[HN Gopher] Akamai to Acquire Linode
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Akamai to Acquire Linode
        
       Author : nycdatasci
       Score  : 328 points
       Date   : 2022-02-15 21:10 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.akamai.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.akamai.com)
        
       | aetherspawn wrote:
       | I was really close to becoming a Linode customer last week for
       | several large boxes, but ended up buying hardware and self-
       | hosting.
       | 
       | The cost to cut in an enterprise fiber link (1000/400) to our
       | office was surprisingly low.
       | 
       | My experience trialling linode as a paying customer was really
       | positive (VERY competitive price, great performance), only
       | complaint being their NodeBalancer can't automatically handle
       | certificates like CF and AWS can.
       | 
       | Also, it needs to be mentioned because there's a lot of negative
       | in this thread: HUGE shout out to Linode for being massive
       | community supporters and donating HEAPS of free compute to uni
       | clubs and such, pretty much anyone with a charity certificate who
       | asks for it. Fantastic company that's easy to 'just talk to
       | people' rather than trying to find the right support silo.
        
       | endisneigh wrote:
       | I can't wait until I can just setup a database, nodes and it will
       | just handle auto scaling, maintenance and tuning by itself - on
       | my own hardware.
       | 
       | It's crazy how much you need to know to do the above.
       | 
       | Akamai - make it happen!
        
       | mastazi wrote:
       | Congrats Linode. I switched back to Linode after a few years on
       | Digitalocean (I wanted the server to be located in my country and
       | Linode offers that), I was really happy to see how much it has
       | evolved since the last time I had used it circa 2013
        
       | ehayes wrote:
       | Crap, I was just telling someone how much I liked Linode.
        
       | jonnycomputer wrote:
       | I think the only reason that I browsed this is that Linode hosts
       | a mattermost instance of mine, I'm happy with them, and I don't
       | want anything to change.
        
       | 37ef_ced3 wrote:
       | I love Linode. Strongly recommended.
       | 
       | For many years, I have run all my websites and services (back-
       | ends for apps, etc.) on a few $5/month Nanodes.
       | 
       | For temporary/experimental stuff I sometimes use Vultr and
       | Digital Ocean, but Linode's service and reliability is superior
       | (especially versus Vultr). Linode is just top-notch.
        
       | slig wrote:
       | Love Linode, unfortunately had to migrate away to DO because K8S
       | and managed Postgres.
        
         | mjrpes wrote:
         | Managed databases should be coming soon to Linode:
         | https://www.linode.com/products/databases/
        
           | slig wrote:
           | Great! If they let me have K8S clusters with 0 nodes I'll
           | move back there.
        
       | imwillofficial wrote:
       | Did not see this coming. Interesting development.
        
       | donohoe wrote:
       | After dealing with Akamai at a past role I can only offer my
       | condolences to Linode customers.
        
         | drcongo wrote:
         | I'm trying to think of an Akamai acquisition that has worked
         | out but coming up blank.
        
       | ritcgab wrote:
       | I have moved away from Linode since they started billing VMs in
       | hours. I don't like that cloud bs.
        
       | curiousmindz wrote:
       | Linode is a fairly underrated provider. Getting acquired will
       | hopefully bring them more visibility.
       | 
       | For Akamai, I wonder if this acquisition will have a negative
       | impact on their ability to work with other providers who are now
       | competitors. Similar to how AWS has trouble signing clients in
       | the retail industry.
        
       | kodah wrote:
       | How does DigitalOcean compare to Linode these days? One thing I
       | noticed off the bat is that Linode still offers phone and email
       | support, versus just a ticketing system interface.
        
         | lukeqsee wrote:
         | And they answer the phone.
         | 
         | I've called their support line many times to report business-
         | impacting issues, and they always answer within seconds
         | (literally), provide competent support, follow-up, and
         | genuinely _care_. Linode support may be better than Amex
         | Platinum Card support. :-)
        
           | Y-bar wrote:
           | I use DO and have no plans of moving away from there, because
           | on a technical and cost level I am happy with their offering,
           | but I can agree that their customer service is not at all
           | good.
        
