[HN Gopher] Show HN: Redditle.com - For those of us who add 'Red... ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: Redditle.com - For those of us who add 'Reddit' to every Google search Author : greentfrapp Score : 280 points Date : 2022-04-07 16:33 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (redditle.com) (TXT) w3m dump (redditle.com) | TimLeland wrote: | Funny I built the same thing a couple weeks ago: | | https://gooreddit.com/ | greentfrapp wrote: | Oh nice high five! Plus that's the smart way to do it like | oh_sigh mentioned in their comment too | TimLeland wrote: | Haha thanks! I took the simple route that saves a few | keystrokes. | ComradePhil wrote: | This needs an "amp" feature so you never have to go to the reddit | website/app. | greentfrapp wrote: | Hold on what's that? It sounds really cool but I've never heard | of it. | jkingsman wrote: | AMP[1] is a (somewhat maligned) Google 'standard' which | encourages a 'thin' version of sites with minimal assets and | fast load times so that Google can display them in a sort of | iframe-like context without the user actually having to leave | the Google site (part of why it's maligned). Most site's AMP | versions are lightweight and bypass any login/paywall because | they want Google to show the rich results of this page. I'm | guessing this person is interested in you using the AMP | versions of Reddit which may be lighter, zippier, and not | require login. I'm not sure if it's possible for a third | party to display an AMP page the way Google does, though -- | maybe -\\_(tsu)_/- | | [1]: https://developers.google.com/amp | greentfrapp wrote: | Ahhh interesting - thanks so much for the explanation! | PUSH_AX wrote: | The amp version of reddit is horrific. | tomatowurst wrote: | neat idea but appending reddit at end of a search in address bar | isn't exactly a huge deal enough for me to use an entire search | engine altogether | throwitawayfam wrote: | The killer feature for me would be time filter. Google doesn't | work because the dates listed on the results never match the date | of the original post. For example, something posted 7 years ago | will be marked as posted recently on Google. I assume this is | some SEO bullshit that Reddit is pulling. | | I've posted about this a lot as I use site:reddit.com | extensively. | [deleted] | oars wrote: | This is the only reason I sometimes use Reddit's search over | Google. | | If this problem was solved then it's game over. | weare138 wrote: | >For example, something posted 7 years ago will be marked as | posted recently on Google. | | I've noticed this too. I think Google Search is updating the | page's timestamp in the search cache every time anything | changes on the page itself. So if the sub's admins change any | content that displays on every page in the sub, like the | rules/guidelines section or stickies a post for example, Google | Search is considering it a page update even if the post itself | is old. | jfengel wrote: | I don't use Reddit, and haven't found it terribly interesting. | Why would somebody want to use it as a primary source of truth? | | Wikipedia? Sure. StackOverflow? Sometimes. | | I occasionally prefer Quora links, only because I'm active there | and there's a chance I'll know the person (and thus have some | faith in their answer). Is it something like that? | | What is it about Reddit that I'm missing? | xboxnolifes wrote: | > Why would somebody want to use it as a primary source of | truth? | | Not everything is about truth or untruth. Some things are | opinions, and some opinions are worse than others. Some are | just spam. | | Search engines have been absolutely destroyed by blog spam. | Look up info on new hardware? Dozens of amazon referral blog | spam. Look up information about hobbies? Dozens of blog spam | trying to either sell you something or get ad revenue. Look up | an obscure thought about something civil in nature? A mix | between thousand page government docs that I don't know how to | navigate, a few dozen irrelevant "news" articles, and more blog | spam. | | At least with reddit I can usually find something that is not | blog spam, and I'm generally familiar with the biases of | various subs. It's far from perfect, but I don't know anything | better in the general case. | casperc wrote: | For me it is good to find an honest discussion of a thing (e.g. | tool, tv series) rather than whatever paid-for article or | review which would otherwise appear first. | Zebfross wrote: | It can be the most reliable place to find a group of real | people all knowledgeable about the same