[HN Gopher] My journey for dual displays with my M1 Pro Mac (2021) ___________________________________________________________________ My journey for dual displays with my M1 Pro Mac (2021) Author : walterbell Score : 58 points Date : 2022-03-04 15:12 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.derekseaman.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.derekseaman.com) | wataban wrote: | hammock wrote: | To add another data point for anyone looking for help- I | connected two Displayport monitors to my M1 macbook with a | Plugable Displaylink hub. The hub I chose also has 2 HDMI ports | if I ever got new monitors, plus 6 USB-A ports, an ethernet port | and an audio jack. | | What it doesn't do, is power your laptop. I don't believe any | Displaylink hub can do that. | | $159 and Plugable has other port configurations to choose from as | well: | https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08B6CZ29Q/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b... | l30n4da5 wrote: | friend of mine is running three displays off a displayLink hub | on his new m1 mac pro. seems displaylink is a really good | choice, at least. | costcofries wrote: | I've had great success with dual monitors using DisplayLink | Manager, really handy little app - | https://www.synaptics.com/products/displaylink-graphics/down... | blakesterz wrote: | Has anyone else switched from using 2 monitors to just using one | big extra wide one? I've found it to be just as good as two, if | not better. Maybe a little more expensive than buying two, but | it's been worth it. | bombcar wrote: | On my MacBook Pro I have two ultrawides, and two HDPI 4ks, it's | nice. | protomyth wrote: | The Dell UltraSharp U4919DW is 32x9 with a 5120 x 1440 at 60Hz. | I works with the MacBook as long as you do not use the HDMI | port. I have mine hooked up either via a Thunderbolt 4 dock or | a USB-C to DisplayPort cable. | | You can test you got the full resolution by doing: | system_profiler SPDisplaysDataType | awk '/Resolution/{print | $2, $3, $4}' | kitsunesoba wrote: | I haven't, for a few reasons. | | - The logical "partitioning" of workspace between displays is a | nice tool for organization, particularly when combined with | Spaces/virtual desktops | | - I work from home, so my main display does double duty between | work and games, which is a problem with the latter with many | games having bad or lackluster ultrawide support | | - Ultrawides restrict display selection quite considerably and | often require concessions on things like color performance, | backlight bleed, pixel response times (especially curved | ultrawides, which seem to all use VA panels which are known for | smearing and slow response times) | nixpulvis wrote: | > The logical "partitioning" of workspace between displays is | a nice tool for organization, particularly when combined with | Spaces/virtual desktops | | Use a better window manager. | kitsunesoba wrote: | That wouldn't really work for me. The physical separation | (and different display angle that brings) and ability to | set different wallpapers per workspace per monitor are | important and can't be reproduced with a window manager. | | I also just don't like micromanaging my window arrangement | or having the WM try to do it automatically (and usually | get it wrong). | nixpulvis wrote: | That's a good point. I personally like having one | horizontal and one vertical setup. | OJFord wrote: | > I also just don't like micromanaging my window | arrangement or having the WM try to do it automatically | (and usually get it wrong). | | How is that solved by adding a monitor? If I used two (I | don't any more) I would still use a (better than macOS | default) window manager. | oarsinsync wrote: | > I would still use a (better than macOS default) window | manager. | | What are some of the alternatives that you would | recommend? | kitsunesoba wrote: | Both an extra monitor and an ultrawide add more space for | windows, but the naturally partitioned nature of a second | display combined with virtual desktops also provides low | effort organization. | | So in my typical usage, secondary/tertiary/etc windows go | into purposed virtual desktops on the second monitor -- | e.g. one virtual desktop for documentation, another for | chat, etc. This allows me to swap out the sets of less | important windows independent of the main display's | workspace, with practically zero management overhead | (just assign apps to virtual desktops during initial | setup). | | The extent of third party window management I use is | Moom, which I use to snap maybe 3-5 windows across my | entire workspace into specific locations/sizes. Something | that emulates a Linux tiling WM like Amethyst would drive | me insane. | wil421 wrote: | I switched to an ultrawide and will never look back. My last | setup was 2 monitors. Having 2 1440p monitors basically stuck | together to make an ultrawide is a dream come true. It's 100% | worth the switch. | | My M1 Air runs my ultrawide at 60hz and is buttery smooth. | turtlebits wrote: | IMO, 1440p is too low of a pixel density for productivity. My | first 1440p monitor was 10 years ago. If only 2160p | ultrawides weren't prohibitively expensive. | wil421 wrote: | Agreed, 4K is my favorite resolution. I was going to add | above that the only way I'd buy another monitor was if it | was a 4K or higher ultrawide. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | I've long preferred one large monitor. Which ultrawide do you | have? | nsxwolf wrote: | I have an Acer XR382CQK which is 3840x1600 and can do 75hz. | I can't live without it now. | wil421 wrote: | I bought this one but it was overkill for my needs. I think | the model below this one is a better buy. They were out | when I bought it. | | https://www.microcenter.com/product/639902/lg-34gp950g-34-2 | k... | mojzu wrote: | I've been using the LG C1 48", it's a little too tall so the | upper portion of the screen rarely sees use outside of full | screen video/games, but otherwise it's great. Although my | opinion may change if it starts burning in significantly | jasoneckert wrote: | I use an ultrawide monitor alongside a vertically-oriented | monitor (for code review) - I find this setup fits my personal | and professional needs perfectly! | rayiner wrote: | I like my single 32" at home better than my dual 27" at work. | bentcorner wrote: | I don't have experience with this on a Mac but I've been trying | this recently on Windows. Window snapping and edge-of-screen | behaviors make using multiple monitors slightly better than | using a single monitor that is just as large. | | Fancyzones makes this much more tolerable but misses a few | minor scenarios. | | I replaced two 1440p monitors with a single ultrawide and | complemented it with a tablet on my desk showing hdmi through | deskreen, usually showing a chat window. I guess technically I | still have two displays but it takes up less desk space | overall. | | On the positive side the displays are centered in front of me | better and I can fiddle with the tablet placement much more | easily than a real monitor. I've experienced neck strain | working for extended periods with windows on the edge of the | farthest dual monitor. | hereforphone wrote: | I did this and I agree that it's a better solution (for me). | Keeping your neck twisted to the side for long periods of time | is not good. With an extra wide monitor you can pull over | windows to the center if you want to focus on them for any | significant period of time. | colinmhayes wrote: | Having a single monitor messes up macOS's virtual desktop | environment. Much easier to swipe between fullscreen apps with | two seperate desktops. | TrueGeek wrote: | I love the single ultra wide over two monitors. The only | problem I have is when presenting. I need to show several apps | at once but if I share my entire screen it obviously looks | horrible for everyone else. The solution is to open my MacBook | and share from there. Not a huge deal, but a bit annoying. | jdesmond wrote: | I wrote this[0] post on how I use OBS to share a 1080p sized | portion of my upper left ultrawide monitor through Microsoft | Teams. If you can share just a specific window, then this | should work with google meet. | | https://jamesdesmond.org/posts/teams-screenshare-mac/ | [deleted] | yurishimo wrote: | I have a shortcut setup in my window manager app to resize | the current window to 1920x1080 specifically for screen | sharing. | Tagbert wrote: | By "window" do you mean "display"? | | I wish that when you shared an app window, Zoom would let | you scale that to fit the full screen share. That way you | could present a reasonable image of a window to viewers | while using an ultra-wide monitor. | yurishimo wrote: | No, I mean the window. Usually I'm sharing chrome or a | code editor via zoom. | n42 wrote: | Zoom lets you share a region of your screen if you click the | advanced tab when sharing. | TrueGeek wrote: | Yeah, sadly we use Google which does not. | salmonlogs wrote: | I share a tab/window and resize that window to be approx | 16:10. Shows up nicely for others and I can still see the | rest of my screen. | | If I had another window open for chat/notes/emails I can | still have that at half my ultrawide and just deal with a bit | of overlap on my end | jdesmond