[HN Gopher] Your competitor wrote the RFP you're bidding on ___________________________________________________________________ Your competitor wrote the RFP you're bidding on Author : asyncscrum Score : 175 points Date : 2022-04-06 14:48 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.sofuckingagile.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.sofuckingagile.com) | Andy_G11 wrote: | If the actual bid is not going to go your way no matter what, and | if possible, just advertise subsidiary products which might be | bolt-ons to other projects that the customer may want. That way, | you give the sham process a veneer of respectability (which will | no doubt be appreciated by both competitors and customer) and | still get to raise the customer's awareness of some things that | they might actually want to buy from you. | Mulpze15 wrote: | ROI of RFPs... It is so depressing for me to spend time on an RFP | that I won't do it unless I am 100% convinced the RFP was written | for me, because I know the account/people. | | It's not just the time spent on it, it's the feeling of | powerlessness and wasting time you could be spending on something | much more fulfilling. | | So much more fun to say "no, I won't bid" after a few emails, | with little work behind it. | antiterra wrote: | I worked for a company that was incredibly high touch and kept | getting burned by inadvertently giving free consulting on system | design only for the customer to just hire a generic development | contractor to implement it. | | They thought they got smart by adding a contract to the process | that had a six digit contracting fee if the customer went with | another vendor. | | The first big fish was more than happy to pay their consulting | fee and then develop everything in house. To them, the fee (which | didn't really cover the opportunity cost or development time) was | a pittance. | tetha wrote: | Oh RFPs are an everlasting source of fun in B2B. | | Like, we've received the wrong questionaire once. It contained | the question what we would do if armed forces intruded into our | secured facilities to seize assets. We eventually settled on the | answer "Run or hide, while calling the cops". At that point the | customer noticed their error and it was pretty funny. | | In other areas, the consulting teams and us are developing some | degree of a safe word system. Ask us in operations for something | the right way and we can give an annoying answer how nothing is | possible due to security policies and compliance and further | discussion requires meetings with people with long job titles. | And suddenly, deal breakers aren't that important anymore. And | sometimes you can even team up with the customers infosec | department this way in order to simplify things into a both more | secure and easier path. | | The best way we've found around this is to write white papers for | commonly asked questions and topics, like storage security. It's | great for our sales guys to be able to answer common questions | with a PDF with a bit of glamour, but with enough | incomprehensibility density to look important and to get | forwarded to infosec / CISOs. Yes I'm a bit jaded about the | process. | f0e4c2f7 wrote: | Writing the types of whitepapers you're describing is an art, | and not a holy one. | brightball wrote: | When I didn't realize this was how the process worked, I once | spent 2 weeks and about $5k meeting all of the requirements for | the RFP including the amount of formally printed copies of the | 200 page proposal had to be provided. | | Had delivered them. | | I was more than a little bothered afterwards because of the sheer | amount of time and money put in. They didn't even bother to give | us a courtesy call to let us know we weren't selected. | | In the end, they ended up hiring a company that was a friend of | the head of marketing who delivered something completely | different than what they'd asked for in the RFP. Frustrating all | around especially because of the number of people that were | involved in putting the whole thing together. | brightball wrote: | Apparently typing this on my phone was a bad idea. Apologies | for the multiple typos. | | _facepalm_ | MauranKilom wrote: | The article doesn't care to mention what RFP even means. So I'll | be the guy in the comments asking: "WTF does RFP stand for?" | toyg wrote: | https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/request-for-proposal.as... | | _" A request for proposal (RFP) is a business document that | announces a project, describes it, and solicits bids from | qualified contractors to complete it."