[HN Gopher] New material that can absorb and release enormous am... ___________________________________________________________________ New material that can absorb and release enormous amounts of energy Author : prostoalex Score : 83 points Date : 2022-02-02 18:53 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (phys.org) (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org) | marto1 wrote: | Can it be used for batteries ? I know large scale mechanical | batteries are a very efficient way of storing energy, but no idea | about the state of small scale ones. | fghorow wrote: | Personally, I want a wind-up EV! ;-) | capableweb wrote: | Without reference, it's hard to know exactly what you mean with | large scale vs small scale, but I do know a person who has a | pool of water high up on their property, which they let run to | the bottom pool when they want cheap energy when prices are | high and pump it up again when prices are cheap but they have | no need for it currently. I'd say that's relatively small | scale. | stavros wrote: | That's a good energy storage mechanism, but do you know what | the efficiency is? Also, how much energy could you | practically store there? | mwcremer wrote: | Bigger scale: | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helms_Pumped_Storage_Plant | davedx wrote: | No numbers whatsoever. Kind of a useless article | pmayrgundter wrote: | Source pub, with some videos of the loading response: | | https://www.pnas.org/content/119/1/e2118161119 | [deleted] | mrfusion wrote: | Can it be used for shock absorbers or seat belts? | vimax wrote: | Reading the paper my first thought was, could this be scaled up | for a a tactile touch screen display? | beambot wrote: | Just to be clear: This appears to be mechanical storage (i.e. | Hooke's Law) rather than _electrical_ storage. They 're embedding | magnets into elastomers to create a programable "metamaterial" | that has controlled non-linearities in elastic response. | mrkstu wrote: | Intersting material. | | More interesting to me is the Army being willing to sponsor | research simultaneously with a Chinese institution... | sybercecurity wrote: | Often it is done simply to get reports. The research is likely | going to happen anyway in a lot of these areas. Signing a deal | to give some money commits the researchers to give reports used | to monitor the program. | ISL wrote: | I was surprised to see that, too. It is a rare combination, | perhaps a hopeful one if there are problems that funding | agencies in both countries see as important-enough to fund | alongside their frequently-presumed competitor. | | However, a closer read suggests that the author did the work at | UMass Amherst, then took a professorship in Shenzhen. | henryw wrote: | Can this be made into bulletproof clothing that looks like normal | clothes? That would be cool | petermcneeley wrote: | Joules per Kg or gtfo. | stevespang wrote: | natnatenathan wrote: | I was hoping it would be called Astrophage... | | ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Hail_Mary | Nition wrote: | Not quite the same, but got me thinking: Could we theoretically | power and refuel car in the following way: | | - Take a cube of X elastic material and squish it really dense | with a big machine. | | - Power the car via the pressure of the material trying to | expand. | | - Once it's nearly depleted (fully expanded), take it to another | squishing station. | | I imagine you couldn't store anywhere _near_ enough power that | way today, but then that 's also the kind of problem the linked | material is trying to solve, right? | hrez wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_car | jiggawatts wrote: | Compressed air energy storage is already a thing! | | The energy stored is limited by the tensile strength of the | container. The best capacity for a unit weight is from | laminated carbon fibre tanks, but this still doesn't even | approach the energy density of ordinary hydrocarbon fuels. | | You'll find that there's lots of interesting ways to store | energy -- like flywheels or chemical cells -- but one way or | another they're all inherently limited by _chemical bond | strengths_. | | Fundamentally all energy storage is some sort of stored | "tension" in chemical bonds that can be released to do useful | work. | | The reason fuels are so good is that this release needs a | second component (oxygen) that is kept separated. This makes | high energy densities safe. | | No separation -- like with compressed gas -- means that the | energy storage is a bomb waiting to go off. It would be too | dangerous to use. | Nition wrote: | Thanks, yeah that makes complete sense. Plus I would imagine | the more energy density you need, the heavier your enclosure | has to be, always partially negating the benefit! | sidpatil wrote: | The actual paper: https://www.pnas.org/content/119/1/e2118161119 | halpert wrote: | It would be great if this material could help with brain damage | in contact sports by making helmets better. | abeppu wrote: | That's a very specific application. | | Isn't there a bound on the efficacy of a helmet based on its | size / thickness? I.e. your head's initial velocity and the | thickness of the helmet constrain the distance over which your | head's velocity must drop to zero, so there's some minimum | force that must be applied to your head no matter what the | helmet's material is? | kbelder wrote: | Conclusion: The helmets must be bigger, much bigger. | | I don't know their current thickness; maybe 2 cm? If we | expand that to a cushioned 10-20cm all the way around their | head, the force would be reduced by a factor of five to ten. | I'd imagine they could head-butt all day long without damage, | and football games would be much more entertaining. | MarcoZavala wrote: | [deleted] | eointierney wrote: | Helmets have an interesting correlation with concussion. They | can help a lot in cycling, hurling, and f1, but can encourage | reckless collision seeking in american football for example. | Contact sports are intrinsically dangerous and introducing | protection from one type of damage can allow increase in other | damage forms. | | Avoid collisions | | I reckon rugby must change the most, which is a real shame | because rugby at the highest level is amazing | | Though ice hockey is pretty daft | politician wrote: | I'm surprised they call it a metamaterial when the features are | on the order of millimeters. | MengerSponge wrote: | The length scale of a metamaterials' features should be | complementary to the length scale the metamaterial is acting | on. | | Kind of squirrely, and I tried really hard to phrase that so it | isn't a tautology. But if you're dealing with radio waves, your | metamaterial can have _huge_ (meter-scale) features. If you 're | dealing with visible light, your feature size is on the | hundreds of nanometer scale. | | Thin films have a characteristic bending length: https://journa | ls.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11..., and this | determines the size of features you should pattern to exploit | that bending/folding interaction. | jchanimal wrote: | I'd argue that some of the most interesting metamaterials are | macroscale. Like radio telescope arrays or the dimples on a | golf-ball. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-02 23:00 UTC)