[HN Gopher] How Polyester Bounced Back ___________________________________________________________________ How Polyester Bounced Back Author : mhb Score : 37 points Date : 2022-04-21 19:33 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.worksinprogress.co) (TXT) w3m dump (www.worksinprogress.co) | dvh wrote: | Any fellow European remembers Dederon fabric? | mr3martinis wrote: | Great article on the history of performance fabrics. The last bit | leaves me wanting to learn more about innovations to make them | more environmentally friendly. | | From my own experience, the tendency for polyester to be smellier | than natural fibers relegates it to my workout clothes. Most of | the time I'm wearing cotton. | PKop wrote: | A huge source of micro-plastics [0][1]. My wife and I have | attempted to cut out as many plastic sources in our household we | have to come into contact with, including switching away from | polyester clothing to cotton, linen and wool where possible. | | From article: "A polyester textile is the same PET material | (polyethylene terephthalate) as a plastic soda bottle, only | extruded into a filament rather than molded into a container. | Like the bottle, the fiber repels water. It's hydrophobic. That's | a nice quality in a fleece jacket but a sweat-trapping horror | against the skin. To reach its performance potential, polyester | needed not simply to keep out moisture but to move it. | | 'The body is really fussy. It doesn't like hot, humid conditions | right at skin level. Move that humidity a millimeter away and | it's a whole different ballgame', explains Randy Harward, who | spent more than 40 years developing products and materials in the | outdoor apparel industry. Once off the skin, moisture becomes a | valuable buffer against wind and chill. In hot weather, it can | evaporate and keep you cool. The trick is getting it to that | sweet spot." | | Yea, no thanks. For weightlifting and running, switching to 100% | cotton shorts from Bonobos and Chubbies feels much better, | lighter weight, cooler, and less sweaty and harsh on my skin than | polyester synthetic material. In addition to the concern I have | for potential endocrine disrupting properties of plastics, | there's already so many plastics we are exposed to on a daily | basis I'd rather not have them directly against my body and skin | throughout the day. | | [0] | https://www.technologynetworks.com/immunology/news/microplas... | | [1] https://www.naturalclothing.com/what-is-polyester-fabric/ | riversflow wrote: | >> For many people. . .the polymer is the worst form of | planetary pollution since oil spills. Some of that attitude is | cultural snobbery, a marker of class allegiance not that | different from Ralph Lauren eschewing synthetics in the early | '80s. | | There it is! HN cant help itself. I love that one of the | citations is literally "naturalclothing.com" that seems like a | very neutral source. | | > Yeah, no thanks. | | I mean you are entitled to the subjective opinion about how | comfortable cotton is to work out in, but the objective reality | of the mass market is that polyester is hugely popular as a | technical fabric. I go backpacking and cotton essential doesn't | exist in the back country, everyone is either sporting wool or | synthetics. Wet cotton is cold, rough and doesn't breathe. I | love high performance natural fibers, and own a lot of wool and | down, but I'd be lying if I didn't say that polyester has | advantages over wool (less so down). | | Is there _any_ evidence that plastic can enter our body | transdermally? I find it extremely unlikely and honestly quite | far-fetched given everything I know about the skin. | silisili wrote: | It doesn't have to enter transdermally...we just breathe it | in! The stuff sheds microplastics just in normal wear... | | https://www.inputmag.com/style/microfibers-clothes- | fashion-p... | twobitshifter wrote: | Speaking of polyester for athletics, I have not found that | they've eliminated the problem of the shirt trapping odor. I | have some golf and workout shirts that are absurdly comfortable | but smell when they come clean from the laundry. I don't | perspire that much but the odor seems to get worse the longer I | own the shirt. | sizzle wrote: | What about rayon? | EL_Loco wrote: | Endocrine disruption (potential) of plastics in constant | contact with skin is something I sometimes worry about, more | for my kids than myself, but I'd like to ask anybody more | knowledgeable if it really makes a difference: aren't cotton | and polyester both dyed with synthetic dyes/paints, and that's | ultimately what's in contact with our bodies? If this is a | source of endocrine disruption, won't cotton affect me just the | same? Wouldn't I have to wear undyed, natural color cotton to | make a difference? | jbotz wrote: | Just because something is "synthetic" doesn't