeah, I thought wireless headphones were a gimmick I didn't | need, I didn't want to worry about having to charge | headphones, etc. | | I ended up with a pair and turns out wireless headphones were | a giant QOL improvement. I can run around do chores while my | computer/phone charges upstairs and listen to music at the | same time. I'd never use earbuds though, I absolutely can't | stand anything inside my ear canal. | | I still want my phone/computer to have a headphone jack in | it, and mine does. | [deleted] | asdfsd234234444 wrote: | lol | bart_spoon wrote: | They also snagged on everything, got tied up in knots in your | pocket, the wires would give out all the time requiring you | to buy new ones, were obnoxious to use when exercising, and | limited the physical distance you could move from the device | you were using to about 2 feet. | | There are issues with wireless headphones, but they also | solve a _lot_ of genuine problems with wired ones. | whizzter wrote: | A combination is the best, got some cheap noise cancelling | JBL BT phones and if you plug a cable it'll always use that | (they even work as dumb headphones when turned off), pull the | cable and they'll happily go for BT. | huntermeyer wrote: | MPOW M30 just work for me. | awestroke wrote: | Funny, I've had all those problems and more with my Airpods | Pro. | | The most annoying one is that if I pair my Airpods to my mac, | they stop auto connecting to my android phone even when they | are not in range of my mac. Probably by design | blinkingled wrote: | > OP should try using another brand of Bluetooth headphones for | a week | | Extensive user of various BT headphones on Android for few | years now - went through everything from cheap Corwin E7 to | Galaxy Buds to Bose QC to latest one Sony WH-1000XM4 - had | minor issues with the Galaxy Buds - had to wiggle them in the | case to get the charging going but other than that all of the | other ones work really well - Sony being the king of the hill - | even two devices work as expected and the sound quality is | good. | klmr wrote: | I'm a huge fan of the Sony high-end line, and am currently | using the WH-1000XM4 myself. They're excellent, but they do | share quite a few of the annoyances listed in the OP article | (in particular the delay when going from call to audio and | vice versa, and the audio quality degradation; though, truth | be told, I believe that's a macOS issue), and they have their | own annoyances. Most prominently, the utterly useless "second | device pairing" audio message that plays for a full _four | seconds_ and drowns out whatever else you were listening to. | I routinely need to ask people on a call to repeat what they | said because of this. Yet Sony arrogantly states that this | message is somehow "important" and therefore can't be | disabled. | blinkingled wrote: | Oh yeah I forgot about the second device pairing message - | definite annoyance! I actually have used it with work macOS | laptop (Big Sur) a few times but did not notice anything | odd. | TurningCanadian wrote: | I believe the audio quality degradation when using the mic | is a limitation of Bluetooth bandwidth. It switches to a | different profile capable of sending and receiving audio | instead of only receiving. | klmr wrote: | Yes, it switches to a different audio codec, that's | unavoidable due to bandwidth limitations. However, macOS | insists on using a worse codec than necessary (SCO | instead of SBC) and, at least with my MX4 headphones, | this badly scrambles audio, at least intermittently. I've | stopped using the headphone microphone because it was | unbearable. I've tried playing with the bluetooth | settings but nothing seems to fix this. | eptcyka wrote: | It's definitely not an issue with bandwidth, instead it's | an issue of standardization. There just doesn't exist a | bluetooth profile that supports high quality duplex audio | communications between two devices. It's pathetic. | RealityWinner wrote: | It doesn't exist because of bandwidth... | eptcyka wrote: | I struggle to believe that Bluetooth 5, which supposedly | allows for a total of 2mbit/s transfer can't allow for a | better codec to be used when a stereo stream of SBC is | about 300kb/s. However, I'll be the first to admit that | bluetooth is not my area of expertise, and my statement | here is mostly driven by disbelief about the fact that we | can't get better audio quality out of a bluetooth headset | these days. | | EDIT: Oh wait, the reason HSP uses low bandwidth codecs | is because the standard makes a trade-off in favor of | latency and non-blocking comms. Clearly, there are good | reasons. | archepyx wrote: | FredFS456 wrote: | I have a pair of XM4s, I could never get two devices (Ubuntu | laptop and Android phone) to work right without getting | atrocious sound quality ("headset/handsfree profile") on one. | windexh8er wrote: | > I recently switched to a pair of Sony Bluetooth headphones as | I don't like the too-neutral AirPods Pro EQ curve, and while | they sound excellent, the UX really leaves a bit to be desired. | | I, personally, don't understand this. I'm a bit of a stickler | for making sure my audio quality is good. I validate the | products I'm using sound good using local device recording as | well as HD echo test numbers before I use them during real life | meetings. I'm on the phone at least a couple hours a day and | it's baffling how many people assume that their AirPods sound | good. The TL;DR of it is - they don't. | | But with respect to the "UX" side of the house, I'm curious | what you really need? I own a number of Jabra and Sony products | that I can - pull out of their cases on any day at any point in | time and they will work with no input from me. Do people fiddle | with EQ and other settings often? The only thing I really do | once I get the audio setup is make sure the firmware is up to | date from time to time. | easton wrote: | How many devices do you use your wireless headphones with? If | it's >1 (or maybe 2), the experience is horrid in my | experience even with the AirPods unless (in the AirPods case) | they are all Apple devices with logic in the OS for handing | off the connection. | | I could not use my AirPods with my old Windows laptop because | everytime it got in range it would steal them away from any | device, even sometimes when in sleep (the Surface Pro's | crappy sleep mode may have had something to do with it). | IshKebab wrote: | I have Google's Pixel Bud A series and they have none of these | issues to be honest. By far the biggest issue is that they | don't let you connect to more than one device simultaneously. | Fine if you only use them with your phone, but a pain if you | want to use them with a computer too. | anderber wrote: | Same here. I love my Pixel Buds. However, they are setup on | all my devices, I just have to go and pick to connect | depending on which device I want to use it with. Not sure if | there's a way around that, for any Bluetooth device. | yowlingcat wrote: | Adding another voice in the choir of "just use wired | headphones" -- I have never had a pair of wireless Bluetooth | earphones that make sense from a usability standpoint and at | this point I am pretty soured on the whole asset class. My | wired headphones just work and give me none of these issues! | bart_spoon wrote: | > Manually having to re-pair once in every blue moon, one | earbud playing while the other isn't, no automatic device | switching without having to go through the Settings app | everytime, A/V desync, dodgy mic quality, earbuds not waking up | correctly when removing them from the case, etc are all part of | the non-AirPods Bluetooth experience. | | Many of these have been part of my experience with both my | Airpods and Airpod Pros. | tomcam wrote: | My AirPods Max pair horribly with my iPhone 13 mini, much worse | than a pair of $20 Bluetooth earphones that of course sound | much worse. | smoldesu wrote: | Pretty much all multipoint Bluetooth headsets these days "just | work". Hell, the only real upgrade they could make is muxing | multiple audio channels from multiple devices. Beyond that, I | honest to god don't see how Bluetooth headsets could really be | improved. | philistine wrote: | Hopefully all those problems will go away one day. Apple is | rumoured to be working on a new wireless connection to achieve | lossless quality, which would mean a more modern interaction. | The Airpods don't solve any Bluetooth problems, they hide them. | SirFatty wrote: | I have cheapy TOZO from Amazon, and honestly have none of those | issues. At my desk, I toggle between the laptop and phone | without issue... | freeflight wrote: | I've had a pair of Huawei FreeLace Pro for about a year now, | using them with an iPhone, and the only issue out of those you | described, I experienced, was the "re-pair once in every blue | moon", which is an issue that seems to be pretty universal | across bluetooth devices. | | They support multiple devices, but no automatic switching, it's | just a button short-cut to switch between them, works quite | nicely for switching from my iPhone to my iPad and back. | tssva wrote: | I have a cheap pair of SoundPEATS I got off of Amazon for $23. | They don't suffer these issues. They "just work" with my | Android phone and Thinkpad running Windows. | lijogdfljk wrote: | > one earbud playing while the other isn't, | | Funny, i deal with this nearly every day with my AirPods Pro. | Often the pods do this when switching from high bandwidth | listening to low bandwidth for mic/headset usage. | mrtranscendence wrote: | The most annoying thing about my AirPods Pro, which I generally | like very much ... my phone starts playing music from _its_ | speakers when I take the AirPods out of my ears (and was not | previously listening to music). Not all the time, but maybe 15% | of the time, enough to be annoying. I have no idea what 's going | on. I've tried googling it, but nobody else seems to be having | this problem. I've combed through settings but nothing seems | applicable. I think I'm stuck with it. | dnhz wrote: | I don't have AirPods but this sometimes happens to me when I | turn off my Bluetooth headphones. Usually it's Spotify that | begins playing on my computer. I agree that google searching | has been unhelpful. | initplus wrote: | Do you use Spotify? There is a really annoying feature on IOS | Spotify where it hijacks the system volume control, and syncs | it with the Spotify desktop app running on another computer. | Sometimes even when the mobile app is closed! | | And inevitably because I don't use the desktop app volume | adjust just the system volume, it syncs my phone volume to 100% | every time. | mrtranscendence wrote: | Nope, Apple Music. You'd think if any music app worked | properly with the AirPods it would be that. | vernie wrote: | CBB? Yes. Better than the alternatives? Also yes. | jdavis703 wrote: | Some of these problems are because of Bluetooth (see complaints | in this thread about Sony headphones -- a company that many | consider to have a similar product design ethos as Apple). | | Others are due to bad configuration defaults from Apple. Forcing | AirPods to connect to the last device and turning off "pause | music on removal" fixes two of the author's problems. | | This isn't a defense of Apple or AirPods. They obviously don't | "just work." But there are things that can improve the | experience. | ascagnel_ wrote: | > Others are due to bad configuration defaults from Apple. | Forcing AirPods to connect to the last device and turning off | "pause music on removal" fixes two of the author's problems. | | I don't even necessarily think these are problems. I almost | always want whatever I'm playing to stop when I disconnect my | headphones, and there are times I don't want the headphones to | connect to the last device (ie: I've been listening to | something on my laptop, left the laptop behind somewhere, and | want to start listening from my phone). | jdavis703 wrote: | Ok, so the reason I said bad is because this happens to me. | I'm playing music on my laptop. I go to the bathroom. Maybe | an auto-playing video with sound pops up on my iPhone. The | headphones switch to my phone. Now I'm back at my laptop and | have to manually reconnect the headphones. | | Perhaps this is what people want, but in my cases it's two | tech annoyances (auto play video and fumbling with the | Bluetooth menu). | ninkendo wrote: | > Forcing AirPods to connect to the last device | | If only it were that simple. Unfortunately this config option | is not a property of the AirPods themselves, but to each | individual device you own, so you can't just set it once. You | have to go to each device you have on your iCloud account and | set "connect only when last connected to this device". | | But it's even worse than that, because the option is only | available to be changed _when you have the AirPods connected_ , | meaning you have to go to each device you own, connect your | AirPods to them, _then_ go to the menu, find the option for | connection mode, and set it to "when last connected". | | And if you forgot a device, it will happily steal your AirPods | connection "automatically" the next time it boots up or decided | it wants to connect them. And you have to search around and | figure out what the hell your AirPods are even connected to. | | Did I mention Apple will occasionally release an OS update | which changes this setting back to "automatically" again? Now | you get to do this whole dance over again, but slowly, as your | individual iDevices get rolled-out updates. | | (I have 5 devices near my work desk that are potential AirPod | connection thieves, this is a huge annoyance to me if you can't | tell.) | Nextgrid wrote: | In my case I seem to just not be able to disable this option | at all. Rather, disabling it prevents the AirPods from | _switching_ but they 'll still pause the currently-playing | audio every time they get in range of another device. | | Every time I walk home with music playing it will pause | because they're suddenly in range of my Macbook. | rabuse wrote: | Had a problem with my AirPods just the other day trying to show | someone some "cool features" they can use them for. I go to put | them in, and they essentially disappeared from my iPhone's | bluetooth list, and it was not possible to reconnect them until I | restarted my phone. I just said "they're great when they work..." | ho_schi wrote: | 3.5 mm jack | | Nasty. Yes ;) | | I'm sorry but it solves these problems and I think most of us | have more prominent issues. Bluetooth - and even overpriced Apple | products - are usually working well with one connection only. And | the headset profile needs to sacrifice quality for voice input. | This is to large degrees a question about priority of the user. | If you need good or even excellent quality - opt for a good | headset and a jack. | | Yes. Some issues can be solved with higher priorities by Apple. | Or Apple doesn't care because it is good enough. Maybe Apple need | an argument for another bad proprietary protocol to make things | worse. I would be happy if I can switch my mouse from Logitech | (Bluetooth) between two laptops with coupling them entirely | again. | afterburner wrote: | In the winter, with all the various layers over my ears and | possibly tangling with the cord? Cord all over the place while | I'm biking or running? I definitely do not miss cords. | eric_cc wrote: | Ooof you could never convince me again to tether my head to my | phone with a cord. No way! | quacker wrote: | Another option is 2.4 GHz wireless, which is common in gaming | headsets, at least, for low-latency / high-quality audio. The | downside is it requires a dongle. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> Another option is 2.4 GHz wireless_ | | Sorry to break it to you but Bluetooth also operates on the | 2.4GHz ISM band. Those 2.4GHz dongles you're talking about is | basically a custom wireless protocol that doesn't follow | Bluetooth or any other open standard or OSI stack but is most | likely based on some internal protocol of what the three | major chip makers in the 2.4GHz space offer (Texas | Instruments, Silicon Labs, Nordic Semi) . | | I think the world needs less proprietary standards, not more, | where the dongle is paired to the device in factory and if | you loose the dongle then most likely the headphone or | peripheral is instant e-waste. | | So I'll stick with Bluetooth for the time being thank you | very much. | eqvinox wrote: | The reason "2.4 GHz wireless" is an option is the very | proprietary standard right there, or rather the static | pairing coming with it. The absence of Bluetooth connection | negotiation/switching/... removes an entire class of bugs | and annoyances. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> removes an entire class of bugs and annoyances_ | | Bugs and annoyances which not everyone is having. | Stripping out functionality to crush bugs is like | removing your stomach to get rid of a stomach ache. | | There are cases and classes of hardware where Bluetooth | is not ideal and 2.4GHz proprietary standards are used | (low latency audio, gaming mice, concert/conference | audio. etc.) but those devices already exist on said | proprietary standard instead of Bluetooth since they're | usually not meant to be paired with changing | hosts/clients all the time like most bluetooth devices, | so what's your point? Do you want proprietary dongles to | ship with every pair of earphones? | | 2.4GHz proprietary standards are no magic silver bullet | either. Sure, compared to Bluetooth they can have the | advantage of latency and bandwidth depending on how you | implement said custom protocol in firmware, but it's | ultimately the same damn overcrowded ISM band shared with | the billions of devices everyone has everywhere | (Bluetooth phones, smartwatches, headphones, cars, IoT | devices, security systems, and, the 400 pound gorilla in | the room, motha-friggin-Wi-Fi) . So due to pollution on | the 2.4GHz spectrum you'll end up with potentially | similar issues like Bluetooth devices except now you have | a proprietary standard to deal with. | lanstin wrote: | If you need good audio in one home location, then the | dongle is just fine. My best audio, speaking and | listening, is a gamer wireless over the head/around the | ears thing with a microphone that can extend to where my | mouth is that I bought off my son after he switched to | some fancier thing with a YouTuber style mic. It has a | base station that plugs into USB and also charges a | second battery so I can talk and listen continuously. At | work, sounding clear and not having your sound break is | quite useful. Also for online games. If it's just pod | cast listening and yelling at kids to text when they get | there or whatever, maybe it isn't as important as these | other features. | | But also, in general, they say perfection is reached when | there is nothing left to remove. Extra features often | mean something is wrong with the design. Even with | programming languages, it is vastly better for the | default response to requested new features is "no." | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> If you need good audio in one home location, then the | dongle is just fine_ | | Well yes, for things that tend to stay in the same place | no need use Bluetooth at all. Not denying any of that, | but which of those are issue that have to do with | Bluetooth? | | _> But also, in general, they say perfection is reached | when there is nothing left to remove. Extra features | often mean something is wrong with the design."_ | | Perfect is the enemy of good here. Bluetooth wasn't meant | to be the perfect way of connecting devices, that's | impossible, it was developed back in the late 90's for | connecting millions of mobile devices to each other over | a standardized, cheap (in terms of silicon die area) and | most importantly, low power connection (batteries were | small back then), and it does all that pretty decently. | Sort of a jack of all trades master of none. | | If you're looking for perfect solutions then you should | be looking elsewhere and that's why proprietary solutions | exist and there's nothing wrong wioth that. | quacker wrote: | >Sorry to break it to you but Bluetooth also operates on | the 2.4GHz ISM band. | | Right, but "2.4 GHz wireless audio" is what to search to | find information and non-BT products. | | It is interesting to see your comments about Bluetooth. I | appreciate the standard. It's useful. But as a user I like | things that just work, and Bluetooth audio has been subpar | in my experience. | | Sample size of one, but my experience with non-BT wireless | headsets is superior to Bluetooth headsets in pretty much | every way: no pairing issues and no BT profile switching | madness with varying audio quality when I want to use a | mic. I get low latency, high quality (even lossless) audio. | On my particular headset, replacement dongles can be | purchased and you pair it with the headset once (I've not | had to do this myself yet though). | | I would love to only use Bluetooth everywhere, but it is | not without its shortcomings. | Gigachad wrote: | They put the complexity in to the dongle which if done | right, just works. It's why I choose to use the usb dongle | for my mouse/kb even when they support bluetooth. Because | bluetooth works most of the time while the dongle works all | of the time and doesn't have compromises like "It doesn't | work here because the OS bluetooth stack isn't loaded yet" | | Bluetooth almost needs to be lifted from the OS and become | part of the higher firmware so it works everywhere. | [deleted] | [deleted] | tonymet wrote: | Let's stop to admire the excellent UX of the 3.5mm jack * | tactile feedback when connected (it clicks, you hear it & feel | it). * "find my device" : just pull on the wire * quickly | switch between devices * instant pairing | | We just need a marketing guru to sell people on the 3.5mm wired | headphones | orhmeh09 wrote: | We really might need one if chip shortages are gonna be a | problem. | frosted-flakes wrote: | It rotates and has no direction, so you can untwist your | headphone wire without unplugging it, and plugging it in is | foolproof. | Gigachad wrote: | It had some issues where in unplugging and plugging the | cable would cause voltage spikes because the pins would get | dragged across the wrong connectors and not all be | disconnected at once. Which is why you hear that pop when | using loudspeakers and (un)plugging the cable. This | apparently lead to damage of the speaker over time as well. | WheatM wrote: | dangus wrote: | Nice! I love the 3.5mm jack solution. | | All we gotta do is solve the "I got my cable caught on the door | knob as I walked by" issue and 3.5mm will be perfect. | lanstin wrote: | Putting the phone in pocket and wire under shirt helps but | not 100% | dangus wrote: | What happens if I'm wearing a dress? | | Selling me on going back to wired is like telling me to use | an Ethernet jack on my laptop for optimal performance. | jdminhbg wrote: | None of the AirPod annoyances are as bad as having your | headphones yanked violently out of your ears when the 3.5mm | cable catches on a door handle. | JohnBooty wrote: | If you're walking around, yeah, sure - wireless all the way. | | But for desk use, I don't see the appeal of wireless, given | all of the tradeoffs. | Gigachad wrote: | Even for desk use, wired headphones feel like being leashed | to the desk. It's amazing to be in a meeting and then be | able to just mute yourself and walk off to have a drink | while still listening in. | recursive wrote: | For me, most of the AirPod annoyances individually are worse | than cable yanking. Taken together, it's no contest. | michaelmrose wrote: | 1. A detachable cable will pull out easier than pulling your | headphones off. | | 2. Run the cable of appropriate length inside your shirt or | jacket with enough slack to move without restriction but | without a bunch of extra slack. | throwaway946513 wrote: | I carry my backpack or have a jacket on me at almost all | times, and having the headphone cable holes in each has | prevented this from happening anywhere as often as it used | to. Plus the reliability of wired headphones has reigned | supreme that I sold my AirPod Pros a few weeks ago after they | sat for about a month or two between use, while my corded | headsets are used almost daily. | ivank wrote: | If you have an IEM with a sturdy cable wrapped around your | ear, snagging it on a door handle yanks the connector out of | the Lightning to 3.5mm adapter instead. | tambourine_man wrote: | I'm reminded of Alan Kay's quote on the Mac. Similarly, AirPods | might be the first wireless headphones worth criticizing. | floatingatoll wrote: | Too bad they didn't turn in those buzzing AirPods for the buzzing | noise recall. | teekert wrote: | This is very good to know. I have all these issues with basically | all my wireless headsets and was thinking: I should invest in | Apple Airpods to get rid of this mess... Guess I'm not. | atombender wrote: | Annoyance 1: Go into the AirPods settings (which are, | paradoxically, in your phone's Bluetooth settings, and _only_ | when connected) and set "Connect to This iPhone" to "When Last | Connected to This iPhone". This will disable the wonky | automation. | | I've never experienced 2, 2a, or 2b. | | 3: This is a Zoom problem, I believe. I find that Zoom | periodically enables the microphone even though I'm not in a | meeting, and you can see this in the latest macOS by looking for | the orange dot in the upper right corner of the screen. The | workaround is to quit Zoom, or go into Zoom's settings and change | the microphone device to your Mac's. | | 6: You may have hit a hardware problem with early models. | Happened to me, and I also often experienced a screaming feedback | tone when I put the earbuds in my ears. Apple will replace them | for free. | | 4, 5, 7: Definitely. | jeremyjh wrote: | Annoyance 1 almost made me give up on the AirPods until I found | that setting, I'd often have my phone at the very edge of | bluetooth range and so it would keep reconnecting to it while | listening to music from my laptop. I much prefer just | explicitly connecting to the pods from the device I want to | use, though this is more steps than it should be on iOS. | morelish wrote: | I have found HomePod (mini) to be not great. Doesn't work well | with third party services like Spotify or radio providers, so | it's content is limited. There's also a very large lag (5 seconds | ish) for the sound to stream from my phone or Mac to the HomePod. | Pausing or starting sound is delayed by 5 seconds (ish). The lag | is so large you cannot really use the HomePod as a speaker | attached to a Mac, if you watch a video, the sound comes in 5 | seconds delayed. Bit of a pity. Hopefully the next versions will | improve the lag. Even providing physical audio cable input would | be good. As the speaker itself is fairly nice. | lifewallet_dev wrote: | > AirPods are wonderful products. But I just wish these annoying | gripes would go away. | | What's wonderful about all that? Our fanboyism is re-defining the | word "wonderful", Annoyence 4 and 3 made me think AirPods broke | and they happen so frequently, I also have the Sony wh-1000xm4 | and I cannot configure the mic without degrading my audio | quality. I'm back to wired, I have a Beyerdynamic DT 1990 PRO, | and none of these overhyped products match its quality, I can | live with the cables :) | JohnBooty wrote: | I'm back to wired | | Same here. Absolutely don't understand the appeal of wireless | headsets for people who are sitting at a desk. | | I've snapped up a bunch of used Bose QC25s from eBay, their | last model that used a removable standard AAA battery. | | Great sound, solid noise canceling, the wired mic is fine, they | work even if the battery is drained, sound is better than | Bluetooth. I keep a little AAA battery charger on my desk so it | takes 10 seconds to swap out a depleted AAA for a new one; IMO | far less hassle than remembering to charge headphones with non- | replaceable internal batteries. | | I expect the QC25s to last more or less indefinitely, aside | from occasional replacement of the (insanely comfortable) | earpads. | loginatnine wrote: | Yea I went wired at the beginning of the pandemic, QC-35 | wired with a wired antlion mic, works like a charm. 