[HN Gopher] Medical student surgically implants Bluetooth into o... ___________________________________________________________________ Medical student surgically implants Bluetooth into own ear to cheat in final Author : softwarebeware Score : 395 points Date : 2022-03-14 17:57 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.independent.co.uk) (TXT) w3m dump (www.independent.co.uk) | cushychicken wrote: | In a roundabout way: surgically implanting electronics arguably | qualifies the perpetrator. | | Though, I suppose if this was a test of their skill in cosmetic | surgery, then detection certainly _would_ count as a failure. | boomboomsubban wrote: | First, there's no reason to think the student implanted it | themselves. | | Second, I think most amateurs could probably cut someone open, | put something in and stitch it up. Not causing further | complications would be the hard part. | endisneigh wrote: | Should've just used Anki religiously for a year or so instead. | | Speaking of cheating though, I heard they have directional | speakers that have a spread of only like a foot. With something | like that it seems like it'd be easy to cheat. | gowld wrote: | 11 years, per the article. | jerf wrote: | "Speaking of cheating though, I heard they have directional | speakers that have a spread of only like a foot. With something | like that it seems like it'd be easy to cheat." | | Yeah, but they still spread enough to be audible, and the | reflections are audible as well. In a testing environment it | would be hard to completely hide. | | I'm surprised so many people speak of these as something they | haven't experienced. I recall at least two grocery stores I've | been in using these to beam ads at people while they were in | line, and that was years ago, and I'm not in SV either, it's | not like people around here use cutting edge tech for the heck | of it very often. Mercifully, they didn't last long. While I | didn't enjoy the ads, I did enjoy the opportunity to hear | exactly how they work and get a sense of their strengths and | weaknesses. | | (It is absolutely true that they are _garbage_ at bass | frequencies, and the lower midrange as well. The ads were all | voiced by women, because I 'm not sure men would even have been | comprehensible. I mean that literally. Their lowest frequency | response is that high. As clever as they are it's not a | surprise we don't hear them more often. They are super | specialist gear not suitable for most tasks.) | beebmam wrote: | Cheating in college should be punishable with prison and heavy | fines. It's essentially fraud. I certainly don't think doctors | who earn their credentials through cheating should be allowed to | practice in any sense | pjbeam wrote: | You want to take someone's freedom for cheating on an exam? | That doesn't sit well with me at all. | tylergetsay wrote: | Theres no freedom to be a doctor | beebmam wrote: | The same could be said for people who fudge numbers to lie | about income. Yes, honest society deserves to be protected | from these frauds. | oceanplexian wrote: | If cheating with some bluetooth headset actually worked, | something is deeply broken with your academic system. All that | it proves is that you give out participation awards to people | who can memorize facts over actual problem solving. | Memorization doesn't take a lot of intelligence. | ghaff wrote: | My understanding is that there is quite a bit of memorization | associated with certain things in medical school such as | anatomy. | digitallyfree wrote: | If the implant played back an audio recording of his notes or | something, then sure. But if it allowed the student to | communicate with a medical expert during the exam, then even | an open-book exam not requiring memorization could be | exploited that way. | tmp_anon_22 wrote: | Its an open secret that tutors do a significant portion of work | for star athletes, to say nothing about punishments being | different for international students caught cheating. | slothtrop wrote: | Cheats are usually foreigners who pay more tuition, so they | tolerate it. Pay-to-win. | cgrealy wrote: | There's a shocking amount of racism in this thread. | mbg721 wrote: | If I've learned anything from Columbo, it's that college | students who cheat on exams eventually bite off more than they | can chew by rigging their Jeep to shoot their criminology | professor, and get their comeuppance from a wily homicide | lieutenant who pretends to be their clueless buddy. So really | you just have to bide your time. | ugh123 wrote: | Great episode! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2maqg-LSE5s | pessimizer wrote: | I think that cheating also causes a lot of programs to _price | cheating in_ , i.e. make the course harder because the cheating | they don't detect gives them excessive expectations of | students. | | I saw this in my CS program (and heard about it from other | programs.) None of the classes taught people to program, they | just expected people to know how already, and as a pretense | assigned everyone a programming instruction book (in the | program's official language) that was never covered through | lecture. The non-programmers would immediately start falling | behind and cheating together to tread water. I definitely saw | people graduate who had no ability to program; they were busy | enough figuring out how to cheat. | | an aside: CS programs are spoiled by hobbyist programmers like | me who learned for fun when they were children, and they act as | if everyone was a hobbyist. Plenty of people entering CS were | just comfortable with math and liked playing video games. They | foolishly expected to learn how to program at programming | school. | pugworthy wrote: | I guess with my fully BTE integrated hearing aids I'd be | suspected of cheating. If they even knew I had them on. | | If you're not familiar with modern behind the ear hearing aids, | Bluetooth is pretty common on better ones. It's like ear buds in | an extremely discrete for that also happen to help you hear | normally. | beeskneecaps wrote: | That's so interesting. I (and I imagine many other people) | wouldn't have the guts to confront you about removing your | hearing aid, even if I knew that they had bluetooth | capabilities. | thraway3837 wrote: | Must be from a wealthy family to afford medical school for 11 | years. What kind of lie do you even tell the person who writes | the checks? And wouldn't be it awkward AF to be 11 years older | than everyone around you when students are 17-21? Even more | embarrassing to have every staff and professor know you for this. | | The whole university and community knows, what are you really | benefiting by keeping their name private. Publicize their face | and name. Plaster it on every news site. Nobody wants a doctor | who cheated in medical school. Also surprising because | universities have dual tracks for graduating that most people | don't know about. If you are wealthy or well connected, you get | to graduate regardless of academic performance. Some professors | also get kickbacks, threats, stopped favors if students aren't | allowed to graduate. Perhaps the current administration of the | school is not politically or power aligned with this student's | connections? | raincom wrote: | Another story [1] from 2017, where some guy who already cheated | to become an IPS officer, tried to cheat again to become IAS. IPS | (Indian Police Service), IAS(Indian Administrative Service), etc | are legacy of the British Raj and their ICS (Indian civil | service). Once you get through these exams, you will end being | the top level bureaucrats in India. These officials collude with | ministers to become super rich. | | https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ips-officer-caught-che... | bitwize wrote: | If he did it himself I think he deserves extra credit, even if he | gets a zero on the exam. | MichaelRazum wrote: | Oh boy. There are obvious better ways... | chucknthem wrote: | YC interviewer: "Please tell us about the time you most | successfully hacked some (non-computer) system to your | advantage?" | | Medical student: "one time I hacked my ear..." | newsclues wrote: | The failure of ethics is most troubling, because how can we solve | it? | textcortex wrote: | Just give the guy the Diploma, he deserved it :) | whateveracct wrote: | Not surprising. A lot of med students are status- and money- | seeking people first and foremost. | | That's why you gotta shop around for doctors when you can and | evaluate them as people. | ramesh31 wrote: | At what point will we start to accept human cybernetic | enhancement as legitimate? We are literally one technological | step away from all humans being able to communicate | telepathically. Society is going to have to adapt to this | reality. If a test can be gamed this easily, then it is a very | poor test and I would not trust its' filtering ability at all | moving forward. Rote learning will be a thing of the past once we | are all augmented with the entirety of human knowledge accessible | by thought. | oblio wrote: | We are "one technological step" away from many things. | | Fermat's last theorem was formulated in 1637 and proven in | 1995, 358 years later. In those 358 years we can assume that at | least 4 very long lived generations of people lived (more like | 6-10 based on average life expectancies at the time). | | Being "close" to something doesn't mean anything. Doing it is | the real challenge. Everything before that is wishful thinking. | cgrealy wrote: | Even if we don't have direct computer to brain comms yet, the | fact remains that most people now have constant access to any | information accessible on the internet. | | At some point, we are going to have to figure out how to test | understanding instead of knowledge. | | I distinctly remember being asked "what is the win32 function | that does X" in an interview many years ago. My answer was | "no idea, that's what msdn is for". | CraneWorm wrote: | > Students getting caught in mass cheating or deploying sly means | to not get caught is not uncommon in India where competition is | fierce as aspirants outnumber the number of vacancies for a job | and seats in colleges for courses. | | I'd like to read a long form piece on this subject. What's being | done about it? India is a huge country, they need specialists no | doubt! | genedan wrote: | Economically, this puzzles me. I'd think that if quantity | supplied were so high the equilibrium wage would drop to the | point where excess people would stop trying to become doctors, | or at least to the point where surgically implanting things | wouldn't be worth the hassle. Is there something in India | propping up wages for those professions? | SkittyDog wrote: | Because it's not a "free market". The supply of doctors is | legally limited... It's illegal to practice medicine without | being licensed. And the number of licenses granted is | limited. | | The license limits could be direct, like taxi medallions in | New York City... Or the limits can be indirect, like how the | AMA defines the number of medical residencies in the United | States. | | Even in supposedly "free market" countries like the United | States, we often have significant restrictions on all sorts | of markets. The reasons vary. | sdeframond wrote: | Maybe the number of licenses issued is limited by law? It is | the case in France for example. | thawaya3113 wrote: | What matters is not the number of doctors but the number of | doctors per capita. | | India has both low number of doctors per capita, and low | supply for educating doctors. | SQueeeeeL wrote: | You'd also think the 40 hour work week would be a thing of | the past with automation. People are just very good at | building walked gardens and elite communities while forcing | others to be "lower class" | lotsofpulp wrote: | I would bet the demand for people highly educated and | trained in medicine far exceeds the number of people able | or willing to become highly educated and trained in | medicine. | engineeringwoke wrote: | What would make you think that? The supply of doctors is | artificially restricted in every country that I know of; | it's pretty much a universal mark of privilege. In the | United States, residency spots basically don't grow and | it's very good for over-allocating doctor's salaries. | Same in Germany, where they love their well-paid doctors | and big hospitals. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Based on how much discipline (or lack thereof) people | have to learn. Or maybe simply lack the innate ability. | Not even all the people motivated enough to pass all the | hurdles to get into medical school graduate from medical | school. | | That is not the perfect proof, but I am also coloring it | with my anecdotal data about which percentage of kids | were enthusiastic to learn any advanced topics in school | such as math, physics, chemistry, much less memorize a | metric ton of advanced biology information. | | It is true that supply is artificially restricted in the | US, of course. In many ways, not least which is an | unnecessarily expensive and lengthy certification | process. But I cannot imagine anyone with the average | discipline being able to come close to a full fledged MD. | SkittyDog wrote: | I can understand why you might think this, but you're | factually incorrect in this case. | | In the United States, the supply of medical doctors is | artificially limited by state laws that prohibit the | practice of medicine without a license. Licensing | requires successful completion of an accredited medical | residency program, which on turn requires completing an | MD degree from an accredited medical school. The American | Medical Association and similar state-level groups | effectively control the number of residency and med | school slots by controlling the accreditation process. | | Most of the rest of the world has similar systems in | place, including India. | | On the one hand, the AMA system has been described as a | means of guaranteeing the quality of doctors, and | preventing unsuspecting patients from being hurt, killed, | or defrauded by poorly trained doctors. | | On the other hand, it's also been described as cartel | designed to allow doctors to charge inflated prices for | medical care, by limiting the supply of doctors, and | extracting unreasonable rent from the public. | | Most economists would agree that both descriptions are | basically correct. | trophycase wrote: | It's kind of a common thing these days to pretend like | anybody is smart enough to do anything. | daniel-cussen wrote: | In Chile it's not artificially restricted, or to anything | nearly the same level. Doctors can still make a lot of | money, they just have to be really good. Medicine then | becomes 10-100 times cheaper, in that range. | | German doctors I believe make under 100 grand. | engineeringwoke wrote: | Before specialization, yes. And private practice is a lot | more, but getting the license is a pain. However, that is | still very well paid in a country where you have such | great benefits. The American sticker price salaries are | not honest when you have to pay for so many things out of | pocket (healthcare and education, just to start). I have | lived and worked in the US and EU. | pempem wrote: | The ability to immigrate elsewhere with incentives skills | from countries not incentivizing the growth of their own | medical field for a