[HN Gopher] The Beanie Baby Bubble of '99 ___________________________________________________________________ The Beanie Baby Bubble of '99 Author : stephsmithio Score : 38 points Date : 2022-02-15 20:55 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (thehustle.co) (TXT) w3m dump (thehustle.co) | amelius wrote: | How were these plastic beans even considered child-safe? | anonymousiam wrote: | Ahem. Bitcoin! *cough* | amelius wrote: | The article mentions Bitcoin! | hsbauauvhabzb wrote: | I'm not a crypto evangelist or anything, but what about | alternatives like Pokemon cards which seem to have increased in | value over the same period. | | There's currently a pump and dump on retro video games but I | don't think the same supply issues exist in Pokemon cards, but | I'm not actively monitoring either market. | janmo wrote: | Many parallels with what is going on with NFTs right now. | waffle_maniac wrote: | Only really rare cool limited edition collectible shit is worth | it. Like cars that Jay Leno collects. | edm0nd wrote: | Agreed. | | 19.94B locked up in NFTs atm | | https://defillama.com/nfts | khazhoux wrote: | I call bullshit. We're supposed to believe people have | invested almost $20B in NFTs? I have no data one way or the | other, but this fails the smell test. | [deleted] | gonzo41 wrote: | The reserve bankers would look at stats like that and just | shake their head at the money wasting away. | whatshisface wrote: | That's a total volume number, not a market cap. | | If you want to see some market caps[0] they're still | staggeringly high for what they represent, but beware: you | can't see the demand curve on a price history chart. There's | no way of knowing how much of the market could decide to sell | before they ran out of buyers. Market caps are used to | estimate value on wall street because it's imagined that the | number of people who would want to buy MSFT today for $1 less | than the price today are inexhaustible. | | That's much closer to the truth on the NASDAQ than on | whatever exchange people are using to trade their beanie | babies. | | [0] https://coinmarketcap.com/nft/ | [deleted] | paulpauper wrote: | except 1000x bigger. ppl are spending hundreds of thousands of | dollars like it's nothing. | dymk wrote: | It's easier to spend money when purchasing things with a | credit card versus cash. Or, users are more likely to make | in-app purchases when it's with pre-loaded Robux or V Bucks | rather than dollars. | | There's got to be something like that at play here with | ETH/BTC. It's so much easier to spend it when it's hard to | put into perspective just how much physical cash the purchase | represents. | ceejayoz wrote: | They're mostly probably not. | | https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/nft-sales-show- | evidenc... | brimble wrote: | "Collectibles" bubbles have been a feature of (at least) | American society for many decades. The tendency of some people | to fall for marketing that describes some mass-market junk as | an "investment" or "collectible" and to think they're really | getting in on something good, is documented in Fussell's | _Class_ , so it was already a recognizable trend by 1983. | pg_bot wrote: | If you are curious about asset bubbles, how they form and how | they unravel, I would suggest you read Hyman Minsky's "Can 'It' | happen again?". | jdkee wrote: | Relevant portion of the article: | | "According to economists David Tuckett and Richard Taffler, we | often view a hot new financial opportunity as a "phantastic | object," or an unconscious representation of something that | fulfills our wildest desires. | | These objects are "exciting and transformational." They appear to | "break the usual rules of life and turn aspects of 'normal' | reality on its head." They promise something far departed from | the market's typical behavior. | | During a bubble, we formulate a "collective hallucination" of | prosperity, and fall victim to groupthink, a phenomenon where "a | significant chunk of society feverishly buys into a shared dream" | and ignores reality." | jpm_sd wrote: | I think the most relevant portion of the article is: | | "There was one person who emerged handsomely from the Beanie | Baby bubble: Ty Warner. | | Aside from getting caught secretly hoarding $107m of his Beanie | Baby riches in an offshore Swiss bank account, Warner has kept | a low profile over the years -- but he's quietly amassed a | fortune the size of Djibouti's GDP. | | Today, the 73-year-old Beanie Baby inventor touts an estimated | net worth of $2.7B, good for the 887th richest person in the | world. He owns a fleet of luxury cars, a $153m estate, $41m | worth of rare art, and the Four Seasons Hotel in New York, | where you can rent the "Ty Warner Penthouse" for $50k per | night." | Lerc wrote: | "$41m worth of rare