3 main | reasons I went with this setup : 1- Reduce the audio lag | (bluetooth comes with a noticeable lag in video conferencing) | 2- Not having to worry about battery life (going wired vastly | improved the QC-35 battery life) 3- Keep the stellar comfort | (at least for me) of the QC-35. | | I personally don't understand why people endure the sucky | audio quality of bluetooth handset profile. Couple this with | a very ordinary battery life for airpods (I don't care if it | charges in 10 minutes, when it's out and you need it you're | stuck), I don't understand why this product is so popular. | [deleted] | JohnBooty wrote: | Another nice thing about Bose is that they're "somewhat" | repairable. | | They're not really designed to be, but because they sell in | such huge quantities, there's kind of an "ecosystem" of | replacement parts and YouTube repair videos etc. | Replacement of the internal battery on the QC35 doesn't | seem too terribly onerous. The earpads are shared with the | QC25 too, which is nice. | | I'm not nearly as eco-conscious as I should be, but it's | nice to keep things out of the landfill. | ActorNightly wrote: | Yep, back to wired for me as well. | | Run the wire under the shirt. Need to switch from phone to | laptop for a meeting? Unplug/replug. If I need to remove | headphones to talk to someone, i just let them hang down. Never | worry about charging them, loosing them, easily replaceable due | to price (and with good sound quality as well). | 0xedd wrote: | 0xbadcafebee wrote: | I highly recommend Jabra bluetooth earbuds as a replacement for | AirPods. They stay in your ears well, they're comfy, have pretty | decent audio quality, good connectivity, good battery life, ANC, | wireless charging. If you watch their website, they sell | refurbished units for pretty huge discounts. The Elite 65t's may | be old but they're still really good and super cheap now: | https://www.jabra.com/deals#?pfs=discountedprice-desc&pff=2f... | mleo wrote: | With one phone and one pair of headphones, many cheaper truly | wireless Bluetooth devices will be comparable to AirPods and | probably suffer some of the same related annoyances with losing | audio in one of the buds. | | Moving to multiple Apple devices, the AirPods are amazing, but | still suffer the annoyances OP mentioned. I can pair AirPods to | phone and then move them to Mac for zoom, watch for exercise, tv | for listening to content in kitchen not appropriate for younger | kids. Being available across all those devices was automatic. | | That said, the annoyances are real. | | The weirdest situation I have had recently was some how getting | the left AirPod connected to one device and right connected to a | different device with audio and mics simultaneously working. | Luckily, mute worked on both devices and didn't have to speak to | both at the same time. | tomxor wrote: | > when clicking the active AirPods in the bluetooth list, there | is a short 3~ second delay which makes you think they haven't | been disconnected, leading you to click it again. But your first | click did actually fire leading you to be confused as to what | state you are currently in. | | There is a known correct way to do this in UIs: no large delays | for UI state change, even if the underlying function takes a | humanly perceptible duration. | | Apple used to be good at this stuff, it's just attention to | detail in UX... it's not like this is an area of opinion. | victorbstan wrote: | I hope someone at Apple listens to these things. There are a lot | of little things that can be improved in general regarding | Bluetooth devices. Currently, if my MacBook restarts, I can't use | my Bluetooth mouse and keyboard to input my password, I have to | use the built in keyboard. Using Logitech devices. | hbn wrote: | I don't know if it's the same for third party peripherals, but | I know I thought this was the case for a long time with my | first party Apple wireless keyboard + mouse, but it turned out | it just didn't automatically connect on the login screen, and | if I just hit any button on the keyboard it would connect in a | second or 2 (I'm guessing that hitting keys while it's | disconnected sends out a signal to pair) | the_watcher wrote: | Annoyance 4 is the one that really bothers me (although to be | fair, I have Beats Studio Buds that have exactly the same issue). | Also, they get _really_ dirty and are very irritating to clean. | Really not sure how Apple hasn't produced a good cleaning tool | (or at least identified one and listed it in the store). | toastal wrote: | This Bluetooth headphone trend I think is mostly just to sell | more products and bundles. Remove the headphone jack and now | people need to buy the matching headphones they don't _really_ | want but the OEM is offering a $10 discount. Then they all have | their own proprietary "app" for configuration that isn't cross- | platform (have a Linux phone? add this to the pile of "sucks to | be you"). Said apps always include tracking and phone homing and | more permissions than needed because the other part was to sell | your user data as the side hustle to Bluetooth headphones. | | I'm sad I fell for it after buying a newer ASUS laptop without a | headphone jack and picking up a pair for my girlfriend too. The | issues Bluetooth has caused me have wasted company money as I try | to 'fix' my headphones for telecommunication. Active noise | cancelation is nice, but not disrupting-my-work nice. | baxuz wrote: | Bluetooth audio is a mess with no way out. | | I really think that Apple is going to just drop Bluetooth audio | at some point and make their own protocol, with Bluetooth perhaps | being the "green bubble" fallback option. | weedfroglozenge wrote: | Something I've found annoying is if I'm using the airpods with my | iPhone, and I'm chilling on the couch and decide to Chromecast, | if I have already started chrome casting to the TV and then take | my airpods out it will pause the show despite audio already going | through TV? | ryguytilidie wrote: | My favorite part is how on Monday mornings when I have a meeting | I can just 100% count on one of these things happening: | | -One of them will have a dead battery, even though they've been | in a perfectly clean case that charged it yesterday and will | charge it tomorrow. -They will no longer be paired with my phone | for some reason. -They will pair with my phone, but just not | recognize that they should be the primary audio output and calls | will just play on speaker phone. | | But sure, they "just work". | boardwaalk wrote: | Meanwhile I've given them up since the charging contacts have | gotten so bad at reliably touching. Most of the time I'll pick | them up and they're dead or I'll spend several minutes (not | exaggerating) putting them in the case and taking them out to get | them to activate properly. | | No amount of cleaning or other finagling really helps. | | And this has happened to me in the very first AirPods and the | AirPods Pro. | | I'm not sure how this bad design survives but fool me three | times... | notapenny wrote: | I've "enjoyed" most of these including the occasional loud blast | of white noise when trying to connect, and my favourite; they | disconnect immediately when there's no output for a few seconds | and then take a few seconds to re-connect. Mac OSX also doesn't | seem to enjoy that, immediately reconnecting takes a bit and | often fails. They're nice but they suffer from "trying to be | smart" but end up being annoying. | kawfey wrote: | Regarding annoyance 6, Apple replaces crackling airpods for free. | https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-airpods-pro-free-repla... | | I've had my left one replaced twice now, no charge. But since my | left pod is new, and my right is old, the right has a rapidly | decaying battery life, which cannot be replaced free of charge. | SigmundA wrote: | I turn off auto switching, it causes too many issues. Otherwise | for me they have worked better than any other wireless headphone | / earbuds. | | They need double the battery life and they would be basically | perfect for my use, I am hopeful ver 3's will do this along with | maybe some crazy move away from bluetooth which I still believe | is the root of all the issues that even Apple can't fully solve | without just making some different wireless protocol. | toolcombinator wrote: | This is part of Apple's problem right now. | | They've lost focus. | | TV shows, cars, VR headsets, six different iPad models. | | So the small stuff suffers: iOS. OS X. AirPods. Airdrop. | | Airdrop just stopped working for me recently. The clock app in | iOS still only lets you have ONE reminder. | apricot13 wrote: | My airpod pros work better than my airpod pro max's but both | buggy. | | - if your listening to your airpods and answer a phone call on | your apple watch the speaker it chooses is not the airpods its | your watch! so I'm thinking wow they're speaking really quiet | only to realise its coming from my watch! | | - switching audio devices while on a call takes far too long | | - when I switch my audio output on my iphone sometimes the whole | phone hangs. Seems to be fixed now but it was a problem for such | a long time that I'm too scared to change audio devices on my | phone | | - when I connect to my mac sometimes they just wont reconnect and | I have to reboot | | - when I connect to my mac, then my phone or I disconnect them | for a while when they come back the audio jumps up to max. I'm | scared to use them with my mac because of this! | martini333 wrote: | Annoyance: When I use AirPods Pro and turn on my car, my iPhone | automatically switches to the car-stereo's Bluetooth as expected. | If I take the AirPods out of my ears for the first 5-10 secs | after the switch, the iPhone pauses whatever was playing. I need | to wait, or resume manually. | bvogelzang wrote: | I just got Airpods for Christmas and I love them. Most of these | annoyances revolve around the fact that you're using two devices | at the same time. I do the same on a regular basis and run into | some of these all the time. One that is not on this list: | | Sometimes when I switch from my Mac to my iPhone, Spatialized | Stereo does not kick in until I toggle the setting on my iPhone | from off to on. | leokennis wrote: | I would be a happy man if I could tell my AirPods: | | "You only need to be paired to my iPhone. I don't need you synced | to all my devices via iCloud and you never need to accept audio | from and switch to anything but my iPhone. That'll do earbuds. | That'll do." | fungiblecog wrote: | i don't find that any of my apple products "just work". they all | have annoying "features" that sound great as a sales pitch but | are crap in real life use | gnicholas wrote: | I also find the automatic device switching to be super annoying. | In my experience it is both under inclusive and over inclusive. I | have no idea how this passed muster for release at a company like | Apple. | | There is a way to turn off this feature in settings, BTW. | jcpst wrote: | Sounds like a lot to deal with, for the price. I've never had to | replace the pair of wired earbuds that come with an iPhone. | nneonneo wrote: | I've had to replace...a lot of wired earbuds. I have an entire | shelf full of dead wired earbuds, from all sorts of | manufacturers (Apple, RIM, cheapo $5 earbuds, Sony, Shure, | ...), which almost uniformly failed in the same weird way: the | right earbud becomes intermittently staticky after a few | months. I checked with multiple devices (phones, computers), so | it's probably not the socket, but more likely something to do | with the way I tug on the cord when I run or walk? | | Anyway, after burning through a lot of wired headphones, I've | had the current AirPods Pro for over a year with no trouble, | and the sound quality is the same to me (plus, noise | cancellation is useful). | the-alt-one wrote: | Good to hear the gripes with AirPods are identical to my $80 | earpods, nothing missed out on in other words :-). | | Edit: I have a pair of JBL LIVE300TWS. They're good! | Grumbledour wrote: | It feels really good to hear that the expensive models have | mostly the same flaws as the cheap ones. So the people who tell | me it must be my 40EUR anker models, because theirs always work | fine probably just don't use them as much, but at the same | time, spending more money would not have given me better | functionality (except noise canceling). | | I guess the real thing to take away is, that cable is still the | most reliable option (and also saves a lot on battery!) | justinator wrote: | Or my $30 ones... | jhkiehna wrote: | I had the same thought. These issues might just be issues with | bluetooth in general, and not much apple can do about it. | tluyben2 wrote: | I decided on the same pair of headphones vs AirPods: do not | think it was a mistake. | Pxtl wrote: | Honestly, the whole Bluetooth pairing process is an industry-wide | failure. I'd throw out all the pairing logic industry-wide and | say "Connecting to Bluetooth peripherals requires NFC. NFC-tap a | Bluetooth device to its host to connect". | DavideNL wrote: | Annoyance 8: Apple Music desperately tries to make you use it by | automatically opening the Music app (even though you use Spotify | 99% of the time) | diebeforei485 wrote: | Annoyances 1 and 7 can be solved by changing the settings for | automatic switching. The instructions for that are at the bottom | of https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212204, under "Turn off | Automatic Switching". | rogual wrote: | Annoyance 8: When I'm using the (good) noise cancelling of the | AirPods to eliminate distracting background noise so I can focus, | after a few hours the battery will run down to 15% and trigger | the EXTREMELY LOUD "PING-pong-pong-pong" low-battery noise, right | in my ear, without warning. | | And it's Apple, so of course you can't turn it off. | timtimmy wrote: | Apple engineers reading this: The painfully loud "PING" sounds | on the AirPods Max hurt my ears when I switch from transparency | to sound isolation mode. It's really unpleasant and I'm | concerned this is damaging my hearing. The "ping" volume level | should be customizable or at least quieter across the AirPods | line. | Traubenfuchs wrote: | What's the big deal here, Apple? | | People have been complaining about BEING CAUSED PAIN BY AIRPODS | for YEARS and they are not doing anything about it! | | This being the top rated comment here further proves it's a | major issue for airpod users. What the fuck, apple? | | I am absolutely terrified of that painful sound and will | regularly check battery to ensure it won't hit me. | kristjansson wrote: | Just to provide my own ancedata, I've been an AirPods users | for a long time, and don't find the alert sounds particularly | loud or annoying. | | I think the volume of complaints and popularity of AirPods | this speaks to wider variations in human hearing perception | than one would expect. The main body of users have no | problem, but enough people experience those sounds as painful | to generate a volume complaints. | smoldesu wrote: | Conversely, it might just speak to the different kinds of | music we listen to. "Dynamic range" is a pretty big phrase | you'll hear in the mixing industry, and Airpods effectively | have no way to determine how loud your music is before | sending an audible notification. If you're listening to a | song that's mixed at -12dbLUFS on Spotify or Apple Music, | the alert will play at the exact same volume as it would | when you're watching a Netflix show mixed at -25dbLUFS. The | difference in sound is, quite literally, an order of | magnitude apart, and could quite easily account for having | such a loud and annoying sound blowing up your ears and | ruining your listening experience. | toxik wrote: | Every. Body. I. Know. that has a pair of AirPods commiserate. | | I can only assume they know but can't fix it. | | In fact, why isn't there "adjust volume to surroundings" like | there is for brightness? They should KNOW how loud is | appropriate based on mic input. | | Maybe it's for people who drop their earbuds? So it can be | heard from a distance? That would certainly explain it... | | A hack would be to put some foam or so inside to dampen the | sound and then max out the volume. Then they physically | cannot make loud sounds. | Beltalowda wrote: | Clearly the problem is just with how your ears are | constructed, or how you are using your ears. Apple only | makes perfect products, after all. | onphonenow wrote: | Same when switching noise canceling - why so loud? | lajosbacs wrote: | Your comment made me realise that I actually never switch | with the pods button (rather on the display of my phone) | because of the loud noise. I don't get why they have not | fixed this after years of complains from users. | gabeio wrote: | Doesn't it still make the noise when you use the onscreen | switch? | | Either way it's horrible, all of these noises seem to be | at a fixed or separate volume level than the media volume | (which actually is common for apple). Siri used to have a | separate volume than media (still might?), and then you | also have ringtone volume, and sound in settings barely | even hints that all these separate volumes exist. | guelo wrote: | Annoyance 9: Misplacing or losing these tiny $200 devices is a | lot more painful than when I used to lose $20 wired headphones. | | Maybe I'm more prone to losing things than the average person. | But after losing two of these things over the last couple years | I'm not buying them again. | tahnhnxfl wrote: | I don't use my AirPods Max below 25% charge anymore because I'm | scared of being startled by the ridiculously loud noise. I | can't believe this passed Apple's QA. | hetspookjee wrote: | You'd be no better off with a Sony Headphone that screams in | your ear that a device connected, the device is turned on and | the battery is almost empty. The flagship Sony headphone is so | bug ridden it's a joke if you ask me. | darrenf wrote: | What bugs are you referring to? | | > _You 'd be no better off with a Sony Headphone that screams | in your ear that a device connected, the device is turned on | and the battery is almost empty._ | | I have the WF-1000XM4s. On the iOS headphones app, visiting | System and turning off "Notification & Voice Guide" gets rid | of the power on and battery level announcements leaving only | the connection/disconnection alerts (although I keep all of | them on as I find them useful, and wouldn't characterise them | as screams). | minhazm wrote: | I have the same headphones and the main issue I have with | it is their multi-device support is pretty much broken for | me. If I'm on a zoom call and I get a phone call on my | other device it takes over the audio (as expected), but | then if I decline the phone call the audio doesn't switch | back to my zoom call (computer). I end up having to turn | the headphones off and back on for them to reconnect, which | actually takes a good 10-15 seconds at least. The Bose QC35 | I had before handled multiple devices way better, | unfortunately they just didn't sound as good as the Sony. | lanstin wrote: | I hate to say this but I mostly turn Bluetooth on and off | as I use different devices. If I get a iPhone call during | meeting that I can not listen to for a minute, then I | will check mute, stop video, and then answer the phone on | speaker. I try to have Bluetooth off when I am outside | anyways for security and privacy reasons, so it is | complementary to that. | hetspookjee wrote: | I too have the WF-1000XM4 and I only have the function to | turn off the notification & voice guide that will stop | making the sound that tells me what mode it is in. But it | will happily scream in my ear that its either connected, | almost empty or on / off. Regarding the bugs I experience | on a regular basis: - Every off week the Speak-to-chat is | somehow activated and than it drops me out of the music | with the sound amplified. - The standby function does no | longer work since a month or two and I find it empty every | time I forget to either manually turn it off or put it in | the charger - The multi device is so odd that I need to | disconnect all devices in the surrounding and start | connecting one by one - The dual bluetooth sometimes | struggle to work with both Windows and Mac. - The | connection with Windows was something I actually needed to | Google as I couldnt get the quality to work, I somehow had | to read somewhere that I needed to wait for +-1min till the | actual device pops up in the list (Its registered as two | seperate devices) but for this I actually blame Windows - | Teams often refuses to play with the main device, but | rather prefers the crappy audio system one. | | To finish off and it's not a bug, but the microphone they | advertise is so laughably bad that roughly 80% of the | people couldnt hear me properly on the other end of the | line. But reading the reviews I find myself one of the few | in this situation. | EamonnMR wrote: | I have a pair of (I wanna say Honeywell? Maybe 3m?) hearing | protection bluetooth headphones that I simply keep off my | head while pairing and unpairing because it's loud enough | that I can hear it clearly with the phones down in my hand. | zwirbl wrote: | I can't comment on the bugs (I'm actually not sure that I've | experienced any), but those connected etc. Messages really | are very annoying, partly because they feel like forever | Beltalowda wrote: | I'm reasonably sure you can actually turn those messages off | though. I did that for a while, but ended up turning them | back on again as connecting them can be ... difficult ... and | I'm never quite sure if they're connected until they tell me | they are (and if I don't play any audio fast enough, they | will also helpfully disconnect). | [deleted] | voisin wrote: | There should be an option to have this information shown as | an alert on the device. iPhones already show the battery | charge level of the headphones so why not make it an alert | banner? | Macha wrote: | You can use the android app to disable the device | connected/disconnected dialogue. | macNchz wrote: | Reminds me of my roommate's Jambox bluetooth speaker years | ago...I learned that it had this behavior while fully asleep at | 4:30am after we'd had a party, when, every few minutes it | started loudly blasting "BOOOOP. LOW BATTERY" alerts. | | The trouble was that it was hidden somewhere in our messy | living room, and the alerts weren't frequent enough to find it | quickly, so I was standing around in my underwear for ages, | waiting for each subsequent alert and getting a bit closer each | time, because it was too loud to go back to sleep. | germinalphrase wrote: | I once had an EE friend that built these tiny chips he called | Annoyers. They simply emitted a loud chirp at a random time | interval. The interval was too long to effectively locate the | chip, and the chirp was terribly annoying. It could take | weeks to find the quarter-sides device hidden in someone's | home (or the battery would just die). | | Of course, while he was explaining this to me, the chip | slipped from my fingers and fell down an air vent of another | friend's living room. The comedic timing was perfect, and it | really might have been the funniest thing to happen to me in | 2012. | slig wrote: | There's a commercial product called "Annoy-a-tron" that | does that. | san-fran wrote: | When I started a new job at a NOC, I was pranked with one | of those. I didn't know what to make of the odd recurring | ~12khz beeps, and figured it was some old device slowly | dying. So I pulled out a stopwatch to see if I could suss | out the interval on the beeping. I was too focused on | timing the beeps to notice my coworkers exchanging | glances with each other after asking them, "Does anyone | else hear that?" | | I found a pattern emerge. It repeated itself every 10 | beeps or so, with irregular intervals between those | beeps. Armed with that information, I could effectively | predict the next beep within 3-5 seconds (intervals | ranged between 3-10 minutes, if I recall.) So I started | walking