wrote: | I did the same but not being able to share a terminal and a | browser window at the same time is tough. | | Ended up using OBS and sharing the obs preview window | instead. This lets me add fun gifs and overlays as well to | my screen for loading or success. | jhardcastle wrote: | I have had a 43" monitor at work and at home for a while, and | the solution I've used throughout the pandemic has been to | share only a region of the screen, or to share a single | application or window, which I often shrink down to a | "laptop" size" in order to share my screen with colleagues. | That still leaves plenty of real estate around the "shared" | window that is not visible to others, but is useful to me. | shamskazi wrote: | I switched from 2 21.5" 1080p monitors to 1 40" 4k TV. At first | it felt comically huge, but I found it great for both media | consumption and working on huge documents. If I had a larger | desk, I'd move to an AORUS FO48U. | 015a wrote: | I sometimes run an ultrawide (3440x1440) off my M1 Air. It | works... ok. MacOS doesn't output more than 50hz, and every | hour or so the display will flicker off and on. I haven't | decided if its an issue with the M1, or an issue with the hub | I'm using, but its not a big enough concern for me to justify | investigating much further. | | I personally feel that 21:9 ultrawides aren't quite as good as | dual 16:9 displays for productivity. But they're fine. My | biggest complaint is that most people would reasonable center | their monitor on the desk. If you run 2x16:9, you can have one | centered, and one off to the side, which allows you to mostly | look straight forward and have a natural primary/secondary | setup. | | At 21:9, this setup is weirder; either you size your primary | window (browser, code editor, etc) to ~16:9, left-or-right- | align it, then you have to slightly crane your neck, or you | center-align it and you're left with slivers of screen real- | estate to the left-and-right. Or you can shrink the primary | center window, approaching maybe a max of 7:9 for all three | windows, which is maybe rarely useful for some applications. Or | you can maximize the window, and in most applications you get | tons of unused space. Or you can physically offset the monitor | on your desk, which looks weird. There's just no solution that | works "great" especially given these displays are oftentimes at | a small premium over 2x16:9. | | I think something like the Samsung Odyssey CRG9 would be much | higher productivity in ultrawide, with its 32:9 aspect ratio. | There, you could run a ~16:9 centered primary window, and still | have ~8:9 canvases to the left and right, which is enough | horizontal estate to comfortably have a terminal, Spotify, | browser, etc. Its also relatively affordable (~$1100), though | given you can find solid 1440p 27" monitors for $200-$300, | you're effectively cross-shopping 3x16:9 displays. Still | definitely a "luxury" buy. Its ultimately unclear to me that it | would be _better_ , and not just "differently similar". | turtlebits wrote: | I think it's your dock. I have an LG 3440x1440 (and a Dell at | work) that works fine over USB-C directly to my M1 Air. | vocoda wrote: | I tested my 3440x1440 monitor with M1 Air. I found that | fonts are rendered without anti aliasing and looked not | good at all. Do you have similar issues? | paulmd wrote: | I have 3440x1440 and it works fine - I run 100 hz on my work | MBP. Which is Intel, granted, but 3440x1440 is strictly less | than 4k, and we don't see an epidemic of people noticing that | their 4k monitor is running at 30 hz on their M1 MBPs. | | 50 hz happens to be the limit of hdmi 1.4b (at 3440x1440), it | sounds like somewhere in your chain you have something that | is running at legacy speeds. Could be your dock, could be | your monitor, could be an active adapter cable. | | I'd start by making sure you're running DisplayPort and not | HDMI. HDMI is more or less a "legacy" port these days, as far | as workstation usage is concerned. And unlike DP there is no | embedded HDMI support in USB-C Alt Mode so any sort of USB-C | to HDMI adapter needs an active converter - which may be your | hdmi 1.4 bottleneck. | | (note that the "passive" HDMI mode that full-size | displayports offer - aka DP++ - is an _optional_ part of the | spec. It 's so widely implemented on full-size ports that | most people don't realize it's optional, but embedded | DisplayPort implementations like eDP or USB-C Alt Mode, | Thunderbolt, etc don't implement this feature.) | hughrr wrote: | I have gone one step past that. The really wide monitor gave me | a neck ache as I'd persistently find myself