[HN Gopher] The Stacks Project, a new model for organizing and v... ___________________________________________________________________ The Stacks Project, a new model for organizing and visualizing mathematics Author : mathgenius Score : 57 points Date : 2022-02-05 15:58 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (news.columbia.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (news.columbia.edu) | dang wrote: | Related from 2013: https://mathbabe.org/2013/07/30/the-stacks- | project-gets-ever... | | (via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11054838, but nothing | else there) | mjfl wrote: | How much of this math is deep work and how much of it is it the | conjuring of obscure objects that haven't had much study and | proving trivial things about them? | ogogmad wrote: | I think Deligne's Theorem is a poster child for the power of | Modern Algebraic Geometry. Andrew Wiles's proof of Fermat's | Last Theorem might also be relevant. | | Generally speaking, studying what the solution sets of | polynomial equations is "like" is quite fundamental to a lot of | mathematics. Doing this in a "deep" way can lead to a | reimagining of much of modern mathematics: | https://rawgit.com/iblech/internal-methods/master/notes.pdf | | [edit] | | For instance, lots of people use a straightforward | generalisation of number systems called rings. But ring theory | is quite abstract. Modern Algebraic Geometry shows that at | least in the case of commutative rings, these are merely spaces | of functions on a space called a ring's spectrum. You can | visualise a ring's spectrum, unlike the ring itself. Many | properties of a ring are just properties of its spectrum. This | seems like a significant conceptual leap in the understanding | of things that were studied since the 1800s without much | geometric understanding. | | Oh yeah, and I'm not an algebraic geometer. | foxes wrote: | Algebraic geometry has many deep and powerful ideas. It started | out by looking at the space described by the zeros of a | polynomial, eg | | y^2 - x^3 - x = 0, x^2+y^2+1=0 | | But actually you do not need to talk about the underlying space | directly. If you want to talk about a space, all you actually | need to think about are the possible functions on the space. If | you want to talk about geometry, you only need the algebra of | functions on that space, so in the example just the polynomials | themselves, rather than having to say explicitly solve it for | the points. You can use this big idea in a lot of other areas | of mathematics and physics. | hoten wrote: | It's very difficult to navigate this on mobile. | ruined wrote: | wikipedia is the wiki encyclopedia hosted and managed by the | wikimedia foundation. | | this article appears to be about a different and completely | distinct wiki project. | ogogmad wrote: | It's a bit like a Wiki, except with more centralised | editorialship. Confusing title indeed. | gryn wrote: | it's used in the sense of 'a wiki project which tries to act | like an encyclopedia' unlike for example the wiki wiki web. a | similar kind of wiki is scholarpedia.org. | | the emphasis is on the encyclopedia part. | Someone wrote: | I think HN's 'smart' code to remove clickbait fragments from | titles didn't help here. The page's full title is | | _This Wikipedia of Algebraic Geometry Will Forever Be | Incomplete. That's the Point._ | | That _"This"_ , IMO, makes it clear that they use Wikipedia in | a genericized way | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_trademark) | ogogmad wrote: | To what extent is this knowledge reducible to a form that someone | can learn it quickly and get something done with it? Algebraic | Geometry is just one field of mathematics, no? | | Related question: How do you use this resource? | | [edit] To make it clear: It's a wonderful thing that this exists. | WoahNoun wrote: | Modern Algebraic Geometry is a field that encompasses and | somewhat unifies so many different areas of mathematics that it | is extremely difficult to distill down quickly. So it really | depends on what your currently mathematical background is. If | you only know some Abstract Algebra (ring and field theory in | particular) and Topology at the undergrad level, it will take a | long-time for you to contribute to research mathematics, but | you could probably get a feel for the subject after a couple | years (shorter if our a graduate student focusing on it full- | time). If you don't know anything about those two subjects, | it's a very long slog. If you know differential geometry, | category theory, complex geometry in addition to the above, you | could probably pick it up relatively quickly. | | The definitions and machinery make sense if you have enough | background, but the why and how we got here is often very | unclear. | | If you don't care about schemes, stacks and current modern | viewpoint of Algebraic Geometry, it's not hard to get a decent | understanding of algebraic varieties which are the original | motivation in the field. An undergrad book on the subject | Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms by Cox, Little, and O'Shea | does a great job of introducing the subject. And has a really | cool project on calculating Groebner bases for polynomial | equations in sin and cosine to define the configuration space | of different types of robotic arms. | ogogmad wrote: | I'm trying to learn more modern algebra (including algebraic | geometry). The modern stuff is of interest to me, but it | feels overwhelming. | | I get that affine schemes are somehow the "geometric" dual of | a commutative ring. A motivating example is Spec(R[X,Y]/(X^2 | + Y^2 - 1)), which is simple enough as a ring (if you remove | the "Spec"), but as an affine scheme it is a circle. The | slash is almost acting like a subset formation operation. I | know enough category theory to see that the reason why the | slash is acting that way is because equalisers are the dual | construction to coequalisers; the slash (ring quotienting) is | a coequaliser, and in the category of affine schemes it | becomes an equaliser, and equalisers on "spaces" are supposed | to form subsets somehow. Another example is the ring | R[X]/(X^2), sometimes called the dual numbers, whose affine | scheme (or Spec) is a lot like an infinitely small line | segment. The fact that the affine scheme behaves like an | infinitely small region of space is dual to the algebraic | fact that the dual numbers are a _local_ ring. | | Finally, I have a vague understanding that a scheme is the | result of gluing some affine schemes together. Sheaf stuff is | involved. | | Anyway, the above summarises my understanding of schemes. I | don't know any differential geometry as such. I rely a lot on | naive, and sometimes not wholly rigorous intuition. I have no | idea how you compute with this, especially given how | elaborate the definitions are. | | [edit] | | I'm hoping this might present a shortcut for someone like me: | https://www.ingo-blechschmidt.eu/research.html It's | especially promising because the computations look more | familiar to me. | ABeeSea wrote: | The dual numbers, in my opinion, are a lot easier to | understand with some background in differential geometry. | In differential geometry, if I_x is the ideal of smooth | functions vanishing at the point x in the ring of smooth | functions, then I_x / I_x^2 is a real vector space called | the cotangent space (these elements are given the | suggestive dx moniker) and dual of this vector space is the | space of tangent vectors at this point. Another way to | think about R[X,Y]/(X^2) dropping all the non-linear terms | for X to create a flat (co)tangent space. | | Also the original motivation for sheaves was about creating | a way to deal with multi-valued complex function. The | complex log function is multi-valued so in intro complex | analysis it's studied locally by choosing a branch of the | range where it's singular valued. Thus it's impossible to | "do differential geometry" by talking about a global ring | of analytic functions. But you can talk about the "local | ring of analytic functions" at a point and specific branch | and glue these locally ringed spaces together to get global | insight. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-05 23:00 UTC)