[HN Gopher] TX-6 - Teenage Engineering ___________________________________________________________________ TX-6 - Teenage Engineering Author : yurivish Score : 328 points Date : 2022-04-21 13:47 UTC (9 hours ago) (HTM) web link (teenage.engineering) (TXT) w3m dump (teenage.engineering) | vikingcaffiene wrote: | I have an OP-1 and love it. Its a mainstay in my recording and | live performances and honestly my "main" synth despite it looking | like a toy. I keep finding new uses for it. Example: I needed | backup vocals for a part and none of my bandmates could do it. I | sampled the backup vocals and just play them while I sing lead in | that spot. Really cool. | | As for this mixer, I would love this bit of gear but I just can't | justify spending that kind of scratch for what essentially | amounts to a mini mixer (which I already have). It seems really | great though and it being battery powered and tactile like that | is great. | [deleted] | eternityforest wrote: | This is how all mixers should be! I can't believe how audio is | still basically analog. Even digital things are still linked by | analog connections. | | Digital wireless exists but is completely nonstandard. Digital | audio over XLR exists but there are multiple standards and none | are anywhere near as big as analog. | | And mixers are all still analog despite the fact they could | probably be cheaper if it was done in a DSP at sufficient qty, | and there would be no concern about scratchy faders, ever. | cadr wrote: | I saw "from $199" and thought this looked like an incredible | deal. Then realized it was just how the font was rendered, and it | was actually "$1199". I'm not quite sure who the market for this | is - that is crazy. | Tijdreiziger wrote: | Wow, you're not kidding. | tmountain wrote: | Especially with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo is obtainable for | $119. | fredoliveira wrote: | But the Solo is also nowhere _near_ this in terms of | functionality, so I 'm not sure this is a great comparison. | javajosh wrote: | Here's a better comparison: | https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/MG10XU--yamaha- | mg10x... | | "10-channel Analog Mixer with 4 Microphone Preamps, 3 | Dedicated Stereo Line Channels, 1 Aux Send, EQ, 1-knob | Compressors, and Digital Effects" | | $230. It's bigger and needs to plug into a wall. But TBH | I can't think of an application for a battery powered | mixer. | Animats wrote: | It's an elegant little box. Some of those pictures seem to be | renders, though. It doesn't really have motorized sliders. | | Apple used to have a "no cables in ads" thing.[1] TE is copying | that. In use, this box has a lot of cables going in, so it will | look like a mess. So they never show it in use. | | [1] https://www.cultofmac.com/wp- | content/uploads/2012/10/chicnot... | duped wrote: | What bothers me is that I would absolutely buy this if it was | bigger and had 1/4" balanced or stereo TRRS inputs, I actually | have a variety of input sources in my home office that gets dual | use for work, gaming, and music. But to use this I would need to | go XLR to 3.5mm (and no phantom power?) for my voice and amp | mics, main out to a Y split 1/4 TRS for speakers, and 1/4" to | 3.5mm for a synth. So my desk would be littered with annoying | adaptors just to slim down the inputs to fit in those teeny | jacks. | | A built in channel strip that I can keep setup for my mic (gate, | compressor, EQ), plus a metronome for practicing, easy | connectivity to my tablet to record myself a bit? Absolutely | worth it. | | The synth part is a little dumb, but it's TE. | CameronNemo wrote: | Does it even have mic preamps? I would be surprised if you | could plug a mic directly into this without a cloud lifter or | something. | duped wrote: | It says each channel has up to 42dB of gain which seems | plenty for most mics. | tigeba wrote: | This is not really enough gain for most dynamic mics. | Probably passable for many condenser mics, but they would | also need phantom. | robotresearcher wrote: | There are lots of desktop mixers with regular-size connectors | available, some with audio interfaces and effects. This one is | super small and based on mini jacks - that's its | differentiator. | | Main difference from the similar-space BlueBox seems to be | having little faders instead of a touchscreen. And it's twice | the price. Design looks nice, hard to evaluate the usability | from pictures. Menu diving on little screens can be rough. | tayistay wrote: | The TX-6 is aimed at people who own the other TE stuff which is | 3.5mm. If you're looking for a solid audio interface, consider | RME or Apogee. | eweise wrote: | My apogee duet sucked. Always had problems being recognized | by logic and eventually they stopped providing updates to the | software. Got a Motu M4 which is much cheaper and has been | worlds better. | jcpst wrote: | That sucks. I had the opposite experience, for those | curious. I still have my firewire duet, I've been using | over 10 years. Works great. It is unfortunate they stopped | updating the software. My 2010 mac mini is running OS | 10.11, and it works. | duped wrote: | I have an RME actually, but the Apogee stuff has poor support | for anyone not using a Mac. | djtriptych wrote: | Same for me, although 1/8" jacks are quite common among TE's | line. I'm guessing they're targeting enthusiasts who already | own a few other TE devices. | smoldesu wrote: | Octatrack? | resters wrote: | I'm just happy that there are people who can work for Teenage | Engineering building cool things like this. I own a pocket | operator and love seeing the bare board and imagining how fun it | must have been to build and design it. | grobibi wrote: | 48khz max in 2022. The converters must be where they skimped. You | can get a proper RME unit at that price. It looks cute though. | [deleted] | devin wrote: | Anddddd it sold out. TE knows their audience, folks. | [deleted] | wly_cdgr wrote: | This the one that Nilin uses for remixing memories | jacquesm wrote: | That looks like it was made by Braun. Gorgeous but very pricey. | 12ian34 wrote: | I could really do with this, it seems that it would solve some | problems, simplify my workflow AND mean I get to sell a couple of | pieces of gear. I own an OP-1 and feel that it's worth the PS850 | I paid for it second hand but this TX-1 is over twice as much as | I'd be prepared to pay. Shame given its design and feature-set. | Maybe Behringer will put out a shitty PS200 clone in a year or | two ;) | professoretc wrote: | Agreed on both features and the crazy price. I've been using a | TC Helicon Blender to serve as a stereo mixer + AI. | smoldesu wrote: | Hoo boy, Teenage Engineering is starting to get on my nerves. | This is a neat piece of kit, but the specs on it pretty much | relegate it to the "toy" category of their lineup. You're telling | me people are going to use this 48kHz dongle as a portable DAC? | You probably have a better output on your laptop. Pretty absurd. | This thing is pretty much a physical iPhone app... that costs | more than an iPhone. | | What really pisses me off about this is the price. Yes, please | dogpile me about how "specialty hardware like this doesn't | exist", that totally excuses this thing's existence! Seriously | though, you can buy a brand new Octatrack for this price (actual | professional equipment). But if this thing isn't competing with | the OT, what's it's purpose? Being a digital multitrack recorder? | Feeling nice in your pocket? Just being smaller than it's | competitors no matter the expense? | | The more I look at this thing, the more it annoys me. Teenage | Engineering has always been about shipping hipster audio | products, but even their older stuff was fairly passable. As much | as I despise the OP-1 (even moreso after it's price hike), it had | a lot of cool ideas in it. It was an obvious labor of love. I | can't make heads or tails of this TX-6. I genuinely don't know | who would buy this. In my head, I'm watching bourgeoisie college | students walking around San Francisco to make lo-fi hip hop from | found sounds with this thing. That's it. I can't see anyone using | this in a professional setting. The OP-Z is an actual joke in the | pro audio community, but I've still seen people use it at shows. | The Pocket Operator is little more than a cheap toy, but people | have fun sketching rhythms on them and even using the later | models as super lo-fi samplers. This is... nothing. I truly and | honestly don't understand it. | lancesells wrote: | Try to think of it in the same context as a watch. There are | price ranges from $10 to probably $1M+. They all have a | function of tell you the time. Price is a silly thing to be | upset about it unless you truly needed it to live (which no one | does). | Archit3ch wrote: | Except Behringer doesn't clone Omega... yet! | smoldesu wrote: | _checks watch_ | | Give them... 6 months? | l33tbro wrote: | That actually makes sense. Watches are a status item and, as | OP (pardon the pun) points out, Teenage Engineering is a bit | of an aspirational/hipster brand. | makz wrote: | My thoughts almost exactly. The thing is beautiful but useless. | ruined wrote: | if i wanted a simple mixer and usb audio interface with fx send | and i _didn 't_ want to spend a thousand dollars on it, what's | the range of alternatives | | i've spent under $150 on every individual item in my kit so far | and it feels silly to blow past that on a mixer. | MrBuddyCasino