[HN Gopher] Amazon to close all of its physical bookstores and '... ___________________________________________________________________ Amazon to close all of its physical bookstores and '4-star' shops Author : leephillips Score : 177 points Date : 2022-03-02 19:31 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.reuters.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.reuters.com) | brownbag wrote: | This is really amazing news | xanaxagoras wrote: | I guess they got tired of closing other people's physical | bookstores! | stevenally wrote: | There were none left.... | CrazedGeek wrote: | Shame, I liked the 4-star in Westfield Topanga. Nice selection of | stuff in a pretty small space. | rednerrus wrote: | The physical bookstore is great. | helsinkiandrew wrote: | I never understood these stores. Worth a visit if passing and | have time to see what they have or if your looking for a present | for someone and don't know what to get. But I've never woken up | and thought I need a four star product. The selection | (particularly books) is too wide and shallow to be worth | browsing. | peter303 wrote: | Both the bookstores and 4-star appeared cluttered- a mixture of | all kinds of stuff. And ordered by popularity, not by kind. | paxys wrote: | It was a weird model. As close to a physical manifestation of the | front page of Amazon.com as you can get, which doesn't really | translate very well to the retail experience people are used to. | Like, I have never in my life randomly gone to Amazon, browsed | around their site, clicked through different categories, found | something I liked and bought it. Their entire experience starts | and ends at the search bar, and that's impossible to replicate in | the physical world. | | It will be interesting to see how their grocery and convenience | stores fare. I have some Amazon Go stores nearby and they never | seem too busy. | marssaxman wrote: | Assuming that "Amazon Go" is the mini store with no cashiers, I | used to get lunch there sometimes before the pandemic. Worked | well, was a good experience. The email receipt would tell you | how many minutes and seconds you'd spent in the store; it was | trivially easy to get in and out in less than 2 minutes without | trying to rush at all. | yreg wrote: | > I have never in my life randomly gone to Amazon, browsed | around their site, clicked through different categories, found | something I liked and bought it. | | Guilty as charged on consumerism front, but I do exactly this | on black fridays. | cbhl wrote: | This seems like the opposite for me... every time I've walked | into an Amazon Books I've found at least one thing that I've | wanted to buy | | So much easier than hunting through a Barnes and Noble or doom- | scrolling through online listings | ChildOfChaos wrote: | I get you, but this is not the experience they are trying to | recreate, they are trying to recreate the very experience you | said the website is lacking by using the algorithm and data | from there online sales to decide what it should sell in the | first place. | codeduck wrote: | I can quite easily reproduce the Amazon search bar by walking | into a local high street pound shop. Their search is incredibly | poor, skewing strongly towards promoted, clone or amazon | brands. It's rare that i can find what I'm looking for without | getting creative. | dwighttk wrote: | Yeah but do you get "I see you have begun a collection of | every pair of headphones ever made, would you like to add | these three pairs to your cart to round out your purchase?" | kwertyoowiyop wrote: | I dread watching random videos on YouTube for the same | reason. No, I have not suddenly kindled an ongoing interest | in unclogging sinks! And I just wanted to see that one | Billie Eilish song my kid mentioned...and no more! | actually_a_dog wrote: | Yeah, I never got how that was supposed to work, exactly. | Like, if I just bought a TV, I'm probably not going to buy | another one for a while, so, don't keep showing me all the | TVs I didn't buy. At least show me stuff like sound bars, | mounting hardware, TV stands, _etc._ Even with consumables, | where it makes sense to show me literally the exact same | thing I just bought, maybe wait a while until those things | might have actually been, you know, _consumed_? | | As always, I'm sure the explanation for why their search | engine and recommendations are so bad is either that they | don't think it would make them enough more money to be | worth it to improve them. An even more sinister thought | would be that they think it would make them _less_ money to | give consumers better recommendations. I 'm not sure which | it is, TBH. | LordDragonfang wrote: | With how painless Amazon generally makes returns for | regular customers, I could see it being a viable | alternative to in-person browsing for one to buy several | different brands of item and just return all but the | least cheap-feeling one | quesera wrote: | > Like, if I just bought a TV, I'm probably not going to | buy another one for a while, so, don't keep showing me | all the TVs I didn't buy. | | Counterintuitively, you're wrong about this! | | Some astronomical number of Amazon purchases are | returned. Like 10 or 15%. So anyone who has just bought a | TV is extremely likely (compared to the ambient) to be | buying a TV right now. | | It's algorithms all the way down. | bb123 wrote: | Argos in the U.K. replicates this pretty well | tialaramex wrote: | Just in case people have never seen this business, they've | got a _lot_ of stuff but it 's all on racks accessible only | to employees. For customers the experience is there are a lot | of catalogs (these days electronic) listing everything they | have, you pick what you want (now just touching it on the | screen, but historically you write a number on a form) and | then you go see a member of staff, they take your payment and | meanwhile your items are fetched from the stores. The | catalogs are also available to take home (and these days | they're a web site). | | The biggest difference to Amazon is after I pick that I want | an HDMI cable, a garden trowel and a high temperature | incandescent bulb for an oven, it says ready to pick up in 5 | minutes and I can walk to the store (five minutes) and get it | with no delivery surcharge. Also I could pay cash (but I | don't). | | Obviously if you live 2+ hours from an Argos, Amazon is | starting to look more competitive, but in the UK who lives | two hours from an Argos? I don't buy much from Amazon. | madrox wrote: | At first I was surprised that these stores had survived this | long, and then I remembered these were probably great write-offs | to have around when the real goal was probably data collection on | how people navigated certain kinds of physical stores. Amazon is | great at paying no tax because it has a lot of operations that on | the surface lose a lot of money but whose real purpose is to | funnel data into other, more successful projects. I wouldn't be | surprised if that's the fate of Whole Foods in the long run. | codq wrote: | Last weekend, I ordered a Nintendo Switch OLED from my apartment | in NYC, and picked it up at the 4-Star store in SOHO less than 30 | minutes later. | | It was an awesome experience, and I'm sad that this might be the | last time I get _immediate_ service like that from Amazon. | kasperni wrote: | We have an Amazon Hairdresser here in East London (Spitalfields). | Don't think I've ever seen anyone in there. | hammock wrote: | Whoa. Here's more info https://blog.aboutamazon.co.uk/shopping- | and-entertainment/in... | | Seems like a way to show off the AR capabilities Amazon is | working on. Secondarily, many haircare products are only sold | in salons and this effort could eventually be a way around | those restrictions. | gigatexal wrote: | That sucks for both the workers and the customers. I really | enjoyed being able to go in and discover a book and then get a | good discount based on my prime membership. | 2-718-281-828 wrote: | could this be the extinguish step of embrace, extend, extinguish? | registeredcorn wrote: | I'm not exactly _happy_ to hear this, but I 'm also not at all | surprised. | | After reading through some of the comments here, apparently the | thing that I went to was some kind of Amazon mall "kiosk", not a | proper store. Whatever it was that I went to, it was just | incredibly creepy. It was just a bunch of kindles and Alexa's | crammed into this little area, with no one around, hidden away in | a weird area of the mall. | | I imagine it was supposed to have "go" associated to it in some | way? There was no information I saw anywhere indicating how any | of it was supposed to work. I didn't any sort of cash register or | obvious spot where an employee would be. The whole thing was | really just gross. It felt like, if you were to see a purse in | the middle of the street with fists full of dollar bills sticking | out of it with no one around. It's like someone put it there, | specifically with the intention of them _wanting_ you to take it. | It 's like it's accusing you. | | It was this disgusting sensation of being monitored in a way that | was outright nauseating. I can't really describe it. If you've | ever gone to a gas station or some other place, and are trying to | pay for something, and the cashier comes out 5 to 10 minutes | later from the bathroom, it was kind of like that, but without | the relief of seeing a human after a few minutes. Now picture | that, but in a small square space without walls, or signs of | life. It's like no one's been there in months. That's what that | location felt like. | | Anyway, if these Amazon stores were anything like that, I'm | hardly surprised they didn't do so well. I'm not a huge fan of | the idea of being treated like a criminal, just by entering a | store. | | The names sound like they could have used some serious | rethinking, too. My first assumption after hearing the term | Amazon "4-star" is that it's not supposed to be very good. 5 | stars is good, so if it's only 4 it's low quality products only. | Was it meant to be a "high end" dollar store? If so, why wouldn't | I just go to the dollar store instead? | | I'm sure they have their reasons, I'm not vain enough to think | I'm smarter than the people who made these decisions, but I can't | imagine why they bothered, or if in doing so, why they made such | weird decisions. | atourgates wrote: | Amazon's bookstores were ... odd. | | They helped me realize that what I value about going to a good | independent bookstore is curation. Not "highest rated" or "most | popular" - but books I wouldn't get otherwise exposed to that an | employee has selected to carry, and display. | | That and local-interest connections to the place the bookshop is | located. | | Amazon's bookstores looked very much like a good independent | bookstore (well, if you take away all the Ring Doorbells and | stuff), but lacked that essential ingredient. Everything was just | based on some "best seller" list for a specific category. | | If I already know what I want, Amazon is a really easy place to | get it. If I'm casually browsing, both Amazon.com and Amazon's | physical bookstores were really bad at helping me discover | something new that I'm interested in. | | I'm physically incapable of visiting a good independent bookstore | without buying something. Often far too much of something. It's | an expensive disorder I have. I think the last time I walked into | Elliott Bay Books with no intention of buying anything, I walked | out about $300 poorer. | | I've probably stopped in to Amazon's bookstore at University | Village in Seattle