[HN Gopher] Ur-Fascism By Umberto Eco (1995) [pdf] ___________________________________________________________________ Ur-Fascism By Umberto Eco (1995) [pdf] Author : monort Score : 148 points Date : 2022-03-20 12:44 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.pegc.us) (TXT) w3m dump (www.pegc.us) | jancsika wrote: | > During World War II, the Americans who took part in the Spanish | war were called "premature anti-fascists" - meaning that fighting | against Hitler in the Forties was a moral duty for every good | American, but fighting against Franco too early, in the Thirties, | smelled sour because it was mainly done by Communists and other | leftists. . . | | Just to troll a bit-- if you fought too early on the side of the | lower-case "other leftists" in, say, Barcelona you may have | gotten in a gunfight with a group of communists[1]. Turns out the | world is a complex place. | | Speaking of which (and continuing to troll)-- anyone know why the | lower-case "other leftists" in Barcelona boxed up the | photographic evidence of their existence and sent it to the UK | instead of the USSR for safekeeping[2]? I mean if the forces | against fascism were "Communists, Etcetera" why not send them | there? | | 1: https://medium.com/@umawrnkl/the-anarcho-communist-dream- | of-... | | 2: https://autonomies.org/2019/12/the-lost-images-of- | anarchist-... | adg001 wrote: | > Speaking of which (and continuing to troll)-- anyone know why | the lower-case "other leftists" in Barcelona boxed up the | photographic evidence of their existence and sent it to the UK | instead of the USSR for safekeeping[2]? I mean if the forces | against fascism were "Communists, Etcetera" why not send them | there? | | You are confusing Communism in Western Europe with the | communist state of the USSR and its Stalinist doctrine of | socialism in one country [3]. | | The Belgian Marxist economist Ernest Mandel argues in "From | Stalinism to Eurocommunism: The Bitter Fruits of 'Socialism in | One Country'" that when Soviet Union in 1924 abandoned the goal | of overthrowing capitalism around the world lead to development | of what later was called Eurocommunism [4], with their | democratic way to social reforms. | | [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_one_country | | [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocommunism | ZeroGravitas wrote: | I think you might be too strongly associating 'USSR' and | 'communist'. They're intertwined but not identical. | Smoosh wrote: | The same thing happens with Fascism and the Nazis. | sorokod wrote: | Well, Orwell was one of those "leftist" and did write "Animal | Farm". | | BTW the photos in your second link are fantastic! | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell#Spanish_Civil_Wa... | memonkey wrote: | Isaac Asimov wrote a great critique on 1984 which includes a | few thoughts on Animal Farm: | http://www.newworker.org/ncptrory/1984.htm | michannne wrote: | It seems evident, to me at least, that Asimov views "arms- | length extremism" as a core part of the identity of upper | case Leftism, at least in the West (and predominantly | America). The way Asimov approaches 1984 appears to be the | bog-standard "Well, if you're not a Nazi then you can't | possibly be as evil as the Nazis". It betrays a view of | looking at politics from a standpoint of a slope, rather | than a hill that descends into immorality on both sides, | and I'm sure Asimov derives that view (as does much of the | modern world) from the reasons behind and outcomes of WWII. | IMO, we still haven't gotten past this - even entertaining | such a discussion can't be had without acknowledging the | 'progressive Sword of Damocles' hanging overhead, and | almost always descends into whatabout-whataboutism. | | I really do hope that we eventually grow out of this phase | and acknowledge that even the 'good guys' can be evil, we | shouldn't need to wait and see a Communist Reich to know | that the Leftist version of brownshirts are a bad thing, or | wait until actual genocide is happening (or accept/ignore | it as a possibility, even) or wait until it has a 1-to-1 | mapping with Nazi atrocity to hold those kinds of behavior | accountable just because they're not Nazis and they're not | actually killing people. | vkou wrote: | > I really do hope that we eventually grow out of this | phase and acknowledge that even the 'good guys' can be | evil, we shouldn't need to wait and see a Communist Reich | to know that the Leftist version of brownshirts are a bad | thing, or wait until actual genocide is happening (or | accept/ignore it as a possibility, even) or wait until it | has a 1-to-1 mapping with Nazi atrocity to hold those | kinds of behavior accountable just because they're not | Nazis and they're not actually killing people. | | Having looked at 2020, the threat of the United States | going in this direction is not coming from some unholy | trinity of the ghosts of Stalin, Pol Pot, and Trotsky. As | a political idea in the public zeitgheist, it's dead as a | parrot. It has no legs. | | It's coming from the _mainstream_ right. But since our | friendly neighbourhood MAGA rallies aren 't _actually_ | sieging and heiling, we 're all in the 'wait and see how | bad it can get the next time they take