[HN Gopher] E Ink Gallery 3 ___________________________________________________________________ E Ink Gallery 3 Author : retSava Score : 298 points Date : 2022-04-28 12:53 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.eink.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.eink.com) | hemreldop wrote: | cycomanic wrote: | There is also the technology used by the reinkstone.com. The big | advantage is that they can turn color on and off, without getting | the reduced contrast that eink gets. That said they just delayed | their delivery to autumn I believe, so likely they have issues | with production consistency or so. It's still not comparable to a | proper color display, but I wouldnt mind one of these for readi g | papers, where I can switch to color for graphs etc. It would also | make highlighting etc much nicer. | ortusdux wrote: | Apparently I should have included "(Rollable)" in the title! | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31167290 | cubefox wrote: | You shouldn't have, including it in the title is misleading | here. As I said before, the rollability is not the innovation | here. | ortusdux wrote: | It gets results though. | spaniard89277 wrote: | Somwhere around 3000 AC I'll get a laptop with color eink :/ | mdp2021 wrote: | Get e.g. a SC1452-GHA 7.8'' Kaleido (btw with frontlight and | touchscreen) and hook it to a laptop through the development | kit, or get a device mounting it and connect to it through VNC | or better. Maybe the dev-kit is better than a remote desktop | session, maybe not: further info about it would be needed. | | I have worked on 8'' (not a Kaleido) and it's very doable if | you accept the real estate compromise. | | You can have it already and spend maybe around 200u, plus your | time to set it up. | ushakov wrote: | what does it cost and do they sell individual pieces? | solarkraft wrote: | They sell development kits at https://shopkits.eink.com/ under | a funny condition: | | > PURCHASER IS PURCHASING THE PRODUCTS FOR COMMERCIAL USE | AND/OR IN A BUSINESS CAPACITY. ORDERS PLACED BY CONSUMERS WILL | NOT BE ACCEPTED | mschuster91 wrote: | Jesus, that pricing. 99$ for a single panel and 350$ for the | accompanying driver board which is essentially a small MCU | and a couple MOSFETs? | throw10920 wrote: | Sounds like a ripe opportunity for developing an open- | source driver board! | abraxas wrote: | So we have a 21st century scroll? Another 2 millennia before eInk | launches a codex version? | JKCalhoun wrote: | Yeah, I might be stupid, but is there anyone clamoring to fold | their displays? | | Like flexible solar panels, I suspect 1) engineering tradeoffs, | 2) shorter longevity (would that just be brevity?). | dmix wrote: | One thing that hasn't changed over the years is E-Ink never | hiring a web designer to sell their products. | tpmx wrote: | It's the explicit letter-spacing in the CSS that makes the | English language site look really odd. I suppose they add it to | make the Chinese/etc variants of the site look better. | | It's a Taiwanese company. | dmix wrote: | The mobile version of the blog is all over the place as well. | xwdv wrote: | I just want to run my vim terminal on an E-Ink screen. | pangaurdian wrote: | i think you can do it on an Onyx ereader with a vim terminal | android app. For sure, I've run Vim on an Onyx with a BT | keyboard. Worked ok. Not sure about a full blown vim terminal. | I know the apps exist on playstore. | goldcd wrote: | https://dasung-tech.myshopify.com/products/dasung-25-3-e-ink... | dotancohen wrote: | Onyx is planning on shipping another 25" monitor next month, | that's about 15% cheaper: | | https://onyxboox.com/boox_mirapro | | The problem is that it states "Windows, MacOS, Android and | iOS operating systems" are supported. The Dasung specifically | states that they support Linux, so that's probably the one | that I'll order anyway despite the price. | adisbladis wrote: | https://github.com/leoluk/paperlike-go/ also exists for the | Dasung and is FOSS. | solarkraft wrote: | There are many ways to do this, either fiddly or a little | expensive. You can | | - use a Dasung screen or Boox Max with your desktop (expensive, | plug and play) | | - use a hacked-up Linux e-reader (super cheap, fiddly) | | - build something with WaveShare kits and an Arduino/Raspberry | Pi (moderately expensive and fiddly, but allows for interesting | creations) | | - use some app (Termux) on an Android E-Reader (Boox, | moderately expensive, quite versatile). | | The tech is a bit inaccessible, but not as much as it may seem. | Just check out: https://hackaday.com/tag/e-ink/ | throw10920 wrote: | Here's someone doing Emacs on a ReMarkable 2 through SSH: | https://twitter.com/ianthehenry/status/1481376985129500679 | xwdv wrote: | At the very least I think I'd need 16 color support though | for syntax highlighting, in order for it to be practical. | thrown12 wrote: | I have a number of Dasung products and the results are | spectacular. I can code for hours on end with no eye strain and | my sleeping schedule is normal for the first time in 15 years. | The lack of flashiness on the screen also lets me think more | about what I'm doing. | retSava wrote: | Slightly edited title to emphasize that this epaper is rollable. | Videos on that link. | keikobadthebad wrote: | The color updates are about 10x faster, and there's a 300ms | black / white update mode too. | nicoburns wrote: | Is 300ms fast? I thought Remarkable and similar products had | it down to 40ms. | keikobadthebad wrote: | Yes simpler panels have even faster BW update. But the old | 7-colour panels took 15s to do anything... so being able to | do partial updates in a region at 300ms is a huge upgrade | for them. | dTal wrote: | That's not true. Here's a video of a Kindle Touch from | 2012 playing a movie: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr52ZWEZH4Q | keikobadthebad wrote: | It looks like you missed the "old 7 colour panels" part. | Like this (quoting <35s update across temperature) | | https://www.waveshare.com/5.65inch-e-Paper-Module-F.htm | dTal wrote: | Yes, I did - I read 7 colors as 7 level grayscale. My | apologies. | SekstiNi wrote: | Depends on how much of the screen is being refreshed, among | other factors, but for writing the rM2 is apparently down | to 24ms. [1] | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5XUTnPQ5i4 | cubefox wrote: | Including "(rollable)" is really misleading. The main | innovation is the new subtractive color mixing technology. The | rollability is nothing special. | SamBam wrote: | That video could have been rather improved on, for a marketing | video... The display didn't update after the second "page | flip," so the user flipped a third time, and then it turned out | the page had flipped to page 3 while it was closed and | immediately flipped to page 4. | | I get that that's how it will probably actually happen, but re- | shoot for a little bit of polish... | | Also the webpage didn't correctly fit on my Android browser | (both Firefox and Chrome). | dmix wrote: | Agreed. 16 second marketing videos doesn't "tease" anything | it just makes you wonder what they are hiding. | Izkata wrote: | > I get that that's how it will probably actually happen | | I don't think that's what happened. The rollable video shows | two of the same pages in the same order; it looks more like a | slideshow they didn't time right. | solarkraft wrote: | Cool, but it doesn't matter yet. A lot of E-Ink announcements | don't translate into unable consumer devices for years. | IshKebab wrote: | It matters because it means the technology exists and is | therefore much more likely to come to a product at some point. | fortran77 wrote: | The black-white e-readers are doing a great job at a great | price point. Color would have to have a similar battery life, | resolution, and only an incremental price-increase to be | appealing. | mateo1 wrote: | They're not doing that great. A4 (or letter) sized ereaders | right now cost $800+, have a resolution of about 200dpi and | only a few shades of gray, so they're practically monochrome. | For that amount I can print thousands upon thousands of pages | at 1200+ dpi on real paper which I prefer. I thought about it | and bought a laser printer. When the technology matures a bit | more, I'll be waiting. Less eagerly every year though, as | I've been waiting for affordable large ereaders for 10+ years | now. And I'm seeing a shift to tablet-like device features | which I'm not fond of. | chokma wrote: | That sounds like an interesting idea - now I want to print | ebooks in my favorite font size... but that feature is | locked behind DRM. Still, for webnovels it may be viable. | [deleted] | ciupicri wrote: | Are talkinkg about the tiny e-readers locked into Amazon's | ecosystem? | ta988 wrote: | There are many others. Kobo for example doesn't lock you to | anything and you can pretty much do whatever you want with | the Linux on them. | innocenat wrote: | There are tons of e-reader out there, but if you aren't | searching it's likely you will only know Kindle. Kobo is | also very popular, but there're also PocketBook, Nook, | Likebook, Onyx Boox, Bigme, etc. | mdp2021 wrote: | I see TheVerge has an article about it: | | https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/25/23041407/e-ink-color-gall... | | ...And now for the rant: the opening: | | > _E Ink has a new version of color electronic paper, and, while | it isn't as pretty as an OLED_ | | These people must be those who use EPD at midnight and OLED at | noon. (Of course it can be done, it just makes no general sense.) | BbzzbB wrote: | This is great, and I can't wait for it to commoditized, but I bet | I'm way priced out. | | In general, I find e-ink displays relatively expensive for | modestly sized ones (say 6 inch +). What's some of the best | deals/value for e-ink displays for some personal projects? Broken | e-readers for parts? | Rebelgecko wrote: | For smaller displays than you're looking for (<4 inch), | AliExpress has some pretty reasonable prices. Even for color | displays. | | For larger ones, I think the best option is something like a | recycled kindle. There was even a post on HN a few months ago | from a company selling Kindle displays hooked up to breakout | boards (may have even had on-onboard microcontroller, like an | ESP-32?) | roeles wrote: | Kobo readers run Linux. I used kobo mini's as moving map | display in my glider. The entire thing cost me about 60 euros | from eBay. The root system is even an SD card, so you can just | swap cards to restore the stock firmware. | cubefox wrote: | What's so innovative about E Ink Gallery is the fact that they | apparently mix color similar to printed-on paper. This means they | don't have to use additive subpixel color mixing, which darkens | the display a lot, and which is the reason why colored e-paper | isn't a thing in actual products. | | The problem was that E Ink Gallery was extremely slow to refresh, | but with E Ink Gallery 3, the technology is now "just" slow | instead of extremely slow. Though perhaps still a bit too slow to | use it in actual e-reader devices. | noasaservice wrote: | This company has held back e-ink technology via patents. They | refuse to talk to small/independent vendors, and try to squash | anybody ordering components from abroad. Now, why does that | matter? Cause the Chinese had 'full color eink' for years. | | https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002467730675.html?algo_e... | | And there's eink phones AND tablets both. Reasonably priced. Yet | we see _none_ of that kind of innovation here... I guess we might | in 5-7 years. If it 's profitable. | throw10920 wrote: | Given their previous track record of _rampant_ IP theft (from | EU + Japan in addition to US), it 's rather likely that these | Chinese companies "developed" this technology through IP theft, | rather than greenfield development. | | That's also a contributing factor to their products being | affordable - because they don't have any R&D costs to recoup, | just those associated with espionage. | orliesaurus wrote: | It's wild how in 2022 there's nothing consumers can do to stop | this "price gouging" - I guess it's a free market and it's a | niche so they have little competition and kinda a monopoly? | | I don't understand the legal aspect of this stuff, but if the EU | bureaucrats were able to impose USB-C standard instead of custom- | charging-ports, surely they could do something about this too? Am | I totally wrong? Seriously curious.... | | One more thought: colored rollable e-ink can have so many good | uses, from being used in education to cut back on paper-books to | displaying advertising and more utilitarian uses in our every-day | life. gatekeeping this tech is absurd to me. | orliesaurus wrote: | I put "price gouging" into quotes - as a non-native, I can't | think of a better word for it | eigenvalue wrote: | If you didn't have billions of people around the world buying | them, the technology in your typical smartphone would cost many | many thousands of dollars. Big markets with big demand can | drive down cost curves almost unimaginably. It starts making | sense to hire smart people to look at every aspect of how the | thing works and is made, and to invest huge amounts of capital | into equipment that can only be justified when the number of | units is in the tens of millions. Something as niche as | oversized passive e-ink screens will never attract that capital | or expertise, since it could never recoup those costs. | Eventually someone will either improve the technology enough | for it to have a large end market (changing wallpaper in the | home?) or it will stay niche until the patents run out and the | tech can find more applications that currently don't make sense | because the licensing fees would be too high. | goodpoint wrote: | > kinda a monopoly | | "thanks" to patents is 100% a monopoly. | | But maybe there is hope https://blog.the-ebook- | reader.com/2015/03/02/german-court-fi... | radu_floricica wrote: | Why do you think this is price gouging and not just expensive | to make? Plenty of things cost a heap of money even after years | of development - I'm pretty sure you can buy a flying car if | you have a billion lying around. | spiderice wrote: | > cut back on paper-books | | I read an article posted here on HN about how using an iPad to | cut back on paper basically never becomes worth it (from an | environmental perspective). If you already have an iPad, sure, | use it for not taking and it will be better than using paper. | But don't go buy an iPad specifically to save on paper, because | that will make the problem worse. | | I wonder how much of that same principle applies to e-ink | displays. They obviously use a lot less power, so maybe it | would be worth it. I'm really not sure. | | edit: did a quick Google search. I believe this was the | article: https://slate.com/technology/2011/09/paper-versus-the- | ipad-i... | [deleted] | stevehawk wrote: | what price gouging are we talking about? | orliesaurus wrote: | that's why I put it into quotes - I can't think of a better | word for it | boringg wrote: | Can't wait for E Ink to make it to the masses at a reasonable | price. I am suspect that it won't get surpassed by its | competitors by that it gets there and everyone will have moved | on. Would be sad but a high probability outcome. | micromacrofoot wrote: | that refresh shimmer is brutally bad, is smooth refresh | completely unsolvable for e-ink? | cubefox wrote: | It appears unsolvable by the electrophoresis displays which E | Ink makes. Since it is based on moving solid particles through | a viscous liquid, which is slow. | micromacrofoot wrote: | ah exactly the detail I was wondering about, thank you | DoingIsLearning wrote: | I think it is purposeful in order to counteract ghosting. | | But indeed at the end of the day e-ink is suitable for slow | changing content (mainly reading blocks of text). | rychco wrote: | Oddly enough, I kind of enjoy it. | henriquecm8 wrote: | It's similar to glitching we see in scifi/cyberpunk | micromacrofoot wrote: | oh sure, it's kind of cool if you're only seeing it | occasionally... but not something I'd enjoy for anything that | updates more often than a powerpoint presentation (which is | fine as a known limitation) | ramses0 wrote: | Think of it like a split-flap display. It physically must | "rotate" something to the right color. I'm no e-ink expert, but | there may always be some level of "shimmer". | robinsoh wrote: | > It physically must "rotate" something to the right color. | I'm no e-ink expert, but there may always be some level of | "shimmer". | | You're thinking of gyricon where the balls rotate. That's | different. The bulk of the industry now uses electrophoresis | which is moving ink particles electrically. | fortran77 wrote: | They're still moving though. And that's always going to be | slower than turning an LED on. | serenitylater wrote: | These results have to be sandbagged right? Is there any reason | this stuff wasn't rolled out years ago except one company | sandbagging technical development so they can sell 2008 | technology at 2022 prices? | my123 wrote: | Production readiness is a very hard thing to do. Not because | you can make one unit you can make a bunch of them at | acceptable yields. | egypturnash wrote: | Woo, black and white update time is down to about 3fps now! Three | very flickery frames a second. | | _sigh_ | | I have been wanting a color e-ink Mac I can work with under | direct sunlight for so long now. I will be waiting many years | longer. | mdp2021 wrote: | On the one hand, I would suggest if that laptop you are using | can be charged with a "powerbank": that would increase your | "mileage". On the other, I am suspecting you are referring to | an OLED display: contrary to LCDs, I have not yet seen a | natural light friendly OLED and I suspect it would be | drastically power inefficient. | daenz wrote: | Honest question, why? Do you sit in direct sunlight often? Are | you looking for extreme battery life? | egypturnash wrote: | I'm a freelance artist. I have a decent studio setup at home | but I also really love taking my laptop out to a cafe or a | park. | | When I'm under a tree in the park, there's no power (so yes, | battery life helps - it's why I mostly use Mac Airs), and my | screen has to fight the sunshine. Which makes battery life | even worse because I've gotta run the backlight at full | power. Sitting under a tree with a sunscreen attached to the | computer helps some, but I would be _delighted_ if I could | sit out under the sun. | daenz wrote: | Personally I'm worried about battery damage to my | electronic devices when they get direct sunlight. I've had | a phone cook its battery in the sun (battery swelled up), | and my kindle gets pretty hot as well. Is that something | you're worried about? | egypturnash wrote: | Nah, not really. The only heat problems I've ever had are | the design flaw with my current 2016 Macbook Pro that | makes it heat up its batteries when charging. | | I'm also probably not gonna sit out in the direct sun for | hours on end, I tend to stay in one spot working 2h at | the absolute most. Gotta get up and take a break to bike | around the city every so often. | srinathkrishna wrote: | I have been very stoked with color epaper since the mirasol days | and alas nothing has materialized yet out to the mainstream. | Looking forward to see how this pans out. | [deleted] | mas-ev wrote: | I was in the same position but ended up buying the Onyx Boox | Nova 3 color. They recently released the Nova Air color which | has a better body