[HN Gopher] Ian Cutress leaves Anandtech ___________________________________________________________________ Ian Cutress leaves Anandtech Author : zdw Score : 308 points Date : 2022-02-18 15:07 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.anandtech.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.anandtech.com) | mensetmanusman wrote: | Technology Journalism is interesting, because those most | qualified would almost always be taking a huge pay cut to | contribute. | | Those technologists that work in a field of interest only publish | in illegible patent speak or keep trade secrets. | blowski wrote: | Don't remember who said it but "technology writers either know | about technology or writing, rarely both". | bavell wrote: | RIP Anandtech. It was the first tech news site I followed as a | teen and got me into hardware, letting me peer behind the curtain | of these mysterious machines we all use. Probably responsible for | me choosing computer engineering in university. Many good | memories of flashes of insight, wonder and amazement. | | Haven't been frequenting the site as much since Anand left and I | felt the site's days were numbered. They still had good content | coming out but with Ian leaving, I think most (all?) of the old | guard has left and this is probably the final nail in the coffin. | uluyol wrote: | I've always enjoyed Ryan Smith's articles, but I think he's | been busy with other duties since taking over. I have noticed | that the quality of work coming from their junior writers | improves over time. I mean just look at Ian. I always enjoyed | his writing, but in the past few years it has gotten really | really good and he's expanded to doing many Q&As and interviews | (where you know, he actually asks interesting and tough | questions). | awiesenhofer wrote: | Don't count them out just yet - they still got Billy Tallis | excellently covering the storage side of things. At least I | think they do, haven't seen much of him in a while. | IanCutress wrote: | Billy left in the middle of last year | awiesenhofer wrote: | Damn, now I'm getting pessimistic as well. Thank you for | the clarification! | vbphprubyjsgo wrote: | Isn't that just a techspam website? I only read their monitor | reviews and they were all wrong. | georgeburdell wrote: | Not unexpected. He's been building his own brand (TechTechPotato) | on YouTube for a while. | pxeger1 wrote: | Steve from GamersNexus said a few weeks ago he might have just | managed to catch "a big fish" in hiring... | [deleted] | IanCutress wrote: | Pfft I didn't expect this to be HN worthy, but y'all are amazing | | I'll still be around, doing my YouTube channel on tickover before | other ventures are ready. Just need to square some things away, | and I'll probably announce via Twitter next week. | | Anything input always welcome! | lynguist wrote: | No, that's so sad! You're my favorite writer at Anandtech! I | was loading the main page of Anandtech every few days to see if | you wrote a new article! | dilippkumar wrote: | Regular reader here. Good luck on your future ventures! | | If you are going to continue to participate in written content | on the internet, please remember that RSS is not dead and there | are many of us who consume content exclusively via RSS. My 2 | cents :-) | wilsonjholmes wrote: | Yes! | sydthrowaway wrote: | Are you going to join FAANG? | toiletfuneral wrote: | ericd wrote: | Thanks for all the great articles over the years, especially | the in-depth CPU ones! | [deleted] | hendersoon wrote: | I'll read anything you write Ian, good luck on the next step! | CitizenKane wrote: | Hey Ian, thanks for all the very thoughtful content over the | years. I started reading Anandtech shortly before Anand left | and I remember being worried. However, in hindsight there was | clearly nothing to worry about. | | Your analysis helped convince me to go all in on some AMD stock | purchases that ended up really saving me over past year. It's | beyond appreciated, and I'm far more knowledgeable about | semiconductors thanks to you! Best of luck in your new journey | cebert wrote: | I always loved reading your articles and interviews. You never | dumbed things down, which I've always appreciated. | ethbr0 wrote: | One curious question. | | No names or details, but in hindsight was there ever news or | review points that you felt should have been reported, but | wasn't because of publishing / relationship concerns? (Read: | actual, factual details... discounting pique at counterparties | / PR being assholes from time to time and deserving to be | blasted) | | I've always been curious how that balances. Would hope the type | of stuff AnandTech covers has more natural immunity (vs | something like games journalism). | | PS: Thanks for all your work over the