[HN Gopher] Technicolor Tokyo ___________________________________________________________________ Technicolor Tokyo Author : keiferski Score : 258 points Date : 2022-03-27 06:41 UTC (2 days ago) (HTM) web link (neocha.com) (TXT) w3m dump (neocha.com) | presentation wrote: | Too bad it includes just a 500m radius around Shinjuku station at | night. Tourist fantasy version of Tokyo. | keiferski wrote: | If you like this style and subject matter (Japan at night), I | also recommend this short film about a taxi driver-turned- | photographer: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiGEy6YX2tk | | And his website: | | https://issuienomoto.com | | Not quite _cyberpunk_ but in the same aesthetic universe. | tjpnz wrote: | What does it for me is the rain and how the neon reflects off the | puddles. Yes there's some colour manipulation at play here but | you'll still get a similar vibe walking through Shinjuku on a wet | night. | k2enemy wrote: | His book, TO:KY:OO is incredible. If you enjoyed the photos in | this article it is worth checking out. It oozes cyberpunk. | Thaxll wrote: | What kind of device you need to take such colorful / detailed | pictures, or is it the post-processing? | ruairidhwm wrote: | Most of this will be post-processed. You can get a decent | camera + lens which helps, as well as a good eye for | photography. The rest is shooting in RAW and knowing how to use | Lightroom to get the most out of your photo. | dmos62 wrote: | Is shooting in RAW important? Are we just talking about | PNG/JPG artefacts and general lossiness of lossy compression? | theIV wrote: | I saw this article pop up the other day which goes fairly | deep on the importance of RAW: | https://lux.camera/understanding-proraw/. This is focused | on iPhone photography, but there's plenty of other detail | in there, especially the first half or so. | EricE wrote: | Another reason to shoot RAW - you can always reprocess the | image later without loss. Newer algorithms pop up all the | time and with RAW you can always start over from scratch. | With storage being so cheap and computers as powerful as | they are, theres little reason to not at least shoot | RAW+JPEG. Having the option of the RAW file available for | that magic shot is powerful. Even in the article the | photographer mentions he didn't realize he captured one of | his favorite photos when it happened - he only discovered | it later. | ruairidhwm wrote: | Yeah a RAW image is like a 'digital negative' so it | preserves all the data that the sensor in the camera | captures. A JPEG or similar is processed and compressed so | the camera makes some decisions and 'bakes in' stylistic | choices which are much harder to fix in post. | | You can read a bit more about it here: | https://photographylife.com/raw-vs-jpeg | loansindi wrote: | Shooting RAW gives you much more freedom to choose how a | photo will be processed than letting the camera make some | set of default choices about color rendering so it can spit | out a JPG. | EricE wrote: | Yup - you can even use RAW processing from other sources | and not just the camera manufacturer. If you only ever | save JPEGs on camera then you are completely at the mercy | of the camera manufacturer with no way to every change it | if you don't care for the way it processed the raw image | into the JPEG. | hh3k0 wrote: | You lose more than quality when not shooting RAW. You are | going to want all the data captured by the image sensor of | your camera if you are going to edit your photographs later | on, it gives you more to work with: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raw_image_format#Benefits. | suction wrote: | Love the colours but would have preferred this style applied to a | less played out but more interesting visual aesthetic than Tokyo. | whicks wrote: | His latest work, After Dark, has a more global focus: | | "Following his debut monograph, TO:KY:OO, which captured | Tokyo's beauty at night, Wong widens his lens from the city | that became his spiritual and photographic muse to Osaka and | Kyoto, London and Seoul, Paris and Rome. But he goes still | further, seeking the rich tapestries of nightlife in the foggy | historical streets of his hometown Edinburgh, penetrating the | backstreets of the megacity Chongqing, and seizing the | verticality of Hong Kong from its rooftops." | | - https://vol.co/product/after-dark/ | arez wrote: | Anyone knows where I could buy a picture/poster from him? They're | all out-of-stock on his website | ThinkingGuy wrote: | I was unable to scroll through that page without hearing | Vangelis' "Blade Runner" theme music in my head. | ajmurmann wrote: | It's mentioned in the article house much the cinematographer of | Blade Runner influenced the artist | unfocused wrote: | Talk about going down the rabbit hole, I ended up being | interested in the link to Tokyo Jazz joints, unrelated to the | Technicolor Tokyo: https://neocha.com/magazine/tokyo-jazz-joints/ | cyberpunk wrote: | Murakami used to own one apparently, I'm not sure why but I'm | drawn to this location. Perhaps I'll go visit and a cat will | follow me home or a weird tiny version of the kfc colonel will | tempt me into a well something. | have_faith wrote: | As someone very much into the noir-cyberpunk-always-dark-and- | rainy aesthetic I don't find the overly saturated and edited | photos that appealing personally. Especially when lots of purple | and teal is added and boosted. I find it only highlights the lack | of real content in the photo (people shot mostly from behind | holding umbrellas). No snide intended, the photographer is | obviously talented, just a personal take on subject matter | choice. | the_af wrote: | I get what you mean. Some of the photos are indeed very | uninspired; the worst in my opinion