[HN Gopher] Half Baked ___________________________________________________________________ Half Baked Author : marban Score : 82 points Date : 2022-05-06 16:01 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (seths.blog) (TXT) w3m dump (seths.blog) | golemotron wrote: | > Paul's not a genius | | oh, yes he is. | garyrob wrote: | I'm not at all sure the evidence support's Seth's claim that Paul | and John were not geniuses, at least at that point in their | careers. | | The music for most recorded song of all-time, Yesterday, came to | him in a dream; he went to the piano upon waking up and played | it. That's just one example. If you won't call that "genius," as | opposed to mere "skill," you have very, very high standards, I | would think unrealistically so. | | But Seth is allowed to share his writing before it's fully-baked. | :) | kubanczyk wrote: | The article is about these miniseries (not about the movie): | https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9735318/ | | Before you ask, they only stream on Disney+. | 99_00 wrote: | Making mistakes is painful. Risking judgment is painful. Respect | to everyone who is able to walk through the pain even for a | little while. | hebsbxjsndbd wrote: | The author of this post and I saw wildly different documentaries. | It was obvious to me that Paul knew exactly how every part should | be arranged and played in his songs, and that half of his battle | was bringing folks along. | Tao332 wrote: | > John is the fifth hammer. | | I didn't know what this meant. Apparently there is a legend that | Pythagoras discovered harmony accidentally by overhearing four | hammers working. Upon closer inspection of the forge, he also | heard a fifth hammer that was discordant to the other four, so he | discarded it. | | Search "Pythagorean Hammers" for multiple shaky retellings that | don't always include the fifth hammer, and a book named after it. | drcongo wrote: | "The sound you make is muzak to my ears" | rektide wrote: | What a fun post! | | The one thing I'd try to add or note is that, in a more public | environment, I'd love to see more ability to signal how baked we | think our shit is. A lot of being online is just fun & merry | making & not heavy, is apt for spitballing & play & exploration, | but that mixes in with so many serious, real, important shares in | the mileau. Just having a knob, high or low bakedness, | seriousness, doneness: this kind of information or annotation or | metadata could help us better navigate our information spaces so | much more clearly. | | Some bloggers have adopted attaching epistemic status to their | posts. Gwern for example has a write-up on his blog's use of | "status"[1], which is to inform the reader essentially of how far | they've gotten diving into the topic. | | [1] https://www.gwern.net/About#confidence-tags | tenkabuto wrote: | That's a very cool idea and quite applicable to sites with | pages that change over time, such as personal wikis. I think | I'll add it to my personal wiki! (Feeds for posts of various | maturities can be provided, too, which would be nice!) | divbzero wrote: | I really like the idea of indicating epistemic status for | posts. The closest to that for code might be version numbers | where anything under v1.0 should be taken with a grain of salt. | This dynamic of spitballing-or-serious appears on HN sometimes | when a personal project gets shared by a third party, is good | enough to attract serious comments/critiques, but then the | author of the project chimes in to say "I totally didn't expect | this to be shared here it's definitely a work in progress..." | tiffanyh wrote: | The tech equivalent of "half baked" is "Beta" software. | | This was frequent term used in the 2000s. | | "MVP" software is the modern day equivalent of half-bake/beta. | waynecochran wrote: | I have worked with dev's and researchers who have a very | sensitive "bullshit meter" which is good a lot of the time, but | often prevented me from bringing my half-baked ideas to the | table. I would wait until I knew I had something solid. | zerkten wrote: | I'm curious if they changed over time? I've observed this | change in myself to a degree. There are things I'd not have let | go in the past, but now I catch myself and evaluate the | context. There is a fine balance between reducing bullshit that | affects an organization and limiting the potential of the | organization. | waynecochran wrote: | Eventually it has always improved over time in terms of | others being open to my ideas. It sometimes takes awhile to | develop a good reputation to be trusted. | johnobrien1010 wrote: | I'm a product manager. One of the things I'm moved towards doing | with engineering teams over the years is bringing ideas when they | aren't fully fleshed out sooner to engineering teams. It really | helps do a couple of things- it saves time, if it is a bad idea, | I found out sooner rather than later. And if it is a good idea, | it gives other people the opportunity to contribute to it, making | it their own as well as mine, which helps everyone on the team | take more ownership of the outcome and have a better feeling of | purpose in life. I think you need to earn credibility before you | start doing it but once you have that credibility I highly | recommend it. | doctor_eval wrote: | It's great that you share your ideas with your team. I've been | in both product management and engineering roles and I can say | with certainty that everyone has terrible ideas, including | (sometimes especially) engineers. | | The thing is, you can't tell if an idea has legs until you | share it. And even after going through your own filter and that | of your colleagues and other disciplines, the only thing that's | actually important is how the product is received by the | audience. | | So holding it all close to your chest is just a really good way | of reducing the likelihood of success. And because of this, | wherever I can, I try to mock up a cheap prototype of a product | first, something that expresses my ideas in a tangible way that | others can understand, just to make sure that what I'm working | on is actually worth the time. | bredren wrote: | How do you and GP feel about sharing half baked ideas with | customers? | | For example, replacing a table view that gets limited | engagement with a feed with some workflow actions. | | Half baked at this point might be some static screenshots | from