number of reasons. | [deleted] | gunfighthacksaw wrote: | It's unfortunate because the exam cheater is such a prevalent | stereotype, yet I have worked with many people from India who | were deep thinkers with a love of their subject. | | I wonder how many potential visionaries get filtered by | association with these cheaters as well as more traditional | racism. | conradev wrote: | This is a problem in the US: | https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4561/does-the-a... | colinmhayes wrote: | The doctor shortage in the US is because current law | effectively limits the number of residency slots to 100k, | pushing out foreign graduates who may have earned a spot and | causing medical schools to expand slower than they would like | due to fear of not matching graduates. | YossarianFrPrez wrote: | "The Mystery of India's Deadly Exam Scam" is an excellent piece | on the subject: | https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/17/the-mystery-of... | supercheetah wrote: | The hyper competitiveness seems to be a problem. I'm not sure | what the answer is, but students need a way to be able fail | honestly without shame so that when they do succeed, they do so | without needing to cheat. | kodah wrote: | He'd been taking the test for 11 years, that seems like | allowing them to fail honestly. | to1y wrote: | He started at the university 11 years ago. | firebird wrote: | It's a cultural thing. It's literally a do or die situation | for everyone to do well in school. Or you would have shamed | your family. But, things are getting better, as cultural | expectations are subsiding. I think in the next couple | decades, India will be on par with the West in terms of | social expectations as the average gross income and GDP of | the country continues to go up. I think China is starting to | see the same thing now. | sonicggg wrote: | This is probably way more pervasive than we imagine. | | Several years ago they uncovered a large SAT cheating scheme, out | of Thailand. They even made a movie about it : | https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bad_genius | | And that was using way more rudimentary technology. There are a | lot of rich kids willing to pay their way to a deegre. | eligro91 wrote: | I'm having cochlear implant and I'm able to hear sounds using a | neckloop same as displayed in this video | https://youtu.be/Gu2C6frbW18?t=130 | | So basically I'm able to control my processor and during boring | meetings or family events, I can switch to T mode and listen to | music / podcasts, without anyone noticing that. I can even having | it balanced.. 50%/50% , or 80% / 20% etc.. | | I'm sure that it would be so useful in cheating in exams.. hard | to identify.. you have aid hearing, they never expect you will | cheat with that. | | I'm wondering what will happen if Deaf people will be caught | doing that? they won't be allowed to hear at all during exams? | matt_s wrote: | Can a deaf person be a surgeon if their mode of communicating | is with their hands? | | That sounds cool to be able to tune out of boring meetings | easily. I imagine the number of podcasts you can listen to is | more than most people, any favorites related to software? | jupp0r wrote: | Time for exams that test your understanding of the field instead | of just test whether you have crammed a lot of unrelated facts | into your brain. | [deleted] | twayt wrote: | A lot of people are missing the bigger point here. | | This person was just one who got caught. The likelihood that | they're the first one to think or do this is very low. | | There are probably more sophisticated ways of using tech to cheat | and I would be very surprised if they haven't been employed in | high stakes exams like this before. | eunos wrote: | In a few decades, critical exams might be held in rooms that | practically are Faraday cages. | praptak wrote: | Also a full body CT scan in case the device is self- | contained. | [deleted] | thrdbndndn wrote: | "High stake" exams in my country already have radio jamming | devices for years. | busyant wrote: | About 5 years ago, I had 3 students who worked as a team to | cheat. | | * The ringleader placed his iPhone under his leg. | | * He would lean back in his chair and hold the exam sheets up | in the air. It looked a little unusual, but it (initially) | seemed innocuous. | | * What he was really doing was pointing the sheets _downward_ | toward the camera peeking out from under his leg. | | * He was broadcasting the exam to God-knows-where. | | * He and the other two students then received answers via tiny | earpieces. | | * In addition, the two other students would call me over to | "ask clarification questions." In reality, they were trying to | distract me while the ringleader broadcast the exam. | | * I eventually realized they were cheating (after exam 1), but | I couldn't figure out how, until another student (exam 2) | approached me with a note that read, "The guy to my right has | his phone under his leg. Every time you circle the room, he | pushes it completely under his leg so you can't see it." | | * At that point, however, each student was taking a slightly | different exam (unbeknownst to them). | | The ringleader emailed me at the end of the semester and said | something to the effect of: "I know I don't deserve to pass, | but if you fail me, I will have to stay an extra semester." | | I ended up failing all three. | pastaguy1 wrote: | I proctored an exam once in an auditorium. You could kind of | see over the person in front of you's shoulder even though | they sat every other seat or whatever. I'm pretty sure there | was a group of friends sitting in a six deep echelon | formation as some kind of cheating daisy chain but I could | never prove it. | mehphp wrote: | Failed? I'm surprised expulsion wasn't on the table. | jcranmer wrote: | A teacher failing their students involves _a lot_ less | paperwork and formal proceedings than going through the | expulsion process. Given how busy they tend to be, signing | up for all of that extra work isn 't an inviting | proposition. | yarky wrote: | Exactly, that's one of the main issues I encountered in | "academia" : you're expected to play along and ignore | cheating because the goal is to have more students for as | long as possible, not less. | busyant wrote: | > I'm surprised expulsion wasn't on the table. | | Couple of points that I omitted. | | First, I was teaching at a local community college. The | students were from a nearby university. They were trying to | avoid the equivalent classes at their own school and I | assume they felt that I might be an "easy mark." I'm not | sure what my options were with respect to reporting them to | their own university. | | Second, I was an adjunct at the community college. I | informed the Dean of what was going on, but I got zero | support. I could tell that the Dean felt that all I was | doing was bringing him a problem that had the potential to | mushroom into a political nightmare (no upside, only | downside for him). The unspoken message that I got was, | "Just deal with this on your own and don't turn it into a | federal case." I don't know if the lack of support was due | to me being an adjunct or whether it was due to "We need to | keep our enrollment numbers up. Don't get a reputation for | being a ball-buster." | BeFlatXIII wrote: | Tuition-paying and academic integrity are inherently at | odds with one another. If every student has earned their | place via scholarship, you can kick them out freely to | reallocate the scholarship pool toward students who | haven't gotten caught cheating. For students paying their | own way, the thought they'd get expelled for cheating may | dis-incentivize them from applying even if they have no | concrete plans to cheat. | Trollmann wrote: | They weren't caught while cheating though. So maybe hard to | justify if they decided to go against expulsion with their | lawyers. | mordae wrote: | What fascinates me is that everyone always separate into just | two camps: | | 1. Cool! Tell me more! I love these puzzle/strategy games. | Both how to cheat and not get caught and how to catch the | cheaters. | | 2. Wow, these cheaters are such a bad people. Isn't it unfair | to those who don't cheat...? | | For once, I would love for someone to step back and ask: | | What the actual fuck is going on here? | | Some people are apparently spending up to 11 years (on top of | high school) trying to get a certificate, that would help | them maintain certain socioeconomic status. Other people are | actively preventing them in getting the certificate in other | ways than the official ones. | | This costs an incredible amount of money. The whole overhead | is insane. Whole lot of people routinely spend several YEARS | without actually receiving the certificate. College education | is crippled, because it needs to prevent fraud first, teach | people useful things second. | | Can't we do the sensible thing and lift the minimum income | high enough so that only those who want to study will go to | college and do so without fear of missing out? | cryptonector wrote: | > What the actual fuck is going on here? | | Medicine is a large topic. It requires many years of | memorization, experience, etc., and then it requires | continuing education and constant practice. This makes the | costs of medicine very high. | | There is an opportunity for technology to help lower costs. | The opportunity was identified decades ago, when the first | work was done on expert systems for medicine. | | The problem is that this means that if we succeed at | applying technology to lowering the cost of medicine, it | will look a lot like patients self-diagnosing. In rich | countries we really don't like that. In poor countries | self-diagnostics is common. | periheli0n wrote: | I think money on the scale of a lifted minimum income is | not the issue here. | | These people want to achieve status. Minimum income | wouldn't help. | busyant wrote: | > Can't we do the sensible thing and lift the minimum | income high enough so that only those who want to study | will go to college and do so without fear of missing out? | | In my particular case, this was not an issue. | | I don't want to go into detail, but the students were from | a foreign country (this is part of why it was going to be a | political nightmare for the Dean). | | Two of the three could barely speak English (excepting the | ringleader). I mention this ONLY because it was a big | tipoff when reading their first exams: they all used | idiomatic English phrases that were far beyond what they | were capable of in casual conversation. They also used | nearly identical phrasing when explaining their answers | (another big tipoff). | | If anything, I blame their university for admitting | students who were incapable of succeeding _without_ | cheating. The whole escapade left me feeling dirty. The | university admits foreign students (because enrollment | /$$$). And they _have_ to know many of the TOEFL scores are | either unreliable or fraudulent. | 3np wrote: | > Wow, these cheaters are such a bad people. Isn't it | unfair to those who don't cheat...? | | This is not the sentiment I'm getting here. More like "wow, | I hope I don't get a cheater for a doctor, and if they go | into research they are likely to fake results in studies. | This is a unfair to society, their future employers and | subjects" | | It's not about fairness in the socioeconomic ladder as much | as the damage and cost incurred by having an incompetent | fraud in a high-impact professional role. | | While I agree with your sentiment, these people aren't | aiming for "livable wage" but for (from their perspective) | "the top". | GekkePrutser wrote: | This is what we did in the Netherlands. Anyone could afford | to study if they wanted to, and pay equalisation kept the | gaps low. Social housing provided good and cheap places to | live. | | Until neoliberalism hit though. Then everything was about | the market and the ideals of low pay gaps were budget cut | into oblivion. Now there's huge inequality and students | have to take out huge loans like in the US :( | grecy wrote: | > _Can 't we do the sensible thing and lift the minimum | income high enough so that only those who want to study | will go to college and do so without fear of missing out? _ | | Australia has a kind of free university for all. Australian | citizens get an interest free loan of about $5k/year for | tuition. You just pay it back by paying a little more tax | on your income over $47k/year until it's gone. If you don't | earn over $47k/year, you never pay it back, which is fine | and expected. It's also easy to get welfare for housing and | food as a student, so university is mostly "free". (For | various values of free) | | Even with all of that, plenty of people still cheat on | university exams. I was shocked to learn about it, but | there are always people who take that route. | rdtsc wrote: | Exactly. Then imagine the ones who didn't get caught enter the | workforce and are the ones performing surgery or other life | critical procedures. | fredoliveira wrote: | > and are the ones performing surgery | | In fairness, this one person proved they can do implants :') | mmaunder wrote: | The community at DEF CON and other hacking cons have been | playing with bio implants for some time, including low power | RF. I came here to point out what you just said - that they got | caught, which signals incompetence. | | I do think the bio-implanted device space is going to explode | at some point. Here's where I see us headed: | | * VR next. If you don't have an Oculus Quest 2 or realize what | a game changer it is in terms of price, power and wireless | usability, you really need to get one, no matter what you think | of Zuck and FB. It's the next thing. And it'll look clunky as | hell 5 years from now. It's the suitcase-sized laptop of the | early 90s. | | * Once very portable VR becomes a thing, augmented reality | wearable glasses. As in real-time, amazing visuals that are | seamlessly stitched into your reality, and so advantageous you | won't want to live without them. | | * Then bio-implanted augmented reality with wireless charging | through the skin. | | That's how I see the next 30 to 50 years unfolding in terms of | devices. The first step is VR as the next big platform play. | Incidentally I see three spaces there: | | 1. VR synthetic reality. [Already here and super fun and | useful] | | 2. 