thing. So things like | "best weekend itinerary in x city". | Sherl wrote: | Straight up Google results are too manipulated by machine | generated blogs for SEO. Google "best x" you would end up in a | blog post made of Amazon affiliate links. Same goes for product | reviews, it's impossible to find blogs that cover reviews on | everyday products barring a few. Reddit has become a gold mine | for some when it comes to product reviews and research. "Give a | man a mask, he will tell you the truth" - with quora your | identity being associated some hesitate on stark opinions but | with reddit, you can do whatever you want to say and the | community takes care of it with upvotes and karma. | | Recently there has been an influx of paid reviews and opinions | everywhere, yt comments, Amazon reviews and even reddit | comments. So take everything with a truckload of salt but given | the limited content I have to source, reddit is as good as it | gets. Someone should build yt comments extractor and search on | top of that. | gundamdoubleO wrote: | I use it to get a more informed idea of products I'm thinking | about buying. For example if I'm looking up a specific pair of | headphones I'll usually read around on there to see what people | think of them. | batrat wrote: | This. Yesterday I was looking for a pc case and google showed | only irrelevant results for x vs y. Typing reddit, bam | instant discussions about the topic even with more useful | information. | | Op thx for the tool it is on my homepage now. | rabuse wrote: | I use it all the time for discovering new movies and similar | movies to those I like | Slix wrote: | If I search for a Windows problem on Google, I'll get tons of | long generic content that contains very basic advice and lots | of steps. They look like hastily-written tech sites with lots | of ads that try to win with SEO. | | If I search with `site:reddit.com`, I get actual users | discussing their problem and what solutions they've tried. | maerF0x0 wrote: | This, but for so much more than just tech. For example try to | find a discussion of Trader Joes vs Whole Foods. | cush wrote: | For now, it provides the most honest feedback with less spam. | For now. | HellsMaddy wrote: | It's a result of the avalanche of SEO crap results that you | normally get in Google searches. Wikipedia and StackOverflow | are good too, but don't always have the information you're | looking for. My top 4 resources are GitHub, Wikipedia, Reddit, | and StackOverflow. | | Reddit is a catch-all for communities nowadays, where you can | generally find authentic questions and answers to most common | problems and discussions about most common topics. | | Personally I trust (some parts of) Reddit far more than Quora, | where the content seems to be largely SEO/marketing crap and | not authentic. | | Reddit does have the same SEO/marketing crap content, to be | sure, but it has a lot of authentic content too, and I find | it's generally easy to tell what is what. | | I guess for me it boils down to authenticity being more | important than authority or expertise, because one of the | largest problems with the web today is inauthentic content, | content where the author has an ulterior motive. | parentheses wrote: | It would be nice if this supported <insert search engine> AND the | ability to choose. | abdussamit wrote: | Internal Server Error! | simlevesque wrote: | I've noticed an increased amount of search hijacking related to | "reddit" these days. The results are flooded with results such as | these when I search for "axiom trekk reddit": | | - https://redditfavorites.com/products/axiom-trekk-seat-collar... | | - https://redditbests.com/reviews/axiom-gear-trekk-rack/ | | - https://www.petagadget.com/a/axiom-trekk-seat-clamp-collar-f... | | Your website should help me with that ! | arsome wrote: | If you're using it for product research, probably not the best | idea - I'm betting that people who append site:reddit.com to | their queries are not the only ones who've noticed it being a | better place to find information sometimes... marketers will, | if not, already have, heavily infiltrated popular subreddits, | especially to manufacture consensus on good products. | silicon2401 wrote: | that's easily fixed by googling "blah blah site:reddit.com" | | The real problem is how to get better results now that reddit's | site has changed. I often see posts from even 10 years show as | having activity from within a few years or even days on google. | The reddit redesign has been a horrible detriment to the | website | jawmes9 wrote: | Most searches I