power' stage. | michannne wrote: | I agree, I vividly remember how bad some conversations | used to get, to the point of ignoring or justifying | certain atrocities, and I have seen that the acts of | groups such as the-one-that-shall-not-be-named confined | largely to certain counties in certain states. I don't | know how much of the fervor dying down is attributable to | 2020 having come and gone, but I'm at least a little glad | that most discussions have remained firmly centrist and | any leftover fires are the dying gasps of populist | mainstream media wars. | EMIRELADERO wrote: | I don't really like this critique, mostly because, in my | opinion, it fails to understand that 1984 is a _fictional_ | book. There are some parallelisms with Stalinism and other | tyrannical societies, yes, however they are only there as | part of history in that world. I would say it failed to | recognize that 1984 is more of an essay about human nature, | more specifically into the desire for power above | everything else. I really don 't think Orwell had planned | to make a "reflecting" story, something like "Woah! This | was about Stalinist Russia all along!". | | The critique failed to understand that, I think. | guerrilla wrote: | It sounds like you might be ignorant of the anarchist vs. state | socialist divide which has existed since 1872. [1] At every | opportunity, state socialists have suppressed or outright | killed anarchists, especially in the USSR. [2] | | 1. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Workingmen%27s_A... | | 2. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in_Russia#In_the_Sov... | kkfx wrote: | Fascism, nazism etc were just puppet regimes not much different | than modern MENA-region dictatorships, they use propaganda to | elicit popular consensus, the same propaganda written by Gustave | Le Bon and Eduard Bernays, with means the same propaganda used | today in western countries by neoliberals. | | The puppet master of them was the classic capitalism that deeply | fear a thing: socialism. Those regimes ware created just to stop | socialism, for the sake of big capitals. They might have derailed | a bit grabbing more power but not really as much as we read from | official history: who win? Well, big companies from Germany and | Italy with relative families behind remains almost intact. | Porsche, Krupp, ... as examples still active today. Germany loose | it's status of big power, now reduced to an economical-only | power, Italy loose it's status of II grade European power, now | reduced to a corruptocracy mostly controlled by anglophone | neoliberals and local criminals (I'm Italian, I know well what | happen) but "winners", so called "allies", quickly put back nazis | and fascists in power, in the magistracy, police and armed | forces, politics etc _for the very same purpose_ of nazis and | fascist regimes: stop socialism. In the Soviet Union the same | thing happen: original Mensheviks were substituted with fascist | methods and money from Kaiser (to Lenin) and UK Crown (to Stalin) | with equal results. | | The same pattern happen far earlier with the French Revolution. | What can be really summarized is that technological progress | makes peoples less ignorant because we need that to progress, | that's make people less subject of religion and classic | "propaganda", so people want freedom, better life, elites do not | like that and when they can't overpower people organized enough | they try to parasite their fragile and inexperienced | organizations to reverse or revolutions apparently changing | everything, but practically changing just a little bit to keep | the ship up. | | Original nazism and fascism can't came back as they were today, | we are in a post-ideological society, creating a new cruel enemy | is not easy, convince people in a moment of deep _real_ crisis | due to scarce resources it 's complicated, so today the | propaganda instead of using nazism/fascism technique use another | more sound these days, the bolshevik one. With equal targets of | their ancestors. We see a came back in anti-sex, anti-abortion, | anti sex-parity propaganda, religions start to be back a bit, | reactionary movement grow, the very same that happen in the | '20s-'30s just with a different large political scheme. | Unfortunately populations remains super-influenced as Le Bon and | Bernays have described in their books... | | Personally I ask myself how can Democracy be possible with such | populations, because to have a Democracy we need Citizens, not | slaves. In the past sometimes people have raised, certainly not | really "commoners" in most cases there was always a "intermediate | elite" that drive the revolution, that was for French Revolution, | but also for Russian revolutions de facto made possible by the | Intelligentsia their emperor have created to modernize the | country, but such "middle class" have existed and these days I | almost do not see it anymore... Oh, yes, there are still wealthy | people, of course, but they are not anymore "middle class", witch | means active and acculturated people, they are just wealthy | mostly by heritage. Or to tell that in another way, as a nephew | of WWII Partisans my blood boil well but I see no point in a war | against windmills and at the same time I see