and warm light functional (wish I had that on | mine for night time reading.) | | I love it for reading technical blogs, code, tech books. I | wanted an ereader I could install android apps on and preserve | color syntax highlighting. | | Disclaimer, these devices phone home to China so most people | install apps like NetGuard to curate an Allowlist of apps that | can access the internet. | | Some people push this stuff to the extreme and code on them. I | would not enjoy that and do not recommend it but it is | possible. | chrisgp wrote: | I remember this project from a while back: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25063726 Very cool idea but | the screen used was $2k+, and two years later the price is the | same. | | Seems like we're still a long way off from reasonably priced | large e-ink displays -- very curious to see any progress in this | space. | xd1936 wrote: | I too think about this project all the time. I wish I could | have a wall-mounted raw display to use with a Pi or Arduino as | a picture frame that didn't cost thousands of dollars for the | panel. | wakeupcall wrote: | As written by others, probably due to eink the company itself. | | I love eink. I have several readers, a remarkable which I | adore. | | I wouldn't mind using a slow-refresh display for coding. The | price just makes it impossible. Having color for this task, | even if washed out, would be an absolute boon. | | As for all eink announcements, they may have the tech, but they | might make it so so expensive that nobody is going to translate | it into mass production product. Without volume, we'll never | get better prices. | | Been watching eink for a lifetime now. I read each announcement | as a red herring at this point.. | mrandish wrote: | > Been watching eink for a lifetime now. | | If it's been that long, do the blocking patents expire soon? | voakbasda wrote: | One modus operandi of such companies is to amass a lot of | patentable ideas as trade secrets, which subsequently can | be rolled out as sequential patents. This effectively | extends their monopoly on the products as a whole, despite | patents expiring that protect the initial innovations. They | can always roll something out sooner if a competitor might | be approaching their IP moat. | resoluteteeth wrote: | If the devices are being embedded in consumer products | like eink screens, is it really possible to treat the | technology as a trade secret? | lostcolony wrote: | They only go out in devices after they've been patented. | | Think of 3 years of research. Rather than it leading to | three years of progressively better consumer devices, you | instead patent the first idea and use it to go to market, | then sit on the rest. After X amount of time (where X < | 20 years), you patent the next winning idea, and go to | market with it. Etc. | | This presents a challenge to would be competitors; to go | to market, you have to leapfrog the existing technology | and patent (with as broad a language as patents tend to | have), hope the incumbent doesn't have something that | would immediately deprecate your product (or at least, | relies itself on something you patented along the way), | and then overcome the incumbent's existing advantage in | in the market. And also be prepared for a legal fight, | since almost assuredly one of you is going to accuse the | other of infringing a patent. | nicd wrote: | One of my friends works on an e-ink product. My | understanding is that one of the major trade secrets are | the e-ink waveforms (the sequence of voltages used to | print and erase content on the display). They are shared | under NDA and baked into product firmware. Apparently the | open-source versions are significantly worse. | mdp2021 wrote: | > _the open-source versions are significantly worse_ | | That can be overcome, especially with sustained | collaborative effort. | | But the production of the displays, controller software | aside, will not be "cheap". | ratmice wrote: | Hearsay, but I've read in the past that these were | tailored specifically to the display, so difficult to | actually collaborate since each display is a little | different. | lostcolony wrote: | If you want an e-ink device using 20 year old technology | you can get a used one for cheaper than any would be | competitor can produce one. | | If you want one using anything developed in the past 5 | years...oh, look, that's why eink still has a research | division; they've been slowly improving things (not as fast | as actual competition would cause, but enough to make it | hard for someone to just leapfrog them using seed capital) | and so would-be competitors are now running up against | patents with 15+ years left. | JohnJamesRambo wrote: | Do they just not believe the pricing rules all other business | is pretty much based on or what? With scale comes the real | money, right? | ineedasername wrote: | It's possible they don't see much elasticity in the market, | e.g. that a 50% decrease in cost would net them >= 50% | increase in sales. | | In the very short term they're probably right, but I think | they'd be wrong in the long term: once the price drops it | might take time but I think people would come up with a | variety of novel products and use cases. Amazon for example | has made a big bet on digital comics w/comixology. I'm sure | they'd love to offer an affordable color comic reader. Or | cheap 8.5x11 tablets could become the default note taking | devices for a lot of students, especially for many STEM | classes. | bee_rider wrote: | I think this is the real head-scratcher. | | Wondering if either they just fundamentally aren't capable | of scaling up their business, so they are getting as much | as they can out of what little they can make. | | Or maybe there's some confusing IP situation and they just | want to create a minimal number of devices to keep some | sort of... copyrights or patents alive or something (as far | as I know they don't work that way in the US, but maybe | other countries?) | | Or maybe this is, like, just the CEO's hobby project and | and they don't realize that people want these things? | | Or maybe, actually, only a couple nerds like us want these | E-ink screens. Assuming tech nerds are generally pretty | well off overall, but a fairly small-ish group, maybe E-ink | screens just end up being fairly price insensitive as a | result? | | I dunno. Seems weird though. | ineedasername wrote: | Do they even manufacture the screens themselves? I though | they mostly just did r&d and licensed things, in which | case scale shouldn't really be an issue, at least on | manufacturing the things. | janekm wrote: | I think it's the last one, the two proven applications | are book readers and price labels (and a few niche | applications like readable displays for long-life | battery-operated devices, Remarkable). There's not many | potential users clamouring for a dumb terminal "laptop" | (the battery life advantage would disappear real quick if | you tried to compile large code projects) with E-Ink | screen. Not that many people would buy a laptop that | can't play YouTube videos or go on Facebook. Even I | wouldn't want to write code on a laptop with the display | latency of e-ink... | brewdad wrote: | > Or maybe this is, like, just the CEO's hobby project | and and they don't realize that people want these things? | | There was definitely a time when I really wanted a color | e-ink screen. But now, with iPads having 10 hour battery | life, I can get all day performance and better colors and | refresh rates from that device, so my desire for color | e-ink has greatly declined. | | I do love my b&w e-reader though and use it every day. | mynameisvlad wrote: | I mean, is 10 hours really _that_ long? My SuperNote | notebook lasts for days, my Kobo for weeks. I certainly | have had flights longer than 10 hours. At least nowadays | you sometimes have a USB-A charging port if you needed, | or a 120V if you 're lucky. | Cd00d wrote: | > I wouldn't mind using a slow-refresh display for coding | | I've seen this sentiment a lot when eink displays are | discussed here. But, I'm not _quite_ sure I get it. | | I've typed in platforms with significant lag between a | keystroke and the character showing. It's horrible! So often, | you think maybe you made a typo, but have to wait to see it | and fix it, instead of a quick few backspaces and ONWARD! I | find it really disruptive to my train of thought and it | breaks the brain-interface link. | | Maybe the eink displays refresh fast enough to make this be a | minimal issue, but my few years old Kindle Paperwhite doesn't | have me confident that's true. | | Or, maybe I just type way worse than those of you that want | an eink dev environment. | dotancohen wrote: | > Been watching eink for a lifetime now. I read each | announcement as a red herring at this point.. | | I didn't even want to read the announcement, because I | already know it's showcasing exactly the tech that I want but | will never be made available. I've had half a dozen E-ink | devices and I love them. But it seems like the company behind | the tech has an active incentive to keep it out of consumers' | hands. | stjohnswarts wrote: | Musk should buy them and put a fire under their asses. | bipson wrote: | Not sure if you're joking or not... :S | ineedasername wrote: | _> an active incentive to keep it out of consumers' hands._ | | They seem to act that way, but what would be the actual | incentive? (As apposed to just bad business acumen) | mertd wrote: | They are either impossibly incompetent or there is | something about the technology that makes mass | availability in different form factors not viable and our | laymen understanding doesn't see it. | derefr wrote: | Conspiracy theory: it's because e-ink technology has | military (stealth / penaid) applications. (See: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=499TkWOl4PM; then picture | a "chameleon jet-fighter" that syncs its color to the | surrounding sky; or better yet, a chameleon _missile_. | Without losing range due to needing to power active | panels.) | | I don't necessarily mean to imply that the military is | restricting the tech for competitive reasons; but rather | just that E Ink Corporation might be price-anchoring | relative to what their biggest customer is willing to | pay. | | (See also: why "holographic glitter" is so expensive, | compared to other metallic glitters. Holo-glitter paint | is an effective radar diffuser; and, more obviously, the | glitter itself is literally | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaff_(countermeasure) !) | h2odragon wrote: | Another conspiracy theory: the LCD cartel has been paying | them not to compete. Given any actual difficulties yet to | be worked out for mass production of eink (and there's | always something), they may just be making more money by | threatening to compete with LCD displays than they could | by actually doing so. | xvector wrote: | > a "chameleon jet-fighter" that syncs its color to the | surrounding sky; | | would be largely worthless as visual isn't really the | primary way we detect and destroy aircraft anymore. | ggm wrote: | Holo glitter works in the radar domain. So, its passive | tech which has an effect. | | EInk has a refresh time. Which is a significant mismatch | to the flight speed of devices which seek to mask | themselves against changing background. More to the | point, optical detection is the least worry in this | space. by the time it's visible in motion, its already a | problem. ' | | For on-the-ground, its easier to put it under a canopy. | | EInk does nothing for radar, or thermal imaging. So your | proposed conspiracy is to defeat human eyes, which rarely | if ever are the first-spotters. The circumstances where | using radar breaches your own privacy are understood. I | would expect an ML vision system could defeat this | anyway. (and I say that as a bit of a long-term non- | believer in AI) | | I love a good conspiracy, but alas, I think this isn't | it. The grassy knoll is just, after all, a patch of | grass, and not an EInk facsimile, in my personal opinion. | jve wrote: | Yeah I wonder if price point is justified or not. | | Accessible pricing may result in eink screens taking | consumers, businesses, hobbyists and whatnot by storm. | But meh... | robinsoh wrote: | > They are either impossibly incompetent or there is | something about the technology that makes mass | availability in different form factors not viable and our | laymen understanding doesn't see it. | | You are correct, it is the equivalent of me as a display | engineer coming here and saying "Cray computers has an | active incentive to keep it out of consumer's hands" or | alleging "Microsoft is blocking progress in the operating | system industry using their patent". If you examine my | comment history, you'll see I've tried repeatedly before | on HN to explain why the physics of electrophoresis is | the dominant limitation in the industry but that is | apparently harder to understand and harder to accept, | whereas people saying things like "the company behind the | tech has an active incentive to keep it out of consumers' | hands." or "the technology is locked by a company that | doesn't innovate nor mass produce their tech. " without | citations or any evidence is accepted as the gospel | truth. :-) | haroldp wrote: | Why does my 12 year old kindle-keyboard refresh so much | faster and better than any eink hobby display that I can | buy? Do you think there is any hope of this changing? | maratc wrote: | I would not assume any malicious intent. e-Ink is a | wonderful solution looking for a problem. | | Anything with a mouse pointer can't use e-Ink because of | slow refresh rates. | | Anything looking at a web page can't use e-Ink because of | slow refresh rates. | | Anything playing video can't use e-Ink because of slow | refresh rates. | | This leaves us with e-readers, but that market is very | limited in size. Not everyone wants a dedicated book- | reading device when a multipurpose device can, besides | everything else, also read books. | | Even smaller markets are information kiosks and "smart" | price tags in supermarkets. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | _> Even smaller markets are information kiosks and | "smart" price tags in supermarkets._ | | That's not true. Electronic shelf labels sold to | supermarket chains and retailers, far outnumber the | number of e-book readers sold to consumers. Especially | that electronic price tags usually have a fixed shelf- | life (~3 years or even shorter if they get damaged), so | they need to be replaced often, while consumers generally | keep their e-book readers for many more years. | maratc wrote: | I haven't seen any chain that went fully eink, but I'm | not from the US and the labor is not so expensive here, | so the alternative (paying people to print labels and | attach them) looks cheaper here. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | I've seen them at many retailers in the EU, from Sweden, | Norway, Germany, France all the way to Romania, so I'm | curious where you're from that you haven't seen any. | Ironically, I've never seen them in the US at all during | my trips there. | maratc wrote: | I've certainly seen some combination of eInk and paper, | but never a 100% eInk. | t-3 wrote: | I'm extremely confident that a US retailer using eink | price tags would quickly find all their tags stolen or | broken and then go back to paper. | mdp2021 wrote: | The problem simply is: working with natural light with | energy efficient systems on a mainly document-based flow. | | Of those notes: I have used mouse pointers with E-Ink and | had little issue - only, I also had touchscreen so the | mouse was in general unnecessary. That statement about | hypertext is absurd: hypertext consumption is fine on | E-Ink - provided your purpose is to read those | hypertexts, instead of using the web in some "different" | way, by the way alien from what it was intended. And | video is usable, though suboptimal, if needed - the | technology was not born for that, but just in case it can | cope. | | The practical verification is given: there are people who | have been using large E-Ink devices, coupled with | keyboards, for a long time, to work on documents. | | And again let us suggest an important thing: if you | actually have to work intellectually on a document, the | same contents will remain in front of you for a | relatively long time. This makes a technology "cheap on | state retention, costly on state switch" the sensible | solution. | dylan-m wrote: | > Not everyone wants a dedicated book-reading device when | a multipurpose device can, besides everything else, also | read books. | | Someone definitely flunked the messaging on this one, and | I find it very disappointing :( The key advantage to an | e-ink style of display is less eye strain, because you | aren't staring into a bright light source that refreshes | 60 times a second. (And battery life, of course; you can | put your book down and forget about it until later). And | that this limits the device is _fine_ : a lot of people | do a lot of reading! People like reading! Alas, as more | and more people grow up reading all sorts of things on | LCDs, so the inconvenience and the discomfort is just a | normal part of reading for them, that becomes a much | harder sell. | maratc wrote: | You don't have to convince me (I bought the first | commercially available reader, Sony PRS-500, for $350 the | day it went on sale, and several others since), but for | great many people their laptop does the job just fine, | while many others enjoy the dead tree variety. | nybble41 wrote: | > because you aren't staring into a bright light source | that refreshes 60 times a second | | LCDs _update_ 60 times per second (or more... 120 Hz | displays are becoming more common) but they don 't | _flicker_ the way CRTs used to, so there 's no reason to | think this would contribute to eye strain. Brightness | could be an issue but you can just lower the brightness | of the screen to match the surroundings. | | As I see it the advantages of e-ink displays lie mainly | in their visibility in direct sunlight and minimal idle | power consumption. | stormbrew wrote: | This isn't entirely true. It's not the same intensity of | flicker, but LCDs do have a small amount of flicker at | about half their refresh rate to flip voltage and reduce | the chance of burn-in. Also, the backlight itself may | flicker depending on what kind of light source is used | (especially if it's not an LED backlight, but cheap LED | lights do flicker -- see christmas lights -- so it's | possible some cheaper LED panels might have this effect | too?). | murderfs wrote: | Cheap LED christmas lights flicker because they don't | have a bridge rectifier, so half of the input waveform is | zero, at 60Hz. You're not going to see that kind of | flicker in anything that requires real DC power (PWM | frequencies for brightness control are generally way | higher than 60Hz). | | Some displays do this as a feature though (known as | backlight strobing, motion blur reduction, etc.): LCDs | take time to transition, so if you keep the backlight on | at all times, you'll potentially see blurring from | persistence of vision while the display is mid- | transition. Instead, you can turn the backlight off until | the screen has transitioned and then turn it back on so | that you never show a partially transitioned image. | roeles wrote: | There's a whole range of applications where it makes | sense. Since it is very well readable in full sunlight, | e-ink is very suitable for low