[HN Gopher] The piranha problem in social psychology / behaviora...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The piranha problem in social psychology / behavioral economics
       (2017)
        
       Author : Tomte
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2022-05-06 17:20 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
        
       | notahacker wrote:
       | The problem with the piranha analogy is you can apply the _large
       | number of possible causes and effects which occur in different
       | directions_ to pretty much any science, social or otherwise.
       | There are at any one time a very large number of pathogens
       | competing for the attention of the immune system all associated
       | with overlapping symptoms and thus many competing hypotheses
       | about the cause of a particular ailment, but this doesn 't make
       | the study of medicine futile.
       | 
       | Even if you've got competing parties actively trying to nudge
       | people in a particular direction, it doesn't mean there is no
       | discernible effect; increases in political polarisation and
       | emotional attachment to brands can be observed even as people
       | consciously attempt to nudge other people in broadly opposite
       | directions.
       | 
       | This doesn't mean the social psychology and behavioural economics
       | experiments hypotheses are necessarily good ones or the
       | experiments well constructed. But complex systems and competing
       | hypotheses are present in all science and are what controlled
       | experiments and statistical controls are for...
        
       | dash2 wrote:
       | There's a related criticism made by some economists about
       | psychology: the 1-800 critique.[1] The pattern is that
       | psychologists claim that effect X exists, e.g. "hostile media
       | bias" or "social identity" or "priming". But they don't say
       | _when_ it will apply, i.e. in what circumstances. So the critique
       | was, these guys need to put a 1-800 number on their papers, so
       | you can call them and ask, hey will your effect apply in my
       | situation?
       | 
       | [1]
       | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.199....
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | booboofixer wrote:
       | Always thought the 'nudges' often referred to in these
       | experiments would only work if participants were unaware of their
       | existence. If participants become aware of the fact that they're
       | being 'nudged' one way or the other, then their reaction will
       | depend on whether or not they have issues with authority, whether
       | they value their freedom enough to fight for their right to have
       | an independent opinion free from manipulation by other actors,
       | and probably a few other factors.
        
         | krageon wrote:
         | Most normal people can be told they are being manipulated and
         | it will still work. The percentage that will actually hold the
         | thought that they should resist in their mind without losing
         | focus is very small, in my experience.
        
         | shanusmagnus wrote:
         | Many of the successful nudges are things that people don't
         | _want_ to resist, it's just taking frictions away, e.g., organ
         | donation, saving in your 401k, registering to vote, not eating
         | garbage, etc. Stuff people would generally express interest in
         | doing.
        
       | shanusmagnus wrote:
       | This was a great article -- would love recommendations of
       | anything else in a similar vein!
        
       | lupire wrote:
       | The comment about "color of a box vs its volume" is even better
       | than the "piranha" metaphor.
        
       | tbm57 wrote:
       | Somebody's reaction to the color blue is probably socially
       | constructed, like the author suggests. There's several
       | generations of popular culture in the US that reinforce the idea
       | that 'blue equals sad.'
       | 
       | But someone's reaction to a smile is on a more instinctual level.
       | I'm pretty sure that smiles carry a universal meaning for people
       | going as young as infancy. So, it doesn't seem misguided to look
       | for these effects that happen outside of a particular cultural
       | context.
        
         | barry-cotter wrote:
         | > Somebody's reaction to the color blue is probably socially
         | constructed, like the author suggests.
         | 
         | On some level this is obviously true. The important question is
         | on what level? Blue being male coded, socially construed. Blue
         | being perceived as colder probably not, which leans me towards
         | sadness association being real. Something to test.
         | 
         | On a related note I listened to an Agnes Callard podcast we
         | here she used small girls as examples of experts, on
         | prettiness, as that's the thing they care about
         | disproportionately much. Thus the fact that they agree pink and
         | purple are the prettiest colors is evidence this is in some
         | real way true. I thought that was interesting as my son's
         | favorite colors at the time were purple and mauve. He's now
         | moved on to pink. I'm persuaded that something like an
         | objective ranking of color pleasantness exists. Obviously you
         | can self-modify to like things, like architects self-modify to
         | find Brutalism and other crimes a against beauty good, or how
         | people grow to like coffee.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-06 23:00 UTC)