360 film [Already here but cameras getting WAY better very | fast] | | 3. Immersive vision-based augmented reality - visuals overlaid | on regular vision. [Not quite here - but we do have PoC's and | will be in the next couple years] | _0ffh wrote: | I suspect that after augmented reality wearable glasses we'll | transition to AR contact lenses first, and maybe even stay | there, before we go to full-on implants. | mmaunder wrote: | You're probably right. At the very least the market will | always exist as some folks just refuse to get a bio | implant. | pas wrote: | for true AR did anyone finally solve the problem of how to | make black light or it's going to go through a camera + | processing + display? | mmaunder wrote: | Try passthrough on Oculus Quest 2 to get an idea of how | easy this is to solve. It just uses the motion sensor | cameras and it's pixelated and black and white, but you get | some overlays and you can get a very good idea of how | quickly this will be solved in full 8k hidef with overlays | that look like they belong. | withinboredom wrote: | I've always wondered this too. Once they figure how to make | me feel like I'm sunbathing late night on the beach instead | of by my pool, I'm sold. | skykooler wrote: | A simple solution would be to have liquid crystals on the | glasses, like electronic auto-darkening sunglasses or | welding helmets. Of course, this could only change the | light level of the entire field of view at once (since it's | way too close to your eye to focus), but that's still | useful for many things. | boredtofears wrote: | > VR synthetic reality. [Already here and super fun and | useful] | | Is it though? | phkahler wrote: | >> VR synthetic reality. [Already here and super fun and | useful] >Is it though? | | Yes. The Quest 2 is incredible. No PC required, just a | headset and 2 hand controllers. Games give you a completely | immersed experience in a synthetic world where you can look | around, explore, play, talk to other players in real time. | | It is here and I would call it super fun, but not useful | (maybe that's what you were questioning). I think it may be | a fad like the Nintendo Wii, or it might hang around to | varying degrees. Maybe I lack imagination but I don't see | people wearing AR glasses in public or to work even if they | do become ultra-compact and awesome. | | Some people let their excitement lead them to believe "cool | fun new thing" is somehow the magical future. I played | Dactyl Nightmare (VR) back in the 1990's and have been | waiting for awesome home-VR since then and quest is every | bit of what I had imagined maybe it could be. But at the | end of the day, rec-room paintball is just Dactly or Quake | Arena. A 25yr old guy at work had to show me Mario Tennis | on his Switch - it's just pong with special moves and fancy | graphics. What's new is old, and I don't see any revolution | with VR outside of niche applications like training and | some visualization. Now get off my lawn while I go play | some EchoVR. | kelnos wrote: | > _Games give you a completely immersed experience_ | | I haven't tried the Quest 2 yet, so I don't know how good | it is, but to me, it's not "completely immersed" until | you can interface directly with my brain to feed it false | visual, auditory, smell, touch, etc. signals, as well as | interpret signals I make to move around, which causes me | to interact with the virtual world instead of the real | world. | | Anything else to me just feels kinda clunky. Certainly | the stuff available now is way better than stuff from 20, | 10, or even 5 years ago, but it's a far cry from complete | immersion. | GekkePrutser wrote: | It sure is clunky yes. It's certainly not totally | immersed. | | But it's so much more immersive than what we had before | that it's still really amazing. If you had skipped | computers in the 80s and 90s because they were nowhere | like perfect yet, you still works have missed out on an | amazing time. The same is happening now. | GekkePrutser wrote: | Yeah I too played Dactyl arena for like 1 minute at a | fair. Then I waited what 30 years for it to come to my | home. At least it finally did happen! | prometheus76 wrote: | Standing in your home office, sweating, with foggy vr | glasses, trying not to fall down or run into walls while | looking at low-poly NPCs coming at you, trying to use | bizarre, disembodied "hands" to keep them away. What's not | to love? | [deleted] | sandworm101 wrote: | Futurama did it. Implanted vision devices have been a few | years away, for decades. The nerve-wire interface isn't a | simple problem. | | https://youtu.be/uASUHbFEhWY | mmaunder wrote: | Gibson did it in Neuromancer in 1984 and others before | that. Even if the bio interface problem isn't solved, | lightweight wearables that encompass all your vision and | are super performant with a massive dev ecosystem and | incredibly useful will be a reality in a couple decades. | xorcist wrote: | Implants may be coming sooner or later but the rest of | society doesn't stand still, and as we extrapolate trends | into the future, one thing seems very clear: | | You will _not_ own the implants in your body. | | They will be owned by a separate third party. You may still | pay for them, and you may get some value out of the | proposition, but they will not be under your control. | | That's perhaps the most important aspect of our future. | hokumguru wrote: | So long as we live in a free market economy I would hope | consumers wouldn't be as stupid as to go that route. Sure, | with music, movies, and even electronic peripherals many | people go the rent vs buy route. I imagine however that | many more would have issues with ownership and bodily | autonomy if the items were actual physical implants. | vosper wrote: | > VR next. If you don't have an Oculus Quest 2 or realize | what a game changer it is in terms of price, power and | wireless usability, you really need to get one, no matter | what you think of Zuck and FB. It's the next thing. And it'll | look clunky as hell 5 years from now. It's the suitcase-sized | laptop of the early 90s. | | I just got a Quest 2, and totally agree. It's incredible for | what it can do for the price. And that it's untethered. | Anyone who's into tech or interested in the future of tech | should get themselves a Quest 2. The immersion level of games | like Superhot VR was totally mind-blowing to me. | | I also think it's the future of home workouts. If Peloton's | not working on a VR system then they'll be done in five | years. | mmaunder wrote: | Yeah Thrill of the Fight is one HELL of a workout. I keep | saying this and only those who have actually tried it get | it. | | And yeah totally agree - I think one of the biggest changes | here is the price. $300 is insane for what you're getting | out of the box. | bdamm wrote: | There's a line I can't cross; I _like_ being physical. The | Internet and its medusa of services already takes me away | from meaningful choices, why should I deepen that | connection that feels so overwhelmingly oppressive already? | ASalazarMX wrote: | Rest assured, nobody will force you. | | FWIW, I'm also wary of embracing full-time VR. I'd | certainly like augmented reality, but immersive VR feels | like too much yet. | trulyme wrote: | Is there something like Oculus but... Well, in control of the | user? Or at least less FB-y? | GekkePrutser wrote: | It will come. FB is investing the big bucks but once they | start seeing real success (and they are) others will see | the value and start competing for real. | gjs278 wrote: | Zenbit_UX wrote: | I suspect VR porn will be a huge driver of this technology. | The porn industry both has the money and the desire to push | the envelope into new offerings. | | I wouldn't be surprised if pornhub invests in VR in some way | in the next 5-10 years. | mmaunder wrote: | Yeah, while most people will avoid this conversation - they | were huge innovators in early eCommerce, and it's an | obvious use case. | | But there are also other super exciting applications like | dating e.g. a dating app facilitates the first date in VR | and is able to provide safety controls making first-dates | far more approachable and happen earlier on leading to more | successful relationships. | oblio wrote: | Well, if you think about it, they were a huge driver for | the web, so that would be just continuing the trend :-) | GekkePrutser wrote: | There's already a "pornhub" for VR called sexlikereal. You | can watch videos and even connect toys that are | synchronised with the video. The platform seems to be | getting pretty big and even produces some of their own | videos. | | PS explaining for a friend XD | reaperducer wrote: | There was a dystopian poem in the 1980's that ended with | someone unable to go to sleep at night because there was a | constant blinking red light when he closed his eyes from the | AT&T answering machine implant in his eye. | hammock wrote: | Earpieces were alleged during the last presidential | debates[1] (fact checkers said this was false), and other | places[2]. How would one detect an implant? | | [1]https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-10-05-biden-wore-wire- | with-... | | [2]https://twitter.com/3ree6ixty/status/1352444645125414913?r | ef... | Victerius wrote: | Put the presidential candidates in a debate room that's | actually inside a faraday cage. Use jammers to jam radio | signals. | LinuxBender wrote: | My personal preference would be to put each candidate on | multiple 3 to 4 hour long-form podcast interviews so we | can get some idea of what they are like. | bdamm wrote: | Would that actually mean anything in a contemporary | American election? Most of the electorate has an | attention span of about 30 seconds. | hammock wrote: | That being the case, one has to imagine that 30 seconds | taken from the final hour of a four-hour podcast (or, | potentially, anywhere in the middle) have the potential | to be quite different in insight than 30 seconds take | from the first hour. | | The longest period we have seen a presidential candidate | speak extemporaneously for is ~90 minutes (Biden town | hall) which is an exceedingly rare occasion that came | with pre-arranged questions and was mostly prepared | talking points anyway. | | One of the aims of a longform podcast would be to extend | the interviewee out beyond their prepared talking points | to see what happens. | Beltalowda wrote: | One of the big problems is that certain sections of the | press will just be hoping for you to fail, and will go | over every word with a fine comb to look for something to | moan and bitch about in the most bad-faith negative | interpretation possible. Furthermore you need to be a | renowned expert on any issue, cannot be seen to be | thinking about something for more than a nanosecond, | cannot hesitate in their answers, etc. | | We are asking for too much of our politicians, so they | will find ways to cope out of necessity, by limiting the | exposure. We all like to think that we'd do better, but | after being shafted by twats who call themselves | journalists a few times we'd all be doing the same. | dmurray wrote: | Or, accept that listening to and trusting a capable team | of advisers is perhaps a better qualification for the | role than thinking on your feet, and definitely better | than being able to recall which of your rehearsed sound | bites to use in response to which prompts. | msla wrote: | Were they alleged by anyone with a shred of credibility? | Natural News is somewhere below the late, lamented Weekly | World News in terms of being a news source you should take | seriously. | Beltalowda wrote: | Natural News is an extremely accurate source. Just take | anything written on the website, take the exact opposite | position, and you will be correct more often than night. | HWR_14 wrote: | 1) No credible source alleged that. | | 2) Those allegations have surfaced around every debate | since 2004 (or at least one debate every cycle) | | 3) Who cares if they were fed lines? Speechwriting isn't | their job, nor is memorizing numbers. | jamespo wrote: | What a fantastic selection of sources | basisword wrote: | You really don't need high tech to cheat in exams. I was | studying a few years ago (I was a mature student) and there | were a few kids who took 3-4 toilet visits in a 2 hour exam to | review notes on their phones after seeing the questions. The | school can't search you before the exam (i.e they can't stop | you carrying a phone) and they can't watch you in a toilet | cubicle. All these kids did well in their degree despite being | idiots in classes and lectures. | Maursault wrote: | > You really don't need high tech to cheat in exams. | | Although now ubiquitous, excluding two cups and a string, | phones have always been high tech, as opposed to low tech, | like feigning a need to use the restroom to develop their | cheating space, as obvious and overused as it is. I wonder | who first pioneered the fake bathroom visit for cheating, as | opposed to it being employed as an escape from the extreme | pressures of the classroom, i.e. smoking. | AlexCoventry wrote: | From the Fine Article: | | _Dr Anand Rai, the whistleblower in the Vyapam scam_ [of | 2008-2013], _said: "It is very easy to get Bluetooth fitted in | the ears. It is attached to the ear temporarily and can be | removed. Such a technique was used by a Vyapam scam accused too | to clear his medical exam eight years ago."_ | greggman3 wrote: | Whether the story is true or not, I think there's an even | bigger point. I believe augmentation is coming. There will be a | time in the not too distant future when disabling communication | for almost anything else will be near unthinkable. I can | imagine kids growing up with instant access to info and | communication via neural link to feel | threatened/stressed/horrified to be disconnected, similar to | tearing a child away from its parent. | | I'm not making a judgement whether that's good or bad. I'm sure | plenty will chime in with their opinion. I'm only bringing up | the world of always on computing is probably coming and schools | will need to find some other way to test students that don't | require handicapping them by removing what they perceive as | part of their brain. | throwawayboise wrote: | Sounds like the borg collective. No thanks. | [deleted] | Cpoll wrote: | If you get used to it at a young age, it probably won't be | the traumatic thing you describe. E.g. have Faraday cage test | booths in schools starting as early as Grade 1. | | Won't help much with recordings, of course, but that's more | like a cheat sheet that's always on you; if you can succeed | with it in a well-designed test environment, you can probably | succeed with it in real life. At some point, if you're | augmented, then memory is memory and there's no point in | distinguishing between hardware and wetware. | datavirtue wrote: | I feel like I'm cheating when I just memorize shit. I blame the | system if this many people are cheating. | duxup wrote: | The article says stories of cheating are common. | | I think the manner is what makes this story interesting. | ethanbond wrote: | Obviously cheating happens all the time. What GP is saying is | that this _manner_ might not even be that extraordinary. | kelnos wrote: | This was my first thought, but I'm skeptical this ends up being | as bad a problem as you imply. You don't just pass an exam and | then immediately get sent to an operating theater and given a | scalpel. You do a medical internship and residency, and are | supervised by experienced doctors. (Yes, I know, this is the US | system, but I'd hope the systems in other countries would be | similar, or at least provide similar protections.) I would | expect a cheater like this might not perform well enough to | ever make it into an operating room. And even if they did, it | would only be in an assistant role, where they would likely | show their incompetence pretty quickly. | | Sure, the system overall isn't perfect, but detecting | incompetence on the job ( _before_ being allowed to do any | damage) is IMO the most likely scenario for cheating medical | students who don 't get caught at school. | | Even if we consider other disciplines... say, civil | engineering. You don't get your degree and then immediately get | the job of Principal Engineer on a bridge-building project. | You're supervised by engineers with more experience, and