[HN Gopher] Who Got It Right: Orwell or Huxley? ___________________________________________________________________ Who Got It Right: Orwell or Huxley? Author : steelstraw Score : 41 points Date : 2022-01-27 21:34 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.pairagraph.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.pairagraph.com) | umvi wrote: | Depends on the country. | | China - Orwell | | USA/EU - Huxley | wrnr wrote: | kodah wrote: | If you read Orwell's essays I don't think he paints the picture | as clearly as 1984 does. | | Some papers with these themes off the top of my head: | | - Reflections on Gandhi | | - Politics and the English Language | | - My Country Right or Left | cjbgkagh wrote: | Replying here because GP is flagged.... I do not agree with | the GP opinion but I think people should be allowed to | express 'bad' opinions. | wrnr wrote: | No there should be no place for bad opinions, otherwise | people can LARP their favourite dystopian fiction. | kodah wrote: | I wasn't saying I agree with them either, just pointing out | Orwell wasn't telling stories about "good and bad" in the | way 1984 was written. A lot of his essays actually show | there's a lot of grey, much less shades of it. | [deleted] | spaetzleesser wrote: | I hate these either/or questions. A lot of societies have aspects | of both. North Korea probably leans toward Orwell but the rest of | the world more Huxley at the moment. But we shouldn't create | these dichotomies. Left vs right, socialism vs capitalism and so | on. They stifle any reasonable discussion right before it can | even begin. I guess that's the purpose of offering only extreme | alternatives. | unixhero wrote: | Aldous wrote a utopia. | | Orwell wrote a dystopia. | [deleted] | madrox wrote: | A recent thread went around twitter discussing the need for | artificial wombs to address the inequality between men and women. | Huxley is the first place my mind went. | | https://twitter.com/molly0xfff/status/1483831201823703041?s=... | AnimalMuppet wrote: | Orwell is more oppression that is done to us. Huxley is more | oppression that we go along with doing to ourselves. So far, it's | more Huxley. | nottorp wrote: | Both, depending on country/time period. | | I've lived in Orwell's country (communist dictatorship) when I | was young, now I live in Brave New World. | HarryHirsch wrote: | Brave New World had the Falklands. Where are the Falklands? | lordnacho wrote: | Elements of both exist in the modern world, but Huxley's is | easier to overlook. Authorities need people to mostly not react | to intolerable things that are happening, and it's best if you do | it from placating people with drugs/toys/pacifiers rather than | the whip, because people who are pacified will pressure other | people into not rocking the boat, whereas people who are being | whipped will complain about it to their friends and try to build | up a resistance movement. | | Of course when you do go for the whip, you want to newspeak it | into something else, so that also works, in small doses. Your | problem occurs if it escalates, then you can't hold it down with | PR anymore. | | So 1984 is metastable and such societies did in fact boil over. | BNW is stable and invisible to a lot of people, though I suspect | there is some failure mode we have yet to see. Maybe there's a | line of thought where people just get sick of every damn thing | being massaged to death by PR people, and they do something about | it. | Jansen312 wrote: | 1984 got it more correct. Take sometime to read or watch | current China related stuff. It makes whatever we think | oppressions done by western countries look pedantic. Huxley | birth control might also play out in China if birth rate there | still dropping way below what the state wants of 3 at the | moment. Personally I feel, if the world was dominated by | mainland Chinese and their influences or direct supremacy in | some kind of marvel multiverse, then Huxley-Orwell fictions | might be "unfictionized" there. | pram wrote: | I've always thought the achilles heel of Oceania's government | was the economy. Pretty much the one thing they couldn't really | place into their 'subjective reality' philosophical framework. | | The way information passed through the Outer Party technicians | was extremely compartmentalized. It was a command economy, did | anyone actually know how things were going? The statistics were | basically all lies. Eventually the gin and cigarettes would | stop flowing. | ashtonkem wrote: | Related, there are stories of the USSR turning its own spy | satellites on itself to estimate correct crop yields because | of the culture of lying and exaggeration internally. | Basically nobody at the top really knew what was going on, | because everyone below them constantly lied to avoid getting | in trouble. | TheCoelacanth wrote: | Both. They are fictional explorations of human nature. Not | prophecies about what the future will actually look like. | mjfl wrote: | Huxley seems to be more right in the long term, since Orwellian | oppression is very visible, people work to fix it and eventually | do. Not so for Huxly-an dystopia. | NikolaeVarius wrote: | > Orwellian oppression is very visible | | 1984 makes a fairly strong point that this is not true. | | The proles do not conceive of the fact that they are oppressed. | Only the outer party can even think this, and at best its a | muted response. Newspeak is about making it impossible to see | or conceptualize oppression or injustice. | WillPostForFood wrote: | _Orwellian oppression is very visible, people work to fix it | and eventually do._ | | At least in 1984, oppression wins. It is a very bleak ending. | colecut wrote: | Nearly everyone