_ | | Basically, it's a long laundry list of requirements for things | you want to buy (e.g. software), with some vague justification | attached. It's a thing in big companies and public | institutions, which are supposed to have a high degree of | oversight on any move they make. In practice, it's just another | source of Bullshit Jobs, since the company publishing an RFP | has likely already decided what they are going to buy and just | have to go through the motions - a bit like those companies | publishing job ads because they have to, when they already know | who they are going to hire. | bombcar wrote: | Request for proposal. Basically a list of requirements for | something, and then someone will reply to it with a quote. | rav wrote: | Apparently, "Request for proposal", which is a private-sector | equivalent of a tender process (speaking from my point of view | of doing a lot of consulting projects for the public sector). A | tender process usually requires the agency to pick the | quantitatively best bid (by some predetermined ranking scale, | usually price or some price-quality combination), whereas an | RFP has no such requirement and just lets the agency pick | whatever seems subjectively/qualitatively the best choice. | micheljansen wrote: | Ha, most companies have no clue about how to even get started | writing an RfP and are more than happy having a friendly vendor | do it for them. It's not necessarily a bad thing but a little | bias is almost impossible to avoid. | zerkten wrote: | You want to avoid RFPs except where you can exploit them. For | example, if you are able to get by with smaller customers for a | while, you can use the RFP process to gain access to stakeholders | and test out ideas. | | Procurement departments are often keen to encourage more | participation to help cover for the fact the decisions have been | made, but as long as you aren't taken in, then it's less of a | problem. In government and some industries, they may have | opportunities for smaller orgs through other entry points, but | the main RFP entry point can be easier to work out. | edko wrote: | Some companies even do this for job applications. A manager has a | person they want for a role but, because of policy, they must | publish it on their employment website, and go through the | charade of interviewing candidates, wasting everybody's time. In | the end, their preferred candidate wins. | dtjb wrote: | I don't think it's an exclusively bad practice, especially at | larger organizations where cliques and silos are deeply | entrenched. It can be hard to retain good people when every | opportunity is spoken for by the director's buddy and there's | no path to move up. | | I'm not arguing an absolute, there should be a way for leaders | to hand pick the clear favorite when they're qualified, but I | don't know if that should be the default policy. | rmason wrote: | This practice is fairly rampant at universities. It's just a | way they game the rules they're forced to operate under. | [deleted] | Fomite wrote: | Someone I know didn't get a job written for them because | someone with staggeringly high qualifications applied. It's | rare but it happens. | perfecthjrjth wrote: | This is needed for H1-B and PERM. | h1srf wrote: | Green card job postings do this because it is a requirement to | advertise the opening. So you tailor the job description | specifically for the person you already employ on a immigrant | visa. | nradov wrote: | You're probably referring to job postings used to justify | H-1B (and similar) visa applications. Such visas are only | supposed to be approved if the employer shows that no US | person can do the job. | | There's not really any green card job postings. But getting | an H-1B can be the first step toward obtaining a green card | (permanent residency) for some immigrants. | h1srf wrote: | Nope. Green card requires PERM which I think is a bit more | extensive than the H1B process. | commandlinefan wrote: | > tailor the job description | | And still don't hire anybody who shows up who actually has | those qualifications. | MegaButts wrote: | > Some companies | | I'm genuinely asking - are there companies that _don 't_ do | this? I guess excluding companies with something like <20 | people. | rootusrootus wrote: | We have done it at every company I've ever worked for, but | not for all positions. Probably less than half on average. | But it is somewhat common to find that someone we know and | like has become available and we open a position to offer it | to them. But HR makes us post it anyway, pro forma. | detaro wrote: | I don't know if it's universal at large companies, but your | cut-off is at least an order of magnitude to small. | throwawayboise wrote: | Yes. In fact, it's probably safe to assume it's happening | unless the position being advertised is entry-level or has | multiple openings for the same job description. | mulmen wrote: | Of course there are. If all companies only publish job | openings as a charade and know who they want to hire why go | through the charade? | Spooky23 wrote: | The H1 visa thing is one, although usually those jobs get | posted in obscure places and are purposefully written very | poorly. | | Another is if you want to justify using a contractor. | Sometimes you have to show problems attracting good | candidates before you can go that route. | MegaButts wrote: | You don't