wrote: | FX send narrows it down, I think the Mackie ProFX6v3 and the | Behringer Flow 8 should do the trick if you want small & cheap. | Otherwise the Yamaha AG03/AG06 are decent too. | ruined wrote: | thanks | scarecrowbob wrote: | Behringer xr12 might be a good choice. I have been using the | xr18 (x32, etc) for years and they are good values. | | A Focusrite Scarlet 8i6 would serve as a mixer if you don't | mind being tied to a computer. | | But if you just needed a mixer, the Yamaha MG series stuff is | fine and in line with your price point. | P_I_Staker wrote: | Mackie, Zoom, and Allen & Heath have mixers for 300ish buck, | with 10ish inputs and are fairly featurefull. | | I wouldn't count on the interface doing everything you dream | of, even if it seems like it can based on specs. I owned the | allen & heath, but traded it for the mackie one. It's okay, but | there's a few annoyances. | | Keep in mind that the FX send will also require a return (may | sound obvious, but it's not to everyone), therefore, it will | consume an input; they basically never have a dedicated return | (it's pretty much pointless). | | The FX send itself might not be really necessary, but I don't | know enough to say for sure. I think they could just label it | AUX, and that any auxiliary, or monitor send can work for FX... | I'm not sure. I've used them before and the FX to monitor / | sample. | kamranjon wrote: | Not sure this tics all your boxes but in a similar form factor | the zoom H6 seems to be something people really like (the h4n | was kinda huge when it first came out) - | https://zoomcorp.com/en/us/handheld-recorders/handheld-recor... | ruined wrote: | i've got an h4n, i played with it yesterday, but i am looking | for something with faders and an auxiliary effects loop to | mix synths for dawless jamming | vvvzxd wrote: | yamaha mixers are good | l33tbro wrote: | There are far better and cheaper optionsavailable. | | I recently bought a Mackie 1604 for a hundred bucks. It's from | 1993 and they were basically designed to fall off buildings. | Super transparent and likely to outlast this thing due to being | much more operable. Not as pretty or quirky, but that doesn't | really factor in to my use case. | | For stereo compression, you can get a brand new Really Nice | Compressor for a couple of hundred bucks. Steve Albini has | these in his studio, so that alone should indicate their high | quality. | abxytg wrote: | you're paying 4 figures or you're getting a plastic piece of | crap from $50 on amazon, and it just has line out not usb | audio. | biztos wrote: | I am the lower end of the target market for this: I mess around | with synthesizers and I prefer DAW-less and while it wouldn't be | an impulse purchase, I could probably afford it. | | Except that it doesn't record, so I still need another device at | the end of the chain. | | I can't figure that out. For the price, surely recording would | have fit. It's digital audio anyway, right, in order to do the | effects? | | There might be a good reason why there's no built-in recorder, | and maybe someone will explain it to me, but it seems like a | massive missed opportunity to be the last link in a serious | portable synth chain. | drcongo wrote: | Stupidly expensive and I have absolutely no need for it, but just | look how beautiful it is. | tpmx wrote: | It's almost disgustingly expensive for what it is. | kamranjon wrote: | If it was a digital recorder similar to a tascam portastudio | I could see it being really awesome as a sort of high end | version of the standalone recording system but just an | interface seems incredibly overpriced - you can buy compact | interfaces already (they've been designed for video | applications by zoom and tascam) that have quality preamps | and great battery life which also function as recorders. It | does look nice though. I hope they are able to scale up on | their products so they become more affordable because I would | really like to but their synth but I am not quite in the | experience bracket to justify it but it seems really fun. | flats wrote: | Yeah, agreed that this I s an insane price point given that | (unless I'm missing something) there's only one preamp and | it only works for an inline headphone mic. | drivers99 wrote: | The way people are going on about the price I was expecting | it to be a lot higher. It's about the price of a video card. | speedgoose wrote: | It's cheaper than a boat too. | Gracana wrote: | Wouldn't you want to compare it to the prices of other | mixers, not video cards? | alias_neo wrote: | I absolutely love their design language. I'll never have a need | to own any of their products but I wish I could buy the gadgets I | do need/want with this kind of design/style. | bborud wrote: | IKEA actually sold a bluetooth speaker for a while designed by | TE. I got two of them. They are excellent. | | PS: anyone want a used Sonos? | eej71 wrote: | If the people who design the atrocious touch screen interfaces | inside of cars could get educated by the nice people at teenage | engineering, that would be swell. | alias_neo wrote: | I was just watching some reviews of electric cars and noticed | a tendency to remove all tactility. | | Some of the models have "touch" buttons for drive mode, and | things like environmental controls being touch or on screens | is horrid. | | It's bad enough having to look away from the road for a | fraction of a second to find the AC switch in my Nissan, | these newer "solutions" just feel plain unsafe. | sanderjd wrote: | Whatever all this stuff is does look good, but the website | doesn't do a good job of explaining what it is, IMO. I know | this is because I'm not their target market, but maybe they'd | bring me into that market if they did a bit of explaining | somewhere on the site of why I might be interested in their | gear? | stu2b50 wrote: | That's wouldn't really be possible. You'd have to have audio | equipment to be interested in an audio interface. Trying to | sell outside that market doesn't really make sense. | | It would be like trying to convince someone without a camera | to buy your camera lens. | drewzero1 wrote: | To convince someone to buy a camera lens, you might first | convince them to buy a camera. | Fargoan wrote: | If you don't know what a mixer/audio interface is, you don't | need or want one | danachow wrote: | Right at the very beginning: | | > ultra-portable pro-mixer and audio interface. | | TX-6 is our ultra-portable, battery-powered mixer and multi- | channel audio interface. comparable to larger units, but with | even more tech packed into one sturdy little machine. | | I'd say that's pretty damn clear what it is and that it's | "ultra portable." What were you expecting them to add? | colechristensen wrote: | Lots of people don't know what a mixer or audio interface | is. | filoleg wrote: | It is a specialized tool for a specific set of tasks. If | you don't even know what this (very clearly named and | commonly known in the industry/hobby) type of a tool is | used for, you definitely don't have a need for it. | | Your issue with it is akin to someone complaining that a | promo page for a premium-tier oscillator clearly states | that it is an oscillator, but doesn't explain what | oscillators are and what they can be used for. | rchaud wrote: | It's not an iPod, it won't be advertised to a general | audience. People that visit the TE website will usually | have heard about it from word of mouth. | squeaky-clean wrote: | And those people definitely aren't in the market for a | $1200 audio interface. If you don't own several pieces of | gear already, this device has literally no use. If you do | own several pieces of gear and want to record and mix | them simultaneously, a $1200 interface is not going to be | the first one you purchase. | colechristensen wrote: | Sure, but people who know all had to learn eventually. | | I often find myself wondering what a product or service | is for not being a target customer in the know. | | It would be nice if there were more instances of products | telling people who don't know what they are. | karmakaze wrote: | Reminds me of the time I swapped out the main headlight of my | Volvo 850. It required no tools, merely pulling on some large | sprung wires with convenient finger rings. It had a very Lego | friendliness to the whole process. Lego of course is Danish, | Volvo (at the time) and TE being Swedish. | alias_neo wrote: | In a very similar fashion, I was pleasantly surprised that I | can tear down every mechanical part of my Dyson cordless | vacuum to wash them without a single tool. | | On the subject of Volvo, I'm shortlisting the Polestar 2 as a | candidate for my next car. | sneak wrote: | Me too. They are aping the Rams look as well as Ive/Apple did | at their best, and now Apple doesn't do it any longer. | andybak wrote: | > Rams look | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieter_Rams | nebula8804 wrote: | Reminds me of the nicer things that IKEA makes. Its pleasant | and calming. Those Swedish people know what they are doing. :) | bborud wrote: | https://www.ikea.com/us/en/new/frekvens-limited- | collection-p... | earthboundkid wrote: | You can get their headset for cheap! That's what I did. And | also the Playdate, although it's not cheap. | itintheory wrote: | I'm pretty sure you can't get the Playdate, unless by get you | mean pre-order for delivery in 2023. | spython wrote: | There was a collaboration with IKEA, where