is the SEGA photo, what | does it have going for it except heavily retouched colors? | | I like some of the others though. The saturation make them feel | cartoony. Plus neon and umbrellas will always remind me of | Blade Runner, one of my favorite movies ever. | aikinai wrote: | I strongly agree with you. But at least these are some of the | best examples of this type of photography I've seen. Most just | crank the pseudo-HDR effect and saturation, maybe add some | split-toning, and look now it's Bladerunner! But these are | actually quite good if this is the aesthetic you're going for. | cush wrote: | The article mentions that that's what the artist is going for. | I mean, the article is even titled _Technicolor_ Tokyo. | robstarck wrote: | His recent book is more filmic in nature | https://www.instagram.com/p/CJWaVYLJKrR/ | weekendvampire wrote: | Can you obviously tell that the photos have been edited? That's | disappointing - I thought they were all unfiltered and was | really impressed. | Mikeb85 wrote: | Anything that comes out of a camera is 'edited' in a sense... | Camera lenses distort images versus what the human eye sees. | Aperture and shutter settings change the image. Different | films capture light differently. In-camera processing does | the same. And that's before 'editing'. | mrandish wrote: | > Can you obviously tell that the photos have been edited? | | It's incredibly obvious to me. Reality just doesn't look like | that to the naked eye. Although I'm experienced in | photography, cinematography and digital imaging, I'm still | always surprised so many regular viewers don't realize almost | everything seen in films and TV shows is carefully planned, | constructed, processed and manipulated to achieve the visual | looks they see as 'normal'. To be clear, I'm not only talking | about the more obvious special effects and 'beauty shots'. | Just making a typical scene from daily life look realistic on | camera often requires painstaking craftsmanship. | | You might enjoy looking at some making-of documentaries | focused on cinematography. In the area of this urban | nighttime noir-cyberpunk look, I'd suggest watching the | behind-the-scenes material included in the Blu-Ray boxed-set | of Blade Runner. It goes into fascinating detail on how | cinematographer Jordan Cronenwith pioneered this look. I | remember seeing Blade Runner in a theater when it first came | out (I was in high school). I found the visual style to be so | stunning it inspired my lifelong interest in imaging. Today, | so much of what we see in movies looks 'Blade-Runner-ish' | that we hardly notice it but prior to BR _nothing_ looked | like that in cinema. | have_faith wrote: | Surpised others didn't catch your sarcasm. My contention | isn't that they are edited, or really to the degree that they | are, it's that they are both highly edited and empty of | interesting subject matter combined. I think this makes the | editing stand out more as a negative as opposed to if they | were this edited and also had highly interesting scenes or | subjects. | | Obviously all extremely subjective but street photography | already has a running meme of people photographing people's | backs or from far away. | grapeskin wrote: | Japan looks nothing like this. The second pic in the article, | the entrance to Kabukicho, is about as real as it gets in | that article. And that area, just a couple blocks wide, is | where 99% of all "cyberpunk" photos are taken since it's the | area with the most signs and sex shops. | | Most parts of basically every part of Tokyo are quite grey | and plain. Not even 1% as beautiful as pictures would lead | you to believe. | | Nature and temple photos are the opposite. Even if they're | edited to the absurd degree these are, they don't capture the | beauty of the places in real life. | com2kid wrote: | > Most parts of basically every part of Tokyo are quite | grey and plain. | | I wouldn't call it plain, plenty of beauty all around. | | Definitely not neon colored though. :) | des429 wrote: | Well, to each their own. I find Tokyo's greenery and street | gardens to be the most attractive parts of the city ;-). | You're right about the lights and it's kind of hard to | believe people think Tokyo looks like these pictures. | olingern wrote: | > Japan looks nothing like this. | | As a former resident, I disagree. While they are edited, | some of them remind of rainy nights in Ogikubo. | | If you're interpreting photography as capturing the most | accurate version of our vision system, then you're going to | be very disappointed with any photograph. | | I really enjoy this photographer's perspective. He captures | photos as if you're viewing them from the "mind's eye." A+ | work IMO. | wbsss4412 wrote: | Any photo is going to be a result of choices by the | photographer. There's no reason to fetishize "unfiltered" | photos. | ajmurmann wrote: | The article mentions that the photographer didn't see himself | as a photographer for a while because he modifies the photos | so much. | kripke wrote: | They are indeed edited, it is mentioned in the article: "My | approach to photography is similar to filmmaking, in how they | take a shot and build off it with color grades and adding | effects. It's less photography in the traditional sense and | more of a hybrid. I'm not a photojournalist." | jwcacces wrote: | Beautiful photos, but on a webpage designed to show them off, why | desaturate / lighten them on mouse over? | onemoresoop wrote: | It's the artist's choice. | tanh wrote: | I had great times playing CS 1.6 with Liam when we were teens. | I'm glad he found an audience; always seemed like he'd go far in | life. :-) | Shinchy wrote: | I bought his (Liam Wong's) coffee table book and I have to say | the photography in