necessarily know who you want to hire when you | have a position. The question is if you already know who | you want to hire, do you always go through the charade? | notahacker wrote: | And the answer is "almost never, unless there are formal | requirements for the appearance of a hiring process, | which companies will tend not to put in place unless | legal/contractual/csr obligations around hiring force | them into doing or they really don't trust middle | managers' ability to promote". Even a charade of a hiring | process costs time and money (and much more so than an | RFP process) | | Even organisations like universities that have formal | requirements to advertise [certain positions] externally | will stick to doing the minimum allowable (which might be | a poorly written and overly demanding job spec put up on | the org's own careers page for the shortest allowable | time and any responses binned) if they've actually | already made the decision. | | Of course there's also a tendency of people to confuse | the charade with the more common case of a position being | genuinely open and contested and an internal or existing | relationship candidate applying (and sometimes but | definitely not always being favoured), especially if they | just missed out on a job after thinking their final | interview went well... | MegaButts wrote: | In my experience it's the opposite. I personally know | this has happened for probably over 100 positions, and | that's not based on rumors but something I witnessed. And | I saw that across a half dozen organizations ranging from | 100-10,000 employees. | | So "almost never" is almost certainly wrong. My sample | size is small, but it's big enough that when it happens | 100% of the time it suggests it's the norm. | | Your assumption that organizations are efficient might be | wrong. I'm basing my judgment on observation and you're | basing it on theory. | notahacker wrote: | You personally know of over 100 cases where the company | _didn 't_ have any sort of policy obliging it to | advertise jobs, but went through a full fake hiring | process with multiple candidates it was committed to not | hiring just for the fun of it?! | | (Your assumption that my understanding of hiring | processes is basely wholly on theory might be wrong) | [deleted] | [deleted] | jreese wrote: | Getting an H1B worker visa requires the hiring company to | advertise the open position and assert that no other | candidate met the required qualifications. | shkkmo wrote: | Either the company performs a real search with intent to | hire, or they are violating the law in a way they think | they won't be caught. | plorkyeran wrote: | Every sufficiently large company will have some job | postings which are charades, but that doesn't mean that | every job posting from a sufficiently large company is a | charade. | icecap12 wrote: | In my experience, this most frequently occurs if the company | does business with the government (fed, state, or local). In | such cases, the "charade" is required by Federal or State law. | I agree its absolutely ridiculous, but large companies can and | are in fact frequently audited on these and other hiring | practice requirements (such as interview notes, etc.). | | At my $BIGCORP, if you want to give somebody a band promotion | (meaning, up to the next major band), the job must be posted | both internally and externally and you must interview any | candidates who appear to meet the requirements. It's a pain in | the ass, especially when you clearly have someone in mind. | There are always people both internal and external looking at | our jobs site because we're a well known Fortune 50; you're | bound to get applicants to the higher level roles. It just | creates extra work and wastes the time of all involved...but | alas, regulation. | | eta: could also be a requirement of publicly traded companies, | though I'm far less sure on this. | umvi wrote: | This has happened twice to my dad. | | The first time was in 1994 when he applied for an Air Force | position in Italy. The role required a max 3 out of 3 score on | the DoD Italian proficiency test and some other niche | requirements, all of which my dad fulfilled. The Air Force | selected my dad for the position since the only other candidate | that applied was the person currently holding the position. | Then there was a big debacle because the commander over that | position actually wanted the extend the guy currently holding | the position a few years and decided crafting a niche job spec | that seemingly only he could fill was the best way. There was a | bunch of back-pedaling and politics and the job position was | redacted in order for the commander to keep his guy from being | replaced by my dad. | | The second time was similar, but at a public university. A | super niche job opening for their history department was | published on their site that required experience with american | military history, and a few other things my dad was uniquely | qualified