[HN Gopher] Apple's Director of Machine Learning Resigns Due to ... ___________________________________________________________________ Apple's Director of Machine Learning Resigns Due to Return to Office Work Author : carlycue Score : 267 points Date : 2022-05-07 20:33 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.macrumors.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.macrumors.com) | NKosmatos wrote: | Good for him and good for all the others that are able to do this | (resign and find a new full remote job). For the rest of us it's | going to be a struggle to persuade our companies that WFH is well | suited for a percentage of the workforce and they should offer it | if they want to keep good/skilled workers. WFH is not for | everybody and there are many people that want to return to | offices, but the companies that realize that can offer both will | come out of this better staffed ;-) | paul7986 wrote: | I'm so happy to work for a company who tried to do hybrid and | when no one showed up (no way i was going back its a 50 mile one | way drive) beginning of April they just said we are now a remote | company. | | Apple, Google, etc are going to learn quickly and change to all | remote soon too I bet. Weighing their prestige vs. the improved | quality of life remote brings to most workers can not compete. | Especially with company's like Air BnB which pays same very high | salaries who says work anywhere in the world. | | Overall a raise of 50 to 100k in salary would not get me back | into any office and I live alone in a small town in south central | PA. The pandemic forced me to find a new social life with new | friends that Im equally enjoying as I did with friends I had at | work (they are still around some socially but the connection isnt | as strong). | [deleted] | saddist0 wrote: | I don't get the fuss about such posts. At the end of the day, it | boils down to your personal choices. You love to remote work, | find a job with a flexible work policy. You don't, well, here are | another companies you would love to work for. | | Ultimately, markets (including job market) is all about | equilibrium. Either companies are going to increase the salary to | come back [or reduce if you are staying back at home]. | | The thing which matters the most is picking up the best option | for yourself. [and don't _always_ wait for your company to catch | up] | sys_64738 wrote: | It's because he is so high profile and a visionary in his field | at Apple. Or was. He is merely an early big fish swimming away | so expect more as draconian old-school companies try to drag | employees back to their cubes. | ripper1138 wrote: | He's absolutely not a visionary. | lajamerr wrote: | I assume Ian wants to get back into research/publishing papers as | well, he hasn't published any good papers in a while. He probably | wanted the industry experience/research of machine learning in | commercial applications with the scale and support of Apple | behind it. When Apple designs things they design it with a fixed | narrow purpose. Where as with Google you build general solutions. | I think he wanted the experience of both. This return to office | probably just gives him a good out after he accomplished what he | wanted to do at Apple. | bluepoint wrote: | maybe he did figure out how to fully automate his job. | funstuff007 wrote: | Yep, it would be amazing if he were simultaneously working 3 | other ML jobs at 7 figures a year and living like a pasha in | suburban Atlanta. | thr0wawayf00 wrote: | Good for him. | | These companies touting their solutions for creating a more | connected world can't have it both ways. Apple was able to ship | the M1 and roll out new iterations of many other offerings since | the pandemic hit. They're just fine. | | Apple didn't collapse since the pandemic hit, and the flexibility | offered by remote work is far more valuable to lots of people | than the loss of in-person collaboration opportunities. We | deserve to have input into how we work best and if that means | walking away from companies run by egomaniacs that need to see | butts in seats, then so be it. | qbasic_forever wrote: | > We deserve to have input into how we work best and if that | means walking away from companies run by egomaniacs that need | to see butts in seats, then so be it. | | The logical conclusion of this line of thinking is to organize | your coworkers. You have much more bargaining power about your | work conditions as an organized union. The history of | unionization stems primarily from workers demanding safe | working environments. | caenorst wrote: | Or just to do what he did. Ian Goodfellow and probably all | his team will have no problem finding another job in the | condition they want. Apple don't have any monopole on AI | jobs. | mgraczyk wrote: | Until you want something different from those who wield power | in the union. At least I can quit my job and work for a | different company. In heavily unionized industries, you can't | escape. | tomohawk wrote: | Having seen how several family members fared in union jobs | (several different unions), I swore I'd never belong to a | union