           | silisili wrote:
           | > Linode support may be better than Amex Platinum Card
           | support.
           | 
           | If talking about today, almost assuredly given your
           | description.
           | 
           | This is pretty offtopic to the OP but I felt compelled to
           | chime in as it really irritates me, that Amex support has
           | gone into the toilet over the past 2 years or so. I remember
           | a time when you called, and someone would just answer "hello
           | mr xxx" if it was the number on file. Now it's phone menus,
           | typing in your card number, other details, hold times,
           | etc...even on Platinum support.
        
             | lukeqsee wrote:
             | Huh...I haven't had a Platinum Card for a few years (some
             | other cards provided better value), but that's
             | disappointing.
        
         | istjohn wrote:
         | I tried DO after using Linode for a few years, and DO felt more
         | polished and streamlined. DO's docs are great, too. But I
         | honestly have no complaints with Linode. Note that I'm just
         | running Nginx on a $5/mo VPS.
        
           | prirun wrote:
           | I've had a Linode for many years with no problems, and have
           | had to use their excellent phone service once.
           | 
           | I tried DO and hated it because they used a zillion 3rd-party
           | services on all their internal web pages (after being signed
           | in) so I was in a constant battle enabling things with
           | NoScript.
           | 
           | I have a small Vultr VM I use for testing. Their site didn't
           | require enabling a bunch of 3rd-party domains. They've been
           | rock solid as well, like Linode, and cheap as dirt: I have a
           | small VM with IP4 from years ago for $2.50/mo
        
             | seanw444 wrote:
             | You may have convinced me to move over to Vultr.
        
         | Macha wrote:
         | Linode has better support, DigitalOcean is a lot closer to a
         | cloud-lite setup with better APIs for automation etc.
        
         | systemvoltage wrote:
         | I wonder if Cloudflare is thinking about acquiring DO to round
         | up their next-gen cloud.
         | 
         | DO's UI has gone downhill since 2017. It is so bloated and
         | large. Used to be very compact.
         | 
         | Folks from Cloudflare if you're reading this - please keep your
         | UI compact. Your main UI (Dashboard) looks more compact that
         | the docs[1] which are too sparse and terrible for developers
         | who are not average consumers. They can handle the complexity.
         | They also appear to be designed by two separate UI design
         | teams. You guys need an authoritarian designer at the top.
         | 
         | [1] https://developers.cloudflare.com/
        
           | technofiend wrote:
           | Their website is more complex, but they offer many more
           | services than before. Not sure what else they could to do
           | streamline things? Prices have gone up a bit as well, but to
           | be expected to a certain degree. Still, I like them for their
           | fixed pricing and no surprise bills at the end of the month.
           | My only complaint is they have a tendency to kill some
           | processes with no warning and no ticket. I'd be fine if they
           | created a ticket to say "Hey, we're killing this process
           | because we're not sure you want to run it, if you do click
           | here to add it to an exclusion list" rather than silently
           | killing it.
        
       | judge2020 wrote:
       | I really hope Linode stays available self-serve, even if it
       | transitions to an Akamai hostname for server management. The
       | current Akamai availability is super limited and you'll often
       | need to give them a call if you want to run any regular traffic
       | through them or use a product not included in the free trial of
       | their services.
        
       | WesolyKubeczek wrote:
       | Oh no. Please no. I hope there's a competitor to grow in Linode's
       | place.
        
       | humanwhosits wrote:
       | I liked using Linode, though I can't help but feel some
       | apprehension about what will happen to it in the medium/long term
        
       | hoistbypetard wrote:
       | This worries me. I've been a happy Linode customer for a while.
       | I've mostly only noticed Akamai when they were screwing something
       | up for one of their customers. I try to be ready to migrate off
       | of any service like this at the drop of a hat, but I suppose this
       | is a good reminder to test my plans for getting off Linode, just
       | in case.
        
       | danpalmer wrote:
       | This is an interesting mix. In my experience Linode has a good UX
       | and is well targeted at SMEs, whereas I'm not sure anyone has
       | bought an Akamai contract anywhere but a golf course, and it has
       | a UX to match.
       | 
       | Is this Akamai trying to buy access to a market who would
       | previously not even consider them, or is it Akamai trying to buy
       | access to the more general cloud infrastructure market? If
       | they're trying to do both I can't see it going down well.
        