art" | | That bit at least is rather amusing. | jpm_sd wrote: | He could sell NFTs of it and burn it, and double his money! | technofiend wrote: | You're thinking small. You sell raffle tickets to let | someone burn the artwork and pocket the profits from that | too. Bonus points if there's a sponsor of the event. | carpintech wrote: | Also: https://www.independent.com/2022/02/08/beanie-babies- | billion... | Damogran6 wrote: | My son learned SO MUCH from 3d printing and selling fidget | spinners. | | Bulk purchasing skate bearings, charging 3 times as much for the | same plastic because it had different colors...and the STEM | school really couldn't do much, because that kind of thinking was | in their charter...plus, you know, distract the hands while | keeping their brains engaged. | tamaharbor wrote: | If I had $5 for every Beanie Baby my kids had.... Wait - I did. | Lerc wrote: | The current state of NFTs etc. amazes me in the context of Beanie | Babies. | | So many people have learned nothing. Granted the time gap means | these are entirely new people making those mistakes. | | We have such a degraded level of discourse now that if it were | used in the Beanie Baby craze there would be people arguing about | whether all soft toys are evil. | burnt_toast wrote: | I've been hoping someone would make a satirical beanie baby nft | website. | technofiend wrote: | >So many people have learned nothing. | | I would argue considering the plethora of NFT offerings both | legitimate and plagiarized that many people learned trying to | manufacture the next Beanie Baby is better than investing in | them, sort of like selling shovels in a gold rush is more | reliable than digging for gold. | throwanem wrote: | The difference is that stuffed toys have value independent of | speculation. | duxup wrote: | I wonder how many individuals were buying beanie babies | compared to nfts? | | I suspect far more beanie baby buying individuals. | pushcx wrote: | There's a great history of this, The Great Beanie Baby Bubble: | Mass Delusion and the Dark Side of Cute by Zac Bissonnette. It's | a quick read, almost entirely original reporting. Aside from the | colorful characters, it's really compelling to see the way some | individuals' and limited information combined with mass media | fell together to create the bubble. It seems like it couldn't | have happened at any other time because it needed cheap | independent publishing (both print and web) before ubiquity | eroded the perceived legitimacy. | camjohnson26 wrote: | Also Beanie Mania on HBO, not as insightful as the book but | still a good documentary. The Beanie Baby bubble was | essentially a textbook example of mania. | adam_arthur wrote: | Oh, bubbles can surely happen even in the era of widespread | information. Look no further than housing. | | A few points on housing: | | - real home prices have now surpassed the 2000s peak | | - household formation and population growth has been | decelerating, while building has been accelerating. | | - mortgage rates are climbing at a historically fast pace... If | inflation doesn't abate we can expect 5-6% mortgages within a | few months. Rates were kept low due to the belief in | transitory, but confidence in this is quickly eroding. | Mortgages roughly correlate with 10y treasury which is at 2%, | while inflation at 7.5%. typically these values are close | together | | - all in affordability will reach record lows within a few | months, if inflation and mortgage trends don't abate | | - there's clearly a mass FOMO/psychological phenomena going on | right now. Buyers aren't acting rationally from a financial | perspective | | Home prices can avoid a correction if we quickly return to 0 or | negative rates, which could happen. If inflation persists, they | will correct in a big way within a year or two as rates adjust | to inflation | | Sources: | | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/QUSR628BIS | | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNDCONTSA | | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SPPOPGROWUSA | | https://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage-rates/30-year-fix... | thatfrenchguy wrote: | > while building has been accelerating massively | | Nope, we have a decade of underproduction that led us to this | crisis | adam_arthur wrote: | Households to number of homes built is exactly the same as | it was in year 2000. You can compute it yourself using FRED | data. | | 1.1 homes per household (or vice versa). | | People who count from 2010 are cherrypicking the | underbuilding decade while ignoring the overbuilding | decade, 2000s. | brimble wrote: | Builders have been working as fast as they can (and | sometimes faster than they should) around here non-stop | since maybe 2011 or 2012, and it's not enough. Tons of new | neighborhoods, probably