wedging stuff at | one end. It was also 1440p which is crap. | | I now have a single 27" 4k monitor which has better text | rendering and no neck ache. | | I will buy a 27" 5k if Apple sell one. | fotta wrote: | Apple sells the LG Ultrafine 5k which is 27". It's not Apple | made but iirc they worked with LG to design it. I really like | mine, the high dpi is fantastic. I have a 27" 1440p next to | it that is pretty much relegated to being a Spotify screen | because looking at text on it feels vastly inferior to the | LG. | cehrlich wrote: | I'll switch as soon as High DPI ultrawide is a thing. | | I know there's the LG 5Kx2K monitor, but MacOS can't drive it | at 6880x2880 which is the scaling option I'd want - It's less | pixels in total than a Pro Display XDR, but I guess their logic | is "if (width > 6k) { don't allow }" | dfsegoat wrote: | I switched to a 34" UW UHD display, from 2x 24" - I definitely | prefer it. | natnatenathan wrote: | Similar journey, but I went from two down to one 27" 4k. I | found that I was getting distracted by all the extra open | windows and time spent arranging them. Maybe it is just because | I'm getting older, but I've found the key (for me) to | productivity is getting back to doing just one thing at a time. | It has taken a lot of discipline and a little bit of creativity | to achieve this, but I think my productivity has improved. | protomyth wrote: | I really don't like dual displays, but I will say the Dell | UltraSharp U4919DW is amazing hooked to my MacBook. The 32x9 is | effectively two displays and it works very well as long as you do | not try to use the HDMI port. Still not sure, why. | | I'm hoping someone does a true 4K version (well 2 4Ks side by | side I guess) | mastax wrote: | It's kind-of crazy that macOS still doesn't support DisplayPort | Multi Stream Transport - the ability to drive multiple displays | with a single DisplayPort cable. That kind of thing fits Apple's | ethos very well, and they are heavily involved in the DisplayPort | spec and support. | bombcar wrote: | My MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017) has two 34UM88s chained on a | single Thunderbolt port _somehow_. | lloeki wrote: | That's TB daisy chaining, not DP's multi thing | krnlpnc wrote: | While on the topic of Mac displays, is anyone aware of a method | to enable or mimic the OS brightness keys/controls with a non- | apple display? | | That's been my main gripe so far with an external display, that | and also MacOS not allowing rotation of an inbuilt display. | cosmotic wrote: | There are a number of github projects for both MacOS and | Windows that send DCC brightness signals to monitors | https://github.com/topics/brightness-control | lloeki wrote: | lunar, monitorcontrol | | https://lunar.fyi/ | | https://github.com/MonitorControl/MonitorControl | jtthe13 wrote: | And displaybuddy https://setapp.com/apps/displaybuddy | api wrote: | I got a regular M1 and then realized it couldn't support dual | monitors, so I just sold my two monitors and bought an ultra | wide. It's nicer anyway. | jurmous wrote: | It is possible to connect multiple screens to regular M1 Macs | with DisplayLink: | | https://plugable.com/blogs/news/how-to-connect-more-external... | lmilcin wrote: | I am running 2 external 27" 4k HDMI displays (LG 27UK650_600) | with no problem on my M1 Macbook Pro. | | I am using them either with the Macbook closed or with all three | screens at the same time. | | One of the monitors is connected using built in HDMI and this one | works super stable. | | The other is connected through Belkin adapter that I bought from | Apple. It sometimes experiences problems (it shows noise) and has | to be disconnected and reconnected. This usually happens only | after the monitor has been turned off for the night but the | laptop was on (I keep it on due to various experiments I am | running). | | Overall I am super happy. | radicality wrote: | I'm using the fully specced M1 Pro Max with the laptop screen, 6k | Pro Display XDR connected directly and 2x4k Dell monitors | connected via the Caldigit thunderbolt hub (HDMI). It's working | great, haven't had any major issues, the newest M1 MacBooks are | quite impressive. | | Apple's default screen management tooling is awful though so I | can highly recommend SwitchResX for that. | | Also have a TB4 dock from Sonnettech (3 TB4 inputs / one output), | to which I have a 10Gb/s qnap tb3 adapter plugged in. (The qnap | works great btw if you are on the lookout for 10Gb/s networking | for your MacBook. Make sure to get the sfp+ and not the ethernet | version) | tolle wrote: | I mean did he try to just daisy chain them? He claims that