years! Between you and | Anand, you guided years of PC builds, starting with a Pentium | IV on an Asus P4C800-E Deluxe to get my university fiber-to- | the-room traffic off the PCI bus. ;) | IanCutress wrote: | There were stories over the years that I wanted to write but | didn't get approval. Anything that might instigate a | political discourse was discouraged, for example, such as a | story about holding an event about wireless network | connectivity in an area where locals struggled to get even | basic phone service. | | I mean, there have been times where PR have been rude and | incorrigible. Nothing to the extent that it'd be worth | putting them on loudspeaker for, as that'd gut any future | relationship, and sometimes it's down to one person in the | chain causing the fuss, not the culture. | | Part of what I've learned at AnandTech is how these chains of | command work - you're not speaking with Company X, you're | speaking to Person A on behalf of company X, and sometimes | the information they are feeding you goes through 15 hands | before it gets to you and if there's a bad apple in that | chain, it could cause it all to go pear shaped. That's also | part of the 'behind the curtain' I've tried to showcase in my | reporting, rather than just simply dealing with a big box | with company logo on it that prints money. | | Part of the balance you describe is, in my mind, simply the | result of reporting on people. If you stick to the science, | the research, there's less room for disagreement. | | Then again, Samsung stopped sampling us smartphones because | every Snapdragon/Exynos review we did, with industry standard | tests and power measurements, showed Snapdragon ahead for | several years. They felt it wasn't in their best interests to | sample us anymore, so we ended up buying the hardware after | launch. At least, that was the PR team who didn't want to | talk. The SoC team still wanted our input, but the way | Samsung works, it was always difficult to have those | discussions. Compare that to Samsung Foundry, who have | invited me to consecutive industry events to learn about new | features - they loved the coverage, and the questions I ask. | Same company, different BUs, different media list, different | blacklists. | | Perhaps it's worth a book. When I'm retired. | CyanBird wrote: | Looking forward to your future adventures! | | I guess we all already can take a guess at where you might end | up haha | | Cheers! | apetresc wrote: | Does the guess rhyme with "sinus"? | willis936 wrote: | Not "wenis"? | ksec wrote: | Oh no. I have long suspected this will happen Anandtech seems to | have trouble getting editor to stay. And people are either | leaving or becoming freelance. Andrei left not long ago. I am not | even sure if they have a full time editor any more. | | I think he is going to spend a lot more time on his Youtube | Channel. OR,a possible scenario.... Would he be joining STH? I | know he sometimes comes to HN :) | | >and all I've wanted to do is lash out! | | I am glad I am not the only one. And that is why I enjoy | Anandtech and Ians writing so much. To educate the reader instead | of being mislead by marketing and sloppy journalism that are only | here for clicks. | AlphaSite wrote: | I know LTT is also starting a lab and talked about getting | certain folks to join his team... | EtienneK wrote: | This was my 1st thought as well. Also, Linus said "think I | can't afford you? Try me". | szundi wrote: | This may change later when he might realize (hop not) that | these guys don't return enough on investment. But maybe LLT | is the one who will be popular enough, who knows. | ethbr0 wrote: | Good review sites suffer the same problem as government: from a | financial standpoint, you cannot afford to pay people | competitively vs their alternatives, for the skills you really | want. | | So it becomes a labor of love. But that only goes so far, for | so long. | | IMHO, in an industry like that, you have to be honest about | what you're bringing to the table for employees in lieu of | compensation: an opportunity for increased name recognition and | networking in a public role, and the fun of being a public | face! | | But! You also have to continually deepen the bench with new | prospects, because you know you're going to be continually | hemorrhaging top tier talent to job switching. | | Credit to AnandTech that people stay for as long as they do. | 10+ years is damned impressive! | Ataraxic wrote: | I remember joining the anandtech forums in the very early | 2000's. I'm continually surprised how great a resource it's | remained for over 20 years now. Certainly impressive! | ghaff wrote: | Journalism is one particular problem. I expect most halfway | decent tech journalists could head to many tech companies to | do content marketing and make a lot more money--though they | might well find the work less interesting. | | Arguably, pay disparities in the industry exist more broadly | even if you just restrict the conversation to | developers/engineers. I suspect that the big tech companies | are sucking a lot of the oxygen out of the room at least in | the US. Some people may not _want_ to work for those | companies and others, whether because of lack of skill, poor | interviewing, or just bad luck, can 't get an offer. But if | someone can get in, it will be hard for a lot of other | companies to match the comp. | erosenbe0 wrote: | Big tech SWE interviews seem to be just tests that are very | poorly administered. With practice and some luck a large | segment of the developer population can pass within a few | years of really diligent effort. Some need a lot more | practice than others though. | | I don't know why they don't just administer real tests. | Probably some kind of demographic or legal nightmare? | ghaff wrote: | Well, for one thing, if it's a standardized test, it will | be leaked even if there are a few different versions. "A | few years of really diligent work" also seems a pretty | high bar to improve odds of getting a job at a handful of | companies. | creato wrote: | If people are spending a few _years_ to prepare, that's | probably enough time to self educate to actual | competence. | ethbr0 wrote: | Given enough optimization and no upper limit on | prospective hire annoyance, any interview test series | eventually evolves into an undergraduate degree program. | sidkshatriya wrote: | > I have long suspected this will happen Anandtech seems to | have trouble getting editor to stay | | Wasn't Ian associated with Anandtech for 10 years? That seems | like a long enough in today's world. | | Also please note that working for Anandtech gives you a lot of | profile and publicity. Other people in the industry may want to | snap you up! | munificent wrote: | _> Anandtech seems to have trouble getting editor to stay._ | | I don't think we should necessarily celebrate people continuing | to do the same thing over a long period of time. Humans like to | grow and experience a variety of things. Change is good. You | have 11 lifetimes: | | https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2012-09-02 | ghaff wrote: | Perhaps but | | 1.) People can grow and change within a single organization, | especially given that they're not spending a lot of time to | learn a new place and | | 2.) We also shouldn't celebrate people because they jump | around every 18 months when something isn't going quite their | way or they've gotten bored. | munificent wrote: | Sure but in this case, the person was there 10 years, so | (2) doesn't seem to apply. | ghaff wrote: | Oh certainly, 10 years is a very respectable tenure with | an organization. That's been around the point where, at a | couple of prior jobs, I was definitely ready to move on. | mastazi wrote: | my biological clock seems to be 4 or 5 years max in an | organisation and about 10 years max in a given career (sw | development is my third "career" so to speak, what I did | before was completely unrelated; I'm already planning the | next endeavour which is only tangentially related to | "tech") | [deleted] | kapilvt wrote: | I appreciate so much two folks in tech reporting Ian and Jon | (Corbet at lwn.net), over the last decade they have both put out | so much content, that frankly pulls the behind the layers to make | them not magic but, science and journalism with integrity.. kudos | and if we find ourselves in go fund me journalism, know that I'm | happy to contribute to the cause. | tom-thistime wrote: | Maybe he'll get Joy Division back together again. | mrweasel wrote: | Isn't that a brand of sex toys? | acomjean wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joy_Division | | and Ian Curtis.. Vs Ian Cutress... | agumonkey wrote: | More like an architectural choice. | jpgvm wrote: | Ian if you come by HN and see this I would like to say thanks for | all the amazing content over the years. Tech needs quality | journalists and you are one of the greatest we have ever had. I | hope you land somewhere where you can continue to output such | great stuff. | IanCutress wrote: | Thanks :) | awill wrote: | I feel AT is great for enthusiasts. I want them to become more | mainstream, as their reviews are so much better than generic tech | sites, but they need a better balance. They sometimes release | iPhone, Galaxy or Pixel reviews weeks or even months after | launch. Just look at Youtube, and impact on views from being | first with a review. Reviews that arrive weeks after a product | launch don't have mass-market appeal. AT either doesn't | understand the market, or is understaffed. | | I