no "new regime" move | to create a new feudal class exactly to avoid a push against the | newborn dictatorship... There might be no new ur-fascists heros | because they are not needed anymore, but definitively there are | too many quislings and many of them do not even see what they are | doing. At least classic nazism and fascism have symbols and | uniforms, it was easier to distinguish them for the masses. | zozbot234 wrote: | "Stop socialism"? Crony capitalism is just socialism that | happens to benefit a corrupt elite. (Most real-world socialism, | historically, was not very different. Even "socialism with | Scandinavian characteristics" - quite popular among some in the | present-day U.S. - owes much of its success to the way it | enables a smoothly functioning market to provide consistently | good outcomes.) | michannne wrote: | >"The puppet master of them was the classic capitalism that | deeply fear a thing: socialism. Those regimes ware created just | to stop socialism, for the sake of big capitals" | | I think this is a sorely misguided view, and if we had the | ability to pull a Nazi, Hitler included, directly from the | 30s/40s, they would disagree with this | xtian wrote: | Regardless of whether a Nazi would disagree for ideological | reasons, these facts are part of the historical record: | | 1) big capitalists within Germany and abroad funded and | supported Hitler | | 2) capitalist countries rejected repeated requests from the | USSR to form an anti-fascist alliance before WWII | peoplefromibiza wrote: | > 1) big capitalists within Germany and abroad funded and | supported Hitler | | of course, big capitals funded the leader of Germany that | by creating a giant war machine, was filling their pockets | with bags of money. | | > 2) capitalist countries rejected repeated requests from | the USSR to form an anti-fascist alliance before WWII | | But also Stalin provided substantial support to the nazis, | until 1941... | | I'm not saying you are wrong, but cherry picking facts | doesn't magically become history. | kkfx wrote: | Just try reading IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic | Alliance Between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful | Corporation by Edwin Black or if you can read french | "Libres d'obeir: Le management, du nazisme a aujourd'hui" | by Johann Chapoutot to start. | | From recent web resources I suggest: | | - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/17/nazis- | based-th... | | - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/23/uks- | propaganda... | | - https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/mar/31/louis-de- | berni... | | - https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/11/t | rump-... | | Just to pick the first I've read recently. The history | _not_ cherry-picked say a thing: when nazism and fascism | born their idea was common in all western countries from | their elites to some not-so-small cohort of their | populations. Just like today 's populism. | | BTW, yes Stalin (one who took money from UK Crown, with | the excuse of reliefs for Ukraine famine, via some formal | "NGOs" ante-litteram) have signed an agreement with the | nazi, but only after he understand that the western | countries will never be partners. And future development | have proved he have had good points, just read about | "Operation Unthinkable" and "Operation Dropshot"... | peoplefromibiza wrote: | > Just try reading IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic | Alliance Between Nazi Germany and America's Most Powerful | Corporati | | That's a well know fact. | | It is also a well know fact that USA went to the Moon | thanks to a nazi high ranking member, Wernher Von Braun. | | Of course the west was aligned with the "WASP" west and | not with the "commie" Russia, just like today: we side | with Ukraine and not with Putin's Russia mainly because | we wanna keep the western propaganda on "democracy and | freedom and the best lifestyle ever" alive and kicking, | not because we really believe that we share the same | values in the end. | | And because if we don't, the World will say that we're | helping Putin. | | Same thing happened in 1939, but reversed. | | Everyone was afraid of being infected by the "communist | revolution", not only the politicians, but the public | opinion too! | | It was a people's choice too, that lasted 70 years and | still nowadays you can hear people saying that "x is bad | because it's chinese and chinese are communists, so they | must be bad!". | | It's the tragedy of tribalism: us and them, good vs evil, | that kind of propaganda that we still endure today! | | > have signed an agreement with the nazi, but only after | he understand that the western countries will never be | partners. | | I love Stalin's mustache like everybody else, but history | is history: Stalin actually helped the nazis, they didn't | simply sign an agreement, with that pact they encouraged | Hitler to invade Poland, since there was no more | opposition on the east: Germany took the most of it, | Stalin invaded the eastern part. | | Also they gave ton of raw materials to Germany, for | example they contributed a lot to "Operation Barbarossa". | michannne wrote: | You are conflating the alignment based on a subset