about a dozen times since it opened. I only | ever bought something once. A charging cable. | sdoering wrote: | > I'm physically incapable of visiting a good independent | bookstore without buying something. | | I'll join the club. | | In Japanese, there's a word for it: tsundoku. It describes a | person who buys books and mostly doesn't read them. | | Often they pile up on the floor, on shelves, and assorted | pieces of furniture. | | Virtually my Audible resembles this. | ok_dad wrote: | I bought an electric kettle once from an Amazon Bookstore, but | that was it. I may have bought a coffee once or twice. Like | you, I walked in about 20 times previously. | CobrastanJorji wrote: | I absolutely loved the University Village Amazon bookstore. | I've got a big list of reasons why. First of all, there was no | need to absolutely pack the books. Each book was displayed | cover out, with some space around it, with maybe an endorsement | or a bit of a review under it. It made it easy to discover | interesting stuff simply by looking around. As a sci fi nerd, | I'm used to the sci fi section being a bunch of paperbacks | squished together floor to ceiling with just a vague title and | an author name facing me. This was a huge step up. I found more | than one new book there, and knowing that I'd get the Amazon | price for it when I checked out made purchasing it and walking | out an easy call (unlike at another bookstore, where for a new | release I would've had to choose between getting it today or | getting it 30% off the "list price" on Amazon). | | That said, the whole reason this works as a store design is | that the store has no particular motivation to have a big back | catalog. If they don't have it, you're just gonna go get it on | Amazon, so they haven't lost a sale anyway. | | The store did get worse over time, though. More and more of the | floor space became focused on selling a bunch of stuff that | worked with Alexa. Stop it. You're not an Apple Store. Just be | a book store. And as much as the book selection was pretty | great to me the first few times I went in, when I stopped in a | year later and the book selections were mostly the same, it was | a lot less great. | weeblewobble wrote: | yes, I'll +1 this. The Amazon Bookstore at U Village is | (was?) great. Super helpful staff, roomy, good | curations/recommendations, and way way cheaper than | independent bookstores. I'll miss it | paganel wrote: | > Often far too much of something. It's an expensive disorder I | have. | | We should form a support club or something, I'm the same as you | even though I live half-way around the globe. Something tells | me we're not the only ones. | TillE wrote: | The annoying thing is that this is basically all replicable | online, except Amazon has apparently never even tried. | | Like, say I'm interested in 14th-15th century European history, | maybe I have a couple good books already that I know. You could | go to a university library and look them up on the shelves, and | find a wealth of related books near them. Amazon won't even | give you that level of browsing by library classification, | using data which already exists. They have the same half-assed | recommendation system which seems to have barely changed in the | past 15-20 years. | qbasic_forever wrote: | Amazon used to do a lot in that space, they had a big focus | on customers creating and sharing lists of products. Your | list was almost a blog post where you could write | descriptions of each item and why they were there, order | them, etc. I remember in the mid-2000s these lists were some | of the best ways to find good books and products--there were | always great "here's a roundup of the best technical books | for programming language X/Y/Z" lists that I would seek out | for example. | | It looks like there's much less focus on Amazon lists these | days. Maybe they got rid of it entirely--it's hard to tell, | all I can find are wish lists and such now. | qbasic_forever wrote: | When I visited Amazon's book stores they always had little end | caps with curated selections of books. Employee picks, | celebrities like Michelle Obama or Oprah Winfrey reading lists, | etc. I agree independent stores have a lot more character but | Amazon's store wasn't just a cold, sterile pile of books that | an algorithm picked. | deckard1 wrote: | Human curation is something that is definitely missing these | days and was severely undervalued with the growth of the | internet. I rarely conduct a Google search without appending | "reddit" to the query. Because I know I want actual human | answers. We are, ironically, using Google today as if it were | the Yahoo! curated catalog of 1997. Because we can't trust that | the links Google returns aren't some autogenerated SEO-driven | affiliate link garbage. | | The same applies to music. Spotify is missing that certain | ingredient that local radios (before they were sold and | cannibalized by Clear Channel/iHeartMedia) and early 1980s MTV | really nailed. We want a knowledgeable human to guide us | through the landscape of books, music, film, and everything | else. | | > Not "highest rated" or "most popular" - but books I wouldn't | get otherwise exposed to that an employee has selected carry, | and display. | | In the past few years Netflix introduced their "Top 10" feature | which is prominent near the top of their app. This was _the_ | reason I unsubscribed from Netflix. I had been a member since | 2004. The "Top 10" feature reminded me on a daily basis that I | have no interest in the content Netflix has. Previously I had | assumed (because of their rather horrible discovery mechanisms) | that Netflix had a much deeper catalog and I could find | something to watch if I keep searching. The top 10 list made me | finally realize their offerings simply were bad. The