teenage engineering | designed the bluetooth loudspeakers. I have the big ones | (10x20cm) and they are alright for a small room or to take with | you to the garden. Nice but nothing special. The tiny ones for | 19EUR were really something - nice design, good sound for the | size and price, and really, having a rotating knob on such a | small stylish thing feels just great. | randito wrote: | IKEA Frekvens. Link: | https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/23/21079667/ikea-teenage- | eng... | internetvin wrote: | Yeah definitely feel the same way about wishing this design | language and approach was applied to everyday tools and | objects. | dmd wrote: | I don't need to own my OP-1, but I'm glad I do. It makes me | happy every time I look at it. | ketzo wrote: | The OP-1 is one of those products that makes me want to | change my entire lifestyle and personality just so I could | possibly justify owning it. | | It's just so _neat_. | fumar wrote: | I have sold and bought the OP-1 twice now. At one point, I | tried to replace my DAW and synths workflow with the single | OP-1 unit. It didn't work. Three years later, I missed the | OP-1 sounds and bought it on a whim, but I realized again | how limited the sound palette is and its ability to work | alongside non-OP-1 instruments. Both times, its aesthetic | appeal and aspirational dream won over the rational me. It | is a cool device. I will stick to Ableton Live, a few | synths, and a midi controller. | | The TX-6 is appealing to the gadget nerd in me... | tomcam wrote: | That is so shallow. Also, I feel exactly the same way. | post_break wrote: | I'm so jealous. It's the one thing I lust after but can't | justify. I wish I could rent one and see how bad it twists | the knife towards pulling the credit card out. | officeplant wrote: | It's always depressing to look back on the time I hopped on a | backorder list for one then gave up after months of waiting | only to have them gradually get more and more expensive when | restocked. I really wanted to get one early on but dear lord | they are so expensive now days. | koofdoof wrote: | The Panic Playdate they designed just came out, if you're in | the market for a $200 game machine it might be suitable. | gorgoiler wrote: | TE have also designed a phone. It's coming out soon with their | partner Nothing, who are committed to affordability: | | https://www.androidcentral.com/phones/nothing-phone-1 | | They also were the design firm behind these ear buds too, which | are pretty neat: | | https://www.rtings.com/headphones/reviews/nothing/ear-1-trul... | moron4hire wrote: | I've come to expect Teenage Engineering's products to be | expensive, but I have definitely underestimated them once again. | incanus77 wrote: | Once, just once, I would like to see someone say "why is this so | expensive, it's just [...]" _and then_ build one themselves, and | bring it to market, for that lower cost. Go ahead, just try. | aikinai wrote: | That's how Anker got started I believe. | arkades wrote: | My understanding is that anker got started with standard | white labed alibaba type goods, but differentiated themselves | with good curation, meaning you actually got something decent | at a low price | dsr_ wrote: | If you insist on the portable form-factor, it will be slightly | troublesome. | | If it's going to sit on a desk and be used all the time, a | Behringer 1222USB is $250 when they aren't running a special | sale. It has more channels, some usable effects, and you can | add an iPad Mini with some synth software to handle the rest of | the functionality. So that's half the price, and you get to | play with the iPad whenever you aren't making music; or it's | about 1/6 the price of the TX-6 without the synth. | sanderjd wrote: | Don't people do that all the time and sometimes fail and | sometimes succeed? Isn't this why we have competitive products | and competing price points for most things? | joemi wrote: | What all the people disagreeing with you are ignoring is the | work and skill that goes into the product design. It takes a | lot of iteration, which means lots of prototypes, which means | lots of time and money spent just developing the product. This | means iteration on the electronics, the UI, the case, etc etc. | Anyone could whip together something that's bigger, uglier, and | has a worse user interface, all for less money, but to make | something equivalent to what TE makes is a what takes all the | time/money/effort/skill. | | Also most of the disagreers are also ignoring the "bring it to | market" step. Even if you built something of equivalent product | design as TE, building one for yourself is vastly different | than doing a product run where you expect each product to be | the same. PCB design and manufacturing is relatively easy and | inexpensive, but all the plastic/rubber forming/molding is much | trickier and significantly expensive. Getting past the | manufacturing aspect, there's the whole marketing, sales, and | distribution aspect, which aren't anything to be sneezed at | either. Seriously a lot of work goes into bringing a product to | market that DIYers building single devices or very tiny runs of | devices don't even consider. While TE might not be doing | Behringer-level runs of products, their runs are definitely | bigger than a lone DIYer could ever handle by themselves. | | (Note: This isn't to say that TE's products are necessarily | better for everyone than something they could make themselves | (or buy for less from a different company), of course. After | all, the world's musicians got by just fine before this mixer | was released. I just wanted to chime in and explain some of | reasons why TE's stuff costs more than what you might think you | could make yourself.) | vvvzxd wrote: | not understanding this argument. i'm not a synth manufacturer. | korg and roland put out plenty of gear with great features for | a lower price than this | incanus77 wrote: | Well, someone should tell TE then, because they've obviously | don't know they're making a huge mistake and this will fail | miserably. | an-unknown wrote: | If you actually build one yourself (not just limited to this | particular mixer, but also e.g. analog synthesizers, FM | synthesizers, samplers, ...), you'll be surprised by how | ridiculously overpriced almost all of the available audio | hardware really is. The sad part is that in many cases your | prototype will be cheaper than the commercially available audio | hardware. | | In practice you'll probably skip the "and bring it to market" | step though, because usually you'll start such a project | because you wanted to have a specific | mixer/synthesizer/sampler/..., and once you have it on your | desk, the next project usually looks more interesting than | spending the extra time to sell whatever you just developed. | IAmPym wrote: | As someone who literally does this for a living at | Sequential, you couldn't be more wrong | javajosh wrote: | I don't do this for a living and can't imagine how a | statement like "your prototype will be cheaper than | commercially available options" could be taken seriously by | anyone. | eternityforest wrote: | If you don't count your time whatsoever and don't go for | the nice case design. | | I mean at the extreme case, if you can tolerate 40ms of | latency and stuttering, a Raspberry Pi and some USB | soundcards can do it all. The actual power needed is | reasonable and ADC/DACs aren't that insane. | | A Teensy 4.1 connected to an ESP32 could probably do most | of this, if you wanted to do $15k of software development | in your spare time and were really good at DSP. | alfalfasprout wrote: | As others have mentioned you're not considering the enclosure | at all. And doubtful you're including your time, QA, etc. | zokier wrote: | > The sad part is that in many cases your prototype will be | cheaper than the commercially available audio hardware. | | Are you including those probably custom knurled knobs, | buttons and sliders in that guesstimate too? Because those | are the sort of things I'd expect to bring the cost up here. | Heck, that beautifully finished aluminum case with its | beveled edges alone is good chunk of money. | squarefoot wrote: | No need to try as it already exists: Any Linux tablet with | Reaper and a couple soft synths and a decent external sound | card if needed would do a lot more for a lot less. A good | portion of the cost of this device could be justified only if | it really had motorized knobs and faders, which are shown in | the video but not mentioned among the features; that would be a | completely unnecessary gimmick (in such a device) which however | would impact a lot on the cost. | | Portable music devices aren't that expensive these days. Take a | look at what SunVox can do on old hardware, or maybe the | Polyend Tracker, which is a hardware solution that costs less | than half of the tx-6 and doesn't kill the eyes on a toy | display. | | https://warmplace.ru/soft/sunvox/ | | https://polyend.com/tracker/ | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQufJBVvAtY | abxytg wrote: | neither of these are remotely close to the tx-6.... | rchaud wrote: | Just say it costs $100/mo for 12 months for on-prem. They'll | think it's an exciting new enterprise B2B SaaS. | nathanvanfleet wrote: | Not really a valid argument. Plenty of similar products out | there with more competitive prices. "Make this complex product | yourself" is the equivalent argument as "if you don't like | something with your country just leave." People can complain | that something is expensive. | alfalfasprout wrote: | This is a ridiculous equivalence. If you live in a country | you don't have a choice but be subject to its laws, politics, | etc. You'd have to leave. | | No one is forcing you to buy this product. | speed_spread wrote: | Nowhere near as Wired-friendly as this, but as portable mixers | go, Zoom's Livetrak series is where it's at IMHO. | arkad wrote: | +1 for that. Especially Zoom LiveTrak L-8 has nice pack of | features for its size (nowhere as portable as TX-6, but still) | and is also battery powered. | adamrezich wrote: | slightly off-topic but I often listen to podcasts while playing | video games and I've long wanted a simple device--ideally | battery-powered and portable but I'll take what I can get--that | takes two audio inputs and produces one audio output, allowing me | to crossfade between the two as needed, so I can mix between two | audio sources on the fly. does something like this exist, and if | so, how expensive is it? I haven't been able to find anything. | MrBuddyCasino wrote: | The Gnome 202 is surprisingly decent, very low noise. Its | portable if attached to a power bank. | | https://www.steinigke.de/de/mpn10006880-omnitronic-gnome-202... | vvvzxd wrote: | 2 channel audio mixer, pretty much one of the most common | devices out there | adamrezich wrote: | interesting, I was looking on Amazon like a year ago and | couldn't find anything like that, but now I see there's | several <$50 devices just like that! thanks | FerociousTimes wrote: | This device has Dieter Rams' fingerprints all over it. | gorkish wrote: | God this thing is gonna look and work so much worse with 10 | cables hanging out of it. Probably isn't even heavy enough to | stay in one place against all of that mess, but yeah there's | about a million times I can recall where having such a thing in | the bag would have saved someone's bacon. | | I do also expect to see plenty of hipsters unnecessarily self- | flagellating themselves with it, per TE tradition. | H1Supreme wrote: | Price aside, what is the use case for this? Bands or electronic | live sets will already be bringing a bunch of gear (with 1/4" | connections, almost universally) to a show. The size of their 6 | channel mixer will not really come into play when you consider | guitars, amps, synths, etc. | | So, who is this for? People using iPads and iPhones that need the | smallest possible mixer? The audio interface aspect is available | in many other mixers already. So, that's not a unique feature. | cestith wrote: | I would say it's handy for a jam bag or gig bag when a show | suddenly happens, or as a backup when you need additional | channels because part of your board failed,, or maybe you were | counting on the venue's board and it has too few features or | inputs. I would say that, if it was $600 and not $1200. | | This might be handy for the Youtube buskers and such who are | trying to minimize equipment size to stay very mobile. | | My mixer is old, used, and not palm-sized but I just twiddle | around at home. I've not released a track to friends and family | for years, let alone performed a gig or sold anything on | streaming services. So for someone like me this is a really | cool toy to look at but well beyond an impulse buy. | adwi wrote: | "To keep the battery healthy, the unit should be charged at least | every 6 months. if not used for a long time, it may not charge | again." | | ... it may not charge again? Haven't heard this warning in | consumer electronics before. | kamranjon wrote: | It's common for things with non-swappable batteries but | companies might not be so explicit about the need for it. Have | a higher end video camera that is same way, have to keep | reminding myself to keep it charged up. | bryanrasmussen wrote: | https://superuser.com/questions/1517665/laptop-battery-not-c... | batteries that go through long periods of disuse often have | problems, I would suppose that companies that do not mention | this edge case aren't as conscientious as those that do. | jeffbee wrote: | I guess I'm alone in my preference for the design of e.g. the | Sony DMX-P01 or the Zoom F8n. Maybe it's because I'm from the | past. | CharlesW wrote: | I hope you don't feel bad for not vibing with Teenage | Engineering's design choices. I personally really like the | Dieter Rams-ian aesthetic, but this is a product for people | with more money than sense. | jeffbee wrote: | Now that you mention it this does somehow invoke the visual | aesthetic of the World Receiver. I wonder if that is | intentional. | | For me a portable audio device with this many knobs should | also be covered in writing and scales, like a Nagra IV. | wodenokoto wrote: | Off-topic, but I noticed they have their Bluetooth speaker in | "off-white" - that is, bright orange. I thought that was pretty | funny. | | https://teenage.engineering/store/ob-4-off-white-set/ | tern wrote: | Off-White[1] is a fashion brand started by the late Virgil | Abloh[2]. | | [1] https://www.off---white.com/en-us | | [2] https://www.instagram.com/virgilabloh/ | rpmisms wrote: | Halo hardware, absolutely, but their design sense is utterly | phenomenal. What a gorgeous piece of kit. | reaperducer wrote: | If I were ever to go back to the Wintel world (or whatever the | word is for Windows+AMD), Teenage Engineering's computer is | probably the only one my wife would allow in the house: | | https://teenage.engineering/products/computer-1 | bullen wrote: | She should take a look at http://streacom.com, they combine | look and functionality with their silent cases. | MrBuddyCasino wrote: | It looks interesting, but for me it hasn't got the same | "want!" factor their other products have. | | The T1 10L ITX case just launched, waiting for its arrival: | https://formdworks.com/ | gigaflop wrote: | I was looking at SFF cases, so I keep an eye open for | lesser-known ones. I was willing to add another to the list | of contenders, but I just don't get why that site asks for | a password, and shows only one image of something that | they're trying to sell. | | I get that it's limited-run stuff, but why would they hide | information about their product? Visiting their website is | pretty much worthless if they only sell in batches, and | don't allow access between batches. | MrBuddyCasino wrote: | They're really bad at marketing, better check the | subreddit or discord. It has been two years and this | month it has finally launched, so it wouldn't be insane | to consider it. | | The only contender is the JIMU D+ v2.0, or the Dan H2O if | you can compromise on looks or quality. | MDGeist wrote: | I've only owned one Teenage product (the Megaman Pocket | Operator) but now I really want the comp 1. Cool that they've | expanded beyond synths! | scns wrote: | As sibling allready hinted at, check out Streacom: | https://fabiensanglard.net/the_beautiful_machine/index.html | folkhack wrote: | Well that's the first time I've ever seen a 1:1 EIZO used in | _anything_ marketing related. | | That monitor used in their marketing photo is the EV2730Q and | it's an absolute beast if you're looking for a balance | between horizontal/vertical aspect ratios. Obviously not | fantastic for gaming (minus Factorio), but for programming + | shell work it's outstanding. | crate_barre wrote: | Real life Winamp skin. I want one just because of how it looks. | Aeolun wrote: | I can't think of a reason I would need this, but I still want it. | nimbius wrote: | my biggest axe to grind with this company is the outrageous | pricetag for everything they sell. | | With $100 bags, $700 mini boom boxes, and $15 patches You may as | well call it Affluent Engineering. | whywhywhywhy wrote: | This might sound weird but I think the audience they're | targeting the high price is part of the enjoyment. There is a | weight, status and a value to an expensive item. | | I work in hardware so understand the costs involved but I also | think the high price is beneficial to them from a brand | perspective. Brand-wise the amount of buzz they generate from | relatively niche products is impressive. | [deleted] | zoul wrote: | If you're just interested in a tiny EUR130 mixer, Bastl Dude is | great: | | https://noise.kitchen/bastl-instruments/bastl-instruments-du... | pcvonz wrote: | The demo video is great[1]. I picked one up from my local synth | shop, it's a nice little mixer. Perfect for all my tiny desktop | synths (Kastl, M8, NanoLoop FM). I admire the design of TE | stuff, but the premium is hard to justify for me (especially | since I mostly dabble in music). | | [1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e0egbPlKrfA | vvvzxd wrote: | can someone explain to me why their gear is so expensive? i have | a lot of synths and have been collecting them for a long time, | and I have no idea why the OP1 should cost 1000 dollars. it | really just seems like a toy, do professionals actually use them? | WickyNilliams wrote: | Take a look at Red Means Recording on YouTube for what the OP-1 | is capable of. Very cool piece of hardware | Jackim wrote: | professionals absolutely use the OP-1. Deadmau5, Kevin Parker | of Tame Impala, Skrillex, Thom Yorke and many more. | colechristensen wrote: | You have to pick a price for high end low volume products and | that price often ends up containing a whole lot of development | and overhead costs. You can cut corners with development and | materials