or work any job that required me to be part of one. | | They all had such an adversarial relationship with work. It's | always us against them mentality. They could never see anyone | in management as a human. I can't imagine living like that. | | As far as I can tell, the unions didn't ever solve any of | their biggest gripes, took money out of their paychecks for | lots of non-work related political activities, and didn't | come through when they really needed to on things like | pensions or healthcare. | annexrichmond wrote: | I have the same feeling having seen family members in | unions. My mother is a really hard worker, and plays by the | rules, and that means nothing in her union while her | colleagues abuse sick policies, push more work into her and | so on. All what matters there is tenure, not the quality of | employee you are. My takeaway is that she would be far more | successful in a non unionized workplace because hers was | definitely more beneficial for slackers. | prirun wrote: | > You have much more bargaining power about your work | conditions as an organized union. | | You also give away your power as an individual to those | running the union. | lozenge wrote: | Your biggest power, the option of resigning to work | somewhere else, is still with you. You just get backup from | the union for when you don't want to exercise that power. | in_cahoots wrote: | What power do you have as an individual in a company? Other | than quitting, your leverage is extremely limited. | hiddencost wrote: | I'll refrain from ruder responses and point to the weekend | as a lovely innovation powered by unions. | | How did you get so intensely in thrall of the people | holding your collar? | GoodJokes wrote: | williamsmj wrote: | I agree with everything you say, but Goodfellow was a | manager. Managers can't join unions in the United States. | jjj123 wrote: | What do you mean by that? My manager at my last job was in | a union. There was, however, a separate union for managers | and one for ICs. | williamsmj wrote: | The NLRA says "Nothing herein shall prohibit any | individual employed as a supervisor from becoming or | remaining a member of a labor organization, but no | employer subject to this Act [subchapter] shall be | compelled to deem individuals defined herein as | supervisors as employees for the purpose of any law, | either national or local, relating to collective | bargaining." | | ...which effectively states that if a supervisor joins a | union it's a no-op. The employer is not required to | acknowledge their membership. In practice, unions | specifically exclude managers for a bunch of obvious | reasons related to their ability to bargain effectively | on behalf of their members. | | Your manager likely joined a union-ish entity open to | supervisors. IIUC such entities are not protected by the | NLRA and as such have few of the legal powers and | protections that make a union a union. They're basically | affinity groups. | reaperducer wrote: | His experience is no unique. Back in high school, my | first job was at a supermarket. The union shopsteward was | the assistant manager. | cmeacham98 wrote: | This means that manager unions do not gain the | traditional protections from the law that other unions | do. But - if a manager union and employer come to some | agreement despite this fact, it has legal weight and the | union can sue if the employer breaks the contract (and | vice versa). | | Managers, at least at the higher level like being | discussed here, arguably do not need as many protections | in order to be able to collectively bargain: Apple is | likely to be much more concerned (and thus much more | willing to negotiate) about 20 "Director of X" employees | leaving than 20 engineers. | sabellito wrote: | I have a strong dislike for remote work and will only work at | companies with offices where people are expected to go to the | vast majority of days. | | I absolutely understand that it's the opposite for some people. | holografix wrote: | Same here. I currently work at a very prestigious tech | company and I'm surprised by how _boring_ it actually is. | | There's hardly anyone around in the office and frankly I | couldn't care less about the free stuff. They pay me enough | that I can go out and buy my own snacks. | | What I want is a _team_ to learn from and grow. Not some | teachers pets that sit behind zoom calls making sure they | know exactly what's "on the test" so they make themselves | look better. | | I'll never work somewhere 100% remote or where employees | don't have an expectation of at least 3 days in the office. | | Mind you, being able to spend a day a week at home vs full | week in the office is quite nice. | praxulus wrote: | Some people prefer remote teams, some people prefer in-person | teams. | | I don't know anyone who likes hybrid teams though. | | Eventually I suspect we'll end up with a mix of remote and | in-person employers, and workers who have a strong preference | one way or another will just have to filter potential | employers accordingly. There _might_ be a way for larger | businesses to have certain teams work remotely while others | go into the office, but I suspect it would be difficult to | manage. | zmgsabst wrote: | I feel the same. | | I _like_ working from an office and I _like_ informal | interactions with colleagues -- from chatting over coffee to | peeking around and seeing who is free to whiteboard a | problem. | ytdytvhxgydvhh wrote: | Same here. Except I also hate wasting time on commuting, | not having the flexibility to take care of a home-related | task in the middle of the day, etc. So the experiment to | find a balance has begun... | skunkworker wrote: | Quite a big loss for Apple. Ian was the primary author of the | 2014 GAN paper. | | https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661 | supernova87a wrote: | I can tell you from direct experience that he is no big loss | for Apple. And he wasn't "Apple's Director of ML" as in the | headline makes it sound like the top company lead for this | topic. He was _a_ director, among many. A reasonably sized | group leader, not say, a JG. | sidibe wrote: | Likewise when he left Google for Apple the media painted him | as the director of Google AI | daniel-thompson wrote: | Can you elaborate on this. | supernova87a wrote: | Let's just say that is it correct that he is still known | for his 2014 GAN work. | daenz wrote: | It must be difficult to repeat the success of a once-in- | a-lifetime finding. | mumblemumble wrote: | I didn't take it to mean that, exactly. GANs are a very | impressive trick. But their social cachet is not, as far | as I'm aware, in proportion to people's success at using | them for practical applications that generate revenue. So | the implication might be, "Don't expect a brain drain in | Apple's GAN department to have a significant impact on | their business fortunes." | humanistbot wrote: | "Director of Machine Learning" is different than "A | director of a machine learning project." "Director of | Machine Learning" kind of implies that he oversaw a lot of | machine learning projects across the company. Being "a | director of a machine learning project" means you run a | team. Big difference. | cardy31 wrote: | I assume he just thinks Siri sucks? | jackblemming wrote: | GANs were just low hanging fruit that Schmidhuber already | found. By most accounts Ian Goodfellow is kind of an | asshole, and there was some drama about him a few times | over the years. I don't know the man, that's just what I've | heard. | anothernewdude wrote: | So he was a good culture fit for apple then? | tasubotadas wrote: | Is there anything that schmidhuber hasn't done before | everyone else? | tchalla wrote: | Remote work. | iXce wrote: | I guess citations do not directly translate into products? | nathanvanfleet wrote: | The implication I thought was that his credits might have | ended in 2014 | machinekob wrote: | Good researcher != good director/team leader. | ineedasername wrote: | I'm trying to hire for a position right now and it has dragged on | for months for two reasons: | | 1) WFH is now limited to 1 day per week, and a 3 month | probationary period where new hires don't even get that. | | 2) Salary. It's still a job seeker's market and my workplace is | not keeping pace. It's spec'ed for 3 years of experience but | salary is about the median for a _new graduate_ w /o professional | experience. I'm happy to train someone but if I rework the job | class to allow for new grads then HR will lower the starting | salary. So, I'm hoping to find someone who's a new grad but had a | part time job or internship or any other non-coursework | experience the could be even the least bit argued as adding up to | the required experience. (the position is basically a data | wrangler / sql jockey / light analysis position, but it directly | supports the main revenue-generating operations of the | organization so there is real $$$ lost by having this position | empty. ::Grrrrr:: end rant.) | wanderingmind wrote: | What you need is a new job where they don't treat your skill as | a cost center | slowbdotro wrote: | Duplicate: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31297680 | dijit wrote: | Nothing really substantial in the comment section there it | seems. | mkr-hn wrote: | It's normal for multiple threads to occur until one takes over | or a mod intervenes to merge or elevate one. | minimaxir wrote: | Technically the HN rule is "original source" which the tweet | in the linked submission is. | | However HN's rules about tweet submissions are inconsistent | and outdated. | [deleted] | trhway wrote: | >a little over four years | | Full vest. Time to go. | | I've had WFH people around for more than 20 years at all the | places I worked over that time. Mostly they were doing their job, | yet there were always limits felt to what they can do and how | much they can do. | ghaff wrote: | Pretty much everyone who has them is at least considering--even | relatively modest--vesting schedules when they make moves. | [deleted] | [deleted] | trhway wrote: | That is exactly my point. The RTO is just accidentally here | and just makes for better sounding reason. | visarga wrote: | Today he is https://twitter.com/badfellow_ian | changoplatanero wrote: | As