[HN Gopher] Still-active phreak numbers, all safe and free
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Still-active phreak numbers, all safe and free
        
       Author : billwear
       Score  : 98 points
       Date   : 2022-02-12 19:40 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (stormrider.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (stormrider.io)
        
       | doctorshady wrote:
       | Someone set up a strange number with something like this a while
       | ago, with a bunch of randomized recordings. Some of these appear
       | to be inside jokes or otherwise have hidden meanings about
       | unorthodox behavior from phone systems - +1-248-200-0008.
        
       | wcfields wrote:
       | Semi-related:
       | 
       | RING A BELL (213) 223-6101
        
       | WalterGR wrote:
       | Related and really cool:
       | 
       | I made 50k calls to explore the telephone network
       | (shufflingbytes.com)
       | 
       | 333 points | ValtteriL | 7 months ago | 180 comments
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27602383
        
       | TazeTSchnitzel wrote:
       | > (800) 444-4444: automated number announcement circuit
       | 
       | Is this meant to announce your own number back at you? I called
       | from outside the US and got a very different number from my own,
       | which is fascinating.
        
         | rahimnathwani wrote:
         | Did you call directly, or use a calling card or similar
         | discount call service?
        
           | TazeTSchnitzel wrote:
           | Directly from my mobile phone.
           | 
           | I wonder if the number I got is the notional phone number of
           | a virtual international trunk line or something like that.
        
             | cryptonector wrote:
             | NAT for phones?
        
       | paulluuk wrote:
       | In case anyone else wants to try this from outside the US: dial
       | 001 (or +1) followed by the number, including the part between
       | parentheses.
        
       | throwawayHN378 wrote:
       | Are you the author? You you can make them callable links
        
       | hatware wrote:
       | > 1000Hz @ 0dB (this only makes sense if you're a phone person)
       | 
       | Any phone people here?
        
         | LegitShady wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliwatt_test
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_around
         | 
         | I'm not a phone person but I've heard of this before.
        
           | pimlottc wrote:
           | TIL 0 decibels [?] silence
        
             | pxx wrote:
             | Decibels are only ever a relative measurement on a
             | logarithmic scale. In this case, we aren't even talking
             | about sound (these are dB of power), but this is true
             | independent of base unit. For sound, to represent silence,
             | you actually need -[?] dB. The fact that this is a relative
             | scale is also why your mixer/home theatre receiver
             | represents full intensity as 0 dB and any volume
             | adjustments as some negative number of dB (some mixers may
             | allow you to go a little bit over 0 dB but of course this
             | risks clipping when a full-strength signal comes in).
             | 
             | Fun fact though: the sound scale is capped on the upper
             | extreme depending on your environment. You know how
             | recordings of launches of rockets sound like the sound is
             | clipping? It's not hardware limitations. The sound is
             | actually clipping as the pressure hits vacuum. See https://
             | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_pressure#Sound_pressure_... .
        
       | Scoundreller wrote:
       | Here's a fun one: a live feed of Fox News: 212-301-3799
        
         | doctorshady wrote:
         | 818-205-1622/1642/1662 are feeds of whatever is coming off the
         | satellite channels from Premiere Radio Networks.
        
       | mmaunder wrote:
       | This makes my heart smile. Rarely these days I'll connect with a
       | phellow phreak and we chat about bridge parties and other fun
       | stuff. One day the fone number will be a thing of the past and
       | all this an ancient memory.
        
       | mmaunder wrote:
       | I find myself wondering if CCITT5 tones are still in use on
       | international trunks. Anyone know? Any old BlueBeep users here?
        
       | zxcvbn4038 wrote:
       | I had a lot of fun with lists like these in the 70s/80s. To this
       | day I give all of my creditors a phone number which I know has
       | rung busy since 1983 thanks to lists like these. It would be very
       | interesting to war-dial all of the US exchanges in 2022 to see
       | what answers.
        
