[HN Gopher] Introducing a16z START ___________________________________________________________________ Introducing a16z START Author : picture Score : 59 points Date : 2022-04-18 21:49 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (a16z.com) (TXT) w3m dump (a16z.com) | Optimal_Persona wrote: | I9g a16z S3T ...f2y | staunch wrote: | Out of dozens of fairly lame attempts by others, this may very | well end up becoming the most serious competitor to YC so far. | | It'll all come down to who they get to run it, how well they run | it, and if they can consistently get the attention of founders. | A16Z certainly has the brand and money to make a real go of it. | | I wonder if they know what makes YC special and if they can offer | the first head-to-head alternative. | | (The 404'ing "more information" link isn't a great way to start | though :D) | gordon_freeman wrote: | their application seems pretty simple to fill out (in some | cases requiring less than 100 words of description) unlike YC | app so I assume they want to funnel interest from as many | founders as possible before deciding which apps to pick to | fund. | staunch wrote: | Which _could_ be their first mistake. YC gets a lot of signal | by requiring people to clearly answer so many questions. YC | 's questions are really good and it wouldn't have been a bad | idea to wholesale copy them like some other's have. Not least | of all because then founders could apply quickly using copy- | paste. | | I suspect someone could out-compete YC just by obtaining the | YC application data and funding on that basis alone, | eschewing the interview process entirely as it very possibly | introduces more noise than signal. It'd take some guts | though, kinda like starting YC in the first place took guts. | t_mann wrote: | Kinda funny to see this promoted on a site hosted by Y | Combinator. | seizethecheese wrote: | Well, it's certainly of interest for those here. | binarynate wrote: | Based on the info available, here are some of the differences | between the new a16z START program and YC: | | - No standard deal (looks like a16z will negotiate equity | separately with each startup) | | - _Potentially_ double the check size (up to $1M compared to the | standard YC $500k deal) | | - Much smaller batch sizes (currently 11 in START, compared to | 319 in YC W21) | | - The obvious: different network connections, mentors, and track | records | bspear wrote: | A16Z's superpower is branding and getting their name out there. | Their fund returns are well below Sequoia & co | eganp wrote: | $1M in seed funding, but at what valuation? I hope the terms are | near market. | Xeoncross wrote: | > our team has received over 1,000 applications and welcomed 11 | START entrepreneurs into the a16z family | | 1% chance eh? Welp, I'll never be exclusive enough to make it | through | devoutsalsa wrote: | Keep in mind that most applications are not impressive & are | dismissed without much thought. Only a few are even interesting | enough for a second meeting. If you're interesting & you know | it, your odds are better than you think. | throwaway_1928 wrote: | "If you were the president of Harvard or Stanford and you | wanted to get a lynch mob of students, alumni, and faculty to | come after you, what you should say is something like this: We | live in this much larger, more global world. We offer this | great education to everybody. So we're going to double or | triple our enrollment over the next 15 to 20 years. And people | would all be furious, because the value of the degree comes | from massive exclusion. And what you're really running is | something like a Studio 54 night club that's got an incredibly | long line outside and a very small number of people let inside. | It's branded as positive sum, everybody can learn, but the | reality is that it is deeply zero sum." [1] | | [1] | https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/07/peter-t... | krsrhe wrote: | ceeplusplus wrote: | These acceptance rates are misleading. A lot of those | applications probably have no MVP and founders have no skills. | If you filter to only those people who 1) have a product with | some degree of traction or interest and 2) people who have | qualified backgrounds, either in previous startups or FAANG or | something else that gives them credibility, I think you'll find | the acceptance rate is a lot higher. | current_thing wrote: | One of the four investment themes: "American Dynamism: Investing | in founders and companies that support the national interest". | | Haha. No thanks. | | Are there any seed funds that invest in "supporting human | progress"? | seizethecheese wrote: | A patriotic American might say that supporting the national | interest actually does support human progress. There's plenty | of evidence against that, but some evidence for it might be the | immense number of people pulled from poverty under to the | American rules-based international order. | current_thing wrote: | A pacifist European might balk at the a16z brand and support | companies funded by a less nationalistic VC, exit their | liquidity pools in crypto etc. | andrewstuart wrote: | Anyone got a guess what the terms might be - how much quity they | want, if the terms are likely to be onerous? | nrmitchi wrote: | I've seen this shared all over today, but no where have I seen | any terms/valuation shared. | | Does anyone have more information? | EGreg wrote: | How is this different than their other funds meant for startups? | carmen_sandiego wrote: | It's AH so... more hype when they want to advertise it? | staunch wrote: | Accepting applications from absolutely anyone "over the | transom" is the biggest innovation behind YC's success. It's | not a small thing, and something major VCs have historically | refused to take seriously. | binarynate wrote: | It's interesting to see a16z launch an early-stage accelerator | only a couple of weeks after Sequoia announced a similar program: | | https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/20/sequoia-arc-outliers ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-18 23:00 UTC)