[HN Gopher] When Americans dreamed of kitchen computers (2021) ___________________________________________________________________ When Americans dreamed of kitchen computers (2021) Author : redshirt Score : 29 points Date : 2022-04-21 12:14 UTC (4 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.atlasobscura.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.atlasobscura.com) | [deleted] | yazantapuz wrote: | It is very, very hard to predict the future. | mtoddsmith wrote: | We have the google nest hub in our kitchen and use it for | recipes, weather, Wikipedia or "kid questions" and news / | YouTube, music and intercom. I just wish apple had the same since | I'm on iPhone and now to pause and think is it "hey Siri" or "hey | google". Can I make google respond to " hey Siri"? | kwertyoowiyop wrote: | That "1956 kitchen of tomorrow" is still gorgeous and futuristic. | jdontillman wrote: | 'Looks remarkably similar to The Simpsons' kitchen. | joshstrange wrote: | I mean I have a dedicated iPad Mini 2 in my kitchen that I use | Paprika [0] on, that feels pretty much in line with what was | predicted (I don't do my calendaring or taxes on it but still). I | know I'm far from alone in having this setup, multiple friends | and family members use the same thing. Even growing up we had an | older laptop in the kitchen for looking up recipes and the like | (though that was very much so an outlier among my friends and | their parents at that time). | | [0] https://www.paprikaapp.com/ | samsolomon wrote: | Fantastic app suggestion! I've been manually copying and | pasting recipes I liked into Notion so they are all largely | formatted the same--the download recipe functionality in | Paprika is magic. | joshstrange wrote: | I'm a huge fan of Paprika, their app is slick, they have apps | on iOS/Android/Mac/Windows, and it all syncs. They have a ton | of features under the hood that I don't even use (like meal | planning, pantry management, etc) but I do love their | shopping list feature. Just click the shopping cart icon on a | recipe and it will let you add all the ingredients to one of | your lists. You can easily uncheck all the things you already | have and it respects recipe scaling and it will combine | ingredients (so if one recipe has 2 tomatoes and you scale it | 2x and then another recipe has 3 tomatoes and you leave it at | 1x you will end up with 7 tomatoes on your list). Sometimes | you need to clean up a recipe a little bit (brand name in the | ingredient list or odd naming) but the nice part is you do | that once then reap the benefits for forever. | | Also, if you are feeling froggy, their cloud sync API is | pretty easy to reverse engineer (it's a super basic REST | service) so you can build on top of it or write little | utilities if needed. | | Having all my recipes in the same format is so nice and I can | edit a recipe if I want to tweak it or if I find out that | what a recipe called for wasn't quite right. Like the icing I | make for my red velvet cupcakes called for an insane amount | of powered sugar (aka confectioners sugar) and so I edited | the recipe so next time I wouldn't over-buy the sugar. Same | with tweaking the flavor profile, cook times, etc. And I can | add things I always have to look up like sous vide temp/time, | I just have a "Sous Vide Steak" "recipe" that has the times | in the body of the instructions. | sammalloy wrote: | This sounds great, and I'm ready to download the app, but | the problem is that most of my recipes come from Facebook | groups, YouTube, Insta, and Pinterest, and while some of | them have corresponding web pages for the ingredients | lists, many of them do not, which would make the web import | feature non-functional, if I'm not mistaken. I wish there | was a way all of these sites could share metadata for | ingredients that the app could read. | | Another future feature that would be nice and convenient is | to add in-house aisle shopping directions to the smart | grocery lists for selected (or default) grocery stores. I | know stores like Safeway share this info with apps like | DoorDash (possibly UberEats as well), and both Home Depot | and Target apps have aisle by aisle directions too, so it's | not beyond the realm of the possible to include this | feature. Being able to view a smart grocery list in my | kitchen and then to go to the store with aisle by aisle | directions is a dream of mine. | TYPE_FASTER wrote: | I remember the first time I read "The Veldt" by Ray Bradbury. | john_the_writer wrote: | I watched the movie Demon Seed when I was young. Any one who | wants a smart home should spend the time, and watch this. I | suspect they'd change their mind. | oh_sigh wrote: | You're afraid