around the room, standing in different locations | as I stared at my stopwatch. The farther apart the places | I stood, the better chance I'd have of triangulating the | source with each beep. | | I got within 3-5 feet of it in the ~300 square foot room | before the coworkers came clean about what they had done. | I wasn't even mad, I was having a blast! | emilecantin wrote: | Sounds like the small slice of hell that is a low battery in | most smoke detectors: one short (and loud AF) beep every ~15 | minutes. Fine when you have only one, but in a large house | you never know which one of these f*ckers is actually the one | complaining. | Gigachad wrote: | The first time I had this happen I didn't know what the | sound was and it took me weeks to work out because it's so | hard to locate where it comes from. | muttled wrote: | With Amazon Basics 9V batteries sitting at about $1.50 a | piece, I've started the practice of just replacing all the | smoke detector batteries when one of them starts getting | low. When I get to the end of that supply, I'm going to | switch to rechargeables and just recharge them all before | they start chirping. One night of bad sleep from the option | of laying awake, anticipating the next chirp, or going | around the house changing batteries in the middle of the | night isn't worth it. | arnvald wrote: | I had JBL earphones and they had exactly the same problem. Also | couldn't turn it off. Extremely annoying. | kristjansson wrote: | Your (and other's) complaints about the volume of the AirPod | alert notifications makes me think either (a) your hearing is | more sensitive than most or (b) I've lost more hearing than I | thought I had. Either way, those alerts play at what seems like | a reasonable and moderate volume to me. | matwood wrote: | Those alerts are pretty loud, particularly with noise | canceling on. One of the things I love about noise canceling | is I can listen to my music almost at zero volume on the | phone. With everything else blocked out, it's plenty loud. | Then the 'bloop bloop' happens and it's like someone hit me | over the head. | jackson1442 wrote: | I know a lot of people use airpods as like ambient sound, | just keeping them playing super quiet all the time. I | personally keep them at a moderate volume because I have no | interest in hearing anything other than my music, but maybe | the low battery sound is volume-independent, so people who | listen at 10% would be jarred by it. | lowercased wrote: | AirPod Pro 4, coming in 2025, will like have a feature to let | you choose custom alert sounds, tied to ios 19. And it will be | heralded with enormous classy custom Helvetiral fonts in a | multi parallax scrolling site announcing "we've heard the | future, and it's quiet". Or... "If you listen carefully, you | can hear the future". | | Or they'll provide haptic in-ear custom vibrations in AirPod | Pros 5, and their slogan will be "Your ears never felt better". | ASalazarMX wrote: | Better yet, AirPods Pro 4 will allow you to adjust the volume | of the warning tone, AirPods Pro 5 will allow you to | customize it. AirPods Pro 6 will undo that but allow you to | disable the tone and use haptic feedback. Then AirPods Pro 7 | will allow you to adjust the volume of the warning tone, and | customize it. | squeaky-clean wrote: | The one you called AirPods Pro 7 will actually be AirPods | Pro 6s+ | ConceptJunkie wrote: | But they'll come in a new color. | throwaway946513 wrote: | Space Grey | stillblue wrote: | I read way too much of this comment before I realised you | were joking. Got me good. | lowercased wrote: | I'm not actually 100% sure I'm 'joking'. I think we'll see | some in-ear haptic feedback stuff in a few years, which | take a few more years to get 'right', and will be confusing | as heck, but will be useful. If it's customizable, there | will be a small but fervent ASMR community around it. It | will be pitched as accessibility-friendly, helping people | with hearing issues or other sensory issues just 'feel' | indicators. Wire it up to 'apple home' and you'll get | little in-ear tinglings when certain people come home or | leave, or when the garage door opens, and so on. Happy/sad | emojis in iMessage will trigger certain ear vibrations, | etc. | germinalphrase wrote: | Having played around with very convincing binaural | recording, I am all for subtle auditory haptics as an | additional communication layer. I'd be surprised if it's | strictly coded rather than localized to specific | objects/interactions within your specific environment. | jmacd wrote: | SO LOUD | lajosbacs wrote: | Agree completely. My ears actually hurt when this happens, | cannot be healthy. | | The 'device connected' sound is pretty loud as well. | timtimmy wrote: | I can feel my ears tense when those "pings" go off (on the | AirPods Pro and AirPods Max). This can't be healthy. | idontwantthis wrote: | This is the ridiculous experience with all blue tooth | headphones. "BATTERY LOW CHARGE NOW!", or "DING DING DING". | Your battery is effectively 10% or 15% because they become | impossible to listen to once they get low. | break_the_bank wrote: | If there are other runners here, with enough ear sweat the | AirPods starts beeping, the noise makes you want to pull the | AirPods away immediately. After some cool down they start working | again, though my right AirPod now starts "hissing" sooner than it | beeps. This is when I run at 100+ Fahrenheit. Still a great | product though. | becurious wrote: | My original AirPods started to not charge reliably. It was | corrosion from the sweat from running. I now have a pair of | AirPods Pro which are supposed to be sweat resistant but I'm | skeptical. If I do a long run in the summer there's a lot of | sweat. | kayodelycaon wrote: | Apple stuff "just works" until it doesn't. As much as a fan I am | of Apple, the lack of feedback when things stop working is | absolutely infuriating. | moooo99 wrote: | This has been my observation as well. They mostly just work, | but when they don't they are indefinitely more annoying to fix | than ,,regular" BT headphones. | whywhywhywhy wrote: | Had Music.app completely hose my entire data plan last month | because it was downloading about 12 albums I had in "Downloaded | Music" then deleting them then downloading them over and over | last month. | | Not to mention Apple Music keeps turning itself back on when I | turn it off. | | All impossible to diagnose why and the only advice is reset and | delete everything and start over. | tluyben2 wrote: | I was wondering why my phone battery kept running down some | days faster than others. Seems it randomly turns on Apple | Music even when the volume is down to 0% and I don't really | notice that until I see it is actually playing on the | notifications centre. I never, ever want it to play without | me touching the play button on my phone, but that is not an | option I guess. | mensetmanusman wrote: | Aha, just experienced this yesterday when I couldn't update or | download any new app on my child's iPad with the newest OS | because it refused to ever finish accepting my iCloud password. | | Through some obscure digging, I found that changing my region | language on the ipad from English > UK English and back somehow | fixed it... | MereInterest wrote: | And sometimes it "just works", but only if everybody is within | the Apple ecosystem. Otherwise, it's just a net exporter of | problems. See, for example, SMS message of "Liked an image.", | email attachments converted into icloud download links, | .DS_STORE files scattered everywhere, and so on. Any time Apple | comes up with a new feature that would require improving | capabilities at a lower level, Apple instead makes a new layer | of abstraction on top. And oh how conveniently, that new layer | of abstraction is transparent only to Apple users. | wccrawford wrote: | I overheard someone the other day ranting about Android | phones and their broken SMS support. They apparently didn't | realize it's actually Apple that has the buggy code/design | and will try to send proprietary data to a non-Apple device. | Jcowell wrote: | Can you elaborate more on this | MereInterest wrote: | See my comment here[0]. Apple added application-level | support for non-standard features not supported by SMS. | When Apple sends message through the Message application, | it selects either iMessage or SMS, based on whether there | exists an iMessage connection, and whether the recipient | has an iMessage account. This includes for things that | are not representable by SMS. Reactions in the Message | application, sent to a non-Apple device, show up as | nonsense replies, such as "Liked an image", or "Liked | 'The full text of the thing you just sent them.'". | | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30085322 | evrydayhustling wrote: | > Apple stuff "just works" until it doesn't. | | "Just works" is absolutely a statement that should be | considered on a time curve! Some products work incredibly in | the most trivial use case you test during unboxing, but fall | apart when deeply integrated. Others are a PITA to set up, but | stop requiring any unproductive attention afterwards. | | This was incredibly clear for anyone WITHOUT AirPods during | 2019-2020. Everyone picked them up with their iPhone 11 upgrade | and immediately started talking about how they "just work". | Three months later, you'd see people fiddling with extra | devices to keep them charged, or complaining about sending them | through the laundry or into subway grates. Then the pandemic | hit and they became an entire category of Zoom fatigue due to | multiple bluetooth connections. | Gigachad wrote: | I think a lot of this is down to the fact that all issues that | the user could resolve have already been fixed and when you | eventually hit an issue, its some low level problem you have no | hope of fixing anyway. While on windows or linux you often run | in to situations where its just "Oh don't press that button, | thats the button that makes it blow up, press the one next to | it" while apple removes the button that makes it blow up. | | That isn't always the case, but it tends to be. | gullywhumper wrote: | My annoyance is that gen3 audio controls are significantly more | difficult to use. With gen2 it was possible to simply tap the | side of the airpod to pause, skip, or go back, and the user had | the option to set which side controlled that functionality. | | Gen3 has a sensor that has the same functionality, but it is more | cumbersome to use. The sensor is small and angled in a position | that makes it more awkward and difficult to access. It requires | some precision and dexterity - a pinch rather than a tap. The | sensor is on the stem of the airpod, so it feels less secure to | press. There is also a small click when the sensor is pressed | that gets annoying. | | I live in a cold environment and frequently have to wear multiple | layers of gloves, mittens, hoods, and hats when I go for long | walks, so I lose that functionality. | AtNightWeCode wrote: | It is a fashion and convenience tool. Poor sound quality. Comes | with the general Bluetooth problems. | | The funniest problem I had was on the subway and some bored kid | next to me opened and closed the lid back and forth. For some | reason this spammed my phone with connectivity messages to the | point that I could not use my phone. | duderific wrote: | I think the sound quality is remarkably good given the size and | form factor. It's not comparable to over the ear headphones of | course, but that is a different use case. | mucholove wrote: | The worst thing about AirPods--specifically the AirPods Pro is | that they provoke tinnitus. | | I can't use them. And so it goes... | gnicholas wrote: | Automatic device switching is hell. These two anecdotes happened | since I read this article 10 minutes ago: | | I was listening to a podcast using AirPods and my iPhone. Someone | _reacted_ to a message I'd sent, which paused the podcast. When I | tried to resume a second later, my AirPods had magically | connected to my computer instead of my phone. WTF! | | Still listening to the podcast and setting up a FaceTime call for | my kid on an iPad. Before starting the call, I turned off | Bluetooth, so my iPad wouldn't connect to my AirPods. Regardless, | it connected to them anyway. | | Did no one at Apple test this 'feature'? | barkerja wrote: | If device switching is more of an annoyance/issue than it is a | pleasing feature, you can configure it. And it's configurable | per-device. | | When AirPods are connected, go into the bluetooth preferences, | select "Options" next to the connected AirPods. Change the | value for "Connect to This Mac" | Spivak wrote: | This is a bad end-user experience but I can kinda see the flow. | | You're listening on your iPhone but _using_ your computer. | Device switching then says "okay since they're using their | computer if any sound comes from the computer they should hear | it" and then iMessage made a sound. | | Had the thing you did been playing a YouTube video or Spotify | then it would be weird if your AirPods didn't switch. I think | it makes sense for notification sounds to not trigger switching | by default but IDK what they currently do isn't totally | unreasonable. | gnicholas wrote: | This would make sense if I had been using my computer. But I | was in the kitchen and hadn't played any media on my computer | all day. | | Also, the distance from the devices should have been a | giveaway: 3 feet from the phone and 25 feet from the | computer. | biot wrote: | It's even worse when you're on an active phone call (the | standard iPhone phone functionality, not third party | meeting/voip app) talking to another human being and an alert | sound plays on the computer, stealing the audio from your | phone call and you can no longer hear or speak with the other | person. I can't think of a better example where "don't steal | the audio" is more applicable. | gnicholas wrote: | Another similar annoyance: I'm on my phone using my AirPods | and I wander in range (but still rooms away from) my Beats, | which happen to be turned on. Even though I haven't taken | my AirPods out of my ears, my phone switches over to my | Beats. Why? | | Surely the AirPods know they're still inserted and should | be able to override any external switching cue. Also, the | AirPods are still much closer to my phone than the Beats, | so the signal should be stronger. Lastly, it's not like I | just turned on the Beats, and they sent some sort of | startup/activation signal. I literally just get home from a | walk and my phone migrates to a different audio output. | Maddening. | vanviegen wrote: | I strongly disagree. These kinds of annoyances are not | acceptable, as the no-nonsense alternative (switching | manually) is just great in comparison. | rootusrootus wrote: | I do get some of the quirks, but not nearly that full list. If | I'm on a call or listening to music through my AirPods when | connected to my Mac, and then open my phone, they _do_ connect to | the phone, but it does not switch the audio away from the | computer unless I tell it to on the phone. | | I also have a pair of fancy Sony noise canceling wireless | headphones, and they're much more finicky about connecting and | staying connected than my Airpods are. Fundamentally the problem | seems to be that bluetooth kinda sucks. | throwaway22032 wrote: | I barely ever use my headphones with my laptop, but my Sony | headphones on an Android phone work 100% perfectly all of the | time. | | I've never had a hiccup. | | Okay, I mean, if I'm in an area with thousands of others using | headphones, I might get some interference. That's it. Otherwise, | totally fine. | paines wrote: | >....if I'm in an area with thousands of others using | headphones, I might get >some interference. That's it. | Otherwise, totally fine. | | Which imho is completely unacceptable because it annoys the | hell out of me. I was using AirPods with an Xiaomi 8 Pro phone | half a year ago. And this happended constanly and most of the | time at street crossings in urban areas where 2-3-4 people | would cross your way. Since I switched to an iPhone this never | happened again. | | PS: Why was I using AirPods with a cheapish android mobile | phone? I tried lots of air pods like products from various | vendors and each and any of them worked nicely for a couple of | days until I would charge them overnight which killed the | charging box where the headphones resided in or the headphones | themself. Or like other useres in this thread described: one | headphone would pair the other suddenly not anymore... | greggman3 wrote: | Well, since we're ranting about Airpods | | My Gen 2 Airpods work great. I tried Airpod Pro's and Airpod Gen | 3. Both have the crappy "pinch" controls instead of the awesome | "tap" controls. Pinching requires more fingers free so for | example walking home from the grocery store with heavy bags in | both hands and trying to control my Airpods (next song, pause), | is much easier with tap (single finger, knuckle, palm) than with | pinch (2 free fingers). Also while cooking, can tap with knuckle | if hands are dirty but can't pinch with dirty fingers. | | Otherwise, they've worked for me 98% of the time. A few times | they've failed to connect to one device or another and the only | solution was to re-pair them (only ever used them on Apple | devices). The other is they suck in crowded places like busy | trains and stations in Japan, they'll cut out OFTEN! (Shibuya, | Shinjuku, rush hour). | | My current ones cut out in my living room. No idea why but it's | really annoying, I'm 1-2 meters from my M1X Mac and they're | cutting out quite often. | | But overall I like them alot. | soheil wrote: | I never found AirPods convenient, there are just so many moving | parts. There are just so many pieces you need to be mentally | aware of, the left/right pods, the case and the charging cable. | You need to then think about how this is going to connect to your | device, you can't just physically plug them in and be assured | they will just work. They run out of battery. The case will | separately run out of battery. The BT quality isn't great and | degrades depending on the conditions. You can't use one motion | with your hands to take them out of their case and plug them in | your ears like you can with wired headphones. You are more prone | to losing the case or one of the disparate ear pieces since there | are three different pieces. There is a bulge in your pocket if | you keep them there, which is kind of even more visible and | annoying if you wear something other than jeans. | | I'm not saying there is a better solution it's just that this | product is a massive failure in my eyes. | brezelnbitte wrote: | Airpod Pros are great for running but that's it. I'm genuinely | surprised to see them used in meetings given battery life and | well with my ears they would fall out immediately. I can't chew | or talk without them wiggling out. I tried beats fit pro and were | worse. | arthurmorgan wrote: | I regret getting my AirPods Pro. I have them for two years now | and went through 2 cases and 4 earbuds. The quality just does not | match the expectation and price tag. My Sony headphones work like | on the first day after 3 years, however they don't share the same | form factor. :) I wonder how the WF-1000XM4 perform especially in | combination with iOS. | NoblePublius wrote: | I have a $20 pair of Sony wireless headphones that charge via USB | C that have equivalent audio quality to my $199 AirPods pro. | somehnguy wrote: | I absolutely love my AirPods, so much so that when my original | AirPods battery started dying early during meetings I bought a | new set of AirPod Pro without even thinking. | | That said, I experience all of these issues too. Another one to | add to the list that I really don't understand. If I'm listening | to a podcast on my phone and remove an airpod for a moment (to | speak to someone or whatever) the podcast pauses as expected. But | then putting it back in my ear there seems to be only about a 25% | chance the podcast starts playing again. Most of the time I have | to open the Spotify app back up and manually resume. | muttled wrote: | I've noticed when it doesn't resume, often the music player | also isn't on the lock screen. I'm wondering if it's getting | kicked out of memory if it happens to be in a non-active paused | state when the device decides it needs to free some memory up? | somehnguy wrote: | If I had to place a bet - my money would be on your theory. | I've noticed the exact same thing, which makes it even worse | as I then have to pull up the app drawer and go back to my | player app. At least it never gets totally kicked out in that | the state is preserved/not reloading like a fresh open. | | I guess my question from there would be why does the device | suddenly feel the need to release resources when the | music/podcast pauses? I'm experiencing it on an iPhone 13 Pro | which should have no shortage. | | If it was a once in a blue moon thing I would brush it off as | just unlucky timing, but it happens very regularly. | stephc_int13 wrote: | I've only had bad experiences with Bluetooth devices so far, | especially audio. | | Speakers, headphones, keyboards or mice. | | Drivers issues, spurious disconnect, hard reboot needed for no | apparent reason, delays when connecting, sometimes even noise on | the line, difficult to believe given that this is a purely | digital channel AFAIK. | | Lately I am relying on good old analog electronics for audio, and | wires for keyboards/mice. | | Not only those are more reliable and serviceable (I especially | like dumb headphones in that regard) but without batteries, | software update or even drivers, they'll probably last much | longer. | uzbit wrote: | I think most of these annoyances can be taken broadly from the | fact that everything about any Bluetooth experience is just | absolute trash. | | Why does it take several tries to pair sometimes? When paired, | why does it sometimes auto-connect and sometimes not? Why does it | just never pair at all? What's with that pair code that it says | to enter, but auto fills (sometimes)? And only sometimes do you | have to use that code (which is a security thing only implemented | on things with screens I'm guessing). I'm sure there's more, but | I've already dedicated my days frustration to this. | | All that being said, I was very happy to "upgrade" to a Pixel 5a | for the 3.5mm headphone jack. It's been a supreme experience to | live in the past and future. | hbn wrote: | Wasn't that the entire selling point with Apple's W1 chip? That | it's bypassing standard bluetooth handshake protocol and | handling the pairing themselves? | | Airpods seem to be more reliable for that than most bluetooth | experiences I've had, but it's still not as good as I'd hoped | given it's supposed to "just work" | jasonlotito wrote: | > I think most of these annoyances can be taken broadly from | the fact that everything about any Bluetooth experience is just | absolute trash. | | That's not my problem. That's Apple's problem. There are | solutions around this, and they made a choice to use the | technology they did. End result is their product. These | annoyances aren't because they have wireless headphones. It's | because of the choices they made. | davidmurdoch wrote: | How have consumers let companies get away with "premium" phones | being the ones with fewer features? | Gigachad wrote: | Because I don't miss anything about old phones. Yes sometimes | the airpods can work a little funny, but on a whole, they are | so far ahead of the wired headphones I used to use that I can | completely forgive the issues they have. Yeah it was cool to | put an SD card in my phone, but it never worked that seamless | and my phone now has more storage than I'll ever use. | criddell wrote: | Maybe they don't mind putting the adapter on their headphone | cable? If you aren't switching devices a lot, it's a one-time | operation that's pretty easy to manage. | lanstin wrote: | Because it is, statistically, an easier and more pleasant | experience. I really get tired of taking twenty minutes to | configure a bunch of settings for each marginally novel piece | of tech I acquire. | 0xedd wrote: | GraemeMeyer wrote: | I think of it like USB A ports. You miss it for a few years. | And then you don't. And the products generally continue to | improve along other lines | orhmeh09 wrote: | I've never had the bit snap off a USB A cable when it was | plugged in yet it's happened to me twice with USB C. I've | also had to replace ports due to the wear on the cable | futon not being able to stay in place. Furthermore, I'm | less certain if a cable I have lying around is going to be | fully compatible. I also have to keep USB A around so | there's this big growth in the number of cables and | adapters that are necessary. | | In almost every way that is meaningful to me USB C has been | a downgrade. I can't think of anything that improved my | experience beyond saving a minute when I plug the laptop | into only the monitor and not the power cable too. | bradgessler wrote: | Apple could get away with introducing their own wireless audio | I/O standard the eliminated the need for Bluetooth for sound. | This new wireless protocol would ideally: | | 1. Allow AirPods to be connected to multiple audio devices at the | same time and eliminate the need to have to switch between | exclusive audio sources. | | 2. Eliminate the problem where a Zoom call (or any call) | downgrades audio quality. | | 3. Allow the playback of lossless audio wirelessly. | | I know there's a crowd that will absolutely hate this idea | because it's yet another step away from a standard (Bluetooth), | but the protocol has so much baggage that it's not delivering a | great experience for people in the Apple ecosystem. | deergomoo wrote: | Expect this soon. There was an interview with an Apple manager | in What HiFi recently and some of the stuff he was saying | strongly suggested that they're considering doing their own | thing. | jugg1es wrote: | I highly recommend the brand Jabra if you are an Android user. | Basically all other bluetooth buds have horrible UX in my | experience besides Jabra and AirPods. | CTmystery wrote: | I'm