[HN Gopher] Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations ___________________________________________________________________ Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations Author : dzink Score : 200 points Date : 2022-02-08 16:59 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (nerdlegame.com) (TXT) w3m dump (nerdlegame.com) | jdorsey1 wrote: | got it at the third attempt. | MaxMoney wrote: | izzydata wrote: | It looks like they updated it because I used to be able to do | 1+-/*23= and it would accept it because it couldn't compute it as | incorrect. | compsciphd wrote: | I found its 2 easy. my first attempt is always 23+45=68. at that | point i covered most of the possible symbols. | pierrebai wrote: | I get the same feeling as everyone. There is no point in the game | because even a single digit wrong is no clue at all. In my 1st | and only attempt, I entered 1 + 2+ 8 = 11 and both pluses, the 2 | the 1 and the 8 were right, with only the 2 in the wrong | position. And yet that gave zero clue to what the other number | was... and it turned out to be another 8, which made finding the | solution really luck-based. | nextstep wrote: | Ha! I played the exact same first game! | | https://pasteboard.co/NYP4YfnNj0kk.jpg | FabHK wrote: | ? As in Worldle itself (except in hard mode), you don't need | to match what you've deduced already . So, your second line | could have been some equation with (most of) the digits | 3,4,5,7,9 (and whatever you need to make it an equation). The | colour of those then would have told you all you need to know | to win. | myhf wrote: | So it's an interesting distinction that Wordle is generally | solvable in "hard mode", but the same constraint makes | Nerdle almost impossible. | quietbritishjim wrote: | As others have said, you can (and often should) make guesses | that don't satisfy all the clues you've found so far. That way | you can find / eliminate symbols much more quickly. | | It's funny there are so many people saying how much they hate | it. All power to you. But personally I like it way more than | Wordle. | | I basically like the solving part of Wordle but hate the | thinking up words aspect. Nerdle fixes that, but the equation | bit keeps it more interesting than a meaningless string of | symbols. | | Similar to how I prefer the numbers round on Countdown [1] to | the main letters game. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countdown_(game_show) | billforsternz wrote: | I prefer the numbers round in Countdown as well, but much | (much, much) prefer Wordle to Nerdle. Nerdle is an attempt to | make a Wordle for numbers, but to me it just doesn't work. | Today I quickly got 2+?+8=1?. Clearly ? can be any digit from | 0 to 9. I had four tries left so a 40% chance of winning with | no skill involved (I lost incidentally). | elcomet wrote: | Why would you put three ones? | | Maybe you should have tried the other numbers | hackeraccount wrote: | that is so odd - I think I had the same situation as well. I'm | not particularly numeric so I was briefly excited (I tried an | available number and realized it fit!) but then figured out | that there were multiple solution. | | And finally lost because I too didn't realize that I could re- | use an 8. I'd feel bad but it _could_ have been any of the | choices I did take so ... maybe not so fun. | cu3ba11 wrote: | I somehow managed to get the right-hand side of the equation | correct on the first try, which made finding the left-hand side | fairly easy. I guess I'll have to wait until tomorrow to try the | game out for real. | mon_ wrote: | Click the cog and enable "mini Nerdle" for another (easier) | challenge | core-utility wrote: | I'd be curious to know how success/failure metrics look after a | few days of users. How many actually reach success? | | Edit: I passed, barely. | benatkin wrote: | Did you make any guesses that couldn't possibly be correct | given previous feedback? I made one by accident. _facepalm_ | | On https://jamesl.me/hexle/ I made a guess that couldn't | possibly be correct on purpose so that I could guess more | digits. I've done the same with wordle. It's probably the least | useful w/ Nerdle because it's just 9 digits. | kleene_op wrote: | Wew. That was surprisingly fun! | | I managed to do it in three guesses, but man was I slow. | ankaAr wrote: | I Will wait for the ndimensionsmatrixle(? | scythmic_waves wrote: | Well that was frustrating [1]. I know I should have guessed a | different equation but I was like "there's no way I won't get | it"... | | [1] https://imgur.com/a/AclSjx8 | [deleted] | culi wrote: | EDIT: game's over. It's already been done: | https://rwmpelstilzchen.gitlab.io/wordles/ | | Is anyone keeping track? So now we have: | | *wordlists*: | | - [wordle](https://www.powerlanguage.co.uk/wordle/): wordlist | picked by creators partner | | - [byrdle](https://rbrignall.github.io/byrdle/): wordlist has to | do with choral music | | - [lewdle](https://www.lewdlegame.com): lewd words | | - [sweardle](https://sweardle.com/): 4 letter "sweary" words | | - [plantle](https://plantle.netlify.app/): | herbs/fruit/flora/shrooms/etc | | - [digitaltolkein](https://digitaltolkien.github.io/vue-wordle/): | lotr words | | - [taylordle](https://www.taylordle.com/): words from taylor | swift lyrics | | *math*: | | - [primel](https://converged.yt/primel/): 5-digit primes | | - [nerdle](https://nerdlegame.com/): math equations | | - [mathler](https://www.mathler.com): math equations | | - [mathle](https://mathlegame.com/): math equations | | - [hexle](https://jamesl.me/hexle/): guess the hexadecimal number | | - [byrtle](https://jamesl.me/bytle/): guess in base-10, but | answers/guesses are converted to binary | | *other*: | | - [squirdle](https://squirdle.fireblend.com/): pokemon, tells you | if you got the right gen, type, weight, etc | | - [absurdle](https://qntm.org/files/absurdle/absurdle.html): | adversarial wordle | | - [dordle](https://zaratustra.itch.io/dordle): 2 words at once | | - [quordle](https://www.quordle.com/): 4 words at once | | - [wordle](https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/): countries, correctness | based on distance | | - [letterle](https://edjefferson.com/letterle/): one letter | | - [squareword](https://squareword.org/): 2 dimensions! | | _languages_ : | | - [Yan Xie deYou bou](https://taximanli.github.io/kotobade- | asobou/): kana (Japanese) | | - [wordle (es)](https://wordle.danielfrg.com/): spanish | | _not wordle_ : | | - [three magic words](https://www.threemagicwords.app/) | | --- | | Edit: added suggestions, categorized them, and added descriptions | | I guess I'm the one keeping track | jedberg wrote: | Don't forget [lewdle](https://www.lewdlegame.com), wordle but | with only dirty words. | | And [mathler](https://www.mathler.com) which is the same as OP | culi wrote: | Thank you for preformatting :P Mathler seems a little less | chaotic. I think I could actually enjoy nerdle if it had some | limitation on one of the many variables to account for. | Mathler seems to do exactly that | jedberg wrote: | Yeah after I wrote that I realized that on this one you | have to solve for both the left and right size of the | equation, whereas mathler tells you right right side. I | think I prefer mathler for this reason. | vollmond wrote: | [sweardle](https://sweardle.com/): 4 letter words | amenghra wrote: | [Letterle](https://edjefferson.com/letterle/): one letter | culi wrote: | thanks I hate it | f154hfds wrote: | Also Lordle of the Rings: https://digitaltolkien.github.io/vue- | wordle/ | 12ian34 wrote: | Here's one I made earlier: Plantle[0] | | [0]:https://plantle.netlify.app/ | sp332 wrote: | If you're including Letterle, you might as well add Horsle | where the word is just always "Horse". | https://horsle.glitch.me/ | sp332 wrote: | My favorite so far is Dordle https://zaratustra.itch.io/dordle | culi wrote: | How exactly does this work? There's no instructions I can | find anywhere | sp332 wrote: | There are two words. You only get to make one guess at a | time, and it shows you the results for both words. The goal | is to guess both words in seven guesses. | culi wrote: | thank you! | duskwuff wrote: | Same as Wordle, except more so. You're guessing two five- | letter words at once. | bencollier49 wrote: | Also Byrdle, for Anglican Choral Music: | | https://rbrignall.github.io/byrdle/ | lapetitejort wrote: | What's next: choosing political parties to form a coalition | government. | werdnapk wrote: | Anyone done a flappy birdle yet? | jimkleiber wrote: | spanish: https://wordle.danielfrg.com/ 4 words in a square: | https://squareword.org | anthk wrote: | In Spanish you can win almost all gameplays with "aires" or | "seria" as the starting word. | James-Livesey wrote: | _math /other/idk exactly tbh_: | | - [bytle](https://jamesl.me/bytle) | | - [hexle](https://jamesl.me/hexle) | onychomys wrote: | Why do only two words at once with dordle when you could do | four words at once with https://www.quordle.com | cookie_monsta wrote: | There is a fair-sized (417 entries) list over here: | | https://rwmpelstilzchen.gitlab.io/wordles/ | culi wrote: | Ah thank you. I can get back to work now | POiNTx wrote: | [worldle] https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/ | cableshaft wrote: | also Globle: https://globle-game.com/ | omoikane wrote: | Japanese: https://taximanli.github.io/kotobade-asobou/ | somethingAlex wrote: | Replying so I can find this later. Thanks! | shagie wrote: | If you click on the comment directly ( | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30262341 ) you can click | the favorite link. | | That will then let you find it via https://news.ycombinator.c | om/favorites?id=somethingAlex&comm... (which is private) | which can be found on your profile page. | ClosedPistachio wrote: | Pokemon: https://squirdle.fireblend.com/ | madars wrote: | Taylordle: https://www.taylordle.com/ -- words from Taylor | Swift lyrics | lapetitejort wrote: | I solved it in six using only three unique digits and one unique | operator (excluding the required equals of course). I expected it | to be more varied and grew more despondent as all of the digits | and operators dropped away. Even with the restricted character | set I'd expect the operators could produce some varied gameplay, | but from the one puzzle I got I'm not too hopeful. Are these | hand-designed, or random for each person? | drivers99 wrote: | If it's like wordle, then everyone gets the same puzzle on a | given day. Your description matches what I played today (and is | a partial spoiler; one great thing about wordle is that people | have been good about not spoiling it). Tomorrow's may be quite | different. | lapetitejort wrote: | Upon solving, I got a popup saying the next puzzle would be | available exactly six hours from then. I suspected that meant | that puzzles would be released to me on my schedule, and may | or may not be unique. | nextstep wrote: | Cool idea. | | But here's the first game I played: | https://pasteboard.co/NYP4YfnNj0kk.jpg | | Perfect example of why this doesn't really work. I didn't have | enough information to narrow down the possible values that could | solve the missing parts of the equation I stumbled on in the | remaining tries. | sebzim4500 wrote: | Once you have the basic shape you make a guess where you | collect as much information as possible. This was my attempt at | the same equation https://imgur.com/a/7qGUC6k | GlitchMr wrote: | You don't have to play hard mode. No need to guess what you | deduced already, you can make a guess that doesn't use your | previous deductions. | joebob42 wrote: | I don't like that it doesn't understand that the equation doesn't | change if I move stuff. | | I had x+y+x=z and it won't accept y+x+x or x+x+y | 42jd wrote: | Seems the strategy is to eliminate as many numbers/operators | before you attempt to guess. Was able to get it in 4 as by the | second row I had the set of values to work with. | kawfey wrote: | I played it for a while but found myself constantly opening my | calculator or counting on my fingers. I failed at 4th grade times | tables lol. I could solve it every time, between 4 and 6 tries, | but it was just annoying to have to deal with stuff like that, | and that it requires specific numbers in spaces...not expressions | with the same numbers that evaluate the same e.g. 48/8+3=9 != | 3+48/8=9. | | This game type works so much better with word, at least with my | brain. | duck wrote: | I didn't think this would work... but then I solved it and now I | think it could be fun. Looking forward to tomorrow's game! | [deleted] | mspaper wrote: | You lost, the word was... | HPsquared wrote: | I notice it doesn't have a "hard mode" like Wordle, I assume | that's just too difficult? | bhelkey wrote: | I prefer to open with: 2*3+8=14 or 84/7-5=7. | | I find it tremendous important to find which place the equals | sign is in while eliminating operators and digits. | Kinrany wrote: | 3*4+-7=5 and 10=8/2+6 cover everything but 9. | bhelkey wrote: | Ooh, that is good. I figured that +- would be invalid but | nerdle accepts it. | madacol wrote: | nerdlegame 20 5/6 | | | https://nerdlegame.com #nerdle | cableshaft wrote: | 5/6 here too | | bbpppgbb bpppbgpg pbggbgbg gbggggbb gggggggg | imachine1980_ wrote: | the game is bad designed | | i have 2+8+ _=1_ literally won by chance if i decide test 2 | before 8 i would lose or worst the game is rig | ancode wrote: | nerdlegame 20 6/6 | | | https://nerdlegame.com #nerdle | ask_b123 wrote: | nerdlegame 20 4/6 | | | U+2B1B : BLACK LARGE SQUARE U+1F7EA : LARGE PURPLE SQUARE | U+1F7E9 : LARGE GREEN SQUARE | ancode wrote: | ok so no emoji in comments I guess | kodah wrote: | Sir, this is a Wendy's. | culi wrote: | See also: 418 I'm a teapot | f0e4c2f7 wrote: | Wow this is really fun! | | Enjoy your $1M from NYT in a month. | evanb wrote: | nerdlegame 20 3/6 | | gkmkkgkg | | ggkgkggg (emojis didn't render right in HN) | | gggggggg | | Knowing the answer I then opened a new tab to try something [that | I won't detail to minimize spoilers for today's puzzle] and got | linked to | | > >Number ordering and 'commutativity' | | > | | > We get it. 1+2 and 2+1 are effectively the same in maths | because of a principle called 'commutativity'. In the same way, 3 | _4 = 4_ 3. | | > | | > However in Nerdle, the only perfectly correct answer is the one | we're looking for, in the order we have it. So if our answer | contains 1+2, we won't accept 2+1. | | > | | > We've spent hours playing with alternative commutative-friendly | rules that would allow both 1+2 and 2+1. But so far, every | variant we've tried is simply not as fun to play. | | > | | > If you feel the commutativity challenge costs you an extra | attempt at a Nerdle challenge unfairly, you can always delete one | line from your game emojis before you share them. We won't tell | anyone, promise. | | The same issue afflicts mathle http://mathlegame.com/ and I think | poses a fundamental issue with this game. In spelling there is a | definite order. With commutative mathematical operations, not so. | WRODLE!=WORDLE but 1+2+3==2+3+1. They might LOOK like different | sentences, but they are not. They are the same. Sure, the glyphs | are in different orders, but no aspect of the Platonic sum can | distinguish them. They are one. | jameshart wrote: | RAISE and ARISE both mean 'the lift up', but they're different | words, and you're not going to win a wordle for 'ARISE' with | 'RAISE'. | | I'm not sure how you would want to win for getting the right | number in the wrong place in a game which provides clues to | find the right places by telling you when you have the right | numbers in the wrong places. | evanb wrote: | Re RAISE and ARISE: they are not pointers to the same place | in wordspace in the same way that 1+2+3 and 2+3+1 are in | sumspace. | | Re your second point: I love wordle. I'd love a game with | similar game play that obeyed mathematical principles. It | seems that nobody has found the right set of rules yet! | That's why I've been trying these once and stopping. I don't | find their rules beautiful in the same way that I do | wordle's. | jstx1 wrote: | This is very frustrating. It's like Wordle but without any of the | nice or enjoyable elements. | tluyben2 wrote: | I liked it but I don't like the 1+2 != 2+1 ; I understand why | it is but that is just annoying throwing away one go that you | cannot really know. Which is different from Wordle, game play | wise. | cookie_monsta wrote: | I am enjoying this one much more: | | https://www.mathler.com/ | [deleted] | sxv wrote: | I enjoyed it fwiw. | jonny_eh wrote: | You just described nearly every clone. | capitainenemo wrote: | What frustrated me was the guessing. By equation 3 I had | everything narrowed down except the 1s place in the answer | which was same as number in the equation. So, I spent the next | 3 guesses trying the remaining digits, and eventually losing | with 2 more digits left to try. | lalaland1125 wrote: | The trick is making guesses that you know are incorrect to | rule out multiple digits at once. | somethingAlex wrote: | What do you mean by incorrect? The equation has to be | valid, according to the rules. At some point I ended up | with 2 + <x> + 8 = 1<y> where x = y because of math. I had | 5 guesses left and 8 possibilities. That's just gambling | without the money at that point. | econnors wrote: | you can make guesses that you know won't be the correct | answer but eliminate the other choices (i.e. don't | include 2, 8, or 1 in your guesses) | [deleted] | capitainenemo wrote: | I guess he means construct an entirely different equation | without using 2, 8 and 1 (you had same issue as me BTW). | | I don't really enjoy that at all personally, but it is a | thing one could do. | | I don't guess impossible words in Wordle either :) | somethingAlex wrote: | Yeah I feel the same way. I want wordle to be about | guessing words, not constructing some max entropy string | within the constraints. | bmm6o wrote: | Sometimes it's what you need to do. If you know _IGHT, | guessing the solution is not the best strategy since you | get so little information