[HN Gopher] My New Old Macintosh SE/30 Computer ___________________________________________________________________ My New Old Macintosh SE/30 Computer Author : whatrocks Score : 71 points Date : 2022-03-03 18:20 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (charlieharrington.com) (TXT) w3m dump (charlieharrington.com) | markus_zhang wrote: | Does anyone know what kind of dev environment you can get on an | SE? I guess assembly and Pascal are available. | mwcremer wrote: | http://macintoshgarden.org/apps/development-tools | markus_zhang wrote: | thanks! | ksherlock wrote: | Apple's dev environment was MPW - Macintosh Programmer's | Workshop - which provided a Unix-ish command-line environment | within a text editor, if that makes sense. Ot included Asm, | Pascal, C (later C++) and Rez compilers as well as common | utilities. Some GNU utilities were also ported over. | RodgerTheGreat wrote: | Think C: https://www.macintoshrepository.org/1417-symantec- | think-c-5-... | | QuickBASIC: https://winworldpc.com/product/quickbasic/10x-for- | mac | | Logo, Smalltalk, Forth, ABC, Lisp, and others: | https://www.gryphel.com/c/sw/program/index.html | markus_zhang wrote: | interesting. a lot than I expected | mistrial9 wrote: | score! Honestly I like BBEdit to this day for text, and the | vector drawing programs. No mention of postscript printing, but | that works well (pre-Level III postscript). Very fast interface | for most things, even faster than many desktop computers today | for native Mac software. I definitely kept my OS install disks | and amenities, but it is somewhat humbling to read about entire | ROMs and SCSI hacks here.. not easy! very nice to see it on | YNews. | mrkstu wrote: | Mac/Claris Draw is still more usable than anything comparable | today and therefore the effective power is almost as much for | non-pro users. | ge96 wrote: | There was a video I saw a while back of one of these connecting | to Google. It took a while but when it loaded it was surreal like | wow, this old technology works today. | | Also if you like this stuff there's popular channels out there | like Adrian's Digital basement or 8bit guy, etc... | | Side note: the movie Jobs (2013) was dramatized and all that but | it had a cool scene, when those circuits drew something on a | screen. I am aware of Xerox Alto and all that. But still the | concept of making something so new... idk that's cool would like | to be part of that. Also those chips seem more tangible than an | i7 or something. You could almost mentally map which chip goes to | what part of the screen. | | I will say I'm past it though, I don't really covet old tech just | because of performance. I do to some degree like old Chromebooks | using Linux. | blable2 wrote: | Mine was 6K USD new in 1989 I think. | npunt wrote: | SE/30's are the best. Here's a summary of some other modern and | contemporaneous upgrades available: | https://nickpunt.com/blog/se-30th-anniversary/ | GeekyBear wrote: | Find a copy of the game, Crystal Quest. I think it was the best | of the early arcade style games. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_Quest | RodgerTheGreat wrote: | Playable on an emulated Mac in your browser (along with loads | of other demos), courtesy of the Internet Archive: | | https://archive.org/details/mac-demo-games | bobpappas wrote: | MacGolf is a must have in this article. I'm so sad it wasn't | included. | zargon wrote: | My thought was Dark Castle is missing. | sdoering wrote: | The SE30 was the first real computer I was working on. The | company my father worked for started to implement computers at | the desks of most people. During the day they learned how to use | them. In the late afternoon and evenings he did his regular work | as a team lead. Me, being 14 was often at his work place (him | being a single dad had me helping at the photocopy machine and | stuff). And I was allowed to work/play on the computer. | | Shortly thereafter I got my own Macintosh Classic with 4mb RAM | and 40 MB hard disk. | buserror wrote: | Ah, I also bought a SE/30 recently, as part of a batch of an | upgraded 128->plus, an original SE, and my prize: the SE/30. All | working too. | | The reason I bought the SE/30 is because it's the computer I had | on long term loan for my very first "paying" gig as developer, I | was 17: making the software that drove the audio system for the | Lille (FR) brand new metro lines back then. | | Wrote the software in Turbo Pascal, to run on a smaller mac -- it | had a GPIO card that drove 2 big REVOX tape reels, and was | rewinding them in sequence while the other played elevator music. | It also had a selector and an 'alarm' button to trigger _digital_ | announces from the control room, in case of problems on the metro | line. The audio played on 10th 's of stations, for years. | | After a few mishaps (finding tapes torn to completely shreds in | the computer room, because the 'beginning of tape' signal hadn't | worked really well after rewinding!) it worked absolutely | flawlessly until late 1999. I should have charged more :-) | | It also had an easter egg! It was playing an 'happy birthday' | message to _myself_ every year, in every