         | cauterize wrote:
         | We failed to build Linode like things internally. We innovate
         | through acquisition.
         | 
         | [ source: I was a part of those failures ]
        
       | soapdog wrote:
       | I hope nothing changes for the service. I've been a happy
       | customer for more than a decade.
        
       | angst_ridden wrote:
       | I have a lot of infrastructure on Linode, and have been a
       | customer for many years. I've been very happy with the
       | price/performance, especially compared with large providers some
       | of my customers use like Rackspace.
       | 
       | I hope that being part of a public company won't cause too much
       | pressure to reduce services or raise prices.
        
         | Neil44 wrote:
         | Same, I moved from rackspace to linode and never looked back.
        
           | hughrr wrote:
           | To be fair moving from rackspace to an OVH datacentre that's
           | on fire is a step up from my experience. I occasionally have
           | to deal with a Rackspace acquisition and it's hell.
        
       | Croftengea wrote:
       | From Linode blog:                 For the immediate future, we
       | will continue to operate as we always have. Akamai has no
       | intention of changing what has made us successful. This
       | acquisition will propel us both forward -- not take anything
       | away. Linode will soon be able to call on the power of Akamai to
       | offer entirely new products, services, expertise, locations, and
       | scale, while Akamai will be able to tap into Linode's deep
       | expertise in compute, storage, and on-demand infrastructure-as-a-
       | service.
       | 
       | https://www.linode.com/blog/linode/linode-and-akamai/
       | 
       | I like Linode and been with them for ~5 years. Their pricing
       | didn't change much (if at all) during that time but hosting
       | landscape got more competitive since then. Hetzner and OVH offer
       | a better value I believe. I hope Akamai's resources will help
       | them to not lose in the long run.
        
         | apple4ever wrote:
         | > Akamai has no intention of changing what has made us
         | successful
         | 
         | All the buyers say that now. In 2 years, it will change.
        
           | youngtaff wrote:
           | Yeh, why buy them if things aren't going to change...
        
       | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
       | One dying company absorbing another dying company.
       | 
       | Linode has really gone down the tubes. Just try to find out what
       | the prices are for their services. Or how to actually _use_ any
       | of the services they provide besides a VM instance. Can you find
       | the magical documentation site without Google? I couldn 't. And
       | pricing for some services requires you to sign up for an account
       | and attempt to deploy the service, or you have to go through a
       | "professional services" team for a "quote".
       | 
       | DigitalOcean and AWS don't have a problem directing users toward
       | product information or docs, and they provide a simple web UI to
       | use all their services. But Linode can't seem to grasp it, after
       | _years_ of trying to roll out a new web UI. Rather than provide
       | you simple managed services wrapped around specific technology,
       | they provide  "scripts" you can execute as a single VM boots up.
       | They can't even show you how to create a VPC without burying it 4
       | levels deep in a drop-down menu of a specific linode created in a
       | specific region.
       | 
       | I got so fed up with it that I moved my one remaining linode off
       | to DO. Not only do they have more services in more regions, but I
       | can actually find the information I need to make changes.
        
         | floatboth wrote:
         | How is Akamai dying? Isn't Akamai still the largest CDN around?
        
           | youngtaff wrote:
           | Enterprise only sales model and has traditionally been very
           | expensive and hard to buy.
           | 
           | When they launched their Image Manager product them had
           | trouble persuading sales people to sell it are it reduced
           | bandwidth charges
           | 
           | The legacy of lots of PoPs makes them expensive to run, and
           | purges take longer but ironically may help when it cones to
           | moving content to be really close to the end user
        
         | dan1234 wrote:
         | Pricing is at https://www.linode.com/pricing/ (Don't think
         | there's anything you need to sign up to see). Docs are at
         | https://www.linode.com/docs/
         | 
         | Both are the top menu.
        
         | dangrossman wrote:
         | I'm not understanding what you want to be different. Pricing
         | and docs are both linked to from the menu at the top of the
         | Linode.com homepage. I did not need to do any searching,
         | figurative or literal, to find them.
         | 
         | > Just try to find out what the prices are for their services.
         | 
         | From the Linode.com homepage, click "products" in the main
         | menu, click any product, and the pricing is on the page.
         | There's a "view full price list" link on each page to a price
         | list for all products on a single page:
         | 
         | https://www.linode.com/pricing/
         | 
         | > Can you find the magical documentation site without Google?
         | 
         | From the Linode.com homepage, click "Docs" at the top. "Docs"
         | is linked to https://www.linode.com/docs/
         | 
         | If you start from a product page, each contains a direct link
         | to that product's section of the docs. For example, the
         | Kubernetes page links directly to
         | https://www.linode.com/docs/products/compute/kubernetes/ with
         | the link "View product documentation >", above the fold.
        