do now are search + {nameOfForum} | | Especially looking into new libraries or programming languages, I | always append "hackernews" to my search | Bo0kerDeWitt wrote: | Hmm, if I search "nordic curls" I get "No results found". If I | Google "nordic curls reddit" the first hit is an incredibly | useful reddit post. | | Edit: That's weird, it seems to be working now. | greentfrapp wrote: | oof could you try that again? I just increased the capacity of | the lambda - it was previously timing out from too many | requests. | Bo0kerDeWitt wrote: | Yup, working! Looks cool. | greentfrapp wrote: | Thanks! Also, just wanted to say I love Bioshock Infinite | too. But more the Lutece twins than DeWitt | trinovantes wrote: | Protip for Firefox users: you can create your own custom search | engines for any website by simply creating a new bookmark of the | form "https://www.google.com/search?q=%s+site:reddit.com" and set | the bookmark keyword to whatever prefix you prefer e.g. "r". This | config will let me search reddit by typing "r vuejs" my Firefox's | address bar | layer8 wrote: | On mobile I use global (OS-level) text abbreviations to auto- | convert "sr" to "site:reddit.com". | joshuamarksmith wrote: | Works in Chrome too. | | I use the shortcut "rs" for | https://www.google.com/search?q=%s+site:reddit.com for | searching reddit, and the shortcut "r" to go directly to the | subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/%s | ayush000 wrote: | How exactly did you do that? | prepostertron wrote: | Should be under Chrome Settings -> Search engine -> Manage | search engines and site search -> Site search. | | You can add your custom search with the %s placeholder, a | shortcut to use in the address bar, and name. | halfjoking wrote: | Also available in Edge. I had to add Brave Search | manually to set it as the default search. | greentfrapp wrote: | TIL! +100 | 3OCSzk wrote: | Adding to the protip: there is https://mycroftproject.com that | is full of premade custom search engines to save you the hassle | of making them manually | jackallis wrote: | can you expand that further how to for the non-initiated. | trinovantes wrote: | I posted some screenshots on my website | https://www.stephenli.ca/blocking-spam-websites-from- | google-... | | Basically Firefox substitutes the text of your query into the | %s part of the bookmark URL | Beta-7 wrote: | This is amazing. I've been using DDG mostly for the bangs and | really wished there was a way to add custom bangs (I suggested | them to DDG, but never got a response). This is just what i | needed. | kzrdude wrote: | Great that you got to know it. "Mozilla keywords" is an age- | old feature, probably from before firefox existed. | modernerd wrote: | You can submit your own for consideration if you have a | custom one in mind that might be helpful to others: | | https://duckduckgo.com/newbang | Beta-7 wrote: | That's what i meant by suggesting a bang. The bang was the | equivalent of `!dictionary`, but in my native language. I | guess not enough people here use DDG for it to be | considered. | phrz wrote: | xSearch for Safari is great for this on Mac and iOS. I've made | a bunch of custom !bang search engines on top of those | supported by DuckDuckGo. It really speeds up research on | various databases. | cwillu wrote: | You can do the same on chrome: right click on the url bar - | manage search engines - set a keyword to the prefix you prefer | and the url with %s for the search term in the same way. | [deleted] | layer8 wrote: | This isn't really relevant anymore, but even Internet Explorer | had that feature ("SearchUrl") since IE3 in 1996. While not | well-known, it's a must-have browser feature IMO. | sedatk wrote: | Doesn't work with Edge :( | sccxy wrote: | Settings - "Manage search engines" - Add new one | | Works very well with any site. | sedatk wrote: | Awesome, I didn't know search engine settings had "keyword" | feature. Thanks! | nvrspyx wrote: | For DuckDuckGo users, you can just use a !bang. !r for | searching on Reddit directly, !sr to go to a specific | subreddit, !searchr for searching Reddit through DDG, and | !greddit for searching Reddit through Google. | | To see other Reddit options, !bangs Reddit. | | https://duckduckgo.com/bang | InCityDreams wrote: | https://duckduckgo.com/?kl=wt- | wt&kp=-2&kn=1&kaj=m&kay=b&kv=m... | | ...my default/ basic DDG search. I ublock all the graphics | and stuff, too. | xigoi wrote: | What do the parameters do? | NAHWheatCracker wrote: | It's too bad they have !r go the the Reddit search page, | which is famously bad. | | I didn't know