figma. | itsoktocry wrote: | > _Paul's not a genius_ | | This post feels like shallow, Malcolm Gladwellish, wrap-a-simple- | idea-with-a-random-narrative stuff. | | Paul McCartney might be the greatest pop musician/songwriter of | the 20th century. Some (most?) of his best works were performed | _after_ the Beatles. If he 's not a genius, then no musician is a | genius. | golemotron wrote: | Exactly. | abbub wrote: | Not only all of the above, but for Paul in particular, a genius | who was in the midst of one of the largest creative highs of | his entire career. I mean, some of the snippets of 'half-baked' | songs he plays are songs that will figure well into his | solo/Wings career. I honestly don't know how you can come out | of watching Get Back with anything other than admiration for | human creativity as personified by Paul McCartney during this | amazing month that got captured on film. | itsoktocry wrote: | > _Paul's not a genius_ | | This post feels like shallow, Malcolm Gladwellish, wrap-a-simple- | idea-with-a-random-narrative stuff. | | Yes, MVPs are good. But Paul McCartney might be the greatest pop | musician/songwriter of the 20th century. Some (most?) of his best | works were performed _after_ the Beatles. If he 's not a genius, | then no musician is a genius. | kansface wrote: | > Some (most?) of his best works were performed after the | Beatles. | | I imagine this is a _really_ unpopular and /or uncommon | opinion! I do not share it. | drcongo wrote: | I can't think of a single post-Beatles McCartney song that I | like. | v-erne wrote: | Have you heard Come On to Me ? | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeJLrtFY7Ds) For me this | is the most Beatles like song by Paul done after Beatles. | robotresearcher wrote: | 'Maybe I'm Amazed?' is a terrific song. How about it? | [deleted] | teucris wrote: | > If he's not a genius, then no musician is a genius. | | Maybe there's no such thing as genius. Maybe what we call | genius is the synthesis of many people's work, or luck, or | both. | | Not to say Paul isn't an incredible musician. Just that maybe | the Beatles were genius, not any single member. | Adraghast wrote: | > This post feels like shallow, Malcolm Gladwellish, wrap-a- | simple-idea-with-a-random-narrative stuff. | | You've identified Seth Godin's entire schtick. The man is the | godfather of vapid "give me your email address in exchange for | a free ebook where I teach you to how to become a billionaire" | hucksters and is not worthy of respect. | jwaterhouse wrote: | It's a long form LinkedIn shitpost. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Agree that Paul is a genius, not so sure I agree his best works | came post-Beatles. To be sure his catalog post-Beatles is | greater, if good songs are a roll of the dice then five decades | vs. one is kind of loading the dice.... | | I'll argue that with John and his "fresh ears" Paul was able to | write some of his most _creative_ songs with the Beatles. | formerkrogemp wrote: | A century of pop musician/songwriters and you chose Paul | McCartney as the greatest? That's a pretty high bar. His | singing doesn't come close to the melodic, cat-drowning sound | of Bob Dylan. I'd say it's much better in fact. | Tao332 wrote: | Don't cherrypick it then. The rest of the piece explains it. | He's not someone who just walks into a collaborative process | with wholly self-completed works of natural brilliance. | Instead, he's someone who knows how to facilitate the emergence | of a genius-level chemistry between himself and another. | | Now you can see that he is saying that Paul _is_ a genius, just | that his true genius isn 't exactly what we think it is when we | talk about creative genius. | [deleted] | robotresearcher wrote: | > He's not someone who just walks into a collaborative | process with wholly self-completed works of natural | brilliance | | 'Yesterday': | | "I woke up with a lovely tune in my head," he told author | Barry Miles for the biography Many Years From Now, which was | published in 1998. "I thought, 'That's great, I wonder what | that is?' There was an upright piano next to me, to the right | of the bed by the window. I got out of bed, sat at the piano, | found G, found F sharp minor 7th - and that leads you through | then to B to E minor, and finally back to E. It all leads | forward logically. I liked the melody a lot but because I'd | dreamed it I couldn't believe I'd written it." | | https://www.biography.com/news/paul-mccartney-the-beatles- | ye... | draw_down wrote: | marban wrote: | _Because the half-baked work, shared in a trusting environment, | is the fuel for the system that created the works of genius._ | | Half-baked, not half-ass, is the key. | waynecochran wrote: | Yes. If you already have a positive proven history, the more | you often you can bring your half-baked ideas to the table. | marban wrote: | I always try to apply this for an MVP (Yes, terrible word). | booboofixer wrote: | > shared in a trusting environment | | I thought this was the key. For the beatles it probably wasn't | that hard to do. But for other people taking inspiration, know | where and when to share. | | Had the beatles performed their half-baked songs in front of a | mediocre band that was to perform the very next day in front of | a large audience, what would have stopped this mediocre band | from stealing a song and performing it as their own? | | Closed-source software makes all the money in the world today. | dfee wrote: | Seth didn't include a link to the series, but it's called "The | Beatles: Get Back". | | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles:_Get_Back | paulpauper wrote: | we need to stop using the Beatles as examples of practice and | success. They are such a huge outlier. | ellyagg wrote: | There was a lot less coompetition and optimization back then | m82labs wrote: | " By putting themselves in a corner, he created (at no small | cost) the conditions where he could do the work." | | I think this might be the more important part. I am a firm | believer that you do your best and most creative work under known | and limiting constraints. With the constraints in place you | couldn't afford to NOT bring your half-baked ideas to the table. | psb wrote: | I was also impressed and surprised by how much time they spent | screwing around singing with goofy voices and the like ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-06 23:00 UTC)