mean it's | toxic. Plastics, or rather the additives used to make | plastics soft, flexible, water-repellent, etc., are now known | to have a specific set of toxic (or endocrine disrupting) | effects on biological systems. Other synthetic substances may | have none, or different ones. Textile dyes don't contain any | endocrine disrupters as far as I know, but they certainly | might have other ingredients that aren't very good for you. | Also, some bioactive substances may be easily absorbed by the | body, others not. There's a lot about all this that we just | don't know. | | Personally I'm not very worried about absorbing endocrine | disrupters through the skin from clothes, but I avoid | polyester clothes because a) I don't like the way they feel | on my skin, and b) because of the environmental effects | (washing them creates micro-plastic pollution, and eventually | they become plastic trash). | | But it should be pointed out that cotton is also an | environmental villain... in cotton agriculture huge amounts | of herbicides and pesticides are used, even more than for | most other crops. And even if the dyes don't have any | significant effect on the health of the wearer, the process | of dying textiles produces lots of environmental toxins and | probably isn't good for the health of the people working in | that industry. | | So in relation to the environment and polyester vs cotton | you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. The one | thing you _can_ do is consume less... keep clothes longer, | mend them whenever at all possible, or just go full naturist! | ;-) | decasteve wrote: | > including switching away from polyester clothing to cotton, | linen and wool where possible. | | I've been going through the same thing lately. My daughter had | offered to show me how to naturally dye and sew my own clothes | if I get the undyed fabric. I'm eager to take her up on that. | ghaff wrote: | In the outdoor activities space advances in materials have really | been revolutionary (and not just clothing). When I first started | doing winter hiking and related activities seriously in the early | 90s, I was definitely in the natural fibers camp including | wearing cotton when it seemed reasonable to do so. | | These days? I even wear polyester around the house in winter most | of the time. (Merino wool is actually my go to a lot of the time | --albeit more expensive and more delicate. I wear a lot of cotton | Ts in the warmer months however.) | | There's also been a real revolution in lightweight packs, tents, | etc. More broadly. It's all much better than two or three decades | ago. | | Malden Mills is also (only something of) a feel-good story. The | owner kept paying salaries and rebuilt after a very bad fire in | the late nineties and received a lot of praise at the time. | However the company went bankrupt a few years later partly as a | result. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | > Unlike wool or cotton, polyester resists rather than absorbs | water. | | This is actually wrong and misleadingly glorifies poliester. | | Wool does not absorb water, wool _adsorbs_ water and this makes | all the difference in the world. | | For instance a jacket made from Burel Wool would need hours of | continous deluge before ever getting you wet on the inside. | pc486 wrote: | It's not like polyester resists forever either. Many outdoors | folk have experienced "wet out." Resistance only goes so far | and I'd rather wear wet wool than wet polyester. | | Synthetics are still great though. They have many other | benefits and are easy enough to avoid soaking through. | Infernal wrote: | Many synthetics have a PFOA or PFOS treatment to provide the | water resistance, which are pretty terrible chemicals when | you end up exposed to them all day on your clothing. They | also wear off rapidly with normal use, so previously water- | resistant clothing loses that property after a few months to | a year depending on how often it is worn and washed. | derbOac wrote: | Often "natural" means cotton, but I'm fed up with it. It's often | poorly made and doesn't last long, or takes forever to dry, or | holds onto moisture too long otherwise. | | Polyester just lasts so much longer, even in a blend. | | I've gotten to a point where I prefer wool, synthetics, linen, or | hemp. Some cotton garments I love but for the most part I'd be | happy without any 100% cotton fabric. | aidenn0 wrote: | I used to love wool, but the place we moved to seems to attract | carpet beetles; they are back within a year of fumigation. | Essentially all of my woolen clothing has holes in it now. | derbOac wrote: | Yeah that's a downside of wool for sure. We've dealt with | similar wool-eating insects and it's no fun. I hope you are | able to get the problem resolved. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-21 23:01 UTC)