about !searchr, wish it was shorter. At least | it's better than what I've been doing which is typing out | site:reddit.com. | boomboomsubban wrote: | From further down this post, !ddgr works too. | holoduke wrote: | I add 'forum' to my question. I don't think Reddit is a good site | to answer my questions. Lot more specialized forums with more in | depth info. The only topic I use reddit for is politics. | Pxtl wrote: | At this point the granularity of subreddits often make Reddit | the main forum of note on many subjects. | TruthWillHurt wrote: | I don't add "reddit" because Reddit discussions are good, | | I add it because Google results are shit. | maerF0x0 wrote: | Killer feature for me would be to kill the use app nag on mobile. | seabrookmx wrote: | You can do this in the settings. Top right hamburger menu > | Settings > Uncheck "Ask to open in app." | | I stumbled upon this when looking for the dark mode toggle and | was very happy. | ehsankia wrote: | Here I thought it was another Wordle game, not a good time to | name your product <name>le | cwillu wrote: | "Introducing the newest wordle clone: google! Try to guess the | correct search terms to find your target in under 5 searches!" | yalogin wrote: | Nice! In many instances for me searching through subreddits is | the only way to go. Did not realize a lot of us do it. Not sure | it warrants a new domain though. | abhinavsharma wrote: | I built a desktop browser extension version (100% open source and | GPL licensed) of this basic idea or side searching filtered to | some sites only. It also just uses your browser's default search | engine (so you can stick to DuckDuckGo for example). Usually I | don't like to plug on HN but thought this is uniquely relevant. | | It shows reddit (also HN, and others when relevant) filtered | results in a sidebar for Google queries. It's auto expanded when | there's a non-navigational query with no onebox (this is a | increasingly becoming a good indicator of when Google is lacking | decisiveness in a query). | | Example: https://share.getcloudapp.com/QwuLL0NW For Chrome or | Edge: | http://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hypersearch/feojage... | For Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en- | US/firefox/addon/hypersearch-d... Source: | https://github.com/abhinavsharma/hypersearch | | Feedback or change requests are appreciated via Github! | abhinavsharma wrote: | adding a direct link to the screenshot since it hit the limit | https://p42.f3.n0.cdn.getcloudapp.com/items/QwuLL0NW/aa3989b... | ARandomerDude wrote: | I get a blank screen with a 500 and some JS errors every time. | POST https://4781toi2w8.execute-api.us- | east-1.amazonaws.com/default/redditle-search 500 | Error: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading | 'match') at index.0dca874d.js:5:25633 | TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'length') | at Proxy.Yu (index.0dca874d.js:5:28261) | greentfrapp wrote: | Oh no I think my lambda is dying - I didn't expect this to blow | up LOL let me fix that! | runjake wrote: | Alternatively, just add keyword searches to your browser. | | Here's how to do it with Firefox: https://kb.iu.edu/d/arjb | | In Chrome, you do pretty much the same in Settings->Search | Engine->Manage Search Engines->Add | | You'll want to use something like this, to taste: | https://www.google.com/search?q=%s+site:reddit.com | | I have these set up for all kinds of sites, and they're | accessible straight from my local machines (because: sync) | | More help for Google search operators: | https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2466433?hl=en | kyleee wrote: | or directly to your operating system if using KDE | martini333 wrote: | imagine | epa wrote: | Google's search result quality has been abysmal for years now, | cheers for this. | oraoraoraoraora wrote: | Reddle ftfy | propter_hoc wrote: | Google used to have a feature called Discussions Search that | would search forums for results. That allowed you to get | discussion results from any forum. Since Google killed it, it's | impossible to get discussion results unless you focus on Reddit. | | I wonder how much this has contributed to Reddit crowding out | other discussion forums. | ConSeannery wrote: | I tend to append or prepend site:forum.