[HN Gopher] Yep, I created the new Avatar font ___________________________________________________________________ Yep, I created the new Avatar font Author : krustyburger Score : 401 points Date : 2022-05-09 16:39 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (swelltype.com) (TXT) w3m dump (swelltype.com) | behnamoh wrote: | I have the same feeling about Calibri. When someone just picks | whatever font came with MS Word/PowerPoint, it just makes me | judge all the other decisions that they made in the project. | | Maybe it's just me, but it genuinely disgusts me to see Calibri | because it's not crispt and has some of the worst curvatures I've | seen on a font. | derbOac wrote: | Calibri has a reasonably large character set and is relatively | "compact" in terms of optical size/metric. Not trying to say | it's the best typeface for any given application but if you | want something metric compatible, with a large character set, | your options are somewhat limited (or have been until | relatively recently). Many typefaces that are functionally | similar in character representation, etc. are more open and | take up more space. | alx__ wrote: | It's the default typeface for Office products since the 2007 | release. So they just didn't pick anything better | Bellyache5 wrote: | Calibri was part of a family of "C" fonts released together | as the ClearType Font Collection. | | - https://docs.microsoft.com/en- | us/typography/cleartype/clear-... | | - https://typographica.org/on-typography/microsofts- | cleartype-... | behnamoh wrote: | I heard it's going to change in the next release (or maybe it | did already). | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | > _Maybe it 's just me, but it genuinely disgusts me_ | | Feeling "genuine disgust" over a font choice sounds horrible. I | hope you manage to find peace for yourself. Maybe mindfulness | meditation could help? | imwillofficial wrote: | This led to a cool question, what objectively little, | unimportant thing can get you bent out of shape? | | Hearing people chew their food. | everyone wrote: | As long as you dont object to people chewing with their | mouths open, and instead put in ear-plugs or goto another | room or something. It's _a scientific fact_ that tastebuds | are more effective in the presence of air, (half of the | culinary arts is about getting more air into food) | | If you complain about people chewing with their mouths open | then you are attempting to objectively reduce their | enjoyment of their meal because of your weird personal | irrational ism. | kid64 wrote: | Yes, it's called living in a society | thfuran wrote: | But the question was about little things, not utter | travesties. | icambron wrote: | For me it's someone opens a jar or other food container | with a seal -- like the little layer of plastic of foil | between the lid and the food -- and instead of removing the | seal completely, they just peel it back enough to get at | the food. When they're done the put the cap back on, | leaving the next person to deal with the flap of seal | clinging uselessly to the top of the container. This drives | utterly bonkers, grossly out of proportion with the two | seconds it requires for me to finish the job. Fortunately, | I am well aware this is a me problem, not a them problem. | imwillofficial wrote: | What type of criminal leaves the seal attached?! | everyone wrote: | But if the seal is laid back down it can act as an | additional barrier to air, potentially making the food | last longer. | icambron wrote: | That's my wife's argument. But I don't believe it has any | effect at all. | webmaven wrote: | _> But if the seal is laid back down it can act as an | additional barrier to air, potentially making the food | last longer._ | | More than likely, you've touched the inside of the seal, | and by laying it back down you've made accidental | contamination of the jar's contents very easy. | | You might as well double dip (which is my pet peeve, | along with variations like reusing the knife you're | spreading mayo with to get more mayo out of the jar). | tenebrisalietum wrote: | It's embarrassingly hard for me to not go on a rant when | people use the same term to refer to assembling and | compiling, and try to equate a compiler with an assembler. | caslon wrote: | Typography is a literal profession. Like, one that's older | than computing. It's a serious art form. What you're saying | is akin to saying feeling disgust at awful programs is bad. | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | Professional artists will be the first to tell you that | there's no such thing as good or bad art. There's only art | that you like right here and right now, art that moves you | today but not tomorrow, that speaks to you but not your | neighbor. It's why we can keep making more without ever | running out. | mahoho wrote: | You should hear what Pat Metheny had to say about Kenny | G! | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-mjt1ypiF8 | caslon wrote: | You're speaking for "professional artists" like it's a | monolithic class. There are many of them that claim "Art | is subjective!" is pseudointellectual. | behnamoh wrote: | I know... I'm trying to be more