get a thorough review can't come out on day one, but they need | to get something out. Maybe a first look with some opinions, | followed by a more thorough review a week later. | IanCutress wrote: | Simply understaffed. Since I've been full time, we've only ever | had two full time employees. | | Also, Samsung doesn't sample AnandTech. | awill wrote: | Interesting. Is that because you caught them benchmark | cheating? :) | trynumber9 wrote: | Andrei, who did a lot of the measurements in their CPU reviews, | left a few months ago. Now with Ian gone it is likely the end of | Anandtech. | | But I'm impressed it managed to make it past Anand's departure. | uluyol wrote: | They adapted after Anand and Brian Klug left, so hopefully they | can do it again. | Rafuino wrote: | Let's hope Tech Tech Potato continues! | bonyt wrote: | I wonder if he's going to LTT's labs venture? | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pt3-6BsWlPk | thereddaikon wrote: | That was my first thought. Linus has hinted heavily about | industry veterans applying. I wonder if Ian is one of them. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | Linus Tech Tips is all-in on the clickbait-centric style of | YouTube production that is the polar opposite of quality tech | journalism. They emphasize exaggerated reactions and silly | accidents over the thoughtful and well-prepared content that | Ian's writing is about. Some people love it (obvious from their | numbers) but I always feel like it's a waste of time to watch | his videos because it's 90% entertainment and maybe 10% useful | info. Entirely different audiences. | | So I hope he's not joining them. It would be great if he formed | his own venture instead. | baybal2 wrote: | > Linus Tech Tips | | The first thing I though before googling it up was that Linus | Torvalds got into youtubing. | CyberRage wrote: | Had to chime in after seeing this comment. LTT is definitely | a click-bait, simple and shallow channel but that's their | strength. | | LTT wouldn't be as big if they did highly technical "boring" | analysis, they can be so big and influential because they are | light, layman-friendly almost at a stupid level. | | Youtube is about attracting the crowd and let me tell you | something, the crowd isn't very smart for the most part. | bavell wrote: | On one hand I respect their success - what they do isn't | easy and they run a successful business. On the other hand, | I'm not at all impressed with their info-sparse, silly, | light-hearted approach to their content. I understand | there's demand for it in the market but it's a big turn-off | for me... | tomc1985 wrote: | You just described everything that is wrong and also most | profitable about Youtube culture | PolygonSheep wrote: | LTT Labs could end up being like BuzzFeed vs BuzzFeed News | where a site famous for its clickbait, inane quizzes, and | half-assed listicles started doing serious investigative | journalism. | | If you told me ten years ago that BuzzFeed's news site would | end up winning many prestigious awards including a Pulitzer | Prize I would have thought you were joking. | azeirah wrote: | The interesting thing is that that was all planned from the | start. | | I think it's a TED talk but I'm not entirely sure. Buzzfeed | was an MIT grad product to figure out how far they could go | with virality and virality alone. If the project proved | succesful, they'd invest in serious journalism. | | It's all there in the video I don't have a link to! | JohnBooty wrote: | What an insightful point. I was thinking the worst, but | this gives me some hope. | bavell wrote: | Totally agreed. I've been following Anandtech since ~2008 | along with other tech news but I've always had a very low | opinion of LTT. I've watched a few videos but they feel so | fake to the point of cringe. I'm definitely in their target | demo but they're way too childish for me to take them | seriously. | sockaddr wrote: | Disagree. His videos definitely have the click-baity look and | titles. But the content is usually pretty top notch even if | you need to ignore some silly parts of certain videos. I | think his channel pairs well with GamerNexus. | BoysenberryPi wrote: | I agree you about LTT to a certain point but I think you are | dragging them too much. LTT has done some very good tech | journalism in the past and brought some very important | stories to light. While I do not prefer them for my hardware | information for reasons you stated, I would not call them the | polar opposite of quality. | jolux wrote: | I don't know if this has changed but at some point I | stopped watching LTT because my own knowledge of computing | exceeded his (as far as I can tell) and I started noticing | trivial technical errors in a lot of the content he made, | delivered with unwarranted confidence. He's not an | engineer, he got his start demoing products for tech | retailers. | | This is why I've long since preferred AnandTech to LTT. | They employ people like Cuttress, who has a respect for | scientific rigor and can go deep into the technological | weeds and actually report usefully from them, whereas I | feel LTT was limited mostly to surface-level observations | when I watched regularly. | ethbr0 wrote: | YouTube is HN taken to the extreme: nobody asks for | credentials if you present content with infinite | confidence. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | That's the 10% good info that I referred to. | | If I drop into a random page of a random Ian Cutress | article, there's a high probability it will be interesting | and well thought-out content. | | If I drop into a random LTT video and scroll to a random | timestamp, it's most likely going to be some minimal | content arbitrarily stretched past the 10 minute threshold | for YouTube monetization. I can usually find the answer to | the clickbait headline with enough seeking around, but many | of his videos contain so little actual content that it | could probably be summarized in a couple of Tweets. His | specialty is expanding it into 10+ minutes of overly | enthusiastic, slow-paced talking about it. | | The information density is at polar opposites of the | spectrum, and that's by design. YouTube favors quantity and | clickbait, and it's no secret that Linus is playing that | game as aggressively as he can. | newsclues wrote: | Wow, entertaining content is orders of magnitude more | popular and profitable than in depth analysis. | | Doesn't mean that entertainment doesn't benefit from | rigorous science and methodology. | freemint wrote: | Which LTT has been shown to be interested in producing, | buying cable testing equipment, using high speed cameras | for monitor analysis, ... and with LTT Labs those efforts | will likely increase. | thot_experiment wrote: | I mean very obviously you're comparing different media | aimed at different audiences but even so you're wrong, | there are plenty of LTT videos where they dive into their | methodology and provide explanations that are fairly in | depth. I think you should be blown away by the fact that | LTT manages to retain it's broad audience going as deep | as they do when it comes to stuff like testing thermals | under various conditions. I came into LTT thinking it was | clickbait trash but it's absolutely not, you have a long | way to go before you get to the "polar opposite of the | spectrum". | | In any case people are suggesting Ian join LTT Labs, not | LTT. | willis936 wrote: | This is what annoys me most about LTT: they have nuggets of | value in most videos, but they're buried under a mountain | of optimized dirt. | | It's cool to see them try a different format and hope they | succeed in bringing proper empirical-mindedness to the top | of the presentation. | user_7832 wrote: | I think you're quite misinformed about the situation. | | Linus has literally said that he doesn't like the clickbait | himself but it's almost essential to get decent views thanks | to YouTube's algorithms. It's true that a lot of their work | is more surface-level compared to AnandTech but that's just | partly because a. You need a lot of talent that they might | not have had, and b. They actually ARE expanding in that | direction. | | Side note: Tom Scott/Rohin Francis/Veritasium have also | started having more clickbaity video thumbnails. Do I blame | them? No, I blame YouTube. Don't forget, Linux has a huge | team he needs to pay and support. | Kye wrote: | Linus might be a showman, but I didn't see anything | inaccurate or uselessly shallow in the videos I watched. It's | not my style, but if the only complaint you have is | stylistic, it's not enough to dismiss the whole thing. | ivank wrote: | He has an entire video about cleaning keyboards that | consists of putting them in the dishwasher as a whole, PCB | included. There's no way that's ever a good idea because of | corrosion. | freemint wrote: | Yet the video shower that wasn't an issue and he gave | tips how to minimise corrosion anyway | Kye wrote: | This seems to be in agreement with what I said, but you | appear to have put it up as a counterexample. Showman | means entertainment. He's an entertainer. He _also_ seems | to be one of the rare entertainers who doesn 't fib for | greater entertainment value. The LTT labs thing linked | elsewhere suggests he cares about the technical side and, | like BuzzFeed News, wants to use entertainment to fund | more serious stuff. | | I don't see a problem here. The keyboard thing sounds | entertaining, so I'll go check it out. | Philip-J-Fry wrote: | They do a lot of low effort clickbait