and lose the high end to try for volume, you can try | to get your thing very popular, or you can just stick to high | prices. High prices tends to get you a better customer base and | a sense of exclusivity which drives sales. | rileyphone wrote: | Love Teenage Engineering, though I've never been able to justify | buying something from them (especially not this!). Though I am | looking forward to the Playdate [0], which they designed. | | [0] https://play.date/ | wyldfire wrote: | Never heard of this before now but it looks really fun. Somehow | I can't help thinking that just a dash of color might have made | it more interesting. But it seems like it keeps things simple. | $180 seems really steep for this but they have some kind of | hipster edge here. I'm not even completely turned off for $180 | for this lo-fi unit. | | Since it's called 'playdate' and since it looks kinda retro -- | a cable to play head-to-head games like the original Nintendo | GameBoy did would be pretty cool. | WickyNilliams wrote: | Pocket operators are (relatively) cheap and a whole lot of fun! | I have the po-33 which is a sampler. It's amazing how much you | can do with it. One of those devices where the limitations | force you to be creative. | | Can thoroughly recommend if you're in any way inclined. Their | other pocket operators are more synthy, but I'm a hip hop head | so naturally gravitated towards the sampler. | zachruss92 wrote: | I totally didn't realize Teenage Engineering made the Playdate. | I'm even more exited for it now. Early reviews say it's quite | fun. | srik wrote: | Me neither, but it makes total sense now. | WillPostForFood wrote: | Teenage Engineering designed the hardware for Panic Inc (the | Mac software devs in Portland). Panic is the company actually | making/selling it. | formerkrogemp wrote: | Is there a geriatric engineering company? | defterGoose wrote: | Interestingly, for my usual use case, they made this product | almost obsolete several months ago when they unlocked the USB | audio functionality for the OP-1. Now that I have full stereo | in/out at what I assume is 96k, and the ability to edit and | playback from a DAW, the addition of a "real-world" audio | interface like a duet or something for doing mics makes more | sense than this. | | I still want one. | jasonjayr wrote: | From the specs: | | > to keep the battery healthy, the unit should be charged at | least every 6 months. if not used for a long time, it may not | charge again. | | ..... why is that? | MrBuddyCasino wrote: | Batteries self-discharge. If they are fully discharged for a | long time, they may get damaged irreversibly. This is the case | with most battery chemistries and not specific to the TX-6. | kmeisthax wrote: | Like most Teenage Engineering products, it's an absolutely | amazing-looking, well-engineered product with a ton of | functionality that does a thing I don't actually need for far | more money than I can justify spending on it. | Fargoan wrote: | Yeah, I would buy this if it was half the price. I can't | justify spending $1200 on it. | encryptluks2 wrote: | I've got a Pyle mixer that will do the same for approximately | $80 | LegitShady wrote: | TE products tend to be poorly manufactured. Go look at an op-z | that bends and causes double trigs, with soft non standard feet | you need to turn to open to get access to the interior of the | device. Take a look at all the pocket operators they break | regularly (I owned 4 and two broke from even casual use) and | you cannt get spare parts like screens from te. | | And ton of functionality? Go take a look at the ob-4 a | Bluetooth speaker with a radio, a sort of tape delay thing, and | no audio out. | | I used to be a fan of teenage engineering but the low quality | of the products I've had of theirs and the extremely high | prices have led me to a totally different conclusion. | | This mixer is overpriced and requires super special teenage | engineering slimline cables to fit all of its inputs at the | same time. | | I am looking for a portable mixer but this monstrosity by a | company that has a history of quality issues is not the mixer I | am looking for. | mellavora wrote: | So, Apple! | fastball wrote: | Eh, all my Apple devices do exactly what I need them to. | recursive wrote: | Lucky for you. Once I tried to copy a single audio file to | my ipod without going through the whole itunes journey. | Spoiler alert: In the end I just stopped using apple stuff. | post_break wrote: | I tried the same with a mini disc player. Knowing what a | product does and how it does it is kind of key though. | recursive wrote: | It worked before the firmware update through a Winamp | plug in. But to your point I will be avoiding this | product in the same way I avoid Apple products. | rchaud wrote: | Pre-Intel Apple, or back when you needed a Mac computer for | your iPod to sync, because USB mass storage isn't elegant | enough or whatever. | vvvzxd wrote: | is it good engineering to put a synthesizer and sequencer | inside of a mixer? how do you even use those features? | relaxing wrote: | For a portable tool you can play with on a flight or in a | park or on public transit, it sounds like a fun option to | have. | | > how do you even use those features? | | It has knobs, what more do you need to make music? The user | guide if you're curious: | https://teenage.engineering/guides/tx-6 | sdenton4 wrote: | A sequencer for the /mixer/ is terribly terribly useful. | Basically like having control parameters in a tracker, but | for any arbitrary input you've plugged into the mixer. And | knowing TE, I would be shocked if you couldn't target the | mixer params with the sequencer. (Arguably, this is part of | the value prop (hahahahahaha) for modular synthesizers.) | | The synthesizer is probably more 'because they can,' once the | rest of the software/hardware interface is in place. It's | close enough to what they've already done lots of with the | pocket operators; might as well throw one in so people can | prototype sounds easily. | [deleted] | tinco wrote: | I wonder why it's so expensive, I know it should be higher than | regular consumers expect because it's a low volume high quality | product, but so is the OP-1 and that seems to have a lot more | manufacturing overhead. | | Wouldn't this product just contain a small signal processing | FPGA, a bunch of ADC's and a couple DAC's? It's small but I think | those should fit fine in that enclosure with a thick PCB. | | Anyone know if there's anything really special in there? Not | hating if there isn't, the product is probably worth it to many | people regardless, just wondering. | | edit: just to clear the easiest explanation, since it's even more | niche than the OP-1 it needs that much more margin? If it sells | 1/10th the quantity it needs 10x the margin maybe. | jelling wrote: | Serious answer: expensive synths are the new expensive guitars. | For the previous generation, guitar makers began cranking out | premium priced guitars for purchase by people outside their | prime music making years and into their prime earning years. | Said guitars frequently just hung on the wall, which was fine | because they were designed to be status items anyway. | ng55QPSK wrote: | Synths were always expensive. Polyphonic, analog Stuff was | clearly in the 5-digit prices. Digitalisation brought this | down to 4...5000EUR. | an-unknown wrote: | Back in the day, it somewhat made sense that polyphonic | synthesizers were expensive, since the electronics itself | was expensive. Today, if you have a few weekends time, you | can rather easily design your own custom analog polyphonic | synthesizer in e.g. Eurorack format, manufacture it for | something around 30-50EUR (e.g. using some Chinese PCB | manufacturer + their SMT assembly service), and the | resulting module will outperform modern commercially | available modules that cost multiple times more (think of a | factor of 10x for the price difference). | | It's even crazier if you look at digital synthesizers or | samplers. Remember the E-MU Emulator from 1981, which cost | more than $8000 when it was released? Today, a cheap 5EUR | microcontroller together with a 2EUR DAC will give you more | of everything already (more polyphony, more RAM, higher | sample rate, more resolution per sample, stereo output | instead of mono, ...). | Applejinx wrote: | The trouble comes when it absolutely will not, because | the sound of the 'vintage digital gear' is heavily | influenced by the primitive DACS and typically non- | miniaturized circuitry putting out a relatively low-bit | sound with some serious beef to it. | | This does not apply to the Teenage Engineering... except | to the extent that they've specced it out with fancy | internal parts. They may well be avoiding jellybean op- | amps etc. and producing unusually high quality analog | stages. It IS possible to do that: I think Make Noise | does it very well, and from what little I know about the | Teenage Engineering thing, I wouldn't be surprised if | they were performing on a very high level even though | there's nothing retro about any of it. | | I'd love to see someone do a seriously overkill Pi | DAC/ADC hat. What you're saying is not exactly untrue... | just that the people habitually saying these things are | also the farthest from being able to MAKE it be as true | as they think. The Teenage Engineerings of the world are | more likely to be able to deliver the goods. | jelling wrote: | The Yamaha DX7, the