* to my searches to | emulate this missing feature. Not every forum is set up with | this url but it's better than nothing | greentfrapp wrote: | Thanks everyone for the HN hug of death on this little side | project of mine! It's been crazyyyy. And if it's okay I also just | wanted to give a small shout out to my other project at | https://catche.co - we've got about 30 people on that waitlist, | check it out! | user- wrote: | I think you might want to make the 'Learn More' stand out | against the white background. I didn't see it at all and almost | closed the tab until I noticed it. | nofinator wrote: | FYI, there are some DuckDuckGo bangs (shortcuts) for this too. | For example, if you wanted to search for Hacker News, try: | !searchr Hacker News OR !ddgr Hacker News | ipunchghosts wrote: | I have been doing this for months. Didnt know other people did | this! | lettergram wrote: | Funny I used to have something called redditprofile.com that did | something similar. Let you view trends as well, etc. | | It's now called insideropinion.com sell to companies. | | I think there's a lot of interesting stuff to get out of Reddit. | leeoniya wrote: | please add option to use the old.reddit.com domain. the new | Reddit frontend is an unmitigated disaster. | notsahil wrote: | You can use: https://addons.mozilla.org/en- | US/firefox/addon/old-reddit-re... or | https://libredirect.github.io if you want Libreddit | nicklaf wrote: | And in general: https://addons.mozilla.org/en- | US/firefox/addon/redirector/ | | My rule for reddit: reddit: www -> old | Redirect: https://www.reddit.com/* to: | https://old.reddit.com/$1 | unpixer wrote: | +1 for Redirector. | | Also useful, for example, if you want to be the one in | charge of whether your browser uses the desktop version of | Wikipedia rather than the mobile one: | https://en.m.wikipedia.org -> https://en.wikipedia.org | Redirect: https://en.m.wikipedia.org(\/.\\*)? to: | https://en.wikipedia.org$1 | greatpostman wrote: | Years after using the new UI, I still think this. | varenc wrote: | If you have a Reddit account no extensions are needed to fix | this. | | Just go to your Reddit account settings[0] and click "Opt out | of the redesign" at the bottom. (Or on old Reddit you uncheck | "Use new Reddit as my default experience"). Once you do this | you'll now see old Reddit on www.reddit.com. | | [0] https://www.reddit.com/settings | boomboomsubban wrote: | I have done this, yet your link takes me to the new reddit. | It's incredibly annoying. | zerocrates wrote: | I will note that this setting occasionally "unsticks" and you | start getting the new one again... I assume that's a | purposeful "feature" to see if they can cleave off some | people who now tolerate it or don't notice. | zamadatix wrote: | The best thing about this is other people don't need | "old.reddit.com" to "new.reddit.com" redirector extensions. | Reddit assumes if you put "old." or "new." then you | explicitly want to override your account's preferences. | Kiro wrote: | What's wrong with new reddit? old.reddit is practically | unusable on mobile devices. i.reddit is better but I still | prefer new reddit. | zerocrates wrote: | Mostly my problem with it is that it's buggy: frequently | clicking a thread or comment chain doesn't actually load, but | scrolls the screen as if it did, and other similar | annoyances. | | On mobile particularly if logged out (or _particularly_ | particularly if in a private browsing mode) it 's quite | aggressive about trying to push you to the app, or letting | you view only a couple comments in a thread before saying | you're not allowed to see more, or not letting you view some | subs at all. "Old" reddit doesn't do any of this. | easrng wrote: | New reddit is also a shitshow on mobile. Load the page (which | takes a while) dismiss the prompt to get the app, continue | browsing, click Load More in comments, try to dismiss the | login prompt, fail, give up and leave. On desktop new reddit | scrolls all the way to the top when you Ctrl+click links in | comment threads, it's a mess. I usually use libreddit. | supperrtadderr wrote: | Since 2013 or so, the mobile experience and then the new | refresh is so bad. | tmpz22 wrote: | On new Reddit I get infinite loading on mobile, which forces me | to type in old. | | It's frustrating that there are clear regressions on mobile | even for a mobile centric overhaul. | imglorp wrote: | You might also like https://i.reddit.com/ for pure, fast, | HTML experience. Until they yank it. Sshh! | jmckib wrote: | Don't even bother with reddit on mobile; you really need an | app. I've been through a lot of reddit apps and Boost is the | best IMO. Everything just works, and useful gestures that I | _usually_ don 't trigger by accident. | squeaky-clean wrote: | On some posts on mobile I get an overlay telling me to either | create an account, or view r/popular, with no