accepting and not get | irritated by such things. It may sound silly to get annoyed | by a font, but the perfectionist inside of me just can't | accept picking the most available font. I actually spend a | lot of time choosing/researching fonts for my slides and | documents. | yupper32 wrote: | > I actually spend a lot of time choosing/researching fonts | for my slides and documents. | | A massive waste of time. | na85 wrote: | >the perfectionist inside of me | | >Maybe it's just me, but it genuinely disgusts me to see | Calibri because it's not crispt and has some of the worst | curvatures I've seen on a font. | | >crispt | | As a perfectionist who admits to getting wrapped around the | axle about inconsequential things like font choices, do | typos make you similarly upset? | motoxpro wrote: | Maybe it's because I just watched all of those SNL skits | but this cracked me up. Hopefully GP was being satirical. | behnamoh wrote: | Depends on the context. In a book, yes. On the internet, | not that much. | [deleted] | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | > _but the perfectionist inside of me just can 't accept | picking the most available font_ | | This strikes me as significant misattribution. There's | nothing imperfect about picking a default font because | there's no such thing as perfection in design, only | individual preferences which change from person to person, | context to context, and year to year. | everyone wrote: | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | > _Please just insult OP like a normal person._ | | I find that my own life is better when I don't normalize | insulting others. | 10amxn10 wrote: | [deleted] | dang wrote: | Please don't cross into personal attack, no matter how | strongly someone feels about a font. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | deanCommie wrote: | Interesting - I feel that way about Times new Roman, and Tahoma | (the previous 2 default Word fonts), but I find Calibri quite | pleasant! | | Out of curiousity, what are sensible basic fonts for | _documents_ that you would recommend instead? (Something meant | to be read for 1-6 pages of content, not presented in | powerpoint slides) | behnamoh wrote: | Intersting - I used to feel that way about Times New Roman | too, but gradually grown to like it for its compatcness. | | I tyically use LateX fonts for formal documents: | | https://medium.com/@parttimeben/how-to-make-word- | documents-l... | | For less formal documents, I tent to use | Helvetica/Inter/Calisto MT/Constantia and a bunch of others | that I collected over the years. | EricHolden12 wrote: | ChrisArchitect wrote: | (2020) | dmitriid wrote: | Given all the care that went into Avatar: the languages, the | culture, the visuals, it's absolutely baffling how careless | Cameron was about two things: | | - the font | | - and, most importantly, the music: | | Creating the Music of the Na'vi in James Cameron's Avatar: An | Ethnomusicologist's Role, | https://ethnomusicologyreview.ucla.edu/journal/volume/17/pie... | from one of the people who tried to create a truly unique music | for Avatar. And then simply rejected by Cameron. | | Why Avatar has the Most Ironic Soundtrack of All Time by | Sideways, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tL5sX8VmvB8 | certifiedloud wrote: | And the story. | froh wrote: | As I had to search for the SNL avatar papyrus thing here it is: | | https://youtu.be/jVhlJNJopOQ | status200 wrote: | It is also embedded in the article. | inasio wrote: | Doesn't play outside the USA (at least not Canada) | froh wrote: | Yup. The one in the article at least. Does the YouTube one | play in Canada? It works in Germany. | Extropy_ wrote: | YouTube one's fine in Canada. NBC doesn't work outside | the US, I think. | danrocks wrote: | You are doing God's work. This to me is one of the funniest SNL | sketches ever. | jeppesen-io wrote: | One of my favorite shorts from SNL | dandigangi wrote: | Heh, got scared it was going to be Papyrus | yumraj wrote: | The Papyrus skit is funny, but am unclear is there an issue with | using Papyrus? Is Papyrus not a good font? | | I'm not getting it. In other words why was the skit made? | DHPersonal wrote: | It's an overused and often misused font, similar to how Trajan | went from Rome-based works to being used on most dramatic and | thriller film posters in the early 2000s. | tadfisher wrote: | Tribal, yet futuristic. Love it! | lastdong wrote: | Story is not very original, dull even, lots of cliches. True | story, the person sitting next to me in the cinema fell asleep, | well I almost did too. I really didn't get all the hype around | it. After re-watching it, some scenes are nonetheless great. | | 3D was ok, but if I remember correctly mostly a window into the | world and not many scenes where the elements jump out of the | screen into the our side of the room. | | Released around the same time, A Christmas Carol was a great film | in that regard - spectacular 3D experience. | | Edit: The font looks great, really liked the article. | mikl wrote: | Yeah, I think it was mostly the 3D hype (and great marketing) | that made Avatar a success. The movie itself is more or less | just the sci-fi version of