[HN Gopher] Strava abruptly ends 3rd party data sync to Apple He... ___________________________________________________________________ Strava abruptly ends 3rd party data sync to Apple Health Author : andyzei Score : 36 points Date : 2022-03-14 19:56 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.dcrainmaker.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.dcrainmaker.com) | exabrial wrote: | All of the (Garmin, Strava, Apple, and Google [who is trying | really hard but failing]) want a monopoly on your health data. | Garmin is the only one I actually trust currently, as they've | shown 0 willingness to monetize your health information. | | The Strava/Garmin relationship is an interesting one: Strava has | the social network, Garmin has the best devices [for serious | Athletes, not casual users]. Garmin Connect is pretty cool in | it's own right, but the Social features never really took off, | which is where Strava plays and has a de-fact monopoly. Strava | can't survive without Garmin, and Garmin benefits from Strava's | content. | | Garmin has pulled some 'power moves' in the past though with | people it doesn't like... A competitor: Wahoo, who made cycling | GPS computers, was cut off from inserting data into Garmin | Connect and it left a lot of users out in the cold. Most serious | cyclists will use Garmin devices, not an Apple watch, to track | their rides as it seamlessly integrates with ANT+ sensors: power, | cadence, wheel speed, heart rate, chainring and cog positions | sensors. | | Interesting to see Strava cut off Apple... I'm guessing it has to | do something with preventing them from developing an alternative | to the Strava social network. | oneplane wrote: | Strava isn't cut off from Apple. Instead, Garmin/Fitbit etc. | would send their data to Strava, which then would forward it to | Apple for them. The part where Strava takes the data from non- | Strava apps is the one that got disabled (presumably by strava | and not by garmin, but either could have). | usrusr wrote: | Really surprising to see Strava actively avoiding the central | switchboard role that would be such a powerful retention | feature. I wouldn't be surprised to see it come back very | soon, with some low level UX polisher receiving that talk | about power and responsibility. | sulam wrote: | Garmin couldn't directly disable this, once Strava has your | data they can do with it whatever they want, licensing | permitting. Which is a segue into - while I have no specific | knowledge of this case, I do think it's somewhat tricky to | take data from a third party and then hand it on to another | third party. Presumably all of this was mediated by the user, | and user's desires should be paramount here, but it's an | example of why I believe OAuth is fairly broken and what we | should all be giving permission to is capabilities, not | access. | verisimi wrote: | I'm still shocked and amazed that anyone would willingly share | their health data with corporations. Why? What could go right? | I say that acknowledging your point that this is possibly one | of the better corporations out there. | | > Garmin is the only one I actually trust currently, as they've | shown 0 willingness to monetize your health information. | | What about the concern that the company is bought out in the | future? Or that it may be sharing data already, with government | agencies, etc? Or companies that it works with? | | I honestly can't even imagine the criteria whereby a | corporation could be 'trusted' with personal information! | | It boggles my mind, that people think about this - and plainly | you do - but come to the judgement that its ok for corporations | to have this personal data! | mulmen wrote: | I prefer the corporations not have the _data_ at all. The | problem is Apple is simultaneously the best and also pretty | bad at stewarding such an ecosystem. In theory all my actual | health data would live on a device I own, encrypted, and | accessible only by the apps I approve. In reality Apple can | 't or won't provide those mechanisms. Every other corporation | wants to collect and sell my data. | | Apple had a chance to make on-premise data storage a thing. | They had AirPort, which combined with a Mac Mini could | provide full iCloud functionality from the home. iCloud | itself could have simply been an encrypted offsite backup, | like Tarsnap with no options. | | Instead Apple built a system that still puts clear user data | within their reach. | js2 wrote: | > Garmin has the best devices [for serious Athletes, not casual | users]. | | I'm a happy Garmin user but I know a lot of distance runners | that have switched to Coros. They love the battery life w/o | sacrificing GPS accuracy. | trentgreene wrote: | I've rearchitected my data flow for cycling multiple times now, | and it's frustrating to do it again | ijustwanttovote wrote: | I kept messing with my settings yesterday to figure out why my | Strava data wasn't exporting to Apple health. Now I know why, I | must've spent an hour trying to get it to work. | samschooler wrote: | Note: this restriction is limited to THIRD PARTY data, so: | | Strava -> Apple Health, still works | | Garmin/Fitbod/3rd party app -> Strava -> Apple Health, no longer | syncs. | | IMHO this is better for me because now I don't have duplicates in | Apple Health and can sync to both services. But to each they're | own I guess. | artdigital wrote: | Wonder if this includes third party sensor data that's tracked | with Strava. Like if I use a chest strap and record into | Strava, will the exported data include the sensor data or is | that considered "third party" | stingrae wrote: | Why not let users chose to enable/disable? | Gigachad wrote: | I think this can make sense. The recording devices ideally | should have their own integrations with Apple Health so the | source pushes to all the data repos rather than repos chaining | the data along. | notacoward