half the apartment buildings I know | of were put up in the last ten years, and so on, but house | prices and rent are nuts and still increasing faster than | inflation anyway. | | We're at the end of what _sure looks like_ about a decade- | long housing construction boom, in my city, which is not | trendy or growing very fast, and prices have done nothing | but go up at 2-5x the rate of CPI the entire time. It 's | possible the under-supply was _so bad_ that all the | construction still isn 't enough to catch up, but then why | did prices not _start_ higher than they did? I find it hard | to believe that this city 's gained new residents faster | than it's gained new housing. Something else is going on. | brightstep wrote: | As someone who just sold their home and is currently renting | while waiting for a correction, I definitely want this to be | true. Why are you confident those factors, absent a rate | intervention, will produce a correction? | adam_arthur wrote: | If inflation persists, I'm very confident in a correction, | as rising mortgage rates will push affordability to record | lows. We're already close | | If inflation abates quickly, then current prices can | maintain and become the new normal. | | The rate shock will price out pretty much every primary | buyer. Investors will stop buying and even sell if they | fear it's a peak. | | On top of this, huge amount of backlogged supply is about | to come into market in a big way in southern cities. The | majority of the building is concentrated there. I would be | very worried about Phoenix for example | Cd00d wrote: | Sorry, I think I'm not following. | | I think you're saying that housing prices are too high. Then | you're saying that if inflation continues housing prices will | drop? | | I totally get that most home sales are based on the monthly | mortgage bill, so when interest rates are high, house prices | are lower. But, if we have 7% inflation why wouldn't rates | increase AND prices increase? I don' think the outcome is | obvious when high inflation is coupled with high rates - | though I'm sure there are several experts ready to jump in | with information about how the US 70's and 80's worked :) | adam_arthur wrote: | It's a common misnomer. | | Inflation is good for assets once those assets have been | valued using an inflation appropriate discount rate. | Housing rate now is priced based on a 2% discount rate, not | 7%. | | After the asset is priced appropriately for the current | discount rate, then inflation is good for valuations. | | Median wages drive home prices in the long run. It's | possible home prices can be sustained if we see median wage | rapidly gain over the next few years. Gasoline going up and | driving CPI inflation doesn't make housing more affordable. | Only increase in incomes/buying power. | | Example: the 10y treasury was recently at 1%. If you bought | that as an inflation hedge you would have lost a lot of | money. Once people realize inflation is here to stay, they | won't accept lower rates of returns. | | Now it yields 2%, and soon likely 3%. Holding cash is | better than holding a treasury during the repricing phase. | Same logic applies for other assets. | | Real home prices were super low in the 70s relative to | today. Also wage inflation was very strong. I believe wages | doubled over the decade. Not the same at all. | marvin wrote: | What is your argument on mortgate rates? That lenders will be | unwilling to lend out at (still low) central bank rates due | to inflation? I don't follow the reasoning. | adam_arthur wrote: | Mortgage rates historically track the 10y treasury rate. | This is market driven, not Fed driven (outside of QE | impact) | | 10y treasury yields 2% while inflation is 7.5%. Ergo | mortgages will almost certainly run to 5-6% within a few | months once the market perceives that inflation is not | transitory and start selling off the 10y treasury en masse. | | We have seen this move already starting. It's why mortgages | have run from 3-4% in just two months. But not even close | to pricing in inflation. | | Mortgages were 5% in 2018 when inflation was significantly | lower. We may even get to 6-7% in a shorter period of time | Cd00d wrote: | I still have a visceral reaction to seeing Beanie Baby's actually | be played with. I had young cousins that were into "collecting" | them in the 90s, and remember part of it was keeping the tags and | not playing with them. | | Now I have young kids that immediately yank the tags and carry | them to school. I have nieces that have outgrown their's and have | passed them down to the family dog as a chew toy. Both give me a | moment of 'aaah aaah!' before I can make my rational brain | remember they're just a $5 stuffy that once had a bubble. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-15 23:00 UTC)