your smart home device is going to kidnap and | impregnate you? | kwertyoowiyop wrote: | It can't even stay connected to my wifi for more than a few | days! | jaywalk wrote: | You're not? | oh_sigh wrote: | I've been following teledildonics since the early 90s, and | unfortunately I can say we're a long way away from that. | blamazon wrote: | In my kitchen my Google home unit is a very advanced timer, unit | conversion device, and picture frame. | johnmarcus wrote: | and by "Americans", you mean "large corporations with wares to | sell." | kps wrote: | The article's "Honeywell, an early computer-maker that would | later help power the Arpanet" is a journalistically muddled | version of a more specific fact: the 'Kitchen Computer' was a | Honeywell 316 in a pedestal case, and the 316 was also used for | the ARPANET Interface Message Processor (i.e. router). | markus_zhang wrote: | I love those retro future photos! | chihuahua wrote: | The article has a link to a video about Moley Robotic's $338,000 | robotic kitchen. It's quite eye-opening, because the robot | appears to be a pair of arms/hands which can grab mise-en-place | containers of ingredients, dump them into a saucepan, and stir | them painfully slowly. I wonder: | | - who peels and chops the vegetables etc that go into those | containers? | | - who cleans up the pots and utensils when the robot is done | stirring and heating the food? | | Ideally there would be another $300,000 robot for each of those | two tasks, but I suspect the answer is that your (human) | housekeeper is needed. | | The video is worth watching just to laugh at how unbelievably | slowly this $338,000 marvel is at stirring the contents of a | saucepan. | | The elevator pitch for Moley could be "Juicero, but for pasta" | chazeon wrote: | Before opening this article I sure expect something like a | computer in the kitchen, which for some people is the iMac 24 and | for me it have been iPad Pro 12.9 + Magic Keyboard for 3 yrs. | Surprised to see it was something like a cooking robot. | vel0city wrote: | I think its interesting to see these ideas just be unable to | predict the true scale of miniaturization of personal computing. | They still saw the kitchen computer as some kind of appliance or | something built-in to the home. Meanwhile most of us do have | kitchen computers; a ton of people look to their phones or | tablets for many of the tasks these early kitchen computers were | planned to do. Keeping track of meals, providing recipes, keeping | track of inventories, ordering groceries and meals, etc. is all | commonly done with kitchen computers these days. | | Its just we don't call them kitchen computers. We call them | smartphones and tablets, and they're even more embedded in our | lives than many of these 1970s futurists could even imagine. | | And yet at the same time we're still nearly as far off from truly | completely automating the kitchen. I still don't have a machine | that I walk up to and it can make me a wide variety of meals with | little to no interaction on my part. | zozbot234 wrote: | The flip side of that argument is that the home computers of | the 1970s and 1980s (the only computery things that would've | been priced comparably to a household appliance) had only tiny | amounts of storage available to them (and even that storage was | highly impractical for sustained use) - they really were little | more than glorified desk calculators. So the widely imagined | uses in the kitchen or for other sorts of household management | tasks could not realistically pan out before the price of | modern computers started to slowly drop down in the mid-1990s. | Of course the Internet took over not long after, and we all got | used to things like looking up recipes on the Web. So there's | that, too. | zwieback wrote: | Exactly. I've worked in manufacturing automation long enough to | know that the equipment needed to generate the huge variety of | food even a mediocre cook can prepare would fill multiple | kitchens. Automation equipment that's safe and reliable tends | to be very big in relation to the items it operates on. | jandrese wrote: | One could imagine something like an industrial robot arm that | can swap implements being able to manage a relatively large | variety of recipes given some staple ingredients in a limited | amount of space, but it would be tremendously complex to | build and cost more than an industrial robot arm. Keeping it | clean and well maintained would be a nontrivial effort, even | if the arm includes programming to clean up after itself. | | Probably like a billion dollars to develop the first | prototype, and each copy would be in the hundreds of | thousands of dollars range, maybe