[HN Gopher] Compostable fungi-based replacement for styrofoam
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Compostable fungi-based replacement for styrofoam
        
       Author : gruuya
       Score  : 107 points
       Date   : 2022-04-26 11:05 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.soma.eco)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.soma.eco)
        
       | brink wrote:
       | > 04 - Reduce cost for packaging
       | 
       | So it's cheaper? By how much?
        
         | machinerychorus wrote:
         | Probably by an order of magnitude if you factor in all the
         | externalities. Unfortunately, those externalities probably
         | won't make a difference on the sticker price.
        
         | formvoltron wrote:
         | Obviously that's not the point.
        
           | levitate wrote:
           | It's a pretty big point, if you want your product to get
           | picked up by margin-focused corporations.
        
       | ruc0la wrote:
       | Composting emits CO2
        
         | cmrdporcupine wrote:
         | If you're doing it right and using it as soil ammendment, a
         | portion remains in the soil, building up the soil humus. In the
         | long run it can be carbon negative.
         | 
         | I could see making something like this from food waste and then
         | just burying it in the ground.
        
         | danans wrote:
         | CO2 that was sequestered from the atmosphere. That's very
         | different than CO2 in polystyrene which is fossil fuel derived.
        
         | hristov wrote:
         | It emits no more CO2 than the thing being composted soaked up
         | when growing. So it will emit less than the amount the
         | mushrooms absorbed. This is the cycle of life. This is not a
         | problem.
         | 
         | The problem is when you emit CEO that has been absorbed over
         | hundreds of millions of years and fossilized in oil and gas all
         | within 100 years or so.
        
           | yakubin wrote:
           | _> The problem is when you emit CEO that has been absorbed
           | over hundreds of millions of years and fossilized in oil and
           | gas all within 100 years or so._
           | 
           | This typo made my day.
        
       | daenz wrote:
       | Very cool. I'm convinced that as innovators start taking climate
       | change more seriously, we're going to see incredible new products
       | and processes. I'm sure it won't be enough to quell the death
       | cult hysteria, but will make a huge impact in course correction.
        
       | fnordpiglet wrote:
       | I for one welcome our new Biosporin overlords.
        
       | _dain_ wrote:
       | i hate and distrust fungi. sinister organisms. don't turn your
       | back on them.
        
         | pampa wrote:
         | All fungi are edible! Tho some you can eat only once.
        
           | tandr wrote:
           | To think of it - we are a food for fungi too!
        
         | dmje wrote:
         | We should definitely watch out. There's not mushroom on this
         | planet.
        
       | timeon wrote:
       | I wonder if there is something like this also for building
       | insulation.
        
       | Digerron wrote:
       | cool
        
       | pampa wrote:
       | Once i had an idea: instead of styrofoam or packing peanuts just
       | use pop corn or puff rice. Thermal insulation, shock absorbent
       | and biodegradable! Not sure about flame resistant. Also reusable.
       | Make a mash, add some amylase and yeast and you can distill
       | biofuel. Win-win.
       | 
       | EDIT: (fungal aspect) seed it with the right spores for container
       | shipping and you get some free penicillin upon delivery!
        
         | elefantastisch wrote:
         | It seems like it would be impossible to prevent bugs and
         | rodents from getting into packages in facilities that process
         | packages if there was this much free food available.
        
           | Broken_Hippo wrote:
           | This is the main issue with things like popcorn and other
           | foodstuffs: Insects and other pests truly love it. Suddenly,
           | you have an insect problem in places that don't have food.
        
         | w-j-w wrote:
        
         | Biganon wrote:
         | I've had stuff delivered to me packed with actual pop corn.
         | Don't remember what it was, but a small object.
        
         | _jal wrote:
         | My mother ran a small herb business (medicinal plants that
         | weren't illegal at the time, to be clear) a long time ago. She
         | also sold tincture bottles and other related things, and
         | shipped things in popcorn.
         | 
         | She was careful about bugs and rodents and such, and provided a
         | "what's this about" note in the box that also had suggestions
         | for what to do with it, but it still seemed to weird some
         | people out. Maybe people are more open to stuff like this now.
         | 
         | Her shop was very small. I suspect bugs, etc. would be
         | problematic for anyone doing volume.
        
         | legulere wrote:
         | Packing peanuts are often made out of corn starch. The problem
         | is how the packaging comes from the receiver to a sensible use.
        
       | Digerron wrote:
       | nicw
        
       | selfsimilar wrote:
       | I'm heartened by the interest in better packaging and it seems
       | like it's having a moment. Last week Cruz Foam[0] (probably a
       | direct competitor) had an announcement that it had some celebrity
       | investors[1]. It's probably not a popular opinion but I think
       | adding more regulations or incentives (tax breaks) to discourage
       | the use of non-biodegradable packaging, especially in foods, is
       | long overdue.
       | 
       | [0] - https://www.cruzfoam.com [1] -
       | https://www.cruzfoam.com/post/meet-our-new-investors-advisor...
        