Pocahontas. | Tagbert wrote: | "Dances with Space Wolves" | majewsky wrote: | When Films&Stuff on Youtube did a 10-years-later video on | Avatar [1], they said that it was not just about "the 3D | hype". It was that Avatar was the first (and maybe still | only) movie to use 3D effectively because they emphasized | Positive Space (creating depth through 3D to strengthen | immersion) over Negative Space (the popping-out-of-the-screen | effect that's more commonly used because it's way more | noticeable, but also gets old fast because it's fundamentally | a gimmick). | | I too have quickly grown tired of 3D movies and actively | avoided them for the last 10 years, but when Avatar 2 comes | out, I will _definitely_ see it in 3D. | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt-kEIQcLKw | everyone wrote: | Those aged/distressed fonts with little nicks / chunks missing / | broken bits, look fine until there are two or more of the same | letter in a sentence. Then I cant help but notice that the same | letters are aged/distressed in exactly the same way.. It seems | like a really obvious issue that clearly undermines the effect | they are going for. | xoa wrote: | Agreed, that's definitely the big glaring issue to me too. | Normally all letters being identical is a good expected thing, | but for an aged look it falls flat because aging doesn't | uniformly affect every single letter across pages and books of | course. And our brains are pretty good at doing pattern | recognition/outline shape comparison with stuff that is side- | by-side, so once you notice it niggles a bit. Now that I think | about it that seems like a product which should exist, be it | standalone or as a plug-in, where "aging" could be soft-applied | (not talking rasterizing the text then applying filters to the | pixels themselves) to any arbitrary string of text either with | a certain amount of random noise or via algorithms that would | simulate various kinds of environmental effects on | stone/wood/papyrus/vellum/paper. It's almost certainly not | worth having that kind of complexity in fonts/typesetting | engines themselves though the typegeek in me thinks it'd be | pretty dang fun. | capitainenemo wrote: | I've seen a ton of fonts out there abuse ligatures | (Chartwell, Bullshit Sans). I wonder if something like that | could be done for pseudorandomness... use a different texture | depending on the text on either side. | capableweb wrote: | You could in theory do just that, but the amount of work to | achieve that would be staggering, automated or not. | | What we really need in this world is procedural/generated- | on-the-fly fonts, where you setup how the font is suppose | to react to X and then use that. | colejohnson66 wrote: | Knuth's METAFONT might help, but it never took off | because font designers aren't mathematicians or | programmers. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metafont | | https://s3-us- | west-2.amazonaws.com/visiblelanguage/pdf/16.1/... | robocat wrote: | There is also https://spectral.prototypo.io/ which was an | unsuccessful startup | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24911784 | everyone wrote: | I would be suprised if such a thing doesnt exist in the fancy | programs professional movie poster making people are using | nowadays. If not, then totally sounds like a product with a | clear business case, customer #1 James Cameron. | mikl wrote: | You monster (j/k). | | Nice font work. I'll be greatly surprised if the Avatar sequels | gain anything like the popularity the first movie had, but at | least it won't be because they used Papyrus. | Sophistifunk wrote: | This is why movies cost so damned much and we're stuck with | nothing but reboots, sequels, rehashes, and spinoffs, because the | money people need a sure thing with this kind of expenditure. | zeckalpha wrote: | Looks like the Legend of Korra logo! | webmaven wrote: | The new typeface is nice, providing the required feel without | succumbing to cliche, but now whoever is actually using it to | typeset titles isn't doing any kerning! This makes the title look | like it is supposed to be "Avata R" (the typographer almost | certainly did create proper kerning in the font, but as soon as | you start messing with different sizes and increasing the | tracking, the kerning is going to have to be adjusted as well, | and that wasn't done). | | It's like James Cameron said "Fine! I won't let my guy I had make | the titles last time choose the font, we'll have a new font made. | But I want the my guy to do the rest of the title work, because | he'll still do it for just a crew jacket." | | https://www.creativebloq.com/news/avatar-way-of-water-logo | | Anyway, I quite appreciate the WIP sketches, it makes it plain | what the influences are: the bones of the letters are somewhat | reminiscent of typefaces like Lithos or Penumbra, and the slight | blobbiness of terminals and serifs (which might otherwise be | classified as either wedge or flare serifs) subtly recall both | Papyrus and some "runic" typefaces. The "runic" influence shows | up in some other details as well, like the 'v' of the A's | crossbar. The rejected "too extreme" lowercase has a hint of | Fraktur or something