[HN Gopher] Masterclass on mathematical thinking ___________________________________________________________________ Masterclass on mathematical thinking Author : harmonicseq Score : 37 points Date : 2022-01-27 22:17 UTC (42 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (terrytao.wordpress.com) (TXT) w3m dump (terrytao.wordpress.com) | blinkingled wrote: | Requires subscription to Masterclass to view the series. Not much | info in the linked post - | https://www.masterclass.com/classes/terence-tao-teaches-math... | paulpauper wrote: | there is a video about it. It's probably one of those things | where it "teaches you how to think". | forgotmyoldacc wrote: | Comment section has some more information on why the course was | made. | paulpauper wrote: | probably helps also to have a 1 in 100 million IQ too, but sounds | like fun anyway. I am not sure how some of thee masterclasses are | useful. Like the one by the astronaut . I don't plan on going | into space anytime soon. Maybe Elon Musk would enjoy that one. No | amount of videos will make even a typical PhD in math even as | close to as good as him. It's 90% genes , 10% other factors. | klyrs wrote: | > It's 90% genes , 10% other factors. | | Do you have evidence to support these numbers, or the more | general claim of genetic supremacy? | NikolaeVarius wrote: | Genes must have something to do with it. Take the case of | Srinivasa Ramanujan | | No formal training in math. Made insane contributions to | mathematics including solving "unsolvable" problems. | | > A child prodigy by age 11, he had exhausted the | mathematical knowledge of two college students who were | lodgers at his home. He was later lent a book written by S. | L. Loney on advanced trigonometry.[18][19] He mastered this | by the age of 13 while discovering sophisticated theorems on | his own. By 14, he received merit certificates and academic | awards that continued throughout his school career, and he | assisted the school in the logistics of assigning its 1,200 | students (each with differing needs) to its approximately 35 | teachers.[14]: 27 He completed mathematical exams in half the | allotted time, and showed a familiarity with geometry and | infinite series. Ramanujan was shown how to solve cubic | equations in 1902; he developed his own method to solve the | quartic. In the following year, he tried to solve the | quintic, not knowing that it could not be solved by radicals. | | If there was a method of raising kids like this | "scientifically" , I bet a good portion of the worlds GDP | would be put into this field of research | paulpauper wrote: | People will delay a dental procedure but they will not | delay making their kids #1. | paulpauper wrote: | He was a demonstrating adult level math ability even at the | age of 5. Also, he was genius level at other subjects too. | How would it not be genetic. Think of how hard parents push | their kids in today's super-competitive economy and high- | stakes higher ed system, how many turn out even close to as | talented as him? | uoaei wrote: | Is it really common opinion that TT is smart because of his | genes? I would think having a helpful and engaged math-fluent | father and lots of encouragement from an early age has way more | to do with it. You can't seriously believe that an introduction | into mathematical thinking from an early age and close advision | from math-fluent parents is only 10% of the reason that TT is | where he is today. | umvi wrote: | From the wiki: | | > Tao exhibited extraordinary mathematical abilities from an | early age, attending university-level mathematics courses at | the age of 9. He is one of only two children in the history | of the Johns Hopkins' Study of Exceptional Talent program to | have achieved a score of 700 or greater on the SAT math | section while just eight years old; Tao scored a 760 | | I think genetics have more to do with this level of | achievement than encouragement from an engaged father. Tao | has 2 brothers - why aren't they mathematical supergeniuses | too? Either he was born with a brain that has extraordinary | analytical ability, or he was born with an insane work ethic | not commonly associated with young kids. But even then, are | there reports of him having to work super hard to understand | things? If you can do advanced algebra at age 5, I'd say your | brain is something extraordinary. Whether the underlying | reason for that extraordinary brain is due to genes or some | other trigger, it likely was not mainly due to an | "encouraging father", IMO. | drexlspivey wrote: | > Tao has 2 brothers - why aren't they mathematical | supergeniuses too? | | The previous sentence from the one you quoted states that | | "Tao also has two brothers, who are living in Australia. | Both formerly represented the country at the International | Mathematical Olympiad" | paulpauper wrote: | Regarding his brothers, imagine if IQ is like a bunch of | switches. TT was born with all his switches flipped 'on' | out of some maximum. His brothers were born with most of | them flipped on, as were his parents. Having high IQ | parents increases the odds of more switches being flipped | on, but having all of them flipped is still innate. | [deleted] | paulpauper wrote: | I don't think you understand the difference between being | good at math and being at his level. Good parents can make | the difference between being good at math or mediocre at | math, but not knowing higher level concepts at the age of 15 | or so . Or PhD at 22 or something. There are thousands of | professors in the US even in math, how many produce super | genius math kids with similar ability? Two 120-IQ parents a | more more likely to produce a 110 IQ kids than someone with a | 170+ IQ like TT; that is something else. | michaelhah wrote: | Probably getting to his level is highly genetically dependent | but that's not what watching a Masterclass vid is about. | Probably really interesting but I would likely forget to cancel | and i am planning on living forever so I'd end up paying an | infinite amount of money for this. | paulpauper wrote: | then what is it about then? listening to someone talk about | their job? Can't you do that for free on YouTube? | mindcrime wrote: | I've never seriously considered subscribing to Masterclass, but | this has gotten the gears turning in my head a little. So I'm | curious: does anyone here subscribe, and could you comment on | whether or not you feel like it's worthwhile, given the available | content? | Graffur wrote: | My first reaction to this blog post was kind of negative because | Master Class is not free. I watched the teaser video and it's | actually pretty inspiring. As someone who has done undergraduate | Computer Science level Math, but completely forgotten most things | about Math except for simple Algebra, I am going to try this. | | The cost is EUR16/month which is cheaper than Netflix. I just | cancelled my Spotify recently so this is affordable for me right | now. | | EDIT: The problem I see with Master Class as a subcription | service is... if you watch Master classes on everything you are | getting a broad education rather than a deep dive. I guess it's | more for entertainment though. | forgotmyoldacc wrote: | Seems like motivation porn more than education. Not that | there's anything wrong with that, just knowing which one is | which is useful. | paulpauper wrote: | You are not going to go from high school math to graduate level | competency with this course, obviously. | supernova87a wrote: | Watching the trailer, makes me think that people who may enjoy | this series will also enjoy a book called "Aha" by Martin Gardner | (from probably 40 years ago)[0]. | | It has a lot of amusingly illustrated insight problems that show | you how thinking about a problem different simplifies answers a | lot. It's probably aimed at young teens, but in fact the lessons | there are some that even many adults probably have not come | across before. | | [0] search your favorite, ahem, LIBrary GENeric source of books | to find it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-01-27 23:00 UTC)