carries an internet connected camera microphone | tracking device everywhere. | Hnaomyiph wrote: | Does a camera, microphone and tracking device detect a slowly | boiled frog? | time_to_smile wrote: | The trouble is I'm perfectly fine with the Huxlian distopia. | Ship me off to an island of intellectual dissidents and give me | some good drugs, I'm down for that world. | | Kafka is the one who really got it right. I've never felt a | more realistic depiction of my life than _The Trial_. | cjbgkagh wrote: | I'd be down for 60 years of good health, I think of the | amount of work that I could do. I think the problem is that | they have to keep throwing the work away and the | pointlessness of it all would kill me. | jameskilton wrote: | Yes. | scandox wrote: | My experience is that 1984 is much more re-readable. That doesn't | necessarily mean anything, except that perhaps Orwell created a | world that is more mentally inhabitable despite its grim nature. | The little room above the shop is a respite we can all dream of. | | There's nothing like that in Brave New World, though I think it's | the wiser book. | 5cott0 wrote: | Neither because they both plagiarized Yevgeny Zamyatin. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel) | pharmakom wrote: | Plagiarised is totally the wrong word here. Besides, We is | satirical so quite different in tone. I greatly enjoyed all | three novels though, and encourage people to read them all :) | cookie_monsta wrote: | Meaning that Zamyatin got it wrong, too? | uvdn7 wrote: | They are not mutually exclusive? If you look at China, both are | sort of happening at the same place in the same place. | scoofy wrote: | The books are using "the future" to describe their present times. | nix23 wrote: | Both, it's the mix that makes the perfect society, but 1984 is | the better book ;) | after_care wrote: | I don't really see the either/or situation here. It seems like | two ways in which states can control citizens, and with actors in | the modern world taking lessons from both mixed with other | sources. | js2 wrote: | Neither. The dystopia I fear is Terry Gilliam's _Brazil_ , though | on some days, I think we're headed toward _Idiocracy_. | cjbgkagh wrote: | Orwell vs Huxley seems to be the lens of how people react to what | is done to them. I'm more interested in why those in power do | those things in the first place. The article points to the | students as if they have power, I don't think they do, they're | trapped in a system and reacting to it as pretty much any young | human would do in the same position. | | Possibly my favorite example of the powerful impressing a way of | life on a huge number of people is the diplomatic sealed train | the Germans used to send Lenin from Switzerland to Russia. i.e. | the Russian Revolution was an intentional act done to it by | cynical Germans who correctly expected the outcome would help | them in the war. And the rest is history. | NikolaeVarius wrote: | > i.e. the Russian Revolution was an intentional act done to it | by cynical Germans who correctly expected the outcome would | help them in the war. | | Claiming that Germany caused the Russian Revolution via the | sole act of sending him back to Russia is not true. | | While it is true that Lenin ultimately led the Bolsheviks to | power, the reason Germany even thought about sending Lenin back | was that Russia was already on the brink of collapse due to | reasons a mile long and Germany was throwing shit against the | wall to hasten Russian collapse. | | Claiming a revolution of an entire country was caused by a | single person is a bit much. | pydry wrote: | Power is a hell of a drug. | ashtonkem wrote: | Sending Lenin to Russia wasn't about causing a revolution, that | had actually already happened, but it was about trying to | affect who would win the following fight for power. | madrox wrote: | After reading Dune and also being an engineering leader, I've | come to view power as multivariate. In some ways you have less | power when you're in charge. To go with your example, many | other countries didn't see a choice in getting involved in WW1. | cjbgkagh wrote: | One of my takeaways from 1984 is that those who are | supposedly in charge are slaves to a self perpetuating | emergent behavior. It often feels like it is never a choice. | How much of politics is decided by Henry Kissinger and his | disciples (e.g. Klaus Schwab - Davos) carrying on the | tradition of realpolitik. | spaetzleesser wrote: | "those who are supposedly in charge are slaves to a self | perpetuating emergent behavior" | | That describes most of society and for sure a lot of | companies. A lot of people realize that something is not | right but they still stay confined within that framework. | pphysch wrote: | Neither because they're both fiction books marketed towards a | popular audience for their entertainment. They are not | substitutes for concrete analysis of historical facts. | | "Who got it right, J.R.R. Tolkien or J.K. Rowling?" | rapnie wrote: | Well, fiction with such clear warnings in them are more like | parables. | pphysch wrote: | Neither of these fictional novels are succinct nor simple, | like a parable. | maurits wrote: | Although I understand its been critiqued, I always liked the | visual depiction of "amusing ourselves to death" from Postman | [1], by McMillen [2] | | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death | | [2]: https://biblioklept.org/2013/06/08/huxley-vs-orwell-the- | webc... | voidfunc wrote: | Am I the only one who read Brave New World and thought "That | doesn't seem all that bad?" | TheDudeMan wrote: | I'm here to collect my free sex and drugs. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-27 23:00 UTC)