for. He applied, and the job posting was shortly | taken down and my dad got a response like "actually we've | decided to move a different direction from when we originally | posted that job listing. That listing has been removed and we | are no longer accepting applications for it". Seemed like | another instance where the candidate to-be-hired was pre- | determined, but my dad threw a wrench into their plans by | applying to a job posting that was only supposed to have 1 | candidate (the predetermined hire). | brightball wrote: | I applied for a job that a friend of mine was up for simply | because they couldn't complete the job search until they had | enough candidates. I went through the interview process to | speed things up for him. Got interviewed by 9 people when we | all knew what the outcome was supposed to be. | | I spent most of the time talking about how great he was at his | job just to move it along faster. | danbmil99 wrote: | So you're saying, there's gambling in Casablanca? Who knew? (your | competitor did) | | I think there is a corollary to "If you don't know who the sucker | is -- it's you": | | "If you didn't have the inside track crafting the RFP to your | specs, you won't win the bid." | notyourday wrote: | We have an official answer of how we respond to RFPs - we send an | invoice for "RFP response" | | * $5,000/h | | * 10h minimum | | It is cathartic to hear the freak out on the other side. We also | say "No" to "Fill out this questionnaire" or "We need answers to | the following questions". You either have a product they want at | which point they will figure out how to ignore their rules to get | you, or you do not have a product that they want and you are | wasting your time doing "enterprise sales" | Overtonwindow wrote: | This happens a lot in government contracting... | p_l wrote: | F-35B happened essentially to ensure Lockheed-Martin won JSF | bid, as far as I know. | saynay wrote: | I see a lot of Franken-RFPs in government contracting. You get | sections that are just word-for-word recreations of a products | spec sheet, straight off their website. But different sections | are from different, competing, products. So the end RFP is | something that no one actually has, and then they are required | to award the project to whoever made the lowest bid. 5 years | later, when that project inevitably fails, they do it all over | again. | n_o_u wrote: | I've experienced this a number of times and it's mostly | frustrating. Recently though, we've had two customers come back | to us after their "preferred" vendor failed to execute. So even | if they have a competitor in mind, it's sometimes good to get in | front of them regardless. | rdtwo wrote: | Did you charge double the initial ask? | 988747 wrote: | Truth is, most of corporate directors have their favorite, | battle-tested vendors, but are still required, by corporate | policy, to go through some formal RFP process which they see as | annoyance. That's why they go through unofficial channels: my | company has been asked, on multiple occasions, to help write RFP | which we later responded to (and won, of course). | rootusrootus wrote: | So how to you get into B2B if the deck is stacked this hard | against smaller/newer companies? Hang out a shingle somewhere | with a sticker price and refuse to do any RFPs? Schmooze a lot | and hope to finally get on the other side of the RFP process? | djrogers wrote: | Having been through this several times, you usually start out | with a differentiated product, represented by boutique | resellers, and pitch/sell to early adopter types. After you've | gotten a little bit of runway under you, you can start | targeting a broader array of resellers and customers, and grow | from there. | sitkack wrote: | This is where OSS can really literally and metaphorically get | you in the door. But you will mostly also see occurrences of | the big consulting shops using the same software. So it cuts | both ways. | Spooky23 wrote: | You look for procurement lobbyists and partners like system | integrators and leverage those relationships. | | Also, you need to figure out if it's wise. Big companies or | government agencies will murder you with insurance and | compliance requirements before they give you a nickel. | lukasfischer wrote: | I had to smile while reading the post as I experienced this many | times. It's a shame. The question remains: How can this be | improved? Especially critically when public money is spent on | large scale multi million projects. As a citizen, I would like to | see a "fair" bidding process where the "best" supplier wins. | wodenokoto wrote: | Sitting on the other end, it can be super frustrating having to | go with the lowest bidder, which you very well know aren't up | to the task, but they managed to fill out the bid adequately at | the lowest price. | | From here on it's a battle to get the spirit of the bid and not | some useless interpretation of what you asked for. | | It's also a common tactic to seriously underbid