[HN Gopher] Sikorsky X-Wing (2013) ___________________________________________________________________ Sikorsky X-Wing (2013) Author : jeffreyrogers Score : 86 points Date : 2022-02-09 19:39 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.sikorskyarchives.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.sikorskyarchives.com) | wmij wrote: | Thanks for sharing this. I grew up a few miles away from the | Sikorsky plant in Stratford, CT. and as a kid remember seeing on | a couple of occasions some of the experimental helicopters flying | overhead. A lot of my friends parents worked at Sikorsky and | sometimes would mention the program, in particular the ABC | (advanced blade concept). It was mainly hushed but after what | seemed like many years the experimental programs were moved out | of Stratford or maybe scrapped. Then all the overhead traffic | everyday were from the Blackhawk and Super Stallion programs the | company was focused on to keep themselves going. | | I still marvel at the Sikorsky Skycrane, IMO one of the most | underrated aircraft ever produced. Whenever I see one I'm | transported back in time seeing them flying over my neighborhood | thinking that it was like a big giant wasp in the sky. | lizknope wrote: | If you are an 80's kid there was a G.I. Joe toy based on this. | | https://www.3djoes.com/skystorm.html | Pxtl wrote: | I totally had that toy. The mechanism for extending/retracting | the rotor always felt like it was about to finally break the | next time you used it. | jkaptur wrote: | I guess they worked hard to make it realistic ;) | neuronexmachina wrote: | Likewise! For some reason my clearest memory of the toy was | putting the little sticker-decals on. | sandworm101 wrote: | Sikorsky was attempting to bolt a helicopter atop a fixed-wing | aircraft. Rather than the best of both worlds they wound up with | the worst problems of each. A more interesting idea was the F-104 | VTOL concept. Rather than put helo blades on a fighter, take the | delta wing of a fighter and spin it like a helicopter blade. Take | off with it spinning then fix it in place when flying forwards, | potentially at supersonic speeds. The concept was never built but | would have avoided the inherent inefficiencies of Sikorsky's | approach. And a supersonic rotary-wing aircraft would be very | cool. | | https://elpoderdelasgalaxias.wordpress.com/2014/03/28/f-104-... | | https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/lockheed-f-104-%C2%... | gorgoiler wrote: | If you think it's cool with the .uk site, could you link | directly to some of the images in the thread? | | They currently require a forum login. | multiplegeorges wrote: | I'm not so sure that F-104 concept would've worked out. It | wasn't called the Widowmaker for nothing and the added weight | for the rotating wing assembly would've been quite substantial. | | As for bolting a helicopter to a fixed wing aircraft, they | bolted two rotors to the V-22 and it's working out pretty well, | despite early, deadly failures. | | Also, both the SB-1 Defiant helicopter and the S-97 Raider are | in development for fast helicopters. | | But, the X-wing concept looks like the coolest one of them all. | I would've loved to see it fly. It could have enabled city to | city fast transport without the need for local, urban runways. | trhway wrote: | >they bolted two rotors to the V-22 and it's working out | pretty well, despite early, deadly failures. | | my favorite which seems to have worked much better (and one | can say was a preview of the minimum what one can expect from | the current Cambrian explosion of modern multicopters) yet | didn't make it into production | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_X-22 | multiplegeorges wrote: | Yeah, that's a beautiful aircraft. The ducted fans look | more modern and sleek despite being decades older than the | V-22. | brimble wrote: | I'm not an aeronautical engineer or anything... but the downwash | from the rotors onto the large fixed undermounted wings on the | RSRA test model is some serious WTF, no? | engineer_22 wrote: | The test aircraft was designed to see whether the coanda effect | would produce the lift and controllability they desired. The | rotor for that aircraft would be fixed. They didn't intend for | VTOL with the model that had fixed wings, they would fly it | like a regular airplane and see how she handled. | brimble wrote: | Ah, that's less crazy, just probably drank fuel really fast | (which, test craft, so who cares) | wanderer_ wrote: | Ok, that's wicked. I guess I'm a kid at heart because I only | looked at the pictures :) | | Although looking at that render (erm, drawing) at the top it | looks like a lot of the thrust of the rotor would be eliminated / | redirected by the fuselage. It doesn't look like that later, so I | guess that was more a visual effects decision than a design one. | echelon wrote: | I'm not familiar with aviation, so I have no idea what I'm | talking about, but that rotor looks to me a lot like the | "stealth" helicopter remains from the Abbottabad / bin Laden | crash: | | https://www.wired.com/2011/05/aviation-geeks-scramble-to-i-d... | | Much different than this design: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_UH-60_Black_Hawk | dogma1138 wrote: | This concept was eventually developed into the S-97/RAIDER | X/Defiant line of helicopters.. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_S-97_Raider | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky-Boeing_SB-1_Defiant | | This is very much likely to be the template for the US next | generation of assault and recon helicopters. | carabiner wrote: | The X-Wing was very different from these concepts. The X-Wing | flew with a single _fixed main rotor_ with blowers to attach | the flow via the Coanda effect. The S-97 uses two conventional | contra-rotating rotors. The X-wing was much more radical | whereas the S-97 configuration has been in production usage for | decades in the Kamov helicopters. | Gravityloss wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocopter_X%C2%B3 this is more | like it | carabiner wrote: | Not sure you guys get it. The X-Wing could fly with a | _fully stopped_ main rotor. The rotor was completely still | in forward flight, but then could start rotating for hover | flight. | dogma1138 wrote: | The innovation of the S-97 and it's kin isn't the main rotor | but the pusher propellor which allows it to operate at speeds | and altitudes far above what a conventional helicopter can | achieve but it's not fast enough for the main rotors to be | locked in a fixed wing position, mainly because it's not a | good trade off for the roles which these fill. | | It overall it kept quite a few design elements from the X | wing such as the rigid wings on the main rotor and that the | forward propulsion is achieved by a pusher rotor instead of | the jet exhaust on the X wing. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-09 23:00 UTC)