       | dsl wrote:
       | I think this is Akamai figuring out they need to address the
       | self-serve market.
       | 
       | Akamai has 6x the edge network footprint of Cloudflare and has
       | all the cool trendy stuff like edge workers, they just suck at
       | selling to the developer.
        
         | lflux wrote:
         | Have they gotten faster at applying updates? it would take
         | something like 45 minutes to an hour to make any changes back
         | in 2014, when Fastly was doing sub-minute updates for any CDN
         | changes.
        
           | jsizzle wrote:
           | Yes, Akamai let's you deploy changes within minutes if not
           | quicker, that changes several years ago.
        
         | fomine3 wrote:
         | They should just expand their services to individual/small
         | business
        
         | chairmanwow1 wrote:
         | They explicitly choose not to sell to the developer. They want
         | big fish customers. This is why I can't find pricing on their
         | homepage.
        
           | recuter wrote:
           | One could reasonably conclude that they will start doing this
           | soon under their newly acquired Linode subsidiary.
        
             | wmf wrote:
             | Or they'll make Linode "call for pricing".
        
           | throwaway0a5e wrote:
           | Historically that's all there was. Random companies didn't
           | need CDNs and associated services. They ran a couple servers
           | in a data-center somewhere and called it good. Not like a
           | website for a company that manufactures dairy processing
           | equipment needs to handle a lot of load. The big corporate
           | customers where who bought that stuff. Then AWS came along.
           | 
           | It's a classic case of not seeing the up and coming market
           | because you were winning the existing market.
        
         | VWWHFSfQ wrote:
         | Not to mention that until they finally had a first-class
         | Terraform provider, their CDN was absolute nightmare to manage
         | at-scale. If you only have a handful of properties then sure,
         | it's fine. You can just point-and-click your way around and
         | make it work. Anything more than that and it was very painful.
        
         | Thaxll wrote:
         | "they just suck at selling to the developer."
         | 
         | They have all the major compagnies / F500, though so no need to
         | appeal to the HN crowd.
        
           | bloodyplonker22 wrote:
           | Yep, that's exactly how large businesses like IBM and HP have
           | failed.
        
             | ForHackernews wrote:
             | Ah yes, the terrible failure of _checks notes_ $116.46
             | billion market cap.
             | 
             | https://companiesmarketcap.com/ibm/marketcap/
        
               | duped wrote:
               | Down 35% over the past ten years, which is terrible
        
               | vel0city wrote:
               | They're doing so terrible, only making $5.7B in profit in
               | 2021.
               | 
               | I wish I could fail so hard.
        
       | ehayes wrote:
       | Linode's blog post: https://www.linode.com/blog/linode/linode-
       | and-akamai/
        
       | VWWHFSfQ wrote:
       | And thus was born a new entrant into the large public cloud
       | space. Congrats Linode!
       | 
       | I'm guessing Digital Ocean will be next.
        
         | benatkin wrote:
         | It seems like a massive acquihire to me - similar to Heroku.
         | 
         | I don't think that DigitalOcean will be acquihired.
        
           | Elof wrote:
           | Definitely not an acquihire. Linode build a super solid
           | business without taking any venture.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | mlyle wrote:
           | $900M is pretty steep to acquire about 200 employees, of whom
           | only a small fraction are technical.
           | 
           | Nah, this is about acquiring a business for 9x revenue...
        
           | samwillis wrote:
           | 18 years is a long time to run a business, I believe Linode
           | hasn't had much outside investment. I suspect the founding
           | team are looking to exit and will slowly pull back over the
           | next couple of years.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | antoniuschan99 wrote:
         | Less chance b/c DO is public now!
        