of | shared goals with shared origins. Capitalists supported | "some" of the things early Nazi Germany was doing, that | doesn't mean the Nazi purpose was to combat socialism | (although, if combatting socialism furthered their other | goals, then they wasted no time in doing that) | peoplefromibiza wrote: | > (I'm Italian, I know well what happen) | | You might be Italian, yet you fail to mention any notable | Italian family name, but I am Italian for real and this | sentence | | > Italy loose it's status of II grade European power, now | reduced to a corruptocracy mostly controlled by anglophone | neoliberals and local criminals | | doesn't make any sense at all. | | Historically, for starters. | | Your "essay" read mostly like some truth (capitalism in Italy | sided with fascism because, at laest at the beginning, their | interests were aligned - for example they both hated worker | unions and both feared the Bolshevik Revolution), but coated in | zeitgeit-ism (sorry for the bad neologism) | | Also the XVII Congress of the Italian Socialist Party that took | place in 1921 in Livorno ended up with the split between | socialists and communists in Italy, something that did not | really help the socialist cause in Italy. | | You produced what we call "populism" nowadays, even if yours | seems like coming from the left, it's still populism. | | If you are really Italian, you probably voted for the five star | movement, which means you are (big) part of the problem, not of | the solution. | kkfx wrote: | > You might be Italian, yet you fail to mention any notable | Italian family name | | The first name is Agnelli, the ones who say being fascist in | Rome and socialist in Turin, Pirelli, FIMM (Magneti Marelli), | Piaggio just to name few that still exists today. | | > If you are really Italian, you probably voted for the five | star movement | | I'm Italian, and no I do not voted M5S because coming from a | Partisans family I was trained to recognize fascism. The | original PNF and it's successors (I might know "Partito | dell'Uomo Qualunque" for instance) have started as the 5S, | apparently a left-ish, young and innovating party, but in | reality a PR engine to elicit consent. If you know Italian | history a bit you might know that Giorgio Bocca (one of the | famous Partisans commander) when young was one who took PNF | card with just two digit number, he learn after. The same | have happened in Germany, original nazism appear as a kind of | "moderated socialism". | | Actually in Italy there is exactly ZERO party I can vote, and | exactly no left parties. The most _left-ish_ read that three | time are Fratelli d 'Italia (YES, I'm not joking) and Lega, | of course not because their are really left-ish, they are | actually fascist, but they present themselves to the masses | with left-wing ideas speech and that's why they grab | consensus from "poor" working classes replacing historical | PC-derived parties like PD witch it's correct name should be | Partito Democristiano not Partito Democratico. | | I suggest a relatively modern song from what it left from the | real political left: | https://www.antiwarsongs.org/canzone.php?lang=it&id=61641 | perhaps together with | https://www.antiwarsongs.org/canzone.php?lang=it&id=219 and a | small history of how songs from Resistenza have been pushed | into oblivion substituting them with Bella Ciao almost no one | have chanted except perhaps some small white militia in | Tuscany or why in France famous song like "Le deserteur" | changing the last part from Prevenez vos | gendarmes Que j'emporte des armes Et que je | sais tirer | | to Que je n'aurai pas d'armes Et | qu'ils pourront tirer | | just to give few examples of the slow push toward a new | dictatorial society. | peoplefromibiza wrote: | > The first name is Agnelli, the ones who say being fascist | in Rome and socialist in Turin, Pirelli, FIMM (Magneti | Marelli), Piaggio just to name few that still exists today. | | Do you mean Elkann? :D :D :D | | Agnelli (I guess you mean Giovanni Agnelli, or | "L'avvocato") also financed this | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolyatti | | Which still exists | | It's the most popular scapegoat among Italian zeitgeist- | ers. | | > Actually in Italy there is exactly ZERO party I can vote, | and exactly no left parties | | CVD: the man criticizing "l'uomo qualunque" (the average | Joe) is the one expressing an average Joe's opinion. | | I am from a partisan family as well, all my family was | communist and fought for the freedom of Italy from nazi- | fascism, but the problem today on "our" side is exactly the | nostalgic leftist, that person that between Ukraine and | Russia shouts "take Italy out of NATO" | | > The same have happened in Germany, original nazism appear | as a kind of "moderated socialism" | | It always start with this giant lie with people like you... | | I know where you come from, don't even try, it doesn't work | with me. | | > The most left-ish read that three time are Fratelli | d'Italia | | And here it is the "I was trained to recognize fascism" | that goes out of the window! | | I'm not even curious to hear why, because I know very well | why. | | Unfortunately... | | > be Partito Democristiano not Partito Democratico | | as I've said: you're part