only an indirect user of AirPods and I really do not like | them: Every time my team does a google meet / hangout the folks | using AirPods sound terrible to the point that it's distracting. | I don't know if it's in the microphone, the bluetooth connection, | or the interaction with a google product, but it is much worse | than (a) wired earbuds and (b) the folks using Bose QC 35s (which | the company gave out a while back) | frosted-flakes wrote: | Wired headphones have the mic on the wire beside your mouth. | Wireless headphones have them around the corner on the side of | your head, which is an objectively terrible location for a | microphone. | willchis wrote: | I was about to post this. People with AirPods really should | know this - you sound like you're talking on a 1980s radio when | you're on a Slack/Zoom/Teams call. | smoldesu wrote: | Dankpods did a pretty good comparison of wired mic quality with | wireless: https://youtu.be/N6Y_Q7RYmmY?t=315 | skinkestek wrote: | More annoyingly for me they didn't show up in "Where is" or what | that feature is called in English, even if they had power and | were close to my phone and had been for hours. | | I recently wasted an hour or so thinking I must have left them | behind at kids soccer training while they were just out of sight | next to me. | xg15 wrote: | > _I get that Apple is trying to be clever and anticipate your | moves, which I genuinely appreciate, but when it gets in the way | it 's annoying._ | | I wonder how long until devices regularly do eye tracking to | figure out which device we're currently paying attention to. I | think that could both be useful and extremely scary... | poink wrote: | Annoyance 4 is the biggest one for me, with the additional | annoyance that "only one works sometimes" extends to charging, | too. One of my AirPods will be dead when I go to use them ~10% of | the time. | unethical_ban wrote: | I didn't read the whole article, and this is quite a | conversation. However, I have to ask: Why oh why is digital voice | quality downgraded to telephony quality, when the computer and | buds both play crystal musical audio? This happens for me in | Windows, and IIRC in Mac as well. What about the audio device | being headset vs. speaker changes things at a technical level? | | This only seems to happen for Bluetooth. Using a RF gaming | headset or a wired connection causes no issue. | | keyword: Annoyance 3 | smaudet wrote: | globular-toast wrote: | I've bought 2 pairs of headphones and 2 pairs of earphones in my | entire life so far (I'm 36). And guess what? They just work. Is | it really worth it just to not have wires? | jakereps wrote: | The absolute worst annoyance, IMO, is that if you are listening | to audio with an iPhone, AirPods (Pro), and an Apple Watch, and | set a timer on your watch (say, a 1.5 minute rest timer at the | gym) it will disconnect from your phone to play the alert from | your watch and then fail to play music from your phone again | without sometimes requiring full Bluetooth cycling, or another | 1.5 minutes of fiddling - removing any and all convenience of the | device ecosystem. There are support issues open on the Apple | forums going back years, but it's still unresolved. To contrast, | my Bose SoundSports can seamlessly achieve the above example just | fine, so it's not a fundamental flaw in the use case, just | Apple's implementation of some part of it. | jonahx wrote: | My addition... | | Annoyance 0: | | The default behavior is to pause when you remove a single earbud | while listening to music/podcasts. But, especially when working | out, this is not what you want, because you just wanted to | scratch or wipe off your ear. At minimum, this should be an | option I can set ("only pause if both buds are removed"), but | afaik it's not. | ushakov wrote: | my personal complaint: sometimes the left earpod doesn't boot | | both are fully charged, but when i put them into ears, only the | right one actually connects | | i have to put the left one back into the case and take it out | again to get it to connect | | i assume this is a software issue | throwaway287391 wrote: | If you're within the warranty period (or have AppleCare) you | should definitely bring them into an Apple store. It might be a | hardware issue. If you describe the problem to them they will | almost certainly take your word for it and give you a free | replacement left AirPod. Even if it's not a hardware issue | you'll get a fresh new battery for one ear :) I've done this | several times between my two pairs of airpods. | DrZootron wrote: | Annoyance 8: More for those on a call with people using airpods | or listening to them be interviewed on a news show - the audio | quality is akin to that of a a tin-can-and-string phone. | j_m_b wrote: | relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2055/ | | Bluetooth is still a nightmare after being around for over 2 | decades. Meanwhile, my wireless mouse with USB dongle just works. | ChrisMarshallNY wrote: | Annoyance 1 (the biggest one), and Annoyance 4 are the standouts | for me. | | ANNOYANCE 8: Updating the firmware. 'Nuff said... | dilliwal wrote: | Annoyance 0. Your blog post date is wrong | | But you have a point, I share some of your annoyances | shaunpersad wrote: | Airpods are by far the worst Apple product I've ever owned, for | all the same reasons the author listed. I genuinely don't | understand how they can still say they Airpods are "fantastic" | and "wonderful". | | I would say on average I encounter these issues 50% of the time. | Most of my day is doing Zoom calls and either myself or the other | party (using Airpods as well) will spend the first 30-60 seconds | either switching out for another pair of headphones or trying to | get theirs to connect. | | I'm sure most of these issues actually have to do with Bluetooth, | but the criticism still stands. Have we just convinced ourselves | that they're great for some mysterious reason? | matthewdgreen wrote: | Airpods work wonderfully compared to previous headsets! Apple | vastly improved the pairing process and reliability over | previous products. | | What Apple needs to polish is the multi-device support. If | you're going out for a walk with your phone they will work | (nearly) 100% of the time. If you have a Mac and a phone and | are switching back and forth for Zoom calls, they will reliably | annoy the crap out of you. Before WFH I assume Apple thought | this was an edge case, not something we'd be doing for hours | each day. | | PS Google Meet deserves some blame here, too. I often end up | with "Airpods for output, Mac speaker for input" and this is | entirely due to Meet's burying these weird defaults in a | Settings menu. | erwincoumans wrote: | I wished they were using a low latency bluetooth codec, such ad | AptX or Aptx-LL. | kristjansson wrote: | Most of the authors complaints are valid. I'm definitely guilty | of the 10-second 'Hello? Hello?' dance at the start of phone | calls. However, AirPods are such a good product I can forgive | them all of those flaws and more. | | One hidden feature: I was walking around my city listening to | something on AirPods Pro. A truck in the lane adjacent to the | sidewalk braked hard, making painfully loud squeal. Except I | didn't hear it. The AirPod on the street side entered noise | canceling mode quickly enough to silence almost all of the sound, | and stayed there for a few seconds afterward before reverting to | ambient sounds. I'm not sure if that was a purposeful feature, or | just a volume limiter for the ambient-noise mode kicking in. | Regardless, it was one of the most delightful experiences I've | ever had with a product. The thing just quietly, casually making | my day a little bit better, then getting out of the way again. | adh636 wrote: | So if I'm understanding this correctly, you had the device set | to let in ambient sound, but a motor vehicle slamming on the | brakes was filtered out, and you consider this to be a good | thing? Sounds dangerous to me. | kristjansson wrote: | It was still audible, but filtered from 'damagingly painful' | to 'perceptible', and only on the side that was directly | exposed. I don't find a lot of navigational value in | listening to someone's poorly maintained brakes while I'm | walking around. | Bud wrote: | His gripe about the buzzing sound in AirPods is easily fixable | and he obviously didn't even bother checking. Just went straight | to blaming Apple. | | Apple will replace AirPods with this issue. For free. | | Several of the other gripes are spurious as well. | justinator wrote: | Oofta. Is anyone having trouble with white text on black | background? That was a design anti pattern that I thought died | out in the early 2,000's. | d23 wrote: | How's that an anti-pattern? With dark mode, it's more in style | than ever now. | [deleted] | justinator wrote: | It's an accessibility problem, especially for people (like | me) who have astigmatism. But y'all don't look away from | white text on black background to a bright light source (like | a page of black text on a white background) and get a "burned | in" impression of the previous page in your vision? Lucky | you. | | Dark mode is fine, please let the user choose to have dark | mode when she wants to. | lotsofpulp wrote: | I wish HN had a dark mode option. | justinator wrote: | Whip up some css to your liking and inject it into hn's | HTML - there's lots of examples of people doing things | like that. | lotsofpulp wrote: | I only browse it on Safari in iOS when I am wasting time. | notapenny wrote: | Out of sheer curiosity, is it just the white on black and | would a "softer" light-grey on dark-grey be better for you? | Or just generally light on dark? | UI_at_80x24 wrote: | I actually prefer it. It's easier on my eyes. | misterS wrote: | This is called "dark mode" nowadays, and it's a feature. | martneumann wrote: | Same for me. It produces some glare for me and I use dark mode | almost everywhere. | | I also don't like the huge font. Looks almost what I'd expect | an h2 to look like. | justinator wrote: | There IS also a difference (as well) between Dark Mode and | pure white text (or close to it) on pure black background. | Usually a Dark Mode will have the contrast be slightly less | (both text and bg are grays). | | Sorry to point this out, but it IS a UI design site, and the | person is griping about the minutia problems of an Apple | device, so: fair game. | smoovb wrote: | Back to my $15 Xiaomi Mi earbuds after trying the Airpod pros. | While not great for calls, battery life after a year of use is | 10x better than the Airpods. Plus a better fit for my ears and 0 | fear of loss. | tarunkotia wrote: | I love the AirPods but stopped using it because of what I have | been reading about EMF radiation emitted constantly even when not | in use by AirPods. I still need to read-up more about it till | then I am using the wired headphones. | | https://www.macintoshhowto.com/hardware/extreme-emf-exposure... | dools wrote: | You can disable that automatic connection behaviour in the airpod | settings from each device, that resolves a few of the issues | rcfox wrote: | e aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww | wwws | KSPAtlas wrote: | The date on the article is either wrong, or the article was made | by a time traveller | chaostheory wrote: | Annoyance 1 drives me insane. I don't understand why it would | switch when I'm actively listening to something. It should ask | first on the new device instead of automatically switching. | m12k wrote: | >Annoyance 4: Sometimes, only the left or right AirPod plays | sound. Taking them in/out of your ears doesn't fix it, you need | to put it back into the case and take it back out, which | sometimes, doesn't fix it. So you need to put your AirPods in/out | of your case two or three times to fix it. | | I run into this too, anyone know what's up with that? Is there | some "listen with only one headphone in" feature that I'm | accidentally enabling? | timemct wrote: | Yes, there is a listen with only one headphone feature. | dijit wrote: | It's not a feature it's a bug that will affect nearly all | Bluetooth in-ears that don't share a receiver. | | The design of Bluetooth buds is such that one of the buds is | elected to be the receiver of data from the phone, it then | propagates its signal to the second bud. | | What you're experiencing is a disconnection of one earbud to | the other. | | FWIW: apples AirPods Pro's rehandshake (from the "slave" side | towards the "master" side) every 10s- so you can have a lot of | luck just waiting for it to reconnect; that is assuming that | the slave device _wants_ to reconnect; it might believe it's | not in your ear. | toyg wrote: | I disagree, it's definitely a feature in my book. It allows | me to keep listening or stay on calls basically forever. | hbn wrote: | The ability to listen with one headphone in is definitely a | feature, but the issue is that sometimes that's happening | when it shouldn't be. You pulled both Airpods out of the | case, put them in your ears, but only one connects. And you | can't get the one with no sound to play sound until you put | it back in the case and try again (sometimes takes a couple | attempts) | toyg wrote: | Yes, it's meant to reproduce the traditional one-earplug | bluetooth experience for busy people. It also allows one to | effectively bypass battery limits: if you hear the battery | alert, you take one earplug off and put it in the case - it | charges so quickly, it makes it doable to put it back on before | the other dies, and then you recharge the other. | _1 wrote: | I don't think that's specific to AirPods .. I have Sony's | bluetooth earbuds and that occasionally happens. Sometimes just | waiting a bit and one of the ears will reconnect on its own. I | chalked it up to the bluetooth standard. | nuccy wrote: | I have a solution for that: with bare hands close your ears | tightly with Airpods in them. Depending on the duration of such | covering Airpods either just mute for a moment, or disconnect | and reconnect right away. This helps to re-sync if one is | ahead/behind another, or if one is not connected. I do that | occasionally with my Airpods Pro connected to iPhone, Android | or Macbook Pro - same outcome in all these cases. Such | connection "reboot" helps in most described cases, though | occasionally explicit Bluetooth toggle Off/On is needed, | especially with the Macbook. | | I imagine that hands and head create an improvised Faraday | cage. Though 2.4GHz Bluetooth signal should nevertheless pass | thought the body tissue, likely there is just a signa-to-noise | ratio rapid drop which forces Airpods to re-establish the | connection. | tjpnz wrote: | >After several years of usage, my first two pairs of AirPods both | developed a buzzing noise which became unbearable. The only | solution I found was to buy a new pair. | | Is that really acceptable for premium headphones? My Bose QC25s | continue to work fine after almost eight years of daily use. I | realise that there's more which can go wrong with the AirPods, | but two (?) years isn't much at all. The author should've taken | the issue further rather than just giving Apple more money. | capableweb wrote: | It's acceptable if it's something you're used to the practice. | Many Apple users use their products for seemingly infinite | amount of time before retiring the device, but even more users | keep buying the newest and greatest when it comes out because | A) they want to have the latest and/or B) what they currently | had broke and the accepted solution is to buy new. | gnicholas wrote: | Apple doesn't allow you to use ANC on AirPods when you have only | one ear inserted. | | But there's actually a setting -- buried deep inside the | Accessibility preferences -- that enables this feature. | | Why wouldn't they make this the default? Who would want ANC to | work only some of the time? And what does this setting have to do | with accessibility/disability? | ynniv wrote: | I've had it run with only one ear, and it feels uncomfortably | lopsided. Maybe if you could only hear in one ear or had a | hearing aid in the other you would want to enable this. In | general, accessibility settings seems to be a place immune from | the simplicity police at Apple. There are often useful features | in there. | gnicholas wrote: | I completely agree. I actually just wrote a blog post called | The Best Accessibility Features You've Never Heard Of, which | details some of these features that Apple, Google, and Amazon | hide within accessibility settings. [1] | | 1: https://beelinereader.medium.com/the-best-accessibility- | feat... | ahepp wrote: | unless you were deaf in the other ear, why would you want to | use ANC in one ear only? | gnicholas wrote: | I use one ear at a time, both for battery purposes, and so I | don't have the two AirPods communicating with each other | through my brain. | | I realize that we think nothing bad happens from the | emissions from AirPods, but this may change in the future. | Some have pointed out that prior studies involved devices | that were not stuck quite so far into our ears. | | Since I listen to podcasts and books, I have no need to use | two simultaneously. | omgitsabird wrote: | Does no one else view "it just works" as an incredibly annoying | phrase? | nneonneo wrote: | Annoyances 1 and 7, at least, can be solved by disabling the | automatic switching logic. When connected to the AirPods, under | Bluetooth -> (AirPods name) -> Connect to this {iPhone/iPad/Mac}, | select "When Last Connected" instead of "Automatically". Repeat | for each Apple device. | | It's a simpler mental model and it works way more reliably. No | more weird handoff prompts and no unexpected switching. Yes, you | have to select the device manually, but that takes just seconds | from the control center or audio output menu. | | I definitely agree with some of the other annoyances, although my | AirPods have been generally very reliable (and much more so than | my other set of wireless buds!). The weirdest one to me is that | Apple is still using the crappy HFP profile for bidirectional | audio, leading to annoyance #3; I'm surprised Apple hasn't just | engineered their own bidirectional audio profile, because the | sound quality drop is so noticeable that it's laughable. | knowingathing wrote: | This is true... but I like the automatic switching when it does | work :) | | I try my hardest not to adjust Apple defaults too much because | on the whole, I really like their design decisions and their | UX. So I don't want to start straying too far away from their | core defaults. It's a slippery slope :) | jhaile wrote: | Annoyance 5 is the worst for me: the 5-7 second delay when | switching from Mac to phone. | | I'm usually on my Mac during the day, Zoom calls, Spotify, etc. | Then I get a phone call. If I just answer, it doesn't auto-switch | fast enough. And if I manually switch, it regularly doesn't | switch at all on the first try. And even when it does switch, | there's a 5 second delay while the other person is going "hello? | are you there?" | [deleted] | baybal2 wrote: | One of my past coworkers worked on AirPods hardware. | | One thing he could've said under gazillions of NDAs: software | came much behind the hardware. | tpict wrote: | I swear that the automatic switching feature was almost flawless | when it first shipped, but at some point the "is the user paying | attention to this audio source" heuristics were changed. It now | seems very eager to switch to my phone and reluctant to switch to | my Mac. | | There was also a bug for a period of months-I need to check to | see if this still happens, I've conditioned myself not to trigger | it-where | | 1. I put in my AirPods | | 2. I click them in the audio drop-down in the Mac menu bar to | connect | | 3. The "Connect to AirPods" notification appears | | 4. I click "connect" because I'm already connected and it's the | biggest target to dismiss the notification | | 5. the AirPods DISCONNECT! Come on... | sorahn wrote: | I have slightly the opposite problem. My AirPods are too eager | to reconnect to my Mac. | | If I'm in a phone call with someone, on my phone, using my | AirPods, and my Mac decided to play a single alert for whatever | reason (slack, mail, text, whatever) the AirPods IMMEDIATELY | connect to the Mac to play that one single notification, and | leave me trying to shout across my house to my phone to tell | the other person to hold on. | | Super frustrating. | plonkus wrote: | A few commenters have mentioned the service program -- I think | it's worth mentioning that if you're experiencing sound issues | (buzzing, crackling) Apple will repair/replace AirPods Pro even | if they're out of warranty (up to three years after the sale, | which currently includes all AirPods Pro). I just sent mine in | this week. | | https://support.apple.com/airpods-pro-service-program-sound-... | mgoetzke wrote: | As for 1) You can configure devices not to auto-connect unless | previously connected | lowercased wrote: | That simply doesn't work for me. Regardless of what options I | set, about 60% of the time, if I'm talking on an iphone with | airpod pros, and I walk within a few feet of my mac (which does | have a connection to the airpods), it will switch from the | phone while I'm talking and... there's no reliable way to get | that back. In the phone app, clicking 'airpods'... is slow as | molasses and sometimes shows them as connected again, but... no | sound. Speaker works - the call is still ongoing. If I walk far | enough away, _sometimes_ it will reconnect, but not usually. | The only near reliable way is to disconnect the airpods in the | bluetooth menu, then wait, then reconnect. This is annoying as | hell for the person on the call to have to sit through. | | Yeah, sorry Apple support... I've only got the ios 15.x from a | couple weeks ago. No doubt upgrading to the very latest will | definitely solve all extant problems, everything will magically | 'just work' and there will be absolutely no new problems | introduced. /s | | When I describe this to some Apple store folks (2x last fall), | they seemed 'shocked' (couldn't tell if it was fake or not). | "Wow, never heard of that - no one's ever told me that before, | that doesn't seem right. We have some training classes next | week you can sign up for". | jdminhbg wrote: | In case you don't know this, since it isn't obvious, you have | to set them not to automatically connect on each device they | are paired to. And if you unpair and re-pair them you have to | do it again. This is annoying but not as annoying as auto- | pairing. | Nextgrid wrote: | I hope it works for the parent, but in my case even that | doesn't work. Whatever extra protocol or other crap they | introduced with this "automatic switching" feature is | garbage and worsens the experience even if you disable the | new functionality. The audio menu and | connection/disconnection being slow as molasses is a new | thing introduced by this change. | lowercased wrote: | Yeah, doesn't work. | | "Connect to this iphone" in bluetooth settings.. | | Options are "automatically" and "when last connected to | thi..." | | These don't even make sense as options, imo. | | What I think they're meaning is "automatically | connect..." and the options are "automatically" and "when | last connected". But.. if the software is broken, and it | 'magically' connects when I don't want it to, then that | will be the last time it connected anyway. | | "NEVER" needs to be an option. | jdminhbg wrote: | "When last connected" is supposed to mean "if this phone | is the last thing they were connected to when they were | put away last time, connect to this phone when they are | taken back out." "Never" in that context would mean each | time you put them in, you would have to go to your device | and manually connect. | | Of course if that's not working, that's a problem, but | conceptually I think the options make sense. | IndySun wrote: | "It Just Works"... This is merely a tagline from Apple, an | advertising slogan. As such, I have never taken it seriously - | let alone the fact that it is also a hollow statement. Who | does/did takes it seriously? | | That members of the wider YC community do take it seriously, or | worse actually believe and re-bark it in the first place, just | shows that, in this instance, being fluent in 'tech' is not a | panacea for gullibility. | dewey wrote: | I encountered several of these annoyances myself. Turning off | auto-switching removed some issues with them randomly jumping | between devices but now it's just more manual labor to connect | them. | | Having had my share of annoying buzzing sounds I wrote these up a | while ago, since I got them replaced 3 times I don't have any of | these any more though: | | - https://annoying.technology/posts/abea6876cf4f2e13/ | | - https://annoying.technology/posts/d3e6a4bce1e140b2/ | | I'm still using them every day and despite the annoyances the | small form factor and the sound quality are just good enough to | put up with it. | dsizzle wrote: | I got two pair of AirPod Pros replaced twice too. I wonder if | OP knows about the defect and program that Apple will replace | them? | | https://support.apple.com/airpods-pro-service-program-sound-... | eadmund wrote: | You know what always just works? Plugging headphones into a | headphone jack. | | It also uses significantly more well-developed technology which | does not require the use of rare earth metals and eye-wateringly | complex semiconductor manufacturing processes. | | And those wired headphones will still be in use years or even | decades after those AirPods have corroded to nasty plastic and | metal lumps in a landfill somewhere. | criddell wrote: | You still have that option but you might need to buy an adapter | which doesn't seem like such a big deal. | | Those wired headphones with noise cancelling and transparency | modes probably do require eye-wateringly complex | semiconductors. | recursive wrote: | You'll never need an adapter if you never buy an audio- | producing device lacking a jack. | | Passive attenuation seems to be almost as good as active in | my experience. And when you factor in that the headphones no | longer need a battery, it's a net benefit in my book. | criddell wrote: | Most people