wrote: | The weird thing is that they claim it's to avoid duplicate | activities, but they totally know how to recognize duplicates | already. Every so often, there's some sort of glitch in one of my | activities getting from Garmin to Strava. If I'm feeling | impatient, I download the .fit file from Garmin and upload it to | Strava myself, and _I never get a duplicate that way_. Happened | for the first time in a while just last week. Clearly, whenever | Garmin _does_ send the data, Strava is perfectly capable of | recognizing an activity it already has, and it does the right | thing. I 'm just not buying that excuse. | | BTW and a bit OT, I find it very impressive that Strava can | _retroactively_ create a leaderboard going back years for a newly | created segment, meaning that they must evaluate potentially | millions of nearby activities for overlaps, often in just a few | minutes. That 's a hell of a query. Anybody know of more | information on how they do it? | mulmen wrote: | Millions of activities is approximately zero activities. That's | an inconsequential amount of data. | | Even if it is a couple orders of magnitude larger than I think | geographic partitioning can keep the volume small enough to | easily fit in RAM. | mdoms wrote: | Incredibly ignorant statement. An activity can have thousands | of data points across dozens of metrics. A record of your | route to 1 meter or smaller precision for a 5 hour bike ride | is alone thousands of data points. Along with hundreds or | thousands of time series points for heart rate, elevation, | cadence, power, respiration, etc etc... Millions of | activities means tracking tens of billions of data points and | perhaps an order of magnitude more than that. | whimsicalism wrote: | I thought they meant duplicate activities on the Apple Health | side. If they can't read what the other services are writing to | Apple Health then they have no way of avoiding duplicates. | Gigachad wrote: | I wonder what is going on at Strava. It feels like peak Strava | was some time around 2018. Since then, it seems like features | have only been getting disabled, hidden behind opt in flags, or | moved to the paid plans. I completely understand the decision to | move things to paid since their service does cost a lot to run | and the subscription isn't expensive, but where are all the new | and cool features that should have come out over the last few | years? | | And I wonder if the article is correct in that they are pivoting | away from segments. That seems strange since segments seem like | the most compelling feature. | usrusr wrote: | > And I wonder if the article is correct in that they are | pivoting away from segments | | That's not what DCR wrote, that part was clearly about user | perception: Strava has grown into something bigger than just | that app that declares you KOM when you go really fast. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | They're starting to run it like a business. | | Most apps/startups begin as an exploration of product/market | fit. They'll try a lot of different things and use analytics | (even simple server-side stats) to determine what people | actually use in the app. Very frequently, you discover that the | things you thought your users would want are actually only used | by 0.05% of your customers. Eventually you have to start | shedding rarely used features and limiting free plans, even if | it makes the non-paying users angry. | | Truth is, it doesn't really matter if you're losing someone who | spend 5 years on the free plan but refused to sign up for the | paid plan. They're not converting to paid unless they're forced | to, and you're not gaining any money by letting them stay on | the free plan for another 5 years. | | > but where are all the new and cool features that should have | come out over the last few years? | | Cutting rarely-used features like this one could be a sign that | they're trying to free up engineering resources to ship new | features. | site-packages1 wrote: | Paid member for a decade here. They've pulled some things that | I enjoy, like the Instagram sync and nerfed the Flyby map. I've | met so many people that I've chatted with briefly on a ride, | then found them on Flyby after and we added each other. I do | get the privacy concerns of stalkers or whatever, but there are | better ways to handle on the Flyby feature. The nerf of that is | by far the biggest bad thing that has happened, imo. | | I don't blame them for adding things behind paywall. But behind | the paywall they have indeed added features I find compelling, | such as the new 3D maps, which is really cool, new heatmap | functionality, and new functionality around fudging the | start/end of rides randomly so people have a harder time | working out where you live. I think it's still strong. But I am | biased because I love Strava. If they want a CTO I believe I | have the resume and requisite personal life to make them | successful. :) Please hire me before making the decision to | pivot from segments, if that's on the table! /s, but maybe not | pedalpete wrote: | From discussions I've had with people at Strava, they're trying | to be more focused on implementing a few key features really | well. When the original founders returned in 2018 or 2019, the | app had a ton of features that had been half integrated, | couldn't be found in order to be used, etc etc. | | They paired back things that weren't working, moved to focus on | revenue (as they weren't going to be able to grow into the | social network for all activities like they tried). | | I think it's the right strategy, but this move makes no sense. | It's very easy for them to manage duplicate data, and I'm | surprised to see them suggest users set-up their garmin device | to connect directly to Apple. This essentially makes it easier | for strava to be cut out of the loop in the future if the | social aspect isn't working