[HN Gopher] Don't forget Microsoft
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Don't forget Microsoft
        
       Author : SamvitJ
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2022-01-30 21:16 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (luttig.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (luttig.substack.com)
        
       | foobarian wrote:
       | Can Microsoft please make a Windows phone after all? Both Apple
       | and Android ecosystems and hardware together are terrible in
       | various ways and don't work well with Windows.
        
         | rr808 wrote:
         | Right now due to my lack of self control a lack of apps is a
         | bonus. I just need a maps, camera, uber that's about it.
        
         | rafale wrote:
         | They did. It was called Windows Phone... It came out too late,
         | offered too little.
        
           | drunkpotato wrote:
           | It was pretty good. Seemed better than Android at the time.
           | I'm not sure why Microsoft didn't put as much oomph into it
           | as they did for, say, the Xbox, but if they had it might be a
           | major player now.
        
             | qbasic_forever wrote:
             | I had a HTC windows phone and it was not good in my
             | experience. The app store was non-existent, the OS forced
             | you into using its own social media experiences which were
             | half implemented and janky vs. native apps, and the web
             | browser was slow and clunky for the era (2010s). The home
             | screen was enormously painful with all kinds of different
             | sized icons strewn about and blinking, changing, etc.
             | randomly--I could never find anything in the same place.
             | 
             | The only good thing I could say is that the settings were
             | much simpler and easier to navigate than apple or android
             | phones at the time. But that was really more because there
             | was far less you could change or do in windows phones.
             | 
             | As far as effort put into it, Microsoft spent years pouring
             | money and resources into trying to grow their phone
             | platform. Remember they basically invented modern
             | smartphones with Windows mobile phones--I was using 'real'
             | web browsers on my windows mobile 5 phone as far back as
             | 2006, years and years before the iPhone came out. They
             | spent billions buying companies like Nokia, trying to get
             | more developers on their platform, etc. There were at least
             | two or three complete restarts to the whole platform. There
             | were internal competitors even from the Xbox/game division
             | (remember the Kin?). It just churned and churned and
             | churned despite all resources and money thrown at it--all
             | of it wasted in the end.
        
         | colmvp wrote:
         | How are they terrible?
         | 
         | Having used cellphones since the 90s, my experiences with
         | Android/Apple phones have been nothing short of remarkable and
         | to be frank, life changing in terms of day-to-day utility.
        
         | salil999 wrote:
         | I'm surprised you say the Apple ecosystem is terrible. It's
         | arguably the best, most complete and integrated ecosystem out
         | there currently.
         | 
         | Of course it's not going to work well with Windows. Apple wants
         | you to buy a Mac.
        
           | smoldesu wrote:
           | It's hard to call the iPhone complete when it makes egregious
           | concessions in it's capabilities in the name of "safety"
           | (which turns out to be a moot-point anyways, as sufficently
           | funded state actors have proven to us over the past few
           | months).
        
             | jolux wrote:
             | Security is not moot just because state actors can break
             | it, that's basically expected.
        
       | rafale wrote:
       | "There's a horse in Redmond that always suits up and always runs,
       | and will keep running." - Tim "Apple" Cook
        
         | ape4 wrote:
         | Microsoft needs a CEO with "Microsoft" as his/her middle name.
        
       | zarriak wrote:
       | Great article but please use GAFAM not FAAMG or FAMGA
        
       | quickthrower2 wrote:
       | Hindsight is 20x20, but Microsoft share price has increased about
       | 5 fold in 5 years, while only doubling the 5 years before that.
       | It had to play a bit of catch up with other FAANG type companies.
        
       | blip54321 wrote:
       | I feel like the elephant in the room is culture.
       | 
       | * Facebook seems to be a bunch of smart people working on pet
       | projects. Monopoly profits drive a political empire where people
       | at the top think up something random, and it gets built.
       | 
       | * Google has customer contempt. They started with brilliant
       | people who were used to being smarter than everyone else. They
       | also started in algorithm-driven markets like search and ad-
       | words, where everything was statistical and individuals didn't
       | matter. They've lost the smarts and the ethics, and they're in a
       | bit of a hole. I think they've reached the end of the growth
       | line.
       | 
       | * I know nothing about Apple. Too secretive.
       | 
       | * Microsoft has a bunch of cut-throat teams, competing with each
       | other. Their technology is middling. However, they're the only
       | one of the bunch you'd want to partner with for B2B.
       | 
       | * ... except for Amazon, which is hyper-customer-focused, and has
       | a track record of successful forward-looking projects. AWS has
       | been rock solid. On the other hand, I'd never want to work there;
       | they treat employees like crap. But it somehow works out for
       | them.
        
       | ourmandave wrote:
       | _Microsoft may have too many internal competing interests to
       | recognize that it has become the Azure company, but it should be
       | clear by the late 2020s._
       | 
       | Any divisions that yell "Developers!" at events already know
       | this. The rest are probably aware.
       | 
       | My only problem is how everything is going to subscription based
       | pricing and requires a cloud account.
        
       | powera wrote:
       | It's somewhat surprising that Oracle isn't even mentioned in the
       | article.
        
       | logshipper wrote:
       | This is a good and thorough article. The author got down to brass
       | tacks pretty quickly and brings up interesting hypothesis about
       | $MSFT.
       | 
       | That said, I do have one gripe:
       | 
       | > To oversimplify Notion to its demographics, it is Office 365
       | for people below age 35.
       | 
       | I recognize this is an oversimplification, but even so, it seems
       | like a stretch. Notion is a decent product, and I have used it
       | for a few small-scale team projects in uni (mainly for Kanban-
       | related stuff) - but to call it a replacement for O365 is an
       | exaggeration at best.
       | 
       | Yes, you can have pretty, nested documents in Notion and that's
       | great, but a tabular database in Notion is by no means a
       | replacement for Excel or even Google Sheets. The velocity that is
       | afforded by Excel in terms of formulas is unmatched and there's a
       | reason it has yet to be unseated as the kingpin of modern
       | finance.
       | 
       | Most young people I know use a combination of Discord + Google
       | Suite to collaborate. I am aware this is slightly anecdotal, but
       | I am also having a hard time imagining myself as a founder and
       | then asking my CFO to use Notion to prepare investor pitches.
       | 
       | Source: Am 23 :)
        
       | reilly3000 wrote:
       | I think this is a really solid analysis and strategy. I want to
       | briefly expound on the data side which is a huge growth area:
       | mSFT would do well to SHOW the rank and file analyst and
       | developer machine learning in context of their daily work, not
       | TELL CEOs about its transformational possibilities. They own the
       | world's most popular surface for interacting with data. Why not
       | make Azure's machine learning be keystrokes away? Give away
       | credits and training, suggest use cases, provide actual value.
       | Sell a $0.000000000001/unit cost that makes it safe for anyone to
       | try in their daily work. It doesn't need to do much, some cool
       | forecasting, predicting the value of the next cell inline, etc
       | would be delightful. I'm a but disconnected from their ecosystem
       | at this point but I see a window where the can captivate the long
       | tail with pragmatic ML and assert their centrality for the coming
       | decades.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-30 23:00 UTC)