[HN Gopher] Sony A1 Complete Disassembly and Teardown ___________________________________________________________________ Sony A1 Complete Disassembly and Teardown Author : giuliomagnifico Score : 93 points Date : 2022-03-05 17:10 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (kolarivision.com) (TXT) w3m dump (kolarivision.com) | bombela wrote: | What's wrong with scrolling on this website. It keeps jumping | around as I am trying to read. | RistrettoMike wrote: | It's incredible to me to that while this, a slightly older DSLR, | and a classic SLR film camera all have similar silhouettes and | ergonomics you can watch the digital technology replace the | insides over the last 25 years. | | It's a stark comparison to see the ribbon cables and stacked | daughter boards under the rear panel here where the film reels | used to live. No greater takeaway here, just incredible to see a | common form stay similar in many ways externally, yet have it's | internals so totally overhauled. | BolexNOLA wrote: | Hate to be that guy, but ackshooaly it's a mirrorless, not a | DSLR. | justinpowers wrote: | Agreed. I wonder why? | | Maybe professionals prefer the familiar ergonomics? | | Or there's a certain prestige carried by the traditional camera | silhouette? | | No idea. And I can't think of another analog-to-digital | transition that also maintained its outer form so thoroughly. | sudosysgen wrote: | Well, DSLR/MILCs really aren't that different from film SLRs. | The sensor replaced the film to be exposed, and the battery | replaced the film cannister. For mirrorless cameras the EVF | replaced the reflex mechanism. Everything else is the same, | so with similar design constraints it makes sense a similar | form factor would emerge. | fleddr wrote: | There are no other options I can think of. | | Sensors on full-frame DSLR/Mirrorless systems are large so | you're going to have to keep a significantly sized rectangle | clear. | | Assuming right-handed use, you're going to extend that | rectangle to the right for a grip, that also need to have | depth. Not optional as any of these cameras might see some | very heavy lenses attached to them. | | You need a viewfinder, where the only logical option is on | top. Same for flash connections. The only alternative is no | viewfinder at all, just the back screen, but this can't be | done because sports and wildlife photographers will always | require an eye piece. | | All connections (video, mic, data, remote flash) have to be | on the left as the right side is taken for the grip which | typically features the memory card slots. | | The bottom of the camera has to be flat, it needs to support | tripod use, video brackets and battery grips. Realistically, | the battery chamber can only be at the bottom, given that all | other space is already used. | | Concluding, the layout makes sense. You could move around | connections but it doesn't change the shape of the camera, | nor does it improve anything. So it's a logical timeless | design, not really a prestige thing. | | As somebody else already said: the old design was not | specifically analog, only the internals were. | mrandish wrote: | I have one of these and it's an amazing device. | voisin wrote: | What made you buy this over say a Nikon or Canon? | asdfasgasdgasdg wrote: | Which Canon or Nikon? There are a number of different | mirrorless cameras from the three major manufacturers of full | frame cameras, not to mention other camera systems like APS-C | or Micro 4/3. There is not a generic brand advantage from one | manufacturer to another. | | An A1 would not be your first Sony camera even if you decided | to buy Sony. It's a professional camera, and it's | professional in the sense that it has features needed by | professionals. It won't automatically make your pictures any | better if you use it vs. something less expensive. If you | have mad money, then go for it, but understand that you're | more or less just burning cash for next to no reason. | | For an amateur (i.e. anyone who is inclined to ask which | camera to choose by brand name), all three brands have | cameras that are more than sufficient to meet your needs. | Among Sony full-frame devices, the current gen choice would | be an A7 IV. Or if you're smart, you'd save yourself some | money and buy an A7 III instead. | | The main question is not "which brand makes the best camera" | but, "which brand has the lenses I want." And the proper way | to think about lenses for an amateur is to think about their | speed, focal length (zoom level), price, and "convenience" -- | weight, size, weather sealing. | [deleted] | LegitShady wrote: | this is an incredible feat of engineering and manufacturing. | sudosysgen wrote: | I partially disassembled my Sony A7ii a year ago to repair it, | it's interesting how the A1 is largely similar yet different. | jacquesm wrote: | Did you manage to re-assemble it and did it work? | sudosysgen wrote: | Yes, it did. Still using it to this day! But I did not | disassemble it all the way. I had to get