quintessential digital-replacing-analog | synth, cost $2k USD in 1983, not $4-5k. I can't speak for | what that cost in Euros (which didn't exist yet) or with | import tariffs in an unspecified country. Today you can get | one used for $500 USD. And while analog is and was more | expensive, today you can get a Behringer Deep Mind 12 for | $900 USD new and it sounds fantastic. | | Meanwhile, Teenage Engineering is selling a tiny digital | synth for $1,200, which has less functionality than iPad. I | find it hard to take serious as anything other than a | design object but YMMV. | | https://meganlavengood.com/the-yamaha-dx7-in-synthesizer- | his... | | https://www.amazon.com/engineering-Portable-Synthesizer- | Cont... | [deleted] | oriolid wrote: | Maybe an accident, but adjusted for inflation $2000 in | 1983 USD corresponds to $5800 in current money. | Electronics was expensive in the past. | moralestapia wrote: | Their business model is basically doing that + envy and fomo. | | Not criticizing it. | tpmx wrote: | It's the mechanics that's expensive. The casing, the beautiful | metal knurled knobs, all of the various parts made at very high | quality in relatively low numbers. | foobarian wrote: | Look how beautiful and well-designed it is. This is almost | beyond Apple-level taste. I would throw money at this company | if I had the inclination to get into this kind of hobby :-) | | edit: beyond just how it looks and the mechanical properties, I | also wonder how much additional value they added during | integration. Yes the BOM may sound trivial ("small signal | processing FPGA, a bunch of ADC's and a couple DAC's") but IME | it's easy to mess this up without a lot of extra attention. | Example: my TV is plugged into a DAC which powers standing | speakers, and every time I turn it on, there is a discontinuity | that blasts a "pop" at maximum volume through the speakers | regardless of volume level. Or you could end up with a line | level hum if not shielded properly. Etc. | bjt2n3904 wrote: | Small run production with no expense spared of a designer | product for niche applications. | | Expensive expensive expensive! That case looks like it was | milled! | kennywinker wrote: | The niche application part is a little bit made up by them. | Small mixers and audio interfaces are a HUGE market, and a | saturated market. By going high end (by milling a case, for | example) they shrink their market, but also shrink their | competition. The number of portable mixers / audio interfaces | / synthesizers (it's a synth too???) with super fancy | cases... they might be the only one? The keith mcmillian | k-mix is the only thing even similar I can think of and it's | not that similar (and $699) | | Edit: someone in another comment pointed out the 1010 music | bluebox, which is definitely more similar to this than the | kmix, for $549 | | Edit 2: I just remembered the existence of zoom recorders. | The zoom h6 has 6 tracks, is a portable mixer and audio | interface, and also includes 2 good microphones and can | record without being tethered to another device. It's about | $400. It's got a different vibe, but it's also quite | beautiful | duped wrote: | Prosumer audio gadgets are a relatively small market, audio | interfaces are a slice of that. Audio interfaces that | function as mixers are even smaller. | | There's been a boon with stream decks the last few years, | but the only part of that market that's saturated is the | low end. There really are not that many high quality mixers | and audio interfaces out there, and they are not really in | a small form factor like this. | | Not to mention the codec shortage. Making a digital audio | board right now _sucks_. | kennywinker wrote: | I think you might be underestimating the size of the | market for audio interfaces and mixers - but that's just | a feeling mostly based on how many of them are on | craigslist at any given moment in my city. | | But either way you can't deny they're _choosing_ to go | high end. They could have scaled down the software | features of this by 10-20%, put it in a less "jony ive" | case and sold it for $300-600 - but then they would've | had more competition. | duped wrote: | The TAM for pro audio equipment was around $10 billion | and growing when I left working in it a few years ago. | One of the reasons the market is so terrible for | manufacturers is that their own products on the secondary | market cannibalize future sales, which puts a damper on | demand. It's great for professionals that can afford the | high prices and buy stuff that last decades, but not | great for an industry that needs to make new sales each | year and develop future products. There's always cool | stuff to build and develop, don't get me wrong, it's just | not worth a ton of money which means that development | times are long, prices stay pretty high for the good | stuff, and talent is constantly siphoned by other markets | (for example: consumer loudspeakers and AR/VR products: | Apple/Google/Facebook/Amazon have been on hiring sprees | for audio hardware/software developers for the last | decade) | | Over the last decade there was a growth in new products, | but there's a lot of crap. There was also a lot of | consolidation and acquisition because audio hardware | manufacturing is such an expensive thing to do for a | small market, particularly on the high end. | tomcam wrote: | The Zoom H6 has fabulous audio but... beautiful? Looks like | a Klingon marital aid to me | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> I wonder why it's so expensive [...] Wouldn't this product | just contain a small signal processing FPGA, a bunch of ADC's | and a couple DAC's?_ | | If tech products should cost the sum of their parts then an | iPhone 14 Pro and an RTX 3090 should cost about $300. After | all, they're just a PCB with some components on them. | | You're ignoring the enormous R&D costs (engineering salaries, | hardware prototyping, sales, marketing, support, etc.) that | must be recouped, while also turning a profit, through the sale | of each of these low volume products. | | Developing consumer hardware in the west aint cheap, that's why | most western brands other than Apple, and a few other high-end | niche ones, pulled out of the consumer market. | tinco wrote: | I'm not ignoring anything, I'm explicitly not comparing it to | consumer hardware in the first line of my comment. | abxytg wrote: | it has 8 oonboard fx that can be applied to the tracks. drum | machine and synth onboard. Multitrack usb audio device. | n42 wrote: | am I missing something, or is that a giant paddle power switch | that can/will be accidentally pushed downward to off while | working? | | edit: nope, that's exactly what that is. $1,200 for a mixer you | can't use live without duct taping it, I guess. | https://teenage.engineering/guides/tx-6#power-on | tomtheelder wrote: | If you wanted to go with that design then surely down for on | would make more sense, right? Odd choice. | n42 wrote: | Hopefully it's quite a firm switch | jacquesm wrote: | Regardless it should have been a recessed slide. | IAmPym wrote: | "Why is it so expensive?" - commentary from someone who does this | for a living at Sequential | | Small Volume - each unit is more expensive than a large volume | product, you don't get price breaks on any components or tooling | costs | | Design focused - Who is the product for? It isn't for people who | want to spend 250$ on a Behringer mixer. It is for people who | want something that is high quality and doesn't break. Reliable. | For people that rely on their tools to be creative or appreciate | design. You are paying a premium. See Apple for lots of examples. | This is also one of the biggest strengths of the company, if you | want something cheap you're looking in the wrong place. | | Complex - the amount of balance of various components here adds a | lot to the design and development costs. Battery is an unusual | feature but puts it in a different product category. Balancing | that with the audio quality and reliability is not a trivial | problem. Add in wireless, audio drivers (not trivial at ALL), | Complexity increases development time and adds risk to the long | term stability of the product, that is added into the cost. | | Most of the small features feel like somebody there thought it | would be fun and/or easy to put in. It's a good way to iterate | through design ideas, you have to see it in reality. That type of | prototyping isn't easy. Most people don't use 90% of the features | but when you are in a creative industry the 1% that does | absolutely LOVES it and uses it in ways you never expected. It's | difficult to balance the amount of development you put into fun | things vs. business cases. | | If you are trying to figure out why you'd pay for this you aren't | their target market. It's far more interesting (to me) to think | about why some people WOULD pay for this and what a market looks | like that you are not a part of | erichmond wrote: | As an owner of a Rev2 and a P6 really cool to see you here Pym! | briankelly wrote: | > doesn't break | | Can get behind the rest of your comment but I don't think | anyone's ever accused TE of making durable products. To their | credit though, they replaced my broken PO without a fuss, so | I'm not a detractor. | relaxing wrote: | The PO series are a different beast entirely. You can't | compare their $80 toy synths made of PC board to their high | end stuff. | IAmPym wrote: | I have used TE products on occasion and looked into them | deeply from a bunch of engineering perspectives. Compared to | other products in a similar price point and form factor the | likelihood of a problem is far lower. When you reduce the | size you eliminate structural components and if you can't | mill aluminum you're left with a lot of difficult choices to | make to keep things stable. TE does a good job of balancing | those things. | | Customer service is where you see the end result of this. | Replacing things quickly and easily means they aren't | struggling to support bad design decisions in terms of | stability. | briankelly wrote: | Good to know! Very jealous of your line of work, btw, seems | like a great place to be! | thih9 wrote: | Another data point, I own OP-1 and I find it of low | durability, especially for the price. E.g. its knobs, | buttons and jacks seem delicate compared to other gear in | similar price range. | LegitShady wrote: | this has not been my experience with several TE products. | | My experience suggests that TE charges a lot because they | 1) they're a status symbol so they can and 2) they replace | a lot of devices. | | TE to me does not at all signify high quality or 'good | build quality'. Just 'ok' and 'it will likely fail long | before its purchase price justifies itself'. | | They're the pre-intel apple of the synth world - overpriced | and not worth the cost, but status symbols for those who | want them. | prmoustache wrote: | Tell that to all the bent Op-Z owners whose dials pop out | randomly from the case. | hpvic03 wrote: | Hey! While you're here, could you share why the Tempest doesn't | allow you to use your own samples? | | Could you guys open source some parts of Tempest so people | could keep working on it? | | Asking as a Tempest owner and huge Sequential fan. | IAmPym wrote: | Chip/hardware complexity. We actually put some serious | resources into trying to get this to work, wish we could have | made it a reality | | And no, open sourcing would be incredibly difficult to do | with hardware that has multiple chips and requires people to | have expensive programming tools. If it was an ARM you could | just plug a USB cable into that'd be one thing, this just | wouldn't work without a ton of support | | And glad you liked it! I'm quite proud of it all in all | hpvic03 wrote: | Interesting. | | There are those pre-installed samples there already, they | couldn't just be swapped out with an imported file - | there's something special about those files? | | Anyway I think it's hugely underrated, hopefully you guys | can do a v2 sometime. I'm blown away whenever I use it, it | feels like a huge technical achievement. | IAmPym wrote: | Technically they could and that as well was something we | looked into. Honestly it was the most complicated thing | I've ever done. Would love to give it another shot some | day! | nkozyra wrote: | > Design focused - Who is the product for? It isn't for people | who want to spend 250$ on a Behringer mixer. | | Seems like it's competing against the Tascam model line. I have | a model 12 that I'll bet blows it out of the water in the | reliability department at almost half the price. | | It's not as small but it's pretty and rock solid, Tascam has a | great track record (no pun intended) | repiret wrote: | I'm part of a team that makes low volume high priced | electronics. Component costs don't contribute that much: the | price difference between qty 1 and qty 1k is usually much | larger than between qty 1k and anything more. The things I see | contributing to the cost of low quantity hardware are: | | 1. The need to amortize development costs over fewer units. | This is not just software and hardware engineers, but office | space, lab equipment, mechanical engineering for enclosures, | prototype builds, emissions and compliance testing (FCC, CE, | UL, TUV, depending device and on target market) | | 2. Higher manufacturing costs. Low cost overseas manufacturing | has fairly high fixed costs, especially if you want to maintain | high quality. | H1Supreme wrote: | > $250 on a Behringer mixer. | | Yamaha, Mackie, Allen & Heath, Soundcraft, and ART all make | mixers with at least 6 channels on them in the $250 price | range. So, there's more to the mixer landscape than Teenage | Eng. and Behringer. | | I can't comment on all the brands, but I've used Yamaha and | Mackie for years, with virtually zero problems. My old Yamaha | 12 channel (which would retail for $300 today) was an absolute | tank. It did countless shows in dirty warehouses, clubs, | fields, and never even had a road case! Which, I I'd qualify as | pretty reliable. | | > If you are trying to figure out why you'd pay for this you | aren't their target market | | I actually think that I am their target market. I've got many | thousands of dollars worth of eurorack modular (which is the | same niche), synthesizers (including Sequential), guitars, and | studio equipment. I obsess over this stuff, and spend money on | it. | | But, I cannot figure out why I would spend $1200 on this 6 | channel mixer. The Burr Brown ADC? I guess you could argue the | size is the selling point. But, that seems more like a solution | looking for a problem. And, frankly, if you intend to use a | mixer in your performance, the size could do more harm than | good. | wyager wrote: | > Reliable. It is for people who want something that is high | quality and doesn't break. | | My TE OP-1 synth has not really matched these adjectives. | | One of the keyboard keys is misconstructed, so it's on a hair | trigger. The lightest brush will cause it to get set off. I | have to replace the keyboard at some point to fix it. This | should have been caught in QC. | | It also undergoes fairly frequent software crashes (esp. for a | musical instrument). I've crashed it at least 3 times doing | random UI interactions. | | Given that this is one of their flagship products, and a lot of | people use adjectives like "reliable" and "quality" to describe | it, I'm very skeptical that these descriptions are actually | accurate when applied to other TE products. | IAmPym wrote: | Small sample size bias | | Small companies don't have the same QC that a large | corporation does, you'll never get the same consistency | across products at the early stages of a company. Unfair to | compare against that. | | You should definitely contact support and let them know, my | guess is they'll take care of the keyboard. Could be debris | inside it somewhere, could be a number of other tolerance | issues or something else. | | Crashes are definitely a problem. Knowing the chip they use | and the complexity under the hood. The fact is though, all | instruments suffer from issues like this. You will not find a | single piece of gear on the market that doesn't have bugs. | Crash issues are rare in our gear only because they are more | simple by comparison. When I was writing the Tempest OS I had | tons of crash bugs I had to work through because it was | ambitious and quite complex, nearly all of which got fixed as | the OS matured. Same with the OP-1 I'd imagine. | | Professional musicians learn to work around things and create | systems to deal with inevitable problems. It's just the | reality of the game. | DoctorNick wrote: | > Crashes are definitely a problem. Knowing the chip they | use and the complexity under the hood. The fact is though, | all instruments suffer from issues like this. You will not | find a single piece of gear on the market that doesn't have | bugs. Crash issues are rare in our gear only because they | are more simple by comparison. When I was writing the | Tempest OS I had tons of crash bugs I had to work through | because it was ambitious and quite complex, nearly all of | which got fixed as the OS matured. Same with the OP-1 I'd | imagine. | | It's been on the market for TEN YEARS. They have had plenty | of time to defuckulate the software. | IAmPym wrote: | I'm just trying to give you perspective | | Nearly every complex instrument still has critical bugs | after 10 years because development moves on after 4-5 | years. Hardware bugs are != software bugs in terms of | complexity because the debugging and tools you have | available are simply not even close to comparable. This | is why you don't get a whole lot of complex instruments | from small companies. I applaud anyone who gives it a | shot, it isn't easy. | jacquesm wrote: | That's where open sourcing it might come in handy. Oh, | and don't worry about 'hobbyists' not being able to get | their hands on expensive toolchains, that's their problem | once they can get their hands on the source and that's | you holding that back based on the assumption that they | won't be able to do anything with it. | wyager wrote: | > I applaud anyone who gives it a shot, it isn't easy. | | You make it sound like a hobby project and not a $1200 | instrument nominally targeted at professionals. | | The reality is that nothing I do on the OP-1 is very | complicated. It should be a lot more reliable than it is. | Phrodo_00 wrote: | > Unfair to compare against that. | | They're a consumer business, they get to be compared | against other similar businesses. A product's quality | rating shouldn't depend on the size of the company. | blub wrote: | I agree with you mostly about why it would be expensive, but | Teenage Engineering doesn't have a reputation for building | reliable devices. I own an OP-1, owned two POs and considered | getting