value of | the service wasn't there. | bwb wrote: | I am trying to fix this with book browsing online, try | shepherd.com and let me know (ben@shepherd.com). I go to | authors and ask them to share 5 books around a topic/them | they are passionate experts in, and then i try to connect it | in different ways to make browsing fun :) | | Only 10 months old and trying to integrate genre now... | wizzwizz4 wrote: | I'm sure you already know this, but "genre" boundaries are | fuzzy. (Some people refute the concept entirely, which I | think is a bit silly.) There are several different ways to | define each genre. If you can do some magic with your genre | data that lets me sort some books into what I think of as | genre classifications (say, if I consider Star Wars a | fantasy work), then automagically lets me filter by that... | Not sure how useful, or possible, that actually is, but it | seemed like a good idea when I started writing the comment. | | Apart from thinking that Minecraft was set in Washington | D.C., it gave _multiple_ good-seeming suggestions for all | the random topics I thought to put into it. That 's pretty | impressive, especially given (or, perhaps, _because_ ) your | data is manually curated. Have you considered supporting | Bookwyrm-flavoured ActivityPub, for (potentially curated) | reviews? | Enginerrrd wrote: | Dude... This is really good! If I wasn't on the most | limited budget I've ever been on, I would have just bought | like 3 books without even blinking. | | I don't know how you managed to get such a large list of | bookshelves already, but I'm impressed. | com2kid wrote: | > Spotify is missing that certain ingredient that local | radios | | This was orignaly Pandora's big selling point. | | Every track sent to them was analyzed by someone with a | degree in music to help build a recommendation engine. It was | a combination of algorithms and people. | | I am not sure how well that scaled or if they still do that, | for the longest time Pandora had a tiny selection of music | and I presume the reason was their intake process. | chipotle_coyote wrote: | > Spotify is missing that certain ingredient that local | radios (before they were sold and cannibalized by Clear | Channel/iHeartMedia) and early 1980s MTV really nailed. | | This is interesting to me, as someone who's played with | Spotify and Tidal but mostly stuck with Apple Music. In part | I think this is inertia -- if you stick with any of these | streaming services for more than, say, half a year, then it's | probably not worth switching unless there's a _really_ | compelling reason -- but all three of the services have both | human-curated playlists and algorithmically generated ones, | and it seems to me that Apple Music has the best curated | playlists of any of those three. Spotify has the best | algorithmically generated playlists of all three, but I find | the best discovery trick for me is to let Apple 's algorithms | recommend curated playlists. :) | | (Tidal, at least when I was last a regular user, was | genuinely bad at algorithmically generated playlists and | pretty mediocre with their curated ones. I'm not really sure | what their unique strengths are beyond being willing to | deeply integrate with virtually everyone and offering streams | with MQA, which is basically a lossy hi-res format.) | WalterBright wrote: | I'm glad I was able to satisfy my movie bucket list when | Netflix still had a large catalog of DVDs. | | Netflix today also has weird gaps, like if a show had 5 | seasons, Netflix only has seasons 2 and 3 available. | MiddleEndian wrote: | The Netflix DVD recommendation system was fantastic. | Massive selection of films, rankings based on what you | liked, nothing seemed to be actively pushed at you. I | certainly liked it better than the way they have their | streaming site laid out. | nogridbag wrote: | As someone who only reads technical books I enjoy the Amazon | bookstore but primarily for books for my kids. Barnes and | Noble's kids book section can be overwhelming. The Amazon | Bookstore is smaller in scope and I can quickly grab a few | popular books to filter through. For the same reason I like | buying kids books directly from scholastic books website. | They're pre-filtered for popular books at the right age/reading | level. | DoneWithAllThat wrote: | In the 90s, I credit a huge amount of my love and appreciation | for electronica to the folks at my nearby Tower Records. That | single store, with a single listening station in the Electronic | Music section, holding only 6 CDs, exposed me to music I never | would have heard before. It wasn't anything from the Billboard | 100 or top streams on Spotify, it was just what some local | electronic music nerds thought was new and cool and I am | forever grateful to them for what they decided to share, as | well as desperately mournful that I'll never have that kind of | experience again. | WalterBright wrote: | The best independent bookstore I know of are the thrift stores. | I find all kinds of unusual books there, and best of all, | they're dirt cheap so if they don't work out, I just donate | them back :-) | [deleted] | jfengel wrote: | There's a joke: "Escape room idea: Just a well-stocked | bookstore with clearly marked exits. You have one hour to get | out. Good luck." | | Elliott Bay Books exemplifies that meme better than almost any | place in the world. Not only does it do an almost preternatural | job of putting books you might like in front of your face, but | it's a literal warren that can be tricky to escape from after | you've finally woken from your book-induced reverie. | bokchoi wrote: | Or Powell's in Portland. That place is a maze and it's fun | getting lost. | glfharris wrote: | This is partly what's driven me to second hand/charity | bookshops. | | No, they don't have exactly