to the motherboard | to fix a broken screen flex cable as well as change the SD | card reader, and took the opportunity to explore a bit more. | | The general architecture of the device was identical. | However, the motherboard of the A1 seems significantly more | complex and cluttered. Beyond that, the structural elements | are much more intricate in the A1 and are skeletonized, | certainly in an effort to save weight. Generally speaking | however, it's crazy how the overall designed stayed so | similar. | | It was a joy to disassemble and put back together. It was | clear that it was designed to be serviced. | jacquesm wrote: | Cool! For years I had a box with the parts of a Sony | walkman that I had disassembled and was going to put | together again 'one day'. The box got lost during a move | and I was secretly relieved. It went real well until that | one screw and then ' _sproing_ ' instant Japanese puzzle. | | I got better at that sort of thing over the years but this | camera looks extremely fragile and sensitive to dust once | you get to the guts of it, you'd need a very clean | environment to work in. | sudosysgen wrote: | The way these cameras are designed, dust getting in is | sadly inevitable in the field - every time you change a | lens, there is no helping it, dust will accumulate. As a | result there was a small amount of dust inside already | when I opened it despite taking very good care of it and | regularly cleaning the sensor. | | Indeed, the camera is made in a "sandwich" architecture, | where the shutter is layered onto the sensor, which is | layered onto the IBIS unit, itself layered onto the | motherboard. | | Since the sensor has to move substantially to stabilize, | and that the shutter is connected to the motherboard | without any sealing at all, there is more than enough | clearance for dust to get into the motherboard, and it | will inevitably happen. | | Because of that I expect the guts to be very dust | resistant (otherwise we'd see them dropping like flies), | because there is really no way of protecting against dust | ingress through the lens mount. | | The electronics itself seemed fairly robust - thick, high | quality PCBs. The most sensitive component, the sensor, | is encased behind a (removable) glass protective layer. | There were no unnecessary cables inside, most electrical | connections were done with spring-loaded contacts that | would connect to the appropriate PCB. | | That being said, the shutter and the IBIS system did look | _very_ fragile, like a Japanese puzzle indeed. I wouldn | 't attempt any repair that required messing with them. | jacquesm wrote: | My brother repairs this stuff regularly, I'll ask him if | he has any usable tips on working on this sort of device. | Though he usually only starts seeing them after they've | been in the field for a while. At his recommendation I | got an alpha here and so far it has been amazingly | robust. | sudosysgen wrote: | Hopefully, I will never need those tips anymore, but I'd | love to hear about your brother's experience with it! | Congrats on the Alpha, hopefully you take many great | photos on yours - I've taken a few dozen thousand on mine | and it's still going strong! | jacquesm wrote: | I'm using mine for video, and it has been running for | many 1000's of hours already without a glitch. | eezurr wrote: | Just want to point out your accessibility icon is blocking the | text on mobile. | | Edit: and now im getting 403 inaccessible resource. | | Edit 2: Works on my computer, still not on mobile. It appears | clicking the handicap /accessibility icon on mobile flags the | user as a bot or something. Other than scroll, that's the only | thing I interacted with on the webpage. | giuliomagnifico wrote: | I think the server is momentarily offline, but I'm not the | owner of the site and I'm not involved with Kolarivision. I | just found it on the web! | | PS: the 403 could be the "Hacker News effect" =] too much | traffic. I hope the server will be available again soon, it's a | very interesting read/view. | jacquesm wrote: | This reminds me of a joke about a magician and a very expensive | watch. | | I wonder if they managed to put it back together again. | user_7832 wrote: | They mention they've disassembled similar cameras in the past | and are aware of the costs, so either they know how to put it | back or (unlikely) they don't care about it. But it's not | something unexpected for them. | amelius wrote: | They made photos of how they took it apart ;) | tromp wrote: | Also at the less overloaded | | https://petapixel.com/2022/03/05/sony-alpha-1-teardown-the-i... | giuliomagnifico wrote: | Thanks! | Manuel_D wrote: | For similar photo/video teardown goodness, check out LTT | disassembling and water-cooling a RED cinema camera: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFrK-l3VSzY | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imJ9QgOJHzY | libpcap wrote: | Are the A1s still manufactured in Japan? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-05 23:00 UTC)