eeking down into the tens | of thousands of dollars range if they work really well and | become inexplicably popular. Even then it would be up to the | customer to keep it stocked with ingredients in a specially | designed containers in the included pantry and refrigerator. | | It's really the same reason McDonalds never really went | through with that fully automated restaurant threat. A person | can do the same job for minimum wage, so the robot will never | be cost efficient unless someone else does all of the R&D for | you, and even then it's highly dependent on being low | maintenance. | zwieback wrote: | Articulated robot arm sounds like the most flexible | solution. Trickiest part here would be safety - any robot | with the power to chop, grind, cut would also have to have | a good safety system or be enclosed. | | Right now I'm thinking about tasks I don't enjoy: chopping | onions, peeling carrots or potatoes, anything where I have | to touch meat. All those would require very advanced | sensing. Come to think it, that last one brings up the | important topic of food safety and sanitation, the whole | thing would have to be able to withstand a washdown. | drewzero1 wrote: | Not to mention the risk of fire if something goes wrong | in the cooking process. (Or, less directly, the risk of | getting sick from improperly-cooked food.) | mumblemumble wrote: | I'm thinking here of ill-fated robot kitchen startup Zume's | pizza robots. You can probably still find videos of them in | operation on YouTube. The things that most struck me when I | watched one were how _slow_ they are at what they do, how | much space they took up, and how much human intervention | they required to operate. | zwieback wrote: | I think this is a general pattern: since the beginning of the | industrial revolution people have been dreaming about robots | doing things for us, replacing entire tasks. The reality is that | putting computers into existing devices makes a lot more sense as | mechanical household devices are already highly optimized. Sewing | machines, kitchen appliances, cars, power tools are the result of | decades of engineering so we replace the control systems and user | interfaces with microcontrollers but leave the good stuff as-is. | | Self-driving cars is one area where I could see a bigger shift: a | dangerous activity that could perhaps be done better by machines, | if the environment is adapted to prevent show-stopping accidents. | tuatoru wrote: | > activity that could perhaps be done better by machines, if | the environment is adapted to prevent show-stopping accidents. | | Like Roombas. No pets, children, floorstanding houseplants, | rugs, clothes left on the floor, etc. | | For self-driving cars: no non-powered vehicles or pedestrians, | no variant uses of the road, no road surface problems. | ryukafalz wrote: | > if the environment is adapted to prevent show-stopping | accidents | | And what exactly would that environment look like to those | outside of a car? | zwieback wrote: | lots of guardrails! | trgn wrote: | Slower speeds hoepfully. Imagine golf carts tottering | around the city. That's the automated driving of the | future. Not the current mad max roads, but with robots. | Instead, some florida retiree town, but with robots. | retrac wrote: | > since the beginning of the industrial revolution people have | been dreaming about robots doing things for us | | The dream is much older than that, I suspect. There are | references to self-weaving looms, self-playing musical organs, | self-grinding mills in classical literature, often in | descriptions of some sort of idealized utopia or afterlife. But | I think some in antiquity would have considered them quite | possible in this life, if only their construction and the | underlying principles were understood. That work, in the | physics sense, can captured and redirected by machinery is an | ancient realization. Around 20 AD a Greek poet (Antipater of | Thessalonica) made a passing reference to how machines had | already freed people from the toil of grinding grain by | harnessing nature's power: | | > Hold back your hand from the mill, you grinding girls; even | if the cockcrow heralds the dawn, sleep on. For Demeter has | imposed the labours of your hands on the nymphs, who leaping | down upon the topmost part of the wheel, rotate its axle; with | encircling cogs, it turns the hollow weight of the Nisyrian | millstones. If we learn to feast toil-free on the fruits of the | earth, we taste again the golden age. | zwieback wrote: | Wonderful, from now on I'll be imagining nymphs powering | anything that moves on its own. Thanks, Demeter! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-25 23:01 UTC)