refresh aircraft displays. | I suspect the same could apply for all kinds of HMIs | which are used outdoors. | maratc wrote: | Aircraft displays need to work in full darkness too. | e-Ink might make sense but its price, compared to some | LCD screen, might not. | | Otherwise, I take from your comment that we're in | agreement that "e-Ink is a solution looking for a | problem". | t-3 wrote: | The main problems eink solves for me are eye strain and | battery life. These might not be issues for you, but I | often read 8+ hours in a day. | roeles wrote: | My experience is from gliders, which are only operated in | VFR conditions (not more than 30 minutes before sunrise | and not more than 30 minutes after sundown). VFR is | nothing glider-specific though, so I can see them being | useful in other VFR-operated aircraft too. | | In my experience e-ink displays reduce eye strain and | attract less attention. This results in more attention | being drawn to the outside world, which in turn is a good | thing for safety. | | I am not at all in agreement with your statement. In some | contexts price is not a big issue and the qualities that | e-ink brings are worth the money. | drooglyman wrote: | Suggesting that e-ink can be useful for "low refresh rate | displays in VFR aircraft" sure sounds like a solution | searching for a problem. | aaroninsf wrote: | Hypothesis: slow refresh is a feature of great value, if | the goal is to moderate media consumption and disrupt the | "engagement" drip. | | Slow refresh is a fine way of supporting healthy data | dieting. | ddingus wrote: | Yep. Low temporal fidelity has its attractions. The items | you mention are high on my personal preference lists. | Shared404 wrote: | This is why I want more availability of eink displays. | | There's lots of places I would like to put an information | readout, but not have it be an attention draw through | anything. | | More related to the fact that eink uses external lighting | I suppose. Still. | | Also I wish I had an eink screen for code. | n8cpdx wrote: | You might be surprised at how many companies get | comfortable servicing a commercial niche and just choose | not to pursue consumer growth. Without pursuing it, the | potential value is hypothetical and internally it can be | hard to build a compelling case for mass marketization. | | There is a lot of effort required to scale up | technologies to the point that it is affordable for | consumers. In the software space I see it with solutions | (think $500+/year/seat licensing) that could be broadly | useful, but the company doesn't want to make intuitive or | bug free (enterprise software users will tolerate a lot | of abuse). In the hardware space, there is a risk of | building a million units of something that doesn't sell | (think Surface RT). | jandrese wrote: | It's like 3D printers back in the 90s and 2000s. There's a | huge potential industry just waiting for the patents to | finally run out because the early innovator only cares about | tiny niche uses of the product and not undercutting those | niches with affordable consumer goods. | hemreldop wrote: | m12k wrote: | I just wish it was possible to build a version of the Frame TV | that didn't still use 30% power while in "picture mode" but | instead used a color e-ink display like this to cover the | screen with art/photos when not in TV mode. | Someone1234 wrote: | It is a cool idea, but creating that would require you to put | a color e-ink display over the normal display panel, which | may cause it to look washed out/lose crispness. | | I think it is technically possible, I'm just not sure many | would accept the cost/functionality trade-offs. But I may be | wrong. | mynameisvlad wrote: | I think the idea parent comment had is to use the rollable | technology from the article so that it only overlays when | not in use. | RoryH wrote: | Yes! This is the perfect use case for Photo frames, or even | for advertising billboards where there's no need to have | humans change the advert. | robinsoh wrote: | > Seems like we're still a long way off from reasonably priced | large e-ink displays -- very curious to see any progress in | this space | | "reasonably priced"? It will always be more expensive than | LCD/OLED because the volumes are completely different, like | 1000x different. | jonplackett wrote: | Surely if it's much cheaper volumes also go up massively... | goldcd wrote: | Surely it's both. | | 1) Product has to exist - and now it does _tick_ 2) Has to | be useful _tick_ 3) Has to have possibility of being make | cheaper by mass production _no idea_ 4) Has to be put into | mass production _depends on 3_ | | So we're currently stuck on 3. | | Not sure there's much demand for a colour e-ink tablet - | but maybe could be layered with a transparent OLED. I'd | cough up an extra PS100 for that. Normal tablet - with | reading mode. Spend a while looking at static image, OLED | turns off, e-ink layer fires up. Scroll down and the OLED | takes over. | robinsoh wrote: | > Surely if it's much cheaper volumes also go up | massively... | | No, that's not true. If you're making a black and white | screen, and you sell it at the same price as a color | screen, nobody will buy it. Volumes won't change if your | product isn't better than something equivalently priced. | thrown12 wrote: | I bought it and it's an amazing product for coding. | mdp2021 wrote: | Either this makes little sense, or it is (or may be) | unclear. <<Your product [must be] better than something | equivalently priced>> /and that performs the same | function/. Now we are talking about large bistable colour | displays - which have no competition. | dotancohen wrote: | But the E-ink screen is much better in the regards that | software developers want. Colour is not necessarily one | of those regards. | _ph_ wrote: | I am so disappointed that Amazon doesn't invest more in the | Kindle. They have deep pockets and a guaranteed market. | Currently, I am still holding out for an upgrade of the | Oasis, but would be willing to spend quite some money for | upgraded Kindles and I think I am not alone (even if they | just go to 8" and USB-C/Qi charging, it would be worth it). | Of course a 10" Kindle would be nice and a true A4 Kindle | just a dream. | Kuinox wrote: | The volumes are different because the technology is locked by | a company that doesn't innovate nor mass produce their tech. | There are tons of applications of low power screen. It could | even outweighs the OLED in term of volume. | | Some companies in China, that ignore the patents, manage to | produce 20 fps 23" eink screen. Add color to it and it's the | perfect screen for a lot of computer work. | varenc wrote: | Awhile back the Founder of Visionect refuted this idea that | patents are holding things back on hacker news: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25067824 | | My personal take: E-Ink screens have too many drawbacks for | 99% of consumers to be at all interested in them. | robinsoh wrote: | > Awhile back the Founder of Visionect refuted this idea | that patents are holding things back on hacker news: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25067824 | | Thank you for providing the link. I agree in general with | that opinion as well. | jessriedel wrote: | That comment doesn't really have any evidence beyond the | fact that it's the opinion of the founder of Visionect, | it just makes assertions, so I wouldn't say "refuted". | | Color e-ink has a killer app: Changeable photo display in | homes. This is much harder to achieve with alternative | technologies (any display emitting light is an immediate | no-go for just hanging on your wall). In contrast, | e-readers have a significantly smaller advantage over the | alternative of just reading on your phone or tablet, yet | that seems to have been enough of a market for them to | become cheap. And unlike e-readers, where you only really | need one per person, there is hardly any limit to the | number of displays people would put in their home if they | do not emit light, have nice UI, and are cheap. | bee_rider wrote: | Is that really a killer market, though? | | People have tried changeable photo displays before, with | LCD or whatever. Of course, these require more power, but | they are plugged in devices and I'm not convinced non- | technical people think about the power consumption of | their devices outside of really niche situation where | everyone knows they supposed to care (large appliances | like washing machines). And, even the best e-ink screen | looks kind of washed out when displaying color, right? | | Like I'm all in for an E-ink terminal, latency be damned, | if someone make a no-fuss one for less than a couple | hundred dollars. But I can't imagine wanting an E-ink | picture frame over (say) an OLED one (although I guess | burn in would be a problem there). | quirkot wrote: | Think bigger. Not photo display like "pictures on the end | table"... photo display like "teenager has band posters | on the wall" or even like "changing the wallpaper on my | actual wall to match the new pintrest trend" | cmrdporcupine wrote: | For black and white photos / etchings, etc. I can see it. | But yeah, the colour will always look washed out, like | older newsprint. | | I too would really dig an e-ink terminal. Just needs to | do VT-100 sequences and let me run Emacs. But I think | it's likely a niche product. | eli wrote: | "Why aren't prices of large eink panels cheaper?" is a | question that can only be answered with opinions until | someone actually does it. | | Seems like the opinion of someone actually in the | business of selling large eink panels should count for a | lot more than speculation by an outsider. | | Visionect sells some eInk signs for showing the status of | meeting and conference rooms. I thought that was a clever | application -- saves companies from having to run wires | and mount a bunch of hardware. | | Color photo displays could be cool, but I suspect it'd be | hard to compete with the incredibly cheap Google Home and | Alexa devices with screens. | kortilla wrote: | > Seems like the opinion of someone actually in the | business of selling large eink panels should count for a | lot more than speculation by an outsider. | | Not really. That particular person's entire business | depends on eink being a high margin business product. | varenc wrote: | His first comment says the opposite and that they've | tried hard to get the price down. Of course we have to | trust him on that: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25063726#25067359 | | But I can't really find any other large format e-ink | displays with the driving hardware (which can be even | pricier than the display), so I'm inclined to believe | him. | eli wrote: | High cost isn't the same as high margin. If patent fees | were a significant expense it'd be in their interest to | say so even if the margins were already high (which I | very much doubt) | robinsoh wrote: | > Not really. That particular person's entire business | depends on eink being a high margin business product. | | That claim doesn't seem to be very reasonable to me. Why | would Visionect want eink to be a "high margin business | product"? A Visionect panel is not a Veblen good as far | as I can understand. Could you share your evidence for | why you would think that? | pjerem wrote: | > Some companies in China, that ignore the patents, manage | to produce 20 fps 23" eink screen. | | I'm genuinely interested, are you talking about Onyxboox | Mira or Dasung ? Because i thought that they manufactured | official e-ink patented products | Kuinox wrote: | I was talking about Dasung. Dasung respect the patents? | My bad then, I've read somewhere they were not. | AlanYx wrote: | Dasung panels are properly licensed from eInk Corp. They | (Dasung) actually have a couple patents of their own on | their e-ink driver board tech, which drives the panels. | If you're searching a patent database, search for | "Beijing Dasung". | robinsoh wrote: | > The volumes are different because the technology is | locked by a company that doesn't innovate nor mass produce | their tech. | | Citation needed. I'd love to see some evidence backing up | your incredibly confident claim. | | > Some companies in China, that ignore the patents, manage | to produce 20 fps 23" eink screen. Add color to it and it's | the perfect screen for a lot of computer work. | | I've never heard of that. Please share some evidence for | this please. 20 fps electrophoresis? In my opinion, that's | physically impossible unless the screen is 0.1mm thick. How | did they escape Q = vA ? | dalbasal wrote: | "Citation needed" is not a nice quip. You're responding | to a forum comment, not reviewing a paper. | | It's fine to be dubious of a claim, and it's fine to ask | politely for sources or rationales. Just be nice. | scratcheee wrote: | I disagree, it is in fact a very polite and fair minded | way to respond to claim you find dubious. If anything | they were being more polite than later in the comment | when they suggested the claimed results should be | impossible (though that's still a reasonable claim to | make if they beleive it to be true). | | Rather than saying the equivalent to "I think this cannot | be true", a request for citation merely means "I am | interested in this claim and would like to know the | source" (even if phrased more tersely). The content is | more indicative of the intent than the phrasing, and | requesting a citation is not an accusation at all, it is | a request for a source for further research. | dalbasal wrote: | >>it is in fact a very polite and fair minded way to | respond to claim you find dubious. | | Citation needed. | robinsoh wrote: | > It's fine to be dubious of a claim, and it's fine to | ask politely for sources or rationales. Just be nice. | | I was not aware that "citation needed" is considered | impolite. It is something I use at work a lot when | interacting with colleagues. My apologies, I'll refrain | from that in future. | vanattab wrote: | I would be willing to bet your colleagues at work would | find it annoying and impolite too. | robinsoh wrote: | Perhaps it is a difference in 'climate' between working | in a science based industry where we often get challenged | on our data versus software development industry. Maybe | I've spent too long in academia where 'citation needed' | is an indicator of interest in my topic and considered a | good thing. | endisneigh wrote: | I didn't consider citation needed to be a "mean" thing to | say. | Kuinox wrote: | https://youtu.be/RRvlJ2HjH30?t=250 | robinsoh wrote: | Yes, that's a Dasung Paperlite. That's a regular E-Ink | screen from the same manufacturer, not as you wrote "Some | companies in China, that ignore the patents, manage to | produce 20 fps 23" eink screen. ". | | That's not 20 fps. That's A2 mode which is a 1 bit mode | and is a non-stable state so it will decay. I'd recommend | you read the user manual about how that works. | mdp2021 wrote: | A2 should be 8fps, 125ms. | | How does the 'Q = vA' law you mention apply, to reason on | an example, to the case of A2, as a limiter to the rate? | | > _A2 mode which is a 1 bit mode and is a non-stable | state so it will decay_ | | It makes little sense to use A2 on a long-lasting render | - nonetheless, I suppose the decay time will be | relatively long (I have never notice an A2 dot change | state...). | greysonp wrote: | I assume they're referring to Onyx and Dasung[1]. Not | sure if it's actually 20fps (videos I've found look to be | more in the low teens by my eye), and I believe they're | making a lot of trade-offs around ghosting and stuff to | achieve those frame rates. Also no idea what their | licensing situation is. | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRvlJ2HjH30 | ThrowawayR2 wrote: | E-Ink lists Dasung's monitor as one of their showcase | products so that supposition is incorrect: | https://www.eink.com/Laptop- | Peripherals.html?type=applicatio... | fortran77 wrote: | This is an old trope on Hacker News, as predictable as | "have you tried re-writing it in Rust." But there's little | evidence it's true. | jokowueu wrote: | I don't think he is saying patents are bad. But the | company it's self is . | robinsoh wrote: | > But the company it's self is . | | and it would be lovely if he could share what leads him | to believe that. | [deleted] | Kuinox wrote: | Did I hurt you personally for you to be so toxic with me | ? Chill. | ThrowawayR2 wrote: | There has been no evidence presented whatsoever for the | assertion that e-Ink has been abusing their IP other than | one post from a throwaway account on HN a couple of years | ago. No corroborating news articles about lawsuits, which | the post alleged; no filings about acquisitions, which | the post alleged; nothing. But somehow HN posters have | adopted that as the truth? | jokowueu wrote: | No one here has said they were abusing their IP . The | common theme on HN and other sites is that e-ink are | pricing their hardware at such a high level that it makes | anything other than small tablets unaffordable . | | We will have to just wait until the patent runs out in | order to see great advancements in this tech like what we | have seen from the aftermath of the expiration of certain | 3D printer patents | robinsoh wrote: | > We will have to just wait until the patent runs out | | I'm genuinely curious. Which patent is that? | jokowueu wrote: | Not sure which but they do have quite a few. | | https://patents.justia.com/search?q=+E+Ink+Corporation | robinsoh wrote: | > Did I hurt you personally for you to be so toxic with | me ? Chill. | | I'm sorry you feel that way, however challenging your | incredible claims and asking that you provide some | evidence before we believe you is not the same "be so | toxic with me". | Kuinox wrote: | You are thinking I feel this way because you ask for a | source. | | It's not. | | It's the condescending tone you display in every of your | response, exactly like this one. | robinsoh wrote: | > It's the condescending tone you display in every of | your response, exactly like this one. | | It is unfortunate that you continue to persist in not | providing data but instead redirecting the energy of the | conversation into allegations of condescenion which I | can't defend. All I said was. I'm sorry you feel that | way, however challenging your incredible claims and | asking that you provide some evidence before we believe | you is not the same "be so toxic with me". | Kuinox wrote: | To have a constructive discussion you must have mutual | respect, and I lost any respect to you when you showed | you had none to me. | EGreg wrote: | Which companies in China? | | Can they produce large format screens, like a few feet on | each side? | | Or do we have to buy small ones and tile them? We probably | can't tile them as they need electronics around each | border. | | I want to do e-paintings. So if you tell me which Chinese | companies, ie their websites, I would try to reach out ! | m-p-3 wrote: | If the tech becomes attractice enough (high visibility in | direct sunlight, lower power consumption, etc), maybe we'll | see more public advertisers switch to them for digital | signage, significantly increasing the demand and volume. | | One can dream.. | robinsoh wrote: | > One can dream.. | | Of faster than light travel? :-) They're limited by the | physics of electrophoresis. | m-p-3 wrote: | I mean there's other ways than refresh rate where there | can be improvement, especially on color eInk displays. | They managed to increase the DPI on this version after | all :) | rory096 wrote: | The transit stop