stuff, but that pays | the bills for them to do higher quality journalism. They have | done plenty of high quality reviews of new tech. | | Plus they have made a big investment into doing even more | advanced testing and reviewing. So I don't really agree that | they are "all-in". They do it because that's what makes | money, but Linus also wants his channel to be a place for | high quality journalism. | weaksauce wrote: | so was buzzfeed until they used that money to fund their | actual journalism. | mrweasel wrote: | People shouldn't fool themselves, Linus is running a | business, and the clickbait titles and thumbnails bring in | viewers. Linus even stated this in a video. | | I do think his heart is in the right place and his team is | able to produce high quality, both in terms of the content | and the production. If LTT is serious about LTT Labs, then | they need someone like Ian Cutress, and LTT is one of the few | place that would be able make him a genuine offer. | joshstrange wrote: | Agreed, I get annoyed with the over-the-top-ness of many of | his videos, even the podcast, but overall they do a decent | job of covering things. Clickbait titles/thumbnails are | unfortunately table stakes on YT and while I hate it I | can't bring myself to hate the player. LTT is far from | perfect and I certainly don't agree with him on everything | but I'd rank his content over quite a few other channels. | awiesenhofer wrote: | If he does I hope they also start a website for long form | articles. Just watching short highlight clips of whats | happening in the world of chips instead of reading his | detailed, in-depth articles and interviews about these complex | topics would be hell. | | Heck, even if they where hours long, some stuff is just better | suited to be read than watched. | apocalyptic0n3 wrote: | That is the plan. They're launching "LTT Labs" which will | focus on thoroughly testing products (I think they're aiming | to do what Steve at GamersNexus does) and moving toward | launching a written review and news site (I don't think he's | mentioned that name yet). | | Given the level of respect he's shown Cuttress in the past | and the timing, combined with how excited he's been on WAN | Show about the person he was finalizing a deal to hire to | lead these efforts, there's probably a decent chance Cuttress | is the hire. That's all speculation at this point, though. | sharken wrote: | Only just hearing about LTT Labs now, but it sounds like a | great idea. | | And i see no problem with LTT and their approach to | hardware, it is entertaining but make no mistake, that they | know what they are talking about. | | But let's see what LTT is up to. | Macha wrote: | He's been testing the waters with going independent for the | last couple of years with his tech tech potato channel, and has | collabed a lot with Wendell of Level1Techs which is a similarly | sized channel, so I'd see it as more likely he's going to try | go full time independent. Though it is always possible his | experiences have convinced him the other way and he tries to | join up with someone now. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | That was my first thought too. LTT has gotten really big and | Linus now has the money to pay for top editors and he's been | bantering with Dr. Cutress for a long time. | | It's kinda sad to watch all the big name editorials I used to | read as a teenager like Anandtech and Toms Hardware lost their | spark and are withering away, and LTT is now becoming the tech | review juggernaut. | geerlingguy wrote: | The key question is the balance between advertising revenue | and editorial independence. LTT seems to be walking that | tightrope a lot more than some other outlets do, but IMO I'd | rather see someone like GN take up the mantle from | Anandtech... alas it seems like they often cater more towards | gaming/enthusiast PCs in their work and aren't as broad as an | LTT or Anandtech in their coverage. | | I hope there will always be a place for Anandtech's and Tom's | Hardwares in this world, though. Text content with decent | illustrations can't be adequately replaced by video. | nisegami wrote: | >LTT seems to be walking that tightrope a lot more than | some other outlets do | | LTT's sponsored content is clearly marked and for videos | with an ad read, the writing staff isn't informed what | companies will get a spot in the video while writing. Seems | like pretty solid editorial independence to me? | freemint wrote: | Which is also explains why the Segways are so off the | cuff. | wheybags wrote: | The problem is that GNs videos are often kinda long and | boring. If i just want to know what's going on, I will | watch an ltt video. I only watch GN videos when I'm making | a purchasing decision. | FullyFunctional wrote: | I've said that repeatedly; the contents is good but it's | needlessly repeated throughout the videos. I feel most of | Steves review could be presented in half the time without | loosing much. And to be frank, most of the time there is | just too much details. | xbmcuser wrote: | LTT just gets 1/3 of its revenue directly from sponsors | because of the success of its merch store now so it is | getting more editorial independence. Though you really | can't alienate the tech companies if you want access to | tech before news emargos etc. | Kranar wrote: | From the tweet linked below [1], which sparked a lot of | controversy about the definition of piracy (which I | entirely disagree with Linus on), about 65% of their | revenue comes directly from sponsors and 32% comes from | merchandise. | | [1] | https://twitter.com/LinusTech/status/1486918784401088515 | xbmcuser wrote: | Just 35% comes from direct sponsors ie in-video sponsor | and sponsored projects. Apart from these 2 none of the | other categories would effect editorial independence. | tacLog wrote: | > 65% | | This just isn't what the tweet shows? Unless you are | counting AdSense as sponsors? That doesn't seems to make | sense. | | You seem to be saying LTT is beholden to their sponsors? | There is always an argument to be made there but | misrepresenting: floatplane, AdSense and other sources | that I don't see how you can call sponsors, which make up | another 33% seems very disingenuous. | | Unless I am misinformed about how AdSense works. | ksec wrote: | Yes. That was something I wanted to write in the 15 years of | HN thread but then decided to left it out. I was thinking if | there are any site that I have been visiting for more than 15 | years. And Anantech is the only one. I stopped reading The | Register and Tomshardware a long time ago. | | I dont mind LTT, the problem is just it is way too dumbed | down. It is part of the reason why Hardware discussions, even | on HN is pretty average to say the least. | | May be people just dont like reading long and detail review | but instead only want short form video. | tristor wrote: | Echoing others, I don't really respect LTT. They are more | entertainment than information or any real attempt at tech | journalism. On the other hand, Ian would be a great addition to | a group like Gamer's Nexus, which is more focused on | objectively testing technology products and diving into how | they are engineered and what trade-offs are being made and why. | gigatexal wrote: | Ugh I hope not. Linus is an annoying click bait uploader. Ian | should go Indy. | willis936 wrote: | Ian makes regular yt uploads on his channel: TechTechPotato. | systemvoltage wrote: | LTT is an entertainment channel. Completely different than | Anandtech, by a long shot. | reggegg wrote: | Their "LTT Labs" venture is supposed to be a mainly written | research/testing articles | thereddaikon wrote: | Not just that but they want to do independent validation | work. They have dipped into it a little on the main channel | already with cable and display testing but it seems they | intend to go much further. | gtm1260 wrote: | Oh man I wonder how long till we get companies paying for | 'LTT Labs approved' on their products. | systemvoltage wrote: | I wish Linus good luck, but I have a suspicion that it | won't be like Anandtech. May be I am biased by the image of | Linus and his crowd. I watched the Labs pitch, and it is | _very_ gamer oriented. | | I've been reading Anandtech for ~20 years. It has stayed | virtually the same [1]. Linus has turned his venture into a | giant media and entertainment house. I hope LTT labs is | completely different but it is hard to imagine it given | Linus' vision and business interests. | | [1] This aspect is basically unheard of these days. Hard to | find anything that stayed the same ~20 years, they refined | their vision instead of slowly destroying it. | schnebbau wrote: | Lots of people replying to this comment without actually | watching the video or understanding what LTT Labs is. | | LTT Labs is their attempt at producing more investigative and | informative content that is less rooted in entertainment like | their main channels are. | ribit wrote: | Anandtech has been one of my primary sources for quality tech | journalism and unbiased reviews, mostly thanks to the works of | Ian and Andrei. In the industry where folks report the TDP as | actual power consumption these guys were true beacons of | knowledge. Their articles will be sorely missed. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | Sad to see him go, although not entirely surprising. The site has | had minimal updates and very few interesting articles for a | while. | | Ian's articles were fantastic every time they came out, though. | Hopefully his next venture allows him to continue doing the same | work in another venue. | wronglebowski wrote: | Seconded, they seem to be getting less press samples or have | less manpower to write articles. I don't even think there's | more than two or three people working there anymore. | geerlingguy wrote: | FYI Ian has his own YouTube channel: | https://youtube.com/c/TechTechPotato | Katydid wrote: | Cheers to the best in the business, here's wishing Ian incredible | success. Thanks for so much great reporting and analysis over the | years. Few understand how challenging such a job is, having your | daily work product (which has to balance technical depth and | reader appeal) on stage for the world to grill, year in and out. | Ian nailed it with depth, energy, and humor. Can't wait to see | what's next from the good Dr. Cutress. - N | aucontraire wrote: | Where should one go now to get gory details in layman terms of | new CPU:s? | | Ian is my favourite CPU journalist. That insistence on reminding | everyone, all the time, that he has a doctorate is seriously | awkward, though. | bobbob1921 wrote: | STH (serveTheHome.com) | | LOVE that site..(and it's forums, and Patrick) | CoastalCoder wrote: | The "Gary Explains" channel on YouTube is pretty good imo. | | Not 100% the same topics, but still informative. | leetcrew wrote: | imo Steve at gamers nexus is the best substitute for the | objective, thorough coverage I used to get from anandtech. he | doesn't always dive quite as deep, but his coverage is very | prompt. his coverage is also a bit more consumer focused, so | you do miss some enterprise/DC hardware coverage that anandtech | might eventually get around to publishing. on the other hand, | he does some really good reviews on stuff like cases and | cooling that anandtech doesn't seem to have time for. | ksec wrote: | >That insistence on reminding everyone, all the time, that he | has a doctorate is seriously awkward, though. | | He didn't even use it until fairly recently. In the past 3-4 | years? I think he had his doctorate even before he joined | Anandtech. He only started using it because people were asking | him why he didn't put his Dr. in his title. | | And it means a lot in different context. Basically it could be | used as the biggest middle finger to marketing and PR | department to STFU and get a proper engineer to talk to me. | Especially in the context of foundry where his research was on | Electrochemistry. | IanCutress wrote: | I'd add that aside from my byline on AT, the only other | places I have the Dr. is on Twitter, and on my business card. | Everyone else introduces me that way. If they ask how to | introduce me, I say whatever works best. | | For some reason people equate this to me shoving it down | their throats. There was a big reddit thread about it | recently. | paulmd wrote: | > If they ask how to introduce me, I say whatever works | best. For some reason people equate this to me shoving it | down their throats. | | I don't know about "strong opinions in _both directions_ " | (I don't think I've ever met someone who felt strongly that | an academic doctorate title should never be mentioned?) but | there are certainly some people who are serious about | "ring-knocking" and will get super offended if you _don 't_ | say it, and given the 'do whatever' instruction, people may | be defaulting to putting it in, just in case. Perhaps, | again, not even out of fear you'll jump on them, as much as | someone else might. | | In other words, it might not be you so much as the other | assholes. | apurtbapurt wrote: | As a fan and random stranger from the Internet, your | Anandtech byline and twitter handle are how your public | persona introduces himself to me several times per months | over the course of multiple years. | | Your actual person I of course know nothing about and pass | neither judgement nor praise for. That is none of my | business! | ghaff wrote: | It's something about which some people have very strong | opinions in both directions. I do not have a strong opinion | personally. | wilsonjholmes wrote: | Might be a little bit of a rediculous request, but do you | have an image of your buisness card? I have begun to create | my own, and I am wondering what others' in tech look like. | IanCutress wrote: | My advice is to put your head shot on it. I have on mine. | Going to events and getting 100 business cards and not | remembering what people look like - but they all know | what I look like. | nazgulsenpai wrote: | His YouTube channel is quite good | | https://www.youtube.com/techtechpotato | M277 wrote: | There's Chips and Cheese[0], but not sure if "layman terms" is | accurate. They're really great, though. | | [0]: https://chipsandcheese.com/ ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-18 23:00 UTC)