the book I've been looking for. But | occasionally they have absolute gems that I'd never have found | independently. | mikepurvis wrote: | I wonder if this is why I've never found much joy in browsing | at chain bookstores (Indigo, in Canada). It's all just | bestsellers, and half the products aren't even books, they're | like kitchy home-decor items, candles, blankets, cozy "reading" | pajamas and whatnot. I guess it's lures intended to stimulate | impulse purchases out of people who already know they're not | going to read anything they buy anyway. | | Whereas you go to the indie store and there's an entire shelf | in the back dedicated to heraldry, seemingly for no other | reason than that it's an area of acute personal interest for | the proprietor. | mabbo wrote: | A long time ago, I was a dev in Amazon's fulfillment org, and one | day a lot of very smart people disappeared. The guy who had done | some incredible pioneering work in computer vision for the | warehouses; the only principal engineer the org had at the time; | and a bunch of other people I know that we're just really clever | people. And they joined an org called "JIHM". What's JIHM? | They'll only tell you if you join. But it's going to be really | cool. (I was in Toronto so I couldn't join- Seattle only). | | What I knew: these particular people had left for this project. | The head of it was the guy who had lead the Kindle project- he | had rejoined Amazon allegedly because Jeff asked him to lead this | project. And for whatever reason, this JIHM org had all these new | physical book store managers reporting up to them. | | Over lunch one day, I proposed a theory to my coworker: "they're | going to make that IBM commercial from the 90s, where the sketchy | dude grabs a bunch of stuff and puts it in his pockets, then just | walks out the door and gets a receipt". It was a fun idea, and | given the CV people they had pulled it may have even made sense. | "What about the book stores?" My friend asked "It's a smoke | screen. That same guy leading JIHM is legendary for leaking false | reports that Amazon was going to build a PC to cover him hiring | hardware engineer for the Kindle." | | 6 months later, Amazon Go with it's 'Just Walk Out' technology | was publicly announced. The CV guy I knew was even in the | commercial ("Holy shit, is that Danny?!"). | | Maybe this is the final conclusion that those stores were just a | cover. | | (Caveat: this is all wild speculation, rumours, and probably bad | memory on my part, but it's a great story and I swear it's all | true!) | qwerpy wrote: | I had a very similar experience there. A mysterious 4 letter | acronym that made no sense even if you knew what it stood for. | "Multi-billion dollar market!". Wouldn't tell me what it was | until I joined. Above average team from internal transfers | ("our hiring standards are way above Amazon's regular bar!") | and external hires. I even got smugly booted from a team | meeting where I had presented some code I had written, after | some SDE 2 realized I hadn't yet signed the NDA or whatever. | | It ended up being Kindle ads for Amazon Local, the now defunct | Groupon clone. So anti-climactic after all the cloak and | daggers theatrics. At least Amazon Go is a much bigger deal | with interesting tech behind it. | morganslaw wrote: | Is Amazon Go stores sticking around? It is confusing when they | say "all physical stores" are closing, but even the Amazon Go | ones? | [deleted] | meowkit wrote: | Amazon Go is being absorbed/rebranded under Amazon Fresh, | which is supposedly like Whole Foods lite/their delivery | service. | | Might be wrong, this is just my observation in SEA/what I | recall. | WalterBright wrote: | > Amazon Go is being absorbed | | Resistance is futile. | mikepurvis wrote: | I was an intern at Amazon in Seattle _in 2008_ and was | ordering groceries and beer from Fresh. It looks like it 's | a pretty big deal now in most major US cities, but I | remember being surprised that year after year after year it | seemed to just.... continue existing. Not going huge, but | also not getting canned. | | On the other hand, maybe that's the real lesson of Grocery | Gateway and "dot coms" who tried to do a hard burn on this | back in the day-- it's a really hard thing to get right, | and getting it right requires an extremely long horizon of | slow and steady growth. | strulovich wrote: | Looks like they might go away as Amazon merges the technology | into Whole Foods: | | https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/technology/whole-foods- | am... | | (Sorry for paywalled article) | uejfiweun wrote: | That's an interesting story, thanks for sharing. It strikes me | that when Amazon decides to commit to a product, they rarely | fail. They've had success in innovating with Alexa, AWS, | Kindle, etc. So hopefully they will have similar success with | this tech, and hopefully it will be sold to third parties. I | think the post-checkout future sounds awesome and convenient, | and I look forward to it. | vidarh wrote: | The post checkout future is delivery from robotic warehouses | with ordering systems that predicts your weekly shop. I have | hardly been to a grocery store for years, and some weeks I | don't bother logging in to adjust my order. | colinmhayes wrote: | Why would they buy whole foods if they're just going to sell | their competitive advantage to their competitors? | MathCodeLove wrote: | Why would they invest in such great infrastructure for | amazon.com if they're just going to sell that | infrastructure to competitors? | colinmhayes wrote: | Because they make more money selling ads than they do | selling their own products? Can't sell the ads unless | merchants are using the marketplace though. Whole foods | isn't necessary to sell the camera tech to competitors. | Uehreka wrote: | Is _that_ even true though? I thought they frequently | copied merchants' products as Amazon Basics if they were | selling well? Because if that's true, it means they'd | rather have the business themselves than advertise for | someone else (at least in some categories). | silisili wrote: | Thanks for sharing. Any inclination on what JIHM actually | stood/stands for? | wizzwizz4 wrote: | JIHM is JIHM's interesting hidden meaning. | | (not true) | elephantgambit wrote: | A combination of the closing stores' code names (neither | relate to the actual projects very much). | apendleton wrote: | It wouldn't have occurred to me to go into one of these stores to | buy an actual book, but I will say I appreciated having a no- | advanced-planning-needed way to get a $4 HDMI cable or | rechargeable batteries, or whatever other things regular | electronics stores usually mark way up because customers have no | other choice. Maybe now that so much of this is available same- | day for free from online-Amazon, that's less compelling? | hughrr wrote: | Good. The one at Westfield was a shit show of nothing useful. | calrueb wrote: | I'm no fan of Amazon, but I did walk through the 4-star shop in | Mall of America while Christmas shopping last year, and I liked | it. I thought it was a cool space, filled to the brim with | various interesting oddities. There was a long line to get in | (partially due to COVID reasons), but it seemed very popular. | booleandilemma wrote: | Ah well. I'm going to miss the 34th street bookstore. | kayodelycaon wrote: | Huh. I didn't know Amazon had physical bookstores. | fermentation wrote: | They had covers facing forwards, which made it incredibly | exhausting to browse due to overstimulation. | coffeefirst wrote: | The side effect of that is they had a much narrower selection | than a typical bookstore of that size. | | It was pretty weird. | stagger87 wrote: | Yes, and they were quite fun to browse. They were laid out in a | way that books next to each other would be "recommended" for | each other. In that way, you would often find a group of books | that were interesting to you. | | As others said, it was covers out, which in my opinion only had | the downside of having limited shelf space. | Spooky23 wrote: | That's too bad. The 4star shop near me is actually pretty good. | | The foot traffic seemed to be about people returning stuff and | then converting to customers of random stuff. | badRNG wrote: | This shouldn't be confused with the retail locations currently | pushing to unionize | | https://www.businessinsider.com/workers-first-union-push-at-... | benbenolson wrote: | That's talking about the grocery stores, though, and the post | is about the bookstores and 4-star stores. | badRNG wrote: | That's...that's literally the point my comment made | z3c0 wrote: | Violent agreement, as they say. | | I've been noticing this more and more lately, and it makes | me curious as to whether there's any research into the | psychology behind contradictions. | showerst wrote: | That's a shame, I liked their "covers out" model, and they often | had a reasonably stocked tech book shelf, which is something | indie bookstores never really do well. | davidw wrote: | > tech book shelf, which is something indie bookstores never | really do well. | | RIP the Powell's technical book store. It was a very large book | store with only technical books. I spent many a happy hour | poking around and finding interesting books. | stagger87 wrote: | The top floor of Powell's now has a large technical section, | but it's not quite a replacement. | divbzero wrote: | I liked it too. The best bookstores are good for their curation | and Amazon Books did a reasonable job at it. | gtm1260 wrote: | Bummer! The bookstores are pretty nice, and the 4-star shops were | so useful for the bizarre, algorithmically curated collection of | product they contained. I remember pre-pandemic, I needed a ir | thermometer and a gift wrapped coffee table book, randomly popped | into my local 4-star (soho) and it had everything. | philip1209 wrote: | The name "4-star" still confuses me so much. It signals to me | "mediocre - not quite 5-star". | | I realize they meant it as "everything 4 stars and above", but . | . . | Flux159 wrote: | I wonder what the internal data showed on these stores - from | what I remember, these stores mostly had kindle devices and some | selection of books which you could more easily get online. | | Someone probably realized that Amazon Go & Whole Foods were | better for foot traffic (since they sell groceries & other items) | and investing more into selling Amazon Go walk out tech would be | a better expansion plan than their own stores. | AdmiralAsshat wrote: | I don't think I ever saw one of their bookstores, but I do | remember passing by one or two Amazon kiosks at a mall. All | they really sold there were some Amazon hardware like Kindle, | Kindle Fire, Alexa, or Fire TV boxes. | | I didn't really see the point, given that some places like Wal- | Mart or Best Buy already have display models you can play with. | Animats wrote: | I wonder if Whole Foods will go. It seems they've been | downsizing staff and accepting longer checkout lines. No more | "N items or less" line, and the self-service checkout is still | barcode-oriented, not Amazon Go technology. Meanwhile, I see | huge numbers of Amazon vans driving around. | np- wrote: | That's probably just due to normal staff retention issues | that everywhere seems to be experiencing right now. There are | still plenty of brand new Whole Foods popping up, plus the | Amazon Go technology has just begun to become integrated as | of just a few days ago. | actually_a_dog wrote: | Isn't that just the general trend with grocery stores in | general (long lines)? I don't know about eliminating express | lanes, but I