       | hahamrfunnyguy wrote:
       | If you like learning about telephone system, phone phreak Evan
       | Doorbell has a very interesting series of podcasts about his time
       | exploring the telephone system in the 1970's. The podcasts
       | include his recordings from that time period.
       | 
       | It was neat to hear some of the old tones and recorded messages I
       | grew up with, as well as ones that were well before my time:
       | 
       | http://www.evan-doorbell.com/production/group1.htm
        
       | reaperducer wrote:
       | It has the Hall and Oats recording number, but is missing the one
       | for They Might Be Giants. Does anyone know if it's still active?
       | 
       | TMBG used to release all of their new music on an answering
       | machine before you could buy it. Kind of a pre-internet version
       | of artists releasing singles on YouTube before you can buy the
       | album.
        
         | easton wrote:
         | (844) 387-6962 is still up
        
       | sandreas wrote:
       | I would suggest to put in a
       | 
       | <a href="tel:2027621401">(202) 762-1401</a>
       | 
       | so that they maybe would be really click-dialable :-)
        
         | 0x0 wrote:
         | Should probably be "tel:+1...."
        
       | greenyoda wrote:
       | > (914) 232-9901: pleasant hills DMS 100
       | 
       | In the NYC vicinity, dialing the -9901 suffix on many phone
       | exchanges will give you a recorded message identifying the
       | central office you reached. For example, if you call (212)
       | 736-9901, it tells you that the switch is on West 36th Street[1]
       | and a list of area codes/prefixes it serves. Amusingly, the
       | switch still identifies itself as "Bell Atlantic", which is what
       | the local Regional Bell Operating Company was called before it
       | became "Verizon" in 2000 (it was also briefly "NYNEX").[2]
       | 
       | [1] This building, apparently:
       | https://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=69989
       | 
       | [2]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications#Bell_At...
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | tiernano wrote:
         | NYNEX: just clicked that's what Phantom Phreak from Hackers was
         | on about: "the Phantom Phreak, king of NYNEX". And looking at
         | the dates, seems to gel... took me that long to figure out what
         | was said there!
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | see also, historical Bell System and other recordings/error
       | messages:
       | 
       | https://www.thisisarecording.com/Bell-System.html
       | 
       | https://telephoneworld.org/telephone-sounds/modern-north-ame...
       | 
       | Fairly easy to download and use on your own voip system if you
       | want.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | This is a nice collection of recordings of and about the phone
         | systems of the 70s:
         | 
         | http://www.evan-doorbell.com/production/group1.htm
        
       | gormandizer wrote:
       | In addition to the USNO master clock there are also
       | WWV Colorado: 303-499-7111       WWV Hawaii:   808-335-4363
        
       | alisonkisk wrote:
        
       | ButterWashed wrote:
       | I always enjoy reading about this kind of stuff even though a lot
       | of is only applicable in the US. On UK landlines you can dial
       | 17070 to access BT line test functions. When you dial a very well
       | spoken voice reads your phone number back to you. It's rarely
       | been useful to me but I did once astonish someone by using it,
       | they were convinced it was meant to be a secret number and that I
       | was probably breaking the law!
        
       | 13of40 wrote:
       | I'm always astonished that after 30 years and the installation of
       | two giant data centers, this little Oregon town hasn't upgraded
       | its telephone exchange. Anyway, here's an automated ghost from
       | the past: 541-447-0054
        
       | morsch wrote:
       | Not quite in the spirit, I suppose, but you can find out more
       | about most of the numbers by googling them. One guy published
       | youtube videos for a couple of them. Kind of fun.
        
       | irrational wrote:
       | > all safe
       | 
       | That's exactly what I'd expect a hacker to say ;-)
       | 
       | Now, where did I put my Captain Crunch whistle?
        
       | kQq9oHeAz6wLLS wrote:
       | There used to be (maybe still is) an 800 number you could call to
       | get your ANI, basically the billing number for whatever phone you
       | were calling from. Kinda fun.
        
         | ugl wrote:
         | The old mci number, died last year finally unless there's
         | another still up
        
           | doctorshady wrote:
           | There's a few: 800-437-7950
           | 
           | 800-223-1104 (passcode 910777)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-02-12 23:00 UTC)