[HN Gopher] Zooming into the Sun with Solar Orbiter
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Zooming into the Sun with Solar Orbiter
        
       Author : mhb
       Score  : 67 points
       Date   : 2022-04-04 18:14 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.esa.int)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.esa.int)
        
       | drunksun wrote:
        
       | shmde wrote:
       | I didn't expect it to be this lackluster and ugly.
        
         | danrochman wrote:
         | Are you my mother?
        
         | dEnigma wrote:
         | Interesting. I'm looking at the same image and find it
         | stunningly beautiful. De gustibus non est disputandum, I guess.
        
       | mttjj wrote:
       | Easy to miss: Earth to scale in the top right of the photo.
       | 
       | And to think there are stars in our galaxy that would dwarf our
       | Sun to the same degree! Pale Blue Dot indeed...
        
       | svnpenn wrote:
       | That blog has one of my favorite posts:
       | 
       | https://kottke.org/17/05/the-struggle-with-the-self
        
       | emptybits wrote:
       | "a mosaic of 25 individual images is needed to cover the entire
       | Sun. Taken one after the other, the full image was captured over
       | a period of more than four hours because each tile takes about 10
       | minutes"
       | 
       | I would love to hear a bit about how movement captured across
       | tile boundaries over the course of four hours was handled when
       | stitching the pano. AI and/or human retouching could be involved
       | which, IMO, are both acceptable to get such an amazing image.
       | Just curious!
        
       | adzm wrote:
       | I really love the compilations by Sean Doran of our Sun --
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI0oVK4Pa44 for example. Perfect
       | ambient background video.
        
       | danparsonson wrote:
       | Original here:
       | https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2022/03/The_Sun_in...
        
       | dang wrote:
       | We changed the URL from https://kottke.org/22/04/the-highest-
       | resolution-photo-of-the..., which points to this.
        
       | pb060 wrote:
       | You can see the Human Torch on the top left.
        
       | web007 wrote:
       | I can't believe that this is the highest-resolution photo of the
       | sun that ESA has taken. Surely earth-based telescopes have done
       | better?
       | 
       | A guy in his backyard takes pictures with similar resolution:
       | https://twitter.com/AJamesMcCarthy/status/147297870519032217...
       | (downscaled for Twitter, approx 9Kx9K / 81Mpix on his Patreon
       | feed)
        
         | brunosan wrote:
         | The part that is confusing is highest resolution (1) full-disk
         | and (2) outer atmosphere: (1) "Full-disk" is clear to
         | understand: the higher the resolution, ^2 the work to make it
         | also full-disk (especially when the Sun rotates differentially
         | and evolves in high-cadence, so you gotta be fast. (2) "Outer
         | atmosphere" is also tricky as only few wavelengths see the
         | outer atmosphere. The vast majority of the light comes from the
         | "surface" or photosphere (hence the name). In this case
         | surface, the highest resolution is roughly 0.05 arcsec or
         | 50km/pixel. But to see the outer parts, you have to do to
         | emission of elements like Iron that only emit when highly
         | ionized and super high temperatures (those are the special
         | characteristics of the sun's outer atmosphere... yes, it's way
         | hotter than the surface, just WAY less dense). Those emissions
         | happen in the Ultraviolet, 17 nanometers, like the caption
         | says. That's like 50 times smaller wavelength. Angular
         | resolution is proportional to wavelength
         | (1.22*wavelength/Diameter) which is on the order of 1000
         | km/pixel (but linear resolution makes less sense since the
         | atmosphere is such a 3D shape... it's better to say 1 arcsec of
         | resolution).
         | 
         | I might be too biased (I'm a solar physicist) but the
         | explanation above makes the image way cooler and they should
         | have added it): The most detailed image of the Sun's metal
         | corona :D
        
         | baggy_trough wrote:
         | Make sure to look at the high resolution 50+ MB image and zoom
         | in.
        
         | gbear605 wrote:
         | You can take an arbitrarily high pixel count photo of anything
         | with enough cameras side by side. But this is exciting (to
         | scientists) because it's taking the photos in specific
         | wavelength and outside of the Earth's atmosphere.
        
       | adrianwaj wrote:
       | If only there was a way to safely and economically send Earth's
       | garbage into it!
        
         | drcongo wrote:
         | You mean humans?
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | Ourgon wrote:
           | How edgy. You first, m'kay? Together with the telephone
           | cleaners, middle managers etc. Don't wait for us, we need
           | clean telephones when we arrive.
        
         | bdamm wrote:
         | It would be easier to send the garbage to the moon, Mars, or
         | even Jupiter. With enough Delta-V we could atomize garbage on
         | impact to the moon.
        
           | wolverine876 wrote:
           | Couldn't we just aim something in the right direction, give
           | it a little thrust, and then forget about it? There's no rush
           | after it has left earth.
        
             | jrapdx3 wrote:
             | Don't know, but I don't think we'd want mountains of trash
             | (whatever its composition) to wind up orbiting Earth. AFAIK
             | a lot of energy/thrust/velocity is necessary to escape
             | Earth gravity altogether. I'd guess launching stuff into
             | deep space is expensive. Considering how much trash humans
             | generate, well, space disposal isn't practical.
             | 
             | Besides "trash" could be a useful resource. To some extent
             | it's already done. Some is convertible to energy. Other
             | fractions (plastics, metals) recycled to make new stuff,
             | etc. Could these uses be extended? I can't say, but more
             | R&D is likely a better investment vs. rocketing trash away.
        
               | wolverine876 wrote:
               | > AFAIK a lot of energy/thrust/velocity is necessary to
               | escape Earth gravity altogether.
               | 
               | I was responding to the claim that it would be easier to
               | send trash to Jupiter, etc. than the sun. Yes, escaping
               | Earth's gravity in the first place would be a major
               | expense.
               | 
               | > I don't think we'd want mountains of trash (whatever
               | its composition) to wind up orbiting Earth.
               | 
               | While I probably agree, there is a lot more room up there
               | than down here!
        
           | Ourgon wrote:
           | If you can atomize garbage it'd be useful as reaction mass
           | for some space transport - one step closer to _Mr. Fusion_
           | from Back to the Future.
        
       | ghastmaster wrote:
       | It is a mosaic with 25 images captured over the course of 4
       | hours.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-04 23:00 UTC)