[HN Gopher] A deepening crisis forces physicists to rethink the ... ___________________________________________________________________ A deepening crisis forces physicists to rethink the structure of nature's laws Author : theafh Score : 54 points Date : 2022-03-01 16:20 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org) | brummm wrote: | There is a slight mistake in the article. The standard model does | not describe the neutrinos. In the standard model neutrinos are | massless particles, but in reality they are not. | [deleted] | peter303 wrote: | The muon was the first WhatTheF particle discovered from cosmic | rays. It and its associated quarks and leptons do not appear to | participate in any physics necessary for the observable universe | functioning. | | And the muon vexes us again with an observed g2 moment the | differs from its theoretical value greater than measurement | error. This again suggests there is more unknown physics out | there. | lumost wrote: | I strongly suspect that new high energy physics advances will | come from investigating astronomically generated phenomenon. | | - Gravitational Waves for probing extremely large and small | objects - Cosmic Rays for probing high energy particles. - | Solar probes to detect particles made from stellar phenomena | leashless wrote: | I think these datasets also point the way to some new | physics. | | https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/shane-harris- | interview-... | leashless wrote: | Although to get anything useful out of them would require | the _radar_ data, not just the optical data. Much more | certain positioning than optical cameras on fast moving | platforms. | bigbillheck wrote: | Depends on what you mean by 'observable'. Proton mass (for | example) depends in part on all 3 generations of quarks. | oraphalous wrote: | I wish they didn't use the term "crisis" for this. It's nothing | like the problems other disciplines are having with respect to | replication failure - where maybe the term is appropriate. | | Physics can still explain / predict a shit-load of phenomena. | It's not a crisis - just more work to do. | brummm wrote: | I mean, replication failures are a result of bad science, bad | analysis and a poor understanding of statistics in many cases. | It's not so much a crisis in the state of human knowledge but | the state of the education of the scientists in those other | disciplines. | naasking wrote: | It's a crisis because it's so widespread and the denial that | it's a problem is strong. | ordu wrote: | They refer to a crisis in a sense Thomas Kuhn used. The point | where paradigm shift is needed. Physics has experience with it. | General relativity theory was a paradigm shift following a | crisis. | ncmncm wrote: | I have been as derisive as anybody about string theory's entire | lack of experimentally realizable predictions. But some things | give me pause. The first is its interpretation of black holes as | existing entirely at the event horizon surface, with no actual | space-time inside; and the black hole entropy exactly matching | the set of states of strings living in the 2D horizon layer. | Eliminating that singularity is a big delivery. | | This seems like another case where it can deliver something | useful. | akvadrako wrote: | How does that depend on string theory? Also, what do you mean | by "string theory"? Do you mean M-theory? | Jerry2 wrote: | Prof. Sabine Hossenfelder has a great article on the lack of | progress in fundamentals of physics: " _The present phase of | stagnation in the foundations of physics is not normal_ " [1] | | Choice quotes: | | > _We know this both because dark matter is merely a placeholder | for something we don't understand, and because the mathematical | formulation of particle physics is incompatible with the math we | use for gravity. Physicists knew about these two problems already | in 1930s. And until the 1970s, they made great progress. But | since then, theory development in the foundations of physics has | stalled. If experiments find anything new now, that will be | despite, not because of, some ten-thousands of wrong | predictions._ | | > _Ten-thousands of wrong predictions sounds dramatic, but it's | actually an underestimate. I am merely summing up predictions | that have been made for physics beyond the standard model which | the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was supposed to find: All the | extra dimensions in their multiple shapes and configurations, all | the pretty symmetry groups, all the new particles with the fancy | names. You can estimate the total number of such predictions by | counting the papers, or, alternatively, the people working in the | fields and their average productivity._ | | According to her, and many other physicists, there hasn't been | any major progress in phenomenology since 1970s when Higgs boson | was postulated. | | [1] https://backreaction.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-present- | phase-... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-01 23:00 UTC)