           | benatkin wrote:
           | Yeah, it would be quite an acquihire, and I am already
           | stretching the definition by including Heroku!
           | 
           | A true acquisition still is a strong possibility, but
           | certainly far less likely than before the IPO, and it might
           | be described as a merger.
        
       | eatonphil wrote:
       | Congrats caker and team!
        
       | tempnow987 wrote:
       | I had a sour taste from what I remember being misleading
       | communication around very serious control plane hacks of linode.
       | 
       | A lot of bitcoin theft in 2012 (maybe by their own staff?)
       | 
       | 2013 some kind of cold fusion / HTP hack
       | 
       | Another CF / HTP hack here.
       | 
       | 2014 brought the MySQL server no password stuff.
       | 
       | 2015 ish some kind of total root compromise?
       | 
       | You can get a feel for all this here including the denials / lack
       | of notification.
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10845985
       | 
       | Maybe 2016 same issue?
       | 
       | https://www.zdnet.com/article/cloud-firm-linode-resets-user-...
       | 
       | Not a company I'd put much actual production onto. Imagine if AWS
       | had a hacker running around with total root access, able to reset
       | MFA tokens to their own etc with no notice to customers. I'm not
       | even sure such root access exists on AWS.
        
         | frakkingcylons wrote:
         | You can't just imply that the linode staff assisted or were
         | involved in stealing crypto currency from their customers
         | without actually providing any evidence.
        
         | INTPenis wrote:
         | I hate to say it but I recently moved away from Linode after
         | their /64 block in Frankfurt was banned by all Google services.
         | And even though all their kubernetes nodes have a public ipv4
         | address they were somehow unable to fallback on this when their
         | ipv6 didn't work.
         | 
         | And when I suggested this to their support they acted like I
         | was crazy and said there is no way to switch between ipv4 and
         | ipv6. Well I don't work in networking but I do work for a major
         | telco and I know our networking guys could have done that
         | routing change, easy.
        
           | unilynx wrote:
           | Are you referring to the geoip issue ?
           | https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-runner/-/issues/28769
           | 
           | This was resolved and it didn't appear something nefarious or
           | any kind of ban was going on, so if you have some references
           | I'd love to see them
        
           | benatkin wrote:
           | Yep, confirmation from their staff here:
           | 
           | https://www.linode.com/community/questions/22243/google-
           | and-...
        
           | hughrr wrote:
           | We blocked the entire of Linode AS63949 ranges because we
           | were getting attacked from random owned nodes and it was
           | tripping our IDS constantly. Just got fed up with it in the
           | end and decided to hose them.
           | 
           | To note, we have had problems with AWS blocking random
           | addresses as well where we've had staff abroad.
        
         | Scoundreller wrote:
         | A 2012 Bitcoin hack victim was none other than a lead developer
         | of Bitcoin. Back then, they ran a Bitcoin faucet on it that
         | gave out a paltry 0.25 Bitcoin at a time.
         | 
         | I never bothered to jump through those hoops for like a dollar
         | (now about US$10k):
         | 
         | http://gavintech.blogspot.com/2012/03/bitcoin-faucet-hacked....
         | 
         | He only lost 5 bitcoin (like $20 then or $200k today), but
         | another lost 3100, or around... $124 million today:
         | 
         | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=66916.0
         | 
         | They ran a Bitcoin mining pool and this hack motivated them to
         | create a hardware wallet:
         | 
         | https://blog.trezor.io/how-trezor-was-born-from-a-hacking-at...
        
           | tempnow987 wrote:
           | Wow, that some major root level compromise at linode. It's
           | interesting how quiet they kept these things in those days.
        
             | ethbr0 wrote:
             | One of the many reasons every country needs more serious,
             | standard, and mandatory public disclosure laws for cloud
             | infrastructure breaches.
        
               | folmar wrote:
               | Looking from the end user end it seems nice, but will
               | soon be weaponized in all possible mannar, sloppily
               | executed, and too much data to ingest.
               | 
               | For reference there is mandatory disclosure of (serious)
               | data breaches in the GPDR and it's very uncommon that the
               | disclosure actually occurs.
        
           | ipaddr wrote:
           | The one thing I don't understand is if that many coins were
           | stolen and every transaction is traceable shouldn't there be
           | a trail? The owner has 124 million reasons to find those
           | coins. Is the ability to track past transactions not as
           | possible as it seems?
        
