[HN Gopher] Why did renewables become so cheap so fast? ___________________________________________________________________ Why did renewables become so cheap so fast? Author : bpierre Score : 36 points Date : 2022-02-26 21:28 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (ourworldindata.org) (TXT) w3m dump (ourworldindata.org) | Gravityloss wrote: | Quite a lot of repetition in the text. | | Why wouldn't the learning curve apply to nuclear power? There the | fuel cost is almost negligible. I think the large unit size | hampers learning - less iterations per decade. | [deleted] | pfdietz wrote: | Also, some of the parts are mature technology. We already built | lots of steam turbines before building them for nuclear plants. | [deleted] | aaron695 wrote: | edent wrote: | One interesting thing that I didn't see mentioned in the | (excellent) article - is that renewables allow for local and | hyper-local electricity generation. With any system, there will | be transmission loss. But when the solar panels are in the field | down the street, or on your roof, that becomes negligible. | | It also touches a little on the installation time. Nuclear power | stations takes years to build - even after the tortuous planning | process. Wind farms are quicker to install. A solar array is | almost instantaneous by comparison. The panels on my roof took a | week - and most of that was dealing with scaffolding and my dodgy | wiring. | | If you can install solar panels day-after-day, you benefit from | an increased learning rate. And, frankly, the training for how to | do it isn't arduous. Nuclear might be the future - but it | requires a highly trained workforce and constant maintenance. All | of which are expensive. | tonmoy wrote: | Electricity transmission costs are really negligible. You will | never be able to produce enough power just from solar panels on | your roof, and the cost and complexity of needing to maintain | and repair installations at each house may offset the | negligible gain obtained from getting rid of the transmission | loss | ianschmitz wrote: | There are plenty of people making enough power just from | solar panels on their roof. | | It doesn't work everywhere of course and requires some form | of storage or offsetting by powering the grid during the day. | tamaharbor wrote: | Unfortunately you wind up paying for your local system as | well as the grid backup. | tehsauce wrote: | Not if they are using electric air/water heating and | driving an electric car. | rayiner wrote: | This is a funny article considering that there's literally a war | going on where Germany has been hesitant to oppose Russia because | it's move to renewables left it highly dependent on Russian gas. | https://fortune.com/2022/02/25/ukraine-anger-sanctions-germa... | ManuelKiessling wrote: | Sorry, what? If we hadn't any renewables at all, we would be | even MORE dependent on Russian gas. | xyzzyz wrote: | Yes, if you had no renewables, but closed coal and nuclear | plant anyway, you'd be more dependent on Russian gas, sure. | Ygg2 wrote: | Yeah but shutting down nuclear power after Fukushima is akin | to jumping of a building in Germany, because these was a | tsunami in Jagan. | nautilius wrote: | Fukushima was the latest but hardly the only incident. One | of them caused fallout all across Europe. Hint: it was just | occupied by Russian forces. | Melio wrote: | Why? | | One thing has nothing to do with the other. | | Germany is pushing for renewable and has not transitioned to | it. | | It is depending on Russia for 30% or so in gas. It has this | problem because the transition is not done and Fukushima pushed | the faster end of nuclear power. | | Which is understandable when you remember Tschernobyl and how | dense populated Germany is. | | I drive by isar nuclear power plant by train since I remember. | While it looks interesting it's also frightening when you see | how little real knowledge or excercise anyone had when | Tschernobyl happened and when Fukushima happened. | tinco wrote: | Why do you mention Chernobyl and Fukushima together? | Fukushima basically only did some economic damage, Chernobyl | was a catastrophe. | | Also given how densely populated Germany is, it's wildly | irresponsible that they operate so many coal plants, it's | literally killing thousands every year. Even if they had a | Chernobyl style disaster every 10 years it would still be a | lot safer than the way they're generating power right now. | fivea wrote: | > Why do you mention Chernobyl and Fukushima together? | Fukushima basically only did some economic damage, | Chernobyl was a catastrophe. | | Both Chernobyl and Fukushima were disasters. | | It just so happened that Fukushima also was the final | straw. | Gravityloss wrote: | Germany has installed renewables, has shuttered nuclear power | and increased gas usage. | | If it had only installed renewables and also kept nuclear | power, the situation would be a lot better. | ipaddr wrote: | For greenhouse gas emissions and this situation with Russia | rootusrootus wrote: | Are you saying that Germany's situation, which seems to have | confounding factors, completely refutes the objective price of | different energy sources? | anarazel wrote: | The move to renewables in Germany slowed down drastically since | the mid 2010s. Largely due to bad policy, not cost development. | | In German, but look e.g. at the third graph in | https://www.wind-energie.de/themen/zahlen-und-fakten/deutsch... | . Shows the total and newly installed wind power (better than | the second graph showing the number of new turbines, because | turbines have gotten bigger). | | For solar, look at: | https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/29264/umfrage... | the numbers for 2020/2021 unfortunately are missing. They're | better, but by far not back to 2010-2012. | yodsanklai wrote: | How much would renewable cost if it wasn't supported by fossil | fuel (e.g. for extracting and processing the resources needed to | build solar panel)? | beebeepka wrote: | How much would fossil fuels cost if they weren't supported by | all kinds of horrible sacrifices we have to make? | | Pollution and wars sure are worth it! | rootusrootus wrote: | Does the analysis include those same costs in the fossil fuel | price? It takes a _lot_ of oil to find, extract, and process | oil. | fivea wrote: | > How much would renewable cost if it wasn't supported by | fossil fuel (e.g. for extracting and processing the resources | needed to build solar panel)? | | I find your comment pointless, given that in a not so distant | past the bulk of energy was produced from fossil fuel. | | Thankfully, the world is transitioning away from that, and at a | considerable speed. We went from propaganda selling the lie | that renewables were a passing fad to a point in time where | entire countries register days where all their energy needs | come from renewables and even overproduce energy, leading to | negative energy costs. | credit_guy wrote: | Here's the simplest way to get to net zero: solar, wind, | batteries, natural gas, then hydrogen. | | Solar and wind are cheap, but intermittent. Batteries can help | store energy from day to night. To help store energy from summer | to winter, they need to become 1000 times cheaper, which is not | going to happen. For that you need peaker plants. Initially | methane-based, later they can be converted to hydrogen. | | It's as simple as that. | fivea wrote: | > Solar and wind are cheap, but intermittent. Batteries can | help store energy from day to night. | | You don't need batteries per se, only energy storage systems. | | Pumped storage, pressurized air, flywheels, ultracapacitors, | and of course chemical batteries. Pumped storage and compressed | air systems store orders of magnitude more energy and power | than batteries. | ipaddr wrote: | Nuclear power can offer consistent base loads to power grids. | jdauriemma wrote: | Can someone ELI5 why renewables are more expensive for consumers | where I live? In Pennsylvania my electric utility allows me to | choose my supplier. Invariably, the renewables are more costly | than the fossil fuels. What gives? Is this just a regional | phenomenon? | gameswithgo wrote: | putting variable inputs like solar and wind on the grid makes | the grid more expensive to manage. | microdrum wrote: | Same reason internet bandwidth if more abundant and cheaper | than ever, but your Comcast bill seems to actually only go up. | | Local rooftop solar, with no reliance on utility monopolies, is | the most important thing in the global energy picture, and I'm | afraid it isn't even close. And I'm pro nuclear. But it's past | time to recognize that it's the distribution monopolists that | are the problem. Solar and batteries free you from that. | jdauriemma wrote: | Let's stipulate that I don't know why broadband bills are | getting more expensive, if you don't mind. | dwighttk wrote: | That is what 5 year olds around you understand? | [deleted] | xyzzyz wrote: | Renewables are cheap per kWh, but they are only intermittently | available, and since storage is basically nonexistent at grid | scale, these kWh are only worth anything if there is demand for | them, and are useless when there is demand, but sun is not | shining or wind is not blowing. In effect, you still need to | have some other way to produce electricity on demand, when | there is no renewable supply. What's worse is that if these | more flexible sources of electricity (typically coal or gas) | cannot compete with renewables when they do produce, they need | to charge much more when renewables are out, in order to stay | profitable -- otherwise, they'd close, and we'd wouldn't be | able to meet the demand at all times. This would result in | customers getting disconnected with very little notice, making | them very unhappy. | | To sum up, it's more expensive, because even as renewables grow | in installed capacity, we cannot reduce installed capacity of | fossil sources on 1-1 parity, and also we pay more per fossil | generated kWh than we used to in all-fossil grid. Cheap grid- | scale storage would solve this, but it's no going to happen any | time soon. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-26 23:00 UTC)