he | wanted to use DisplayPort 1.4 for connectivity. But the monitors | do support daisy chaining over thunderbolt, and he also states | that. But why not daisy chain? I mean I get that it's frustrating | to get the thing working with DisplayPort, dongles and docks. But | the best solution was right in front of him? | jamesfmilne wrote: | I believe macOS on Apple Silicon or Intel does not support | DisplayPort MST (Multi-Stream Transport) which is required for | daisy-chaining to work. | jsjohnst wrote: | MacOS supports MST mirror (which imho is mostly useless | outside niche uses), but not MST extend. | tolle wrote: | Over Thunderbolt at least. I imagine it might subpar on non | supported stuff. | ToniCipriani wrote: | I suppose it's the common knowledge that Mac OS doesn't support | MST properly and author assumed it applied to Thunderbolt docks | as well. This is on Apple for not implementing that, because | it's not the hardware. Intel Macbooks work perfectly fine with | regular DP Alt Mode docks in Boot Camp. | tolle wrote: | Sure. But it's like in the marketing pics even. It works over | thunderbolt. And that's what they've said. | DIVx0 wrote: | off topic but in a similar Mac and display thing. I have an LG | UltraFine 5k monitor that I love. I also have two MBPs, one for | work (2019) and a personal 16" M1 Max. | | The monitor works great plugged directly into either machine | however if I try to use any sort of DP 1.4 switch both machines | will only see my 5k monitor as 4k. I've tried various cables, all | of which say they are DP 1.4 certified. | | Anyone in this boat with me? | kitsunesoba wrote: | Surprised there was no mention of CalDigit docks. One of my desks | has an old TS3+ that drives 2x 2560x1440 monitors perfectly from | an M1 Pro machine, and it was rock solid when used with older | Intel Macs and Windows PCs too. It's Thunderbolt 3, but CalDigit | recently released a TB4 version. | | I haven't yet tried dual displays with it but my other desk is | using a Lenovo ThinkPad Thunderbolt 4 Dock and it's also been | solid. | | I suspect that a lot of the more mass market oriented docks cut | corners and don't implement specs quite to full compliance which | leads to weirdness like seen in the article. | _6n1 wrote: | When I upgraded to an M1 MacBook Pro, my CalDigit TS3+ no | longer supported dual external monitors and I had to buy a new | dock: https://www.caldigit.com/apple-silicon-mac-and-caldigit- | dock... | kitsunesoba wrote: | That's because regular M1's can only support two displays. In | the case of MacBooks, that's the internal display and one | external. | | M1 Pro and Max do not share this limitation. | voisin wrote: | Apparently DisplayLink adapters get around this limitation. | evgen wrote: | Sounds like you didn't do enough research. I am using a | CalDigit TS3+ with 2x4K and 1x1080p external displays on a M1 | Macbook Pro to write this comment. It is not difficult at all | to do and took less than five minutes of searching for me to | find the guides and instruction videos when I decided to | upgrade my Macbook to Apple Silicon. | [deleted] | dimgl wrote: | Using a CalDigit right now to power two monitors on an M1 | Macbook Pro. It doesn't go above 60hz (my monitors are 165hz) | but I'm still happy with it. Has an ethernet port too, which is | great. | emeraldd wrote: | There was a period of time where the TS3+ was completely | unavailable. Our IT people were saying that the manufacturer | couldn't get parts to build them. :( I was lucky enough to get | one before that happened and can say it works great. I'm using | a SUW49DA from Viotek. The only issue I have is that something | keeps waking the monitor up overnight but not sending a video | signal. This eventually causes the monitor to shutdown and stop | waking up until it's physically power cycled ( i.e. | unplug/replugin). Otherwise, it's been great. | bombcar wrote: | Early on especially almost _all_ of the docks had the exact | same chip on the inside. | Gatsky wrote: | I had persistent problems with mouse jitter on just one external | monitor with the M1 Air. The problem was fixed with betterDummy. | I mean, this is pretty disappointing, and wasted a lot of my | time. Lucky the M1 macs are so good in every other way. | robin_reala wrote: | (Unrelated to the subject, but this website is a perfect example | of why reader mode is a required feature for web browsers.) | grork wrote: | I think I'm a unicorn. 