for you. | s1mon wrote: | Strava is extremely frustrating. I've been a paid user for 10+ | years. They do add features from time to time, but it's amazing | how slowly it happens. There's a forum on their web site for | user feedback and suggestions, but it seems like they pay | little attention to the users. So many of their users that I | know feel like a run or bike ride didn't happen if they don't | record it on Strava. It's a super addictive and sticky product, | yet Strava seems to squander this loyalty by ignoring their | customers. | | Route building and personal heatmaps are some of my favorite | features, but there's so much that could be added (like a | simple search). To some degree their customers are spread out | over so many market segments beyond the original biking and | running that they started with. Each segment has their own | needs and wants. Then there's all the hardware (watches, power | meters, trainers, etc..) that needs to be integrated and | supported. | asdff wrote: | I'm an occasional strava user because I wanted just something | to log these data and strava seemed like the popular choice, | but what a clunky app. First off there are so many features | and I have no clue how to use any of them, half of them ask | for a subscription. Feels like my junky cut rate wyzecam app | always asking to upcharge me, or maybe Spirit Airlines. The | auto pause feature rarely works correctly (maybe not at all?) | on my cellphone. I'm sitting there still as a statue and I'm | watching average speed tick down... | | I used it snowboarding and there's some way to track runs and | push out the whole day of skiing as one post, but I couldn't | figure it out, so I just polluted my own feed with these | single run posts. Then for some of them I forget to start | recording halfway down the run because once again thanks to | the broken auto pause feature, so now I need to remember to | start it up at the top of the hill in addition to already | having to put on a snowboard binding. Then thanks to the auto | pause and me forgetting about pausing the run, it records me | shuffling about in the lift line and then riding 25mph on the | nose on the gondola. | outside1234 wrote: | There is no business here that scales sadly. In fact, it gets | more expensive for Strava to operate the longer you are a | subscriber | | And it apparently isn't valuable enough to charge more for | ($5/month) | KindAndFriendly wrote: | >> it gets more expensive for Strava to operate the longer | you are a subscriber | | What are you referring to? That Strava has to store&compute | more and more data from a user the longer they are using the | platform? | whimsicalism wrote: | Sad to see this happen to Apple, a strong crusader for open | standards across competing systems. | CoastalCoder wrote: | Honest question, is that comment meant at face value, or is it | sarcastic? | | My impression of Apple has been that it's a mixed-bag for | privacy, etc., so I'm actually not sure. | whimsicalism wrote: | Sarcastic :) (but hopefully not snarky?) | | For privacy, certainly they have been a crusader. For open | standards, considerably less so. | dc-programmer wrote: | Apple's garden (orchard?) is famously walled. This just means | they intentionally make their hardware incompatible with | other hardware/software. Presumable so you have to buy more | Apple stuff | [deleted] | [deleted] | outside1234 wrote: | amen | mdoms wrote: | Garmin Connect is so much better than Strava it's not even close. | The only reason I could possibly imagine preferring Strava is if | I desperately need my social circle to be aware of my every | workout. For those of us who do this for ourselves and not the | approval of our peers Strava is miles behind. | renewiltord wrote: | Curious HN phenomenon: Describing reasons for behaviour as | different from some hypothetical human with undesirable traits. | | This one: | | 1. I don't use Strava because I am doing things for myself and | not the approval of my peers | | I shall shelve this along with my other HN faves which are | (paraphrased): | | 1. I am remote because unlike everyone who goes to the office I | have a _life_ with _hobbies_ and I don 't like having friends | only from work | | 2. For those of us who own a phone for productive reasons and | not for social "clout", iPhones are terrible | | 3. If you want to do work and not just sit around in coffee | shops posting about work, you would avoid a Macbook | | Very enjoyable. | adam-_- wrote: | Maybe it's just what you know but every time I've used Garmin | Connect it's felt like a dumpster fire compared to Strava. | | Even for route planning (years ago) which I would not say | Strava is fantastic at, it still seemed worse. | | YMMV | notacoward wrote: | That's a very negative view of why people want to share on | Strava. It's not all about ego. Sometimes it's about | motivation, in two ways. I try to track _my own_ times on | various segments to see how well my training is going, and | sometimes challenge myself to beat those times, because that | helps me keep going. Garmin Connect 's equivalent is a | wasteland by comparison, though I do like the color-coded pace | information. Even more importantly, it's a platform where | friends can encourage each other, and celebrate each other's | accomplishments. I greatly appreciate the "kudos" I get from | others, and that was especially true after I had a setback some | years ago. I have a friend right now who had an even more | serious setback, and I'm glad I have a way to support him as he | logs his rehab activities. It's the only forum where we're | connected (he's not very online the way I am) and it enriches | both of our lives. | | I know a lot of people think Strava is just about ego. I submit | that it's often projection or envy from people who don't get | what _they_ want out of it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-14 23:00 UTC)