stations, early day on | my birthday. Nobody ever complained :-) | | I eventually returned the SE/30, and was given a PowerBook 140, | which wasn't as fast, but hey, _laptop_ baby, and, I still own | that one! | erickhill wrote: | In that post he links to "the 6th most 'notable' Mac ever" over | on Six Colors where they created a Top 20 of all-time list. | | How that list failed to include the "Jurassic Park" computer, the | gorgeous Quadra 700, truly made me sad. It's a machine where, if | you need to take it apart, you can remove every single component | - even the PSU and motherboard - with only ever needing to remove | a single screw. (You can even remove the PSU's fan w/o needing | any tools.) The rest is so beautifully designed that you can pop | release all of it: floppy drive, hard drive PSU, speaker, | motherboard, etc. | | The 1 single screw holds the drive caddy to the case. That's it. | And it's a design strategy that I'm willing to bet at least 50% | of Quadra 700 owners back in the day didn't even realize was | sitting on their desks. | | By the way, the mini-desktop machine could be stood vertically or | laid on its side - it was up to the user. Simply breathtakingly | incredible design. | chipotle_coyote wrote: | Well, the list's author (Jason Snell, the former editor of | Macworld) does write, "one of the most popular things about | this series will be arguments about my terrible rankings and my | unforgivable omissions." :) | erickhill wrote: | 100% - I totally get it. Lists like these are always going to | have What Ifs thrown in every direction. And the Q700 wasn't | exactly popular by the mainstream (honestly, it was too | expensive for that kind of awareness). And the list they | created is fine even though the ordering could be batted | around by plenty. | | I was just opining about an anecdotal personal fave. :) | runjake wrote: | Link: https://sixcolors.com/post/2020/08/20-macs-for-2020-an- | intro... | Bud wrote: | I still have my old SE/30. It's still working. Has the Ethernet | card installed, so it's even marginally useful. | | I also picked up my old 512k "Fat" Mac from my aunt's house where | I had it stored for 20 years. Powered it up. Bright white screen, | perfectly sharp, works perfectly. Not bad for a machine that | debuted in 1984. | chizhik-pyzhik wrote: | Which ethernet card do you have? I have a saved ebay search but | nothing has popped up recently | wwweston wrote: | Would you say it's worth getting an ethernet card and fixing | one with screen (likely leaky cap) issues? | | I've got one that I've wondered might be a good connected-but- | not-TOO-connected device. | floren wrote: | If you haven't already, you should open it up and remove the | PRAM battery. I've seen what happens when the battery bursts | and then sits for a few years... not pretty. The caps aren't | as big of a deal in comparison, they just need to be replaced | when you want to use it. | zargon wrote: | The caps _are_ a big deal, just not _as_ bad as the | battery. The caps leak corrosive electrolytic fluid which | eats traces and corrodes component legs. Most un-restored | SE /30s require trace repairs at this point due to leaky | caps. The longer the original caps remain the more | extensive the repairs. | Bud wrote: | If you're a real Mac lover? Definitely. I used to use mine | all the time as a very fancy vt100 terminal for an old Apollo | server I had, and also to telnet to a BBS I was running in | the late 90s. | | It's a great conversation piece, too. | parenthesis wrote: | There is just something perfect about the original Mac series. | | When Steve Jobs saw the Xerox Alto, he thought "well, _obviously_ | all personal computers are going to be like this ", which is | pretty much how I felt upon encountering the Mac for the first | time (not until 1990). | | My opinions tend to be pretty weak these days (like a three- | handed economist), but with a typical teenage passion, I could | not understand why anyone would use Windows, or how Windows could | even exist when the Mac was there. | | When I finally got my own (i)Mac in 2000, it was no longer quite | so perfect. Although, I think the OS X 10.3 - 10.5 era got close. | technothrasher wrote: | > I could not understand why anyone would use Windows, or how | Windows could even exist when the Mac was there. | | Replace Windows with Mac and Mac with Amiga and you're in my | teenage passion years! | | Although I had the same feeling of "this is the future" when I | saw a demonstration of the original Mac in 1984. But I just | remember thinking, "no color?" | jandrese wrote: | Steve Jobs had a bug up his butt about machines that could | play games being "toys for kids" and he did everything he | could to have the Mac treated like a "serious business" | machine, part of that included sticking with boring corporate | monochrome graphics. | | I think he was mostly trying to avoid comparisons to the 8 | bit Apples. | | The other reason being of course that VRAM was breathtakingly | expensive at the time and you could save some money by going | with 1 bit per pixel. All in all the Mac with its 512x342 | monochrome display tended to come out looking nicer than the | contemporary 320x200 16 color EGA graphics. | zabzonk wrote: | > There is just something perfect about the original Mac | series. | | Oh, come on: | | - tiny screen | | - one-button mouse | | - little memory | | - expense | | - poor tools | | - closed architecture | | - yada yada | | I remember when the Mac first came out, the guy in the next | room had one. I asked him "How do I write some C code on this?" | Blank looks. | deltarholamda wrote: | It's hard to quantify, but sitting at one of these upright | Macs is a joy. The B&W screen was great for writing. It had | this friendly-face look about it, and it took up so little | desk space. A laptop is sort of similar, but you sit hunched | over at those. The classic Mac allowed you to sit like a | human instead of a caveman. | | I get that it's not great for everything we do today that | requires acres of screen real estate, but if you want to | concentrate on a single task like writing (or programming) | with little distraction, it's really nice. | parenthesis wrote: | On the one hand, I can't disagree with you, but on the other, | it's like saying that Fred Astaire isn't good looking enough | to be a movie star. | zabzonk wrote: | But he could dance a little. The original Macs were not | really useful at all. | wwweston wrote: | News to me as someone who used them to do things as a kid | (music sequencing, sound design, software experiments, | vector/bitmap art). | | Modern machines are incredible and do so much more but | these were useful in their time. | zabzonk wrote: | My comment was on the original Macs - those with almost | no memory, one floppy drive, and huge expense. | technothrasher wrote: | For me at least, WYSIWYG word processing was the killer | app on the original Mac. The 8-bit machines and current | DOS machines at the time just couldn't compare, although | windows PCs caught up pretty quickly. | flenserboy wrote: | They really didn't catch up until much later, and much of | that had to do with printing. Macs produced decent output | out of the box -- fonts were a focus, and it showed. | desiarnezjr wrote: | I remember it took years for Windows to catch on - not | until Windows 3.0 I'd say, so really a 5+ year gap. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.0 | | There were other graphical desktops like Amiga and Atari | ST around that time but nothing on either platforms had | the finesse of the early Mac programs (as flawed as they | could be). | eweise wrote: | Really? I had a mac plus. Loaded Think C on it. Worked fine. | goosedragons wrote: | Key bit is first came out. I don't think in 1984 there was | any dev tools for the Mac or very little (MS Basic I | guess?). Think C was released sometime in 1986. Mac | software production at the time was done on Lisas in a | kinda similar fashion to iOS and the Mac today. | robterrell wrote: | Aztec C was the first C compiler for the Mac I | remember... I think it was 1985? It was self-hosted too, | no Lisa required. But Think C (and Think Pascal) were the | real game-changers for me. | isx726552 wrote: | There would have been a dev environment (MacBasic) for | the average user, but certain forces had other plans: | | https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=MacBasic.txt | RodgerTheGreat wrote: | And to complete the story, the program itself: | https://macintoshgarden.org/apps/macbasic-10 | ndiddy wrote: | More context: When Microsoft unveiled Windows, John | Sculley threatened legal action against them for copying | the "look and feel" of the Macintosh. Bill Gates | responded by threatening to stop development of all | Macintosh programs and not renew the license for Apple II | Basic, so Apple backed down. As a part of the remediation | process, Apple had to stop working on MacBasic and (more | importantly) sign an agreement granting Microsoft a | license to create derivative works of the Macintosh's | GUI. | | https://www.filfre.net/2018/07/doing-windows-part-6-look- | and... | ndiddy wrote: | More information on how early Mac development was done: | https://macgui.com/news/article.php?t=477 | coward123 wrote: | You know what I miss from that era? The extension that would | allow Oscar the Grouch to pop out of the trash can. What I mean | is - Macintosh really had this different vibe back then. You | could easily customize everything about your experience in a way | that was very exploratory. How many hours of my youth were wasted | screwing around in RezEdit or in making cool icons? Yes, it's | super cool there are things like Swift Playground these days - | I'm glad we live in an era where I don't have to pirate Symantec | Pascal like I did when I was 13 and wanted to learn how to code. | But, I wish the overall user experience were more the fun and | creative feel we once had rather than a very slick but overly | corporate one. | gnu8 wrote: | Besides all of the software listed, that machine would also be a | prime A/UX rig with that amount of RAM installed | whatrocks wrote: | I'm going to add this to my to-do list. | formvoltron wrote: | This guy came from money. I had a Mac SE but couldn't afford that | 30MB drive. I had two floppy disks instead. | zargon wrote: | > Write