use case really does seem to be ramping | up, including the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority | currently adding them to most surface Green Line stops: | https://www.mbta.com/projects/solar-powered-e-ink-signs | | Transit was one of the two core practical applications the | Visionect founder mentioned in Nov 2020: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25067359 | m-p-3 wrote: | Interesting. Now I'm curious about the tech used behind | it to transmit the info accross the network. I'm | wondering if a LoRa/LoRaWAN-based mesh network could do | the trick to avoid using some kind of cell data or wired | infrastructure, but also be energy-efficient enough to | work using only solar power. | Melatonic wrote: | Aren't all e-ink displays highly visible in direct | sunlight? You need exterior to even use them in the first | place | m-p-3 wrote: | I meant compared to traditional displays. | Melatonic wrote: | E-Ink is a ton more visible in direct sunlight compared | to traditional displays? | m-p-3 wrote: | Quite a bit more. | | https://i.imgur.com/Z36BcCn.jpg | mdp2021 wrote: | <<Reasonably priced>> very probably just meant "a price | closer to their individual potential buyers' attributed | value". That <<LCD/OLED>> will be cheaper does not affect | that. | pclmulqdq wrote: | Can E Ink finally launch a product at a reasonable price point? I | get that they are trying to mostly be an IP company, but at this | point, when everyone is begging for their product, shouldn't they | at least consider pivoting? Their competitors in China are | starting to have good products now, and I can't wait for E Ink | Inc to become irrelevant in the market it created. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | There isn't a use case that I personally want, that couldn't be | satisfied with transflective LCD instead of e-ink. | | They are dirt cheap but only a handful of chinese manufacturers | are using them. | | On top of the e-ink IP stronghold, I think there is also a | Product manager issue in consumer electronics. Everyone wants | to show case Macbook-esque glossy displays whereas a large | number of consumers want displays that they can use outdoors | and without eye strain. Everybody complements garmins | transflective displays but somehow nobody makes the leap of | slapping them on phones or laptops. | oneoff786 wrote: | Board game boards and cards with changeable contents. | dmonitor wrote: | A Magic deck of cards that are actually just 5in eink | displays that you program at home would be... interesting | Covzire wrote: | Know of a good 10" or larger e reader that works natively with | Kindle store? | robin_reala wrote: | Why would you tie yourself to a storefront that flexes non- | compliance with standards for commercial gain? | Covzire wrote: | A good question, might be a good time to make a clean | break, will give it some thought. | anoneon31 wrote: | My suggestion is to get Calibre, install the DeDRM plugins, | and then every ereader works with the Kindle store. You would | lose the wireless integrations with Amazon on some non-Amazon | devices. If that's important to you, then this might not be a | great solution. But otherwise, it's the best way to go. | | Not only could you then use any device on the market, but | your books are truly yours. Immune to Amazon revising them in | the future, and immune to having your books revoked. They'll | last as long as your preferred backup methods last. | | And that's a good reason to do this even if you keep using | Kindles. | innocenat wrote: | Any of the Android e-reader, like Onyx Boox. | Covzire wrote: | Doesn't look very native to me, you have to convert them. | Could one jailbreak it and simply install the Kindle app? | innocenat wrote: | You can enable Google Play on Onyx Boox. Or just sideload | the APK. Or install the Amazon Fire Store. It's just | another Android device. | E39M5S62 wrote: | There's no need to jailbreak them, they're open Android | systems. You have full Google Playstore access and can | install anything you want. | xyst wrote: | Besides the ability to "roll" the display | | Maybe there is a market for novelty or in a construction trade? | Melatonic wrote: | This would make an amazing tablet specifically for topographic | mapping. I would love something that can be used for days or | weeks on end without charging and also could do a GPS ping as | needed (manually) | cubefox wrote: | E Ink (the company) keeps improving their electrophoresis display | technology. Unfortunately the technology necessarily has very low | refresh rates since it it is based on moving around solid | particles submerged in a liquid. | | There were other passive e-paper display technologies like the | one by Liquavista (based on moving colored oil droplets) or | Mirasol by Qualcomm (mechanical micro-shutters create colored | light via interference). These were capable of achieving high | refresh rates, but unfortunately they have long been abandoned. | | I believe the monochromatic electrophoresis displays by E Ink had | higher reflectivity and lower price, which is what mattered for | e-readers, so all the others went out of business. | h-w wrote: | You can watch videos on modern eink devices from boox and | hisense. Looks like an old TV. | thrown12 wrote: | If you don't do a full screen refresh you can get 10Hz refresh | rates on newer products. The quality is similar to the | newspapers of yesteryear. | innocenat wrote: | And tons of ghosting. | other_herbert wrote: | Yeah but newspaper refresh rates are terrible... | ricksunny wrote: | In a notification-heavy, video-ad intensive world, maybe slow | refresh will someday turn out to be a feature rather than a | bug. Confining one's portable device to applications that | preserve mindfulness, focus & attention... | mackrevinack wrote: | every now and again i read hackernews and reddit stuff on my | boox ereader and having a slow refresh rate is definitely a | good "feature" since it makes it a lot more tedious to read | things compared to my phone, which helps me spend less time | scrolling aimlessly | cubefox wrote: | This reminds me of the time when I bought my first | smartphone, which was quite late. I delayed it as long as | possible, but as soon as I had it, I stopped reading books | on the train. The Web is just too addictive. At least with | snappy refresh rates. | beowulfey wrote: | The high refresh is what makes epaper notebooks such a joy to | use though | mdp2021 wrote: | The user is the one supposed to be disciplined, "not the dumb | device". | mdoms wrote: | You should read Stolen Focus by Johann Hari[0]. People all | over the world today are struggling with focus and | attention, not because they're not virtuous enough but | because tech companies have been intentionally hacking our | brains and stealing it away from us. If you don't have time | to read the book he did an outstanding interview[1] with | Bari Weiss on her podcast Honestly which I urge you to | listen to. | | I used to think of attention in the same way you do, | blaming and hating myself because I felt like I wasn't | disciplined enough. It's so important to understand that | this is something billionaire tech giants have done to us, | on purpose. | | 0 https://www.kobo.com/ww/en/ebook/stolen-focus | | 1 | https://www.honestlypod.com/podcast/episode/2f84e8d4/your- | at... | mdp2021 wrote: | Dear mdoms, first of all allow me to grant you that I | will check the material you kindly indicated, when time | will allow. | | But let me confirm my point: if <<tech companies have | been intentionally [etc.]>>, this must involve their | users, who have been using those services (I can guess | which ones they may be) willingly, though innocently. | Many of them should also have experiences the other side | in life - I hope they received a decent scholarization - | and could and should have seen the difference from that | side to the other side, and act accordingly taking | measures and distances. Many of us have tried experiences | in our life, and noticed that they were leading them into | something undesirable, and consequently relegated those | experiences to appropriate spaces (if any) - this is | perfectly normal. | | In short: if visiting intoxicant.com makes you | intoxicated1, you should probably avoid it, or greatly | reduce it, or manage it differently (actively)1. | | 1and note that while they may try hard, it's not an | overpowering "injection" - I suppose it must be some bad | habit they attempt to instill in users, and which the | said users may dodge instead of adopt. You do have a | will. | giraffe_lady wrote: | Yes, definitely, this and all related problems people have | with focus and attention on modern devices is just because | they aren't virtuous enough. | | ??? | mdp2021 wrote: | To the original point: "crutches" are not a feature, they | are a device. They are not universally useful - the same | way that prescription glasses are not. A low refresh | display may help some people: it is not helpful in | general; some people find featureless text editors less | distracting, normalcy greets happily the availability of | features and options and hides the GUI with a keyboard | shortcut. | | To your statement: I do not see how <<modern devices>>, | on literal terms, can be the issue: they are *organizers* | (meant to optimize your time). If people use them | differently, that is not a fault in the device. | | To your statement again: focus and attention are skills | that individuals develop. If they are underdeveloped, | they should if sough be developed. If your point is | elsewhere, please make it explicit. I must presume you do | not think that it is the responsibility of your sofa to | sculpt your abdominals (nor, for that matter, to make you | use your sofa wisely). | cubefox wrote: | That's an