[HN Gopher] Pyrite - open-source video conferencing ___________________________________________________________________ Pyrite - open-source video conferencing Author : jvanveen Score : 118 points Date : 2022-02-19 16:18 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (garage44.org) (TXT) w3m dump (garage44.org) | rcarmo wrote: | The most interesting thing for me is actually the galene server, | but playing around with the demo server and looking at the | documentation it seems to be a fair bit behind Jitsi in ease of | use and deployment. | | (I built a one-shot template to deploy and run Jitsi on Azure - | https://github.com/rcarmo/azure-ubuntu-jitsi - and it's been | trivial to maintain over the past two years, for a small group of | friends and monthly "open sessions") | | I'm not enamored of the Pyrite UI (again, Jitsi seems simpler), | but I'll keep an eye on both. | drudoo wrote: | Not really sure what this offers compared to Jitsi. The author | says Jitsi is complicated, but my company switched to onprem | jitsi at the start of covid and it's been a pretty smooth ride | (5000+ users). | fock wrote: | galene is a single GO-binary afaik. Jitsi needs and XMPP-server | installed. | jhugo wrote: | The separate components of Jitsi make it quite clean to scale | and customise though. A monolith doesn't seem superior except | for the very smallest deployments where simplicity is key. | Monotoko wrote: | I made quite a bit of money as a freelancer at the start of | covid setting up Jitsi servers for clients - it isn't | easy... especially when you start to have multiple servers | etc | throwaway81523 wrote: | Wait, this is written in Go? Nothing wrong with that, but why | is it called Pyrite which evokes that snakey language? | rgj wrote: | " I searched where the name Galene came from and learned | that it is a lead-containing mineral. It would only be | logical to name this side-project after another mineral. | Pyrite, or a fool's gold, felt to be a good description." | detaro wrote: | > _Pyrite is a web(RTC) client for the Galene | videoconference server._ | | So probably a play on the name of the parent project. | Sean-Der wrote: | I don't know Jitsi at all, but the things about Galene (and | Pyrite) I have enjoyed. | | * Low resource requirements. You can serve lots of users off a | Rasp Pi | | * Single binary + JSON Config. | | * Designed to be modified. Galene is API driven so you can ship | your own custom UI. I co-ran a conference a while back and | Galene let us give a custom experience easily. Users had no | idea what we were using on the backend, and we customized it | exactly to what we wanted. | | * Written in Go/Easy to understand. You can get into the guts | of Galene's jitter buffer etc.. pretty easily. Great for | learning and understanding the software you are running. | | * Maintainers are really accessible! Galene's developer runs a | mailing list and you get bounce ideas of him and some other | really smart people on it. | craigxyz wrote: | Are you using Jitsi meet or the lib? I've been trying to work | with the API to integrate into a solution and it hasn't been | pretty. | goldbattle wrote: | It would really help if the author had a list of "features" on | the github project. It is a bit difficult to figure out what | exact functionality the project supports. | | * https://github.com/garage44/pyrite/ | greazy wrote: | Something that is desperately missing from video conferencing | software is walkie-talkie-like interface and capabilities that | allow for stop-start convos. This might seem silly but it would | help tremendously for those in developing countries. | | Lots of our collaborators are in developing countries with | terrible internet, so we end up resorting to video chat + phone | call. | arsin wrote: | throwaway81523 wrote: | Besides this vs Jitsi, I wonder if there is a tldr about how Zoom | managed to capture so much of this space. | crubier wrote: | I think it's region and connection speed dependent, but for | several years I noticed that meetings with zoom had wayyyy less | problems with freezes, bad quality, audio drops and stuff when | compared to all other tools. | salmo wrote: | This has been my experience, even now. I still prefer it to | Teams and WebEx because of the reliability. | | I do like that Teams allows for a richer chat experience, but | often just keep a Teams chat and Zoom call going when needed. | james_in_the_uk wrote: | I've assumed that control over the end point client native | software allows them to focus on removing pain points. Codecs. | NAT traversal etc. | | Once a critical mass of users, big corporates etc. found their | solution easier, then they got the network effect. | detaro wrote: | It was free and easy to get started with, and worked. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-19 23:00 UTC)