far as I know, apple hasn't ever announced what he was working | on | AviationAtom wrote: | I'm not sure remote work is for me, but if justice can be done to | a position with little, or no, in-office time... then why force | employees into the office? | | Money can be saved on all the accomodations necessary for office | workers, so it would seem like a win-win if remote work | arrangements are viable for a position. | thr0wawayf00 wrote: | Here's to the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the | troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes... the ones who | see things differently -- they're not fond of rules... You can | quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the | only thing you can't do is ignore them because they change | things... they push the human race forward, and while some may | see them as the crazy ones, we see genius, because the ones who | are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the | ones who do... | | ...as long as it's done from the office. | CamperBob2 wrote: | "Also, be careful with that hammer, you might trip and fall and | break the screen." | | Not the same company anymore... not even close. | zasdffaa wrote: | I'm one of those misfits/troublemakers/etc. I've done my life | mostly on my terms, and I've had it really tough. Conformists | generally get it much easier. I'm all for more independent | thought and fuck-you-ness but never forget that for most people | that comes at a high price, so take off the rose-tinted specs. | nvrspyx wrote: | That was a direct quote from Steve Jobs, except the last bit | at the bottom. The whole point of the comment, I think, is | how this goes against the old Apple ethos of encouraging non- | conformity (to an extent). | hn_version_0023 wrote: | Is that a quote from Jobs, or ad copy, or both? | notpachet wrote: | It was ad copy, written by Rob Siltanen for that | campaign[1]. | | [1] | https://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2011/12/14/the- | real... | throwawayboise wrote: | Yep, I was just about to comment that this kind of decision | is a lot easier to make when you have the fuck-you money that | Goodfellow doubtless has. | smugma wrote: | I wouldn't say he has FYM yet. Enough to maybe FIRE but | more than cash, he's in a position where almost any tech or | related company would hire him, pay him a ton, and let him | work on what he wants to do. Essentially, tenure at a | university but paid 10X as much. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | I certainly don't have "fuck you money", but these days I | think _most_ competent tech workers can easily get jobs | elsewhere, so I don 't think it's a big, risky move to quit | your job. | hooande wrote: | here's to you, good luck in your journey. make it worth it | | "If you're going to try, go all the way. Otherwise, don't | even start. This could mean losing girlfriends, wives, | relatives and maybe even your mind. It could mean not eating | for three or four days. It could mean freezing on a park | bench. It could mean jail. It could mean derision. It could | mean mockery--isolation. Isolation is the gift. All the | others are a test of your endurance, of how much you really | want to do it. And, you'll do it, despite rejection and the | worst odds. And it will be better than anything else you can | imagine. If you're going to try, go all the way. There is no | other feeling like that. You will be alone with the gods, and | the nights will flame with fire. You will ride life straight | to perfect laughter. It's the only good fight there is." | | - Charles Bukowski | goldenkey wrote: | Glorious, glorious loneliness...good one. Even introverts | know that being alone sucks. Medical studies show a | correlation between poorer health and loneliness. | zasdffaa wrote: | I don't know if it's worth it. It's the way I am and I seem | to have as much choice over it as ivy chooses growing up a | wall. | | I've never been hungry by choice and I've always had a roof | over my head, and I'm grateful for both of those things, | but let's look at something I do know: "..could mean losing | ... maybe even your mind" | | Yeah, BTDT. A lifetime of mental health problems | culminating in a complete ... I dunno, breakdown? ... where | I was barely able to function for 2 years and became a risk | to others (should have been hospitalised but wasn't), and | another 2 years recovering. 