         | bluSCALE4 wrote:
         | Yeah, we have incentives to insulate homes but they all use
         | terrible tech. The best solution still off-gases and can be
         | dangerous if done improperly.
        
           | selfsimilar wrote:
           | Home insulation has a longer useful life than most packaging,
           | but you're right that it still usually ends up in a landfill.
           | However the current incentives for home insulation are very
           | different - usually to reduce home heating/cooling costs and
           | reduced energy consumption is usually an environmentally
           | sound policy. Should there be further incentives to encourage
           | insulation alternatives which have a more eco-friendly end of
           | life? Absolutely. And that is likely a harder problem given
           | the productive lifetime of an average home, but definitely a
           | worthy place to also put further incentives.
        
             | myshpa wrote:
             | I think one of the solutions may be based on hemp,
             | currently known as hempcrete or hemp concrete - essentially
             | a mix of hemp hurd (the woody essence of the hemp plant),
             | hydraulic lime, and water.
             | 
             | You mix it up and then all you need is just the wooden
             | frame (if you're building load bearing walls), then you
             | wrap it in hempcrete (floors, walls & roof), apply some mud
             | plaster and you're done. No need for 6-10 layers full of
             | plastics & glues.
             | 
             | Thanks to use of lime instead of cement the building even
             | captures CO2, as the walls literally turn into stone over
             | time.
             | 
             | Some hemp buildings are 200+ years old, in some cave in
             | india they've even found 1500 y.o. hempcrete, and you can
             | compost whole building at EOL.
             | 
             | Some other benefits: non-toxic, no off-gassing, no
             | solvents, mold resistance, high vapor permeability,
             | humidity control, durable, sustainable, carbon
             | sequestration, fire and pest resistance, passive self
             | regulation of temperature and humidity, great insulator
        
           | zionic wrote:
           | Look up "zip system 2.0 Matt Risinger" on YouTube.
           | 
           | Seems like the best available today.
        
             | danans wrote:
             | Zip system sheathing, while great, is not enough. You still
             | need either cavity wall insulation or exterior insulation
             | or both.
             | 
             | For cavity wall insulation, dense packed cellulose is a
             | carbon negative option currently widely available.
        
         | balaji1 wrote:
         | what is the toxicity of these compostable materials to humans
         | and animals? Also do we understand long-term health impacts?
         | 
         | Though these shouldn't be worse than the plastic/styrofoam that
         | is so prevalent today.
        
       | sbeckeriv wrote:
       | can i eat it?
        
         | gruuya wrote:
         | Funny enough, my initial impression was that it looks tasty as
         | it reminded me of Camembert cheese.
        
       | jl6 wrote:
       | What kind of products could you package using this material that
       | you couldn't package in cardboard?
        
       | formvoltron wrote:
       | Cool looks kind of like tempeh.
        
       | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
       | Looks like tempeh. Can you eat it?
        
       | ozten wrote:
       | How long does it take to grow one unit? How much space does that
       | unit take up during growth? How stable is the product before use?
       | 
       | Very cool stuff, my take-away from reading about earlier fungi-
       | base packaging is that it is hard to scale in a cost effective
       | way. I've grown oyster mushroom "leather" which was fun, but took
       | about 6 weeks for a 3" diameter.
        
       | desireco42 wrote:
       | It is wonderful but in the past these could not be produced in
       | large quantities enough to be actually used as packaging. It
       | takes long to grow fungi and not all succeed.
       | 
       | In general happy that business are going this way.
        
       | voakbasda wrote:
       | Interesting, but growing fungi requires large amounts of water,
       | yet this resource has been omitted this input from their "impact"
       | diagram. At scale, the "manufacturing" process for this product
       | likely will require an insane amount of fresh, clean water. With
       | potable water already a constrained resource in many areas, how
       | big can a single factory be scaled before running afoul of their
       | local community?
        
         | jmhobbs wrote:
         | Does it if you're not fruiting them though? I make 5lb hardwood
         | sawdust bags with about a quart, quart and a half of water, and
         | that's all that is needed for the mycelium to colonize the
         | whole thing. I suppose at scale a liter for a 12"x6"x6" block
         | is perhaps a bit much lot.
        
         | drewm1980 wrote:
         | Hobby gourmet mushroom grower here. For gourmet mushrooms you
         | use about 60 percent water. For this purpose it is probably
         | lower. Many products require many times their weight in water;
         | this is not that bad. Mushrooms care more about competing
         | bacteria and fungi than impurities... I imagine pasteurized
         | groundwater or rainwater would be good enough for this. Drying
         | and killing the mycelium could be energy intensive depending on
         | the local climate. Maybe they recapture most of the water
         | during the bake... It would already be sterile.
        
       | ents wrote:
       | Doesn't this already exist from Ecovative?
       | https://www.ecovative.com/pages/packaging
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-28 23:00 UTC)