don't know how many years it's been since I've | been in a grocery store and seen most of the lanes being | staffed, even at peak times. It seems like they'd rather run | 2 lanes out of 8, plus the self checkout, rather than even | temporarily open up a couple extra lanes to clear out long | lines. | colinmhayes wrote: | Amazon is rolling out the just walk out technology in whole | foods stores. Only a couple have it now, but I imagine it | won't be long until the rest do too. | torbTurret wrote: | Don't see any comments mentioning inflation, but I'd assume that | wavering consumer participation is a factor. | 0x0000000 wrote: | I went to one of the "four star shops" around the winter holidays | looking for gifts, but left empty handed. It _felt_ like it was | all the crap they wanted to push, almost like the store itself is | an advertisement space. It was the first and last time I 'd been, | so personally I'm not surprised to hear these are closing. | Tagbert wrote: | Isn't that what any store is? What the store wants to push | (based on what they think people will want). If you didn't see | anything you wanted it may just be that you are not the target | market. That is true of many stores. The more specialized the | narrower the target market. The Amazon stores seemed to stock a | lot of what a general bookstore would stock with a few novelty | items like in a gift store thrown in. | bduerst wrote: | Most big box retailers lease store space (by the sq ft) to | OEMs now, instead of buying and distributing the goods | themselves. | | Much less liability for the retailer, and puts the onus for | sales on the manufacturer. I would be surprised if Amazon | didn't try to do that with their 4-star shops. | michaelmrose wrote: | A store is proximity plus curation. Of all the 985 possible | car stereos you could possibly buy they have 12 that will | serve a variety of needs while filtering out useless inferior | or poorly prices options rather than you having to evaluate | the a much broader selection of options. It's likely that | your interests and the stores are somewhat aligned. At the | front end there is a bunch of overpriced candy, soda, and | magazines. Therein your interests aren't aligned. All of it | is terrible for you and terribly priced. The entire section | is designed to manipulate and harm in a small fashion all the | people it is dealing with hopefully fairly in the other | section. Consider programming vs ads same difference. | | A store that lacks any direction, curation, and empathy is | more like the front end or ad space than the body of the | store or programming. It is not that they are focused on what | they want to sell you of course they are. It's that they have | put less thought in what they would want to buy if they put | themselves in your place. An algorithm is a shit way to stock | a store. | [deleted] | belval wrote: | Never saw those in real life, but I don't get why a part of | Amazon Retail is interested in having actual stores. Most (nearly | all?) their customers use them because they can deliver 1-2 day | shipping on a ton of items without having to go out to shop. Need | some niche hydroponic nutrients, they have it. Need some precise | book that your typical bookstore doesn't have, they have it. | | I don't see why I'd want to go to an Amazon Shop instead of Wal- | mart, Canadian Tire, Target, whatever else already exists. It's a | market with razor-thin margins that's absolutely doesn't fit | their current approach and growth focus. | SamReidHughes wrote: | I'm glad, only because their bookstore didn't accept cash. | | They were a convenient way to return incorrect products, though. | Tagbert wrote: | A lot of stores and shops either don't or are reluctant to | accept cash right now. Partially due to people's COVID | contamination concerns and partially because change is still | hard to get. | muffinman26 wrote: | In the US where a lot of these stores were (Amazon usually | starts its pilot programs near its headquarters), that was | maybe true a year and a half ago, but now. Change is no | longer hard to find, and the few stores that held on to never | accepting cash have closed. | | If someone is willing to pay with a card, _especially_ if | they 're worried about COVID contamination, why would they go | to a store for something they can buy at Amazon in the first | place? The reports seems to pretty consistently say that | surface contamination is a much less likely vector for spread | than human proximity, and going to a store still involves | human proximity. | relyks wrote: | Yeah, being able to return products at physical locations like | their stores and Kohl's without having to pay a shipping fee | has been a godsend | johndfsgdgdfg wrote: | It's great that Amazon is reducing its carbon footprint. Closing | down physical bookstores is a step in right direction to fight | climate change. | servercobra wrote: | I really liked the one in northern Chicago mostly because it had | a nice coffee shop inside. But otherwise it seemed like a novelty | and something I wouldn't use for actual shopping. Amazon Go on | the other hand... | dymk wrote: | That's a bummer, their 4-Star shops were my go-to for gifts | during the holiday season. | | I wonder how long they'll keep the Amazon Fresh brick-and-mortar | experiment running. | relyks wrote: | The Amazon Go and Fresh stores are a lot more successful and | they serve as distribution centers for Amazon Fresh online | orders. It's unlikely they'll close them down | trts wrote: | They were pretty great for that purpose. Somehow visiting a | 4-star store was more efficient than staying home and perusing | 10 different 'best-of' lists across kitchen, electronics, book | or game categories. I always found something interesting when I | visited. | | It was a bit like a Sharper Image