similar. | | Like Papyrus, though, this is most certainly a display font. I | hope the designer gets to create a toned-down text version that | will be usable for subtitles, fixing the other poor typography | decision made in the first movie. | jcronenberg wrote: | Thanks, now I can't ever unsee it being "AVATA R" | codetrotter wrote: | I don't see it. It reads like "AVATAR" to me, even though | this is the first time I am seeing the new logo and I read | these comments before looking at the logo. | | Are we reading it differently? I see that there is some | additional space on the top before the "R", but I think that | when I am reading it I might be looking mainly at the bottom | 75% of the logo, and it looks fine there so maybe that's why | it still looks fine to me? | | Alternatively, having seen the first movie a couple of times | and having seen the original logo a couple of times, maybe I | am so used to the word "Avatar" from the original logo that | even if I try to read the new logo as "AVATA R" I still read | it as "AVATAR"? | | On the other hand, there is a company in Norway (and I think | they are in several other countries also), called "BDO" and | even though I know about their company from having heard | about it several times and having even attended a couple of | business presentations that they have held, I consistently | misread their logo as "LBDO". You can see their logo on the | Norwegian website, it has the letters "BDO" on it in blue, | with an L-looking shape in red immediately in front of the | letters; https://www.bdo.no/nb-no/home-no . So it seems that | familiarity is not always enough to read a logo the way that | it was intended to be read. | jacobolus wrote: | The subtitles in Avatar were much worse than the title or | poster. | OtomotO wrote: | amelius wrote: | Anyone else having "font fatigue"? I just can't tell whether a | font is new or not. They all look like they came from some | standard stock library that everybody already uses. | barkingcat wrote: | That's not font fatigue. That means the font designers did | their job. | | You're not supposed to be able to tell if a font is new or not | (unless you work as a typographer or graphics designer) | | You should ask yourself: is the text legible, does it make | reading easier? Does it add a bit of visual interest or flatten | visual interest (ie fades into the background) depending on | what the design calls for? | | Those are the important questions. As to whether a font is new | or not, if you are a typographer, then that is your bread and | butter. I had a friend who's a typographer and they would be | able to point out all the ways Helvetica is different from | Helvetica Neue (and talk about it for hours and days on end), | for example: | | https://creativepro.com/helvetica-vs-neue-helvetica-same-but... | kadomony wrote: | Yo, fix that kerning, dawg. | OtomotO wrote: | Well, the story was basically Pocahontas on an alien planet. | | There wasn't anything original to the plot, so... | | Technically it was good, but I only watched it once, I see films, | just like I read books: for the story | TameAntelope wrote: | I watch films for a lot of reasons that have nothing to do with | the script, and Avatar had a _lot_ going for it that wasn 't | written on the script when it came out, but films like that | tend to age poorly. What's so impressive is that Avatar... | didn't age poorly, it still looks quite good, even by our | modern standards. | | I'll probably see these for the spectacle, if nothing else. | jonny_eh wrote: | Papyrus 2.0 | | Looks nice! | gitpusher wrote: | Looks great. Although it could really use a "tt" ligature. Just | look at the names "Scott" and "Letteri" and you'll see what I | mean | no-dr-onboard wrote: | The body text font for this blog post is hard to read. | | I can't tell if that's ironic or not. | gkoberger wrote: | I imagine he's in a hard position. He makes fonts for TV shows | / games / etc, and they tend to be silly/weird/unique. He kinda | needs to use his own typeface for his blog, and he doesn't have | a lot of "sane" options to choose from! | | (Here's the font used for the paragraphs: | https://swelltype.com/commercial-fonts/hyperspace-race/) | capableweb wrote: | Sans-serif is typically not a very good fit for body texts. The | line-height is also set too low, makes it harder to jump to the | next line as you try to find which one it is. | majewsky wrote: | This is absolutely correct for books, but a blogpost is not a | book. The most significant reason to use sans-serif for UI | text is that screens with less DPI tend to utterly destroy | serif fonts with small font sizes. Serif fonts just rely that | much more on high DPI values like on a book. If you somehow | have an audience that's exclusively on Retina displays (e.g. | for iPad/iPhone apps), I would be less hesitant to try out a | few serif options. But designers tend to forget that e.g. not | all desktop users are on color-graded 5K iMacs. | runarberg wrote: | I'm curious where you heard that sans-serifs are not a good | fit for body text. | | Sans-serifs has been a popular choice for body text on | posters, backcovers (of books, albums, board-games etc.), | user