your | work is checked and signed off on if it's correct. If your work | consistently fails those checks, you'll get fired. | moonchrome wrote: | >I would expect a cheater like this might not perform well | enough to ever make it into an operating room. | | Implying that material they are testing is relevant in a | practical setting ? I actually wonder if they ever do | something like random tests for people that are 5+ years into | their career - just unannounced testing to check retention | and relevance. | | If it's anything like CS I wouldn't be surprised if they | would fail >90% people. People here complain about having to | invert binary trees in an interview... | tomxor wrote: | An even bigger point is being missed... the underlying cause, | the societal pressure to get a degree in india is so great that | people will do almost anything. | FpUser wrote: | When I was in university we had that peculiar professor for | Quantum Mech. He would let you choose any question sheet and use | books to consult. And after you say you are ready he would | briefly look at your answers and will fry your brain with the | questions till you are dead. Usually all my university exams were | 4s and 5s out of 5. I got 3 on quantum mech and considered myself | extremely happy. Drank myself to death after that. Many of the | people would be just told go home, study and return some other | time. Phew. | | No gadget will save you from examiner like that one. | changoplatanero wrote: | i can't read the article cause it's paywalled. I wonder if he did | the surgery himself or had an accomplice | gs17 wrote: | The article doesn't seem to say for sure, but it implies it was | done by someone else. | FatalLogic wrote: | If he implanted it himself, that would imply impressive | surgical skills | | edit: paywall bypass https://archive.ph/CCXpf | jotm wrote: | Does it? Seems like being able to cut and stitch yourself is | the hardest part. | | Funny story, I dealt with a pylonidal cyst on my tailbone by | myself. I did not expect that much blood tbh (along with very | stinky puss... sorry for the detail), but I managed to drain | and clean it. | | Apparently you need surgery for those... it really wasn't | that hard, cutting in was the hardest part, but at that point | the pain from it was worse. | JasonFruit wrote: | It's pus, not puss. What you wrote could give a false | impression. | Goz3rr wrote: | There's an "I'll try later" button that removes the | register/login prompt. | steanne wrote: | > After questioning by the college officials, one official | reportedly said that he had a skin-coloured micro Bluetooth | device fixed in his ear by an ENT surgeon, reported Hindustan | Times. | | just don't take their javascript | prasadjoglekar wrote: | "After questioning by the college officials, one official | reportedly said that he had a skin-coloured micro Bluetooth | device fixed in his ear by an ENT surgeon, reported Hindustan | Times." | | This happened in India. The student was caught with a mobile | phone, which in turn led to further questioning. | [deleted] | [deleted] | 14 wrote: | When you hit a paywall you can try 12ft.io website just past a | link in the box and it removes the paywall. It works for most | paywalls. | FastEatSlow wrote: | The surgery was done by an ENT (ear, nose, throat) surgeon. I'm | not sure if it was within the ear or not, as the device was | "skin coloured", though that may be because of how thin the | ear's skin is. | scyzoryk_xyz wrote: | My first thought wasn't how did he do it, but how did he got | caught. | | Then it turned out that a squad came to interrogate and search | which sounds ridiculous. And then it turned out that he admitted | to it. And then _another_ student was caught with a non-implant | device. | | Sounds ridiculous | bredren wrote: | Bringing this home--there is a Pycharm integration for Leetcode | right now. | | But it is reasonable that any programmer familiar with the | assistance of an IDE would want the syntax highlighting, | formatting and more mapped into the browser during live coding | exercises. | toxik wrote: | Feel like it should've been a false tooth instead. Perhaps of | blue color. | chaostheory wrote: | They didn't find the headset initially. They found the phone in | an inner seam of his pants. I'm guessing that they used either | metal or other detectors | geoffeg wrote: | "Kent. Wake up Kent. I'm talking to you, Kent. This is Jesus, | Kent, and you've been a very naughty boy." | jotm wrote: | Why not just waterproof it and keep it in your mouth, maybe | temporarily affixed to a tooth... | recursiveturtle wrote: | There's a $1000 in there... or maybe there isn't. Know what I | mean? | dade_ wrote: | Dead maybe: Harald Bluetooth | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harald_Bluetooth | warrenm wrote: | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089886/ | arcticbull wrote: | With bone conduction audio via adjacent teeth, that would be | achievable, less invasive and probably easier to avoid | detection of. | | [edit] omg [1] | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoundBite_Hearing_System | samstave wrote: | And a poison gas, when you bite down, blow it into the face | of the Baron, and he will feel the revenge for killing my | wife. A revenge so storng, even the Mind Conditioning for | Loyalty cannot even contain my hate and revenge. | bduerst wrote: | If you're going to go the bone conduction route, then why not | just bluetooth glasses? | | https://www.amazon.com/bone-conduction- | glasses/s?k=bone+cond... | exikyut wrote: | From WP: | | > _SoundBite was developed and marketed by Sonitus Medical, | Inc. The company filed for bankruptcy on Thursday, January | 15, 2015,[1] as a result of the US Centers for Medicare & | Medicaid Services' decision not to cover the device.[2]_ | | :( | starwind wrote: | Thought you were talking about this at first: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3ca4tfXefk | arcticbull wrote: | now i'm just picturing the student trying to cheat using | one of these lollipops, haha. | Zenbit_UX wrote: | Seems like the company went out of business because medicaid | didn't cover it. I would be curious if such a device exists | that could pair with a phone or laptop. A broken tooth could | be capped with one of these false tooth implants and so long | as there's a hygienic way to remove and clean + charge it I'd | be very curious to try one. | swores wrote: | They weren't exactly as small and subtle as a false tooth: | https://venturebeat.com/wp- | content/uploads/2012/05/sonitus.p... and | http://rolandocabral.com/wp- | content/uploads/2011/07/soundbit... | mc4ndr3 wrote: | If the student had performed the surgery, that would have at | least counted for something. | jcadam wrote: | One of the wackier pitches in an early season of Shark Tank was | similar: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDkDg33uGuc | | My favorite part is when he describes the recharging procedure :D | snambi wrote: | It is published from UK. Probably a fake news story. | vjust wrote: | Maybe the dude needs to be working on a bio-tech / wearable- | computing startup... if he's willing to go this far. But I guess | its a moral stain. If its his 11th year, why not pass him for his | sheer persistence. | IncRnd wrote: | The medical student who found a surgeon to implant bluetooth in | his ear could have instead paid that surgeon for tutoring and | kept his ear canal open. | deutschew wrote: | this will become really popular in Korea | lmarcos wrote: | I still remember the exams I had to pass when I was studying | computer science. In some cases, professors let you take to the | exam any material, books or notes you wanted; the point was: You | are not going to pass the exam unless you understand the | concepts, so there is no room for cheating. | adhesive_wombat wrote: | Yep, an open book exam is basically the perfect weapon against | cheating. Plus for almost all subjects, including a lot of | medicine actually, memorising stuff is not helpful in the | field. If it's that important, you should double check anyway. | | The downside to open book exams is they can take a lot more | effort to mark. And actually paying attention to filthy | undergraduates is a bit _infra dig_ , dontcha know? | ookdatnog wrote: | When you have a direct line of communication with an | outsider, open book or not doesn't matter, it's literally | someone else taking the test for you. | granshaw wrote: | I remember those and they were such a breath of fresh air. Just | like coding interviews where you're allowed to lookup docs, | which is the case on the job | cortesoft wrote: | Yeah, I don't understand these sorts of memorization exams any | more than I understand the "code this without using the | internet" challenges for interviewing candidates... why is this | an important skill to have? | artful-hacker wrote: | "The devices have been confiscated and their answer sheets were | seized. They were given new answer sheets," he said. | | Unbelievable. They should have been banned forever. | gowld wrote: | It's pending investigation to document and confirm the facts. | | > An internal investigation has begun in the matter by the | university examination committee and devices have been sent for | examination. | | > After the conclusion of the investigation it would be | determined whether the case merits a police case for using | unfair means in an exam | inimino wrote: | They way they handled it was exactly the correct one. You allow | the test to continue with the minimum of disruptions for | everyone. The academic consequences come later, after a | university investigation, and they may face criminal charges as | well, but the people who didn't cheat deserve to have their | test proceed with the minimum possible disruption. | spywaregorilla wrote: | Minimum possible disruption is almost certainly taking him | out of the room? | ineedasername wrote: | Depends on how quietly he goes. Asking someone nicely who | went to such lengths to cheat might turn bad fast, and then | you're looking at the potential for physical altercations, | calling security, etc. | | Or you just give them another sheet and worry about | punishments later. | kenniskrag wrote: | the person is usually accused and maybe not guilty. Normaly | you let them finish the exam and start the legal stuff | afterwards (proof, counter arguments etc.) | Zenbit_UX wrote: | Indeed. | | It can also serve as additional proof if on the new | answer sheet given after confiscating the devices, the | exam taker performs significantly worse than on the | original answer sheet. | dharmab wrote: | Ever seen someone removed from a room who didn't want to | leave? It's not quiet. | thawaya3113 wrote: | I suspect the only people who can decide what would | minimize disruption are the people who were actually there. | inimino wrote: | The frisking could have been done one-by-one in an adjacent | room. But once you find the cheating, the best way is to | let the test continue as normally as possible. Otherwise it | creates a huge distraction for the other students as they | wonder why that student had to leave. | sodality2 wrote: | Actually doing nothing and stopping them on the way out | would be ideal, in my opinion. It gives them the chance to | get cocky ("woohoo haven't get caught yet let me ramp this | up a bit") and be more obvious about it, as well. (Unless | it's the kind of cheating that disrupts others, of course, | but hopefully it isn't?) | Frost1x wrote: | >they may face criminal charges as well | | Criminal charges for cheating on an exam? Seems a bit absurd | to me. I'm all for preventing fraud (especially when were | talking about peoples lives), but I also like to think I'm a | reasonable human being and criminal action seems unfounded | here. It sounds to me like expectations and filters for exams | are too unrealistic now combined with lack of alternative | realizable opportunities, otherwise you wouldn't see this | level of cheating nonsense. | | Every day I see more and more ridiculous levels of | competitive forces pushed on the bulk of society just to | survive and it makes me wonder where the tipping point for | social competitive forces for survival begin to exceed | natural forces for survival and faith in societies | destabilize to a point people just stop participating or at | the very least many just "give up." You already see this in | Japan, Korea, China (tang ping, "lying flat") and it seems to | be an increasing trend in the US. I'm not intimately familiar | with India but from what I have seen, it's not roses there | either. | | We have some fundamentally skewed power and control mechansim | increasingly governing people in 'democratic societies' to | which citizens seem to have little real democratic say in | anymore. | pessimizer wrote: | > Criminal charges for cheating on an exam? Seems a bit | absurd to me. | | Depends on how you think about it. They're defrauding the | institution out of a credential. It really depends on how | the relevant laws are worded. | | Would you expect criminal charges if you got caught | counterfeiting a lottery ticket? | | I find everything you said interesting, of course, but I | think the legal thing is slightly more complicated. | erosenbe0 wrote: | Cheating on licensure tests at publicly subsidized | institutions is hardcore fraud. Why should there be a carve | out for white-collar crime like that? | spoonjim wrote: | Cheating in a medical exam can get an unqualified person | licensed as a doctor. It can have serious consequences and | kill lots of people. In a regular college exam I think | criminal charges are a bit much but for a public safety | related exam like doctor, pilot, etc. I think it's | appropriate. | erosenbe0 wrote: | Adults are adults. 