Apple-Script to automate turning on 32-bit addressing | automatically and setting the correct date every time I turn on | the computer | | Rob Mitchelmore wrote the Force32 extension which is made for | Macs without a PRAM battery. It makes sure 32-bit addressing is | enabled during startup. (Note that since a restart is required | after enabling 32-bit addressing, it will automatically restart | during the first cold boot). | | https://macintoshgarden.org/apps/force32 | | https://github.com/cheesestraws/Force32 | assttoasstmgr wrote: | Can someone explain why removal (as opposed to replacement) of | the PRAM battery is necessary? How is this different from any | other CMOS motherboard battery? Is there a fault in the circuitry | that causes the battery to fail catastrophically? | torgoguys wrote: | Those batteries fail and leak all over the board around them, | destroying traces and components. These aren't your typical | lithium coin cell batteries that are very good at not leaking. | | When a leak happens, even if you can fix/replace the components | mounted to the boards, when you've got multi-layer boards it | gets hard to figure out how repair the damage that happened to | the internal traces and such. | | If possible, replacing those batteries with something less | likely to juice all over is what you want to do. And since you | don't really know when it will start to leak, getting those old | batteries out NOW is the safest option. | chizhik-pyzhik wrote: | My understanding is that it just needs to be replaced, it's a | standard 1/2 length AA battery. | | People recommend to remove them altogether though, I guess they | figure the machines will be sitting in a closet for another 15 | years, best to remove the problem altogether. | Shared404 wrote: | > People recommend to remove them altogether though, I guess | they figure the machines will be sitting in a closet for | another 15 years, best to remove the problem altogether. | | This is the reason. | | At the repair shop where I've worked we do recycling, and | there's a lot of electronics that get destroyed by leaky | batteries. | | If you can do it without voiding warranty (and sometimes even | if you do void the warranty), always take the batteries out | of electronics when they go into storage. | assttoasstmgr wrote: | It looks like this guy is actively using the machine so I | couldn't understand why putting in a fresh battery and | changing it regularly wouldn't be the preferred option and | not dealing with a reset system clock every time you powered | it off. As opposed to there was something on the logic board | of the SE/30 that was harming the battery in some way and | causing it to fail prematurely. | | This read more like "my gran says to always unplug the | toaster else the house will surely burn down" | zargon wrote: | Even if it is currently being used frequently, there will | come a time where it sits forgotten for an extended period. | This isn't always a deliberate decision. Even if it is, | it's easy to procrastinate removing the battery. This | person is also afraid of opening the machine due to the | CRT. In such a situation I think foregoing the battery is | smart. Another option is wiring up an external battery that | is much easier to remove (and won't be able to destroy the | machine even if forgotten). | assttoasstmgr wrote: | Seems like a great use for one of those "battery | eliminator" things, with an empty plastic shell in the | shape of the battery with a pair of leads that extends | out of the case. | zargon wrote: | Yeah, definitely. I started designing one a while back | but haven't done the external mounting system for it yet. | This is the prototype (finished one would have longer | wires and an enclosure that clips onto the back of the | Mac someplace): https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?attachmen | ts/img_20201213_191... | rbanffy wrote: | I'll never quite get over the fact that many of these computers | could just be designed with the components (and exploding | battery) facing down so that, when they leak their corrosive | fluids, they will flow away from the board. | | OTOH, who'd imagine back then we'd still be using and | cherishing these little machines? | kristopolous wrote: | I had one with a 10baseT network card about 20 years ago. I ran | NetBSD on it and punched a hole open so anyone could log in. I | think I posted about it in the NetBSD IRC channel back in the | EFNet days. | | You started up System 7 at first and then clicked on the launcher | and it would reboot into NetBSD. This was like 1.something ... | might have been 1.5? | | I had some external SCSI drives for it in the low GB range and I | believe a CDRW. I think the ram was at 128MB (might have been 96) | | I had compiled Mozilla 0.9 or so for it (whatever was current) | and it actually ran (compiling took I think 4 days because I | compiled it _on_ the SE /30). You could see the elements of the | interface render to the screen in human time. | | I distinctly remember seeing each button come in to view and then | slowly typed in "slashdot.org". | | I used it as an X terminal as well, using the -broadcast option | to log into an