interfaces, instruction pamphlets, social media, blog | pages, etc. I honestly have no idea where a recommendation | such as this could originate from. | contravariant wrote: | Seems ironic to read this in a sans-serif font. | | The font of this article is bloody awful though, I'll agree | with you on that. | [deleted] | bdlowery wrote: | A Sans-serif font is totally fine for body copy. | shadowofneptune wrote: | Seems to be that kind of misuse where a typeface used for | titles or headings is used for the body. | ramraj07 wrote: | The kerning in the word "often" was so bad! | christkv wrote: | Lol I love the following line from that sketch | | > He just highlighted Avatar, he clicked the drop down menu and | then he randomly selected Papyrus. Like a thoughtless child just | wandering by a garden yanking leaves along the way. | behnamoh wrote: | That's what most people do with their PowerPoint slides and | Word documents. I can totally relate with Ryan Gosling in the | clip. | paxys wrote: | "I don't even think this is Papyrus. They clearly modified it." | | "Whatever they did, it wasn't enough!" | supertofu wrote: | God bless Julio Torres. One of my favorite SNL sketches of all | time. That and "Fischer Price Wells for Sensitive Boys" -- | another Julio Torres sketch! | evan_ wrote: | Check out his HBO show Los Espookys. It's really good and | fully lives in the surreal dream logic world of those | sketches. | sydthrowaway wrote: | Papyrus is the top SNL skit of all time. The next one is Grouch | (Sesame street x Joker parody). What would be #3? | agrover wrote: | More cowbell. | silisili wrote: | There's so many I was trying to think of, but the one's that | probably had the most staying power with the family and | friends at the time were the Celebrity Jeopardy ones, by far. | So many bad Sean Connery impressions for months, if not | years. Here are a few... | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEghu90QJH4 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch_hoYPPeGc | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFSkWfFhO0 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=df5iwY7QUTY | oneoff786 wrote: | Black Jeopardy with Tom Hanks | drewzero1 wrote: | My favorite recently, and very close to home for me, was Home | Repair Show with Oscar Isaac: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma70ghSEMys | | Edit: another one with lasting power in my household is Man | Park: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XOt2Vh0T8w | [deleted] | atlasunshrugged wrote: | Agreed Papyrus is top 3, I might quibble over the grouch | because I think either the crime scene skit or the coroner | skit might take 2 and 3 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo6CyNNC60M | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjS8cA2Jfzc | chrisweekly wrote: | Those are both in my top 10, but IMHO "A thanksgiving | miracle" ("Hello from the outside" Adele sendup), Cowbell, | Taco Town, and United Way (Peyton Manning beaning that kid in | the back with a laser pass), Kristen Wiig's Christmas | Morning, and -- omg, best for last? -- Kate McKinnon's | Paranormal encounters (really any of her Ms Rafferty skits) | are all up there with Papyrus and Grouch. | | I'm sure there's recency bias at play, but those are the ones | I can think of now that just HIT. | atlasunshrugged wrote: | I forgot about the Paranormal encounters, those were top | notch | robochat wrote: | Taco Town!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evUWersr7pc | robochat wrote: | Jim Carrey did a pretty good Matthew McConaughey SNL skit: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3eN9u5N2Q4 | yboris wrote: | Papyrus skit direct link: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVhlJNJopOQ | jabroni_salad wrote: | Za (james franco) - | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkP2F7kWn7A | | Spelling bee (also james franco) - | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02S8t0F1inc | | Career Day (Adam Driver) - | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7HD2xG92-0 | | What's that name (bill hader) | -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rImxuuD_kwM | ocdtrekkie wrote: | Both "What's That Name"s easily make up two of my top | three, with Papyrus being the other one. | Kaibeezy wrote: | Maraka - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1CeEXkNBGs | astrange wrote: | The only good SNL skit is World Peace Rap | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce3ST3wRPCI) because it's a | parody of a YouTube video from 2006 | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--Vaz9jW054&t=75s). | | There aren't any other good ones. I imagine the audience for | SNL is entirely those people who reply to everything with | GIFs from The Office. | astrange wrote: | Amendment: Stu | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OJ7aW3Df5U) is okay | because it's how I learned that Eminem stopped dying his | hair and looks like a dad now. | CharlesW wrote: | Haunted Elevator (ft. David S. Pumpkins): | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS00xWnqwvI | Snild wrote: | So many good ones, I can't choose. | | Black Jeopardy with Tom Hanks -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7VaXlMvAvk | | Close Encounter -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfPdYYsEfAE | | Disney Housewives -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-2fnZfK9Lg | | Friendos -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oPe80mdcZg | | GE Big Boys -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZRzJJcq6Rs | | Miley Cyrus and Kyle Mooney's Sex Tape -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEqStuivoio | | Santa Baby -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkrpvCs-kfE | | The Day Beyonce Turned Black -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ociMBfkDG1w | | Wells for Boys -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BONhk-hbiXk | | World War II 101 -- | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bdf_XdDwc-o | ImpulseGuided wrote: | For me it's "Levi's Wokes" | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPXDTvADD0 | dmitriid wrote: | "The Midnight Coterie of Sinister Intruders" is my all-time | #1 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfDIAZCwHQE | CrazedGeek wrote: | For me, it's definitely Meet Your Second Wife: | https://youtu.be/MJEAGd1bQuc | slantview wrote: | Chris Farley's "Down by the River" skit is my #1 of all time. | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv2VIEY9-A8 | [deleted] | [deleted] | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | Should have just used Papyrus. Now we'll never have a sequel to | that SNL sketch. | gkoberger wrote: | A lot of times, the issue isn't the font... it's ubiquity and | misuse. | | Comic Sans, for example, was literally for speech bubbles for a | comic book dog. | | Papyrus was created by a 23 year old who was reading the Bible | and wanted to translate the feel to a computer. | Hamuko wrote: | Papyrus also makes for a dogshit font for legible subtitles. | kevinmchugh wrote: | Comic Sans might have a better reputation if its lower-case was | just smaller upper-case, as Dave Gibbons does. | munificent wrote: | The problem with Comic Sans is that it was a originally a | pixel font designed to look good un-antialiased at a specific | pixel size. When that was expanded to a vector font, the | resulting proportions looked really horrific at other sizes. | | Like taking an old 16x16 NES Super Mario Bros sprite, scaling | it up to 4K and expecting it to look like an attractive | portrait of an Italian plumber. | Kaibeezy wrote: | Comic Papyrus - https://creativemarket.com/blog/designer- | combines-papyrus-an... | sporkland wrote: | I wish they had secretly released the font and got it widely | adopted a year or so ahead, to ensure we could get a second SNL | skit. | westcort wrote: | Obligatory: "I know what you did!" | sydthrowaway wrote: | I love how the designer seems evil | behnamoh wrote: | I love the meme scene where Ryan is driving and keeps eye | contact with the designer! | kixiQu wrote: | I use a "textured" font on my website | (https://fonts.google.com/specimen/IM+Fell+English, see | https://maya.land) and it bothers me all the time that the | deformations repeat across letters -- like cracked stone ones | where the cracks are the same on every "a"? Because I think | mine's simple enough, eventually I'm going to figure out how to | get a similar effect with an SVG filter like the "xerox" one on | https://endtimes.dev/. | munificent wrote: | I hate fonts that have textural imperfections that are | repeatedly perfectly on every instance of the same character, | destroying the illusion. | | When I wrote my book "Crafting Interpreters", I hand-lettered | every single word in every illustration separately so that it | would be as imperfect as it appeared. | Dangeranger wrote: | Your hand lettering is excellent by the way. Thanks for | taking the time to do that. It's a lost art. | | The only works of comparable quality I am aware of are | classics like the Moosewood Cookbook[0] (famously completely | hand typeset), Allen and Mikes Really Cool Backcountry Ski | Book[1], and Anybody's Bike Book[2]. | | Hand illustrating technical content is so much better than | sterile diagrams, and it lends a sense of personalization, | especially if the illustrator is also the author, which is a | rarity. | | [0] https://www.baumanrarebooks.com/rare-books/katzen- | mollie/moo... | | [1] https://skimo.co/allen-mikes-backcountry-ski-book | | [2] https://archive.org/details/anybodysbikebook00cuth | munificent wrote: | Don't forget the Forrest Mims electronics books that were | in every Radio Shack back in the day. | TameAntelope wrote: | > I hand-lettered every single word in every illustration | separately so that it would be as imperfect as it appeared. | | Good lord, I'm going to think about this every time I | consider dedication to craft. | | Seriously, wow. That's impressive. I'm sorry this isn't more | substantive of a comment, but I really wanted you to know how | amazing that is (as you probably already do). | munificent wrote: | There is almost certainly a pathological component to how | much effort I sunk into the book but once I started... I | kinda just kept doing it. | | Also, lettering was sort a of a nice peaceful zen break | from the harder work