of the problem, not of the | solution. | | You might as well voted for five stars, as the saying goes | "if it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, if it | quacks like a duck, it is a duck" | | > Prevenez vos gendarmes | | Sorry, I am born and raised Roman, I don't take lessons | from those that tried too many times to destroy my city | (and Italian lives with it), I side with the busts of | Gianicolo, not with the heirs of napoleon, who let his | troops stable their horses in the refectory were the | Leonardo's "Last Supper" is, ruining it forever that then | colonized Africa and lately put Libya in jeopardy just to | put their hands on Italian ENI gas infrastructure over | there... | B1FF_PSUVM wrote: | > slow push toward a new dictatorial society | | Why would 'they' do that, when they've become so adept at | selling anything to the public? | | With universal voting rights, you can tell the customers | you're just serving their wishes and there is no ground for | complaint. | | Playing a whole level up from "Pour la canaille la | mitraille", that's just incompetence nowadays. | lebubule wrote: | "even though I am much concerned about the various Nazi-like | movements that have arisen here and there in Europe, including | Russia, I do not think that Nazism, in its original form, is | about to reappear as a nationwide movement." | | "Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are | constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of | the enemy." | | "The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he | more frequently sends other people to death." | usrusr wrote: | "The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he | more frequently sends other people to death." | | Sounds like a perfect match for atomics... | popilewiz wrote: | motohagiography wrote: | While I think Eco is generally a muddled thinker with moments of | profound lucidity, I really don't think we're ever going to | separate fascism from being a euphemism for evil, and Eco's essay | elevated it from the woo of theology to something secular critics | can tilt at. There's not much to defend about it, it's that the | quality of interpretation and criticism of it is never more than | an arbitrary litany of its sins. (though he gave it a more than | fair treatment before deconstructing it) | | He's accurate that Mussolini's fascism was something different | from Nazi'ism (which just adopted and co-opted the italian | aestheitcs, directly), but it was more of a kind of secular anti- | clerical republicanism but with all the awe of divinely appointed | monarchs. | | The crux of fascism was the unity of corporate and state power | together - where Eco takes it in a few other directions, which I | think its disingenuous to de-emphasize this core property of it, | because I think he's also an elitist who would be glad to have | the reins of a unified corporate state. He's freighted an | obsolete political system with the countercases to his own | ideology and branded it evil. I was going to suggest Eco should | have stuck to fiction, but in this case he has. | | It was a peculiar reactionary artifact of the nation state, which | itself is a modern(ist) post-enlightenment phenomenon as | monarchies gave way to republics. It's different from | totalitarianism (as Eco notes) in that Mussolini, Franco, and | Salazar lacked the imperialist and colonial urges that would | define totalitarian movements of Hitler and Stalin (even though | the latter two inherited colonial territories). Post war, the | word fascism became just a secular version of evil as defined by | largely marxist/socialist thinkers, and fascist has become a kind | of a catch-all slur against those who assert people should be | accountable to principles. | | It didn't really matter before, as there was nothing to defend | about its vague and myriad definitions, and the people who spat | the word fascist at others didn't have enough control of | institutions for anyone to care what they meant by it. Today, | that it is a euphemism for Evil matters because the people | wielding it now are still only as sophisticated as a mob of | superstitious villagers, but its nebulous definition has come to | envelop some things I think regular people actually value, and | instead of Evil being presented as witchcraft, it's wrapped in | layers of critical theory, but the mob mentality is just the | same. Fascism doesn't have much going for it today as it was a | moment of 19th century nation states adopting 20th century | technology, but I'd say the people indexed on it now are just as | much of a mob as they ever were, and whatever they dress it up | in, they're the same people, still just hunting witches. | syntaxfree wrote: | Bravo! | | This comment might as well be Peak Hacker News. | motohagiography wrote: | How is your comment peak HN? | baud147258 wrote: | > Mussolini [...] lacked the imperialist and colonial urges | | I'm not sure this is congruent with Italy's actions in | Ethiopia, Albania and Greece. | throwawaybutwhy wrote: | Umberto Eco was one of the writers/thinkers whose 'profound | truths' later surprisingly turned into quite revolting | revelations. One of those whom I cannot trust at all. | praptak wrote: | To complement this I recommend Five