18 year-olds who defraud the military | face punishment (with due process). Nearly all | universities take public money and should stop treating | 18 year-olds like children who need to be coddled on | publicly subsidized dime. | | That being said, most such punishment records should | generally be expunged once rehabilitation has been | completed. We're all human and make mistakes, and only a | pattern of misconduct should be permanently on record. | VectorLock wrote: | If you've ever posted any job listings in tech recently you might | have seen first hand how pervasive "fake it til you make it" is. | bencollier49 wrote: | It pays off for those people because eventually they'll run | into a non-technical hirer, who'll take 2 months to realise | that they've made a mistake. Rinse and repeat. | engineeringwoke wrote: | There are institutions that are absolutely filled with these | kinds of people. It's pretty much a feature, not a bug, at | those places. They perceive themselves as "hustlers" and that | everyone else is doing it more than them. | VectorLock wrote: | I really want to call some of these places referenced on | their resume and see if they're outright lying or these | places have just departments of people who don't do | anything and people filling them just to get referral | bonuses or kickbacks from the people they're placing there. | oblio wrote: | Amusingly, there is also a huge cognitive dissonance between | | 1. people generally being against cheaters (and people also | generally acknowledge that there are statistically significant | amounts of cheaters) | | 2. people also generally (and probably with a decent overlap | with the 1st group) being against hazing-style complex and | difficult interview processes | rhines wrote: | I'm not sure what the dissonance is? It's much easier to | cheat in that sort of interview process than it is to cheat | in a more free-form discussion interview. Of course you can | simply lie in the latter, but assuming the interviewer is | worth their salt they'll be able to ask questions that will | be hard to answer if you don't have the experience you say | you have. Whereas for algorithms and coding trivia questions | you can search for answers online, have someone watching your | screen and sending answers, do this bluetooth embedded | approach, etc. | oblio wrote: | > but assuming the interviewer is worth their salt they'll | be able to ask questions that will be hard to answer if you | don't have the experience you say you have | | I'm not saying being a farmer and lying about being a | software developer. | | But a mediocre software developer with good social skills | can definitely bullshit through a top level software | interview, barring the strictest of interviewers. | owlbynight wrote: | Or if you've ever worked in tech, or interacted with any sales | teams. My wife is looking to make a career change and I told | her work in low level tech because it literally doesn't matter | what you know. Nobody will know what you don't know. | abledon wrote: | 'low level' tech ? like writing drivers and stuff in C? | VectorLock wrote: | Presumably he means "junior." | ChuckMcM wrote: | This is so sad. 11 years? You have have read, and re-read, every | textbook for your classes like 4 times over in that period of | time. It always astonishes me to see someone invest so much time | in cheating, when it would take the same or less time to just do | the damn work. What is worse, what happens when they have a | patient and they don't know what to do because they cheated on | that part of the exam? Let them die or become disabled? So very | very sad. | savant_penguin wrote: | That was the professor intent all along to teach students how to | implant devices. | | Just like when you are allowed a cheatsheet for the exam | awa wrote: | Non paywall story: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/mp- | student-gets-bl... | donatj wrote: | > A university squad of the Devi Ahilya Bai University came for a | surprise check and they found one student with a mobile phone and | another with some Bluetooth device | | It's been 15+ years since I've been in any sort of major exams. | Are surprise checks like this common these days? | [deleted] | bsenftner wrote: | I wager this guy is fielding calls from screenwriters about now. | This would be a good comedy. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | I'm extremely skeptical of this story, at least as written. | | It makes great clickbait, but it doesn't really make sense. | _Where_ would someone implant a bluetooth earpiece into their | ear? There 's not really a lot of empty space in that area unless | someone is very overweight and the device is implanted in layers | of fat adjacent to the ear, which aren't great at conducting | sound. Did someone really wrap an earpiece in some bio-compatible | material, put it in someone right before the test (battery life | is limited), and that person was then in a low enough level of | pain and/or on enough painkillers that they could still complete | the test? I'm extremely doubtful. | | But the bigger question is: What use is a 1-way communication | device? Did the student have a second cheating instrument to | photograph the test and send it to someone off-site? Or did they | have someone with the test answers reading them off in real-time | ("Question 34 - Answer is C")? It seems this would only be useful | in an extremely narrow set of circumstances, if it could be | pulled off at all. | | Really though, why wouldn't someone just grow out their hair or | wear a wig and put an earpiece under their hair? The idea of | surgically implanting something that could be easily concealed | seems like a modern urban legend. | dheera wrote: | I guess my question is, if your body has built-in superpowers | like Bluetooth or infrared vision or auxilary information | storage, why would it be illegal to use them if it would make | you a better doctor? | | Maybe the tests are not testing the right skills. | | As a patient I want to see the best doctor possible, and if | they have retrofitted their bodies to be more competent at | treating conditions I would totally want that. | thih9 wrote: | A bluetooth implant alone doesn't help that much. To be | effective the scam requires more, e.g. continuous assistance | from a third party. Will that doctor employ a third party | afterwards, i.e. for all duration of their practice? | munk-a wrote: | For instance, as a counter example, if you wired your brain | up to a hard drive loaded with an immense amount of medical | data that you'd be able to access at will for the rest of | your life (instead of learning most of that rote knowledge | through traditional sources) I wouldn't consider that | cheating. Assuming you're still sufficiently good at | critical thinking and problem solving then I wouldn't | really have any objection to a doctor who keeps his | knowledge of the krebs cycle on an instantly accessible | external storage device. | DonHopkins wrote: | Who doesn't want their own Personal Doctor Feelgood, who | prescribes as much Adderall as you can Snort, lets you | Dictate Glowing Health Letters, refers you to a Bone Spur | Specialist who gets you out of Being Drafted, shoots you up | with Penicillin whenever it Hurts When You Pee, then awards | you a Purple Heart for getting wounded by Vagina Landmines in | your Own Personal Viet Nam? | | https://edition.cnn.com/2018/05/01/politics/harold- | bornstein... | | https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/26/us/politics/trump- | vietnam... | | https://people.com/politics/trump-boasted-of-avoiding- | stds-w... | kemitche wrote: | Your assumption is that these cheating students will continue | to have an enabler with them through their entire career. | | Furthermore, your assumption is that a cheater will be the | best doctor. It's not about the method - it's about the | integrity. My assumption is that any person taking shortcuts | like this to get their degree will also take shortcuts with | my personal health, which is not a comforting thought. | | The scenario in the article is very different than a | potential doctor being upfront about having implants | installed to aid them in their duties. | throwaway0a5e wrote: | >it's about the integrity. My assumption is that any person | taking shortcuts like this to get their degree will also | take shortcuts with my personal health, which is not a | comforting thought. | | You're making generalizations based on proxy information, | which is basically the same thing that a test does you're | just using a different set of information to key off of. | | Not that there isn't some signal in the pile of noise that | you're picking through but a willingness to circumvent | academic requirements isn't exactly a strong indicator of | performance in the field. Competent professionals fudge | requirements they consider to be irrelevant all the time | (inb4 no true Scotsman). | blowski wrote: | If someone's caught cheating in an exam, I'd say the | burden of proof is on them not me. Especially if they're | intending to affect my health. | shukantpal wrote: | These are reasonable generalizations. | powersnail wrote: | Because Bluetooth is not superpower; the cheating part is the | other end of the communication feeding information to the | student. They won't be there when the doctor is treating you. | | Real doctors can already use external information anyway. | They just use the computer, no need to Bluetooth themselves. | kevinstubbs wrote: | Well if you read the article... "It is very | easy to get Bluetooth fitted in the ears. It is attached to the | ear temporarily and can be removed. Such a technique was used | by a Vyapam scam accused too to clear his medical exam eight | years ago." | | And the article also mentions that the Indian Supreme Court | themselves cancelled the licenses for 634 doctors licenses | issued between 2008 - 2013.. some of which used this same | technique. | | How it works, where does it go; I have no idea. But clearly | it's not a one-off case. | | P.S. I think that it's perhaps surgically clipped deep in the | inner ear somehow, and not inserted beneath the skin. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > Well if you read the article... | | I did, but how does this: | | > "It is very easy to get Bluetooth fitted in the ears. It is | attached to the ear temporarily and can be removed. | | ...answer the question at all? I'm asking about the "attached | to the ear" part and the surgical implant the article talks | about without a single detail. | | Surely if it's both easy and common then someone should be | able to find a picture of the device or the process. | nathanyukai wrote: | 1-way communication device are used in cheating all the time, | it involves of someone that's really good at exams taking the | same test, sneak out to the toilet and tell them the answers. | GekkePrutser wrote: | Bluetooth range on headsets is pretty mediocre though. | Especially when blocked by body parts. I've never done an | exam where the toilets were within Bluetooth range. | pricci wrote: | Another student had a phone with him/her. It might be | tethered to the bluetooth device. | tempnow987 wrote: | My licensing exam was computer adaptive. We were wanded, | turned pockets inside out, videoed. You couldn't eat, take | jackets on our off or anything. Lots of rules around how you | sat at the table. These must be a fair bit lower tech for the | cheating to work. You could wear earplugs and earmuf style | sound suppression which I did. Wouldn't be super difficult to | have audio in -> but I don't think it would have done much | good. | cortesoft wrote: | But aren't these sorts of tests usually randomized so that | people next to each other aren't taking the same exact test? | GekkePrutser wrote: | I've never seen that. Randomised per sitting yes. Within | the same sitting no. Usually for important exams the desks | are far enough apart. | [deleted] | Izkata wrote: | It was done regularly in my highschool in the 2000s, | there'd be two or three versions of the test and they'd | be distributed randomly. We'd know which one we got | because of a label in the corner, which was also how they | used the right key for grading. | | It'd surprise me if such a simple mitigation wasn't done | for more important exams... | oaktrout wrote: | Medical licensing exams in the US are randomized within | the same sitting, even having two examiners in the same | room receiving entirely different questions (not just | random question ordering). | Scoundreller wrote: | > What use is a 1-way communication device? | | Lots of dumb questions on exams that are predictable rote dumps | that take away from studying other material. | | E.g. a blank page that asks "Draw and label the Kreb's cycle. | Do not use abbreviations" | Izkata wrote: | > Draw | | Over audio, interesting challenge. | asdff wrote: | Easy for the krebs cycle. Playback the reactions in order | and just write them out in a circle then draw a big arrow | if you want | closetohome wrote: | Another article I found clarified that this was an induction | style micro earpiece (which google helpfully suggested | suffixing with "for cheating") that had apparently been | inserted by an ENT due to its size and depth in the ear canal. | No actual surgery involved. | | Since this is an incredibly common and mundane method of | cheating I'd have to say you're right, the headline is entirely | clickbait. | pkrotich wrote: | I'm skeptical as well... someone saw SpongeBob driving test | cheating episode [0] and decided to write an article. | | [0] - https://youtu.be/Zr7EodmMbmo | lhorie wrote: | "Surgical" doesn't necessarily mean invasive. It's most likely | a procedure similar to rhinestone implants[0]. | | As for why they use a 1-way device: this method of cheating has | been around for decades; you get someone to take the test, they | leave early and radio answers in. I don't know the specifics | for this particular exam, but India is certainly not the only | place in the world w/ extremely competitive admission exams. | Back in my days back home some twenty years ago, cram schools | would be on stand-by outside school doors, they'd smuggle | question sheet out somehow and flash-solve them / publish | answers on the spot for publicity. You could get a full answer | sheet online from a cram school website before the exam was | over (these exams are hours long) and test takers would | frequently do so after finishing their exams to see how they | did. | | [0] https://www.bodycandy.com/blogs/news/microdermal-implants- | bo... | tomc1985 wrote: | Maybe the earpiece transmits sound conductively? When I go to | the ENT's office, the audiologist does some tests on me with | conductive headphones and usually the point of contact is my | skull an inch or two from my ear | lordnacho wrote: | It reads like a cultural tall tale to me. | | First, the subject of Indians cheating on exams is something | that surfaces in Western news now and again. It's always said | that there's these crazy tough exams that determine your life | in India. For instance this guy apparently spent 11 years | trying to pass. Totally unlikely, who would do that? The point | seems to be to underline the importance of exams in India. | | Second, the method of cheating is some badly explained but | intricate mechanism. Badly explained in that the story is not | complete, how exactly is the Bluetooth used? Intricate in that | it's some weirdly complicated thing like getting an operation | to have this implanted. It's always something that sounds way | too complex to be worthwhile. | | Third, the authority in charge of catching the cheaters seems | oddly well appointed. Would you really send a special squad to | check these kinds of things? Sure, check for hidden notes and | phones. You really gonna check for Bluetooth? I mean maybe but | I doubt it. How could the guy have a crazy special plan for | implanting the thing in his ear but not have anything other | than an ordinary plan for smuggling in the phone? | | To me it reads like that story of a religious couple that don't | know how babies are made. Comes about now and again, makes us | chuckle, says something recognisable about society, but | ultimately sounds not quite true. | quenix wrote: | > To me it reads like that story of a religious couple that | don't know how babies are made. | | Which story are you referring to? | tialaramex wrote: | It's a recurring urban legend. Here's an example: | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/inconceivable-story/ | Johnny555 wrote: | Here's one of them: | https://boards.straightdope.com/t/religious-couple-doesnt- | kn... | brailsafe wrote: | I'd have to agree. I know enough people with super gauged ears, | that the most efficient way to accomplish this would be in | plain sight | 0des wrote: | If they did it themself just get them the green scrubs and the | rest will fall into place. | | Stackoverflow is about to get much more interesting. | codezero wrote: | You can bite on a bone conducting Bluetooth headphone