of writing prose. | jszymborski wrote: | You might be interested in Fredrick Brennan's TT2020 which is | designed to explicitly address this | | https://ctrlcctrlv.github.io/TT2020/docs/ | ricardobeat wrote: | Character alternates have been a feature in OpenType for a | while. They can be triggered contextually or manually with CSS. | Usually these and ligatures are enough to create natural- | looking variations. | kixiQu wrote: | I think this is probably true to most people, and therefore | good advice, but boy howdy do I still notice the repeats in | e.g. "handwriting" fonts with extensive alternates -- the | worse the quirkier the glyphs are supposed to be. | angst_ridden wrote: | Back in the day, I created a font called "Scribble Flinger" | that would put smudges and stains throughout if you enabled | the contextual alternates. I came up with several | alternates for each glyph, and was pretty pleased with the | result. | | It's a free font, and I occasionally see it used in posters | for rock shows or other "alternate" events. | | But your point is right on. I only created three alternates | per glyph, if I remember correctly, so if you were to try | to use it for an entire page of text, it would reveal its | tricks pretty quickly. For just a title or header, I think | it holds up. | Dangeranger wrote: | Do you know fonts that feature character alternates | prominently? I cannot think of type that I've seen used which | used variations on characters to lead to the appearance of | natural looking hand written text. | gorkish wrote: | It's possible in PostScript to dynamically modify each glyph. | Long long ago, I saw a small collection of typewriter and | handwriting fonts that did this. This would have been back in | the mid 90's or so. | NavinF wrote: | TIL postscript has an rng in the form of the rand function. | | Assuming it's widely implemented, it'd be hilarious to | distribute files that replace their contents with a 4koma | 1% of the time. | capitainenemo wrote: | Is this related? | | https://itnext.io/typescript-and-turing-completeness- | ba8ded8... | | I'd read this long ago, but my impression was that all | the hinting stuff is auto stripped out of loaded web | fonts for security/performance these days (maybe after | some of those early font vulnerabilities that caused | NoScript to block fonts), so most of us can't use it. | | That's why I was wondering if ligatures might be a | reasonable hack. | gwern wrote: | You may not have an explicit rand(), but with the | ligatures & substitution rules, you can add so much | context sensitivity that no one will ever spot any | duplications. | | That's how you can do things like | https://litherum.blogspot.com/2019/03/addition-font.html | https://pagedout.institute/download/PagedOut_002_beta2.pd | f#p... https://aftertheflood.com/journal/the-worlds- | first-code-free... https://www.coderelay.io/fontemon.html | (most of these will work in a browser). I've also | suggested that you can create 'prank fonts' which add in | subtle typos sporadically. | | Less evilly, this is what calligraphy handwriting fonts | do to get convincing variation. | zimpenfish wrote: | I used a handwriting font with dynamic variations ~99-00 to | generate address labels for someone entering competitions | because printed labels were considered somewhat "cheating". | Wasn't entirely convincing if you looked hard but miles | better than 50 identical Times New Romans. | lupire wrote: | That web page font is so harsh on my eyes, hard to read. | | Also, "tribal" is a weird choice of word. What is the intended | meaning? | andybak wrote: | It's weird that you find it weird. The meaning seems obvious to | me (despite being incredibly inaccurate, western-centric and | mildly patronising) | | I would say it means "evocative of cultures that are | stereotypically thought to be tribal in the colloquial sense of | the word" | berkeleyjunk wrote: | I really got excited and thought this was about the other (IMHO | better) Avatar | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar:_The_Last_Airbender | | But this font looks cool too. | drewzero1 wrote: | The show was great, but the live-action movie was a bit | lackluster when it came out. I haven't rewatched recently to | see how it aged. | supertofu wrote: | What live-action movie? There is no live-action movie in Ba | Sing Se... | pengstrom wrote: | The live action movie is widely regarded as a cinematic and | adaptive dumpster fire. Panned by fans, critics and audiences | drewzero1 wrote: | Anecdotally, my friend and I were the only people in the | theater when we went to see it. I definitely remember some | fundamental mechanics of bending being changed to suit the | movie's narrative. | lynguist wrote: | I love that show so, so much. It was the peak on top of a | Nickelodeon that was already peaking (Spongebob etc). | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | Avatar: The Last Airbender is the best TV show ever, despite | being targeted at children aged 9 (no, I'm not exaggerating). | It has great character arcs, depth, humour, and it landed the | ending perfectly. (unlike overhyped D&D chaps). | | My only complaint about it is that in the beginning of S1 they | had way too many gags at Sokka's expense. Fortunately, they've | significantly dialled it down around episode 6 or 7. | bryanrasmussen wrote: | I think it's basically everyone's opinion that watched both, | which is why 10 Years Later, 'Avatar' Is the Most Popular Movie | No One Remembers | https://www.vice.com/en/article/bjw4bv/10-years-later-avatar... | which obviously is not completely true, as evidenced by this | post, but one thing I have noticed is that whenever anyone | mentions the movie Avatar someone always comes in and says I | got excited because I thought we were talking about the other | one, but whenever anyone mentions the other one nobody gives a | damn about the movie. | | on edit: I guess 13 years later, but who cares, it's Avatar the | movie. | iroh2727 wrote: | Yeah honestly I only remember Avatar the movie because of the | SNL Papyrus skit mentioned in this article lol. Possibly | superior to the movie. But who knows, maybe Avatar 2 with its | new font will be better... | | I mean, I do like the ideas and messages Avatar the movie was | going for, but perhaps it was too visual for me. The | experience of watching in theater was great/dazzling but | nothing really stuck with me. | schroeding wrote: | Reminds me of this video: Can you name a character from | Avatar? https://youtu.be/kxp1IBK1OPI?t=6 | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | I would have actually pass that test, I can name Colonel | Quaritch, Jake Sully, Ripley and Eiwa (I think it counts as | a character). | 40four wrote: | I've never seen 'The Last Airbender', but always heard good | things. | | As far as Avatar 'The movie', the plot & storyline was | certainly not the most original, or memorable, but I'll never | forget watching it in 3D in the theater. | | Still to this day, I don't think any movie has come close to | utilizing 3D visuals they way they did. It's was absolutely | stunning, and added a lot to the experience! | | Especially for the time it came out, the 3D tech was just | starting to become popular in theaters. I've seen many movies | since then in 3D, and it always seems like an afterthought. | Doesn't really change or add that much. | | Avatar, on the other hand, seemed to be designed from the get | go to be a 3D movie and it shows. I will always hold it in my | mind, as the pinnacle of 3D movies. Still waiting for someone | to make a movie that even comes close. | prmoustache wrote: | The problem is it tried so hard to be a 3D movie that it was | lacking in all other area. The movie itself was pretty boring | with everything so predictable. | | Funnily nobody watches movies in 3d anymore I think? Looks | like it was bust a fad. | jhbadger wrote: | It was a fad! And it wasn't the first time either. 3D films | were all the rage in the 1950s in movies like "The Creature | From the Black Lagoon", although they used the older "red & | blue" filter technology. In the 1980s it was back briefly | for films like "Metalstorm: The Destruction of Jared-Syn" | using polarized glasses, and finally in the new millennium, | movies like "Avatar". | aasasd wrote: | The Lumiere brothers attempted 3D films even before they | properly started with 2D ones (iirc). | | It's hypothesized that, with old accounts of Lumieres' | enterprise being very messy, the 2D premiere of 'The | Arrival' was conflated with the 3D showing, and that's | where we get the stories of the audience panicking about | the train. | yreg wrote: | >The problem is it tried so hard to be a 3D movie that it | was lacking in all other area. | | This is okay IMO. There is no shortage of great movies. I | don't mind that we've got Avatar: the incredible tech demo | with uninteresting plot instead of Avatar: a good movie. | escape_goat wrote: | "Alita: Battle Angel" might be a candidate. I thought the 3D | cinematography was pretty good. | Pxtl wrote: | I really hope we get sequels to that. They left the ending | nicely open in the movie, and there's a hell of a lot of | material to draw on. Although imho the original manga kind | of got worse over time. I've read the whole series except | for the flashback books set on Mars, and it gets to be a | bit of a slog and has some _very_ strange ideas. | davidkuennen wrote: | Rewatched the show two weeks ago for the 10th time. It's a | masterpiece. | Dangeranger wrote: | That would be the following font I believe[0]. | | https://anchorfonts.com/avatar-the-last-airbender-font/ | berkeleyjunk wrote: | Thank you for that pointer. You made my day! | aasasd wrote: | > _Adrian Frutiger has designed the avatar's structure with | average strokes._ | | Sure sure, and storyboards were probably done by Picasso. | brodo wrote: | The Chapo boys make some interesting pro Avatar (the movie) | points: https://youtu.be/s7CtTo88QOI | imwillofficial wrote: | That video was awesome, and this article was a great read. I | would like a deeper dive on your choices, this is an interesting | topic. | evantahler wrote: | People like this font https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVhlJNJopOQ | oldstrangers wrote: | I just keep calling it Papyrus Black. A definite improvement | though. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-05-09 23:00 UTC)