[HN Gopher] Pets Are Not Luggage ___________________________________________________________________ Pets Are Not Luggage Author : Kaibeezy Score : 64 points Date : 2022-04-28 19:21 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (petairways.com) (TXT) w3m dump (petairways.com) | korse wrote: | First world countries are proposing to fight climate change, | while rolling out air carrier services to transport bulk | chihuahuas. I feel like this is going to be an excellent target | for those in favor of a carbon neutral future. | fullshark wrote: | Are the images below the improvement? What does it look like in | an commercial airliner? | | Edit: Yes I mean what perardi shares below, it's not far off what | I imagine traveling in cargo hold is like for pets. | xeromal wrote: | It looks like petairways has the animals in a temperature | controlled environment and they're monitored during transit. | perardi wrote: | You mean this one? | | https://secureservercdn.net/166.62.114.250/tje.5a9.myftpuplo... | | It's actually better if you view the full-resolution version-- | looks far less like a prison. Poor choice of on-camera flash, | and poor choice of moping dog. | jjtheblunt wrote: | but great name for the little dog! | rootusrootus wrote: | > What does it look like in an commercial airliner? | | Depends. Unaccompanied animals are transported in the cargo | hold, though I believe some care is taken (they're not just | tossed in like luggage). Small animals can be taken with you if | they will fit under the seat, on some airlines. | ldoughty wrote: | In order to fit under the seat... Would that mean your pets | are mice? Or ants? Barely enough room for my feet under some | airline seats... I doubt any breed of cat or dog would fit, | unless they were <1 year old. | bmitc wrote: | I have flown with my cat several times. It's unbelievably | annoying and my cat is the by far the least of my worries. | Usually, it's a $100 or so fee one way, so around $200 round | trip. But yet, they take up one of your carry on luggage bags, | and you have to sign something that they (the airline) will | provide absolutely additional service for anything and they have | no liability. Then, they only allow a certain amount of pets on | the flight (their discretion?), and so it amounts to a first | come, first serve basis. There's no way to pre-register the pet. | You have to do it when you check in. So, what is the ridiculous | fee even for? | | Oh, and to go through security, you have to take a nervous and | scared cat out of their carry case in the middle of the security | line, walk through the medical detector, and then they have to | test both of your hands for residue while still carrying the cat. | They will _not_ let you put the cat back before they've tested | your hands. It makes no sense. | | The whole process and fee is basically security and the airlines | saying "we're annoyed, so we'll make you pay for it with process | and fees". | | I always make it a point to notify the passengers next to me that | I have a cat in case they are allergic. This again is something | the airline does not care about to do themselves, which again | makes no sense because it's probably the single biggest risk for | the flight and passengers (someone having an allergic reaction in | the middle of a flight). | rdl wrote: | People have tried this so many times and it always fails. It's a | huge issue for going to/from Puerto Rico, due to 1) weather 2) | shitty ground services 3) no land connection. My friend has | planes and one of them will be part 135 (charter) compatible, so | I've been looking at doing monthly flights with a vet and ~10 | animals for 2.5h from South Florida to Puerto Rico (especially | for people with animals banned on flights due to size or facial | structure, or people who value their pets enough to be less price | sensitive generally). | | (I fly cats for adoption from PR to ATL, MIA, FLL, TPA sometimes; | it's interesting traveling with them in the cabin. Usually they | are very young kittens and very quiet the whole time.) | sf_rob wrote: | I think it's just not overriding a Wordpress template default, | but it's hilarious that their main homepage link goes to a | wedding rsvp url* lol. | | *https://divi.dev/wedding/#rsvp | drewcoo wrote: | Great! Now let's see someone do that with kids. | pigtailgirl wrote: | recently discovered screaming kids & wild children are | fantastic tools for practicing patience & tolerance - | especially without any of my own - | askonomm wrote: | I have the opposite thing. I become more and more frustrated | and intolerant towards kids and especially their parents for | making the rest of us go through that. I get it that they | wanted kids and were ready for the screaming and whining and | moaning, but I didn't want that. And yet I have no option, I | have to tolerate it, too. | | If I could pay for child-free transport, I would. | rsyring wrote: | Invest in a good pair of noise cancelling head phones? | throw7 wrote: | My dad told me I was one of _those_ type of cry babies. :) | Now, I've been on those flights and I just laugh. A little | perspective may help. | bryanrasmussen wrote: | >I get it that they wanted kids and were ready for the | screaming and whining and moaning | | you should consider as various circumstances arise that | maybe they wanted kids without disabilities that cause the | screaming, whining, and moaning and while you have to | tolerate it they might have to live with it for the rest of | their lives. | | Maybe I'm just touchy though because I ran into someone | with an attitude last week. | fluoridation wrote: | Huh? A kid doesn't need to be disabled to be loud and | obnoxious. Hell, neither does an adult. | pigtailgirl wrote: | used to view it this way also - flipped the script - | because - life is too short to raise the blood pressure | over things: ultimately beyond ones control - easier on the | psyche to lower the ego to zero in these situations - smile | - think about this as part of the human experience - use it | as a test of my will - empathy & compassion for my fellow | humans - brings peace - even joy - for me anyways - :=) | jghn wrote: | In general you can get closer to this by paying more. For | instance with air travel families with children don't often | fly first class or stay at hotels at the upper tier of | cost. But it's not perfect on most cases | sokoloff wrote: | You can. Planesense, NetJets, Delta Black, and many others | would be happy to take your business. | | Far short of that, first class on trans-oceanic tend to be | kid-free or well-behaved kids at least. Domestic flights, | first-class is less pricey and therefore more prone to | having kids in it. | Zhenya wrote: | What is delta black. I can't find anything after a | cursory search. | avalys wrote: | I have heard horror stories of people collecting their pets after | being transported in the cargo hold of a commercial airliner, and | discovering that they've gone deaf, probably because they were | left out on the ramp for too long near to a running jet engine by | the some careless worker. | | I have a 50-pound dog and am just resigned to taking a road trip | with him or leaving him with friends when I have to travel. | | I wish at least one commercial airline would adopt a "pet- | friendly" policy and just allow people to purchase an extra seat | for their dog. My dog would be happy to take the middle seat | between me and my girlfriend, would stay out of the way of | others, and I'd pay a significant amount of money if this were an | option. | 235235235 wrote: | I'm not sitting next to a pit bull. Also, what if the dog | simply refuses to stop barking the entire time? And where do | they go to the bathroom? | cmckn wrote: | When I moved states, I had to fly with my rabbit. At the time, | Alaska Airlines was the only carrier that would allow a rabbit | in the cabin. I thought that was odd, considering a rabbit | would indubitably make less of a commotion than a cat or dog. | My rabbit was shaking the whole flight, poor thing; I can't | imagine him being in the cargo area. | bobro wrote: | Seems like the variety of outcomes for allowing pets would make | this prohibitive. Imagine the first time a dog bites another | passenger or shits on a seat mid flight or starts | uncontrollably barking. | krthr wrote: | In Colombia its possible to take your pet with you in the cabin | (you must pay an extra fee). I thought it was the same in most | of the world. | antisthenes wrote: | Most pets you can take in the cabin have a strict weight | limit which excludes most dogs. | | Or at least most dogs worth having anyway. | danhak wrote: | Some people are allergic. Some people have phobias. Some people | would simply prefer not to be near an animal that may drool, | shed, bark or otherwise act unpredictably when stressed on a | flight. | | None of that is unreasonable. I have nothing against dogs and | dog owners but too many owners these days seem oblivious to the | fact that many other people would prefer not to be forced to | share space with animals. | armchairhacker wrote: | There's an easy solution to this: pet-friendly and pet- | unfriendly airlines. The prices shouldn't be much different, | because there are benefits to both being allowed to bring | your pet and not being around pets, and in most cases the | experience is nearly the same. If they are, the pet-friendly | airline would be the more expensive one. | lotsofpulp wrote: | And then everyone claims their animal is a service animal | so they do not have to pay extra to go on the pet friendly | airline per ADA, and we are back to square one. | scott_w wrote: | That's not how that works. You don't just "declare" | they're a service animal and all is well. In fact, even | real service animals often have issues in spite of the | laws supposedly ensuring their access. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Per this website: | | https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/aviation- | consumer... | | And this one: | | https://beta.ada.gov/topics/service-animals/ | | It seems like there is nothing stopping someone from | claiming their animal is a service animal. | dwighttk wrote: | >You don't just "declare" they're a service animal and | all is well. | | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united-airlines-changes- | policy-... | | the peacock didn't get to fly, but before they changed | their policy it was $125 for a pet or $0 for a comfort | animal, and they hadn't been checking if the animal was | vaccinated, obedient, or that there was any medical | reason for the person to have the animal (so it seems | like you could just declare your pet to be a comfort | animal and save $125) | rockemsockem wrote: | No one is making their animal a service animal to save | money. They're doing it to avoid putting their animal | under the plane. The "saving money by making your dog an | ESA or service animal" was just airline propaganda. | remuskaos wrote: | Surely, these people would still have the option not to book | a flight with PetFriendlyAirways. | wcarss wrote: | They could offer just a few "pet flights", with different | livery, and interiors for easier cleaning, and a premium on | the tickets for the pet owner and pet seats -- then also a | discount for the excess no-pet travelers who explicitly opt | into filling out a pet flight. | | It might be a terrible idea, but I've both heard and had | worse! | slillibri wrote: | I doubt there is enough demand for them to invest the | hundreds of millions per aircraft to provide this service. | In addition, each of the routes they would be able to | provide would remove gates for other, more profitable | flights. Another factor would be turnaround, i.e. cleaning | and resetting a 'pet-friendly' flight would probably take | longer then a regular flight, increasing the at-gate time | and thus reducing the number of flights that could use that | gate. | silisili wrote: | Same. I love dogs. I don't want to share an airplane with | them, sorry. | | I once made the mistake of staying in a 'pet friendly' | section of a hotel. The smell alone was enough to make me | check for that next time. | nagisa wrote: | There are also many people who would prefer to not sit next | to a human that may droll, vomit, start screaming or | otherwise act unpredictably when stressed on a flight. | | None of that is unreasonable... is it? That's why I don't fly | with my dog (in large part out of concern of their well- | being), but maybe airlines should also consider not allowing | toddlers on the plane if these things are the concern? | boopmaster wrote: | Oh, wow... was really not expecting "toddlers". Those | descriptions of otherwise unpredictably acting humans is | not restricted to merely the toddler aged humans. | robbrown451 wrote: | What if the back of the plane is pets ok and the front of the | plane is for people who don't want to be near them? | | Where I live people bring the dogs into the grocery store | (carrying them, putting them in the cart, or just walking on | a leash.... and no, they aren't all service dogs) and I've | never seen a problem. | | Personally I think you should be able to get a special collar | or jacket for them that says they have passed a test that | they are well enough trained for such things etc. | sophacles wrote: | > Personally I think you should be able to get a special | collar or jacket for them that says they have passed a test | that they are well enough trained for such things etc. | | I agree with your overall point - but I doubt this would be | effective. Supposedly we already have such a system for | service animals, but there's been enough shenanigans around | that to make me cautious of this specific plan. | ldiracdelta wrote: | If you think a crying baby is a bummer on a flight, try a | crying dog. Just happened to me on my last flight. | powerset wrote: | If we're being honest, many people would prefer not to be | forced to share space with other humans, either | majormajor wrote: | Yeah, and it's easier for me to deal with that as a result: | I can pay extra and get a first class ticket to get | (depending on the plane) either some more space or A LOT | more space to myself. | | Would be nice if airlines would make it just as easy to buy | some more space for my pet. Pay more to buy the row out, | pay more to get on a limited selection of "pet friendly" | flights, probably other ideas could work too... | dwighttk wrote: | pet friendly flights seems like the best bet here... I | was sort of assuming this was a pet friendly airline, not | just a plane that you can put your pet on. | jen20 wrote: | > Some people would simply prefer not to sit next to an | animal that may drool, shed, bark or otherwise act | unpredictably when stressed on a flight. | | Can we at least apply this same standard to the other human | passengers on a flight then? | jjtheblunt wrote: | I purchased an extra seat on Virgin from SFO to SAN 6 years | ago. | | The rules may have changed since, but the flight attendants | were loving on my pets...and the 1 hour or so