and hear | reliably. This was just a dumb move. | skye-adaire wrote: | https://youtu.be/ntMYssVeyl0 | nonrandomstring wrote: | We are in an arms race now. Turnitin. Proctoring. Next? Airport | style security scanners at the exam hall. I wrote about this arms | race recently [1] and where it will lead. | | The problem is really that, under conditions of self- | commodification (reification), intrinsic motivation to learn and | be a better person is replaced by extrinsic motivation to appear | to be a better person. The experience (simulation) means more | than the reality - which is a general trend in Western society | now proved by the very existence of the company Meta. | | https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/we-cant-teach-... | robocat wrote: | I can understand one motivation to cheat: exam grading is very | unfair at the individual level because your performance has a | high variation depending on factors outside of your control. | Those factors are random from the perspective of a test taker: | the exact questions, whether you had a flu, family | circumstances, and hundreds of other factors that are | independent of your ability. Apart from the fact that exams | strongly measure the skill of passing exams, yet often poorly | measure actual ability for the subject. | | The unfairness depends on how steep the cutoff is: does 89.9% | mean you miss out on an important life goal, whereas 90.1% | means you win? | | I did a quick google to find facts on expected individual exam | mark volatility, but couldn't find anything - what keywords do | I need? | | One pattern to the results I did read is that individual | volatility is not even acknowledged - the unwritten assumption | is that exams are completely fair and volatility has other | dominant causes. | | Edit: I am an engineer type with some spectrum attributes and I | loath cheats, but over time I have seen how important some | "dark" skills are such as: deception, judging when to ignore | rules, and meta-games. In some roles or countries, perhaps | cheating is a good quality? There is a reason the best card | games are about deception. Cheaters are also risk takers, and | taking appropriate risks is associated with entrepreneurship. | Risks with extreme downsides are interesting. | CrazyStat wrote: | Based on my experience teaching I don't think individual | variability is that large. In a semester-long course with 3 | or 4 exams the top students and bottom students are mostly | consistent from exam to exam. | | That said, of course individual variability does exist. In | one graduate-level math class I misremembered one theorem | which caused me to immediately lose 40/100 points--there were | only 5 questions on the exam, and that theorem was central to | two of them. Had those two questions been different I | probably would have scored much better. I consider that a | poorly-written exam, though, since so much of the score was | dependent on recalling one theorem correctly. I somehow still | ended up with an A in that course, I can only assume through | either creative accounting or a generous grading curve. | | In any case, I don't know any other method of evaluation | which is _more_ fair than exams. Every method of evaluation | is subject to similar sources of individual variability and | some have other issues in addition. "Fair" in such cases is | a mirage. It's not like there's some other objective | evaluation that we can use instead of exams, just ones with | different biases. | jimbob45 wrote: | It seems to me that TurnItIn and proctoring take care of 99% of | problems in exams _if_ the exams are well-constructed such that | consulting hidden notes wouldn 't help much. | | The 1% of exams that remain problematic are the memorization- | style exams that maybe shouldn't still exist in the modern age. | imoverclocked wrote: | Sometimes memorization itself is important to a role. How | would you test for that, if not an exam that tests memorized | facts? | | From recent personal experience: pilots need to _know_ | certain information so that it can be employed on a whim to | help solve time-critical problems. The written exam (which | precedes a practical exam) definitely requires memorization. | jvanderbot wrote: | Right. there are plenty of exams _in tech_ that require plain | old practice and on-the-spot ingenuity. However, for | _medical_ and other fields, memorization and recall is key, | so it 's rife for this kind of cheating. | | But honestly, if someone were to tattoo the same information | onto their arm, there's an argument to be made it was | permanently accessible just as much as memory. | asdff wrote: | I mean it is kind of stupid even for medical. You are never | in the middle of the desert having the memorize the | mechanical properties of the inner ear. Every doctor there | is has reference books in reality. Why not let people just | bring those books to their exams if that's how the job | actually works in reality? Learning how to consult a | reference for information is just another mental offshoring | tool like a calculator, so its a little silly when exams | force you to work without it. | BitwiseFool wrote: | To an extent, yes. As a programmer who can't remember the | syntax for declaring a two dimensional array and populating | it with hard-coded strings, I feel somewhat hypocritical when | I say that Medicine seems to be valid domain for rote | memorization. | nkrisc wrote: | When was the last time someone's life depended on you | recalling the syntax for a two dimensional array within the | next few seconds? | | I think it's OK to hold medical professionals to a higher | standard. | asdff wrote: | How often do doctors even need to do this? Everything | they do probably has a standard operating procedure | printed out in a binder that can be dictated by a nurse. | The training should be in learning how to take those | instructions and turn it into action, not that as well as | having to memorize all the instructions that are going to | be referenceable anyhow. | | Maybe if the training were more like the former than the | latter, fewer med students and residents would be pulling | all nighters on some amphetamine. Personally, going into | an ER I'd rather be met with well slept, focused hands | that consult the relevant information, rather than a | sleep deprived zombie barking out protocol they | hypnotized themselves into remembering. | Fogest wrote: | Some courses seem to put far too much emphasis on the | memorization aspect of the courses, which has always seemed | silly to me. For so many jobs you are not required to memorize | a ton of information and instead can refer to manuals, | textbooks, the internet, etc... for those kinds of things. | These are also typically the things people forget shortly after | the exam, which begs the question of how useful it even is in | the first place. For example, I tried out an "Intro to | sociology" class. It was a horrible class, and over half the | exams questions were things like "Which person came up with xyz | theory". Or "What year was xyz theory proposed". So many | questions were purely memorization and did little to actually | test your understanding of those theories. | | What I remember out of most courses is not the things I had to | memorize, but instead it is the practical components. Those | should be the takeaways and things that get tested. Many people | also just sucked at memorizing things like that, and I can | totally see why cheating is such a problem on these kinds of | tests. | | Some of the bests tests I've taken where I've remembered the | most material have been open book tests that allowed me to use | all my textbooks and notes that I had taken. They were hard | tests which really tested the understanding of the course | material. | eitally wrote: | I think there needs to be acknowledgement that there are two | different learning tracks in higher education - one that is | facts & figures, and one that is experiential. For better or | worse, most institutions treat success in facts & figures as | a high quality proxy indicating future success in the | experiential areas, which includes everything from how an | individual knows how to learn & how to teach themselves, to | how they effectively build relationships and collaborate with | others. Speaking as someone both liberal arts & technical | degrees, and technical & business leadership experience over | 20 years in manufacturing & big tech, my assessment is that | this is ridiculous. Of course there will always be a need for | "human computers" -- people who specialize in functions | requiring programmatic, fact-based work -- but _most_ jobs | are not like this, and most individuals who prefer this type | of work would generally benefit from expanding their comfort | and capacity in human-centric skills. | | To this end, I agree vigorously that the current state of | higher education is both unsustainable and insane, but I | think the end game will be more private enterprise & public | sector employers deciding to expand intern & apprenticeship | programs as an alternative to being constrained in hiring to | the pipeline of candidates emerging from top universities. | We'll see. | zozbot234 wrote: | Memorization of "raw" facts has become quite easy with | spaced-repetition tools like Anki. The best performance on | the job always comes from putting together raw memory and | deep conceptual understanding. Neither of these is useful | without the other. | andrewzah wrote: | Intro classes (i.e. 101 or just 100-level classes) are | designed to weed out people or fill cross-class requirements | for majors. My degree required some "aesthetic" classes so I | took Dance 101; the class was comprised of a diversity of | majors + athletes looking for an easy course. It's also a | -lot- of work to grade 150-200 students' tests, and they | might change their major anyways. | | Nearly every course I took at a 300/400+ level was about | demonstrating a fundamental understanding instead of strict | memorization. Open-book tests were more common. And it went | down from 150+ students to 20 or 4. Considering my degree is | a b.a. in media arts, some senior courses had minimal or no | testing at all and instead had large projects. | | That said, perhaps one of the hardest classes I took was a | 300 or 400 level one on Tarantino films, probably to weed out | people who were just looking for an easy class. On top of | demonstrating understanding through analysis via | storyboarding or papers, the quizzes/tests had multiple | choice of 5 answers, which always included "all of the above" | or "none of the above", and short/long answers/prompts. You | really had to have studied each lecture and actually have | watched the relevant films. You wouldn't believe how many | people didn't watch the films... in a film analysis class. | But all of that aside, it was thoroughly interesting and | memorable. | simion314 wrote: | Students cheated with phones and hidden small speakers at | exams that are not about reproducing stuff from memory, the | student would tell the friend on the other side the question | and somehow the friend would find or know the correct answer. | criddell wrote: | It's also worth thinking about why we use tests and what they | actually measure. | | Malcolm Gladwell (yes, I know) did a podcast[1] on the LSAT | that's pretty good. In that podcast, he makes a pretty | compelling argument that what the test measures isn't very | useful. | | [1]: https://www.pushkin.fm/episode/the-tortoise-and-the-hare/ | jcranberry wrote: | The LSAT is probably one of the few tests where what it | measures is directly useful to a prospective lawyer. I find | it hard to believe that he can show that reading | comprehension, logical ability and analytical ability aren't | useful to law school admissions. | firebird wrote: | How did I know this man was Indian or was in India? Lol. | firebird wrote: | fyi I am too. | geodel wrote: | It's simple. Medical students from India like bluetooth | implants. | srvmshr wrote: | In my undergrad days, my sibling's medical college (KMC | Mangalore) had an interesting case where the student had hired | the service of a rice-engraving artist to etch complete medical | manuals onto the sides of metallic ballpoint pens. He was wearing | a high powered lens as bifocals. | | He was caught because he was noticed shuffling a wad of pens too | often & then the bifocal glasses were peculiar, prompting some | investigation. | | He had paid the grain-engraving artist to the tune of | $30,000-35,000 for the whole set (2006). It is a lot of money! | lnxg33k1 wrote: | Wow, when I was young my father sold bijoux and he also used to | create necklaces and bracelet on the fly with names of people | written on grain of rice, he used to sell those for like 5.000 | liras (in Italy, in the 90s, before euros, it would be 2.50 | euros right now), if I knew I would have told him to start | offering his services to cheating students, instead of tourists | in Positano :D | InCityDreams wrote: | You missed the bit where L5.000 became EUR5. | lnxg33k1 wrote: | Oh yeah I didn't miss it, but I guess "technically" it is | 2.50 euros, but yeah practically I would even argue it's | 10euros :D | | edit: but still far from 35000 dollars :D | exikyut wrote: | The massive irony is that the rice-engraving artist may well | have then stood the chance to get a decent head start in | medicine. I've long theorized that copying/transcribing | information can be a great way to meditate in a way conducive | to retaining and learning new data. | | Depends on their skill level, and how much focus there was on | the process of engraving vs temporarily memorizing the next | block of info to transcribe. | agumonkey wrote: | I never went to med school, but in HS I had my beloved modded | HP48 that could store loads of text. I didn't manage to wire | it to my computer so I resorted to type everything manually. | | After a whole day of char-by-char input.. I knew everything | by heart and didn't need to look it up in the calculator. | GekkePrutser wrote: | It also had infrared so you could even use chat apps. It | was attenuated for short range precisely for this reason | but obviously that protection was useless in the hands of | electronics students. | | I still have my 48GX. Though I never used it at an exam. As | computer science student I simply never had any exams that | required a calculator. I just had it for personal | interests. | Joeri wrote: | I only ever used that infrared to control the classroom | vcr, to the absolute befuddlement of the teacher. Only | time I've seen someone tap the side of a vcr to fix | whatever is broken with it. | | I used the serial cable to hook it up to my computer and | loaded it with minigames, to play during class. | | You can tell I was not the best of students. | no1lives4ever wrote: | Reminds me of my attempts to make cheat sheets that I would | use during exams. I would write out a small cheat sheet the | night before I never needed to use those cheat sheets as I | would always remember whatever I had written on them. After | a few cases when I remembered the whole contents of those | sheets, I would just use them as last minute revision aid | and discard them before getting into the examination hall. | agumonkey wrote: | Good old the last minute L1 cache warm up. | yonaguska wrote: | I had some professors in high school that would encourage | us