aren't upgrading their phone for audio | functionality (I believe cameras are the biggest driver of | upgrades). The fact that you need an adapter to continue | using your favorite headphones isn't going to raise many | eyebrows among the general public, especially when they are | mostly moving to wireless headphones anyway. | juramento wrote: | Yeah, I suggest trying -other- brands of bluetooth earbuds and | then write a comparison. After experiencing more frequent and odd | annoyances, for me AirPods really do "just work". | kbos87 wrote: | AirPods are great when they work, frustrating when they don't. | Mine seem to be in a frequent pattern of not connecting to my | phone automatically lately, and I couldn't tell you why. I don't | feel like that was happening nearly as often a few months ago and | I'm guessing it has something to do with the many updates and | changes they've made to how Bluetooth connections between AirPods | and iPhone seem to work. | | I've also experienced my fair share of quality issues - static | coming through when noise cancelling operates, which Apple | replaced my AirPods under warranty for.) Now I'm experiencing a | very tough to describe effect where one AirPod seems to cut in | and out of transparency mode repeatedly and in a subtle way. | | All in all they are a great product and I agree with some of the | other commenters that for all their flaws they are miles ahead of | anything else I've tried. | namelosw wrote: | I'm using AirPods Pro & Max and multiple Macs. They're | frustrating sometimes, but still substantially better than most | Bluetooth devices especially Bluetooth headphones. | | Bluetooth is such a crappy technology that blocks for better | wireless implementations we could have. | bredren wrote: | I also think these are overall the best wireless headphones on | the market. Not just in Bluetooth connectivity. | Nextgrid wrote: | AirPods _used_ to work. They no longer do. | | I got AirPods shortly after they were released and they were | great. They were basic Bluetooth headphones with a decent, | minimalistic UI that "just worked". They wouldn't try to be smart | and just remain connected to the last device they were on, which | worked well 90% of the time and the last 10% wasn't a problem | because the connection process was very quick. Under the hood it | was presumably just bog-standard Bluetooth which is good enough | and can actually be reliable given my experience. | | But then Apple couldn't leave "well enough" alone and decided to | over-engineer and fuck everything up. They tried to do the whole | multi-device thing where it's supposed to automatically & | seamlessly switch between them, and the problems in this article | arise from this - presumably they've now overlaid an extra | management layer & protocol on top of the existing Bluetooth. | Even disabling the automatic switching feature doesn't help, as | the extra complexity seems to still be involved in the background | and makes once quick operations take much more time. | | Connecting to AirPods from the audio menu on another device now | takes much longer and doesn't always work - sometimes it'll keep | spinning and eventually time out for no reason. Connecting via | the Bluetooth menu always works and is faster - I wonder why the | audio menu doesn't just do whatever the Bluetooth menu does? Same | story on iPhone - connecting via the audio menu is now error- | prone and I sometimes have to try again using the Bluetooth | settings. | | Also a problem I have which I suspect is an isolated bug but is | still annoying is that since these new changes, I simply cannot | get within range of my Macbook without my music playing though | AirPods on an iPhone stopping. I suspect the automatic switching | garbage they introduced, which despite being disabled, still | plays a part. The AirPods don't even actually switch so it's not | like the setting didn't apply, they remain connected to the | original device but merely _pause_ , so in the end it's the worst | of both worlds as it's not even giving me the extra functionality | and just ruins something that used to work perfectly. | | Not to mention, in typical Apple fashion, all these overlay | protocols have zero observability and you can't even tell what's | going on beyond a spinner that eventually times out. Same with | AirDrop, HomeKit, etc but at least those are used infrequently | enough that they aren't too big of a deal in practice, but | AirPods are particularly problematic especially in a post- | pandemic, fully-remote world. | | Of course, given the recent changes to iPhones, wired headphones | are no longer an option either unless you keep dongles around. | They should've either switched the new iPhones to USB-C or added | a Lightning port to Macbooks so that wired headphones could be | used without a dongle you'll inevitably be missing when you need | it. | fab1an wrote: | Yeah, they're great, but definitely not quite perfect / magical. | Another thing I noticed is that using the noise cancelling | ocassionally gives me terrible, luckily short-lived tinnitus. | Never encountered that with other (over or on ear) noise | cancelling devices. | bamboozled wrote: | Pretty sure I had that from my QC 35 II | danielktdoranie wrote: | Mine work great. | Audiophilip wrote: | For me personally, one of the most infuriating product design | decisions that Apple made was the removal of the headphone jack | from the iPhones and iPads. This is literally the only reason why | I switched to Android, despite being a long-time Apple user. | grujicd wrote: | Too bad Android manufacturers want to emulate Apple even with | bad decissions. Headhpone port is getting rarer with each new | release. Samsung S21 line doesn't have it in any model afaik. | robin_reala wrote: | I stayed with Apple, went through three of the super-fragile | 3.5mm adaptors, and now am on a third-party "heavy duty" | adaptor. Let's see if this lasts. | ianthiel wrote: | I've experienced most of these issues. Also, it appears this | blogpost is from the future? | scrollaway wrote: | A list of a variety of bugs isn't what I expected from the title. | | Airpods are nice, but outside the Apple ecosystem they're | horrendous (and somehow still better than most alternatives...). | The proprietary chip / protocol in use makes me sad, but what | makes me even sadder is that they're not actually even working on | supporting them as a good product on Android. | | Maybe it makes economical sense but it's really sad that we got | to the point that a company can release hardware and go out of | their way not to support a significant amount of potential | customers. This feels like what anti-monopoly regs try to | prevent, but it's not a monopoly either so ... | | Also, the microphone quality is a lot worse than people say it is | (I'm using the Pro version). They are barely usable for calls in | a loud environment. | recursive wrote: | Apple has always gone to lengths to prevent their products from | interacting outside their walled garden. The last straw for me | (more than a decade ago) was when a firmware update closed a | gap I was using to load music onto my ipod without going | through the hateful ITunes synchronization process. | jgrahamc wrote: | I had one pair of AirPods and left the charging case on a plane; | getting a replacement case was a pain because I had to prove the | AirPods were mine. When the battery died in them I gave up on | them completely. Battery life too short, too easy to lose, and | environmentally not sound. | loevborg wrote: | I don't have AirPods, but every time I've had a meeting with | someone who does, the microphone quality has been terrible, even | in quiet environments. | | The sounds has been muffled to the point where, while I could | still understand the person, it took me 50% more cognitive effort | to make out what they were saying because of the low quality. | It's almost always much better when I ask them to switch to the | built-in MacBook Pro mic (which is decent). | | It's an insidious problem. People like their setup because _they_ | can hear you well. But what they don 't realize is that they are | themselves barely understandable. They don't hear themselves and | people aren't used to giving them feedback. | | Is it just me? | vxNsr wrote: | It's not just you, but please let them know. I was experiencing | this as the AirPods user but wasn't aware, it's kinda hard to | know because even if you turn on "listen to this device" it's | not quite what zoom/teams sends. | Invictus0 wrote: | I have the "listen for Hey Siri" thing enabled on my iPhone and | also my MacBook. I would like to be able to use this to start | playing music on the Macbook. But when I say hey siri, and both | devices are in range, they both answer, then the macbook shuts | off, and siri proceeds only on the iPhone. | pjerem wrote: | If you think you have Bluetooth issues with AirPods, just try | Apple Watch. It works, yes, but rarely. | londons_explore wrote: | When one customer finds 7 gripes, and they aren't an outlier, the | product is bad. | | A good product would have 1 gripe found by 1 in 7 customers... | jmacd wrote: | There is something weird about the AirPods Pro product line. I | think a lot of us who are very technology focused can appreciate | the marvel of engineering that they are. Long battery life, | excellent noise cancellation, the right weight, water resistant, | etc. | | By many of my friends and my wife, all of who work in non tech | fields but otherwise are 100% apple device people, all seem | pretty much not impressed by them. | | For Christmas I got my wife a pair of Nothing headphones. They | are 1/3 the price and I figured it was worth a try since she | basically just stopped using her AirPod Pros. | | Now she raves about these cheap Nothing headphones. Tells her | friends they are better. Less obtrusive, clear so they stand out | less, good audio quality, and they don't try to magically switch | devices, they just wait for you to decide what you want them | connected to. | | They support AAC on Apple, but have not great Bluetooth Audio | support for Android. | openknot wrote: | The price of the AirPods Pro ($329 USD, though they go on sale | for a significant discount quite a bit) might be a reason. | | I purchased no-name Bluetooth wireless earphones for ~$55 USD | before the AirPods Pro, and they were shockingly good for the | price (super small, lightweight, long battery; similar | observations that your wife reported about the Nothing | headphones). I got the AirPods Pro after that, expecting a | massive upgrade, but really the only significant difference was | the noise cancellation (which is why I still use them | primarily). The easier switching between Apple devices is nice | too, but for my use case, I mostly use the AirPods on my phone | anyways. | | So for the price differential between generic headphones, I | would expect a massive upgrade, but now it feels like a nice | upgrade but pretty expensive for what it does (especially since | I'll have to consider replacing them once the battery | degrades). | dvtrn wrote: | Very similar story with cheaper no-name bluetooth wireless | earbuds. Honestly..despite the other complaints in the thread | here about regular bluetooth earbuds...I've had a MUCH better | experience with them than the airpods at doing one thing: | being wireless earbuds. | supernintendo wrote: | I've had the polar opposite experience with the Nothing Ear 1: | | - I can't seem to use them for extended periods of time without | running into this issue where one earbud stops playing audio | entirely and I have to fully reset them to fix it. | | - The audio completely cuts out every 5-10 minutes for a brief | (like under a second) moment, leading to these annoying gaps in | whatever I'm listening to. | | - After pairing, the audio will sometimes be extremely low | quality, output in mono or not output sound at all; usually | unpairing and pairing fixes this. | | - Firmware updates have done nothing to resolve these issues. | | I tried reaching out to Nothing support to try to return them | but have been unable to get a response. These headphones are | unusable and probably the worst tech product I've ever | purchased. | pwenzel wrote: | Thank you, I've had my eye on those and was searching this | thread for just such a review! | orkon wrote: | I seem to experience troubles like that with any kind of | Bluetooth devices. E.g., sometimes they don't connect or | disconnect or lag. At this point, I am suspicious of the entire | Bluetooth technology. The same is with WiFi actually: it does | work well most of the time but sometimes it does not (for | whatever reasons, bugs? changes in environment?). | ConceptJunkie wrote: | I find Bluetooth to be the flakiest of the common technologies | I use. There are just way too many times that it just doesn't | work for no discernable reason. | | I have 3 cars with Bluetooth and they all have their quirks, | but they generally work. The Ford Fusion, which boasts the Sync | system "by Microsoft" is the worst, though. It will always show | the little Bluetooth icon soon after starting the car, but when | you try to switch to your device, it says there is no Bluetooth | device and I have to connect manually by selecting the phone | (which Ford lovingly places behind about 8 knob turns and | clicks). And of course, sometimes it simply refuses to | acknowledge there is a phone at all, so we keep an analog | audio-in cord handy. | | And I have had a couple of different Bluetooth phones. My | previous phone was a Samsung Galaxy 4 Mini that I replaced | about 6 months ago with an A52. Bluetooth always worked fine | with both phones, but again, there are quirks. In my Honda | Civic, the old phone would automatically connect to the car's | system and start playing whatever music I'd left off within | about 20-30 seconds, whereas with the new (and much nicer) | Samsung A52, it takes 2 or 3 minutes... or until I get | impatient and select the phone manually. | dep_b wrote: | I had AirPods since the launch day. The battery was not great to | begin with and they decayed pretty fast. After that they're | basically trash as replacing the batteries is about as expensive | as buying new ones. | | I'm back to EarPods now. Don't listen to music on my phone | anyway. | glxxyz wrote: | I've given up with AirPods Pro. I had to replace them several | times during the warranty period (once was a recall). Even when | working correctly they would have annoying connection problems, | for several conference calls I had to switch back to an old | school wired pair, which just always works. | | My attempt to have the case (which only showed life while | connected to power) resulted in Apple throwing away my working | AirPods and trying to upsell me a whole new case + 2 AirPods (at | above market price, with no charging cable, and a shorter | warranty). | | If you do still have AirPods out of warranty- a support adviser | admitted to me that they don't actually service them, and they | don't replace one component alone- if you send them in for repair | they just toss the whole thing and sell you a new set. So if only | one piece is broken just report it as lost and they'll charge you | to replace it. | Me1000 wrote: | I usually dont buy AppleCare for my products, but I figured | since this was a 1st gen AirPods Pro and they were so small | AppleCare was justified this time. And boy am I glad I did, | I've had my AirPods Pro replaced like five or six times now. | | Issues I've experienced: | | - Loud random static noise (usually for about .25 seconds). | It's like someone screaming in your ear. I've experienced this | now with TWO pairs. | | - Noise canceling/transparency mode just stopping working when | you touch them. | | - "Hey Siri" just stopped responding (not usually a big deal, | but that's usually how I make calls) | | - One pair just stopped working entirely. Wouldn't charge or | anything. | | - Each ear would get out of sync until you took them out of | your ears. | | AirPods Pro are by far the worst Apple product that I | purchased. I regret buying them. I suspect the regular AirPods | don't have most of these issues since I think the issues were | mostly related to feature specific to the Pros. | | I can't imagine how angry I would be if I hadn't purchased | AppleCare with them, so many defects. | TYPE_FASTER wrote: | Annoyance 1 - you can configure auto-connect per device. I have | three computers and an iPhone that have been paired with my | AirPods. I only have my iPhone configured to connect to my | AirPods automatically. | | Annoyance 2 - since you hear the "connect" tone when the AirPods | connect to a device, my guess is the author's AirPods have | connected to a device they are not looking at. This is what was | happening to me before I realized the auto connection was | configurable. | | Annoyance 3 - this happens for my other Bluetooth headphones that | have a microphone when using Mac OS as well. It's a Mac OS issue. | I've noticed with a recent update that it happens less | frequently. The fix is to set the audio output to the computer | speakers, then back to the AirPods. | | Annoyance 5 - yeah, switching takes time. Based on my experience | with Bluetooth devices, I'm not sure how much this is AirPods | specific. I ended up buying a pair of the Sony WH-1000XM4 | headphones because they can connect to two Bluetooth devices. | This solved the switching delay, with the caveat that the mic on | the WH-1000XM4 is not great so I also bought a cheap USB mic for | meetings. | cybertim wrote: | And to add to this, i learned to not use the 'bluetooth' icon | to manage the AirPods, instead use the 'triangle with broadcast | signal'-icon found next to the volume in the control centre or | on many other different locations on your ipad, iphone or apple | tv. | | Just turn off the auto-connect feature and start using that | icon, all the mentioned 'annoyances' will go away :) | Veen wrote: | > triangle with broadcast signal | | The AirPlay icon. | | https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface- | guideline... | fastaguy88 wrote: | I wonder, does "just work" mean work perfectly 100.000% of the | time. Or is 99% of the time close enough? | philjohn wrote: | re: annoyance 1, there is a setting to disable this behaviour | I_am_tiberius wrote: | Without Apple device a firmware upgrade is not possible. | simonista wrote: | Two suggestions that might help OP with some of these annoyances: | | - See the "Turn off automatic switching" section of | https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212204, to take manual control | of when they switch devices | | - In System Preferences -> Notifications & Focus you can switch | any apps notifications from "Alerts" to "Banners" which will make | them go away automatically when ignored. | JeremyHerrman wrote: | Unfortunately the nearby headphone notifications are not | generated by an app, so you can't use the normal notification | banner settings. The only way I've found to disable them is to | go to Bluetooth preferences (while the headphones are | connected), click options next to the headphones, and change | the "Connect to This Mac" dropdown from "Automatically" to | "When Last Connected to This Mac". | | I'm not satisfied with this solution since I enjoy the | automatic switching between devices, but I'm driven crazy by | the notifications that pop up on my mac literally as I'm | listening to music with those headphones on my iPhone. C'mon | Apple - this is all within your ecosystem! | gman83 wrote: | My airpods broke so I bought some EUR25 Bluetooth earbuds and | honestly they work just as well for my needs. The best thing is | not worrying about losing or breaking them. | kop316 wrote: | Heh, I got my spouse a pair of AirPods, and long ago she went | back to a pair of wired earbuds due to various issues with them. | IIRC, noiuse cancelling didn't work well and causes a lot of | sudio issues, there were connection issues all the time. The | cheap wired heaphones work much better for her. | | Out of curiousity, does anyone have a good recommendation for a | good pair of 3.5mm wired headphones with a microphone? I still | have an old pair of Bose Sport headphones, but they are only | wireless now. | lowercased wrote: | I generally like the QC20, but I think those were recently | discontinued. The mic wasn't _the best_ , but for regular | conversations generally didn't have problems if I clipped the | mic to a shirt. If it bounced around and rustled on a shirt | that wasn't good, but that's going to be a problem with any mic | on a wire, I'd think. | kop316 wrote: | Yeah it seems that all of the (in-ear) Bose wired headphones | were discontinued. | falcolas wrote: | The market, that ill-tempered, irrational screwball, has | spoken, and its says that everyone wants wireless | headphones. The manufacturers have listened, and fervently | believe that you're wrong if you disagree. | falcolas wrote: | Sennheiser Momentum. | | Or if you want a boom mic, some of the "Pro" or "G" branded | logitech headsets. | JohnJamesRambo wrote: | Still loving my cords and headphone jack... | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | The list of phones that still have a headphone jack is ever | dwindling. | blueflow wrote: | Best thing: They are dumb. They don't even need a power supply! | They don't have many ways to go wrong. | thefz wrote: | A million times. The "inconvenient" audio jack+cord does not | run on batteries that will end in landfills. And it's barely an | inconvenience at all. | martneumann wrote: | I'm not using Apple ear phones, but wireless head phones are | seriously practical. Anytime I have to use my corded ones when | walking the dog I get reminded of how they are actually pretty | handy. | | Still use cord ones in other circumstances. When lying down, | for example. I like to have the choice at least. | pluc wrote: | how the hell does a list of annoyances about a product makes it | to the #1 of HN | | oh Apple I get it | | you people need to diversify | recursive wrote: | We also have Tesla annoyances and NFT haters. That's pretty | much all I could hope for. | BenderV wrote: | Agree with the point of the blog, but the biggest hurdle for me: | | If you do a short and intensive sprint, Airpods usually will | register a click and skip to the next song... | faebi wrote: | Wow, this was a perfect description of my experience. An | additional factor is the release date of the used devices. My | experience improved by a large margin when I replaced my late | 2018 Macbook and my 2019 iPad. Another example are calls which | ring on multiple devices. I'm using my iPad and somebody calls me | on my iPhone, but the iPhone sends the call also to the iPad. The | same when I have MS Teams on my Macbook and my iPhone. Once I put | the Airpods in my ears anything can and does happen. Sometimes | one Airpod is lost in these situations. | graiz wrote: | Bluetooth is so broken at a deep and fundamental level. We should | really have a low-energy wifi protocol. The listed problems are | just the tip of the iceberg. | | The fact that my headphones can't be simultaneously connected to | both my phone and my computer is ridiculous. The connectivity is | awful. The latency of connection and disconnection is | embarrassing. On top of that Apple has the worst UI to handle all | of of the weird things that can happen. | shakna wrote: | > We should really have a low-energy wifi protocol. | | HaLow? [0] It's been around since 2016, but never saw any great | adoption. Which is a huge pity as it can actually achieve some | crazy good speeds for such a low power draw. (300+ Mbit/s). | | There's also LoRa [1], which _has_ a fair bit of things | implemented using it, but unfortunately it's super slow, and | has some serious issues around acks that make it unusable for | something like wireless buds. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ah | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoRa | howinteresting wrote: | Bluetooth LE is a completely different protocol from Bluetooth | classic. | thenerdhead wrote: | Here's a few more: | | - Airpods sometimes do not charge when in the case. Usually need | to pull it out and put back in again. | | - Knowing what airpod(s) and case are charging. The UI on the | phone, the open the case sliding window, the widgets, and the | case light itself are not very useful. | | - Spatial audio working on some apps but you're not usually aware | if it's on until you tilt an ear one way to confirm. | | - Out of ear detection sometimes doesn't work well and will drain | the respective airpod. | | - No preference list of what devices should have precedence over | others. Especially when working on 2+ devices. | | - Hand-off calls is a weird UX. Why would I answer a phone on my | iPhone by default when it's clear I have airpods connected and | being used? | | - The transparency / noise cancelling dance. Not sure if there's | a preference, but it feels random which one is on by default. | Always do a double check at the gym or when running as outside | noise sounds loud. | | Still the best headphones and experience in my opinion and have | enabled me to achieve a hell of a lot more because of them. | Easily worth the price for how much I use them. | spacemadness wrote: | Out of ear detection is my biggest gripe. If I take them out | quick and place them on a table because I don't have the case | handy, they try to reconnect when I'm receiving a call or using | audio in any way without them. I have to look for the icon in | control center and manually remove them. It's incredibly | annoying. | | I also noticed the membrane sounds like it's getting blown out | when they attempt to deal with loud noises in the environment. | hbn wrote: | Am I crazy or have Airpods gotten worse recently? I didn't get | mine until recently (November?) and for the first month or so | they kinda did work perfectly. The auto-pairing was annoying | like the article mentions (switching from my Mac where I want | it to my phone cause I pulled it out to look at something), but | I turned that off and it was all good. But at some point in | December I started constantly getting the issue where one | doesn't have audio playing and I have to put it in the case to | reset it, sometimes the tap gestures don't work, it'll pause | when I pull one out (as intended) but doesn't unpause when I | put it back in, etc. I wonder if they pushed some bad firmware. | | Oh, also here's another complaint: when your Airpods are | connected to your iPhone, they HAVE to be the microphone. Which | is annoying because for one thing, their microphone is way | worse than the one built into your phone, and the other thing | is in winter I usually have my AirPods concealed under my toque | so my ears don't freeze off, but that means literally no sound | will make it to the microphone, and I'm just SOL if I want to | use my microphone (and when it's freezing out, I'm less likely | to want to try typing a message with the keyboard, so it would | be nice to just send a voice message to someone, but I can't). | Of course no one at Apple will ever experience this cause | they're all in California! | germinalphrase wrote: | Clearly, no one at Apple considered cold weather when | designing the pinch based Airpod Pro interface. Just about | impossible with gloves. | hbn wrote: | Yeah, that's actually one of the reasons I didn't go for | the 3rd gen even though they were out when I got mine | | I can't use that through a toque, whereas with the 1st gen | I can double tap the side of my head through the toque and | it pauses | saurik wrote: | Yeah: the tapping interface for the original AirPods is | one of the most interesting mechanisms I'd ever seen, | both obvious in retrospect and yet not at all obvious. I | think of it as one of the more "inspired" mechanisms I've | ever seen in such a product... and then they replaced it | with "the kind of thing an idiot might have built". | | And like, I know the pinch mechanism _does_ have some | smarts to it: it isn 't even really a button, and the | thing you think you are pinching is haptic feedback; but | that frankly just makes it _worse_ as the _only reason_ | why the pinch feature is better than the tap feature is | because the tap feature had an unfortunate requirement | that you had to have it in your ear to use it (and to the | extent to which it would accidentally work when not in | your ear was, fwiw, annoying)... | | ...but then, for some inexplicable reason, they decided | that the pinch feature also shouldn 't work if the AirPod | isn't in your ear, only, due to the dynamic haptic | feature, squeezing it suddenly isn't a button anymore and | I find myself just squeezing it harder, twisting it | around trying to find the button, until the part of my | brain that knows how it works turns on and goes "there | isn't really a button there" and I go into problem- | solving mode to figure out I need to put it in my ear | again for it to work. | | The tapping interface was (/is, as I still have them) | incredibly intuitive on that front: the part of my brain | that wanted to interact with it fundamentally got that | "you have to put this in your ear in order to tap it", | and I don't ever use them wrong. But with the new pinch | interface, I've had a pair ever since they came out (and | now have a pair of the AirPod 3, which I don't like | anywhere near as the old ones) and I continue to | routinely attempt to pinch them when they aren't in my | head. | | What is crazy to me is that I've complained about this to | various people and the response that I tend to get--both | from people "in the know" as well as end users giving me | this exact complaint back--is that a sizable number of | customers apparently really really _really_ hate tapping | their head: they find the action annoying and the sound | it makes in their skull / ear canal unfortunate. The | pinch interface is simply sufficiently boring that | everyone seems to be willing to do it without squinching. | :/ | dont__panic wrote: | I really wish they'd add an LED per AirPod in the case, as an | easy visual indicator that they're properly seated and | charging. I don't know if I'm especially oily or something but | both pairs of AirPods I've used have had charging issues in the | case after just a few months, and it's so frustrating that it's | almost impossible to tell if they're _both_ charging in there. | | Nothing like going out for a run and figuring out 50 feet down | the road that your audio is only playing through one bud. | mns wrote: | Ha, the preference list is interesting, I don't know how some | stuff works for Apple when connecting the AirPods even with | multiple apple ids. I had my girlfriend connect her AirPods to | my iPad to watch a movie on the plane. A couple of weeks later | I was using airplay to stream a game on the TV, while my gf was | in another room wanting to watch something on her phone | connected to her apple id. All of the sudden sound goes off on | the tv, and after a couple of seconds stream is paused. She | comes in that the game was playing on her AirPods. I have no | clue how the AirPods connected to my laptop after 1 month of | her using her airpods only with her devices. | Lamad123 wrote: | 28 January 2022?! First time in my life reading something before | it was published! | d23 wrote: | I have many of these problems plus: the advertised tap-to-control | behavior never seems to work when I want it to. It only activates | when my AirPods are misinterpreting my adjusting them as trying | to pause what I'm listening to. And, of course, tapping again | doesn't restart playback. | dijonman2 wrote: | Airpods Max are a disaster! I had trouble with bt range on my | qc35 ii, switched to sony and will never go back. just wish I | could return my airpod max, they're engraved | imron wrote: | Try using them on Linux. Then they really don't just work. | | As headphones yes but good luck using the mic. | davidbenhaim wrote: | deleted | Nextgrid wrote: | > My bose headphones that used to work great now don't work as | well as airpods. | | My _AirPods_ experience has also declined the past couple of | years so I think it 's just over-engineering and ruining the | perfectly functional Bluetooth and/or audio stack rather than | an intentional attempt at ruining non-Apple headphones. | HatchedLake721 wrote: | Can people stop overusing and throwing the word "monopoly" | every time they're not happy with an Apple service or product? | | What's next? Apple is monopoly on ARM? Smartwatches? Monitors? | Touchpads? | | It sounds like a cheap internet attempt to bash a company using | a lately popular but completely irrelevant word in relation to | AirPods. | | I use both AirPods and Bose QC35 II for years, everyday for | hours, without any issues. I haven't had my Bose quality of | experience degrade, so I don't know what you're on about. | | You enable pairing mode, select your headphones in list of | Bluetooth devices, that's it. | | They even swap between Mac and iPhone without much issues. | soared wrote: | Apple has not degraded 3p Bluetooth - that is bullshit. My Bose | work just the same as they did years ago and behave similarly | to my AirPods. | | You cannot expect Apple to not develop better features in their | own products. | | This is not anything close to monopoly and it's wild to say | that. | [deleted] | tksb wrote: | > ...Airpods have a ton of extra UX settings in iOS that are | not available to other bluetooth headsets. | | To be fair, AirPods have "a ton" of hardware capabilities built | in that are also not technically available, but that's kind of | exactly the point, right? | jon889 wrote: | It would be nice if audio from all your devices played at once | through AirPods instead of it trying to switch by guessing which | one you want to listen to. In exactly the same way you can hear | all your devices at once if not using headphones, the advantage | being only you can hear them and not anyone else. | | Eg if watching TV on a laptop with headphones but you get sent a | TikTok or short clip on your phone it plays over the TV and you | just tune out the TV for a few seconds like you would if your | were at home watching TV while using your phone. | sancho_panza wrote: | It's so nice being able to bt connect to my Apple watch for the | lovely ambience of tick, tock, tick. | spoonjim wrote: | I bought a pair of AirPods Pro and I loved how they sounded but | hated how they made me look, because my skin is very dark and the | little white things stood out like sore thumbs on Zoom calls. I | returned them for the Jabra Elite 85t which are less comfortable | in my ears but which match my skin color much better. Apple lost | more than $249 of revenue because they don't make them in black. | | There's something to be said for considering the diversity of | your market. | mbreese wrote: | Annoyance 1 actually has a setting. You can setup the AirPods to | actively switch to a preferred source (your phone), or stay | connected to your computer. This one bugged the hell out of me | for months before I found the option. | | https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/switch-airpods-betwee... | | _> To prevent AirPods from automatically switching between | devices, go to Settings > Bluetooth. Tap the Actions Available | button next to the name of your AirPods, tap Connect to This | iPhone, then tap When Last Connected to This iPhone._ | medbrane wrote: | Note that you have to configure that on each device separately. | mbreese wrote: | Very true, and it's not very intuitive, but at least the | setting is available. | | I guess that's the problem with "it just works" magic -- when | it doesn't work, you need to have a few settings available. | And unfortunately, those are rarely included. | nemacol wrote: | It is my opinion that bluetooth headphones are garbage. | | I have several - cheap, expensive, ear buds, over ear. They all | suffer from issues between devices, one device out of range weird | noises, can't decide which device to connect to. Some of the | issues I blame on my phone (Pixel3a). | | I spend so much time walking around my house turning BT off on | all but one device so I can go outside and listen to something. | | Much easier to plug my wired headphones into the device I am | using. It is simple, reliable, and I don't have to charge my | wired headphones. | | For me BT headphones go mostly unused except for | yardwork/woodshop time, where the wire poses extra annoyances. | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | BT is garbage except for very simple products like mice: poorly | thought out, even more poorly implemented, generally brittle. | | And the audio quality is compromised, although aptX Lossless | may finally start changing that. | tapoxi wrote: | I'm a Bose QC-35 II convert. Slide forward on the power button | and it'll switch the paired device. Also excellent sound | quality and ridiculous battery life. | AndrewWarner wrote: | Most of my frustrations with AirPods could be eliminated if they | connected to multiple devices at once. The back-and-forth does | not work well. | brenelson wrote: | Try getting another set of Bluetooth earphones, then weigh in the | quality. | whynotminot wrote: | I would posit that the AirPods _used_ to be the most magical | "Just Works" Apple product I've ever owned, but over-time as | Apple has added more features and complications to them, they've | lost the magic. | | Those first generation AirPods were a thing of beauty. Newer ones | now are technically better--better sounding, longer lasting, ANC, | etc. But I've experienced a lot of the same annoyances that OP is | complaining about. | | I still love them, but the experience is definitely a little | fiddly these days. | cabirum wrote: | I want so much the wireless headphones fad to go away. | | When batteries deplete in the middle of a meeting, what are you | supposed to do? Connect a spare pair via usb dongle? | mmcdermott wrote: | I don't generally struggle with battery in meetings (I | prioritize battery life when buying ear buds), but I keep a set | of wired earbuds with a USB-C in my laptop case as a backup. | They don't come out often, but they have gotten me through a | couple of meeting marathons. | myko wrote: | After replacing mine 3x and my latest Pros just shitting the bed | (the left one has a weird echo sound in it, but the Apple Store | says it's fine so they won't do anything) I'm done with AirPods | | Hopefully the Samsung Buds I have ordered are better | qwertox wrote: | My "it just works"-setup is the following: all devices are | connected via a cable to a cheap audio mixer, including one | Bluetooth receiver to which my phone can connect to. | | The mixer has a long cable to a well positioned spot in the | apartment and the cable ends with a Bluetooth transmitter. A | small (4cm x 4cm x 1cm) Bluetooth receiver has wired in-ear | headphones connected to it and that's it. | | This receiver has small a magnet glued to it, and the desk has | another magnet glued to it. The USB-charging cable also has a | magnetic adapter so that the micro-USB end is left in the | receiver, and when I leave the desk I just have to pull the | receiver way, which stops the loading process since the USB cable | is also easily separated. When I get back to the desk I just snap | the receiver to the magnet of the desk, and if I feel that I | should charge it (no issues with using it 6 hours without | charging it), I just snap the magnetic end of the cable to the | receiver. | | Every device which wants to send me audio can do it, and I can | move freely around the apartment without any interruption. | | When I go out I use another Bluetooth headset connected to the | phone. | | The annoyances listed in the article would drive me absolutely | mad. | | --- | | Basically 3 of these: https://www.amazon.de/1mii-Bluetooth- | Transmitter-Dual-Verbin... (one for phone, long cable sender, | magnetic receiver) | | one of these: https://www.amazon.de/Moukey-Mischpult-Mikrofon- | Keyboard-B%C... | | one of these: https://www.amazon.de/JEEREE-Magnetisches- | Schnellladung-Magn... | | and all the cables needed to connect the devices to the mixer. | | I have this setup for some years now, so my gadgets are not the | ones listed here, but an older equivalent. APTX-LL removes any | noticeable delay between video and audio. | jensensbutton wrote: | Annoyance 8: I get anxious when I get on a video call and see the | other person is wearing airpods because they're always cutting in | and out. | bironran wrote: | My one mega-annoyance is no mute button. Not being able to mute a | Zoom call (or a phone call) using just the Airpod hardware | interface is... annoying. I don't use Siri that often and would | honestly remap long click as mute/unmute. I'm willing to pay | premium for that feature alone. Hell, I'm willing to subscribe | that feature. Apple, "take my money", just give me a mute button | that works without the phone (or watch, or laptop). | ZitchDog wrote: | The worst part about the click is that it hangs up your call. I | was on hold with the IRS for 3 hours and hung up on the | representative when I adjusted my airpod. Rage inducing! | PragmaticPulp wrote: | I generally enjoy my AirPods. They are occasionally quirky, but | most of the time they really do "just work" for me. The | annoyances are annoying when they happen, though. | | The strangest part is that the annoyances aren't getting any | better over time. At first I assumed that they were growing pains | of an early product launch. Yet now we're years into the AirPods | experience and they continue to be just as quirky as when I first | got them. | | Apple seems so hot or cold on fixing their own bugs. Certain bugs | get rapidly patched in the next iOS or Mac software release. | Other bugs languish for what feels like forever. Do Apple execs | just not use AirPods? Are they using a different configuration or | hardware combination that doesn't have these bugs? Have they just | trained themselves to overlook the bugs because the workarounds | have become a reflex? I can't imagine working at any tech company | where one of the flagship products had such a high rate of | annoyances without having a lot of engineers diverted to | replicating, diagnosing, and fixing it ASAP. | Nextgrid wrote: | In my experience, the annoyances actually get worse over time. | | I got my AirPods back when the original ones were released and | the experience probably was as good as physically possible | (short of including multiple radios so they can maintain | connections to multiple devices in parallel and simply mix the | audio client-side). | | They then (2 years ago?) released this new feature where | AirPods could automatically switch between all your devices | which is just too slow and is more of an annoyance in practice, | but even disabling the behavior made the existing experience | much worse: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30085538 | Gigachad wrote: | Yeah I totally know what you are talking about with it being | too slow and unreliable. But it's also the primary reason I | use airpods. They are the only device I know of that let me | almost seamlessly switch between my macbook, iphone, ipad, | and while running they connect direct to my watch. It's worth | so much to me that I don't even consider any competitors. | | And I will put up with a lot of quirkyness or waiting for | connection to have that. | TrainedMonkey wrote: | Whoa I thought that was just me. It used to be pretty easy to | switch the device AirPods are connected to. Now, AirPods | connect to the right device in 50% of the cases, 30% of cases | they do not, but I can click connect on the new device and it | works, remaining 20% the only way to get things working is | either manually disconnecting on the device they attach to or | putting them in the case and trying to get happy scenario | again. | | To summarize, things are generally better but way less | consistent. | indemnity wrote: | It's not just the AirPods, the experience is as crappy on | the AirPods Pro and Max. | hughrr wrote: | The experience is mostly crappy when you involve macOS. | No problems moving around iOS here with my Pro's. | [deleted] | liber8 wrote: | I agree. When I got my first pair roughly two years ago | (after years of using various versions bluetooth earbuds you | could buy on Amazon for $20) they seemed like magic. Take | them out, they automatically and nearly instantly connect, | and almost never had any issues. | | I just bought v3, and while the sound is noticeably better, | the connections are all over the place. At least once a day, | the connection simply dies. Multiple times a day it decides | to connect to another device that I'm not using. If you | answer a call and then put an airpod in your ear, it's got | about a 50% chance of connecting, after a multi-second delay. | Sometimes it says its connected, but it's not, so the iphone | isn't emitting sound from its speakers and nothing is coming | out of the airpods, leaving me sounding like an idiot | repeating "can you hear me now?" until I manually kill the | connection and use the built in speakers. Absolutely | infuriating. | a-dub wrote: | i don't know if it's limitations of the bluetooth protocol, or | necessary optimizations in order to maintain battery life, but | in my experience most battery operated bluetooth devices seem | to have pairing issues. | | i suspect that it's probably a combination of three things: | | 1) reliability is hard when on a power budget. if power was | free, they'd just always be looking to renegotiate, but since | power is limited, they probably are very miserly about this | process which leads to getting stuck in states that require | power cycling to force retries. | | 2) interoperability is hard with open standards, especially old | standards that are complicated. | | 3) open standards come with limitations that sometimes cannot | be worked around. (this is where i'm surprised apple hasn't | just cheated as they usually do when open standards result in | ux they find unacceptable, this leads me to believe the problem | itself, of distributed consensus between multiple wireless low | power devices with potentially noisy links, is actually _very_ | hard) | | when you think about it, the technology behind wireless earbuds | is nothing short of astounding. they're little battery operated | wireless two node compute clusters that can literally fit in | your ears, stream audio and maintain nearly perfect | synchronization when rendering that audio in the most absolute | basic use case. | asdff wrote: | >The strangest part is that the annoyances aren't getting any | better over time. | | Like most of what apple releases lately. People claim apple | maps is better now, but its still missing a lot of data around | the LA area especially with local business that Google maps has | no issue crawling, and generally shoddy navigational asks (like | unprotected lefts). Siri has also gotten no better since its | release 10 years ago now (wow), if anything it defers to | coarsly googling my terms more and throwing me the first couple | irrelevant results as a response. If I wanted to do that I | would open a browser and touch to talk into the search field. | hsbauauvhabzb wrote: | I don't care, I want google maps and I want the default to be | google maps, but there's no way of setting that, I even tried | uninstalling apple maps and now when I click on addresses it | prompts me to reinstall it. | | Didn't Microsoft get done for antitrust for similar dark | patterns in the late 90s? | JoeJonathan wrote: | I hear you, though Google Maps still seems terrible with | unprotected lefts in LA. Just yesterday, it directed me to | make one one onto a six-lane road. | asdff wrote: | They seem rarer for me with Google maps. Imo I think | rerouting is better with google maps as well. If I get an | instruction like that I'll ignore it and turn right and | Google will pick up a new routing before I get to the next | intersection. If I do it with Apple it might ask me to do a | u turn after a right turn and still try and make that left. | To be fair I don't use apple maps at all anymore but I see | it fail horribly whenever my partner uses their phone for | navigation. Its missing a bunch of local businesses and | restaurants and sometimes looses the GPS lock on the phone | too (like assuming you are on the parallel road to the | freeway and trying to route you back on rather than | correctly assuming you are still on the 5 and didn't | teleport onto surface streets) | lqr wrote: | If by "unprotected" you mean "no green arrow", in what part | of the LA area is it feasible to avoid unprotected lefts? | They are all over the place in my neighborhood. | | If by "unprotected" you mean a left from a stop sign onto a | street that does not stop, then I agree. They can be almost | impossible. Waze was especially notorious for them a few | years ago. | asdff wrote: | The latter I mean. "Take a left on pico from this stop | sign, hold your breath and good luck, no one will let you | in." Somehow google maps ignores these and prefers me to | make a right out of a parking lot or a stop signed street | and take my lefts at lights (or off the major arterial) | seems like its just a simple set of rules you can apply to | your navigation algorithm to avoid these entirely, but the | fact that they are still there years later tells me the | Apple maps designers really don't care too much. | deergomoo wrote: | The maps themselves are fantastic if you live somewhere | covered by the latest round of updates. I think the business | data will _always_ be trailing Google Maps though. Google has | their entire search engine to grab data, they crowdsource | data via app notifications, and in cases where businesses are | updating their own info it wouldn't surprise me if they do it | on Google Maps and just don't bother anywhere else. | | Siri does continue to be lame though. Driving is the one | place I would want to use it for anything beyond timers and | reminders, but I don't dare because I can't check to see if | it's doing anything dumb. Last time I tried to text someone | while driving using Siri, it got picked up by my Apple Watch, | which worked great, but also my phone, which picked the same | message up and promptly sent it to a totally different | contact. | dannyw wrote: | Apple seems to only improve peripherals (like the AirPods) with | new hardware releases; not software updates. They make money | based on units of AirPods moved. | germinalphrase wrote: | Not strictly true in this case. Apple added a lot of | additional functionality to the airpod pros over time. The | tuning is hidden under the accessibility settings, but it's | there. | Gigachad wrote: | They have added some things to the airpods over software | updates. But I assume they are pretty limited if they are | already pushing the hardware to the absolute limit on | release. A lot of the stuff they push over updates seem to be | things they already planned to have but perhaps didn't have | the firmware polished enough yet. | arcticbull wrote: | Extend that to AirPods Pro. My right ear cup crashes | periodically - then I can only hear out of the left side until | the watchdog timer engages and nukes the left cup too. I | frequently have to reset it by holding down the buttons for 10 | seconds in order to get it to connect to anything. It | frequently disconnects and refuses to reconnect if I take off | my mask out from under it. It stops detecting my head | occasionally. An iOS bug probably, but I can't change the Mic | mode anymore when on calls - it just shows me them menu options | but I can't tap any of them. And the ear cups started to smell, | lol, but there's no clear way to actually clean them due to | their, well, magnets. I bike to work and have to dry them when | I arrive because sweat builds up _under_ the cups. They 're | also just too big to fit into _anything_ practical, so I end up | just carrying them around in one hand. | | All in all, they're fine, but they most certainly do not just | work for me, and they're not a $600 product IMO. | initplus wrote: | If you are experiencing all of these reliability issues, have | them replaced by Apple. My original AirPods Pro had some | serious issues. Firmware would update on only one of the | pair, and so preventing them both from connecting to the same | device. Or one would just crash frequently... | | After having both replaced I have had zero issues since. I | assumed it was some hardware quirks with