an OP-Z only to be scared away by all the reports about | poor hardware quality and support. | | The OP-Z plastic casing apparently bends. Sometimes it comes | like that out of the factory (or more likely gets that way | during storage and transport) often times it bends with use. | This means that buttons will slide out of position, keys will | trigger multiple times, etc. | | The manufacturer doesn't have any solution to the above problem | and returning it for a replacement may result in a straight | case or more of the same. All signs indicate that it's a design | defect, but TE haven't recognised this and they're getting | punished in reviews. | | The POs are flimsy, and the knobs tend to be imprecise and | "jump" between values. One came with rust on a metal part | because of TEs creative open packaging which exposes the | devices to the surrounding environment. | | The OP-1 itself seems solid as far as hardware goes so far, but | it has other issues. It's noisy for one, which goes against | claims of audio quality. The software's buggy and it records | clicks together with the incoming audio, especially when | recording external instruments. These are all well known | problems. And given that the OP-1 is supposed to be a synth, or | at least a groovebox, it's surprisingly hard to create good | sounding patches with it. | [deleted] | twobitshifter wrote: | I didn't have the why is it so expensive reaction at all. Mine | was "looks really expensive but maybe it's not", and then | disappointment in the cost. However I totally expected it to | cost around $1000. I don't qualify as anything other than a | noodler so I wouldn't spend that money on it, but as you say | professionals would. | koof wrote: | I've been looking for a tiny mixer with 3 band eq + FX sends | per channel for a while to run synths and/or decks through. | This look like this might fit the bill. The compressor on each | channel is a bonus. I'm not entirely sure if there's | alternative products that would work for me instead, but this | has my attention. | mmastrac wrote: | I bought an OP-1 a few years back and it's done nothing but go up | in value | zasdffaa wrote: | Top 3 rows seem to be dials/knobs to twiddle, is that right? They | are so close together even that female model's hand looks like it | would have trouble grasping one of them without forcing aside the | knobs next to it. AKA they seem very cramped. | [deleted] | PhilipTrauner wrote: | Looks a bit like their cancelled take on Kanye West's stem player | (https://imgur.com/a/ECehY1T), especially those faders on the | front. | whywhywhywhy wrote: | Definitely the design language but doesn't seem to carry over | any of the functionality, just seems like a standard mixer. | seshu_ wrote: | Oh, I just heard of this company and thought to myself that why | are music instruments so expensive, but after reading the | comments I have realised it's the Apple of it's kind. | squarefoot wrote: | Spot on. Their target is rich people who like sleek "different" | design and are willing to pay a big premium for that. | pmags wrote: | Small, portable mixers with lots of stereo inputs are relatively | rare. That plus the Teenage Engineering "tax" (think Apple tax | but for synth-heads) is driving the price. A cheaper, but | slightly less tactile alternative is the 1010 Music Bluebox: | | https://1010music.com/product/bluebox | halfnhalf wrote: | Bluebox doesn't have a digital interface and can only record to | an sd card. USB is only for power :/ | pmags wrote: | Indeed I do occasionally wish the bluebox also acted as an | interface, but I also really like the fact that the Bluebox | is a stand alone recorder (unlike the TX-6). I often don't | want to be sitting in front of a computer when I'm jamming | and making music. | | There are two USB interfaces on the bluebox -- one for power, | the other USB midi devices. | [deleted] | LegitShady wrote: | Most synth heads I know don't like teenage engineering and see | them as overpriced underengineered nerd tech. | | I own an op-z and used to own some pocket operators. They will | be the last teenage engineering products I own. Everything they | release seems more ridiculous all the time. Just the ob-4 is | enough for me to say "these are not products for synth people | but tech nerds who want synths" | elliotlarson wrote: | Yeah, I have a BlueBox and it works great. You can also add | tactility with an external controller like: | https://intech.studio, and you're still in the ballpark of like | half the price of the TE mixer. I mean, I still want one, | though. LOL. | womitt wrote: | I like intech.studio'a approach better | 9999 wrote: | Didn't know about this company and glad to learn about them! I | was actually looking for something exactly like their PO16 | recently and had some PCBs and panels fabbed to make my own (17 | pots for the build I found on lines). | kennywinker wrote: | For everyone drooling over the design of this, here's a fun | little form-over-function tidbit from the fine print: | | > high quality, slimline cables custom-made for TX-6. the narrow | profile allows you to use all 6 channels at once and makes for an | easy pack down. | | Sounds like the input jacks are so close together not every 3.5mm | audio cable will work with it. Like a phone without a headphone | jack - bring a special adaptor or no sounds for you. Lol | jedimastert wrote: | Taking a look at a pic of the back the jacks look to be about | 3mm apart, which seems fine for most 3.5mm straight jack | cables. What I'm betting is that most people don't have 6 3.5mm | to 3.5mm cables, given that most boards and interfaces take | 1/4" | kennywinker wrote: | 3mm of space only leaves room for 1.5mm of extra radius per | cable. I just eyeballed my cable drawer and I only saw one | kind that might fit next to each other with that little | clearance. It's gonna be a pain... not a huge pain, but a | pain nonetheless. idk why they couldn't just add a little | extra width and avoid the pain with most cables. Especially | since what you'll need most of the time isn't going to be the | 1/8" to 1/8" cables they're going to give you - but 1/4" to | 1/8" cables - since most instruments have 1/4" outputs | MisterSandman wrote: | To be fair, 3.5mm and 1/4" are virtually equivalent ports, | and the only reason 1/4" is used for audio interfaces is | because of convention (and probably because it's easier to | grab). Converters between them should be dirt cheap. | | It's not like Apple shipping 2022 iPhones with Lightning v/s | USB C | eternityforest wrote: | Converters are an issue when the whole point is small size. | | I wish they'd develop a full USB-C alternate mode for pro | audio. | | One C cable could do dozens of channels, or one of legacy | analog, and provide clean regulated power for wireless | gear, and the connectors pack very densely. | | You could even make it daisy chainable, plus speakers could | be powered over PD at small shows, and so could lights. | relaxing wrote: | At 0.5mm pitch between connectors the crosstalk would be | nasty. | postexitus wrote: | yes, but you can use non-adjascent ports with standard 3.5mm | audio cables - if you are that bothered, assume it's a 3 | channel board with an option to upgrade to 6 if you buy the | special cables. | kennywinker wrote: | Did you just "You're holding it wrong" me? :) | | They could have brilliantly designed their way out of that by | making the whole thing ~1.5cm wider (3mm extra five times). | | A zoom h6 is a well designed portable battery powered mixer / | audio interface with 4 easily accessible inputs and two that | might need an adaptor depending on your cabling. It also | comes with two high quality microphones, and records without | being tethered to another device. For $409 | [deleted] | azornathogron wrote: | 3 channels for the price of 6 is still a terrible deal. | aidenn0 wrote: | It's Teenage Engineering, so more like the price of 8 or | 12. Also, no balanced inputs. | kennywinker wrote: | Balanced inputs are useful for cancelling noise in long | cable runs. There are no long cable runs if your target | audience is people making aesthetic 60s instagram videos | of their "synth jam in nature" with $2000 of gear in shot | and $2000 more to film it. | sparker72678 wrote: | Darn. I saw TRRS and assumed balance mono inputs. | nathanvanfleet wrote: | lol | relaxing wrote: | Can't believe no one's said if you're spending $1200 bucks on | this thing, you can probably drop $60 on some cables. | tpmx wrote: | Can anyone identify the manufacturer of the beautiful knurled | knobs? | | I only know about Kilo International in Orem, Utah | (http://www.kilointernational.com/) in this space. They don't | look like any of their standard parts. | unwind wrote: | They state that they have "custom encoders", and in such | marketing text that might well mean custom encoder _knobs_. | ruined wrote: | at that price, they could be custom. and looking at the | geometry they could be made any place doing contract c&c. | tpmx wrote: | Yeah, that's probably the case. I guess that's part of their | DNA - do the design first, without really thinking about | what's already out there. (But with a firm view on what's | possible to custom make.) | [deleted] | simonjgreen wrote: | Me looking at the new Teenage Engineering TX-6: "Mmmhmmm, yep, | yep, like, yep, that's beautiful, I think I'll probably... OH MY | GOD HOW MUCH" ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-21 23:00 UTC)