to write a cheat sheet, with the caveat that you had | to fit everything into a standard note card. | | Unfortunately, there was a foreign student that was so | ahead of everyone, that he simply increased the | difficulty of the tests and would curve them, excluding | that one student from the curve. It was normal for most | of the class to get 60s-70s, while this student would get | 90s on his exams. I say unfortunately, but only jokingly. | munk-a wrote: | One of my high school teachers used an accumulating curve | just for this reason - a number of pre-written tests were | rotated out pretty randomly and your grade was scaled in | relation to everyone who had ever taken the test. It did | fail to account for anomalies like the teacher discussing | a subject particularly poorly one year but it was pretty | fair feeling. | chx wrote: | At university one of the exams allowed a single sheet of | handwritten paper to be brought in. People got real damn | creative in squeezing as much information they could on it, | completely oblivious to the fact they actually learned the | subject matter while preparing their "cheat sheet". | CodesInChaos wrote: | That does not match my experience. The primary benefit of | these papers is that you can look up the difficult to | remember stuff during the exam (mostly formulas and precise | definitions in my case). | glfharris wrote: | How is that any different from the rote memorisation that's | been the mainstay of most education systems up to the 21st | century? | | It doesn't really aid understanding, doesn't incorporate | active recall, and tends to become inefficient for a large | corpus of knowledge. | ASalazarMX wrote: | "Doc, I have this small lump in my back that doesn't hurt, | but hurts if I poke it." | | "Oh, I remember I saw something like that in school, let me | Google it!" | | Medicine, like law, involves a lot of memorization. | GekkePrutser wrote: | Bad example though. I'm sure MDs actually look a lot of | stuff up because they can't remember every fringe thing | during their entire career :) | | Also it's an ever changing field of course. | jamesakirk wrote: | Counterexample: It is impossible to understand a new | language without memorization. Memorization is critical, | but it is not sufficient. | mlyle wrote: | Rote isn't a huge part in the school I'm a part of. | | We deliberately have some, though. There's some stuff | that's just helpful to memorize to be able to do more | active work and understanding with (multiplication tables, | basic chemical formulas, sets of trig identities). There's | also some stuff inserted (poem memorization, latin & greek | roots for one grade, all 50 states for another, etc) just | to strengthen the skill of learning by rote for when it's | useful later. | datavirtue wrote: | I have to learn maths by engraving the algorithms in source | code. | cortesoft wrote: | The bigger question is why are we testing for things that can | be looked up that quickly on a tiny grain of rice that probably | doesn't have a good indexing system? | | Like, if there was a question that was easy to answer if you | could look at a reference sheet, then why is it important to | memorize it? If the test take could understand the question | enough to know where to look it up, isn't that good enough? | hokumguru wrote: | Because in the medical field peoples' lives are literally at | stake. Doctors absolutely do research for their patients in | the real world but a base level of knowledge is still | absolutely required. If someone is not able to answer the | "easy" questions then how do we know that they won't falter | when faced with an actual challenging one. | | Would you hire an engineer who couldn't write a FizzBuzz | without looking it up? | Rygian wrote: | How comfortable would you be if your ER doctor went to look | something up while you were in need of urgent care? | throwaway48375 wrote: | They look stuff up all the time. There are dedicated apps | for it e.g. epocraties. | adhesive_wombat wrote: | Brb learning rice engraving. Or maybe I'll just buy a laser | engraver. | caycep wrote: | I think he may be a lousy doctor, but perhaps IT/engineering is | his true calling.... | karaterobot wrote: | The article did not explain how the device was used for cheating. | I'm ready to assume that was his intent, but in what matter would | it have been employed? Was he receiving answers from a third | party? That seems easy to spot: just look for the guy who is | reading the questions out loud. | | Probably they should just have people go through a metal detector | before the test, to identify all these hidden devices. | boomboomsubban wrote: | >Probably they should just have people go through a metal | detector before the test, to identify all these hidden devices. | | How would a metal detector stop it? If you say the metal | detector is picking up a piece of shrapnel from an accident | while young, how can they really disprove that? | hutzlibu wrote: | "If you say the metal detector is picking up a piece of | shrapnel from an accident while young, how can they really | disprove that?" | | X-Rays? MRI? Or requesting medical documents about it? (can | all be done afterwards) | boomboomsubban wrote: | Sure it's possible, but that's asking a lot just to take a | test. | karaterobot wrote: | The same way metal detectors work in other places, like | airports: if you set off the detector for a valid medical | reason, you should be prepared to show the card your doctor | gave you attesting to this fact. | krisoft wrote: | Because people who get a doctor to implant something in | their ear will have so much trouble getting such a card? | karaterobot wrote: | Implanted bluetooth devices is an edge case; so much so | that it made the news. The normal case is people hiding | devices in their clothes. | | Anyway, I'm not sure whether it's considered unethical to | help a patient electively implant a bluetooth receiver in | their bodies, but falsely signing a medical release card | probably is. | nnm wrote: | A way to avoid this is to make it possible to fail. I mean, when | one fails medical exam, not too much pressure / shame on the | student -- they can simply do other type of work. | Firmwarrior wrote: | Man, that's an interesting point | | If you fail the Google entrance exam, you can retake it and/or | work at any of a dozen of other great careers | Slow_Hand wrote: | If we are to assume that bluetooth implants and other embedded | tech that can prompt a user near-instantly with information are | an eventuality, I think there is an interesting question to | consider: | | If everyday people have near-instant access to information, how | will we continue to assess expertise moving forward? Surely it's | not enough to just have access to rote information, like in the | case of the cheating test-taker. We will also expect our experts | to have the deep understanding that comes from experience in a | domain. | | Will we need different language to describe flavors of knowledge | and expertise? If so, will the nature of test-taking and | assessment need to evolve to identify people who actually have an | understanding of the thing being tested, instead of testing for | rote answers? | rocqua wrote: | Rote regurgitation is only useful for teaching the basics, not | advanced stuff. I propose testing this, asking students not to | cheat, and catching cheaters later, in case they screwed | themselves by skipping the basics. | | Why do math students need to know the sine doubling rule? Not | so they can calculate with it (they could look that up) but so | they can reduce certain expressions to sin(2x). That's why | calculus teaches this stuff. | softwarebeware wrote: | In my experience you can easily tell the difference between | someone who knows what they're talking about and someone who | just googles what they're talking about. I have a feeling that | won't change even when people have implants. | throwaway0a5e wrote: | >If everyday people have near-instant access to information, | how will we continue to assess expertise moving forward? Surely | it's not enough to just have access to rote information, like | in the case of the cheating test-taker. We will also expect our | experts to have the deep understanding that comes from | experience in a domain. | | We've always expected professionals to have an understanding. | We've just been using memorization as a proxy for this. | | Any 14yo with a cell phone can go on Reddit give you caned | advise about investments or why your car is making a funny | noise. But we don't trust teenagers googling stuff with those | sorts of things in the real world because there's a huge | difference between being able to pattern match information and | actually understanding what's going on hence why we don't get | advice we care about from anonymous people with backgrounds | that can't be vetted | | Professional education has a filter in front of it so it's | going to be behind the curve when it comes to reckoning with | the realities of information access in the modern age but it'll | have to figure something better than tests out eventually. | wiz21c wrote: | Access to knowledge is one thing, having understanding is | another. I guess we'll just move to problem solving exams | rather than knowledge exams... | WhyNotHugo wrote: | The way exams work is already terribly outdated for many areas | of expertise. Which is why companies no longer take a single | written exam when interviewing professionals, but face-to-face | interviews discussing topics. Academia has yet to catch up in | many domains. | closetohome wrote: | Every college class I had that taught something worth knowing | ended with a test that allowed access to any notes you wanted, | as the point was to demonstrate that you had internalized | concepts, not just memorized facts. | joshmarlow wrote: | > how will we continue to assess expertise moving forward? | | This reminds me of something that I read once - allegedly | Aristotle was actually against books; he believed that having | ready access to books made it easy to 'fake' the type of | education that requires mentorship. | | I think Aristotle's perspective doesn't really make sense today | because (for better or worse) we emphasize the economic utility | of education - is the person actually able to do the job that | they claim to be able to? We don't consider the internal | changes to the person caused by their education (alas...). | | > We will also expect our experts to have the deep | understanding that comes from experience in a domain. | | I think Chalmer's concept of the extended mind is an | interesting framing here - basically it's the notion that your | mind doesn't end right at your skull. For the sake of argument, | let's assume in the future that we'll have BCI that's good | enough to let you text with you mind (something like what | Neuralink is going for). If you've got an expert system in your | head/pocket that's really good at dealing with some domain and | you're really good at _phrasing problems in terms that the | expert system can understand_ then you + expert system might | have a super-human ability to solve problems in that domain. | | If I was hiring for that domain, I wouldn't particularly mind | how much of your expertise is in biological tissue. | jcranmer wrote: | > This reminds me of something that I read once - allegedly | Aristotle was actually against books; he believed that having | ready access to books made it easy to 'fake' the type of | education that requires mentorship. | | I think that was Socrates, not Aristotle. Socrates was very | firmly against the concept of writing, and we know all about | this only because his student was writing down what the | teacher was telling him. | whoomp12342 wrote: | Keep making people memorize things! | ricardobeat wrote: | Isn't this already the case? At least in my experience | interviewing for software development, all the questions are | meant to test understanding and the ability to explore and | solve problems, never static knowledge. | moosey wrote: | We already have the language to describe someone who claims an | expertise in a knowledge area without the study necessary to be | an actual expert: dilettante. | | And that's all that we'll actually be without memorization. | There is a huge gap between someone with knowledge and | expertise ingrained in their head, with a solid knowledge of | the gaps in their knowledge, or understanding the layout of a | knowledge realm that can only come from dedicated study of a | subject, vs a dabbler or whatever level of expertise another | individual might have with less stringent studies. | | This same problem exists in our education system and cramming. | You can cram subjects and pass tests, but research had shown | that the knowledge gain from this process to be extremely | limited. | | Without a well ingrained knowledge of a subject, it is | difficult to use that knowledge in creative thought, connecting | with other realms of knowledge. | | If all of these human mental processes are replaced with | computation, and people no longer put in the effort to learn | challenging things, then I predict large amounts of mental | decline. We may already be seeing this process. Perhaps I | should say... "As we offload more mental processing to | computers...", Because it's definitely a process that many | people are going through. | | That isn't too say that computerized information is all bad. My | wife would probably leave me if I didn't have a calendar app. | balls187 wrote: | Reminds me of programming in physics formulas in a Ti-83. | | Turns out, the act of programming the formula made it easy for me | to recall it without cheating. | doctor_eval wrote: | I'm always amazed at the amount of trouble people will go to in | order to build their lives on a foundation of lies. I know there | are many reasons and pressures, but what a way to start your | career. If you're successful, you're almost guaranteeing a life | of stress - and that's assuming you don't kill anyone. | mmmmkay wrote: | at that point, just give them the A ;) | megous wrote: | I don't care about the ear guy, but how are people scaling the | building not being noticed? Wtf? :D So bizarre. | JoeAltmaier wrote: | When does it become 'biological enhancement'? Maybe all doctors | should have a bluetooth implanted, to connect them to an AI or | online consultants at all times? | airstrike wrote: | *STARGATE SG-1 SPOILERS* | | The first episode of Stargate I ever watched sorta touched on | this... It's the season 7, episode 5 called "Revisions" with | Christopher Heyerdahl. Definitely recommend. It got me hooked | on the franchise forever | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revisions_(Stargate_SG-1) | snek_case wrote: | Looked this episode up on YouTube. Some quality TV right | here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_0O8zB5M_I&t=70s | zionic wrote: | The whole series is amazing. I strongly recommend watching | SG1 S1-S7, then stargate atlantis S1 in parallel with SG1 | S8. Some of the best television ever made. | | https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/sci-fi/how-to-watch- | stargate-i... | adfgadfgaery wrote: | An ordinary earpiece is better for all legitimate purposes. | snek_case wrote: | I'm curious what this "micro bluetooth" device looks like. | abeppu wrote: | It's bad enough when hospitals get hacked. I can't imagine the | problems that happen when the medical staff's 'biological | enhancements' are hacked. | | In this community we sometimes talk about how some technical | interviews are deeply unrealistic because they remove the | candidate from, e.g. their IDE with tab autocompletion, or | googling, which you might normally depend on. Your skills are | best measured when you have access to the tools and environment | which you'd actually use while working. And yet ... sometimes | you can pair program with someone and it's clear that they | don't really understand what they're accepting from the | autocomplete, and this is legitimate cause for concern. | | I think I want doctors to definitely know a bunch of stuff | unaided, even if they would normally always have access to | supplementary references. If nothing else, they should have the | habits of mind to be able to critically evaluate their | references, and notice when they're wrong or suspect. | samstave wrote: | Exactly ; | | A favorite joke: | | _" One shouldn't do [that medical procedure], as GOD made you | perfect and you shouldn't mess with God's! plan!!!"