earlier models. | arcticbull wrote: | That's good advice. I'll set up an appointment. | COGlory wrote: | Can I ask why you purchased them in the first place? They | seemed very obviously to not be a $600 product from their | announcement. | symlinkk wrote: | Are there any other over the ear headphones that provide | great sound quality, noise cancellation, pair with | computers and smartphones, and have a solid mic? | | I've looked at the Sony XM1000's and from what I understand | there is some issue with Windows where if you enable the | mic, it goes into some different Bluetooth mode that | degrades the audio quality coming out of the headphones. | Many wireless headphones are advertised to only work with | smartphones. | | I just want something that does it all, connects to all my | devices, and works. | withinboredom wrote: | Wait is there a device that can do stereo AND mic? I'm | not aware of any and I've searched long and hard. AFAIK, | there is no way it is possible with the current BT spec. | Are you saying your Apple headphones can do that? | fphhotchips wrote: | A quick look through Reddit shows that no, they can't. ht | tps://www.reddit.com/r/airpods/comments/kg3w4n/airpods_ma | x... | hsbauauvhabzb wrote: | 21h2 and more recent versions of Linux allegedly add | these codecs, but I don't know how that played out in the | real world | arcticbull wrote: | I used my Developer Transition Kit credit, as I'd already | purchased an M1 laptop and had no need of anything else - | other than headphones. | nsxwolf wrote: | I like "workarounds become a reflex". This is a very succinct | way of describing one of the causes of why people often claim | to have no issues using something that universally has issues. | | A great example is the gaming PC vs gaming console war. PC | gamers often seem to refuse to admit there's untold little | quirks you have to deal with when using a general-purpose | operating system and modular hardware to play games. They don't | notice the workarounds they are continuously employing, because | it's become a reflex. | Hokusai wrote: | > there's untold little quirks you have to deal with when | using a general-purpose operating system | | "Though initial iterations of the software for the original | Xbox and Xbox 360 were based on heavily modified versions of | Windows, the newer consoles feature operating systems that | are highly compatible with Microsoft's desktop operating | systems, allowing for shared applications and ease-of- | development between personal computers and the Xbox line." | Wikipedia | | > and modular hardware | | This is true. There are, e.g., fake GPUs that will make your | experience quite bad. I always buy pre-build PCs from my | favorite tech store, and I have personally avoided the | problem. But Steam forums show that some people is not so | fortunate. Also there is people trying to run modern games in | very old PCs, consoles solve that problem by not running new | games in previous generation consoles. | musicale wrote: | > newer consoles feature operating systems that are highly | compatible with Microsoft's desktop operating systems, | allowing for shared applications and ease-of-development | between personal computers and the Xbox line | | Microsoft created its Universal Windows Platform (UWP) to | enable software to run across multiple Windows devices from | desktops to tablets to consoles. It has not really been a | resounding success, though it has some inconvenient | limitations as well as business restrictions such as being | tied to the Windows Store. | | Even the Windows Store has moved away from UWP by | supporting Win32 apps. | marcan_42 wrote: | It's not about the OS technology in use, it's about all the | practicalities of how it is deployed on consoles vs. on | desktops. Things like immutable OS volumes, fixed | configuration tested on the hardware, the extent to which | they build higher level automation to do what the user | expects, etc. "The Xbox One runs Windows" ignores all these | details which make it a much more seamless experience than | on a PC. The PS4 runs FreeBSD, but try gaming on FreeBSD | and let me know how it goes in comparison... | | Honestly, it's plainly obvious that gaming on consoles is | much more seamless than on PCs. If you don't think so, | you're not recognizing all the little quirks you're dealing | with on a PC. When was the last time a driver update broke | a game on a console? Ever had to install support software | to make a game work well with a particular controller? | Issues with overlays and system feature integration? | Unexpected performance loss due to a weird configuration? | Mysterious DRM malfunction issues? Windows Update gone | wrong? Those things (mostly) just don't happen on consoles | because it's a much more controlled ecosystem. | Hokusai wrote: | > When was the last time a driver update broke game on a | console? Ever had to install support software to make a | game work well with a particular controller? Issues with | overlays and system feature integration? Unexpected | performance loss due to weird configuration? Mysterious | DRM malfunction issues? Windows Update gone wrong? | | I agree (I don't get why people downvotes). My argument | is that a quality PC does not have that problems. The | fact that you can get a very cheap PC creates many of | this situations. But I get into "No true Scotsman" | territory with that logic. And that is why I agree with | your arguments. | marcan_42 wrote: | But those things I mentioned happen regardless of the | hardware build quality. Hardware quality will avoid | hardware issues, things like overheating or stability | problems. The things I mentioned are software integration | problems that are a natural consequence of the PC | ecosystem being much more heterogeneous. It doesn't | matter how good your hardware is. | | There's just no way around the fact that when your | ecosystem gives people much more choice and flexibility, | it's going to be jankier than one which doesn't. It's | just math. As you add dimensions to the problem space you | reduce the fraction of the problem space you can test to | ensure the user experience is good, and you rely on users | to figure out how to reach a good point in that space, | since you can't do it for them. If your dimensions are at | least separable you might have a better chance (linear | scaling instead of exponential), but modern systems are | too complex to keep one issue from influencing others. | It's a massive engineering problem. | nsxwolf wrote: | There's also a lot of little things. Like, you launch a | game and there's no audio. Well, Windows at some point | decided to switch audio outputs on you. You may have a lot | of them. Line out, headphones, a bluetooth headset, a | virtual out for streaming software, a monitor with built-in | speakers - and now you've got to click the little speaker | icon and try to figure out what should be selected, which | may be named after the driver or hardware vendor and not | totally obvious. | | That's the sort of thing that for the most part just | doesn't happen with the consoles, because they're limited | and tuned for the intended experience. | cuddlybacon wrote: | On my PC each legitimate output device has a duplicate | with the same name that does nothing. Every once in a | while when I launch a game it will switch to the | duplicate entry and I will have to switch it back. It's a | quirk where the fix has become a reflex. | | I've never had to deal with this on any console I've | owned. | Hokusai wrote: | > Well, Windows at some point decided to switch audio | outputs on you. You may have a lot of them. Line out, | headphones, a bluetooth headset, a virtual out for | streaming software, a monitor with built-in speakers | | I agree that I have found that problems. I just get the | same problems with my TV (Samsung) when I have several | audio devices. Maybe one can argue that is a TV problem, | not a console problem. But non-portable consoles need a | TV to work. So, the problem exists but it's moved | somewhere else. | | After your comment I realize that portable consoles are | that ideal all-in-one, at least older ones without HDMI | or Bluetooth. | wanderer_ wrote: | Yeah, there's something to be said for playing an online | game in which everyone has the same exact hardware | (mostly). This is coming from a person who occasionally | plays competitive games on a 2012 Thinkpad and comforts | himself when he loses by saying, "it's ok, their computer | cost as much as a used car. Don't feel bad about losing". | | Happy 10th birthday T-530, 1 decade and still trucking! | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> A great example is the gaming PC vs gaming console war._ | | Which war was that? A bunch of teenagers and man-children | arguing online between PC vs console superiority is in no way | a 'war' and is anything but a great example for "workarounds | become a reflex". Online squabbles between rabid fanboys and | brand loyalists should be left alone and not be used in | logical debates. | | _> PC gamers often seem to refuse to admit there's untold | little quirks you have to deal with when using a general- | purpose operating system and modular hardware to play games._ | | I highly doubt your broad generalization is accurate. Do you | have any sources for your claims? Every PC owner and gamer I | know both online and IRL openly admits this hobby is not a | smooth sailing endeavor. Again, I would love to see your | sources for your claims, otherwise I feel HN is degrading | into reddit where people make broad fact-less generalizations | with no arguments and others upvote regardless because it | gives them self-approval and dopamine hits. | | _> They don't notice the workarounds they are continuously | employing, because it's become a reflex._ | | My personal example would be MacOS, when I, an outsider who | never regularly used MacOS, point out various UX quirks that | trip me up and cause issues for me rather than make my life | easier as I was promised, I saw that everyone I know who is a | long time user of MacOS got so used to the quirks that they | formed some workarounds that turned into reflexes and just | became part of the experience and not viewed as issue anymore | but as tolerated and expected behavior. Basically for them | MacOS is simpler because they already know the quirks and | workarounds inside and out, not because it's objectively | simpler than the alternatives. Same goes for long time users | of Linux and Windows if you're coming from the other side. | | So in the end it's not about one being objectively better | than the other, it's about people always will have more | issues with the things they don't know very well and be | subjectively biased towards the things they already know and | like. It's the nature of humanity. | rashkov wrote: | I recently upgraded from an iPhone XR and a lot of frustrating | software problems just went away. Nothing to do with AirPods in | my case, but it made me realize the effect of having an older | phone with less processing power and less developer attention | paid to it. I wonder if your AirPods problems might have to do | with having older devices connecting -- ie. the other side of | the Bluetooth connection. | diebeforei485 wrote: | It's not always processing power. Some of the older phones | had known issues, for example the iPhone 7 often had a faulty | audio IC, and the iPhone 6/6+ had low RAM relative to its | larger screen size and bigger graphic sizes. | | Prior to the 8 and XR, iPhones had Bluetooth versions 4.0 or | 4.2, which meant things were slower to connect, and also | meant lower microphone data quality. Apple hasn't done any | customer education around this. A lot of people with older | MacBooks have poor microphone quality when using AirPods - | but it's primarily their computer that is the bottleneck. | michelb wrote: | I have an iPhone 13 and I have all of the annoyances, often, | except 6+7. In fact I have had these annoyances with all my | iPhone and Airpods combinations. It's probably all due to | bluetooth, even though Apple uses their own W1 chip to | connect. | tobyjsullivan wrote: | I've similarly found AirPods both "just work" from a user | experience, especially compared to alternative bluetooth audio | devices, and also are quirky from a reliability standpoint. | There have been fixes pushed out in past, particularly with the | earlier models, where fixes could be done via OTA firmware | updates. | | The remaining quirks all feel related to Bluetooth tech and, | specifically, the low-power available to AirPods (compared to, | say, my giant Bose headphones). | | I can only speculate but I think AirPods are currently limited | by the bluetooth tech itself. What I expect we'll see is apple | will ship a version with a proprietary radio system. They | probably won't be compatible with non-Apple devices but they'll | be 10x better than today's AirPods (more reliable, simultaneous | audio from multiple devices, even better battery life, etc.). | | There's no guarantee Apple will pull this off. But I'd bet it's | far more likely there's a team of engineers dedicated to this | strategy as we speak than that Apple just "gave up" on one of | their best-selling product lines as soon as the MVP proved | there was a huge market. | saiya-jin wrote: | Man, you sure are overly optimistic. That part about | bluetooth doesn't make sense, tons of products work reliably | with similar dimension/weight restrictions as airpods. If | Apple with its army of engineers can't make their products | work reliably, how could have much smaller companies | succeeded? Btw one of biggest disappointments for me with | airpods (pro) is weak bettery life compared to competition. | | I am currently shopping around for new truly wireless | headphones for iphone and not a single comparison has apple | airpods/pro as winners in 2 most important categories (for me | but I believe for many others too): sound quality and battery | life. Same for their smartwatches but thats another topic. | | Apple, or any company, sees that even product with such flaws | still sells very well, so there is little pressure to fix | things asap. That some engineers somewhere are working on | next gen (or even 2 next gens in parallel) is expected, but | these generational updates are very iterative and never | revolutionary (that's what new product lines are for, for | much higher price). | | One anecdote from today - had a year end review call with my | boss while being on sick leave due to covid. He desperately | tried to pair his new iphone 13 pro max with his new airpods | (not sure if pro or regular) and gave up after some time. It | just didn't work and we had good old phone-in-hand call. | oriolid wrote: | Could you give examples of some Bluetooth devices that work | reliably? | guntars wrote: | If you know any bluetooth headsets that don't have similar | quirks to what the post talks about, let me know, because | otherwise I'm thinking this is Bluetooth and it wont get | better until we ditch it. | | Quirks of Bose AE2 that I'm dealing with: | | 1) Switching to the low fidelity Bluetooth headset mode | when the mic is activated. Why does this still exist? I'd | be happier if they just didn't add a mic if they can't | support better quality audio. 2) The headset nominally | supports connecting to two devices, except there's no | mixing. One channel is primary and will override the other. | Annoying when you're on a meeting on a laptop and a | notification arrives on your phone and the audio cuts out | to play the notification tone. 3) To add, sometimes Apple | devices just play silence? Meaning, the secondary device | will get muted and it will take a minute for you to figure | out why it's not playing. There's no user control over this | primary/secondary aspect. 4) Oh, yes, I use three devices | daily which results in a lot of manual switching. 5) The | devices or the headphones don't always automatically | connect for some reason. It's not clear either if it's from | me manually switching them or what.. 6) Endless issues with | Spotify "Failing to play song" when the audio output | switches. 7) Not bluetooth, but this headset gives the "Low | power, charge me!" chime when the battery is low, even when | plugged in and charging. | AlotOfReading wrote: | re #1: This is basically because it's written into the | standard that everyone implements. There are non- | standardized extensions to get around this that nobody | implements because they're non-standard and a perpetual | "This will be fixed by the next standard!". There are | also codecs that mitigate the issue by solving the | underlying bandwidth problem, but nobody implements those | because there's licensing and thus it's not universal. | All of this is made worse by the fact that there's really | only a few vendors out there. Almost everyone buys the | same stuff, which makes the same tradeoffs and the result | is that everything sucks in basically the same ways. | symlinkk wrote: | Which is why people pay extra for Apple products, because | they don't make excuses like "this sucks because of the | Bluetooth standard", they build something that works even | if it's incompatible with non-Apple systems. | dnadler wrote: | So, I just switched from Android to iOS, and I've noticed | that the bluetooth reliability is significantly worse | than what I've become used to. | | I switch from a Pixel 4a to an iPhone 11, and both my | Bose QC 35 headphones and Sony wireless earbuds are | having lots of issue that I never head on the pixel. | | So, my takeaway is that iOS is behind here, though I | don't know enough about the underlying tech to say | anything for sure. Just my anecdotal experience... | keltor wrote: | I've used 100+ Bluetooth devices and ever single one of | them had weird connection quirks. Hell every wireless | protocol I've ever seen has been similar excluding some | actual industrial stuff. | KerrAvon wrote: | Would love to know which BT products are actually reliable. | Seems like the best are only "reliable" relative to others | which are "downright unusable". | tobyjsullivan wrote: | My only other bluetooth headset is a set of Bose QC35s. As | sibling comments reported, quality is about par overall. I | find UX of Bose is worse on all counts when working with | multiple devices. And the battery life of my AirPods is | less on a single use, but much better overall considering I | can recharge in the case. | | My airpods, generally, also have to put up with more. I | don't use my Bose with my phone or on the go which is, | generally, where the AirPods experience 90% of their | quirks. | | That makes for a poor sample size though so would | absolutely love suggestions for more reliable alternatives. | | Edit: apparently I don't know how to spell Bose | erichurkman wrote: | > I don't use my Boss with my phone or on the go which | is, generally, where the AirPods experience 90% of their | quirks. | | My experience is the opposite. When I'm not on the go, | the likelihood that my AirPods pick up the right device | is slim -- like trying to connect to an iPad on a | complete different floor vs. the phone I'm trying to make | a call on. | | When I'm on the go, the only device they can find is my | phone, and all works great. | tobyjsullivan wrote: | Yeah, makes sense for that problem specifically. I don't | really have that problem ever. All my problems are | skipping audio, dropped connections in one pod, and other | intermittent problems. | | My Bose always connect to the wrong device in my home and | have zero method to correct. So I'm quite satisfied with | the AirPods which seem to get the right device 99% of the | time (no exaggeration - probably use 4x per day and | connect to unintended device maybe once per month). I'm | sure it helps that my phone is always on silent mode. | visarga wrote: | My AirPods2 switch to low quality audio - they sound like a 5$ | pair of phones, presumably on account of the microphone being | activated. | | I am very disappointed, already looking for my AirPods1 to | replace it. It's just not as easy to use as the old ones. They | fall off my ears, they die suddenly with no warning (old ones | were better in this regard). | | I mean, Apple makes the AirPods, Apple makes my laptop, so why | don't they ... you know ... make sound? They fail at performing | the main functionality. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | I would add to the list that it is environmentally negligent to | allow for such a complex device to be near irreparable | (specifically on battery replacement). | | Unless you are selling medical devices your electronics should | never be thrown away because after-sales cannot swap a battery. | Then again Google just dropped the Pixel 3 after just 3 years so | this is clearly an issue with the consumer electronics business | model. | | Consumer electronics will remain a vastly wasteful business | unless governments force tighter environmental regulations. | 323 wrote: | How many people do you see using 2010 smartphones with | replaceable batteries? | | Or put another way: people throw away phones after 3-4 years | regardless of if you can replace the battery or not. | | You can pretty cheaply replace the battery in any phone at a | repair shop. But people don't want that, they want the new | phone with new look and new features. | InitialLastName wrote: | How many 2010 smartphones are still getting security updates, | or updates that let them work with modern network standards? | LTE was only barely available in 2010, and 3G is almost gone | now. | 323 wrote: | LTE/5G is a hardware thing, you can't add it with a | software update. Yet another point that it's not the sealed | battery which is the problem. | InitialLastName wrote: | You can't add it with a software update, but you could | provide a modular phy (or continue support for older | standards). | 323 wrote: | Not talking about you since I don't know, but a funny | thing I noticed, is that people who are very loud about | saving the environment are always the ones with the | latest iPhone 13 Max/Macbook Pro M1 in their hands one | week after it's released. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Notice that you just went from "people don't really want | it", to "it's not really feasible", all the way to | straight up ad hominem. | 323 wrote: | It was a side point, because it's always very rich people | with iPhone 13 Max which are like "poor people should use | 10 year old phones, but not me, I can't be seen on gram | with that, I need credibility so I can speak out about | the climate" | | Modular phones were tried and were a complete market | failure. Because they sacrifice thinness, robustness and | water proofing. | | Older standards are removed because they are not used | anymore, so the bandwidth is freed for newer ones. | | And "people don't really want it" remains just as true. | Just like people didn't want small screens, until even | Apple famously yielded. | throwaway946513 wrote: | > Always the very rich people with iPhone 13 Max .... | | Funnily enough, I can name numerous people who use iPhone | 13 Pros/Pro Maxes, just bought this past year and are | certainly making less than median wage. | | Part of it is fashion, 'not appearing poor', and they may | only know iOS due to a history of using it. So no, the | very rich aren't the only ones buying iPhones. The stigma | that they are phones for the wealthy should go, just as | the idea that Android phones are for the poor. | | Many people I know who make well more than three or four | times what I do use a variety of Android devices. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | > How many people do you see using 2010 smartphones with | replaceable batteries? | | How many 2010 smartphones have security updates that you can | safely use? It's a chicken and egg problem. | | For every person that chases the shinny new thing there are | plenty of people who don't care about that and just want to | have minimal functions, phone, sms, video chat, some decent | photos/video, and occasional online banking. | | However due a broken business model from Tech giants and | firmware lock-in from Mobile SoC manufacturers this is | unattainable at the moment. | | Vendors should be forced to maintain an LTS work stream to | give the alternative to those costumers who do want to act | sustainably. Unfortunately that will never happen unless they | are forced by regulatory changes. | 323 wrote: | For the last 6 years, the average number of new smartphones | sold per year was 1.5 billion. There are 6.5 billion people | with smartphones in the world. So that's at most a 4 year | churn rate. | | https://www.statista.com/statistics/263437/global- | smartphone... | | https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in- | the-w... | GuB-42 wrote: | In 2010, smartphones were just taking off, every new | generation offered significant improvement. 2010 smartphones | are terrible by today's standards: small storage, | underpowered, no 4G, bad camera, etc... | | 2015 smartphones are a different story. Things have | stabilized, and a good 2015 smartphone should be perfectly | usable today, a bit sluggish, but usable. And interestingly, | that's when they stopped having user replaceable batteries. | More generally, the market shifted from real obsolescence to | planned obsolescence. | soared wrote: | Airpods are insanely small and the outside casing is pretty | much a single piece of plastic. I am all for right to repair, | but it does not seem feasible or reasonable for AirPods - | they'd have to be bulkier. | Gigachad wrote: | The airpods in entirety would be less waste than the | packaging most spare parts come wrapped in. It just feels | worse because they cost a lot more than a plastic foam pack | your steak comes in. | delecti wrote: | > they'd have to be bulkier | | Then make them bulkier. What's worse, filling the planet with | garbage, or a few industrial designers having _slightly_ less | impressive portfolios? | Gigachad wrote: | It's actually pretty bad for the airpods. The gen 3 airpods | are bulkier than the 1 and 2 which now means they don't | stay in my ears nearly as well. I never had issues with the | originals falling out which I now do with the gen 3. | ChicagoBoy11 wrote: | That's entirely fair, but the issue is the demand for the | less bulky bluetooth headset isn't there. To think that | this will be solved from the supply-side is wishful | thinking at best; if folks really demanded repairable | headsets, the supply would take care of itself. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | I mean there was no demand for more expensive unleaded | fuel but we still regulated leaded fuel out of existence. | What consumers want and what is needed for the | environment is not always aligned. | | Consumer demand is not a very good guiding principle for | environmental protection. | [deleted] | yepthatsreality wrote: | Apple consumers don't care about the environment, that's why | they buy products that need to be replaced yearly by choice or | by design. So these arguments are lost on them. | kristjansson wrote: | Just as a gentle counterpoint, consider the magnitude of the | problem. Let's say there are 300m AirPod units that have been | produced (60m sales per year for the last 5 years). Each unit | is about 2oz, mostly plastic and batteries. That's roughly | 20,000 tons. Los Angeles County alone (to pick a place) | generates about 100,000 tons of solid waste per _day_, of which | about 20,000 tons makes it to landfill[0][1]. If they were all | thrown away at once, all in Los Angeles, they'd hardly notice. | | Semiconductors and consumer electronics are more | environmentally sensitive than they were, and can be better | than they are. With the lithium and trace metals, AirPods are | more damaging pound for pound than bulk waste, and you're right | to insist that Apple do a better supporting recycle and | recapture. We should also focus on how those materials are | mined in the first place. | | However, even a repairable AirPod would generate lithium waste | as the batteries wear out. If we're going to have consumer | electronics, there's going to be a bit of waste. Let's just | keep in mind that real problems are coal and SUVs and beef and | so on. A business like AirPods (or all of electronics) that | generates fractional ounces (or pounds considering everything) | of waste per person-year while enabling environmentally- | positive changes like remote work is perhaps not the first | target for reprobation. | | [0]: | https://dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/swims/OnlineServices/reports.as... | [1]: https://www.laalmanac.com/environment/ev04.php | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Wholly agree that transportation and energy usage of | coal/natural gas should be our primary target. | fsflover wrote: | Related link: http://www.ibtimes.com/apple-airpods-repair- | recycling-imposs.... | mckeed wrote: | At least Apple pays to recycle them, which is more than most | companies making devices like this would do | https://onezero.medium.com/what-really-happens-to-airpods- | wh... | Raed667 wrote: | For anyone who wants something very close to "just works" | checkout the Jabra Elite 85t or 75t. | pbc wrote: | I use jabra 75t and personally I'm not that impressed with | them. Connection to 2 devices at the same time indeed works | fine, mic quality for earbuds is also very good. | | But they have other issues like if you remove the right earbud | from your ear the left one stops (due to their choice of tech | for bud to bud connection), sound glitches randomly when paired | to m1 macbook, in ear fit is ok but not great. | bamboozled wrote: | I have the 65t, absolutely love them, insanely solid, always | seem to have charge, pair to everything instantly. I wear them | during workouts and they get covered in sweat and chalk still | sound beautiful. | | Love them a lot and agree. Check out Jabra! | Raed667 wrote: | Had the 65T for years and can confirm. They are very solid | and sound great. | | I only upgraded when I lost them. And appreciate the smaller | size on the 75 model. | | I still very much recommend them to anyone on a budget. | jugg1es wrote: | I've never had a single problem with them besides the fact that | they think that they are in my ears when they're actually in my | pocket so they will unpause whatever you are listening to. | agency wrote: | I just upgraded to a pair of AirPods Pro after my old AirPods | were slowly losing battery life until they can barely get through | a single podcast ep. It was pretty cool and eerie putting them in | for the first time and having the noise cancellation activate and | just drop out all the ambient noise. I've never used active noise | cancellation and it really makes you realize how much ambient | noise you tune out. | | Beyond that I'm not 100% sure how I feel about them yet. They | definitely don't fit quite as well in my ears as the originals | and anecdotally a couple coworkers mentioned returning theirs | because they were falling out. And they definitely don't fit in | their case in the same way as the original. The way the originals | just magnetically fall into place perfectly is an amazing piece | of product design. Really makes them feel like some otherworldly | artifact. The Pros are definitely not the same in that regard. | amelius wrote: | Are AirPods safe for audiophiles? | resfirestar wrote: | I really hope Apple decides to improve things for their ecosystem | within the framework of Bluetooth rather than go their own way as | some people here have suggested. That route would almost | certainly lead to a proliferation of proprietary PAN standards | and allow cell manufacturers to tax (or just acquire) consumer | audio companies, many of which are struggling to compete with | AirPods already. Anyway, we're going to find out soon: Apple has | all but confirmed that they're working on something to solve | their Bluetooth bandwidth problem [1]. Could just be a new | Bluetooth profile, and I feel for the Apple users because that | would almost certainly just multiply these annoyances rather than | fixing them (wider audio quality gap = more people notice when | the connection is inexplicably stuck on the ultra-low quality | voice call profile which happens all the time, causes the OP's | Annoyance 3 and is one of the causes of Annoyance 4). But I think | we'll be better off in the long run if Apple and others in the | industry work on Bluetooth improvements that everyone can use | without paying up to Qualcomm. | | [1] https://www.whathifi.com/features/is-bluetooth-holding- | back-... | jonwinstanley wrote: | The bluetooth standard seems to move very slowly though. We've | had bluetooth headphones around for so many years and they | usually leave a lot to be desired. | bajsejohannes wrote: | Personally, annoyances like this is enough for me not to want | wireless headphones. My wired headphones work 100% of the time. | It's obvious what they are connected to. | | (PS, I also prefer transport belts over robots in factorio, and | explicitly constructed objects over dependency injection in | programming) | surfsvammel wrote: | Wow. I do agree with some of the annoyances, now that I read | them. But, to me, my feeling about my AirPods where the exact | opposite. I only got them recently, because I didn't quiet see | the point of yet another pair of earphones. But man, They Just | Work, has been my feeling about them so far and I have not | regretted getting them. | | Maybe I have not had them long enough to actually start having | them annoy me... | knowingathing wrote: | Basically, yes. That's been my experience. Even though I listed | all of these annoyances, I still really like them :) | j2bax wrote: | I've been using Airpods since day 1 and although they didn't | quite deliver on the promise of "it just works" when it comes | to connecting between multiple devices they have been my | favorite new technology since the iPhone released. They feel | like the closest thing to a fully realized "wearable" computing | device to me. I bought the Airpod Pro's the first day they came | out and haven't ever looked back to my wired headphone past. | They are the perfect balance of comfort and features for me. Of | course I'd like to see them improve and work out the general | bluetooth issues, but I can't imagine living/working without | them. | soheil wrote: | > Annoyance 7: When moving from working on my iMac to my MacBook, | I get a notification asking me if I want to switch my AirPods | over to my MacBook. The notification isn't an issue, but the fact | it doesn't go away after you ignore it is | | I have the same issue with Do Not Disturb notification on Mac. | There is no way to have it not show up if you have a set time for | DND unless you completely disable all notifications. | robertlagrant wrote: | I use Airpod Pros (no Apple, I will not say "Airpods Pro"). Some | of the gripes are familiar; some not. | StevePerkins wrote: | I have a $200-250 pair of AirPod Pros, and a $40 pair of Tozo | NC7's that I bought for a backup. The Tozo's get way more use, to | the point where I regret buying the AirPods. | | Your ears may vary, but "dot" style earbuds are WAY more | comfortable (and likely to stay put in my ears) than the "stem" | style buds. The spatial audio thing turned out to be a pointless | novelty that wore off quickly, and isn't even supported on half | of my Apple devices. | | I also get tired of the weird glitches, where my AirPods will | spontaneously decide to drop my connection, and connect to a | different device. With other earbuds, it's a mild annoyance | having to manually tell one device to drop its connection so | another device can connect. But the truth is that I don't have to | do this THAT often, and the unwanted switchovers are far more | frequent and annoying. Plus, there are a ton of bluetooth earbuds | and headphones that accept two or more simultaneous connections, | which eliminates the issue and is better than what AirPods try to | do, honestly. | mcphage wrote: | > a $40 pair of Tozo NC7's that I bought for a backup. The | Tozo's get way more use, to the point where I regret buying the | AirPods | | Thanks for the recommendation... I almost lost one of my | airpods in 18" of snow last week when snowblowing, and I | decided it's not a good idea to wear my airpods when | snowblowing anymore. | geoduck14 wrote: | I have a pair of fancy Bose over-the-ear headphones. They have | the "connect to 2 devices" feature you mentioned. And it | inconvenient. | | It will connect to my cell phone and computer at the same time. | I'll be on a zoom call (computer) and _something_ will make it | decide to disconnect and reconnect from my phone - so I 'll get | a 10 second interruption notifying me of this glitch. | | Also, if someone calls me, I haven't figured out how to force | it to switch to my cell phone. | lucian1900 wrote: | You can pull the power button to switch between devices the | headphones are paired to. | | I've instead found it useful to disable the voice prompts. | The connects/disconnects become a short beep that doesn't | drown out anything else. | StevePerkins wrote: | That doesn't sound like simultaneous-connection support is | inconvenient. It sounds like Bose's buggy implementation of | it is inconvenient. | | Back when I used to lug around over-the-ear headphones, I | mostly used a $50 pair of bluetooth headphones by Taotronics | (a no-name, fly-by-night company that doesn't even seem to | exist in Amazon's catalog now). And they work flawlessly with | two simultaneously connected devices. | Tsiklon wrote: | Taotronics were one of the brands banned from Amazon last | year for inflating user reviews[1]. | | [1] - https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/1/22703276/amazon- | banned-br... | StevePerkins wrote: | Huh. Looks like the company behind my "Taotronics" | headphones are the same people who made the "Vava" USB | hub that I use with my Mac (and which has been more | reliable than Anker's that I've paid twice as much for). | | Stupid. They would have done just fine relying on organic | reviews, but now they have the death penalty. It's like | watching Richard Nixon get Watergated out of office, | because he thought he needed an edge to beat George | freaking McGovern. | elteto wrote: | I have exactly the same problem! I've resorted to manually | disabling Bluetooth on the device I don't want to use... | never had that issue with Airpods. | numpad0 wrote: | AirPods are held on ears similar to how a wine glass should be | held in hand. There is a opposing pair of protrusions in human | ears, between which the stem goes through, and the flexion of | that protrusions works against the force exerted by the bulb | and hold earphones in place. | | I don't understand why Apple went with that as a default; that | part of my ears seems to have evolved so as not to catch | debris, and EarPods-style earphones just comes off as they | should. And it is not that likely I have a million in one ear | leaf genetic subtypes. | lucian1900 wrote: | It does depend on ears, for sure. Most in-ear headphones are | painful for me, including the "dot" ones. Stem ones tend to be | far more comfortable, with the Apple ones the most comfortable. | I've also never had AirPods fall out of my hears even when | exercising. They seem to be made for my ears. | IggleSniggle wrote: | My counter point is that I have my AirPods paired with 4 | different (Apple) devices, and I'm constantly amazed that they | always seem to be connected to "the right one" every single | time. The handoff is seamless and hasn't made a mistake about | guessing which device I want to be driving them in the two | years I've owned them. | post_break wrote: | Too bad the NC7s dont remember which state they are in. You | have to toggle them every time you put them in you ears. | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | It's weird to me how many people are like "yeah but every other | bluetooth is worse". I have Airpod Pros and experienced every one | of these issues and many more on the regular with them, but my | several years old now Bose QC 35II never have any of these | problems, still last like 5 times as long on battery after years | of recharge cycles, interact better with two simultaneously | connected devices, have better signal range before dropping out, | and I can control the damned volume without trying a dozen times | to get Siri to wake the fuck up because airpods have no built-in | volume controls and Siri's voice activation is worse than | terrible. | | The Airpods are set to connect automatically to my macbook when I | wear them AND THEY DON'T. EVER. And then calls on my iPhone will | stupidly decide to connect and route audio to airpods that I'm | not even wearing while they are just sitting on my desk when the | phone was literally moments before using the handset speaker for | a video. Know what bluetooth device does not have these problems? | You guessed it, the one not made by Apple. Like...come on. | | I really want to like airpods, but they're just not good. | dempedempe wrote: | I had my QC 35IIs stolen when I forgot them in a Sixt rental. I | decided to get some Airpods as a replacement as most reviews I | found online said they were comparable. God, I miss my QC | 35IIs... | afterburner wrote: | Meanwhile my $30 versions work great. And look better IMO | BoxOfRain wrote: | That's even more weird given my experience with a pair of Beats | Studio 3 headphones I have which are _de facto_ a brand of | Apple headphones. They 've never given me Bluetooth grief once | in years of very regular use, it's not like they can't do | reliable Bluetooth equipment. | krferriter wrote: | I think part of the problems you describe is the failings of | the bluetooth stack in MacOS, not the Airpods themselves. I | have had bluetooth device issues in MacOS on a brand new | Macbook, and of course MacOS offers no advanced control options | or access to underlying defaults it plugs into device and | connection configurations, and there are forum posts about | issues going back many years with no acknowledgement by Apple | and seemingly no plans for a fix. | | My main problem with Airpods is the physical design, which | simply refuses to stay in my ears at all, rendering them | totally useless, even if I'm just sitting relatively stationary | at a desk. | | My Samsung Galaxy Buds have been doing pretty well, though I | just started having a problem where the left earbud is | extremely quiet. | pjerem wrote: | I have to reassure you, the Windows BT stack is actually a | pile of garbage. And I'm talking about things like the whole | audio system crashing when trying to use my XM4 on any | videoconference software, my Xbox controller randomly | disconnecting for several seconds while in game (I play at a | <1m distance) or my keyboard suddenly disconnecting while I | work. | | At this point I'm starting to believe that even Linux has a | better Bluetooth stack than windows and OS X. | | iOS is okayish but I have random issues with my AirPods. | Generally they just stop being recognized and I have to reset | them and to setup then again. Boring. | smoldesu wrote: | > At this point I'm starting to believe that even Linux has | a better Bluetooth stack than windows and OS X. | | With Pipewire, this seems to have come true in it's | entirety. Connecting multipoint Bluetooth headsets to | multiple Linux devices works astonishingly well, and I | don't think I've ever had a connection drop or encountered | a real "bug" with it. The only annoyance is that if you | have one device playing audio and another starts playing, | it will cut out for a fraction of a second while the | headset negotiates it's connection. Besides that it's | almost scarily flawless. | orhmeh09 wrote: | I have found for years that Linux offers the best Bluetooth | experience. Does Android use their BT stack or do they have | their own? | StaleTortilla wrote: | Agreed on Bose QC 35II being great. I hardly ever have any | issues with them. The only issues I do have with them are when | they connect to my work MacBook Pro. The biggest of these | issues is that the MacBook refuses to let any other device be | the active device. If my Bose QC 35II connect to both my | MacBook and my PC or phone (Android), and I want to listen to | audio from the non-MacBook device, I have to first disconnect | the headphones from the MacBook. But for my PC and phone, I can | be dual connected to those, and as long as I have nothing | playing, I can start playing something on either device and | immediately hear it. At this point I've given up on using the | Bose with the MacBook. | leo150 wrote: | I'm having exactly the same issue. Moreover, when you have | multiple devices and want to switch to a new one, first you | have to guess who hijacked the sound. | chipotle_coyote wrote: | I don't know about "every other Bluetooth," but I certainly | experience _different_ problems with other Bluetooth devices. | :) My regular experiences: | | - The AirPods Pro and AirPods Max generally work well. I've | experienced most of the annoyances the OP lists _occasionally,_ | but not _regularly,_ although the "autoselect the device want | you want" outsmarts itself semi-regularly. (Not quite enough to | make me disable it, but it's close.) I have never attempted to | control the volume of the AirPods Pro using Siri because it | sounds like a bag of hurt. | | - My Bose SoundLink II will immediately _say_ it 's connected | to the last device that it paired with when I turn it on, but | sound won't come out of it. Depending on what seems to be | random chance, either it'll start playing in ~15 seconds, or it | will repeat its "Connected to [Device]" voice cue and _then_ | immediately be available for play, or once in a while it will | put itself back in "I'm not connected!" mode and I will have | to go into Bluetooth settings to manually connect. | | - My Vanatoo desktop speakers have Bluetooth, and once they're | connected to the phone they don't want to let go. I'll have | successfully sent sound to the SoundLink, or the AirPods, or | just the phone's own speaker, and then suddenly the sound will | mysteriously vanish because the Vanatoos have woken up and | grabbed the signal. (This sometimes happens before the Vanatoos | have powered up their own internal amplifiers.) | | - The Bluetooth pairing in my mother's car consistently has the | weirdest behavior: I connect, it starts playing a podcast or | music, and the audio just cuts out every four seconds or so at | a regular cadence. It seems like it might be playing just a | _little_ too fast and there 's a buffering issue. If I | disconnect the Bluetooth and reconnect it, then everything's | fine. But the first connection after the car starts will always | be broken. | | I mean, I know that's all anecdotal. But at least for me, the | AirPods are the least broken Bluetooth audio devices I use. I | get that "it works less frustratingly for many people most of | the time" is not nearly as catchy as "it just works," but until | Bluetooth gets properly sorted out in 2083 or whenever, I guess | I'll live with it. | TylerE wrote: | I have to wonder if it's time to just say screw Bluetooth, | and deploy a new standard that's specially oriented for | audio. | | Requirements aren't crazy. It just needs to support | uncompressed 96/24, full duplex. | chipotle_coyote wrote: | I don't think you need a new standard for that -- UWB | radios, like Apple's already-deployed U1 chip, have the | bandwidth to easily be bandying about 96/24 FLAC/ALAC | files, at the least. (Personally, I'd settle for topping | out at 48/16 lossless ALAC.) | bsder wrote: | Except that requirement _IS_ crazy--when you put all the | other stuff around it. | | Must work at 2.4Ghz--even in the face of 200 WiFi access | points and 3 times that number of devices. | | Must stay in sync to within a millisecond ... even though | there is a large bag of RF absorbing water in between them. | | Should work on a battery smaller than a thumbnail. | | Should process audio but not generate enough heat that you | notice it in your ear. | | I can go on. The engineering requirements are quite severe. | | ... for something that we can do with a 10 cent wire, | ironically. | jonwinstanley wrote: | So true, we take the complexity for granted. It's | actually a really hard problem. | chowells wrote: | You can hear 48kHz tones? Wow. | smoldesu wrote: | I know some people have experimented with WiFi direct for | that, but I'm not really familiar with it's limitations | besides "you have to be hooked up to a router for it to | work". One thing's for certain though, if someone made a | pair of lossless cans that could "find" devices over | arbitrary WiFi networks, I'd probably switch just for the | improvement in latency alone. | Gigachad wrote: | Wifi has an ad-hoc mode which doesn't require a router. | fphhotchips wrote: | Ah yes, the famously well supported and not at all prone | to weird bugs Wifi Ad-hoc mode. | pahomov wrote: | And zero delay, please. I'll take two. | oynqr wrote: | Why waste a bunch of bandwidth on 96 kHz when 44.1 is fine? | [deleted] | tmh88j wrote: | >It's weird to me how many people are like "yeah but every | other bluetooth is worse". I have Airpod Pros and experienced | every one of these issues and many more on the regular with | them, but my several years old now Bose QC 35II never have any | of these problems | | I've also experienced these issues with my airpods, but my | Sennheiser PXC-550's are 10x worse and cost twice as much. | Great audio quality, feels like cheap throw-away walmart junk | in every other regard. I only use them if I'm going to listen | to music and nothing more. | hellomyguys wrote: | Yeah, using my AirPods Max is one of the most frustrating | experiences. In the past week I've had to force reset them so | many times and it almost seems arbitrary when it actually | connects. I can't imagine a non-savvy tech person being able to | easily debug it. | bredren wrote: | With Mac / iOS devices? It should not behave like this. | Consider swapping them out. | hellomyguys wrote: | Yes with iPads and iPhones. It's not an uncommon experience | if you google it. I imagine its a software issue not a | hardware issue too. | r00fus wrote: | Reviewer didn't say which ones he has nor which phone. | | My view of "AirPods" has changed over the years - had them since | the OG launch with my iPhone7. A lot of the gripes make sense | with the older models. Then I upgraded my iPhone to latest, and | got the AirPods3. | | With the v3 I finally feel it's a great product. I turn off the | "automatic connection" BT settings for all but one device | (iPhone) and it works as I expect. The spatial audio is great. | | I tried a non-Apple AirPods equivalent for a while (cheap now, | $30) and really missed the "find my" feature, plus the sizing was | off. | | My favorite new feature is the Find My where you can play | MarcoPolo with your missing AirPod. THAT was much better than | with my OG pods. Of course, the "your AirPods have been left | behind" is often spurious so that needs improvement but better a | false negative than a missed positive. | nfRfqX5n wrote: | a lot of these annoyances can be solved if the author slightly | changed their behavior. I still think AirPods Pro are some of the | best new tech of the last 5 years | baby wrote: | For the pros, I don't understand how anyone can use these air | tips, they never stay in my ears :( | | also no more volume and previous/next buttons :/ | drewg123 wrote: | For me, the most annoying "feature" of airpods vs other BT audio | was that Siri started announcing incoming calls, and reading the | contact name in full, or the full phone number, both of which | take forever. I finally found a recipe to shut that off. | | I don't recall siri being this invasive with my Bose BT | headphones. I wonder why airpods got this special (annoying to | me, likely wonderful to others) treatment. | Nextgrid wrote: | > I don't recall siri being this invasive with my Bose BT | headphones | | I think it's just because Apple is intentionally gatekeeping | the feature to AirPods even though it can technically work with | any headphones, so in this case your Bose headphones were | spared the annoyance because of Apple's anti-competitive | practices, whereas AirPods have it on by default. Fortunately | it's easy to disable in Settings -> Phone -> Announce calls. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-26 23:00 UTC)