14" M1 Max, triple displays, albeit with | two cables. We also have an M1 Pro in the house w/ CalDigit TS3 | (non-plus), which is driving dual 4k's without issue. | | I'm confused why the author didn't just purchase one of the | cornucopia of Thunderbolt 3 (or 4) docks that do everything | including display output. | | Triple config (M1 Max): - OWC Thunderbolt 4 dock, connected to 2 | 4k displays, network, speakers, USB devices - 5k display | connected direct to the mac | | Dual Config (M1 Pro): - CalDigit TS3 dock, connected to 2 4k | displays, speakers, ethernet, USB devices | | Works perfectly, and we have no complaints about either config. | | Why Is the 5k direct connect? Because there aren't any TB docks | that support 3x displays when pushing > 4k; I'm unclear if it's | technically possible. | | I had previously run triple displays on a 13" Intel MBP using an | eGPU. I wrote about that journey here: | https://www.codevoid.net/ruminations/2020/09/27/three-displa... | lholden wrote: | It's possible the author is unaware that there are cables that | have a USB-C (TB4) connector on one end and a DisplayPort | connector on the other. This should directly support running | DisplayPort 1.4 off just the dock they purchased without | additional dongles. (Which would also work with the OWC TB4 | dock you mention). | | Possibly they had a specific need for actual DisplayPort | _ports_ on the dock though, and because they specifically | wanted DisplayPort 1.4, that ruled out TB3 docks. | | How do you like that OWC dock? It looks pretty nice. I also | noticed that CalDigit has successor to your TS3 that looks | pretty nice too. | grork wrote: | I'm very happy with the OWC dock -- it's been rock solid, and | in the eGPU/Intel config allowed single cable by daisy | chaining the eGPU off the dock. I had a similar experience | with their ThunderBolt hub (which is just 3 TB4 outs, 1 TB4 | in). | | I've theorized for a while that the OWC, Razer, Belkin, and | Kensington TB4 docks are all the same (Razer sacrificed a USB | port for RGB) -- they have the same basic layout, and same | basic capabilities. The CalDigit TS4 looks like a different | design, adding some more ports. | | I have a friend with various TB docks w/ Intel Mac + eGPU, | and have experienced a consistent issue when using a | secondary USB-C DAC for audio. I haven't, but if that's your | scenario, might be worth a pause. | rtsao wrote: | Your assumption is correct. Those docks are all based on | the Goodway DBD1100 [1]. When I was researching which dock | to purchase myself, I came across this comprehensive list | [2] of Thunderbolt docks which was super informative. | | [1] http://www.goodway.com.tw/prodimg/edm/DBD1100.pdf | | [2] https://dancharblog.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/usb4-tb4-d | ocks/ | jsjohnst wrote: | > Because there aren't any TB docks that support 3x displays | when pushing > 4k; I'm unclear if it's technically possible. | | It's not technically possible given the bandwidth available on | a TB3/TB4 port. 5K display requires 22Gbps, the port overall is | limited to 40Gbps, so not possible to get more than one on a | single cable. Due to the way TB uses the available lanes in the | cable, it's also not possible to my knowledge to support a | USB-C 4K monitor daisy chained off a 5K monitor either even | though there's sufficient bandwidth (22 + 15 < 40) to do so. | | Thunderbolt 5 w/ it's supposed 80Gbps support will change that. | n42 wrote: | my caldigit dock "works perfectly". it consistently requires | plug and unplug, opening laptop lid to unlock then unplugging | and waiting and replugging then closing laptop lid, trying | different usb-c port, and having to reboot to support higher | than 60hz refresh rates. perfectly. | mshaler wrote: | Exactly my M1 MBA 4K external display experience: "works | perfectly." | grork wrote: | I have heard from friends that the TS3+ is slightly less | reliable than the TS3. Initially -- 2017-ish -- we had | challenges with the monitors (Dell's) being weird. We | updated the firmware on the monitor (no fix), and updated | the cables to newer DP cables (Fixed it). | | YMMV, of course. | droopyEyelids wrote: | Dell did not make a thunderbolt monitor in 2017. I'm | still not sure if they do. You might be referring to | running DisplayPort over USB 3 (with a type-c connector) | | USB 3 video is a troublesome way to connect a monitor, | with a lot of vendor incompatible techniques for | signaling sleep/wake, charging, and obscure limitations | on resolution/refresh. For example, for years Dell stated | that their USB C monitors were not compatible with Apple | devices. | | Thunderbolt 3 seems far more reliable, in my experience. | superkuh wrote: | >However, I ran into a number of (firmware?) compatibility issues | with Thunderbolt docks and dongles that made the journey harder | than