Stages of Fascism by Robert | Paxton. He takes a temporal view of fascism rather than | ideological, reasoning that unlike most other -isms, fascism does | not have a body of works that define the ideology. On the | contrary, fascist movements despise coherent philosophies. | | So his focus is on development of fascist movements in time. | api wrote: | Fascism strikes me as the politics of the brain stem. To the | extent that it has an ideology at all it tends to be explicitly | _anti-rational_ and obsessed with power, hierarchy, and | mystical destiny. | | I wonder if it's kind of a postmodern version of the old school | militant theocratic monarchy. Like a theocracy without god, or | without a coherent religious doctrine. | | I know that postmodernist thought post-dated fascism but the | fascist aesthetic strikes me as very postmodern. Ideas are | tools for power. Nothing is true, only power. | throwaways85989 wrote: | Ideas are the shackles of the neuro-facists (superior | intelligence should get away with all things) for the stupid. | To not accept any concept or idea, but that of power, could | be interpreted as resistance to a eternally explained away | opening scissor of redistributed wealth in a society. | | Take also the tendency of intelligence to produce ever less | scientific break-troughs producing surplus for all and ever | more parasitism (Encapsulating companies predating on | established industries), a not "hackable" aka anti- | intellectual resistance might be all that remains. | | Parasitism is also a large "topic" in fascism, be it | redistributing parasitism (left bureaucracy), lawful | parasitism ( citizens exploited by law-constellations) or | plain anti-semitism, which todays miracolously _onaires | escaped - for now._ Cough* social engineering _cough_ for the | rescue. | | Another large topic is "walling off" against the "stranger". | As the unlearned are in a much harsher competition against | the other unlearned, a walled of society to reduce that | competition is preferred. | | Also a recurring topic, is past injustice, which justifies | current and future injustices, perpetrated. It really is just | a falling apart of any semblance of intellectual problem | solving, into a tribal mindset, taken for a ride by a | miserable counter-elite. | pram wrote: | I think it was extremely modernist, personally. The | narrative, grandeur and mystical destiny make it more | modernist than post-modernist. Like a lot of the late | 19th/early 20th century ideologies, civilization was | inevitably and imminently heading towards the eschaton. | Society had to be reformed and restructured to bring about | this glorious material utopia. | | It's definitely about feelings and aesthetics, rather than | economic or rational concerns though. You saw similar | constructions in fringe communist regimes (Romania, North | Korea) | [deleted] | michannne wrote: | I liken far left extremism to descending from obsessive | generalization, and far right extremism descending from | obsessive categorization - from the latter of which emerges | hierarchies, divisions based on things like race or genetics, | and pissing contests based on labels. | donatj wrote: | > pissing contests based on labels | | I'm getting a lot of that from both sides. | michannne wrote: | Intersectionality paradoxically requires obsessive | categorization while being promoted by those who are | obsessive generalists | trhway wrote: | >Fascism strikes me as the politics of the brain stem. | | not surprisingly that German's back then and the today's | Russian fascism (which is closer to German Nazism than to | Italian fascism) each appeared after a decade of economic and | political disorder and were precipitated by a terroristic | acts after which tired and scared people happily clang to the | promise of order and stability by a "strong hand". | | Germany - military defeat and crash of empire, the decade of | disorder, the burn of Reichstag leads to Hitler taking total | power, a decade of tightening of all political screws and | huge nationalistic "master race" propaganda, directly | appealing to the brain stem and thus supported by population, | culminate in genocidal (wrt. Jews and Slavic) war. | | Russia - military defeat (Cold War and Afghanistan) and crash | of empire, the decade of disorder, the multiple apartment | building by FSB in September of 1999 leads to Putin taking | total power, 2 decades of tightening of all political screws | and huge nationalistic "master nation" ("Great Russia | chauvinism") propaganda, the same way directly appealing to | the brain stem and thus supported by population, culminate in | the genocidal war against Ukrainians (UN genocide definition | https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml). If | history is any guide there is no other end here except like | in WWII - the coalition should take over Russia and | completely denazify and demilitarize it like it was done to | Germany. Such profound war loss and failure of society and | the following rework of country and society is what gets to | the population's brain stem. Just beating the military like | in WWI isn't enough as it only excites that basic instinct of | tribal nationalism. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-20 23:00 UTC)