choice to view | the post I found via search. If you do sign in you get 2, | sometimes 3 consecutive popups to use their app. They | definitely don't care about the mobile web experience except | as a means to market their app | nfadili wrote: | This is a fun idea, and works exactly as described! I really like | how the styling feels like google search too. | mattwad wrote: | I notice not all results have a date. That is extremely important | when looking at Reddit posts, and one of the main issues with | Google because old posts will show up as new. | yewenjie wrote: | I just use a custom regex with the Redirector extension for | searching in any subreddit. | | https://github.com/einaregilsson/Redirector | mfrye0 wrote: | Seems that you're getting the HN hug of death right now. The site | is unusable. | notsahil wrote: | I get blank page with https://redditle.com/search?q=linux | slig wrote: | Congrats! Hope to try it as soon as it comes back. | | Also, I'm pretty surprised that Google doesn't block AWS from | doing automated queries. | paulpauper wrote: | The problem, is that Google often serves up old reddit threads as | new due to some bug in "search by date" feature. You end up with | 10-year-old reddit threads showing up having a date from 7 days | ago. | ehPReth wrote: | Is it a bug with Google or is it Reddit trying to growth hack | again? They have been shady especially with mobile | k8sToGo wrote: | It says it is overwhelmed for me. | ehsankia wrote: | HN hug of death. | tetraca wrote: | So, how long until marketers also completely ruin this avenue to | get real opinions about things? | sebmellen wrote: | We can't let them discover it. | bee_rider wrote: | Well, there are definitely shill accounts on reddit, but not | enough to ruin the site. And the whole point of the site is to | argue with people, so I guess it should be possible to, at | least sometimes, tell if something is up. | | Based on | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30946792#30948119 | | I guess some folks are working on ruining the idea of | specifically searching for Reddit, but their efforts are pretty | transparent at this point. | zander312 wrote: | hug of death for me | cush wrote: | Are we using the "le" suffix for non-Wordle apps now? Reminds me | of the "ly" suffix from the early 2010s. Hey, it certainly worked | out for Musical.ly | FalcorTheDog wrote: | I suspect you're overthinking it. I'm pretty sure he just took | the "le" from Google (Reddit + Google = Redditle). | oh_sigh wrote: | Assuming this is just for fun and not an attempt at an actual | business, why not just forward the user to | www.google.com/search?q=my_query after appending | "+site:Reddit.com" or whatever? This could be done with a | statically served 1kb HTML file with no server otherwise required | to handle requests. | greentfrapp wrote: | Ahh this is actually a really really good point - I just pulled | this out of my butt today as a fun coding project haha but what | you described would be a much smarter way to do it. Less fun | though! Oh well I'll just leave this up, I'm guessing the | traffic will probably die down after awhile. | [deleted] | vmoore wrote: | Hackernews' Algolia search function is also a wealth of | information. Basically any useful site (& comment) you can | imagine is stored there, if you care to look. It's almost too | good to be true, but you have to be in a serendipitous mindset to | dive into certain topics, and also have something precious to us | all: time. There's rabbit-holes on certain topics where I | genuinely don't have the time to delve any further. | | Like lately I wanted to learn about Go and was just floored at | how much documentation and snippets of code I could use in my | first project, so I just gave up. There are things I _want_ to | learn, but don 't have the dedication & discipline to set aside 5 | hours to make those initial first steps. | | This is why I double down on topics I am _currently_ proficient | at, and when I find something that can go exponential the more | time I spend on it, the better it is for me. Build on strength. | Lamad123 wrote: | Going with some kind of browser extension would've been better!! | jarrenae wrote: | Looks great! sorry to see that the API isn't quite working with | all the traffic though. | | I actually build the same thing a few weeks back: | https://searchbettr.com but it redirects instantly to a Google | search so you don't have to deal with the API. | toomuchtodo wrote: | Feature request: subreddit autocomplete at the beginning of a | query. | guanzo wrote: | Hah, you got