[HN Gopher] A Winner-Takes-All MMO-SAT ___________________________________________________________________ A Winner-Takes-All MMO-SAT Author : mtoner23 Score : 99 points Date : 2022-02-28 16:13 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (mschfboard.org) (TXT) w3m dump (mschfboard.org) | ecshafer wrote: | Its strange that MSCHF (Mischief) brands itself as an "art | collective". They don't really seem like an Art company so much | as just an advertising company. I posit the reasoning is to be | more hip. They have a CEO! If it were at least a workers | syndicate or something of that nature I would say its less of a | pointless branding. | jedimastert wrote: | For devil's advocate, you could say the same thing about Andy | Warhol. They explore aspects of American pop culture, and I | think a lot of their projects are really fun. | 6gvONxR4sf7o wrote: | One fun aspect of this is that it meets the legal bar for the | kind of contests that are pretty regulated. As such, they include | an extensive terms and conditions pdf, which happens to contain a | section on conduct and cheating. | | The tension between the T&Cs and the spirit of the contest is | delicious. | | So the main site and the spirit of the contest says "Everyone | will be cheating, and we don't care. Cheating is a legitimate | test-taking strategy." | | Meanwhile the terms includes all sorts of things, including | disallowing whatever the purveyors consider "unsportsmanlike" | conduct. The whole section is vague enough to be fun to think | about. (edit: removed the exact quote. it's long and didn't add | much) | | I certainly know where I would draw the line between the kind of | cheating allowed and the kind of cheating not allowed, but I | expect we'd find a wide variety of where even HN readers would | draw that line. | legalcorrection wrote: | Full context makes it a bit more clear. I don't think you can | reasonably argue this is an invitation to hack. But yeah, | interesting point. | | _" Unlike typical standardized tests, the MSAT is taken online | and in private. Everyone will be cheating, and we don't care. | Cheating is a legitimate test-taking strategy."_ | agentdrtran wrote: | I was disappointed to see MSCHF move from doing a lot of making | physical stuff to making mostly raffles/lotteries like this. | jedimastert wrote: | It's probably a lot harder/more expensive with the state of | supply chains and travel and quarantine right now. | | I imagine just designing at the pace they do is harder when | you're not in the same physical space | IHLayman wrote: | Can a model be trained in 4 days fast enough to score a perfect | on this, under cost? It becomes a weirdly positive feedback loop | if the pool keeps going up and up. | Firmwarrior wrote: | I'm looking forward to the test coming out, and a perfect score | being posted 5 seconds later | notpachet wrote: | As the spirit wanes, the standardized test appears. | ordinaryradical wrote: | I feel this comment isnt going to get a lot of love but appears | to be saying something interesting. Can you explain it further? | CobrastanJorji wrote: | It's an allusion to a Charles Bukowski poem called "Art": "As | the spirit wanes, the form appears." | whatshisface wrote: | The parent is saying that after the liquor runs out, cops | come by with breathalyzers. | _joel wrote: | You are in a darkened corridor... | pkage wrote: | This are the same group that made the "satan" Nikes with Lil Nas | X a few years ago[0], and the guy behind Wordle works there[1]. | | [0] https://www.cnn.com/style/article/lil-nas-x-mschf-satan- | nike... [1] https://powerlanguage.co.uk/ | amazd wrote: | nisegami wrote: | Bit off topic, but I had no idea Josh Wardle also did Place and | The Button at Reddit. | jedimastert wrote: | Holy bananas what a weird connection | nemo1618 wrote: | Given the provenance (MSCHF), I guess we can safely assume that | the..."unfortunate"...MschfBoard logo was fully intentional. | [deleted] | [deleted] | dragontamer wrote: | I was kinda hoping for some kind of live 3SAT solver competition. | | College-admissions SAT is still a good callout though, and | probably more relevant / memorable to more people. | jareklupinski wrote: | Got a free Saturday so I entered, wish me luck! | | Did pretty well on the actual SAT way back when, curious to see | how it changed. | | I'll be taking it with a buddy who will go through questions on | the computer, answer what they can, and yell out ones for me to | calculate or google on my laptop while they go on to do the rest, | then come back when I'm done. | | A two-way split is probably the most fun/profitable. | skulk wrote: | Given the "no-holds-barred, first-past-the-post" nature of this, | the winner will be a group of people who split the test and each | solved their part. | mattigames wrote: | They can avoid that if you have to answer the questions in | order one by one, without the possibility of going back to | previous questions. | gknoy wrote: | That would be hell. One of the best tactics I remember using | on the paper one was skipping things and coming back later. | Frost1x wrote: | Can't you just setup one sacrificial account to grab the | question pool, pass it out for distribution to solve, gather | it back up, then step through the question pool with the | solution set? Essentially they just collect the questions and | answer something knowing the run won't be a success. | | Unless these questions are sampled from a larger question | pool, a single registration sacrifice for Intel gathering | seems worth the cost. You can even distribute the loses to | your pool after. Worst case scenario your group loses the | admission fee + adminision fee/group size. | shmatt wrote: | This is the answer. | | * Sacrificial account crawls all the questions and puts | them in queue | | * Team members pull questions one by one - and push answers | back | | * Leader fills out answers as soon as the current one comes | in (assuming you can't jump backwards/forwards) | | As long as the people are good enough at these kinds of | tests, you'll win. It'll probably end up being a battle of | 10+ teams that work like this | jandrese wrote: | Maybe pulls a question and distributes it to the group, | everyone answers, leader chooses the most popular answer. | If you have to enter answers one at a time anyway there | isn't as much opportunity to parallelize the task. You | might get some win from the reading comprehension | questions, but even then being 100% right is priority #1, | as you can assume there will be multiple teams that get | perfect scores. | fallingknife wrote: | You will need some error checking though. There is no | trade off between accuracy and time here. Someone will | get a 1600 and then if your team misses one you lose. | Maybe each queued question goes to 3 people and unless | all agree it goes to everyone's queue for vote. | mysterydip wrote: | * leader runs away with the pot | zucker42 wrote: | How do you build such a system when there's no example of | how the website will be formatted? | lbotos wrote: | You have humans do the actual work, where computers are | just there for faster organization of human effort: | | an app with two queues: | | - those who input questions by copy and pasting them into | an app or transcribing them, or speech to text -- apple | offers all of these to iOS users in plain ol textboxes as | far as I'm aware. - those who solve by reading from the | app and submitting answers. | | Have N inputters getting all of the questions Have M | solvers solving | | This builds your answer bank. | | Have someone submit from the answer bank with a text | based search. | SteveDR wrote: | Definitely. But how will they split the 154 questions? The | prize pool is already big enough ($13k just a couple hours | after the announcement and 5 days before the registration | deadline) that 50 people could take it together and walk away | with $260 each. | zucker42 wrote: | Given that one question missed means you lose, you have to be | very careful to choose a good team. I've gotten a perfect score | on a standardized test (during high school) but while I know a | lot of smart people, I know no one who has also gotten a | perfect score. And it's hard to know how to quickly distribute | the test since the online format hasn't been released. | kevmo wrote: | I doubt it's going to actually be the SAT. | thomasahle wrote: | Has anyone tried to solve SATs with AI yet? | neonate wrote: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSCHF ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-02-28 23:00 UTC)