[HN Gopher] The remarkable brain of a carpet cleaner who speaks ... ___________________________________________________________________ The remarkable brain of a carpet cleaner who speaks 24 languages Author : NaOH Score : 68 points Date : 2022-04-05 15:31 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.washingtonpost.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.washingtonpost.com) | rectang wrote: | > _The way Vaughn describes it, any time he reads something in a | book, he can remember it almost perfectly. When he returned to | school, he had even more to say, and more that he could | understand._ | | Giant caudate nucleus at work? | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpTCZ-hO6iI&t=700s | radicaldreamer wrote: | Can we grow it? | bradhe wrote: | Fuck paywalls. | masturbayeser wrote: | how brave of you | regpertom wrote: | This could be done with a few people eg: "The remarkable brain of | a nightclub bouncer with the worlds highest IQ." | | The article talks of him like he's a child. Bouncing around at | all the attention. Thrilled to make new friends. Bordering on | mockery. Hidden behind wonder, the call goes out: look at you, | who are not one of us. A carnival ride for the writer, gather | 'round everyone! | | Smart enough to do anything he wants, not smart enough to be | normal. | | "There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered | mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. | Too weird to live, and too rare to die." | pcthrowaway wrote: | I wonder if he'd have a natural aptitude for programming | languages also | kzrdude wrote: | Programming languages are nothing like natural languages | NineStarPoint wrote: | The skills that make you good at picking up your third+ | natural language should be similar to the skills that make | you good at picking up your third+ programming language. | (With extra programming languages being much easier to pick | up than extra natural languages, in my experience) | | The guy might struggle with picking up programming to begin | with though, it is indeed a completely different thing from | human language. | pcthrowaway wrote: | You think? There's syntax, grammar, and idioms. Of course | there are significant differences, but there's significant | overlap too. As someone not linguistically inclined, I also | notice myself looking for the name of the built-in method of | a programming language I've used for 5 years. One might | imagine a person with a better memory for vocabulary would be | more capable of remembering the word/method name without | needing to look it up. | giraffe_lady wrote: | "Does having an aptitude for spoken languages mean you'll | have an aptitude for programming languages" is a different | question from "are programming languages languages" even if | the answer to both questions is the same. | | But linguists have approached this question from time to | time! The main stumbling block is highly literate people | are inclined to think of writing as language but it's not, | quite. You can have multiple writing systems for the same | spoken language, or be fluent but illiterate. But you can't | comprehend a writing system for a language you can't speak, | barring disability. | | So programming languages do have grammar, but not the other | components of a language. Idioms in programming are a | metaphor referencing linguistic idioms but structurally | they aren't the same. Programming languages are more | similar to writing systems, and a lot of linguistics | findings do apply to them when taken in that context. | | You can play around with this idea if you want. Try to | convey meaning to someone using only a programming language | and nothing else. This is tricky because they embed our | other writing systems, so you need to be careful not to | accidentally convey meaning with eg variable names. Might | be best to use something like brainfuck or piet that | prevents that entirely. If it's a language in the "human | languages" sense, you'll be able to convey _any arbitrary | meaning_ to another person who knows that programming | language, even if you don 't share a spoken one. | | What ends up happening is you can only do this if you | reference a shared spoken language. So you can warp a PL | into a writing system, but you can't use it alone to | communicate. | ravi-delia wrote: | That's exactly why I'd be interested to see if he could pick | them up too. They're much more procedural, less meaning and | more grammar. It might make it easier to see what's improved | in his brain. | jjtheblunt wrote: | i wondered the same, and then thought programming languages and | their ecosystems go through different evolutionary pressures | than natural language. | | and then i realized i still have no intuition as to the answer. | | just it's a great question. glad you wrote it down. | Ir0nMan wrote: | https://archive.ph/fRyEl | ars wrote: | "but after a bout of depression" | | And now I know why he's not working another job. Depression is | the life killer. | blunte wrote: | It sounds in several places in the article like he has a severe | case of impostor syndrome. | | Fortunately (spoiler) at the end of the article, after his time | at the MIT research lab, he sees that some traditionally super | smart people value him and see him as intellectually special. | neovive wrote: | Amazing! Almost like a real-life "Good Will Hunting" story. | radicaldreamer wrote: | Heartwarming story | dvh wrote: | First 5 languages are the hardest ;) | B1FF_PSUVM wrote: | Meh. Can hack my way out of a wet paperbag in 5 or 6 european | languages, puzzle out Greek/Cyrillic if desperate. Once knew a | few katakana characters. | | Totally dumb and illiterate in Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Thai, | whatever. No prospects of improvement. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-06 23:00 UTC)