4 years of my life wasted. Any | projected glamour of mental illness is purely done by those | who've never had it. Mental illness is fucking shit and has | no redeeming value. | | Edit: oh yes, and "Isolation is the gift" - Never is | loneliness a gift, ever. | Aeolun wrote: | > and has no redeeming value | | Hmm, the one redeeming value of my anxiety (and the | accompanying fear of imminent death) is that it makes it | much easier to contemplate things I wouldn't otherwise | contemplate. | | I'd still rather do without that, but I guess it's | interesting enough I can call it redeeming? | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | "Elegant, inspiring, soaring prose often makes for | incredibly shitty real-world advice." | | - hn_throwaway_99 | cm2012 wrote: | Yeah seriously, that comment is like the ultimate anti- | advice. | [deleted] | jjtheblunt wrote: | The office is where the very expensive labs are. | | For at least parts of Apple engineering, very expensive | equipment and prototypes are under lockdown and too expensive | to duplicate for WFH. | | (at least that's how it was during my several years there.) | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | I don't think anyone (or, at least not many people) is | arguing against working in the office _if you have a specific | need to be there_. What people have an issue with is | requiring a return to the office for no other reason than | "group synergy". | analog31 wrote: | Ironically, "group synergy" was given as the reason for | cramming people into the open plan offices that everybody | was glad to get away from. | smackeyacky wrote: | This guy is doing machine learning though. All he needs is an | internet connection. | | I understand the idea that hardware WFH is going to be a no- | go, but software? We already had the revolutionary moment | where the internet is everywhere. | jjtheblunt wrote: | That's not established without knowing if they're working | on neural engine hardware, for example. | imustbeevil wrote: | We can probably infer from the fact that they've been | remote for 2 years that it is possible to do their job | remotely. | whatever1 wrote: | But why ML people have to be forced in the office ? | jjtheblunt wrote: | hard to say, perhaps access to future dev hardware | accelerators (neural engines) | passivate wrote: | >but the only thing you can't do is ignore them because they | change things... they push the human race forward, | | Honestly such people are extremely rare. The quote doesn't | apply to the vast majority of employees at Apple. There are | always going to be other talented people willing to take their | spot. | systemvoltage wrote: | You have to wear pajamas to live by those words! | | Btw that quote is describing the potential _customers_ of | Apple, not employees: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sMBhDv4sik | thr0wawayf00 wrote: | > Btw that quote is describing the potential customers of | Apple, not employees | | Why does that matter? Does Apple not want the most talented, | world-changing people working on their products? If your | marketing sounds good for customers but dumb for employees, | particularly in knowledge-driven work, then maybe your | marketing is just hypocritical? | daenz wrote: | Is that why apple store employees are called "geniuses" ? | Austin_Conlon wrote: | In a talk Craig Federighi gave, he said some of his most | inventive work was done remotely with his NeXT Cube in a cabin: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43sjym5ZS68&t=677s. | idonotknowwhy wrote: | Good. This is a great way to tackle climate change. | mupuff1234 wrote: | You might agree or disagree with RTO but at least they aren't | bending the rules for execs. | qbasic_forever wrote: | Unlike Google where Urs demanded his org back in person while | he moved to New Zealand to safely work remote: | https://www.businessinsider.com/google-exec-reportedly-worki... | jeffbee wrote: | Just before he endorsed slavery on Twitter. "A bad look" | doesn't even begin to describe Urs these days. | | https://www.businessinsider.com/google-exec-urs-holzle- | buyin... | tpmx wrote: | Ugh, that is pretty damning. | nostromo wrote: | And it's not just Google. A recent report showed that | corporate execs are twice as likely to still be working | remotely compared to the rank-and-file, even as their | companies mandate returning to the office.. | | https://finance.yahoo.com/m/6017a433-bf69-48cc-9aa0-70034b2e. | .. | smugma wrote: | That's a good point (and I think it's true), but that's not | shown here. If _he_ wanted to work remote, they probably would | have let him. Maybe he'd be an ICT7 rather than a Director, but | same pay scale. His reason for quitting was he felt a more | flexible policy would be best for _his team_. Maybe he even | likes being in the office but wasn't willing to have to tow the | party line for a policy with which he didn't agree. | fortran77 wrote: | We wish him well. People leave jobs all the time. | TedDoesntTalk wrote: | Do they leave them all the time because of a return-to-office | policy? | readthenotes1 wrote: | Probably not. | | I really doubt that most people would give up a job in a | satisfying office environment with people they truly enjoy | working with on a product/project they are excited to work on | everyday simply because of they are told they have to go in | and meet those people they really groove with three times a | week. | baq wrote: | some people have a life outside of the office and found | that the commute takes a very large toll on that. they | didn't know previously, but now have two years of | experience that they'll never forget. | db48x wrote: | I'd be willing to commute about a mile to gain all of those | things. | BigBubbleButt wrote: | It seems to be pretty common today, yeah. I'd say it's | probably the most important thing for everyone I know, even | moreso than compensation lately. | ryanSrich wrote: | Good. There needs to be more of this. Forced commute is a | horrendous work-lifestyle to maintain. | subpixel wrote: | I told Apple I wasn't interested in interviewing for a non-remote | role based on their NYC office. | | I'm not an engineer who can work anywhere I want. And I'm | confident that working at Apple would have an incredible positive | effect on my career. | | Still not worth it. I'd rather find a local job outside of tech | than get back on the office space hamster wheel. | mmmmkay wrote: | I recently left Amazon for a fully remote position and that was | my sole decision making factor. | axg11 wrote: | I am working for Amazon, fully from home. Zero expectation to | ever step into the office. Each organization within Amazon is | taking a different approach, leading to a lot of variability. | Throwing this information out there in case anyone is put off | by assuming that Amazon is demanding a return to office. | faizshah wrote: | I can vouch for this as I am the only east coast employee on | my west coast team at AWS and I also have no expectation of | moving to west coast or returning to office. I have spoken to | managers on other teams around Amazon and flexibility is | entirely dependent on your director/VP (the manager 1-2 | levels above your group manager). | | If you're considering an offer from Amazon I suggest you make | it very clear from the start to your hiring manager your | expectations on remote work and working hours. Theres some | teams at Amazon that are taking a strong return to office | stance and others like mine that allow for fully remote. | ripper1138 wrote: | Good luck | bonestamp2 wrote: | Amazon recently recruited me for a job, a job that I already do | remotely for a different company, and I turned it down for the | same reason. The job at amazon paid way more, but I'm far more | productive and happier at home. | | I see other jobs at amazon that are remote, but this particular | department worked with hardware that they weren't interested in | leaving the office. Again, I've worked remotely with similar | hardware from the company that pioneered this type of hardware | and have done so since 2008. We figured out security, remote | testing, local development, software simulations, etc. and | haven't had a single leak, hack, etc. | dimtion wrote: | Amazon WFH policy is still flexible though. For example, in my | team the current policy is to work wherever we feel the most | productive and happiest. | | You could have potentially moved within the company if that was | only decision factor. | quadrifoliate wrote: | From what I hear, policy _in general_ is wildly inconsistent | within Amazon. I have heard all sort of stories from people | at Amazon ranging from "world's best boss" to "horrific and | Dilbertesque". | alistairSH wrote: | Maybe? I recently interviewed and nobody could tell me what | the policy would be in a few months. | | "It's WFH today, but that'll probably change. And you can | always take our bus from your local AWS office to the office | where the rest of the team may or may not be because we don't | know what our policy will be." | | I'd expect a company of Amazon's size and stature to have a | better plan than "whatever your VP wants this week." | humanistbot wrote: | Is there anything HNers feel more passionately about than remote | work? | willis936 wrote: | Energy market speculation. | baq wrote: | the morning commute | notpachet wrote: | The shambling idiocy of web3. | paulcole wrote: | A couple contenders off the top of my head: | | 1. Defending pseudoscience (as long as it's related to | nutrition and exercise) | | 2. Disgust with "marketing people" and anyone with an MBA | | 3. Hating "woke" culture | | 4. Justifying piracy | mattkevan wrote: | 5. Decrying any attempt at not just stuffing every feature on | the screen as dumbing down and wasting space. | | 6. The general decline of macOS with every new release. It'll | be locked down and turned into iOS any day now, just you | wait. | awinter-py wrote: | even pre-pan, johny srouji wouldn't let the silicon team move | into the open plan UFO and built them a trailer or something in | the parking lot | | (per this https://www.macrumors.com/2017/08/09/apple-park- | employees-op...) | | guessing goodfellow has specific reasons for this move (like | everyone), but feels increasingly like wfh has exposed gaps in | our ability to manage or even measure the productivity of | knowledge workers | wtallis wrote: | How do you get from: | | > _And they built his team their own building, off to the side | on the campus ..._ | | in the article to: | | > _and built them a trailer or something in the parking lot_ | | in your comment? | briandear wrote: | I left Apple for the same reason. Director level folks get the | headlines, but there are a lot of lower level folks doing the | same thing. | passivate wrote: | How many is a lot? | beefman wrote: | Two years ago, articles and comments here were flagged and | downvoted for suggesting that WFH might become permanent. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-07 23:00 UTC)