it is fantastic. | ekianjo wrote: | So guy takes photos with a DLSR and pimps the colors so that | everything becomes oversaturated blue and red and suddenly it's | art? Color me unimpressed. | [deleted] | annowiki wrote: | I did a double take because I've been using pictures from | unsplash found by searching "tokyo night"[0] and "night city"[1] | for wallpapers and they're nearly identical in color, saturation, | and mood. I just rechecked because I thought maybe someone was | stealing his work. Nope, they're originals, but amazingly | similar. | | [0]: https://unsplash.com/s/photos/tokyo-night [1]: | https://unsplash.com/s/photos/night-city | | Duncan Lewis's look especially similar, especially this one: | https://unsplash.com/photos/_iS8zogaLcg | | It's nearly identical to the left image from the fourth set from | the top. | picklesman wrote: | Not to be too snarky, but the location itself does a lot of the | work ;) | | To contribute something more positive, I've been following this | photographer who does great POV videos of these very areas (and | who also produces/obtains similar images) | | Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ac6fDzsnhfQ | tomphoolery wrote: | I think the first image here is what's used on the Philips Hue | animated scene for Tokyo. Definitely the same colors. | grapeskin wrote: | I will never understand why people make fake pictures of Japan | like this but absolutely no other country. It seems like Taiwan's | or Hong Kong's night markets would be a better foundation with | all their gaudy lighting, but nope. Take a normal grey pic of a | random side street in Tokyo and blast it with fake neon. | yadaeno wrote: | Not only that, most of the pictures in this style come from the | same street in Shinjuku called Kabukichou. | robstarck wrote: | These are his early works from when he was starting out | ghostDancer wrote: | If you like the style the subreddit | https://www.reddit.com/r/neoncities/ while you find lots of | photos of Japan , there are lot of photos from other places of | the world and not only Asian cities. Most of them not as good | as Liam Wong ones though. | cthalupa wrote: | You can go on 500px and flickr and find plenty of examples of | this style of photography for Taiwan, Hong Kong, as well as all | sorts of western cities. | | I'd guess there being more Western exposure to it in Japan is | due to fairly famous bits of Japanese media embracing the | cyberpunk/neo-noir aesthetic, a la Akira, Ghost in the Shell, | etc., as well as Japanese photographers being fairly active on | the previously mentioned photo sites. | tjpnz wrote: | I live in Tokyo and I promise you that none of the side streets | near me look remotely like these, regardless of whatever | filters or processing you applied. | cthalupa wrote: | Yeah. I imagine people who look at this sort of photography | would probably recognize Golden Gai if they were dropped into | the middle of it just because of how many shots like these | are taken there, heh. | oldstrangers wrote: | "Tokyo after midnight, a time that even locals may rarely see." | | This line is so ridiculous to me. There's no where in the world | as lively after midnight as Tokyo. | distantsounds wrote: | hardly "technicolor" when you over-saturate all your photos with | the same tinge of magenta and blue to the point of it not even | looking real. | | but hey, everyone wants to live in a cyberpunk dystopia | etblg wrote: | I would argue the style is kind of orthogonal to the style of | Technicolour film. The light sources are all natural | environmental lights with a deep dynamic range in dark | nighttime environments. | | Technicolour films (the more modern three-strip ones, because | these are even farther removed from the original two-strip | films, where you would only see shades of green and red) in the | heyday of those films were marked by very bright open stage | environments blasted by gigantic spot lights illuminating | everything in front of the camera. The films were so slow | (we're talking like 10 ISO during the 50s) that you needed to | blast everything with light or it just would not show up. | ekianjo wrote: | especially since it looks nothing like the real colors of | Tokyo. But hey with Photoshop you can make everything look | completely over the top. | bespokedevelopr wrote: | I love the pictures. They invoke a sense of excitement and | allure. Highlighting the way the light falls on the different | architecture and objects around it. | | For folks with nothing nice to say, try saying less. | 0xbadcafebee wrote: | Yeah, I don't get the hate. I don't need art to be realistic or | complex, I just want it to look pretty. | tidenly wrote: | Not hating on the artist in particular here, but at this | point this style is so derivative and worn out it almost | reminds me of the "sand filter" americans put on scenes meant | to take place in mexico or the middle east. Obviously not all | art needs to portray things as they are, but this doesnt seem | to offer much of anything of meaning - and if you're just | looking for the most simple "looks pretty" standard, I'd say | this type of filter / style almost detracts from the | photography. | | I live in Tokyo and know like 10 different photographers | pumping out this style. | rkachowski wrote: | I find it jarring that there is implied to be something | noble around withholding criticism of an art style. | deepspace wrote: | But that's the whole point of the criticism. It only looks | "pretty" to very naive eyes. If you are used to the genre, | these photos are bland at best and downright bad/ugly for the | most part. | brankoB wrote: | This is my favourite genre and I think the photos are quite | nice. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-03-29 23:00 UTC)