me. Reddit content is efficient to browse (old | reddit UI), has multiple POVs, and upvotes is a decent heuristic | for determining answer quality. | | Random websites on the other hand... If i'm looking for a recipe, | why do I have to read several paragraphs about what you did last | Tuesday? Anecdotal preambles are the worst. | amar-laksh wrote: | Obligatory Reddit scroller comment: https://scrolller.com/ (The | best photo aggregator for reddit) | k8sToGo wrote: | Addicting infinite scrolling ahead. Trying to avoid these | things. But I like the UX | neurotrace wrote: | I've gotten so used to seeing variants of Wordle that I read | "Redditle" and immediately thought it was some sort of Reddit- | based Wordle | greentfrapp wrote: | Yeah I know! I wanted to go for geddit.com which would have | been perfect but it was taken. | copperx wrote: | I thought it was a product by Readdle, which coincidentally has | similar branding colors. | greentfrapp wrote: | Hi HN! I built redditle.com for those of us who append "reddit" | to our Google searches. | | Reddit search isn't great (https://old.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuest | ions/comments/lucx82/w...). But it's improving! | (https://old.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/t9nuaz/whats_up_wit...) | | In the meantime, some of us still use Google to search Reddit, | hence https://redditle.com | | Or for some of us, because Google's results are increasingly | filled with clickbait, "reddit" has been a cheatcode to navigate | that. Redditle is for you too! | | Is it the same as Googling "site:reddit.com"? Yes :D | | Redditle also supports searching in a specific subreddit with | "r/<subreddit>" e.g. "r/webdev guide to vue" would search in | r/webdev. | | GitHub repo - https://github.com/greentfrapp/redditle | lucasyvas wrote: | Just want to say that I love this - I'm the exact target for | it! I had considered doing something similar as a TUI, but my | lazy ass never got around to it :) | plq wrote: | This looks nice, congrats on shipping :) | | Did you know that "Redditle" literally means either "with | Reddit" or "Reddit it" in Turkish depending on context and is | actually the perfect Turkish name for a service that does | something using Reddit? | | As a similar example, Turkish for "Google it" is "Google'la". | To google is "Google'lamak". | | PS: The suffixes le/la are the same, vowels in suffixes | generally adapt to the word that the get attached to due to | vowel harmony. | Lammy wrote: | My first assumption was that it's a reference to the | obsession with "le" in rage comics on Reddit like a decade | ago: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/le | tempestn wrote: | Pretty sure the 'le' is from the end of 'Google'. It's | Google, but just for Reddit--Redditle. I like the Turkish | coincidence though! | abhinavsharma wrote: | This is great! let me know if you'd like to integrate this as | the reddit option in our desktop extension. | | https://github.com/abhinavsharma/hypersearch | tehwebguy wrote: | One of my favorite tweets brought to life: | | > u can google ur questions about the world and get the CIA FBI | answer or u can add "reddit" to the end of it and learn the | truth | vasilakisfil wrote: | nice! I use that quite often, so it might come handy. Quick | question, how did you build that ? Does Google provide any sort | of API or did you build a web scraper for that ? | binwiederhier wrote: | Congratulations to you for the release. It looks great. For | most of the queries I get that the server is overwhelmed. | Probably HN hug of death. | | I would look into the Reddit trademark situation. I am pretty | sure reddit only allows apps and websites to use "for Reddit" | and no other name combinations with their name. | loceng wrote: | Top threads in Reddit are often contrived too: comments and | recommendations mimicking real flow, just like fraudulent | scientific studies fill the framework to look legit and where | the layperson, and even scientists who aren't great with | understanding statistics will believe it - and which media | easily will promote as clickbait, making it a popular "truth" | that the masses get familiarized with even if a shallow and | incorrect conclusion is propagated. | cush wrote: | Congrats on shipping! Also congrats on your servers being | overwhelmed! Clearly there's a demand here | exotree wrote: | Love this. Thank you. Definitely something I will use every day. | Would love to provide "coffee money" ($5/month) to keep the | lights on. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-07 23:00 UTC)