[HN Gopher] Zooming into the Sun with Solar Orbiter ___________________________________________________________________ Zooming into the Sun with Solar Orbiter Author : mhb Score : 67 points Date : 2022-04-04 18:14 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.esa.int) (TXT) w3m dump (www.esa.int) | drunksun wrote: | shmde wrote: | I didn't expect it to be this lackluster and ugly. | danrochman wrote: | Are you my mother? | dEnigma wrote: | Interesting. I'm looking at the same image and find it | stunningly beautiful. De gustibus non est disputandum, I guess. | mttjj wrote: | Easy to miss: Earth to scale in the top right of the photo. | | And to think there are stars in our galaxy that would dwarf our | Sun to the same degree! Pale Blue Dot indeed... | svnpenn wrote: | That blog has one of my favorite posts: | | https://kottke.org/17/05/the-struggle-with-the-self | emptybits wrote: | "a mosaic of 25 individual images is needed to cover the entire | Sun. Taken one after the other, the full image was captured over | a period of more than four hours because each tile takes about 10 | minutes" | | I would love to hear a bit about how movement captured across | tile boundaries over the course of four hours was handled when | stitching the pano. AI and/or human retouching could be involved | which, IMO, are both acceptable to get such an amazing image. | Just curious! | adzm wrote: | I really love the compilations by Sean Doran of our Sun -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI0oVK4Pa44 for example. Perfect | ambient background video. | danparsonson wrote: | Original here: | https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2022/03/The_Sun_in... | dang wrote: | We changed the URL from https://kottke.org/22/04/the-highest- | resolution-photo-of-the..., which points to this. | pb060 wrote: | You can see the Human Torch on the top left. | web007 wrote: | I can't believe that this is the highest-resolution photo of the | sun that ESA has taken. Surely earth-based telescopes have done | better? | | A guy in his backyard takes pictures with similar resolution: | https://twitter.com/AJamesMcCarthy/status/147297870519032217... | (downscaled for Twitter, approx 9Kx9K / 81Mpix on his Patreon | feed) | brunosan wrote: | The part that is confusing is highest resolution (1) full-disk | and (2) outer atmosphere: (1) "Full-disk" is clear to | understand: the higher the resolution, ^2 the work to make it | also full-disk (especially when the Sun rotates differentially | and evolves in high-cadence, so you gotta be fast. (2) "Outer | atmosphere" is also tricky as only few wavelengths see the | outer atmosphere. The vast majority of the light comes from the | "surface" or photosphere (hence the name). In this case | surface, the highest resolution is roughly 0.05 arcsec or | 50km/pixel. But to see the outer parts, you have to do to | emission of elements like Iron that only emit when highly | ionized and super high temperatures (those are the special | characteristics of the sun's outer atmosphere... yes, it's way | hotter than the surface, just WAY less dense). Those emissions | happen in the Ultraviolet, 17 nanometers, like the caption | says. That's like 50 times smaller wavelength. Angular | resolution is proportional to wavelength | (1.22*wavelength/Diameter) which is on the order of 1000 | km/pixel (but linear resolution makes less sense since the | atmosphere is such a 3D shape... it's better to say 1 arcsec of | resolution). | | I might be too biased (I'm a solar physicist) but the | explanation above makes the image way cooler and they should | have added it): The most detailed image of the Sun's metal | corona :D | baggy_trough wrote: | Make sure to look at the high resolution 50+ MB image and zoom | in. | gbear605 wrote: | You can take an arbitrarily high pixel count photo of anything | with enough cameras side by side. But this is exciting (to | scientists) because it's taking the photos in specific | wavelength and outside of the Earth's atmosphere. | adrianwaj wrote: | If only there was a way to safely and economically send Earth's | garbage into it! | drcongo wrote: | You mean humans? | [deleted] | Ourgon wrote: | How edgy. You first, m'kay? Together with the telephone | cleaners, middle managers etc. Don't wait for us, we need | clean telephones when we arrive. | bdamm wrote: | It would be easier to send the garbage to the moon, Mars, or | even Jupiter. With enough Delta-V we could atomize garbage on | impact to the moon. | wolverine876 wrote: | Couldn't we just aim something in the right direction, give | it a little thrust, and then forget about it? There's no rush | after it has left earth. | jrapdx3 wrote: | Don't know, but I don't think we'd want mountains of trash | (whatever its composition) to wind up orbiting Earth. AFAIK | a lot of energy/thrust/velocity is necessary to escape | Earth gravity altogether. I'd guess launching stuff into | deep space is expensive. Considering how much trash humans | generate, well, space disposal isn't practical. | | Besides "trash" could be a useful resource. To some extent | it's already done. Some is convertible to energy. Other | fractions (plastics, metals) recycled to make new stuff, | etc. Could these uses be extended? I can't say, but more | R&D is likely a better investment vs. rocketing trash away. | wolverine876 wrote: | > AFAIK a lot of energy/thrust/velocity is necessary to | escape Earth gravity altogether. | | I was responding to the claim that it would be easier to | send trash to Jupiter, etc. than the sun. Yes, escaping | Earth's gravity in the first place would be a major | expense. | | > I don't think we'd want mountains of trash (whatever | its composition) to wind up orbiting Earth. | | While I probably agree, there is a lot more room up there | than down here! | Ourgon wrote: | If you can atomize garbage it'd be useful as reaction mass | for some space transport - one step closer to _Mr. Fusion_ | from Back to the Future. | ghastmaster wrote: | It is a mosaic with 25 images captured over the course of 4 | hours. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-04 23:00 UTC)