and make up for | it by overcharging for changes. | SkyPuncher wrote: | Honestly, I don't think it can. Public perception cannot | tolerate failure/issues - even if there are huge efficiency | gains by not requiring _everything_ to be put through the | process. | Spooky23 wrote: | RFPs are only one tool in public procurement. Usually you go | the RFP route for a novel project that you don't want to | manage. | | I have too many years of experience in the space. The | successful projects are always owned by government managers | and RFP or RFQs off of centralized contracts (ie GSA) for | specific tasks or people. | | It is simple. If you can't manage the project, you probably | can't spec it either. And if you can spec it, only time to | market is a ideal reason to RFP. | detaro wrote: | Public RFPs are at least something you can sue over if your | competitor gets too brazen benefits. More transparency into | them for the general public would be nice, FOIA (or equivalent) | requests help a bitbut then often come to late to intervene, | just can bring it to light afterwards. | | > _As a citizen, I would like to see a "fair" bidding process | where the "best" supplier wins._ | | Defining what is "best" is of course the biggest challenge. In | many jurisdictions, it can deviate from "cheapest wins", but | then needs pre-defined criteria for evaluation, and any | judgement factor of course can go both ways - it can be used to | protect from a costly mistake and to give a benefit to a | inferior proposal. But such criteria can at least be used to | push it out from cheapest-wins, and make it easier to attack | the decision to attempt to compensate for bias. | | A big problem IMHO are follow-up RFPs where the initial one | didn't ensure their viability. E.g. once a company has won | "implement system X", all RFPs that require "integrate with | system X" or "maintain system X" are on one hand formally ok | because doing so is actually needed, but unfair because if | system X is sufficiently proprietary, the first company | obviously has a massive advantage. | jseliger wrote: | I do grant writing for nonprofits, public agencies, and some | research-based businesses, and this happens all the time with | public agencies: https://seliger.com/2009/12/27/why-seliger- | associates-never-... | ricksunny wrote: | 100%. (Also involved on the proposing / applying side of grant | writing here). | mgkimsal wrote: | I wrote the outline of what became an RFP for a university on | site tech training program. Someone else won. At the time, we | were about the only people doing this. Certainly the outline | referenced things that we'd developed training material for, and | we were early in this market. However another company 'won' | because they were local, and didn't have to factor in travel | costs (we had flights and multiple hotel rooms for a week | factored in). The university was 'bound' to go with the lower | bid, because they were claiming the 'same' material (which... | they couldn't have at the time). Internal trainees reached out | later and said it was pretty bad, to the point where they were | telling the instructor how to do stuff during the class. But... | they got the 'lowest' bid... | random3 wrote: | :) reminds me of my first company - I was still in college and we | bid for selling computers and printers to the national railways | company. | | I negotiated for weeks with IBM and HP. | | We made our proposal (sealed envelope type). | | We won. | | One week later HP faxed the railway company that they retracted | our "warranty authorization" (or something like that). | | We got disqualified. | | Another blessed HP partner was supposed to win and HP solved the | issue. | | I shut off the company and graduated CS. | indymike wrote: | I used to have a rule for my sales team: | | Never respond to an RFP you did not write. | | Most naive salespeople would complain about it and point out how | ethics rules prevented vendors from writing RFPs. I'd then point | out the similarities in the RFP to the competitors product | descriptions on their websites and documentation. | mindtricks wrote: | I'm not sure I 100% agree with the rule, but sales teams should | definitely consider it deeply. | | It's worth the money for a sales team that understands this | process. If your team isn't influencing the RFP, that means | they have no real relationship with the client and relevant | stakeholders. You'll likely just pull in cost-conscious or | high-maintenance clients. | _jal wrote: | When we were starting a consulting company back when, we fell for | this once. | | As the article states, once you're aware that this happens, it | usually isn't hard to spot the signs. After that, if we suspected | we were being suckered for someone else's process checkbox, we'd | offer to write a response at our normal hourly rate, and actually | got a taker once. | | But in general, this stuff will bleed you dry when you're | starting out, be careful. | dagw wrote: | Just because you