but instead of 80% of the | items being useless gadgets it was more like 20%. | ZainRiz wrote: | The only good things about these stores was that you got to hold | a kindle in your hands before deciding to buy one on amazon.com | cs702 wrote: | Off the bat, I can think of two reasons for this: | | 1. _Even Amazon 's own bricks-and-mortar stores_ find it | impossible to compete against Amazon's online store. | | Or: | | 2. The physical stores were just a "front" necessary for | developing and testing new technology (as suggested by mabbo | elsewhere on this page | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30533453). | | My money is on #2. | thenerdhead wrote: | It was weird to step in one and say "eh, I'll just order it on | Kindle later". | qbasic_forever wrote: | I actually liked the 4 star store when I visited. Because it | stocked items that were highly reviewed it had the peculiar | quality of being a showcase for tons of well-rated knock-off | items. Like I saw no-name camping and kitchen gear that I had | always wanted to get a close up look at to understand the quality | and if it was worth the low price. These items were placed right | next to bigger name brand stuff too which I'm sure infuriated | their marketing and sales teams. | | So it might have been a doomed concept from the start, but I'll | miss having a physical showcase for cheap knock-off and import | goods. | gleenn wrote: | Seems that having the brick and mortar shop exposes how cheap | the crap on Amazon is. I never regret going to a store for | anything remotely expensive where I'm unsure of the quality. | Amazon will always hover around just good enough and just cheap | enough. | kwertyoowiyop wrote: | I trust them for USB/HDMI/etc cables, but nothing else. But | I'd rather order cables from Monoprice anyway. | Kluny wrote: | Yeah, that actually sounds like a cool concept. | npunt wrote: | I wish Amazon would try different shopping experiences online, | versus the hellscape of overoptimization that is Amazon.com. | | Part of the appeal of a bookstore is to have a different shopping | experience than what you get online or even at other physical | stores. It's walking over to a section, picking up a book, seeing | what resonates. It's 'browsing' in a slower, calmer form, closer | to the reading experience itself. | | Why doesn't Amazon try to make that? Replicate that experience in | a new brand, call it 'booklovers.com' or something. Make it a cut | down subset of features and information, with the book's content | more at the center of the experience and easier to browse, along | with the books 'next to' it. More curated, less metadata. | | Being freed of physical world means we can have many very | different experiences without dealing with the scarcity of real | estate. Yet Amazon tries to standardize the shopping experience, | to the detriment of many categories of products that deserve | their own approach. | Spooky23 wrote: | It's funny I just spoke to a colleague about this a few hours | ago. Anker.com is basically an Amazon storefront without the | shitscape. | | Amazon makes so much money from bullshit at retail that they | cannot enable basic features that even not so great physical | retailers get right. Case in point: try buying windshield | wipers for multiple cars. You'll get ads for incompatible | blades and tricked into a subscription. It's literally worse | than the 1980 experience of flipping through a torn, filthy | book hanging from a shelf by a string. | Gigachad wrote: | Steam tried this with their curators feature. You can subscribe | to ordinary users and see their personal | recommendations/reviews. Not idea how well this feature is used | but personally I found the general AI recommendations to be | better and most of the curators to over blow everything and | call a game literally unplayable because they could only get | 59fps on one scene. | philistine wrote: | That curators feature was buried way too deep into the | interface. | | What OP is proposing is the vision to divorce the URL from | the warehouses. Allow some teams within Amazon to make | websites to buy books or other stuff from bespoke URLs. I | think at the scale that Amazon has, it would only help. | bwb wrote: | I am working on this :)! Shepherd.com, only 10 months old but i | have a lot more formats planned as we get further along! | | I use NLP on the backend to tie books to Wikipedia topics and | working to improve that and bring in genre filters/pages soon. | | Let me know what you think (ben@shepherd.com) | erehweb wrote: | I think abebooks.com is owned by Amazon - maybe they are trying | something like that there. | bckygldstn wrote: | Amazon also owns bookdepository.com (and goodreads.com) | fassssst wrote: | There's a massive opportunity to make VR shopping experiences. | Just try Redfin VR and see how cool it is for shopping for | houses. I want to shop for other big purchases that way. | Gigachad wrote: | Houses is an interesting one. It would massively improve the | experience if they just took some more photos or used one of | those products which builds a 3D scan of the property. But | they seem to sell fast with 3 photos and an inaccurate | floorplan so why bother I guess. Maybe we need to just cut | out the agent and get home owners to list their own | properties and build the scans with lidar on their phones. | scotuswroteus wrote: | I hated these places. The one I walked into was literally the | opposite of the vibe of the kind of bookstore I like, whether | it's independent or even a Barnes and Noble. It was a soulless | operation, where they follow you around the store if you don't | look rich and in a hurry to leave. Good riddance. | balls187 wrote: | Ah, sucks. I really liked the 4-star store. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-02 23:00 UTC)