each turn. You're much better | off with FILMS or BLOWN, even if you know they can't be | the solution. | elondaits wrote: | I use that same strategy in Wordle. Most often my first | word is SOARE and the second is MINTY... unless I got | like three matches in the first word, it's better to get | extra data quickly. | wartijn_ wrote: | You should give hard mode a try. That makes it a lot less | repetitive and more fun. | gpsz wrote: | TIL about hard mode. That's just how I've been playing | naturally; force use the found letters in subsequent | guesses. | hvdijk wrote: | It's all fun until you get something like FIGHT where the | last four letters are right and have to just guess from | LIGHT, MIGHT, RIGHT, SIGHT, TIGHT, WIGHT, anything I | might have missed, and there's no way to use any strategy | and you just have to randomly guess and hope you guess | right. | capitainenemo wrote: | I can see that happening, although for some reason it | hardly ever does with my usual guess strategies. I've | only had one word result in a few candidates. The fact | that it happened immediately and almost unavoidably in | the nerdle made me think this really wasn't for me. | scatters wrote: | You can guess WARMS, which will either give you the | answer (to input on the next try) or eliminate 4 of the | possibilities, leaving only 2 to guess. | | That's a best case of 2 additional guesses and worst case | of 3 (expectation of 2 1/3) which is better than your | strategy, which has a best case of 1, worst case 6, | expectation 3 1/2. | hvdijk wrote: | The comment I replied to started with "You should give | hard mode a try." In hard mode, WARMS is not a valid | followup guess. | aardvark179 wrote: | You can test every digit and symbol in 2 guesses. Once you've | done that it normally takes another 1 or 2 guesses to get the | answer. | donaldihunter wrote: | Yes, notably there is no hard mode. Elimination seems | necessary in order to have a chance of completing in 6 | tries. | low_tech_love wrote: | I enjoyed it much more than I thought I would! | tibbar wrote: | I made a solver for this and did some comparison with Wordle: | https://jacobbrazeal.wordpress.com/2022/02/07/solving-nerdle.... | TL;DR even though there's an order of magnitude more possible | words, you can solve it in fewer average guesses than Wordle | pretty consistently. | nneonneo wrote: | You note that the interface accepts a lot more words than are | in the dictionary, much like the normal Wordle game. I wonder | if you can exploit the full set of acceptable words to narrow | down the possibility space even further? I would not be | surprised if there's an equation in the full set that performs | better than the equation you initially selected. | pierrebai wrote: | That's because there are fewer letters. In wordle, ignoring the | fact that the word need to exists, you could make 5 guesses | with 5 new letters each time and still not quite exhausting the | letter space. With the math one, in two guesses you can figure | out the digits. | | Also, I play wordle in the hardest mode, which forces you to | always reuse known letters, which makes it a lot harder. (I | also playu in a clone with an extended vocabulary here: | https://www.arachnoid.com/wordgame/index.html) | anthk wrote: | Something like this is better, as the old TV game show | https://kitsune.tuxfamily.org/wiki/doku.php?id=homepage | de_keyboard wrote: | This... doesn't work well. There are too many possible solutions | given the clues, making it just luck. | | Consider: 2 + _ + 8 = 1 _ | | Now _ could be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0 | lalaland1125 wrote: | The trick is to rule out as many digits as possible using | guesses that you know are wrong. | | 9 + 4 + 7 = 20 for example is a more efficient guess than | naively trying to guess each pair. | | And there are even better guesses if you just use digits. | ilikepi wrote: | Yeah, and as with Wordle, I think there is some strategy that | can be employed in the first couple guesses to aggressively | eliminate digits and operators. Currently I use 3 * 5 + 2 = | 17 as my first guess in order to try all the prime digits, 1, | and the "easier" operators. There are probably better options | though... | stared wrote: | It is the same thing as with Wordle, when there is only one | letter missing and you have to iterate over the possibilities. | In words, however, typically there are only 2-3 correct | choices. | csimon80 wrote: | that was fun! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-08 23:00 UTC)