wrote it, doesn't mean you'll always win it. | I've been involved in cases where we had pretty much designed and | sold in the project and basically wrote the RFP and then some | other company came along offered to do it at a significantly | lower price. | Kalanos wrote: | It typically requires a lot of time from your best ppl to respond | to RFPs | asyncscrum wrote: | This is 100% true. The bigger the deal value, the less | delegation there is. Often times, if it's like a top 10 | account, the CEO shows up and is heavily involved in the | presentation layer. | commandlinefan wrote: | > We need to integrate with Qlik!! We need a data warehouse! We | need to restrict access to the app to certain IP ranges! | | But the time range and price quote never changes... | hpcjoe wrote: | Back when I had my own HPC company, we often consulted on RFP | specs for customers building clusters. After a while we started | building our own clusters. A well known large/prestigious | university on the East Coast US called us to help with the RFP, | and bid. We did. | | We found out later that they simply wanted help with the RFP. | They never took our bid seriously. Small company with a great | rep, they preferred dealing with the large companies with meh | reps. | | Another one ... a university somewhere here in Michigan, an alma | mater of mine in fact, did something akin to this, but used | another vendor as its stalking horse. We constructed our bid | aggressively, and submitted. | | Later that month, while on vacation with the family in Florida, | the purchasing agent called me up. She wanted me to teach the | other companies how to do what we did (much higher density, far | better performance, etc.) I asked why. She said they liked our | solution. They just didn't want to buy from us. | | We'd won the RFP. But lost the business. | | Of course, we declined teaching our competitors. They (the | university) were unhappy with that, and didn't understand why we | wouldn't do this for them. | | I was then, and still am somewhat, blown away by the complete | lack of understanding of how businesses actually work, on the | part of the RFP folks, the purchasing agents, etc. | | Another time, I had a university call us up asking for a bid for | something. I asked if they had a preferred vendor (all do). She | said yes, but state law said they need at least 3 bids before | they can purchase. I asked if our bid would be taken seriously. | She said no. | | Yeah. I've shared some of these anecdotes with others in this | industry, and we all nod our heads. All of us have run into this | before. Some of the stories are far more outrageous than mine. | | An interesting tangent: I currently work for a company whose RFP | we won ~14 years ago for storage, but was rejected by the person | who was my first boss here, as we (the company back then) were | too small. That's happened multiple times throughout my career. | Even though our solution was demonstrably superior in all | technical and financial aspects, we "lost". | | Can be disheartening. | bombcar wrote: | The most understandable of all those is the "too small" - once | you've been in the business long enough you realize that small | companies can disappear quite quickly. Large ones can too, but | it's much less common (and if they do go down, you can point to | everyone else taken down with them). | | The workaround is to sell your stuff _through_ a larger company | that 's complementary. | toyg wrote: | On the other hand, if you are a midsize or large business, | with minimal effort you can effectively own a vendor that | will act as an unofficial extra department. You give them | enough business to become their biggest customer and they are | effectively hooked for life, because who's ever going to drop | a client providing 40-50% of their total revenue? | ineedasername wrote: | _> too small_ | | I'm sorry to tell you, but I am one of those people who | frequently argue against a small less established vendor, at | least for anything really important. | | Why? I've been burned a few times. New (< 5 years) small | companies can disappear overnight. If they don't simply | disappear and have a bit of revenue then they often get | acquired by one of the big players. Those players either: | | 1) don't know how to properly manage this new product and it | stagnates, the 75% of account managers are fired and support | goes to shit. Or: | | 2) the company has no intention of keeping the product, and | despite initial assurances to the contrary a year goes by and I | get a notice that they're shifting all customers of the | acquired product to their own competing version. Sometimes this | comes with a very sneaky hard sell to re-up on a long term | contract before the announce the product EOL. | throwawayboise wrote: | > University | | Universities are almost a separate reality. Unless you happen | to be dealing with someone who has prior experience in the | private sector, they will have no idea how businesses operate | or how