           | glofish wrote:
           | somebody please explain to me how is it possible that the
           | owner reports losing $124 million, then they casually mention
           | in the reply that: no problem, I'll just cover it with my own
           | money ...
           | 
           | (another recent story on ether hack had the same "resolution"
           | the organization just chose to replaced the losses) ...
           | 
           | where is that money coming from? does not seem real
        
             | dsl wrote:
             | Because back then the price of bitcoin was much lower. It
             | is $124 million in today dollars, like $1,000 in back then
             | dollars.
        
             | Scoundreller wrote:
             | That's what it would be worth now. Was worth like 1/10000th
             | of that back then. They probably covered it with their
             | previously earned holdings that could have been another
             | fraction of that.
        
             | saghm wrote:
             | I imagine they repaid the value of the bitcoins at the
             | time, which would have been a lot less
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | vel0city wrote:
             | The 3,094 BTC stolen happened in 2012. The price of BTC in
             | March of 2012 was ~$3-5 USD, so ~$15,500K on the high end
             | and ~$9,300 on the low end.
        
         | Twirrim wrote:
         | I ended up dropping Linode as a result of the hacks, after
         | having been a customer for years, both because of the nature of
         | the hacks, and how they communicated.
        
         | imachine1980_ wrote:
         | this worry me, any similar compromise in digital ocean for
         | example?
        
           | btgeekboy wrote:
           | Not really a compromise but there was a point where they
           | weren't wiping block devices by default:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6983097
           | 
           | Not sure if that's changed. (Hopefully it has!)
        
       | baggy_trough wrote:
       | Enjoy the value of Linode. Hope Akamai doesn't ruin it.
        
         | julik wrote:
         | Same thoughts here, I've emigrated mostly to Linode, now a
         | search begins to a decent small contender.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | mindslight wrote:
       | f. I've been using Linode since before "cloud" became a buzzword.
       | I'm sure it's just a matter of time until the screws get turned.
       | That seems to be the economic environment we're currently in,
       | too.
       | 
       | Maybe Akamai will stop blocking Linode IPs for their firewall
       | snake oil? One can dream.
        
       | teepo wrote:
       | Great news for the Linode team. Another isolated silo for Akamai.
       | Honestly the way Akamai pieces together product offerings through
       | acquisitions to compete has made it very difficult to leverage
       | their portfolio without hiring consulting firm to integrate a
       | solution.
        
       | lukeqsee wrote:
       | Really happy for Linode. I cannot say enough good things about
       | the quality of their products and support.
       | 
       | As a customer who's built significant value on their
       | infrastructure, I'm a little bit worried about the impact this
       | acquisition will have on their operations. I really hope it gives
       | them the resources to improve on the same mission, and not the
       | beginning of significant change!
        
         | stanislavb wrote:
         | As a long time Linode user, and I've given a try to others as
         | well ... e.g. Digital Ocean, Linode's been my infrastructure
         | choice for many many years.
        
         | linuxlizard wrote:
         | As another long time user of Linode, I have had nothing but
         | good experiences with them. I hope their quality stays up.
        
         | ivyirwin wrote:
         | Same here. Linode has been my go to infrastructure ever since I
         | decided I needed to leave MediaTemple and become serious about
         | my server infrastructure. I feel like Linode made me a better
         | developer by helping me learn the devOps side of the business.
         | Back in the day, their guides were the best in the business,
         | though I feel like DO is winning that game now, especially from
         | an SEO standpoint. These days I look for DO guides on how to
         | tune my Linode machines.
         | 
         | Congrats to the Linode team, please don't leave us hanging!
        
       | _nickwhite wrote:
       | As a long time Linode user, I hung in there through a lot of
       | service issues and growing pains. Linode has always been just one
       | of a handful of providers I have, and I figured at _some_ point,
       | all of these issues will result in a solid platform. Well, over
       | the last couple years, Linode HAS achieved this, and is now one
       | of my most reliable platforms.
       | 
       | I also use Prolexic DDoS service from Akamai, which was a
       | standalone company until 2014. Akamai bought them, and the
       | service actually vastly improved, so let's hope that Linode +
       | Akamai's size and buying power will result in something even
       | better.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-02-15 23:00 UTC)