interesting point. | throw10920 wrote: | > Unfortunately the technology necessarily has very low refresh | rates since it it is based on moving around solid particles | submerged in a liquid. | | Why is the ReMarkable 2 screen able to follow your pen stroke | with such low latency, then? | adamrmcd wrote: | There are full updates and partial updates. The former | involves refreshing the whole display multiple times to | remove ghosting, and a complete redraw. The latter is a | targeted change at specific coordinates, which typically | involves going from white to black. Very fast, but it's a | single point/block at a time. | abeppu wrote: | I do wish there was a reasonably priced color remarkable | equivalent. Very frequently, I start reading a paper on the | remarkable and have to bail when a chart distinguishes | lines by color. | rnmp wrote: | Remarkable owner here. RM display doesn't anti-alias actual | pen strokes, pretty sure this makes the screen refresh | faster. Everything else that is anti-alias tho is a bit | slower to refresh. | webmobdev wrote: | I wish Qualcomm's Mirasol display had seen light - you could | even watch videos on them comfortably (as per the demo). They | were building a huge plant to manufacture those displays | commercially and suddenly the whole thing tanked. I think Apple | bought parts of it. | cubefox wrote: | Their last innovation was called Mirasol SMI, which let them | change color within one MEMS block (instead of just switching | it between color/black), so that they wouldn't need subpixels | to create color. They were way ahead of E Ink in these | respects. Unfortunately Qualcomm pulled the plug shortly | after the SMI announcement. I'm not sure which part Apple | actually bought, whether it was just labs or actual IP as | well. | Rygian wrote: | I thought the color in Mirasol displays was achieved by | electrically adjusting the distance between a transparent and a | reflective plate, creating a controlled iridescence. Were there | shutters on top? | cubefox wrote: | No you are right, the term "shutter" wasn't appropriate. Not | a native speaker... | grishka wrote: | Might be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. | | In the 00s, there were reflective color LCDs in things like | phones and portable game consoles. The kind that isn't black | when off. Why is this technology not developed further any | more, and all modern color LCDs rely on backlight? If it's a | dead end, why? | Ycros wrote: | The recently launched Playdate handheld gaming device uses a | monochrome Sharp brand Memory LCD with no backlight. | cubefox wrote: | Yeah, so the reflective LCD technology isn't quite dead. I | guess when both reflectivity and quick refresh rates are | required, monochrome LCD is still the only solution, since | Liquavista and Mirasol were discontinued. For color | displays there is simply no solution at all with decent | reflectivity I believe. The E Ink Gallery 3 display seems | to mostly solve the low reflectivity problem, since it does | not rely on standard additive sub-pixel color mixing. But | there is no similar solution for higher refresh rates. | There were improved Mirasol prototypes which apparently | solved the issue, but shortly after they were shown, the | development of the Mirasol technology was discontinued. | kingcharles wrote: | Power. I don't think there were cheap blue LEDs when these | displays first came out, so the backlights were all | fluorescent, which was the main power draw in the display. | Once LEDs came along it massively reduced the power | consumption of the backlight to where it could be used even | in low-power devices. | nicoburns wrote: | These still exist. Some smart watches still use them. | adrusi wrote: | No question reflective LCDs are rare, but you can look at the | pebble smart watch or playdate game console for modern | devices using reflective LCDs, for an idea of where that tech | has gone. | rrrrrrrrrrrryan wrote: | It's just a strange set of constraints. If you need a | miniscule battery, long battery life, where the device will | often be used outdoors, and don't care about color accuracy | at all, they're perfect. | | Smartwatches are the obvious application, and it's why all | Garmin watches use this tech. For most other things, it just | makes more sense to sacrifice battery life or put in a bigger | battery to get a massively better quality screen indoors. | cubefox wrote: | I think in the failed first e-reader wave actually used | reflective LCDs. The problem was that these were quite dark | and somewhat viewpoint dependent. The successful second wave | (pioneered by Sony and dominated by Amazon) used | electrophoresis displays by E Ink and another company I can't | remember. Those were much more reflective, somewhat | approaching actual paper. | skykooler wrote: | Brightness and contrast in reflective color LCDs are very | poor, because the polarizing filter blocks half the light, | then the color filter on each subpixel blocks a further two | thirds, so a fully "white" image will only return one-sixth | of the incoming light. Power efficiency has also improved for | backlights, so there's less of a benefit to omitting one than | there once was. | oynqr wrote: | These displays can also work wonderfully, see the Amazfit | Bip. | torginus wrote: | But since human vision perceives brightness | logarithmically, a 6x drop still looks like a surface | darker by a constant amount I think. This is an issue that | regular, backlit LCDs also need to overcome. | Jiro wrote: | I'm still waiting for someone to create a modern equivalent to | the Pebble watch with a color e-ink screen that can stay on all | the time. I still use my Pebble, but the battery charge only | lasts about a day and a half and I'll have to replace it at some | point. | h-w wrote: | Garmin instinct 2 solar has the same black and white screen as | the pebble and requires zero charging; battery lasts forever | with enough sun. | Jiro wrote: | My Pebble is color, not B&W. | gnicholas wrote: | I find that turning on Airplane Mode overnight substantially | extends my battery life, perhaps from 3 to 5 days. It also | prevents me from being awakened by notifications, which seem to | come through regardless of DND mode on my iPhone. It's also | easy to trigger: just hold the left side button for a couple | seconds. | | I would pay $75 for someone to replace the battery in my Pebble | and maintain water resistance. I don't trust myself to do it, | but eventually I may try. My current fallback plan is a Fossil | hybrid smartwatch, which is nicer looking, but has a worse | UI/UX. | mas-ev wrote: | I'd pay top dollar for a pebble time with smaller bezels and | thinner body. Although, the pebble time was super thin compared | to today's standards. | | Are there any truly thin smart watches? The leaks for the new | pixel watch kill all hope in my mind that I'll ever get a smart | watch again since they are all thick and heavy. Even fit bits | are thick compared to the pebble time. | aembleton wrote: | Something like the Amazfit Bip? https://www.amazfit.com/en/bip | sedatk wrote: | > 45-day battery life | | Wow, that's probably the first time an always-on electronic | device actually surpassed my Nokia 6310's 21-day battery life | in the last two decades. It's really hard to imagine a | cellphone charge lasting for three weeks today. How far we've | come :P | aembleton wrote: | You get 60 days with the much more expensive Vertix 2 and | that also has an always on display | https://www.coros.com/vertix2 | | I have the Coros Pace, so can vouch for their battery life | claims. I get between one and two weeks between charges, | depending how much I use the GPS. | woojoo666 wrote: | I returned my amazfit bip almost immediately. It's too dim | with the backlight off and looks like a toy with the | backlight on. If you look for photos of real life usage | you'll see what I mean. The wyze watch blew me away in terms | of looks and battery life (especially considering the price), | they _must_ be selling at a loss. However I 'm also not a | fitness junkie so I don't use the watch heavily and can't | report on how useful the watch actually is | user_7832 wrote: | Did you have the Bip (which iirc hasn't been sold | officially for over a year now) or the Bip U/Bip Pro? The | OG Bip screen is much more reflective. Here's an image of | my Bip - https://i.imgur.com/DBzoDp5.jpg | Jiro wrote: | Actually I don't use the Pebble for fitness. I like having | the weather, calendar, location, and sunrise/moon phase | (though that depends on the watch face). | politelemon wrote: | Can we expect this to show up on ereaders anytime soon? | dominotw wrote: | there are some ereaders with color already but they are niche | because there isn't a huge demand of color. | cubefox wrote: | I think they are niche because they have a much worse | reflectivity (and hence contrast) than usual monochromatic | displays. The existing approaches use sub-pixels to create | color via additive color mixing. This approach throws away | roughly two thirds of the incoming light. E.g. a red pixel | consists of red+black+black sub-pixels. | pangaurdian wrote: | Took about 5 years for Onyx to release a color e-reader. People | are buying them. They are kind of niche because the screens are | greyer than monochrome screens, and the main use of an e-reader | is to read b/w text. But it's first gen tech. As contrast | improves, more color e-readers will be sold. Onyx is always the | first to push the new tech. Eventually Amazon etc will start | releasing them. Give it about 3 years. | guyzero wrote: | This is great less because anyone needs a folding display but | because hopefully it won't shatter if you look at it wrong (like | all their other displays). ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-28 23:00 UTC)