money is earned. It's typical to be dealing with someone | who has been doing the same job for 20 years and never worked | anywhere else. | inopinatus wrote: | This is common in healthcare, too. Both sectors then suffer | from decision makers being senior academic/medical staff who | think very highly of themselves but actually lack any | managerial acumen, offering a sterling demonstration of the | Peter Principle in action. | bgroat wrote: | My brother is an academic and has roughly zero understanding | of real world operations. | | Which isn't too surprising. | | He's exclusively been in classrooms since he was 4 years old. | drc500free wrote: | With government contracting, your competitor didn't just write | the RFP, they wrote the budget line item that congress approved. | You needed to be there 4 years ago when appropriation started. | bell-cot wrote: | Flip-side, an honest & competent purchaser can use "cooked" RFP's | to try to weed out incompetent, indifferently-honest, cost- | overrun-prone, etc. would-be suppliers, when they're forced to | follow a "publish RFP and take bids" rulebook. | asyncscrum wrote: | Yes this is also an additional gotcha that makes this process | an even deeper quagmire. | stormcode wrote: | I worked at a digital agency for years. This is the most true | thing I've read in ages. Every single point struck a nerve with | me. I honestly wish I'd read and believed this before starting my | job there. It would have saved me endless hours of stress and | pushing back with my leadership about technical requirements that | went nowhere. | Shank wrote: | > In the case of RFPs, think of it like you're buying a logo. You | want this nice logo on your website, in case studies, in press | releases and in CEO powerpoint decks. What is this logo worth to | you? | | This is actually the opposite of true for big companies. Some | companies let you use their logo, but most enterprise agreements | will prohibit this explicitly. If you see a logo on a website, | unless it's associated with a formal case study or testimonial, | it's probably just an indicator that one person on the domain | signed up at one point. If the logo later is removed and replaced | with a different company, it's usually because they've signed a | contract or been C&D'd and can't show it anymore. | arrakis2021 wrote: | Having read and filled out dozens of RFPs I can confirm almost | all of them read like this. this is spot on. | duxup wrote: | > Must-have requirements that will never ever be used by anyone | | Heck sometimes the folks who created the requirement forget they | were the one who created the requirement, and certainly forgot | why... | | Or my favorite they requested it, forgot it was their request, | and they make a big stink about why it is there. | | I got that one this week. Fortunately no real consequences aside | from me shaking my head with my camera off / off camera. | | In my experience these situations are as much a company exploring | "what do we even do here?" as much as looking at software or | services. | atldev wrote: | So true. I once received an RFP template where our competitor had | forgotten to clear their company (and even author) from the | document details. I was glad because it helped us avoid a | complete waste of time. | jjkaczor wrote: | So - over the past three years, I had an extremely part-time | regional government client who I worked with maybe 40-60hrs per | year through a friend's boutique consultancy, mostly as a | favor. | | Last spring, I prepared a migration roadmap, including some | initial estimates. | | Apparently, when they sent out their RFP, they included my name | and the majority of my roadmap. My current client (a large, | multi-national consultancy) was reviewing to bid - and someone | recognized my name and reached out to me internally. We all had | a laugh when I explained how tiny the actual project would be - | heck, my friend didn't even respond to the RFP as it would be | too much headache and not within his niche focus area. | | (Overall - this article is very accurate in my experience, I | have been on both sides of the process, and typically it is a | complete waste of time, resources and energy) | ineedasername wrote: | > _These may or may not be actually important requirements for | this prospect to be successful_ | | This is why most people who've been around even a little while | grow to hate sales reps and the sales process in general, | especially those large enough for an RFP. | | This clearly shows a demonstrable tendency towards the mercenary | "close the deal no matter what" that is so pervasive. And it is | usually very short sighted as well, because this is how you | acquire customers that grow to hate you, bad mouth you whenever | the opportunity arises, and switches to a competitor when | possible, having learned enough about that product ecosystem to | hopefully cut through the bullshit the next time around. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-06 23:00 UTC)