flight time was | hugely preferable to farting around on highways. | elefantastisch wrote: | Apparently the company ceased operations in 2011, though | indicates they plan to return: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_Airways | rmatt2000 wrote: | This sounds more luxurious than my last flight from ORD to RDU. | nostromo wrote: | Don't put your pets in the overhead bin. People have done this | (without the flight attendants even noticing) to find that their | pet has suffocated in-flight. | robbrown451 wrote: | You'd have to be spectacularly stupid to do that. The case I | heard where that happened the flight attendant it there, | without realizing there was a pet in the container. (the family | told her, but somehow she didn't hear or understand) | missedthecue wrote: | Obviously a bad idea, but are the overhead bins airtight? | dmpk2k wrote: | I detest the dehumanization of airlines; it is all very | bureaucratic now, compared to when I was a child. | | I flew two cats from oceania to Europe, and the process was | jarring; some regulation at the time prevented them even flying | together. I remember their panicked howls when I saw them again | at the airport, something that hadn't happened with any other | mode of transport. | paxys wrote: | The prices you were paying as a child are probably equivalent | to first class travel today (or even more). If you pay for it | you can still have that same luxury experience. | adonovan wrote: | > I detest the dehumanization of airlines; it is all very | bureaucratic now, compared to when I was a child. | | Yup, but it's also a heck of a lot cheaper, largely due to | mechanization, automation, homogenization, and | bureaucratization. | TacticalCoder wrote: | > I detest the dehumanization of airlines; it is all very | bureaucratic now, compared to when I was a child. | | Not to mention the feeling that you're treated like cattle. | | And that many people taking care of luggage clearly hate their | job and have absolutely zero respect for people's belongings | and shall happily throw luggage instead of handling them with | care. | | Screw flying. I drive (and, yup, it's a problem if crossing an | ocean is required). | retrac wrote: | > happily throw luggage instead of handling them with care | | It's not that they don't care; they just care more about not | getting fired for not moving quickly enough. | whycombinetor wrote: | LOL at the idea of [my pet flying separate from me, in the main | cabin of a separate plane just for pets] being a superior option | to [my pet being in my hands the entire time and handled | literally only ever by myself, which is what happens when you | take your pet in-cabin on a normal passenger airline like | Southwest]. | sahila wrote: | You do realize that you can only fly in-cabin with your pet if | it fits underneath the seat ahead of you, usually < 20 lbs. | Many pets don't fit this criteria, but otherwise I agree with | you. | jjtheblunt wrote: | or if you buy a seat for it...which i say having done so on | Virgin. | [deleted] | sahila wrote: | When's the last time you've flown doing this? I haven't | gone on Virgin with my pet but Googling shows it doesn't | allow pets in cabin (https://www.bringfido.com/travel/airli | ne_policies/virgin_atl...). | | Southwest certainly your pet has to be in the small crate. | There might be exceptions for service animals though. | learndeeply wrote: | Doesn't seem like you can. From Virgin's website: | | > We do not allow animals in the main cabin unless they are | assistance animals. | | https://help.virginatlantic.com/gb/en/how-to-book-your- | pet-o... | izacus wrote: | I've never dared to fly our pets, but do they really put them | right between all the other luggage in the hold like depicted? No | separate section? And leave them freezing? | dwighttk wrote: | It is not clear how this is different from a pet shipper (which | I've only heard of from their website) | latchkey wrote: | I'm about to travel from Cali to NYC with my ~10 lbs dog. Got a | soft-sided carrier off Amazon for pretty cheap in the required | dimensions and plan to have him in the cabin with me. | | These are the rules for AlaskaAir (+$100 each way): | | For pets traveling in the cabin, hard-sided carriers must have | maximum dimensions of 17" x 11" x 7.5" (43 cm x 28 cm x 19 cm) | and soft-sided carriers must not exceed 17" x 11" x 9.5" (43 cm x | 28 cm x 48 cm). They must be leak-proof, have adequate | ventilation, and be lined with absorbent bedding. For pets | traveling in the hold, carriers must not exceed the dimensions | 30" x 27" x 40" (76 cm x 68 cm x 101 cm). Kennels must be solid, | have handles, adequate air ventilation, and a sturdy roof. Pets | must be provided with food and water bowls attached to the | interior. | | https://www.alaskaair.com/content/travel-info/policies/pets-... | | He's a super chill dog that sleeps all the time anyway. Did a | trial run of him in the carrier and he just fell asleep. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-04-28 23:00 UTC)