HP-UX 10.20 machine. I ran sam and CDE on that | tiny monochrome screen. So ridiculous. | | It was a glorious waste of time. | | Just looked in my old email archives --- this was indeed from | 2002. Right, 20 years it is then. | deltarholamda wrote: | Had one with the PDS Ethernet card as well. With Mode32 you | could put in 128MB of RAM without swapping the ROM, or you | could snitch a IIsi (IIRC) ROM and be 32-bit clean. | | I put NetBSD on mine as well, and used it as a mail server for | a time. With a little jiggery-pokery of a Wifi AP you could | even be wireless. | | Great machines. | rsync wrote: | Just a note related to the SCSI2SD device mentioned in the | article ... | | I recently bought four of these for use with various SGI and ran | into a minor difficulty and the maker of these devices went _well | beyond the call of duty_ to assist me and provide suggestions, | etc. | | On a Saturday. | lolive wrote: | I have spent most of my early computer years playing Sierra games | and (Beyond) Dark Castle on a Mac SE. | | Still a marvellous memory! | | [my father brought one day a CD300. It was supposed to be a | revolution. Well ok, I used it to listen to Pink Floyd CDs while | playing King Quest ;)] | unfocussed_mike wrote: | We had The Oregon Trail as part of teaching materials in our | school in the 1980s. | | In the _UK_. | | Most of us in my class didn't know where Oregon is, really did | not care about a story of woefully unprepared people who chose to | make a journey for reasons of absolutely no consequence to a | British nine year old, and to this day likely bear a grudge | against an entire US state. | | I got into an awful lot of trouble for submitting the minimum | possible homework on that. Other kids: fifteen pages of detailed | drawings and stories. Me: two A5 sides of completely | disinterested made-up diary. | | It was my only real rebellion. | Aloha wrote: | I'm about a decade younger than you - and I have the exact | opposite memories of the Oregon Trail. | | It was a break from school where we got to play video games. | unfocussed_mike wrote: | Was the Mac version fun then? :-) | zabzonk wrote: | > We had The Oregon Trail as part of teaching materials in our | school in the 1980s. | | > In the UK. | | You may be misrembering - a Mac would be very rare in a UK | school - it was probably an Apple II. | skissane wrote: | > You may be misrembering - a Mac would be very rare in a UK | school - it was probably an Apple II. | | Getting even more off-topic, but I remember being a kid/teen | in 1980s/90s Australia, and the diversity of machines we got | to use at school impresses me in hindsight: Apple IIs, | Commodore 64s, classic Macs, Acorn Archimedes, IBM PC JXs | running DOS, Atari STs, no-name IBM PC compatibles running | Windows 3.x/9x and Netware. (Not all at the same school, that | was across four different schools I attended K-12.) My own | kids don't get exposed to anywhere near as much technological | variety. | Doctor_Fegg wrote: | We had a room of BBC Micros, a room of RM Nimbuses, and a | room of Macs at school (UK). The Macs were evidently the | coolest. Pretty much the first thing I did when I got to | university was buy a IIsi (funded by the articles I was | writing for an 8-bit magazine). | unfocussed_mike wrote: | I didn't say anything about a Mac. Though I accept I am | taking it way off topic with my little grumble. Really I'm | just still smarting at being told off :-) | | It absolutely wouldn't have been an Apple II; I never saw an | Apple II in the UK until they were retro. It would have been | a port to the (similarly 6502-based) BBC Model B. We had | loads of those in schools [0]. | | A bit of a google suggests that it was likely based on code | from a 1978 computer listing, though it would have been 1983 | when it was inflicted on us. | | Funnily enough I don't think we spent more than half an hour | with the computer. A week or so with the assignment. | | [0] the Apple II would have been more expensive, and didn't | provide the opportunity for schools-television-related | content or a loan of the county's (truly groundbreaking) | Domesday Book laser disk system: | | https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co83846. | .. | zabzonk wrote: | > I didn't say anything about a Mac. | | True, but this is a post about Macs - see title. | unfocussed_mike wrote: | Yes -- edited my comment. I'm really just dragging it off | topic and should be ignored :-) | soneil wrote: | I went to a .. I want to say not very affluent school in | Scotland, but that'd be an understatement. But we were taught | to type on classic macs. I don't remember exactly what model, | but definitely these ones with the little offset grin. | | All I really remember is a shufflepuck game. That's it. | | Just to confuse things, this would have been about 1995. That | awkward gap between the beebs, and Tesco taking an interest | in the matter. | barbecue_sauce wrote: | We played Oregon Trail as part of school here in the US, and | probably had a similar sense of US geography at the time, but | we were just happy to get to use the computers. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-03 23:00 UTC)