anticipated. | | The advertising and hype kind of masks this issue. The reality of | the new Mac architecture is that it is a "gaming console" | compared to a normal PC. It's hyper optimized for a specific type | of use and cuts corners in implementing hardware protocols and IO | because there's no need for the average apple customer. As long | as you only use the M1 console how it was intended it's amazing | and fast. But attempt to do anything outside the normal with it | and the console's glaring hardware short-cuts come to light. | jdlshore wrote: | If you're going to make claims like this, you should back them | up. What hardware shortcuts were taken, specifically, and how | do they relate to the topic at hand? | dachryn wrote: | thats just blatantly false claims. At least document those | supposed hardware short-cuts then. | | The main problem is that specs nowadays have become | meaningless. Thunderbolt has so many variations, same with | displayport and hdmi and usb. Anything in the chain can choose | to embed whatever spec in whatever way they want. Its almost | impossible to predict upfront if someting will work out of the | box or not, especially with things like docks and dongles. | jsjohnst wrote: | > Thunderbolt has so many variations | | Actually, Thunderbolt doesn't, where as the others are | definitely true. | superkuh wrote: | Inability to boot exclusively off an external hard drive for | one. | | https://eclecticlight.co/2021/02/10/external-boot-disks- | stil... , https://tidbits.com/2021/05/27/an-m1-mac-cant-boot- | from-an-e... | | This is a very common thing that all PCs can do and you'd | expect a top end ($$$$) laptop to be able to do. But because | of proprietary choices in the boot process M1 consoles can't. | jmuguy wrote: | Its best to assume that Apple just wants everyone to use a single | external monitor with their notebooks. Anytime you go beyond | that, bad things start to happen. | | I had a 2017 MacBook Pro and two 27 inch 4k monitors. I connected | these through a variety of different dongles and configurations | but always had a similar issue - after being in use for a while, | no matter what I was doing, the system started to thermal | throttle to the point of becoming unusable. | | After many hours of hair pulling I discovered that using display | scaling was the issue. Apparently using anything beyond the | "default for display" option was taxing the GPU, which causes | heat, which then heats the rest of the system to the point of it | throttling the CPU. When I finally realized this I moved to using | an eGPU. So basically something like 700 bucks for a Razer Core | eGPU and AMD video card to function as a dock. Oh and cherry on | top is the Razer Core's NIC doesn't work in macOS, Razer knows | this and isn't planning on fixing it. | | I was really excited about the M1 systems but I absolutely do not | want to go through the hell of figuring out how to get two | displays working. Particularly considering that I can't just | sidestep the issue by using my eGPU since those aren't supported. | GeekyBear wrote: | > Its best to assume that Apple just wants everyone to use a | single external monitor | | It's just a matter of different products having different | specs. Barring the use of workarounds: | | The older Macbook Pro with the plain M1 supports one external | display. | | The newer Macbook Pro with the M1 Pro supports two external | displays. | | The newer Macbook Pro with the M1 Max supports four external | displays. | cschep wrote: | The author just figured it out and shared already, no need to | figure it out! | Kalanos wrote: | it's absurd that a $2K machine is dependent on plastic dongles to | do basic stuff | cschep wrote: | The material they are made of is an interesting thing to call | out here. Does it offend you that this $2k machine also relies | on plastic keys on its keyboard? | Kalanos wrote: | these ports should be part of the motherboard | wtallis wrote: | OP's goal was to connect multiple monitors with one cable, | so adding more ports would be of little or no use. | jsjohnst wrote: | I've had zero issues using two 27" LG 5K monitors with my M1 Max | (personal) or M1 Pro (work). Expensive setup for sure, but it | _just works_ and the amount of pixels is just glorious. | rcarmo wrote: | I'm plugging my M1 Pro directly into a 38" LG monitor with PD | (which then has USB out, gigabit Ethernet, audio, etc), which | saved me a lot of trouble. | | (also, what's with the weird, slow CSS transforms?) | pelagicdev wrote: | The monitor has an ethernet port or you're using a USB-C | adapter for that? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-04 23:00 UTC)