_ | | > Thats an interesting comment, may I ask - was God's plan to | manufacture those glasses such that you can see clearly and | read such from that book, made by man? | jotm wrote: | I used that argument for Jehova's witnesses and religious | whatchacallthem on the streets... it's pointless | mattigames wrote: | You tried to explain a logical fallacy to someone who | believes in invisible beings and it didn't work? Shocking | /s | yakubin wrote: | Nit: practically everyone believes in invisible things, | e.g. electrons, or black holes. :) | colinmhayes wrote: | In a similar vein... | | A fellow was stuck on his rooftop in a flood. He was praying | to God for help. | | Soon a man in a rowboat came by and the fellow shouted to the | man on the roof, "Jump in, I can save you." | | The stranded fellow shouted back, "No, it's OK, I'm praying | to God and he is going to save me." | | So the rowboat went on. | | Then a motorboat came by. "The fellow in the motorboat | shouted, "Jump in, I can save you." | | To this the stranded man said, "No thanks, I'm praying to God | and he is going to save me. I have faith." | | So the motorboat went on. | | Then a helicopter came by and the pilot shouted down, "Grab | this rope and I will lift you to safety." | | To this the stranded man again replied, "No thanks, I'm | praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith." | | So the helicopter reluctantly flew away. | | Soon the water rose above the rooftop and the man drowned. He | went to Heaven. He finally got his chance to discuss this | whole situation with God, at which point he exclaimed, "I had | faith in you but you didn't save me, you let me drown. I | don't understand why!" | | To this God replied, "I sent you a rowboat and a motorboat | and a helicopter, what more did you expect?" | | I know a few doctors who have told me they've used this one | on people who refuse care for religious reasons. | Unfortunately they said it rarely works. | avgDev wrote: | I would give so much to see doctors who simply "google" things. | | As someone who works as dev improving data and efficiency in a | business.....i hate people who don't just google things. I | implemented something a year ago, maybe its time to refresh my | knowledge and see if anything has changed? Some doctors are | infuriating, using knowledge they gained 10 years ago. Medicine | also changes fairly quickly and quick search could really be a | great tool. | | Imagine this, I have seen many physicians (40+) at top | hospitals about "mysterious" symptoms due to a reaction to a | medication. 3 agreed its possible. The symptoms are listed on | the medication label, plus I have been tested for everything | else under the sun. I have sent research to my primary | physician who has said, I am the first patient to change his | mind about a drug. A quick search just listing my vague | symptoms would bring up a possible reaction, or just looking at | the damn label. | jnovek wrote: | I can't agree with this enough. | | I deal with daily chronic pain which has rendered me | essentially unable to work. My full-time job has been | "patient" for almost three years. | | What I've learned is that you have to do their work for them | if you want to make progress. | | Sometimes that means showing up with highlighted printouts of | studies that they would never get around to reading if you | didn't deliver them -- and follow up on them -- personally. | | Other times that means that means playing dumb and | "presenting" (not faking, just highlighting) the right | preliminary symptoms to get a key test ordered. | | I'm lucky in that I have education. I can read a study. I | understand probability and statistics. I can learn | terminology and use it (somewhat) correctly in a sentence. I | often wonder how people without a STEM background get any | care at all. Perhaps they don't? | | It's a horrible, broken system that amounts to little more | than insurance-mandated gatekeeping. | eitally wrote: | My wife is a nurse who pivoted into pharma, and when our | daughter was diagnosed with a heart tumor, the only thing | that ultimately resulted in us finding the right case was | my wife's experience and ability to 1) ask the right | questions, and 2) conduct her own scientific literature | search & meta analyses. I kept thinking throughout that, if | we weren't able to do this, our daughter would probably die | ... and how many millions of patients receive subpar care | because they don't have the skills or knowledge to keep | care providers (and insurers) honest. | WalterBright wrote: | There's a lot of medical misinformation online, too. | avgDev wrote: | Someone with an extensive education should be able to | decide which information can be considered good. If not, | then maybe we should stop testing memorization and focus on | ability to solve problems using ALL tools available. | TheCraiggers wrote: | Presumably, doctors would have access to better information | than the layperson, and know how to sift through it. I know | the person you replied to said "Google", but that's been a | fairly overloaded term for decades now. | | Personally, I would like to see a doctor searching a site | made for doctors. Seeing one just do an actual generic | online search would not give me much confidence. | eitally wrote: | One eye opening fact I learned when my family was dealing | with a complex medical diagnosis was how specialists have | seemingly the entire population of peers on speed dial. | If you can help them connect dots to other specialists, | they likely have the ability to get in touch with them in | near real time. I mean, it may not be 100% reliable, but | my new MO is to assume all physicians have a batphone, | and to ask them to use it if they need additional | opinions & insights. | cruano wrote: | I mean, it's not like they are going to ask wikihow. | | Updated versions of their books and medical journals, or | even a stackoverflow-like platform where they could discuss | and read answers would be magnitudes better. | | Maybe humans memorizing tons of information was the best | approach for medicine a century ago, but it's not the case | anymore | Nextgrid wrote: | Which is why having an expert sift through it is helpful - | he can immediately rule out garbage from stuff that at | least looks sane and might warrant further consideration. | | As engineers we do it all the time (sometimes | subconsciously) when searching for technical documentation. | Having that skill in other fields would be a godsend, but | the next best thing would be to have someone else do it on | our behalf. | gbear605 wrote: | There are medical databases specifically for things like | this (not available to the general public), but doctors | often don't reference them because of false confidence or | time pressure. | Zenbit_UX wrote: | If been in a clinic where after describing my symptoms the | doctor opened the computer and typed them into a search | engine. I asked her if she was googling it and she said "sort | of". She started telling me about a search tool doctor's use | which is much more professionally focused than Google (who | diagnoses everyone with cancer) and I was very impressed both | with her honesty and that this existed. | | It's been a few years since so I don't remember if it was a | windows app or a website but it did have a very 90s looking | interface. | Karunamon wrote: | My primary did this. There's a site called UpToDate which | Epic apparently has a one click integration with. | | It's basically medical Google. | psyc wrote: | I had exactly this happen once in a regular MD's office, | but he was reading to me from literally the Wikipedia | article on carpal tunnel, on a Chromebook. Actually | Wikipedia. | yupper32 wrote: | I've had similar experiences like that; the doctor | pulling up articles from common websites. But it wasn't | the doctor pulling up the article because they didn't | know what was in the article, it was them showing me so I | can look it up later and read more if I wanted. | | Wikipedia seems like a poor choice, though. Maybe carpel | tunnel is basic enough for Wikipedia to be fine. I've | been shown stuff like Mayo Clinic articles. | otikik wrote: | I caught a gastrointestinal parasite in one journey to Brazil | (I should have avoided the street food!) and I am 90% sure | that my Spanish doctor just googled what the hell I had when | she got the results of the analysis, right there in front of | me. I am not 100% sure because I could not see her screen, | but the (in)frequency of mouse clicks was consistent with | someone going over google and reading a bunch of pages. And | then suddenly she started typing a lot and didn't use the | mouse at all - switched to her daily medical app, I presumed. | | The antibiotics she gave me did the trick. She was young, | though. | oceanplexian wrote: | I used to work in this industry. Medicine is the most broken, | indoctrinated, risk-averse, technology-averse industry of them | all. These are people who still use fax machines. Ask your | doctor for some basic imaging or so much as a print out of your | chart and they'll deny your problem, then give you confused | dirty looks and talk down to you. | | Compare that with Dentistry. I had a problem and walked in with | an hour's notice, had a x-ray from a handheld scanner emailed | to me with the problem highlighted within 5 minutes like | something out of Star Trek. | owenversteeg wrote: | I agree, for some reason dentistry and orthodontics seem far | more technologically advanced than the rest of medicine. In | addition to handheld x-rays like you mentioned, I've seen | dentists/orthodontists use 3D printers, 3D scanners (e.x. | iTero Element) and modern composites. Small sample size, but | all the orthodontists and dentists' offices I've been in are | clearly embracing new technology as much as they can, while | every doctor's office I've been in has seemed like it could | be a hundred years old. I wonder why that is. | elliekelly wrote: | The cynic in me suspects it's because insurance companies | and employer-provided insurance hasn't completely mucked up | the market the way it has with healthcare. Sometimes I | wonder if America's "best" (least resistant) path to | single-payer healthcare is to start smaller scale with | universal coverage for vision & dentistry and then slowly | expand coverage from there. | withinboredom wrote: | That's not exactly the industries fault though. For example, | in the US, you have to get a mammogram BY LAW. It doesn't | even matter that there are better and more reliable methods | to detect breast cancer, the law said it MUST be a mammogram. | https://www.factcheck.org/2013/10/aca-doesnt-restrict- | mammog.... | | Anyway, then you have companies like Theranos who come along | and prove why it's a good idea to be risk adverse. Snake oil | has been sold for a long time, and it really isn't until | "recently" that it has been illegal to sell it (since a bit | after 1906, in the US). | 2muchcoffeeman wrote: | Is this an American thing? | | In Australia all imaging is stored on the cloud somewhere. | For a reason unknown to me, you still get the huge envelope. | But inside is just a piece of paper with some public id and a | QRcode. You don't really need these. The doctor who ordered | the imaging will automatically get forwarded the results. If | you are refereed to a specialist, they will get it to. | verisimi wrote: | Bring on the neural lace! | whoomp12342 wrote: | yeah let me just lance myself right before a test and no one is | going to notice my giant fucking stitch | humansuit wrote: | Assuming the student implanted the device in their own ear, they | did learn enough to be dangerous. They'll show up as a | transhumanist influencer at best and a back alley surgeon at | worst. | after_care wrote: | Is there any literature about implanting such a device? | zeepzeep wrote: | Similar, this is about magnets in ears. | https://forum.dangerousthings.com/t/tragus-implants-and-you-... | https://forum.biohack.me/index.php?p=/discussion/2642/tragus... | Both forums are the right place to find that info, though | biohack.me is kinda dead. | oblio wrote: | Asking for a friend? | after_care wrote: | I'm curious because the last time I surveyed the literature | of diy implantable devices there didn't seem to be anything | on a power source strong enough for a bluetooth device to | operate for hours at a time. | zeepzeep wrote: | There are, lithium batteries. The problem is, they outgas | and explode. People do not want to implant these batteries, | even with a low failrate and detectors. | | There were things, e.g. the NorthStar implant, which became | EmbediVet. But for aforementioned safety issues, it wasn't | even used for cows. | | Passive tech is the only thing right now (RFID, NFC) | wildmanx wrote: | Just for completeness since I didn't find a comment yet | mentioning it: Time to turn exam halls into Faraday cages. | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote: | Hmm... about 10 years ago I helped a friend pass an oral exam by | talking to him over the phone. He had this "headset" that came in | two parts: a tiny magnet that you insert into your ear canal, and | a necklace that your put under your shirt, which was basically a | large coil that vibrated the magnet in your ear. | samstave wrote: | My apologies for said joke: | | > _I need you to help me pass an oral exam_ | | >> _Whats the subject?_ | | >>> _Biology_ | | >>>> _uh... whats your gag relfex like?*_ | 0des wrote: | > 2009 | | What's up with all the legacy accounts acting up lately? | samstave wrote: | More experiential than you may have had? | 4a3f35b5a wrote: | Would love to know more details about this! | | - How did the "necklace" connect to a phone? (Since you were | talking over the phone) | | - Was it bidirectional communication? How did friend | communicate with you? | tylergetsay wrote: | These are pretty easy to find online: | https://www.ebay.com/itm/254882338954 | | Id rather fail an exam than put a tiny magnet into my ear in | the hopes to get it back out... | MengerSponge wrote: | Sounds like a re-tasked hearing aid | eunos wrote: | This remind me of how strict Chinese national exams are (Gaokao). | They even have signal jammers to prevent external communication. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-14 23:00 UTC)